Laplace distribution

Laplace
	Probability density function
	Cumulative distribution function
Parameters	location (real); scale (real)
Support
PDF
CDF
Mean
Median
Mode
Variance
Skewness
Ex. kurtosis
Entropy
MGF
CF

In probability theory and statistics, the Laplace distribution is a continuous probability distribution named after Pierre-Simon Laplace. It is also sometimes called the double exponential distribution, because it can be thought of as two exponential distributions (with an additional location parameter) spliced together back-to-back, although the term is also sometimes used to refer to the Gumbel distribution. The difference between two independent identically distributed exponential random variables is governed by a Laplace distribution, as is a Brownian motion evaluated at an exponentially distributed random time. Increments of Laplace motion or a variance gamma process evaluated over the time scale also have a Laplace distribution.

Characterization

Probability density function

A random variable has a ${\textrm {Laplace}}(\mu ,b)$ distribution if its probability density function is

f(x\mid \mu ,b)={\frac {1}{2b}}\exp \left(-{\frac {|x-\mu |}{b}}\right)\,\!

={\frac {1}{2b}}\left\{{\begin{matrix}\exp \left(-{\frac {\mu -x}{b}}\right)&{\text{if }}x<\mu \\[8pt]\exp \left(-{\frac {x-\mu }{b}}\right)&{\text{if }}x\geq \mu \end{matrix}}\right.

Here, $\mu$ is a location parameter and $b > 0$ , which is sometimes referred to as the diversity, is a scale parameter. If $\mu =0$ and $b=1$ , the positive half-line is exactly an exponential distribution scaled by 1/2.

The probability density function of the Laplace distribution is also reminiscent of the normal distribution; however, whereas the normal distribution is expressed in terms of the squared difference from the mean $\mu$ , the Laplace density is expressed in terms of the absolute difference from the mean. Consequently, the Laplace distribution has fatter tails than the normal distribution.

Cumulative distribution function

The Laplace distribution is easy to integrate (if one distinguishes two symmetric cases) due to the use of the absolute value function. Its cumulative distribution function is as follows:

\begin{align} F(x) &= \int_{-\infty}^x \!\!f(u)\,\mathrm{d}u = \begin{cases} \frac12 \exp \left( \frac{x-\mu}{b} \right) & \mbox{if }x < \mu \\ 1-\frac12 \exp \left( -\frac{x-\mu}{b} \right) & \mbox{if }x \geq \mu \end{cases} \\ &=\tfrac{1}{2} + \tfrac{1}{2} \sgn(x-\mu) \left(1-\exp \left(-\frac{|x-\mu|}{b} \right ) \right ). \end{align}

The inverse cumulative distribution function is given by

F^{-1}(p) = \mu - b\,\sgn(p-0.5)\,\ln(1 - 2|p-0.5|).

Generating random variables according to the Laplace distribution

Given a random variable $U$ drawn from the uniform distribution in the interval $\left(-1/2,1/2\right]$ , the random variable

X=\mu - b\,\sgn(U)\,\ln(1 - 2|U|)

has a Laplace distribution with parameters $\mu$ and $b$ . This follows from the inverse cumulative distribution function given above.

A ${\textrm {Laplace}}(0,b)$ variate can also be generated as the difference of two i.i.d. ${\textrm {Exponential}}(1/b)$ random variables. Equivalently, ${\textrm {Laplace}}(0,1)$ can also be generated as the logarithm of the ratio of two i.i.d. uniform random variables.

Parameter estimation

Given $N$ independent and identically distributed samples $x_{1},x_{2},...,x_{N}$ , the maximum likelihood estimator ${\hat {\mu }}$ of $\mu$ is the sample median,^[1] and the maximum likelihood estimator $\hat{b}$ of $b$ is the Mean Absolute Deviation from the Median

\hat{b} = \frac{1}{N} \sum_{i = 1}^{N} |x_i - \hat{\mu}|

(revealing a link between the Laplace distribution and least absolute deviations).

Moments

\mu _{r}'={\bigg (}{\frac {1}{2}}{\bigg )}\sum _{k=0}^{r}{\bigg [}{\frac {r!}{(r-k)!}}b^{k}\mu ^{(r-k)}\{1+(-1)^{k}\}{\bigg ]}={\frac {m^{n+1}}{2b}}\left(e^{m/b}E_{-n}(m/b)-e^{-m/b}E_{-n}(-m/b)\right)

where $E_{n}()$ is the generalized exponential integral function $E_{n}(x)=x^{n-1}\Gamma (1-n,x)$ .

Related distributions

If $X\sim {\textrm {Laplace}}(\mu ,b)$ then $kX+c\sim {\textrm {Laplace}}(k\mu +c,kb)$ .
If $X\sim {\textrm {Laplace}}(0,b)$ then $\left|X\right|\sim {\textrm {Exponential}}\left(b^{-1}\right)$ . (Exponential distribution)
If $X,Y\sim {\textrm {Exponential}}(\lambda )$ then $X-Y\sim {\textrm {Laplace}}\left(0,\lambda ^{-1}\right)$ ．
If $X\sim {\textrm {Laplace}}(\mu ,b)$ then $\left|X-\mu \right|\sim {\textrm {Exponential}}(b^{-1})$ .
If $X\sim {\textrm {Laplace}}(\mu ,b)$ then $X\sim {\textrm {EPD}}(\mu ,b,0)$ . (Exponential power distribution)
If $X_{1},...,X_{4}\sim {\textrm {N}}(0,1)$ (Normal distribution) then $X_{1}X_{2}-X_{3}X_{4}\sim {\textrm {Laplace}}(0,1)$ .
If $X_{i}\sim {\textrm {Laplace}}(\mu ,b)$ then ${\frac {\displaystyle 2}{b}}\sum _{i=1}^{n}|X_{i}-\mu |\sim \chi ^{2}(2n)$ . (Chi-squared distribution)
If $X,Y\sim {\textrm {Laplace}}(\mu ,b)$ then ${\tfrac {|X-\mu |}{|Y-\mu |}}\sim \operatorname {F} (2,2)$ . (F-distribution)
If $X,Y\sim {\textrm {U}}(0,1)$ (Uniform distribution) then $\log(X/Y)\sim {\textrm {Laplace}}(0,1)$ .
If $X\sim {\textrm {Exponential}}(\lambda )$ and $Y\sim {\textrm {Bernoulli}}(0.5)$ (Bernoulli distribution) independent of $X$ , then $X(2Y-1)\sim {\textrm {Laplace}}\left(0,\lambda ^{-1}\right)$ .
If $X\sim {\textrm {Exponential}}(\lambda )$ and $Y\sim {\textrm {Exponential}}(\nu )$ independent of $X$ , then $\lambda X-\nu Y\sim {\textrm {Laplace}}(0,1)$ ．
If $X$ has a Rademacher distribution and $Y\sim {\textrm {Exponential}}(\lambda )$ then $XY\sim {\textrm {Laplace}}(0,1/\lambda )$ .
If $V\sim {\textrm {Exponential}}(1)$ and $Z\sim N(0,1)$ independent of $V$ , then $X = \mu + b \sqrt{2 V}Z \sim \mathrm{Laplace}(\mu,b)$ .
If $X\sim {\textrm {GeometricStable}}(2,0,\lambda ,0)$ (geometric stable distribution) then $X\sim {\textrm {Laplace}}(0,\lambda )$ .
The Laplace distribution is a limiting case of the hyperbolic distribution.
If $X|Y\sim {\textrm {N}}(\mu ,\sigma =Y)$ with $Y\sim {\textrm {Rayleigh}}(b)$ (Rayleigh distribution) then $X\sim {\textrm {Laplace}}(\mu ,b)$ .

Relation to the exponential distribution

A Laplace random variable can be represented as the difference of two iid exponential random variables.^[2] One way to show this is by using the characteristic function approach. For any set of independent continuous random variables, for any linear combination of those variables, its characteristic function (which uniquely determines the distribution) can be acquired by multiplying the corresponding characteristic functions.

Consider two i.i.d random variables $X,Y\sim {\textrm {Exponential}}(\lambda )$ . The characteristic functions for $X,-Y$ are

\frac{\lambda }{-i t+\lambda }, \quad \frac{\lambda }{i t+\lambda }

respectively. On multiplying these characteristic functions (equivalent to the characteristic function of the sum of the random variables $X+(-Y)$ ), the result is

{\frac {\lambda ^{2}}{(-it+\lambda )(it+\lambda )}}={\frac {\lambda ^{2}}{t^{2}+\lambda ^{2}}}.

This is the same as the characteristic function for $Z\sim {\textrm {Laplace}}(0,1/\lambda )$ , which is

{\frac {1}{1+{\frac {t^{2}}{\lambda ^{2}}}}}.

Sargan distributions

Sargan distributions are a system of distributions of which the Laplace distribution is a core member. A $p$ th order Sargan distribution has density^[3]^[4]

f_p(x)=\tfrac{1}{2} \exp(-\alpha |x|) \frac{\displaystyle 1+\sum_{j=1}^p \beta_j \alpha^j |x|^j}{\displaystyle 1+\sum_{j=1}^p j!\beta_j},

for parameters $\alpha \geq 0,\beta _{j}\geq 0$ . The Laplace distribution results for $p=0$ .

Applications

The Laplacian distribution has been used in speech recognition to model priors on DFT coefficients ^[5] and in JPEG image compression to model AC coefficients ^[6] generated by a DCT.

The addition of noise drawn from a Laplacian distribution, with scaling parameter appropriate to a function's sensitivity, to the output of a statistical database query is the most common means to provide differential privacy in statistical databases.

Fitted Laplace distribution to maximum one-day rainfalls ^[7]

In regression analysis, the least absolute deviations estimate arises as the maximum likelihood estimate if the errors have a Laplace distribution.

The Lasso can be thought of as a Bayesian regression with a Laplacian prior.

In hydrology the Laplace distribution is applied to extreme events such as annual maximum one-day rainfalls and river discharges. The blue picture, made with CumFreq, illustrates an example of fitting the Laplace distribution to ranked annually maximum one-day rainfalls showing also the 90% confidence belt based on the binomial distribution. The rainfall data are represented by plotting positions as part of the cumulative frequency analysis.

The Laplace distribution, being a composite or double distribution, is applicable in situations where the lower values originate under different external conditions than the higher ones so that they follow a different pattern. ^[8]

History

This distribution is often referred to as Laplace's first law of errors. He published it in 1774 when he noted that the frequency of an error could be expressed as an exponential function of its magnitude once its sign was disregarded.^[9]^[10]

Keynes published a paper in 1911 based on his earlier thesis wherein he showed that the Laplace distribution minimised the absolute deviation from the median.^[11]

References

↑ Robert M. Norton (May 1984). "The Double Exponential Distribution: Using Calculus to Find a Maximum Likelihood Estimator". The American Statistician. American Statistical Association. 38 (2): 135&ndash, 136. doi:10.2307/2683252. JSTOR 2683252.
↑ Kotz, Samuel; Kozubowski, Tomasz J.; Podgórski, Krzysztof (2001). The Laplace distribution and generalizations: a revisit with applications to Communications, Economics, Engineering and Finance. Birkhauser. pp. 23 (Proposition 2.2.2, Equation 2.2.8). ISBN 9780817641665.
↑ Everitt, B.S. (2002) The Cambridge Dictionary of Statistics, CUP. ISBN 0-521-81099-X
↑ Johnson, N.L., Kotz S., Balakrishnan, N. (1994) Continuous Univariate Distributions, Wiley. ISBN 0-471-58495-9. p. 60
↑ Eltoft, T.; Taesu Kim; Te-Won Lee (2006). "On the multivariate Laplace distribution" (PDF). IEEE Signal Processing Letters. 13 (5): 300–303. doi:10.1109/LSP.2006.870353.
↑ Minguillon, J.; Pujol, J. (2001). "JPEG standard uniform quantization error modeling with applications to sequential and progressive operation modes". Journal of Electronic Imaging. 10 (2): 475–485. doi:10.1117/1.1344592.
↑ CumFreq for probability distribution fitting
↑ A collection of composite distributions
↑ Laplace, P-S. (1774). Mémoire sur la probabilité des causes par les évènements. Mémoires de l’Academie Royale des Sciences Presentés par Divers Savan, 6, 621–656
↑ Wilson EB (1923) First and second laws of error. JASA 18, 143
↑ Keynes JM (1911) The principal averages and the laws of error which lead to them. J Roy Stat Soc, 74, 322–331

External links

Hazewinkel, Michiel, ed. (2001) [1994], "Laplace distribution", Encyclopedia of Mathematics, Springer Science+Business Media B.V. / Kluwer Academic Publishers, ISBN 978-1-55608-010-4

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.

[1] Robert M. Norton (May 1984). "The Double Exponential Distribution: Using Calculus to Find a Maximum Likelihood Estimator". The American Statistician. American Statistical Association. 38 (2): 135&ndash, 136. doi:10.2307/2683252. JSTOR 2683252.

[2] Kotz, Samuel; Kozubowski, Tomasz J.; Podgórski, Krzysztof (2001). The Laplace distribution and generalizations: a revisit with applications to Communications, Economics, Engineering and Finance. Birkhauser. pp. 23 (Proposition 2.2.2, Equation 2.2.8). ISBN 9780817641665.

[3] Everitt, B.S. (2002) The Cambridge Dictionary of Statistics, CUP. ISBN 0-521-81099-X

[4] Johnson, N.L., Kotz S., Balakrishnan, N. (1994) Continuous Univariate Distributions, Wiley. ISBN 0-471-58495-9. p. 60

[5] Eltoft, T.; Taesu Kim; Te-Won Lee (2006). "On the multivariate Laplace distribution" (PDF). IEEE Signal Processing Letters. 13 (5): 300–303. doi:10.1109/LSP.2006.870353.

[6] Minguillon, J.; Pujol, J. (2001). "JPEG standard uniform quantization error modeling with applications to sequential and progressive operation modes". Journal of Electronic Imaging. 10 (2): 475–485. doi:10.1117/1.1344592.

[7] CumFreq for probability distribution fitting

[8] A collection of composite distributions

[Laplace1774-9] Laplace, P-S. (1774). Mémoire sur la probabilité des causes par les évènements. Mémoires de l’Academie Royale des Sciences Presentés par Divers Savan, 6, 621–656

[Wilson1923-10] Wilson EB (1923) First and second laws of error. JASA 18, 143

[Keynes1911-11] Keynes JM (1911) The principal averages and the laws of error which lead to them. J Roy Stat Soc, 74, 322–331

Probability distributions
List
Discrete univariate with finite support	Benford Bernoulli beta-binomial binomial categorical hypergeometric Poisson binomial Rademacher discrete uniform Zipf Zipf–Mandelbrot
Discrete univariate with infinite support	beta negative binomial Borel Conway–Maxwell–Poisson discrete phase-type Delaporte extended negative binomial Gauss–Kuzmin geometric logarithmic negative binomial parabolic fractal Poisson Skellam Yule–Simon zeta
Continuous univariate supported on a bounded interval	arcsine ARGUS Balding–Nichols Bates beta beta rectangular Irwin–Hall Kumaraswamy logit-normal noncentral beta raised cosine reciprocal triangular U-quadratic uniform Wigner semicircle
Continuous univariate supported on a semi-infinite interval	Benini Benktander 1st kind Benktander 2nd kind beta prime Burr chi-squared chi Dagum Davis exponential-logarithmic Erlang exponential F folded normal Flory–Schulz Fréchet gamma gamma/Gompertz generalized inverse Gaussian Gompertz half-logistic half-normal Hotelling's T-squared hyper-Erlang hyperexponential hypoexponential inverse chi-squared scaled inverse chi-squared inverse Gaussian inverse gamma Kolmogorov Lévy log-Cauchy log-Laplace log-logistic log-normal Lomax matrix-exponential Maxwell–Boltzmann Maxwell–Jüttner Mittag-Leffler Nakagami noncentral chi-squared Pareto phase-type poly-Weibull Rayleigh relativistic Breit–Wigner Rice shifted Gompertz truncated normal type-2 Gumbel Weibull Discrete Weibull Wilks's lambda
Continuous univariate supported on the whole real line	Cauchy exponential power Fisher's z Gaussian q generalized normal generalized hyperbolic geometric stable Gumbel Holtsmark hyperbolic secant Johnson's S_U Landau Laplace asymmetric Laplace logistic noncentral t normal (Gaussian) normal-inverse Gaussian skew normal slash stable Student's t type-1 Gumbel Tracy–Widom variance-gamma Voigt
Continuous univariate with support whose type varies	generalized extreme value generalized Pareto Marchenko–Pastur q-exponential q-Gaussian q-Weibull shifted log-logistic Tukey lambda
Mixed continuous-discrete univariate	rectified Gaussian
Multivariate (joint)	Discrete Ewens multinomial Dirichlet-multinomial negative multinomial Continuous Dirichlet generalized Dirichlet multivariate Laplace multivariate normal multivariate stable multivariate t normal-inverse-gamma normal-gamma Matrix-valued inverse matrix gamma inverse-Wishart matrix normal matrix t matrix gamma normal-inverse-Wishart normal-Wishart Wishart
Directional	Univariate (circular) directional Circular uniform univariate von Mises wrapped normal wrapped Cauchy wrapped exponential wrapped asymmetric Laplace wrapped Lévy Bivariate (spherical) Kent Bivariate (toroidal) bivariate von Mises Multivariate von Mises–Fisher Bingham
Degenerate and singular	Degenerate Dirac delta function Singular Cantor
Families	Circular compound Poisson elliptical exponential natural exponential location–scale maximum entropy mixture Pearson Tweedie wrapped