Binomial distribution

Binomial distribution
	Probability mass function
	Cumulative distribution function
Notation	B(n, p)
Parameters	n ∈ N0 — number of trials; p ∈ [0,1] — success probability in each trial
Support	k ∈ { 0, …, n } — number of successes
pmf
CDF
Mean
Median	or
Mode	or
Variance
Skewness
Ex. kurtosis
Entropy	; in shannons. For nats, use the natural log in the log.
MGF
CF
PGF
Fisher information	(for fixed )

Binomial distribution for

p=0.5

with n and k as in Pascal's triangle

The probability that a ball in a Galton box with 8 layers (n = 8) ends up in the central bin (k = 4) is

70/256

.

In probability theory and statistics, the binomial distribution with parameters n and p is the discrete probability distribution of the number of successes in a sequence of n independent experiments, each asking a yes–no question, and each with its own boolean-valued outcome: a random variable containing a single bit of information: success/yes/true/one (with probability p) or failure/no/false/zero (with probability q = 1 − p). A single success/failure experiment is also called a Bernoulli trial or Bernoulli experiment and a sequence of outcomes is called a Bernoulli process; for a single trial, i.e., n = 1, the binomial distribution is a Bernoulli distribution. The binomial distribution is the basis for the popular binomial test of statistical significance.

The binomial distribution is frequently used to model the number of successes in a sample of size n drawn with replacement from a population of size N. If the sampling is carried out without replacement, the draws are not independent and so the resulting distribution is a hypergeometric distribution, not a binomial one. However, for N much larger than n, the binomial distribution remains a good approximation, and is widely used.

Specification

Probability mass function

In general, if the random variable X follows the binomial distribution with parameters n ∈ ℕ and p ∈ [0,1], we write X ~ B(n, p). The probability of getting exactly k successes in n trials is given by the probability mass function:

f(k,n,p)=\Pr(k;n,p)=\Pr(X=k)={n \choose k}p^{k}(1-p)^{n-k}

for k = 0, 1, 2, …, n, where

{\binom {n}{k}}={\frac {n!}{k!(n-k)!}}

is the binomial coefficient, hence the name of the distribution. The formula can be understood as follows. k successes occur with probability p^k and n − k failures occur with probability (1 − p)^n − k. However, the k successes can occur anywhere among the n trials, and there are ${n \choose k}$ different ways of distributing k successes in a sequence of n trials.

In creating reference tables for binomial distribution probability, usually the table is filled in up to n/2 values. This is because for k > n/2, the probability can be calculated by its complement as

f(k,n,p)=f(n-k,n,1-p).

Looking at the expression ƒ(k, n, p) as a function of k, there is a k value that maximizes it. This k value can be found by calculating

{\frac {f(k+1,n,p)}{f(k,n,p)}}={\frac {(n-k)p}{(k+1)(1-p)}}

and comparing it to 1. There is always an integer M that satisfies

(n+1)p-1\leq M<(n+1)p.

ƒ(k, n, p) is monotone increasing for k < M and monotone decreasing for k > M, with the exception of the case where (n + 1)p is an integer. In this case, there are two values for which ƒ is maximal: (n + 1)p and (n + 1)p − 1. M is the most probable (most likely) outcome of the Bernoulli trials and is called the mode. Note that the probability of it occurring can be fairly small.

Cumulative distribution function

The cumulative distribution function can be expressed as:

F(k;n,p)=\Pr(X\leq k)=\sum _{i=0}^{\lfloor k\rfloor }{n \choose i}p^{i}(1-p)^{n-i}

where $\scriptstyle \lfloor k\rfloor \,$ is the "floor" under k, i.e. the greatest integer less than or equal to k.

It can also be represented in terms of the regularized incomplete beta function, as follows:^[1]

{\begin{aligned}F(k;n,p)&=\Pr(X\leq k)\\&=I_{1-p}(n-k,k+1)\\&=(n-k){n \choose k}\int _{0}^{1-p}t^{n-k-1}(1-t)^{k}\,dt.\end{aligned}}

Some closed-form bounds for the cumulative distribution function are given below.

Example

Suppose a biased coin comes up heads with probability 0.3 when tossed. What is the probability of achieving 0, 1,..., 6 heads after six tosses?

\Pr(0{\text{ heads}})=f(0)=\Pr(X=0)={6 \choose 0}0.3^{0}(1-0.3)^{6-0}=0.117649

\Pr(1{\text{ heads}})=f(1)=\Pr(X=1)={6 \choose 1}0.3^{1}(1-0.3)^{6-1}=0.302526

\Pr(2{\text{ heads}})=f(2)=\Pr(X=2)={6 \choose 2}0.3^{2}(1-0.3)^{6-2}=0.324135

\Pr(3{\text{ heads}})=f(3)=\Pr(X=3)={6 \choose 3}0.3^{3}(1-0.3)^{6-3}=0.18522

\Pr(4{\text{ heads}})=f(4)=\Pr(X=4)={6 \choose 4}0.3^{4}(1-0.3)^{6-4}=0.059535

\Pr(5{\text{ heads}})=f(5)=\Pr(X=5)={6 \choose 5}0.3^{5}(1-0.3)^{6-5}=0.010206

\Pr(6{\text{ heads}})=f(6)=\Pr(X=6)={6 \choose 6}0.3^{6}(1-0.3)^{6-6}=0.000729

^[2]

Mean

If X ~ B(n, p), that is, X is a binomially distributed random variable, n being the total number of experiments and p the probability of each experiment yielding a successful result, then the expected value of X is:^[3]

\operatorname {E} [X]=np.

For example, if n = 100, and p = 1/4, then the average number of successful results will be 25.

Proof: We calculate the mean, μ, directly calculated from its definition

\mu =\sum _{i=0}^{n}x_{i}p_{i},

and the binomial theorem:

{\begin{aligned}\mu &=\sum _{k=0}^{n}k{\binom {n}{k}}p^{k}(1-p)^{n-k}\\&=np\sum _{k=0}^{n}k{\frac {(n-1)!}{(n-k)!k!}}p^{k-1}(1-p)^{(n-1)-(k-1)}\\&=np\sum _{k=1}^{n}{\frac {(n-1)!}{((n-1)-(k-1))!(k-1)!}}p^{k-1}(1-p)^{(n-1)-(k-1)}\\&=np\sum _{k=1}^{n}{\binom {n-1}{k-1}}p^{k-1}(1-p)^{(n-1)-(k-1)}\\&=np\sum _{\ell =0}^{n-1}{\binom {n-1}{\ell }}p^{\ell }(1-p)^{(n-1)-\ell }&&{\text{with }}\ell :=k-1\\&=np\sum _{\ell =0}^{m}{\binom {m}{\ell }}p^{\ell }(1-p)^{m-\ell }&&{\text{with }}m:=n-1\\&=np(p+(1-p))^{m}\\&=np\end{aligned}}

It is also possible to deduce the mean from the equation $X=X_{1}+\cdots +X_{n}$ whereby all $X_{i}$ are Bernoulli distributed random variables with $E[X_{i}]=p$ ( $X_{i}=1$ if the ith experiment succeeds and $X_{i}=0$ otherwise). We get: $E[X]=E[X_{1}+\cdots +X_{n}]=E[X_{1}]+\cdots +E[X_{n}]=\underbrace {p+\cdots +p} _{n{\text{ times}}}=np$

Variance

The variance is:

\operatorname {Var} (X)=np(1-p).

Proof: Let $X=X_{1}+\cdots +X_{n}$ where all $X_{i}$ are independently Bernoulli distributed random variables. Since $\operatorname {Var} (X_{i})=p(1-p)$ , we get:

\operatorname {Var} (X)=\operatorname {Var} (X_{1}+\cdots +X_{n})=\operatorname {Var} (X_{1})+\cdots +\operatorname {Var} (X_{n})=n\operatorname {Var} (X_{1})=np(1-p).

Mode

Usually the mode of a binomial B(n, p) distribution is equal to $\lfloor (n+1)p\rfloor$ , where $\lfloor \cdot \rfloor$ is the floor function. However, when (n + 1)p is an integer and p is neither 0 nor 1, then the distribution has two modes: (n + 1)p and (n + 1)p − 1. When p is equal to 0 or 1, the mode will be 0 and n correspondingly. These cases can be summarized as follows:

{\text{mode}}={\begin{cases}\lfloor (n+1)\,p\rfloor &{\text{if }}(n+1)p{\text{ is 0 or a noninteger}},\\(n+1)\,p\ {\text{ and }}\ (n+1)\,p-1&{\text{if }}(n+1)p\in \{1,\dots ,n\},\\n&{\text{if }}(n+1)p=n+1.\end{cases}}

Proof: Let

f(k)={\binom {n}{k}}p^{k}q^{n-k}.

For $p=0$ only $f(0)$ has a nonzero value with $f(0)=1$ . For $p=1$ we find $f(n)=1$ and $f(k)=0$ for $k\neq n$ . This proves that the mode is 0 for $p=0$ and $n$ for $p=1$ .

Let $0<p<1$ . We find

{\frac {f(k+1)}{f(k)}}={\frac {(n-k)p}{(k+1)(1-p)}}

.

From this follows

{\begin{aligned}k>(n+1)p-1\Rightarrow f(k+1)<f(k)\\k=(n+1)p-1\Rightarrow f(k+1)=f(k)\\k<(n+1)p-1\Rightarrow f(k+1)>f(k)\end{aligned}}

So when $(n+1)p-1$ is an integer, then $(n+1)p-1$ and $(n+1)p$ is a mode. In the case that $(n+1)p-1\notin \mathbb {Z}$ , then only $\lfloor (n+1)p-1\rfloor +1=\lfloor (n+1)p\rfloor$ is a mode.^[4]

Median

In general, there is no single formula to find the median for a binomial distribution, and it may even be non-unique. However several special results have been established:

If np is an integer, then the mean, median, and mode coincide and equal np.^[5]^[6]
Any median m must lie within the interval ⌊np⌋ ≤ m ≤ ⌈np⌉.^[7]
A median m cannot lie too far away from the mean: |m − np| ≤ min{ ln 2, max{p, 1 − p} }.^[8]
The median is unique and equal to m = round(np) in cases when either p ≤ 1 − ln 2 or p ≥ ln 2 or |m − np| ≤ min{p, 1 − p} (except for the case when p = ½ and n is odd).^[7]^[8]
When p = 1/2 and n is odd, any number m in the interval ½(n − 1) ≤ m ≤ ½(n + 1) is a median of the binomial distribution. If p = 1/2 and n is even, then m = n/2 is the unique median.

Covariance between two binomials

If two binomially distributed random variables X and Y are observed together, estimating their covariance can be useful. The covariance is

\operatorname {Cov} (X,Y)=\operatorname {E} (XY)-\mu _{X}\mu _{Y}.

In the case n = 1 (the case of Bernoulli trials) XY is non-zero only when both X and Y are one, and μ_X and μ_Y are equal to the two probabilities. Defining p_B as the probability of both happening at the same time, this gives

\operatorname {Cov} (X,Y)=p_{B}-p_{X}p_{Y},

and for n independent pairwise trials

\operatorname {Cov} (X,Y)_{n}=n(p_{B}-p_{X}p_{Y}).

If X and Y are the same variable, this reduces to the variance formula given above.

Related distributions

Sums of binomials

If X ~ B(n, p) and Y ~ B(m, p) are independent binomial variables with the same probability p, then X + Y is again a binomial variable; its distribution is Z=X+Y ~ B(n+m, p):

{\begin{aligned}\operatorname {P} (Z=k)&=\sum _{i=0}^{k}\left[{\binom {n}{i}}p^{i}(1-p)^{n-i}\right]\left[{\binom {m}{k-i}}p^{k-i}(1-p)^{m-k+i}\right]\\&={\binom {n+m}{k}}p^{k}(1-p)^{n+m-k}\end{aligned}}

However, if X and Y do not have the same probability p, then the variance of the sum will be smaller than the variance of a binomial variable distributed as $B(n+m,{\bar {p}}).\,$

Ratio of two binomial distributions

This result was first derived by Katz et al in 1978.^[9]

Let p₁ and p₂ be the probabilities of success in the binomial distributions B(X,n) and B(Y,m) respectively. Let T = (X/n)/(Y/m).

Then log(T) is approximately normally distributed with mean log(p₁/p₂) and variance ((1/p₁) - 1)/n + ((1/p₂) - 1)/m.

Conditional binomials

If X ~ B(n, p) and, conditional on X, Y ~ B(X, q), then Y is a simple binomial variable with distribution Y ~ B(n, pq).

For example, imagine throwing n balls to a basket U_X and taking the balls that hit and throwing them to another basket U_Y. If p is the probability to hit U_X then X ~ B(n, p) is the number of balls that hit U_X. If q is the probability to hit U_Y then the number of balls that hit U_Y is Y ~ B(X, q) and therefore Y ~ B(n, pq).

[Proof]

Since $X\sim B(n,p)$ and $Y\sim B(X,q)$ , by the law of total probability,

{\begin{aligned}\Pr[Y=m]&=\sum _{k=m}^{n}\Pr[Y=m\mid X=k]\Pr[X=k]\\[2pt]&=\sum _{k=m}^{n}{\binom {n}{k}}{\binom {k}{m}}p^{k}q^{m}(1-p)^{n-k}(1-q)^{k-m}\\\end{aligned}}

Since $\scriptstyle {\binom {n}{k}}{\binom {k}{m}}={\binom {n}{m}}{\binom {n-m}{k-m}}$ , the equation above can be expressed as

\Pr[Y=m]=\sum _{k=m}^{n}{\binom {n}{m}}{\binom {n-m}{k-m}}p^{k}q^{m}(1-p)^{n-k}(1-q)^{k-m}

Factoring $p^{k}=p^{m}p^{k-m}$ and pulling all the terms that don't depend on $k$ out of the sum now yields

{\begin{aligned}\Pr[Y=m]&={\binom {n}{m}}p^{m}q^{m}\left(\sum _{k=m}^{n}{\binom {n-m}{k-m}}p^{k-m}(1-p)^{n-k}(1-q)^{k-m}\right)\\[2pt]&={\binom {n}{m}}(pq)^{m}\left(\sum _{k=m}^{n}{\binom {n-m}{k-m}}\left(p(1-q)\right)^{k-m}(1-p)^{n-k}\right)\end{aligned}}

After substituting $i=k-m$ in the expression above, we get

\Pr[Y=m]={\binom {n}{m}}(pq)^{m}\left(\sum _{i=0}^{n-m}{\binom {n-m}{i}}(p-pq)^{i}(1-p)^{n-m-i}\right)

Notice that the sum (in the parentheses) above equals $(p-pq+1-p)^{n-m}$ by the binomial theorem. Substituting this in finally yields

{\begin{aligned}\Pr[Y=m]&={\binom {n}{m}}(pq)^{m}(p-pq+1-p)^{n-m}\\[4pt]&={\binom {n}{m}}(pq)^{m}(1-pq)^{n-m}\end{aligned}}

and thus $Y\sim B(n,pq)$ as desired.

Bernoulli distribution

The Bernoulli distribution is a special case of the binomial distribution, where n = 1. Symbolically, X ~ B(1, p) has the same meaning as X ~ B(p). Conversely, any binomial distribution, B(n, p), is the distribution of the sum of n Bernoulli trials, B(p), each with the same probability p.^[10]

Poisson binomial distribution

The binomial distribution is a special case of the Poisson binomial distribution, or general binomial distribution, which is the distribution of a sum of n independent non-identical Bernoulli trials B(p_i).^[11]

Normal approximation

Binomial probability mass function and normal probability density function approximation for n = 6 and p = 0.5

If n is large enough, then the skew of the distribution is not too great. In this case a reasonable approximation to B(n, p) is given by the normal distribution

{\mathcal {N}}(np,\,np(1-p)),

and this basic approximation can be improved in a simple way by using a suitable continuity correction. The basic approximation generally improves as n increases (at least 20) and is better when p is not near to 0 or 1.^[12] Various rules of thumb may be used to decide whether n is large enough, and p is far enough from the extremes of zero or one:

One rule^[12] is that for n > 5 the normal approximation is adequate if the absolute value of the skewness is strictly less than 1/3; that is, if

{\frac {|1-2p|}{\sqrt {np(1-p)}}}={\frac {1}{\sqrt {n}}}\left|{\sqrt {\frac {1-p}{p}}}-{\sqrt {\frac {p}{1-p}}}\,\right|<{\frac {1}{3}}.

A stronger rule states that the normal approximation is appropriate only if everything within 3 standard deviations of its mean is within the range of possible values; that is, only if

\mu \pm 3\sigma =np\pm 3{\sqrt {np(1-p)}}\in (0,n).

This 3-standard-deviation rule is equivalent to the following conditions, which also imply the first rule above.

n>9\,{\frac {1-p}{p}}\quad {\hbox{and}}\quad n>9\,{\frac {p}{1-p}}.

[Proof]

The rule $np\pm 3{\sqrt {np(1-p)}}\in (0,n)$ is totally equivalent to request that

np-3{\sqrt {np(1-p)}}>0\quad {\hbox{and}}\quad np+3{\sqrt {np(1-p)}}<n.

Moving terms around yields:

np>3{\sqrt {np(1-p)}}\quad {\hbox{and}}\quad n(1-p)>3{\sqrt {np(1-p)}}.

Since $0<p<1$ , we can apply the square power and divide by the respective factors $np^{2}$ and $n(1-p)^{2}$ , to obtain the desired conditions:

n>9\,{\frac {1-p}{p}}\quad {\hbox{and}}\quad n>9\,{\frac {p}{1-p}}.

Notice that these conditions automatically imply that $n>9$ . On the other hand, apply again the square root and divide by 3,

{\frac {\sqrt {n}}{3}}>{\sqrt {\frac {1-p}{p}}}>0\quad {\hbox{and}}\quad {\frac {\sqrt {n}}{3}}>{\sqrt {\frac {p}{1-p}}}>0.

Subtracting the second set of inequalities from the first one yields:

{\frac {\sqrt {n}}{3}}>{\sqrt {\frac {1-p}{p}}}-{\sqrt {\frac {p}{1-p}}}>-{\frac {\sqrt {n}}{3}};

and so, the desired first rule is satisfied,

\left|{\sqrt {\frac {1-p}{p}}}-{\sqrt {\frac {p}{1-p}}}\,\right|<{\frac {\sqrt {n}}{3}}.

Another commonly used rule is that both values $np$ and $n(1-p)$ must be greater than or equal to 5. However, the specific number varies from source to source, and depends on how good an approximation one wants. In particular, if one uses 9 instead of 5, the rule implies the results stated in the previous paragraphs.

[Proof]

Assume that both values $np$ and $n(1-p)$ are greater than 9. Since $0<p<1$ , we easily have that

np\geq 9>9(1-p)\quad {\hbox{and}}\quad n(1-p)\geq 9>9p.

We only have to divide now by the respective factors $p$ and $1-p$ , to deduce the alternative form of the 3-standard-deviation rule:

n>9\,{\frac {1-p}{p}}\quad {\hbox{and}}\quad n>9\,{\frac {p}{1-p}}.

The following is an example of applying a continuity correction. Suppose one wishes to calculate Pr(X ≤ 8) for a binomial random variable X. If Y has a distribution given by the normal approximation, then Pr(X ≤ 8) is approximated by Pr(Y ≤ 8.5). The addition of 0.5 is the continuity correction; the uncorrected normal approximation gives considerably less accurate results.

This approximation, known as de Moivre–Laplace theorem, is a huge time-saver when undertaking calculations by hand (exact calculations with large n are very onerous); historically, it was the first use of the normal distribution, introduced in Abraham de Moivre's book The Doctrine of Chances in 1738. Nowadays, it can be seen as a consequence of the central limit theorem since B(n, p) is a sum of n independent, identically distributed Bernoulli variables with parameter p. This fact is the basis of a hypothesis test, a "proportion z-test", for the value of p using x/n, the sample proportion and estimator of p, in a common test statistic.^[13]

For example, suppose one randomly samples n people out of a large population and ask them whether they agree with a certain statement. The proportion of people who agree will of course depend on the sample. If groups of n people were sampled repeatedly and truly randomly, the proportions would follow an approximate normal distribution with mean equal to the true proportion p of agreement in the population and with standard deviation $\sigma ={\sqrt {\frac {p(1-p)}{n}}}$

Poisson approximation

The binomial distribution converges towards the Poisson distribution as the number of trials goes to infinity while the product np remains fixed or at least p tends to zero. Therefore, the Poisson distribution with parameter λ = np can be used as an approximation to B(n, p) of the binomial distribution if n is sufficiently large and p is sufficiently small. According to two rules of thumb, this approximation is good if n ≥ 20 and p ≤ 0.05, or if n ≥ 100 and np ≤ 10.^[14]

Concerning the accuracy of Poisson approximation, see Novak,^[15] ch. 4, and references therein.

Limiting distributions

Poisson limit theorem: As n approaches ∞ and p approaches 0 with the product np held fixed, the Binomial(n, p) distribution approaches the Poisson distribution with expected value λ = np.^[14]
de Moivre–Laplace theorem: As n approaches ∞ while p remains fixed, the distribution of

{\frac {X-np}{\sqrt {np(1-p)}}}

approaches the normal distribution with expected value 0 and variance 1. This result is sometimes loosely stated by saying that the distribution of X is asymptotically normal with expected value np and variance np(1 − p). This result is a specific case of the central limit theorem.

Beta distribution

Beta distributions provide a family of prior probability distributions for binomial distributions in Bayesian inference:^[16]

P(p;\alpha ,\beta )={\frac {p^{\alpha -1}(1-p)^{\beta -1}}{\mathrm {B} (\alpha ,\beta )}}

.

Confidence intervals

Even for quite large values of n, the actual distribution of the mean is significantly nonnormal.^[17] Because of this problem several methods to estimate confidence intervals have been proposed.

In the equations for confidence intervals below, the variables have the following meaning:

n₁ is the number of successes out of n, the total number of trials
${\hat {p}}={\frac {n_{1}}{n}}$ is the proportion of successes
$z$ is the $1-{\tfrac {1}{2}}\alpha$ quantile of a standard normal distribution (i.e., probit) corresponding to the target error rate $\alpha$ . For example, for a 95% confidence level the error $\alpha$ = 0.05, so $1-{\tfrac {1}{2}}\alpha$ = 0.975 and $z$ = 1.96.

Wald method

{\hat {p}}\pm z{\sqrt {\frac {{\hat {p}}(1-{\hat {p}})}{n}}}.

A continuity correction of 0.5/n may be added.

Agresti–Coull method^[18]

{\tilde {p}}\pm z{\sqrt {\frac {{\tilde {p}}(1-{\tilde {p}})}{n+z^{2}}}}.

Here the estimate of p is modified to

{\tilde {p}}={\frac {n_{1}+{\frac {1}{2}}z^{2}}{n+z^{2}}}

ArcSine method^[19]

\sin ^{2}\left(\arcsin \left({\sqrt {\hat {p}}}\right)\pm {\frac {z}{2{\sqrt {n}}}}\right)

Wilson (score) method^[20]

The notation in the formula below differs from the previous formulas in two respects:

Firstly, z_x has a slightly different interpretation in the formula below: it has its ordinary meaning of 'the xth quantile of the standard normal distribution', rather than being a shorthand for 'the (1 − x)-th quantile'.

Secondly, this formula does not use a plus-minus to define the two bounds. Instead, one may use $z=z_{\alpha /2}$ to get the lower bound, or use $z=z_{1-\alpha /2}$ to get the upper bound. For example: for a 95% confidence level the error $\alpha$ = 0.05, so one gets the lower bound by using $z=z_{\alpha /2}=z_{0.025}=-1.96$ , and one gets the upper bound by using $z=z_{1-\alpha /2}=z_{0.975}=1.96$ .

{\frac {{\hat {p}}+{\frac {z^{2}}{2n}}+z{\sqrt {{\frac {{\hat {p}}(1-{\hat {p}})}{n}}+{\frac {z^{2}}{4n^{2}}}}}}{1+{\frac {z^{2}}{n}}}}

^[21]

Comparison

The exact (Clopper–Pearson) method is the most conservative.^[17]

The Wald method, although commonly recommended in textbooks, is the most biased.

Generating binomial random variates

Methods for random number generation where the marginal distribution is a binomial distribution are well-established.^[22]^[23]

One way to generate random samples from a binomial distribution is to use an inversion algorithm. To do so, one must calculate the probability that P(X=k) for all values k from 0 through n. (These probabilities should sum to a value close to one, in order to encompass the entire sample space.) Then by using a pseudorandom number generator to generate samples uniformly between 0 and 1, one can transform the calculated samples U[0,1] into discrete numbers by using the probabilities calculated in step one.

Tail bounds

For k ≤ np, upper bounds for the lower tail of the distribution function can be derived. Recall that $F(k;n,p)=\Pr(X\leq k)$ , the probability that there are at most k successes.

Hoeffding's inequality yields the bound

F(k;n,p)\leq \exp \left(-2{\frac {(np-k)^{2}}{n}}\right),\!

and Chernoff's inequality can be used to derive the bound

F(k;n,p)\leq \exp \left(-{\frac {1}{2\,p}}{\frac {(np-k)^{2}}{n}}\right).\!

Moreover, these bounds are reasonably tight when p = 1/2, since the following expression holds for all k ≥ 3n/8^[24]

F(k;n,{\tfrac {1}{2}})\leq {\frac {14}{15}}\exp \left(-{\frac {16({\frac {n}{2}}-k)^{2}}{n}}\right).\!

However, the bounds do not work well for extreme values of p. In particular, as p $\rightarrow$ 1, value F(k;n,p) goes to zero (for fixed k, n with k < n) while the upper bound above goes to a positive constant. In this case a better bound is given by ^[25]

F(k;n,p)\leq \exp \left(-nD\left({\frac {k}{n}}\left|\right|p\right)\right)\quad \quad {\mbox{if }}0<{\frac {k}{n}}<p\!

where D(a || p) is the relative entropy between an a-coin and a p-coin (i.e. between the Bernoulli(a) and Bernoulli(p) distribution):

D(a||p)=(a)\log {\frac {a}{p}}+(1-a)\log {\frac {1-a}{1-p}}.\!

Asymptotically, this bound is reasonably tight; see ^[25] for details. An equivalent formulation of the bound is

\Pr(X\geq k)=F(n-k;n,1-p)\leq \exp \left(-nD\left({\frac {k}{n}}\left|\right|p\right)\right)\quad \quad {\mbox{if }}p<{\frac {k}{n}}<1.\!

Both these bounds are derived directly from the Chernoff bound. It can also be shown that,

\Pr(X\geq k)=F(n-k;n,1-p)\geq {\frac {1}{(n+1)^{2}}}\exp \left(-nD\left({\frac {k}{n}}\left|\right|p\right)\right)\quad \quad {\mbox{if }}p<{\frac {k}{n}}<1.\!

This is proved using the method of types (see for example chapter 12 of Elements of Information Theory by Cover and Thomas ^[26]).

We can also change the $(n+1)^{2}$ in the denominator to ${\sqrt {2n}}$ , by approximating the binomial coefficient with Stirling's formula.^[27]

History

This distribution was derived by James Bernoulli. He considered the case where p = r/(r + s) where p is the probability of success and r and s are positive integers. Blaise Pascal had earlier considered the case where p = 1/2.

References

↑ Wadsworth, G. P. (1960). Introduction to Probability and Random Variables. New York: McGraw-Hill. p. 52.
↑ Hamilton Institute. "The Binomial Distribution" October 20, 2010.
↑ See Proof Wiki
↑ See also the answer to the question "finding mode in Binomial distribution"
↑ Neumann, P. (1966). "Über den Median der Binomial- and Poissonverteilung". Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift der Technischen Universität Dresden (in German). 19: 29–33.
↑ Lord, Nick. (July 2010). "Binomial averages when the mean is an integer", The Mathematical Gazette 94, 331-332.
1 2 Kaas, R.; Buhrman, J.M. (1980). "Mean, Median and Mode in Binomial Distributions". Statistica Neerlandica. 34 (1): 13–18. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9574.1980.tb00681.x.
1 2 Hamza, K. (1995). "The smallest uniform upper bound on the distance between the mean and the median of the binomial and Poisson distributions". Statistics & Probability Letters. 23: 21–25. doi:10.1016/0167-7152(94)00090-U.
↑ Katz D. et al.(1978) Obtaining confidence intervals for the risk ratio in cohort studies. Biometrics 34:469–474
↑ Taboga, Marco. "Lectures on Probability Theory and Mathematical Statistics". statlect.com. Retrieved 18 December 2017.
↑ Wang, Y. H. (1993). "On the number of successes in independent trials" (PDF). Statistica Sinica. 3 (2): 295–312. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-03-03.
1 2 Box, Hunter and Hunter (1978). Statistics for experimenters. Wiley. p. 130.
↑ NIST/SEMATECH, "7.2.4. Does the proportion of defectives meet requirements?" e-Handbook of Statistical Methods.
1 2 NIST/SEMATECH, "6.3.3.1. Counts Control Charts", e-Handbook of Statistical Methods.
↑ Novak S.Y. (2011) Extreme value methods with applications to finance. London: CRC/ Chapman & Hall/Taylor & Francis. ISBN 9781-43983-5746.
↑ MacKay, David (2003). Information Theory, Inference and Learning Algorithms. Cambridge University Press; First Edition. ISBN 978-0521642989.
1 2 Brown, Lawrence D.; Cai, T. Tony; DasGupta, Anirban (2001), "Interval Estimation for a Binomial Proportion", Statistical Science, 16 (2): 101–133, CiteSeerX 10.1.1.323.7752, doi:10.1214/ss/1009213286, retrieved 2015-01-05
↑ Agresti, Alan; Coull, Brent A. (May 1998), "Approximate is better than 'exact' for interval estimation of binomial proportions" (PDF), The American Statistician, 52 (2): 119–126, doi:10.2307/2685469, retrieved 2015-01-05
↑ Pires MA Confidence intervals for a binomial proportion: comparison of methods and software evaluation.
↑ Wilson, Edwin B. (June 1927), "Probable inference, the law of succession, and statistical inference" (PDF), Journal of the American Statistical Association, 22 (158): 209–212, doi:10.2307/2276774, archived from the original (PDF) on 2015-01-13, retrieved 2015-01-05
↑ "Confidence intervals". Engineering Statistics Handbook. NIST/Sematech. 2012. Retrieved 2017-07-23.
↑ Devroye, Luc (1986) Non-Uniform Random Variate Generation, New York: Springer-Verlag. (See especially Chapter X, Discrete Univariate Distributions)
↑ Kachitvichyanukul, V.; Schmeiser, B. W. (1988). "Binomial random variate generation". Communications of the ACM. 31 (2): 216–222. doi:10.1145/42372.42381.
↑ Matoušek, J, Vondrak, J: The Probabilistic Method (lecture notes) .
1 2 R. Arratia and L. Gordon: Tutorial on large deviations for the binomial distribution, Bulletin of Mathematical Biology 51(1) (1989), 125–131 .
↑ Theorem 11.1.3 in Cover, T.; Thomas, J. (2006). Elements of Information Theory (2nd ed.). Wiley. p. 350.
↑ "Sharper Lower Bounds for Binomial/Chernoff Tails". math.stackexchange.com.
↑ Mandelbrot, B. B., Fisher, A. J., & Calvet, L. E. (1997). A multifractal model of asset returns. 3.2 The Binomial Measure is the Simplest Example of a Multifractal

External links

Interactive graphic: Univariate Distribution Relationships
Binomial distribution formula calculator
Difference of two binomial variables: X-Y or |X-Y|
Querying the binomial probability distribution in WolframAlpha

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.

[1] Wadsworth, G. P. (1960). Introduction to Probability and Random Variables. New York: McGraw-Hill. p. 52.

[2] Hamilton Institute. "The Binomial Distribution" October 20, 2010.

[3] See Proof Wiki

[4] See also the answer to the question "finding mode in Binomial distribution"

[5] Neumann, P. (1966). "Über den Median der Binomial- and Poissonverteilung". Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift der Technischen Universität Dresden (in German). 19: 29–33.

[6] Lord, Nick. (July 2010). "Binomial averages when the mean is an integer", The Mathematical Gazette 94, 331-332.

[KaasBuhrman-7] 1 2 Kaas, R.; Buhrman, J.M. (1980). "Mean, Median and Mode in Binomial Distributions". Statistica Neerlandica. 34 (1): 13–18. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9574.1980.tb00681.x.

[Hamza-8] 1 2 Hamza, K. (1995). "The smallest uniform upper bound on the distance between the mean and the median of the binomial and Poisson distributions". Statistics & Probability Letters. 23: 21–25. doi:10.1016/0167-7152(94)00090-U.

[Katz1978-9] Katz D. et al.(1978) Obtaining confidence intervals for the risk ratio in cohort studies. Biometrics 34:469–474

[10] Taboga, Marco. "Lectures on Probability Theory and Mathematical Statistics". statlect.com. Retrieved 18 December 2017.

[11] Wang, Y. H. (1993). "On the number of successes in independent trials" (PDF). Statistica Sinica. 3 (2): 295–312. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-03-03.

[bhh-12] 1 2 Box, Hunter and Hunter (1978). Statistics for experimenters. Wiley. p. 130.

[13] NIST/SEMATECH, "7.2.4. Does the proportion of defectives meet requirements?" e-Handbook of Statistical Methods.

[nist-14] 1 2 NIST/SEMATECH, "6.3.3.1. Counts Control Charts", e-Handbook of Statistical Methods.

[15] Novak S.Y. (2011) Extreme value methods with applications to finance. London: CRC/ Chapman & Hall/Taylor & Francis. ISBN 9781-43983-5746.

[MacKay-16] MacKay, David (2003). Information Theory, Inference and Learning Algorithms. Cambridge University Press; First Edition. ISBN 978-0521642989.

[Brown2001-17] 1 2 Brown, Lawrence D.; Cai, T. Tony; DasGupta, Anirban (2001), "Interval Estimation for a Binomial Proportion", Statistical Science, 16 (2): 101–133, CiteSeerX 10.1.1.323.7752, doi:10.1214/ss/1009213286, retrieved 2015-01-05

[Agresti1988-18] Agresti, Alan; Coull, Brent A. (May 1998), "Approximate is better than 'exact' for interval estimation of binomial proportions" (PDF), The American Statistician, 52 (2): 119–126, doi:10.2307/2685469, retrieved 2015-01-05

[Pires00-19] Pires MA Confidence intervals for a binomial proportion: comparison of methods and software evaluation.

[Wilson1927-20] Wilson, Edwin B. (June 1927), "Probable inference, the law of succession, and statistical inference" (PDF), Journal of the American Statistical Association, 22 (158): 209–212, doi:10.2307/2276774, archived from the original (PDF) on 2015-01-13, retrieved 2015-01-05

[21] "Confidence intervals". Engineering Statistics Handbook. NIST/Sematech. 2012. Retrieved 2017-07-23.

[22] Devroye, Luc (1986) Non-Uniform Random Variate Generation, New York: Springer-Verlag. (See especially Chapter X, Discrete Univariate Distributions)

[23] Kachitvichyanukul, V.; Schmeiser, B. W. (1988). "Binomial random variate generation". Communications of the ACM. 31 (2): 216–222. doi:10.1145/42372.42381.

[24] Matoušek, J, Vondrak, J: The Probabilistic Method (lecture notes) .

[ag-25] 1 2 R. Arratia and L. Gordon: Tutorial on large deviations for the binomial distribution, Bulletin of Mathematical Biology 51(1) (1989), 125–131 .

[ct-26] Theorem 11.1.3 in Cover, T.; Thomas, J. (2006). Elements of Information Theory (2nd ed.). Wiley. p. 350.

[ta-27] "Sharper Lower Bounds for Binomial/Chernoff Tails". math.stackexchange.com.

[28] Mandelbrot, B. B., Fisher, A. J., & Calvet, L. E. (1997). A multifractal model of asset returns. 3.2 The Binomial Measure is the Simplest Example of a Multifractal

Probability distributions
List
Discrete univariate with finite support	Benford Bernoulli beta-binomial binomial categorical hypergeometric Poisson binomial Rademacher discrete uniform Zipf Zipf–Mandelbrot
Discrete univariate with infinite support	beta negative binomial Borel Conway–Maxwell–Poisson discrete phase-type Delaporte extended negative binomial Gauss–Kuzmin geometric logarithmic negative binomial parabolic fractal Poisson Skellam Yule–Simon zeta
Continuous univariate supported on a bounded interval	arcsine ARGUS Balding–Nichols Bates beta beta rectangular Irwin–Hall Kumaraswamy logit-normal noncentral beta raised cosine reciprocal triangular U-quadratic uniform Wigner semicircle
Continuous univariate supported on a semi-infinite interval	Benini Benktander 1st kind Benktander 2nd kind beta prime Burr chi-squared chi Dagum Davis exponential-logarithmic Erlang exponential F folded normal Flory–Schulz Fréchet gamma gamma/Gompertz generalized inverse Gaussian Gompertz half-logistic half-normal Hotelling's T-squared hyper-Erlang hyperexponential hypoexponential inverse chi-squared scaled inverse chi-squared inverse Gaussian inverse gamma Kolmogorov Lévy log-Cauchy log-Laplace log-logistic log-normal Lomax matrix-exponential Maxwell–Boltzmann Maxwell–Jüttner Mittag-Leffler Nakagami noncentral chi-squared Pareto phase-type poly-Weibull Rayleigh relativistic Breit–Wigner Rice shifted Gompertz truncated normal type-2 Gumbel Weibull Discrete Weibull Wilks's lambda
Continuous univariate supported on the whole real line	Cauchy exponential power Fisher's z Gaussian q generalized normal generalized hyperbolic geometric stable Gumbel Holtsmark hyperbolic secant Johnson's S_U Landau Laplace asymmetric Laplace logistic noncentral t normal (Gaussian) normal-inverse Gaussian skew normal slash stable Student's t type-1 Gumbel Tracy–Widom variance-gamma Voigt
Continuous univariate with support whose type varies	generalized extreme value generalized Pareto Marchenko–Pastur q-exponential q-Gaussian q-Weibull shifted log-logistic Tukey lambda
Mixed continuous-discrete univariate	rectified Gaussian
Multivariate (joint)	Discrete Ewens multinomial Dirichlet-multinomial negative multinomial Continuous Dirichlet generalized Dirichlet multivariate Laplace multivariate normal multivariate stable multivariate t normal-inverse-gamma normal-gamma Matrix-valued inverse matrix gamma inverse-Wishart matrix normal matrix t matrix gamma normal-inverse-Wishart normal-Wishart Wishart
Directional	Univariate (circular) directional Circular uniform univariate von Mises wrapped normal wrapped Cauchy wrapped exponential wrapped asymmetric Laplace wrapped Lévy Bivariate (spherical) Kent Bivariate (toroidal) bivariate von Mises Multivariate von Mises–Fisher Bingham
Degenerate and singular	Degenerate Dirac delta function Singular Cantor
Families	Circular compound Poisson elliptical exponential natural exponential location–scale maximum entropy mixture Pearson Tweedie wrapped

Binomial distribution

Specification

Probability mass function

Cumulative distribution function

Example

Mean

Variance

Mode

Median

Covariance between two binomials

Related distributions

Sums of binomials

Ratio of two binomial distributions

Conditional binomials

Bernoulli distribution

Poisson binomial distribution

Normal approximation

Poisson approximation

Limiting distributions

Beta distribution

Confidence intervals

Wald method

Agresti–Coull method[18]

ArcSine method[19]

Wilson (score) method[20]

Comparison

Generating binomial random variates

Tail bounds

History

See also

References

External links

Agresti–Coull method^[18]

ArcSine method^[19]

Wilson (score) method^[20]