Cold-weather warfare

Cold-weather warfare, also known as Arctic warfare or winter warfare, encompasses military operations affected by snow, ice, thawing conditions or cold, both on land and at sea. Cold-weather conditions occur year-round at high elevation or at high latitudes, and elsewhere materialise seasonally during the winter period. Mountain warfare often takes place in cold weather or on terrain that is affected by ice and snow, such as the Alps and the Himalayas. Historically, most such operations have been during winter in the Northern Hemisphere. Some have occurred above the Arctic Circle where snow, ice and cold may occur throughout the year. At times, cold or its aftermath—thaw—has been a decisive factor in the failure of a campaign, as with French invasion of Russia in 1812, the Soviet invasion of Finland in 1939,[1][2] and the German invasion of the Soviet Union during World War II.

Cold-weather warfare
Royal Marine reservists training for winter operations

History

Northern and Eastern Europe were the venues for some well-documented winter campaigns. During World War II several actions took place above the Arctic Circle. Recent cold-weather conflicts have occurred in the Himalayas.

Pre–1800

In 1242, the Teutonic Order lost the Battle on the Ice on Lake Peipus to Novgorod. In 1520, the decisive Battle of Bogesund between Sweden and Denmark occurred on the ice of lake Åsunden.[3]

The 1557 Siege of Katsurayama in was fought between the forces of the Japanese daimyō Takeda Shingen and Uesugi Kenshin as part of the Kawanakajima campaigns. Katsurayama castle was a strategically vital Uesugi stronghold in the contested Shinano Province and, when it was isolated from reinforcements due to late snow in early 1557, the Takeda clan used this opportunity to seize it under Baba Nobuharu, shielded from view by heavy snowfall.[4]

Sweden and Denmark fought several wars during the 16th and 17th centuries. As a great deal of Denmark consists of islands, it was usually safe from invasion, but in January 1658, most of the Danish waters froze. Charles X Gustav of Sweden led his army across the ice of the Belts to besiege Copenhagen. The war ended with the treaty of Roskilde, a treaty very favorable to the Swedish.[5]

During the Great Northern War, Swedish king Charles XII set off to invade Moscow, but was eventually defeated at the Battle of Poltava after being weakened by cold weather and scorched earth tactics. Sweden suffered more casualties during the same war as Carl Gustaf Armfeldt with 6,000 men tried to invade Trondheim. Three thousand of them died of exposure in the snow during the Carolean Death March.[6]

19th century

A bivouac of Napoleon's army during retreat from Russia in 1812.
Japanese troops during the 1895 Battle of Weihaiwei

During the Finnish War, the Russian army unexpectedly crossed the frozen Gulf of Bothnia from Finland to the Åland Islands and, by 19 March 1809, reached the Swedish shore within 70 km from the Swedish capital, Stockholm. This daring maneuvre decided the outcome of the war.[7]

Napoleon's invasion of Russia in 1812 resulted in retreat in the face of winter[8] with the majority of the French army succumbing to frostbite and starvation, rather than combat injuries.[9]

The Battle of Weihaiwei was a battle of the First Sino-Japanese War in the winter of 1895 in Weihai, Shandong Province, China between the forces of the Japan and Qing China. Through a well coordinated offensive of both naval and land forces, hampered by snow and cold, the Japanese destroyed the forts on shore and sank much of the Chinese fleet.[10]

20th century

World War II

Finnish ski troops during the 1939 Winter War.
US Army Sherman tank and infantrymen of the 82nd Airborne Division during the 1944 Battle of the Bulge.

The Finnish Army used ski troops during the Winter War and the Second World War, where the numerically superior, but road-bound Soviet forces were vulnerable to attack by mobile, white-clad ski troops, approaching from untracked, frozen terrain.[11]

The Wehrmacht maintained elite mountain troops, Gebirgsjäger. They were organized in small, specialized units, which relied on pack animals. Typical weapons were light machine guns, mortars, and anti-tank guns. Control of ridge lines was paramount, using a limited number of outposts.[12] They operated on the principles of fewer arms, but more ammunition per weapon and the economical use thereof.[13]

In Operation Barbarossa in 1941, both Russian and German soldiers had to endure terrible conditions during the Russian winter. The German-Finnish joint offensive against Murmansk (Operation Silver Fox) in 1941 saw heavy fighting in the Arctic environment. Subsequently, the Petsamo-Kirkenes Operation conducted by the Soviet Army against the Wehrmacht in 1944 in northern Finland and Norway drove the Germans out of there.[14] In late 1944, Finland turned against their former cobelligerents, Nazi Germany, under the Soviet Union's pressure and pressured the Germans to withdraw in the ensuing Lapland War.[15] While use of ski infantry was common in the Soviet Army, Germany formed only one division for movement on skis.[11] From June 1942 to August 1943, the United States and Canada fought the Japanese in the Aleutian Islands Campaign in the Alaska Territory.[16]

In the Arctic

Rime ice on a 20-inch signal projector on the cruiser, HMS Sheffield (C24), escorting a 1941 Arctic convoy to the Soviet Union in World War II.

The following actions were fought in the Arctic by land and naval forces between 1941 and 1945 in the following theaters of operations:

Finland – The Winter War was a military conflict between the Soviet Union (USSR) and Finland. It began with a Soviet invasion of Finland on 30 November 1939, three months after the outbreak of World War II, and ended three and a half months later with the Moscow Peace Treaty on 13 March 1940.

In the Battle of Suomussalmi, Finns leveraged cold weather to disadvantage the Soviet enemy troops by targeting field kitchens and campfires for their attacks, thereby denying those troops warmth and nutrition.[17][18] The Finns rotated their troops so that they could regularly return to warm shelters to recuperate after an attack or patrol. Heavy Soviet equipment and their associated troops were restricted to roads, while Finnish ski troops had broad mobility to outflank the enemy.[18] The threat of Finnish snipers, whom the Russians called "cuckoos", further demoralized the Soviets.[17][18] The Finns mined ice routes over lakes to sink Soviet equipment.[19]

The Lapland War was fought between Finland and Germany from September 1944 to April 1945 in Finland's northernmost Lapland Province. It included:[20]

Norway – The liberation of Finnmark was a military operation, lasting from 23 October 1944 until 26 April 1945, in which Soviet and Norwegian forces wrestled away control of Finnmark, the northernmost county of Norway, from Germany. It started with a major Soviet offensive that liberated Kirkenes.[24]

Northern RussiaOperation Silver Fox was a joint GermanFinnish military operation offensive during World War II. Its main goal was to cut off and ultimately capture the key Soviet port at Murmansk through attacks from Finnish and Norwegian territory.[25]

SpitsbergenOperation Gauntlet was a Combined Operations raid by Canadian troops, with British Army logistics support and Free Norwegian Forces servicemen on the Norwegian island of Spitsbergen, 600 miles south of the North Pole, from 25 August to 3 September 1941.[26] Operation Fritham was a Norwegian military operation, based from British soil, that had the goal of securing the rich coal mines on the island of Spitsbergen (a part of Svalbard) and denying their use to Nazi Germany.[27] Operation Zitronella (Citronella) was an eight-hour German raid on Spitzbergen on 8 September 1943.[28] This marks the highest latitude at which a land battle has ever been fought. However, given the extreme conditions, the German and Allied troops were at times compelled to assist each other to survive.[29]

United States – The Aleutian Islands Campaign was a campaign conducted by both the United States and Imperial Japan from June 3, 1942 to August 15, 1943 in Attu and Kiska, part of the Aleutian Islands in Alaska during World War II.[30]

Post World War II

The Battle of Chosin Reservoir was a stark example of cold affecting military operations in the Korean War. There were many cold injuries and malfunctions of materiel, both vehicles and weapons.[31][32]

The Sino-Indian War was a Himalayan border conflict between China and India that occurred in 1962. India initiated a Forward Policy in which it placed outposts along the border in 1961. China launched simultaneous offensives in Ladakh and across the McMahon Line on 20 October 1962. Chinese troops advanced over Indian forces in both theaters. Much of the fighting took place in harsh mountain conditions, entailing large-scale combat at altitudes of over 4,000 metres (14,000 feet).[33] Many troops on both sides succumbed to the freezing cold temperatures.[34]

Argentine troops suffered from cold-wet conditions, holding positions in the 1982 Falklands War.[35]

The Siachen conflict is a military confrontation between India and Pakistan over the disputed Siachen Glacier region in Kashmir. The conflict began in 1984 with India's successful Operation Meghdoot during which it gained control over all of the Siachen Glacier.[36] A cease-fire went into effect in 2003.[37]

Historical lessons learned

Frostbitten hand with gangrene, suffered by a Japanese soldier in the Sino-Japanese War, winter of 1894-5

Paton offered a 2001 overview of human factors pertaining to cold in military operations. The understanding of cold injuries evolved in the 19th and 20th centuries; understanding of the causes and treatment of frostbite and trench foot improved. In the Sino-Japanese War, the Japanese learned the importance of foot care, keeping feet dry and warm with replacement socks. In WWI doctors realized that trench foot was a prolonged exposure to cold, wet conditions on the feet, which were exacerbated by the use of tight puttees, bandage-like leg wrappings.[38]

The Russian invasion of Finland during the Winter War showed the power of asymmetric warfare on the Finnish side, where small units were able to cut the road-bound Soviet invading troops into segments, like firewood, and vanquish each segment. The small units arrived silently on skis or with light artillery pulled by reindeer over frozen, untracked terrain, using winter conditions as an advantage. Although the Soviet Union gained territory from the Finns, it was at the cost of 200,000 fatalities against 25,000 on the Finnish side.[2]

The German invasion of Russia induced more than 250,000 cold injuries in one year. The French occupying the Maginot Line experienced 12,000 cold injuries. Experiences from the disastrous 1941 German advance on Moscow in winter conditions led to the 1942 Taschenbuch für den Winterkrieg ("Pocket book for Winter War"), which highlighted ideal approaches to handling winter, but acknowledged that improvisation in the field would be necessary when supplies were lacking. The Russian troops in this period had felt-lined boots and quilted uniforms, whereas the Germans continued fighting in their summer uniforms.[38]

German handbook

German troops extricating vehicle from the November 1941 mud in the Eastern Front.
Improvised shelter around a fir tree, adapted from the 1942 German Taschenbuch für den Winterkrieg

The Taschenbuch für den Winterkrieg manual contains discusses winter, mud, and thaw with sections on the influence and duration of winter, the seasons of mud and thaw, preparation for winter warfare, winter combat methods and maintaining morale, including the use of reading material, lectures, movies, and "strength through joy" exercises. Other sections cover marches, the maintenance of roads, winter bivouacs and shelter, construction of winter positions, camouflage and concealment, identification of the enemy, clothing, rations, evacuation of the wounded, care and use of weapons and equipment, signal communication, and winter mobility. The manual was designed to provide information at the officer level for indoctrination of troops via the non-commissioned officer ranks. The scope of the manual is to train troops in the following areas:[39]

  • Protection of personnel, vehicles and weapons against snow and cold
  • Training personnel to be hardened against the conditions encountered and able to improvise shelter from found materials
  • Mobility on skis, winter roads, ice crossings, and conversion of wheeled vehicles into tracked versions
  • Construction of positions and obstacles in frozen terrain
  • Combat in deep snow and severe cold

Some highlights include addressing:[39]

  • Human factors – Providing the right level of clothing to maintain agility and avoid overheating. Maintaining a slow, steady marching pace to avoid chilling down in the wind. Boosting morale with up-to-date newspapers from home and nearby areas. Providing improvised shelters and bivouacs. Hygiene, emphasizing cleanliness.
  • Mobility – Setting up and maintaining winter roads and trails. Warming up engines for reliable starting.
  • Positions and fortifications – Using logs and snow as materials to provide trenches and gun emplacements.
  • Care of equipment – Keeping equipment dry, when possible, and substituting low-temperature lubricants for oils and hydraulic fluids.

Russian experience

The Soviet Army learned both from its 1939-40 Winter War experiences and the 1941 German advance on Moscow. The high command realized that it must prepare entire divisions for winter warfare in 1942, beginning with warm uniforms, winter equipment (skis, etc.), and training for winter operations. Analysis of previous experiences resulted in a series of manuals that covered flight, engineer, and combat arms operations in winter. Issues covered included:[40]

  • Flight operations – Reduced daylight, snow drifting, cold temperatures impeded the added need for air transport.
  • Engineer operations – Engineer troops build new roadways, airfields, water crossings, and encampments with water supply. They destroy obstacles, requiring engineering equipment. Regular troops entrench tanks, construct tank obstacles, and build simple shelters.
  • Combat arms operations – Addressing the German methods of defense with automatic weapons strongholds, supplemented with mines, wires, and anti-tank obstacles. Against these, the Russians used coordinated massed fire.
Soviet gunner providing covering fire during the 1941 Battle of Moscow.

In his 1981 paper, Fighting the Russians in Winter: Three Case Studies, Chew draws on experiences from the Allied-Soviet War in Northern Russia during the Winter of 1918–19, the destruction of the Soviet 44th Motorized Rifle Division, and Nazi–Soviet Warfare during World War II to derive winter warfare factors pertaining to military tactics, materiel and personnel:[41]

  • Tactics – Defensive positions are highly advantageous because of the ability to maintain warmth and protection, compared to attacking in extreme cold. Mobility and logistical support are often restricted by snow, requiring plowing or compacting it to accommodate wide-tracked vehicles or sleds. Infantry movement in deep snow requires skis or snowshoes to avoid exhaustion. Sound carries well over crusted snow, diminishing the element of surprise. Explosives are useful for excavating foxholes and larger shelters in frozen ground. Attacking field kitchens and encampments deprives the enemy of food and shelter. Rapid removal of the wounded from the battlefield is essential to their survival in the cold.
  • Materiel – Weapons and vehicles require special lubricants to operate at low temperatures. Mines are unreliable in winter, owing to deep snow that may cushion the fuse or form an ice bridge over the detonator.
  • Personnel – Proper winter clothing is required to maintain body heat and to avoid such cold injuries as frostbite. Troop efficiency and survival requires either making use of available shelter or providing portable shelter.

Land operations

Operational factors encompass planning for the climate and weather in which military operations are required with snow, ice, mud and cold being the primary considerations. Military tactics, materiel, combat engineering and military medicine all require specialized adaptations to the conditions encountered in cold weather. The Soviet Army was an early adopter of a protocol for winter warfare.[40]

Cold and mountainous regions

Cold regions that have a significant effect on military operations for one month or more each year.
  Severely cold
  Moderately cold
The principal mountain ranges of the world.

In its 2016 "Mountain Warfare and Cold Weather Operations" manual, the US Army defines cold regions as "where cold temperatures, unique terrain, and snowfall have a significant effect on military operations for one month or more each year." It describes regions that are either severely cold or moderately cold, each comprising approximately one quarter of the Earth's land mass.[42]

  • Severely cold – Where mean annual air temperatures stay below freezing, maximum snow depths exceed 60 centimetres (24 in), and ice covers lakes and rivers for more than 180 days each year.
  • Moderately cold – Where the mean temperatures during the coldest month are below freezing.

The manual also delineates the principal mountain ranges of the world, which lie along broad belts which encircle the Pacific basin and then lead westward across Eurasia into North Africa. Secondarily, rugged chains of mountains lie along the Atlantic margins of the Americas and Europe.

Cooling power of wind, expressed as an equivalent chill temperature under calm conditions.

Weather conditions

Temperature, wind, snow, and thaw are the primary conditions that affect the winter battlescape.

Temperature

The US Army groups cold temperatures using categories. The temperature categories are (with quoted summaries):[42]

  • Wet cold – From 39 to 20 °F (4 to −7 °C). Wet cold conditions occur when wet snow and rain often accompany wet cold conditions. This type of environment is more dangerous to troops and equipment than the colder, dry cold environments because the ground becomes slushy and muddy and clothing and equipment becomes perpetually wet and damp.
  • Dry cold – From 19 to −4 °F (−7 to −20 °C). Dry cold conditions are easier to live in than wet cold conditions. Like in wet cold conditions, proper equipment, training and leadership are critical to successful operations. Wind chill is a complicating factor in this type of cold. The dry cold environment is the easiest of the four cold weather categories to survive in because of low humidity and the ground remains frozen. As a result, people and equipment are not subject to the effects of the thawing and freezing cycle, and precipitation is generally in the form of dry snow.
  • Intense cold – From −5 to −25 °F (−21 to −32 °C). This temperature range can affect the mind as much as the body. Simple tasks take longer and require more effort than in warmer temperatures and the quality of work degrades as attention-to-detail diminishes. Clothing becomes more bulky to compensate for the cold so troops lose dexterity. Commanders consider these factors when planning operations and assigning tasks.
  • Extreme cold – From −25 to −40 °F (−32 to −40 °C). In extreme cold the challenge of survival becomes paramount as personnel withdraw into themselves. Weapons, vehicles and munitions are likely to fail in this environment.
  • Hazardous cold – From −40 °F (−40 °C) and below. Units require extensive training before operating in these temperature extremes.

The combined cooling effect of ambient temperature and wind (wind chill) is an important factor that affects troops.

Snow

Airborne security detachment of US troops exiting CH-47 Chinook helicopter in Afghanistan.

For military purposes, the US Army categorizes snow as light, moderate, or heavy. Each classification affects visibility and ground movement due to accumulation and is quoted below:[42]

  • Light snow – Visibility is equal to or greater than 58 mile (1,000 m) in falling snow. A trace to one inch (2.5 cm) per hour accumulates.
  • Moderate snow – Visibility is 516 to 12 mile (500 to 800 m) in falling snow. One to three inches (2.5 to 7.6 cm) per hour accumulates.
  • Heavy snow – Visibility is less than 14 mile (400 m) in falling snow. Three inches (7.6 cm) or more inches per hour accumulates.

Snow and snowdrifts can create advantages on the battlefield by filling in ditches and vehicle tracks and flattening the terrain. It also creates hollows on the downwind side of obstacles, such as trees, buildings, and bushes, which provide observation points or firing positions. Snowdrifts may provide cover for soldiers to approach an objective.[42] Soviet Army doctrine cited 30 centimetres (12 in) as the threshold snow depth that impairs mobility for troops, cavalry and vehicles, except tanks for which the threshold was 50 centimetres (20 in).[40]

Thaw

Russian T-80 main battle tank maneuvering in thawing conditions.

Thawing conditions can impair mobility and put soldiers at risk of trench foot by turning soil to mud; it can also weaken and break up ice cover on bodies of water. Maintaining roads becomes more difficult during spring-thaw run-off periods and requires mud removal by heavy equipment. Slushy and muddy ground causes clothing and equipment to become wet, damp and dirty.[42] Muddy conditions greatly inhibited Napoleon's ability to maneuver in Russia in the autumn of 1812[43] and also the German attempt to take Moscow in the autumn of 1941.[44]

The 1942 Taschenbuch für den Winterkrieg acknowledges that neither tracked nor wheeled vehicles can maneuver during conditions of thaw and that aircraft operations must be constrained to concrete runways. It addresses minimizing the use of roads during this period and dismantling bridges that are likely to be taken out by ice floes. It emphasizes how positions in frozen soil must be improved to avoid deterioration from thaw and the necessity of changing uniforms from ones for cold to those for wet conditions.[39]

Tactics

A Norwegian Bandvagn 206 small unit support vehicle.

The dominant tactical concern in cold conditions is the ability to maneuver in vehicles or on foot. Additionally, during winter, night operations become the norm at higher latitudes with their long periods of darkness.[42] Snow enhances night vision because of high reflectivity and the visibility of combatants against the white background.[40]

Mounted movement

The German Taschenbuch für den Winterkrieg emphasizes reconnaissance to ascertain the conditions and capacity of the roads to be used. It describes snow clearing from roads and recovery of bogged-down vehicles.[39]

Soviet Army doctrine emphasized the use of sleds for transporting machine guns and mortars over snow, towed in a train by tracked tractors. It addressed the need to pre-heat tanks for use in winter and their application in advance of marching troops to take out enemy positions.[40]

Finnish military doctrine calls for small-unit movements with anti-tank guided missiles and multiple launch rocket systems to attack foreign forces that have entered the country.[2]

US Army guidance advocates that over snow-covered terrain, vehicles may be employed to establish and maintain trails by establishing a well concealed track with the first vehicle, followed by a vehicle traveling offset from the track of the first, to flatten the trail, and subsequent vehicles widening and flattening the trail. Marked trails avoid obliteration in snowstorms or drifting conditions. In mountainous terrain, tracked vehicles, including tanks, infantry fighting vehicles, and cavalry fighting vehicles, rarely accompany dismounted infantry in the assault. Instead, they assist forces by occupying positions where they can use their firepower to isolate enemy objectives.[42]

Dismounted movement

Rates of march for unit movement in snow.

The German Taschenbuch describes preparation and conduct of marches and advocates maintaining slow, steady progress with brief stops to avoid exposure to the wind, and the provision of warm beverages by support vehicles along the way.[39]

Soviet Army doctrine emphasized the use ski troops for dismounted operations over snow.[40]

US Army guidance explains that troops moving in a wedge-like "column" formation travel more slowly, with no one breaking the trail in undisturbed snow, than the in-line file formation. Therefore, column formation is reserved for imminent enemy contact. As slope angle increases, the amount of travel time is likely to increase substantially.[42]

Water crossings

Diagram for creating a tank trap on ice, adapted from the Taschenbuch für den Winterkrieg

The German Taschenbuch describes the assessment and reinforcement of ice crossings and also the opportunity to use them as tank traps by removing the ice and bridging the gap with a weak structure, disguised as reinforced ice. It offers the following guidance for crossing ice sheets: [39]

Ice thickness Type of military traffic Minimum interval
5 centimetres (2 in) Infantry in file with double intervals 7 metres (23 ft)
20 centimetres (8 in) Vehicles with gross weight of 4.5 tonnes (5 short tons) 20 metres (66 ft)
30 centimetres (12 in) Vehicles with gross weight of 8.2 tonnes (9 short tons) 30 metres (98 ft)
40 centimetres (16 in) 18-tonne (20-short-ton) vehicles, light tanks 40 metres (131 ft)
60 centimetres (24 in) 41-tonne (45-short-ton) vehicles 50 metres (164 ft)

Soviet Army doctrine described the assessment and reinforcement of ice crossings and suggested the use of frozen lakes and rivers as expeditionary airfields, located close to the front to take advantage of short daylight hours in winter.[40]

According to the US Army, rivers found in cold regions may be major obstacles. Subarctic rivers usually have many braided channels and swift currents. During spring and early winter, rivers may become impassable due to freezing or thawing ice flows. Once firmly frozen, rivers may offer routes for both mounted and dismounted movement. Some swampy areas do not freeze solidly during the coldest periods of winter to support troop movements. Nonetheless, it is possible to construct "ice bridges" to thicken an iced-over waterway, using pumps or some other means of flooding the ice-covered area, when temperatures are below −12 °C (10 °F) and the pre-existing natural ice is thicker than 10 centimeters (four inches) to support the construction activity.[42]

Snow camouflage

Austro-Hungarian ski patrol on Italian Front in snow camouflage, 1915-1918[45]

Armies have made use of improvised and official snow camouflage uniforms and equipment since the First World War, such as in the fighting in the Dolomite Mountains between Austria-Hungary and Italy.[46][47] Snow camouflage was used far more widely in the Second World War by the Wehrmacht, the Finnish Army, the Soviet Army and others.[48][49][50][51] Since then, snow variants of disruptively patterned camouflage for uniforms have been introduced, sometimes with digital patterns. For example, the Bundeswehr has a Schneetarn (snow) variant of its widely used Flecktarn pattern.[52]

Soviet Army doctrine emphasized the importance of camouflage over positions and the need to remove telltale signs of artillery actions, such as smoke stains or shell casings. It also cited the usefulness of decoy targets. It describes the establishment of breastworks made from snow 2 to 3 metres (7 to 10 ft) thick, ice 1.5 metres (5 ft) thick or soil and wood 0.9 metres (3 ft) thick.[40]

Materiel

US Army transport vehicles during the Battle of the Bulge.

Snow, ice and cold temperatures affect munitions and military vehicles.

Munitions – Snow, ice, frozen ground, and low temperatures affect mine-laying operations. Burying mines in a frost layer may be difficult, requiring mines to be placed on top of the ground and then camouflaged. Snow or ice may prevent detonation, owing to freezing the firing device or isolating from pressure above. This can be mitigated with plastic laid over the top of the mine.[42]

Vehicles – Adaptations of military vehicles to winter operations include tire chains for maintaining traction of wheeled vehicles. Diesel engines start less well in cold and may require pre-heating or idling during cold periods.[42] A variety of military vehicles have been developed for over-snow travel, including the Sisu Nasu,[53] BvS 10,[54] and M29 Weasel.[55]

Military engineering

Cross section of a snow-covered trench for troop emplacement, adapted from the 1942 German Taschenbuch für den Winterkrieg

Military engineers design and construct transportation and troop-support facilities. In cold climates frozen ground can make digging difficult.[42] Soviet Army doctrine gave them the responsibility to establish build and maintain routes, including water crossings, build and destroy obstacles that require special equipment, construct and maintain airfields, and to build shelter for personnel. Operations that didn't require special equipment were left to other troops.[40] The Taschenbuch describes a variety of ways to employ local resources to create roads, shelters and fortifications.[39]

Engineers provide roadways, landing zones, shelter, water supply and wastewater disposal, and electrical power to encampments. Roadway and landing zones require heavy equipment, which is more fatiguing to operate in the cold and necessary to protect from freezing. Snowstorms require cleanup and spring thaw requires management of thawed soil. Landing zones require stabilization of dust and snow to avoid blinding helicopter pilots. The US Army has cold-weather adaptive kits for providing water and electrical utilities. The tactical engineer has limited options for providing a water supply; they are in order of ease of provision: drawing water from rivers or lakes, melting ice or snow, or drilling wells.[42]

Water supply and treatment is especially challenging in the cold. US Army tactical water purification systems require a winter kit operate between 32 and −25 °F (0 and −32 °C). Water storage may require heating. Water source exploitation may require angering through ice, if shaped charges are not available. The water distribution system can be subject to freezing and clogging from frazil ice. Where chemical treatment is used, it takes longer to dissolve in the treated water.[42]

Medicine

Military poster on preventing trench foot.

Three types of cold injury can occur in the theater, hypothermia, trench foot, and frostbite in ascending amount of exposure to cold temperatures.

Hypothermia

Hypothermia occurs when the body core temperature drops below 35 °C (95 °F). Symptoms depend on the temperature and range from shivering and mental confusion to increased risk of the heart stopping. The treatment of mild hypothermia involves warm drinks, warm clothing and physical activity. In those with moderate hypothermia heating blankets and warmed intravenous fluids are recommended. People with moderate or severe hypothermia should be moved gently. In severe hypothermia extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) or cardiopulmonary bypass may be useful. In those without a pulse cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is indicated along with the above measures. Rewarming is typically continued until a person's temperature is greater than 32 °C (90 °F). Adequate insulation from clothing is the best way to avoid hypothermia in the field.[56]

Trench foot

Trench foot is a medical condition caused by prolonged exposure of the feet to damp, unsanitary, and cold conditions at temperatures as warm as 16 °C (61 °F) for as few as 13 hours. Exposure to these environmental conditions causes deterioration and destruction of the capillaries and leads to morbidity of the surrounding flesh.[57] Affected feet may become numb, affected by erythema (turning red) or cyanosis (turning blue) as a result of poor blood supply, and may begin emanating a decaying odour if the early stages of necrosis (tissue death) set in. As the condition worsens, feet may also begin to swell. Advanced trench foot often involves blisters and open sores, which lead to fungal infections. If left untreated, trench foot usually results in gangrene, which may require amputation. If trench foot is treated properly, complete recovery is normal, though it is marked by severe short-term pain when feeling returns. Trench foot affected tens of thousands of soldiers engaged in trench warfare in World War I. Keeping feet warm and dry, or at least changing into warm and dry replacement footgear, is the best way to avoid trench foot.[58]

Frostbite

Frostbite is localized damage to skin and other tissues due to freezing. At or below 0 °C (32 °F), blood vessels close to the skin start to constrict, and blood is shunted away from the extremities. The same response may also be a result of exposure to high winds. This constriction helps to preserve core body temperature. In extreme cold, or when the body is exposed to cold for long periods, this protective strategy can reduce blood flow in some areas of the body to dangerously low levels. This lack of blood leads to the eventual freezing and death of skin tissue in the affected areas. Frostbite was responsible for over one million casualties in wars in the 20th century. Adequate insulation from clothing is the best way to avoid hypothermia in the field.[58]

Training by nation

Unit of the Japan Ground Self-Defense Force training with an 81 mm mortar.
Russian cadets training for Arctic conditions.
US Navy SEALs demonstrate small-unit tactics for winter operations.

The following nations report regular training programs in cold-weather warfare:

  • Canada – In 2008, the Canadian Forces established the Nanisivik Naval Facility, a winter warfare training center above the arctic circle in Resolute, Nunavut[59] for annual exercises.[60]
  • China – The People's Liberation Army trains annually in regions subject to harsh winter conditions. Lightly armed border patrol units are mounted on horseback or snowmobiles and are expected to provide early detection of incursion.[61]
  • Finland – The Finnish Defence Forces train every conscript for skiing and Arctic warfare regardless of the branch, approximately 25,000 soldiers per year.[62] Finland also trains US Army students in Arctic warfare.[63]
Cold-weather training exercises
American sailors clearing ice from ship topsides
Los Angeles-class fast attack submarine USS Alexandria (SSN 757) surfacing through two feet (0.6 m) of Arctic ice.
Russian Akula-class submarine of the Northern Fleet submarine base at Gadzhiyevo in the Murmansk Oblast.

Subfreezing conditions have significant implications for naval operations. The 1988 US Navy Cold Weather Handbook for Surface Ships outlines effects on: icing on the topsides of ships, ship systems, underway replenishment, flight operations, and personnel. It also discusses preparations for cold-weather fleet operations.[75]

Topside icing on ships

Topside icing is a serious hazard to ships operating in sub-freezing temperatures. Thick layers of ice can form on decks, sides, superstructures, deck mounted machinery, antennas and combat systems. The presence of topside ice has many adverse effects, principally it:[75]

  • Increases ship displacement
  • Decreases freeboard
  • Impairs operation of deck machinery
  • Impedes personnel movement on deck
  • Restricts helicopter operations
  • Disrupts operation of radio and radars

Combat systems degradation

Icing may prevent a warship from conducting any type of offensive operations, including restraining the doors of a vertical launch systems, binding gears, shafts, hinges and pedestals. Other effects include sluggish performance of lubricants, increased failure rate of seals, plugs and O-rings, frozen magazine sprinkler systems, excessively long warm-up times for electronics or weapon system electronics, and freeze up of compressed-air-operated components.[75]

Arctic operations

Global climate change has opened the waters of the Arctic along the northern shores of Alaska, Russia and Canada. The region is rich in natural resources. Countries abutting the Arctic Ocean have shown greater military patrol activity. The Military Times reported in 2015 that Russia had reactivated ten military bases, had increased surface ship and aircraft patrols of its Northern Fleet, and had conducted missile tests in the region. The US Navy plans to have sufficient assets by 2030 to respond militarily in the Arctic. As of 2015, it conducted regular submarine patrols, but few air or surface ship operations. Russia had twelve ice breakers versus two for the US.[76] As of 2013, Canada had six ice breakers.[77] In 2016, Canada announced the building of five ice-breaking Arctic and offshore patrol ships.[78]

See also

References

  1. White Death | The National WWII Museum. Retrieved 13 August 2019.
  2. Rehman, Iskander (2016-07-20). "Lessons from the Winter War: Frozen Grit and Finland's Fabian Defense". War on the Rocks. Retrieved 2020-05-02.
  3. Nicolle, David (1996). Lake Peipus 1242: Battle of the Ice. Osprey Publishing. p. 41. ISBN 9781855325531.
  4. Turnbull, Stephen (2003). Kawanakajima 155364 : Samurai Power Struggle. Reynolds, Wayne. Oxford: Osprey Pub. pp. 14. ISBN 978-1-84603-652-1. OCLC 476231761.
  5. Lindqvist, Herman (1992). Historien om Sverige (in Danish). Stockholm: Norstedt. ISBN 978-91-1-932112-1. OCLC 28079124.
  6. Oakley, Stewart P. (2005). War and Peace in the Baltic, 1560-1790. Routledge.
  7. Mattila, Tapani (1983). Meri maamme turvana [Sea safeguarding our country] (in Finnish). Jyväskylä: K. J. Gummerus Osakeyhtiö. ISBN 951-99487-0-8.
  8. Professor Saul David (9 February 2012). "Napoleon's failure: For the want of a winter horseshoe". BBC news magazine. Retrieved 9 February 2012.
  9. The Wordsworth pocket encyclopedia. Wordsworth Editions. 1994. p. 17. ISBN 978-1-85326-301-9. OCLC 59840596.
  10. Evans, David C. (15 January 2015). Kaigun : strategy, tactics, and technology in the Imperial Japanese Navy, 1887-1941. Peattie, Mark R., 1930- (First Naval Institute Press paperback ed.). Annapolis, Md. p. 46. ISBN 978-1-61251-425-3. OCLC 897464699.
  11. Clemmesen, Michael H.; Faulkner, Marcus, eds. (2013). Northern European Overture to War, 1939–1941: From Memel to Barbarossa. Brill. p. 76. ISBN 978-90-04-24908-0.
  12. Staff (July 1943). "Combat in High Mountains, Snow, and Extreme Cold". Intelligence Journal. 2 (7). Retrieved 2020-05-07.
  13. Staff (March 1944). "Some Notes on German Mountain Warfare". Intelligence Journal. 2 (7). Retrieved 2020-05-07.
  14. Gebhardt, James F. (September 1989). "The Petsamo-Kirkenes Operation: Soviet Breakthrough and Pursuit in the Arctic, October 1944" (PDF). Leavenworth Papers. 17: 4 via Army Press.
  15. Ahto, Sampo (1980). Aseveljet vastakkain – Lapin sota 1944–1945 [Brothers in Arms Opposing Each Other – Lapland War 1944–1945] (in Finnish). Helsinki: Kirjayhtymä. ISBN 978-951-26-1726-5.
  16. Hays, Otis (2004). Alaska's Hidden Wars: Secret Campaigns on the North Pacific Rim. University of Alaska Press. ISBN 1-889963-64-X.
  17. Rovsing, Jesper; Weper, Torsten (March 22, 2010). "Talvisota: Puolustussota 40 pakkasasteessa". historianet.fi (in Finnish). Retrieved 2020-01-04.
  18. Chew, Allen F. (1971). The White Death: The Epic of the Soviet-Finnish Winter War. Headquarters, U.S. Marine Corps.
  19. Trotter, William R., 1943- (1991). A frozen hell : the Russo-Finnish winter war of 1939-1940. Chapel Hill, N.C.: Algonquin Books of Chapel Hill. ISBN 978-1-56512-692-3. OCLC 847527726.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  20. Nenye, Vesa; Munter, Peter; Wirtanen, Toni; Birks, Chris (2016). Finland at War: the Continuation and Lapland Wars 1941–45. Osprey Publishing. ISBN 978-1472815262.
  21. Lunde, Henrik O. (2011). Finland's War of Choice: The Troubled German-Finnish Alliance in World War II. Newbury: Casemate Publishers. ISBN 978-1-61200-037-4.
  22. Carruthers, Bob (2012). Hitler's Forgotten Armies: Combat in Norway and Finland. Warwickshire: Coda Books Ltd. ISBN 9781781580981.
  23. James F. Gebhardt. The Petsamo-Kirkenes Operation: Soviet Breakthrough and Pursuit in the Arctic, October 1944. pp. 75–83.
  24. "Finnmark Celebrates Liberation from Nazi Occupation with the Help of Russians". The Nordic Page. 20 October 2014. Retrieved 5 April 2019.
  25. Mann, Chris M.; Jörgensen, Christer (2002). Hitler's Arctic War. Hersham, UK: Ian Allan. ISBN 0-7110-2899-0.
  26. Schuster, Carl O. "Weather War". U.S. Army Aberdeen Test Center. Archived from the original on October 20, 2008. Retrieved 2008-09-18.
  27. "Andre Verdenskrig på Svalbard". svalbardmuseum.no (in Norwegian). Svalbard Museum. 24 July 2011. Archived from the original on 24 July 2011. Retrieved 5 April 2019.
  28. Torkildsen, Torbjørn (1998). Svalbard : vårt nordligste Norge [Svalbard: Our Northernmost Norway] (in Norwegian) (3rd ed.). Oslo: Aschehoug, in cooperation with Det norske svalbardselskap. ISBN 82-03-22224-2. Retrieved 15 October 2016.
  29. Keegan, John (1993). A History of Warfare. Alfred A. Knopf, Inc. pp. 69. ISBN 0-394-58801-0.
  30. Editors (May 10, 2019). "Battle of the Aleutian Islands". History Channel. Retrieved 2020-05-02.CS1 maint: extra text: authors list (link)
  31. Duncan, James Carl (June 2013). Adventures of a Tennessean. AuthorHouse. p. 145. ISBN 978-1-4817-4157-6.
  32. Tilstra, Russell C. (13 March 2014). The Battle Rifle: Development and Use Since World War II. McFarland. p. 28. ISBN 978-1-4766-1564-6.
  33. Calvin, James Barnard (April 1984). "The China-India Border War". Marine Corps Command and Staff College. Archived from the original on 11 November 2011. Retrieved 15 October 2011.
  34. Subramanian, L. N. (November–December 2000), "The Battle of Chushul", Bharat Rakshak Monitor, archived from the original on 9 February 2001
  35. Goodsell, James Nelson (1982-06-25). "Argentine troops tell why war lost". Christian Science Monitor. ISSN 0882-7729. Retrieved 2020-05-02.
  36. Wirsing, Robert (13 December 1991). Pakistan's security under Zia, 1977–1988: the policy imperatives of a peripheral Asian state. Palgrave Macmillan, 1991. ISBN 9780312060671.
  37. Pervez Musharraf (2006). In the Line of Fire: A Memoir. Free Press. ISBN 0-7432-8344-9.(pp. 68–69)
  38. Paton, Bruce C. (2001). "10". Cold, Casualties and Conquests: The Effects of Cold on Warfare. Textbooks of Military Medicine: Medical Aspects of Harsh Environments. 1. Washington: TMM Publications. pp. 313–49.
  39. Handbook on Winter Warfare (PDF). Washington, DC: Military Intelligence Division, U.S. War Department. 1943.
  40. Armstrong, Richard N.; Joseph G., Welsh (2014), Winter Warfare: Red Army Orders and Experiences, Case series on Soviet military theory and practice, Routledge, p. 208, ISBN 9781135211547, retrieved 2016-12-12
  41. Chew, Allen F. (December 1981). "Fighting the Russians in Winter: Three Case Studies" (PDF). Leavenworth Papers. Fort Leavenworth, Kansas: Combat Studies Institute, U.S. Army Command and General Staff College (5). ISSN 0195-3451. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2017-02-14. Retrieved 2016-12-10.
  42. Headquarters (April 2016). "Mountain Warfare and Cold Weather Operations" (PDF). US Army. Retrieved 2016-12-11.
  43. M. Adolphe Thiers (1864). History of the Consulate and the Empire of France under Napoleon. IV. Translated by D. Forbes Campbell; H. W. Herbert. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott & Co. p. 243. whilst it was almost impossible to drag the gun-carriages through the half-frozen mud (regarding November 20, 1812)
  44. Overy, Richard (1997). "Leningrad and Moscow". Russia's War. Penguin UK (published 1999). ISBN 9780141925127. Retrieved 21 August 2019.
  45. "The Austro-Hungarian Army on the Italian Front, 1915–1918". Imperial War Museum. Retrieved 13 April 2017.
  46. Bull, Stephen (2004). Encyclopedia of Military Technology and Innovation. Greenwood. p. 53. ISBN 978-1-57356-557-8.
  47. Englund, Peter (2011). The Beauty And The Sorrow: An intimate history of the First World War. Profile Books. p. 211. ISBN 978-1-84765-430-4.
  48. Brayley, Martin J. (2009). Camouflage uniforms : international combat dress 1940–2010. Ramsbury: Crowood. pp. 37 and passim. ISBN 978-1-84797-137-1.
  49. Peterson, D. (2001). Waffen-SS Camouflage Uniforms and Post-war Derivatives. Crowood. p. 64. ISBN 978-1-86126-474-9.
  50. Rottman, Gordon L. (2013). World War II Tactical Camouflage Techniques. Bloomsbury. pp. 31–33. ISBN 978-1-78096-275-7.
  51. Carruthers, Bob (2013) [28 January 1943]. Wehrmacht Combat Reports: The Russian Front. Pen and Sword. pp. 62–64. ISBN 978-1-4738-4534-3.
  52. Zäch, Sebastian. "Schneetarn". Bundeswehr (German Army). Retrieved 28 February 2017.
  53. Hofmann, George F. (1997), PB (United States. Army), United States Armor Association, p. 49
  54. Editors (29 April 2016). "Versatile Vikings' £37 million upgrade completed". Gov.UK. Ministry of Defence and Defence Equipment and Support. Retrieved 2016-12-11.CS1 maint: extra text: authors list (link)
  55. "OSS Briefing Film – The Weasel". Real Military Flix. Archived from the original on February 9, 2009. Retrieved 2009-02-09.
  56. Brown, Douglas J.A.; Brugger, Hermann; Boyd, Jeff; Paal, Peter (15 November 2012). "Accidental Hypothermia". New England Journal of Medicine. Massachusetts Medical Society. 367 (20): 1930–1938. doi:10.1056/nejmra1114208. ISSN 0028-4793. PMID 23150960.
  57. Coughlin, Michael J.; Saltzman, Charles L.; Mann, Roger A. (2013), Mann's Surgery of the Foot and Ankle (9 ed.), Elsevier Health Science, p. 2336, ISBN 9781455748617, retrieved 2016-12-11
  58. Schwartz, Richard B. (2008). Tactical Emergency Medicine. LWW medical book collection. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. p. 319. ISBN 9780781773324. Retrieved 2016-12-11.
  59. Staff (June 23, 2008). "Military's Arctic training facility opens in Resolute". CBC News. Retrieved 2016-12-11.
  60. The Canadian Press (June 23, 2008). "Winter warfare course shows military still struggling in Arctic". CBC News. Retrieved 2016-12-11.
  61. Blasko, Dennis J. (2013). The Chinese Army Today: Tradition and Transformation for the 21st Century. Asian Security Studies. Routledge. p. 312. ISBN 9781136519970. Retrieved 2016-12-12.
  62. Editors (2015). Liikuntakoulutuksen käsikirja (in Finnish). Finnish Defence Forces. p. 288. ISBN 978-951-25-2708-3. Retrieved 2017-10-31.CS1 maint: extra text: authors list (link)
  63. Staff (January 15, 2016). "US soldiers practice Arctic warfare in Lapland". Finnish Broadcasting Company. Retrieved 2017-10-31.
  64. Editors (April 4, 2020). "Sperre der Reiter Alpe verschoben". PNP.de (in German). Retrieved 2020-05-04.CS1 maint: extra text: authors list (link)
  65. Editors (2001). India: Foreign Policy & Government Guide. Volume 1346 of World Foreign Policy and Government Library. 1. International Business Publications. p. 400. ISBN 9780739782989. Retrieved 2016-12-12.CS1 maint: extra text: authors list (link)
  66. Editors (April 30, 2016). "Which forces IRGC deployed in Syria?". Islamic World Update. Retrieved 2016-12-14. The winter training camp is in Emamzadeh Hashem, in which there is a ski resort dedicated to the brigade, used for training snow warfare.CS1 maint: extra text: authors list (link)
  67. Tani, Saburō (1988). Rangers - The Strongest Combatants of the Ground Self Defense Force (in Japanese). Fusosha Publishing. pp. 154–186. ISBN 978-4594002350.
  68. "Cold Response 2016". forsvaret.no. Norwegian Armed Forces. 2016. Retrieved 2016-12-11. Cold Response is the Norwegian Armed Forces' main winter exercise. It is held every other year, and our partners are invited to participate.
  69. Wilk, Andrzej (June 26, 2013), "Russian army justifies its reforms" (PDF), OSW Commentary, Warsaw: Centre for Eastern Studies, 109, retrieved 2016-12-11
  70. "Дальневосточное высшее общевойсковое командное училище имени Маршала Советского Союза К.К.Рокоссовского" [Far Eastern Higher Combined Arms Command School named after Marshal of the Soviet Union KK Rokossovsky] (in Russian). Ministry of Defence. Retrieved 27 January 2020.
  71. "Единственный на Дальнем Востоке ледовый полигон построен для обучения будущих командиров арктических подразделений" [The only ice range in the Far East built to train future commanders of the Arctic units] (in Russian). Ministry of Defence. 22 December 2015. Retrieved 27 January 2020. командиры мотострелковых взводов (арктических)
  72. "Cold Weather Training". Royal Navy. Retrieved 2016-12-11.
  73. Scheppler, Bill (2002-12-15). British Royal Marines: Amphibious Division of the United Kingdom's Royal Navy. The Rosen Publishing Group, Inc. pp. 29–31. ISBN 9780823938063.
  74. Rojas, Yash (December 1, 2011). "'Cool School' teaches arctic survival". U.S. Air Force News. Retrieved 2018-03-29.
  75. Barr, Robert K. (May 1988), US Navy Cold Weather Handbook for Surface Ships (PDF), Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, retrieved 2016-12-13
  76. Bacon, Lance M. (February 11, 2015). "Navy prepares for Arctic operations as ice thins". militarytimes.com. Military times. Retrieved 2016-12-13.
  77. Editors (July 24, 2013). "U.S. Coast Guard's 2013 Review of Major Icebreakers of the World". USNI.org. US Naval Institute. Retrieved 2017-03-22.CS1 maint: extra text: authors list (link)
  78. "Arctic/Offshore Patrol Ships". Royal Canadian Navy. Retrieved 31 October 2016.

Further reading

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.