Luftnachrichten Abteilung 350

The Luftnachrichten Abteilung 350, abbreviated as OKL/LN Abt 350 and formerly called the (German: Oberkommando der Luftwaffe Luftnachrichten Abteilung 350), was the Signal Intelligence Agency of the German Air Force, the Luftwaffe, before and during World War II.[1] Before November 1944, the unit was named as the Chi-Stelle O. b. D.L (German: Chiffrierstelle, Oberbefehlshaber der Luftwaffe, lit. 'code centre, High Commander of the Air Force'), which was often abbreviated to Chi-Stelle/Obdl or more commonly Chi-Stelle. The founding of the former agencies of OKL/LN Abt 350 dates back to the year 1936, when Colonel (later General) (German: Generalnachrichten-Führer der Luftwaffe) Wolfgang Martini instigated the creation of the agency, that was later established on the orders of Hermann Göring, the German politician, military leader, and leading member of the Nazi Party.[2] Right from the beginning, the Luftwaffe High Command resolved itself to make itself entirely independent from the German Army in the field of cryptology.[3][4]

Background

The LN Abt 350 was one of a large number of regiments which were named in that series, but there were several related regiments, which dealt with intelligence-related matters, of one kind or another. These were as follows:

  • LN Regiment 351. Commanded by Major Ristow. Its task was the mapping and interception of communications intelligence of Allied air forces in England and France. It conducted air to air interception, ground to air, and ground to ground including tracking of navigational aids. It had three departments I, I and II.[4]
  • LN Regiment 352. Commanded by Major Ferdinand Feichtner. Its task was mapping and interception of communication intelligence of Allied air forces in the Mediterranean area.[4]
  • LN Regiment 353. Commanded by Colonel Hans Eick. Its task was the Soviet Air Force.[4]
  • LN Abteilung 355. Commanded by Major Camerlander. Its task was Allied air forces in northern areas, specifically the Soviet Air Force in Northern Norway. It covered ground to ground, and air to air according to reception conditions.[4] This unit was formerly W-Leit 5 based in Oslo.
  • LN Abteilung 356. Commanded by Captain Trattner. Its task was route tracking of Allied air forces by radar interception and in collaboration with LN Regiment 357.[4]
  • LN Abteilung 357. Commanded by Captain Rueckheim. Its task was Allied four-engined formations and route tracking by intercepted signals and in collaboration with LN Abt. 356.[4]
  • LN Abteilung 358. This was for training of intercept personnel.[4]
  • LN Abteilung 359. Commanded by Captain de Wilde. Its task was the radio jamming of Allied communications, but it also conducted deception operations.[4]

Origin

Organization chart with legend for Luftwaffe Signals Organization.

As early as 1935, civilian employees of the Luftwaffe had been sent to fixed intercept stations of the German Army for training. A Luftwaffe officer, a technician and a civilian inspector who has been associated with the German Army Intelligence Service during World War I were transferred to the Luftwaffe Chi-Stelle. The two people canvassed for assistants among their old circle of acquaintances, former soldiers who had served in World War I as intercept technicians or cryptanalysts. Their numbers were no means sufficient for the task at hand.[2] They consisted of people who at one time, either in civilian or military life, had received radio training or who were fluent in foreign languages. Among them were old soldiers, former seamen, professional travellers, adventurers and political refugees. In contrast to the Army, security measures taken in admitting people to the Agency were superficial, and a great number were found to be of questionable character. These trainees made training more difficult. Owing to their privileged position, they had a derogatory influence on the Luftwaffe Agency.[5]

In creating the Chi-Stelle, the fundamental error was committed of choosing personnel indiscriminately, without any regard to their previous training for this special work. The civilian employees had training, but no training in Chi-Stelle type of work. The first technical equipment was very deficient. Old receivers from World War I were being used, and the installation alone was a technically difficult task, and therefore naturally unsuitable for the SIS. Even the later-installed multiple dial receivers were in part improvised.[6] Therefore, the importance of the Chi-Stelle in these first years remained slight, when it should have been assuming operation direction of the Luftwaffe Signal Intelligence Operation.[7] A small nucleus had been assembled, with independent Luftwaffe intercept experiments begun, and by the summer of 1936, traffic from Italy, Britain, Poland, Czechoslovakia and Russian air forces had been intercepted. The training of radio operations was supervised by a small cadre obtained from the Reichswehr cipher bureau. On 1 January, 1937, the agency was officially launched, under the Luftwaffe banner, with one officer and twenty civilians. It was called Chiffrier Stelle.[1] New Luftwaffe fixed intercept stations were founded in Munich, Münster, and Potsdam (Eiche) in 1937 and given the cover name of Weather Radio Receiving Stations (German: Wetterfunkempfangsstellen) (abbr. W-Stellen).[8] The Luftwaffe fixed intercept stations at first monitored only the air force point-to-point networks taken over by the Army. Since in peacetime, almost all countries sent their radio traffic in plaintext, the work was simple, and direction finding was unknown.[9] Personnel consisted at first of an officer in charge, two or three technicians and 30-40 civilian employees. Early training flights with the Zeppelin were carried out under the direction of the Chi-Stelle.[9]

Mobile intercept platoons were established at the same time, to operate in the field.[10][11] These small sections, about 10 analysts who undertook evaluation locally, corresponding to the monitoring areas of the three out-stations, were formed. The first dealt with England, France, and Belgium; the second with Italy, and the third with Russia, Poland and Czechoslovakia. To these were added a small cryptanalysis group, that was called the Chi-Stelle which served all three sections.[12] The intercept stations were supplemented by direction finding stations which were called Weather Research Stations (German: Wetterforschungsstellen) (abbr. Wo-Stellen), after the start of World War II. The small sections were expanded into mobile Radio Intercept Companies (German: Lufnachrichten Funkhorchkompanien Mot) which collaborated with the fixed stations in the intercept of foreign air force traffic.[13][11]

Relation to Luftwaffe Headquarters

The material sent from the out-stations to the Chi-Stelle Agency was classified according to tactical subject, and passed to the General Staff. Since, at this time, the Chi-Stelle itself was part of the General Staff, and as such was responsible for SIS planning and personnel policy, its importance in this early stage was considerable.[14] The intelligence passed to the General Staff was shared with the Chief of the Air Force, the Army, the Navy, and also the local air force: Luftlotte commanders. The Agency had the further duty of assigning intercept missions to the field units.[15][16] It soon became evident that the intelligence needs of the local air force (Luftflotte) commanders could be more quickly satisfied by having evaluation performed at a lower level than at the Agency. As a result, field evaluation centres of company strength were established and given the cover name of Weather Control Stations (German: Wetterleitstellen) (abbr. W-Leit).[17]

Plan for wartime organization

In 1939, after several experiments at reorganization, the fixed and mobile signal intelligence units were combined into Sig Int battalions, removed from the administrative control of Chi-Stelle, and attached to Local Air Force Signal Regiments, in each case as the third battalion of what was primarily a communication regiment. Each signal intelligence battalion was composed of an evaluation unit (the W-Leitstelle), two mobile intercept companies and three fixed intercept stations.[18][19] This decentralization of LNA 350 resulted the Chi-Stelle losing influence, especially at the outset of the war.[20]

In this organization, however, a serious mistake was made in that the above-mentioned companies were not activated immediately and taken under continuous training, as in the Army. Instead, they existed in the form of intercept platoons, which were trained by fixed intercept stations, the men being returned, after only a short period of training, to their radio companies in the Luftwaffe Signal Regiments. In this manner, a trained nucleus of personnel would have been built up before the war, as well as more than a few hundred civilian employees, which could be called upon at the start of the war. The functioning of the LNA 350 in the early months of the war was entirely to the credit of civilian employees, since it was they who had a knowledge of the activities.[21]

Start of War

Growth chart of the Luftwaffe Signals Organisation from 1937 to 1945 on a per sector basis

With the start of the war, the Chi-Stelle was already an organization of some 1400 people. For a whole year prior to the war, the fixed Chi-Stelle stations had been systematically covering the air force traffic of foreign countries. Their work was complemented by revealing press reports and other sources of intelligence, the results being that the High Command, prior to the outbreak of war in September 1939, could be stated as having a quite accurate picture of the air armament, deployment, and strength of foreign air forces, as well as their organization and expansion.[22] This intelligence enabled the German Command to quickly defeat the Polish and French Air Forces during the first phase of the war. It also permitted the Chi-Stelle closely to follow the activity of the Royal Air Force (RAF), even after the commencement of hostilities, when the use of efficient cipher systems was immediately adopted.[22]

When war began, each of the Referats (departments) dealing with foreign countries had compiled an opulent background of material on the foreign air force with which it was concerned. The quantity of this material constantly increased, and was studied carefully. Each Referat maintained close contact with its corresponding sub-section in the office of Ic (Operations), with these, in turn, lent the Chi-Stelle the benefit of their records and experience. The Referat exercised influence over the operations of the Intercept stations. On the other hand, preserving elasticity and processes in the conduct of operations was rendered more difficult by the profusion of Chi-Stelle and Intercept units activated at the start of World War II.[22]

Chi-Stelle

Organisation

In the beginning of 1938, a reorganisation of the Chi-Stelle took place. Referats (departments) were created to correspond to the subsections within the office of the Luftwaffe High Command. Thus they were newly formed or reorganised.[23]

  • Referat A: Personnel, radio equipment of other countries, procurement of radio equipment, and liaison with the Luftwaffe Procurement Division.
  • Referat B: Great Britain
  • Referat C: France and Italy
  • Referat D: Soviet Union, Poland, Czechoslovakia and the Balkans
  • Referat E: Cryptanalysis
  • Referat F: Direction finding (D/F) Evaluation. Referat F disappeared from the organisation in 1940, as common D/F evaluation of two countries in such widely different stages of radio development as Great Britain and the Soviet Union proved to be absurd.

With the exception of a few insignificant changes dictated by the military situation, this organisation remained effective until the end of World War II. Progressive planning and innovation took place within the other Referats. After the outbreak of the war, the Referats were brought up to company strength fairly quickly, while the Chi-Stelle itself was elevated to the status of a battalion within the signals regiment serving Luftwaffe HQ.[24]

1940-1941

Referat A

Immediately following the start of the Polish campaign, the Chi-Stelle moved from Berlin to the Marstall (Munich Residenz), the former riding academy of Frederick the Great. The Marstall became a sort of second name for the unit, since it remained there until just before the German collapse. In other respects the first six months of the war brought little change to its ministerial methods of working, or its relatively extravagant manner of existence. Only by the middle of 1940 did the newly inducted military personnel gain ascendancy over the civil service employees in the Marstall.[25] The development of the signals battalions assigned to the Luftflotte had been exploited primarily from the military point of view. Since even the signals companies assigned to the individual Fliegerkorps worked independently of the (German: W-Lietstellen), molding their individual activities to conform to the requirements of the combat units they served, the decentralisation of Chi-Stelle at first seemed to be very far reaching.[26]

Thus in the opening phase of the war, the importance of the unit was sharply reduced. The tremendous expansion within Chi had resulted in the employment of untrained personnel, made up in part, of radio operations from the Luftwaffe Signals Corps and in part linguists from other Luftwaffe units who had been transferred into Chi. The intercept stations were placed on their own, and had to be prepared to meet the demands made of them. In addition, teething problems presented themselves during the first months of the war, with types of problems that were never conceived during peace-time.[26] For these reasons, the focal point of the Chi-Stelle quite definitely shifted to the W-Leirstellen, and to those intercept stations which were especially favorably situated and capably commanded, considering that Chi-Stelle itself was scarcely more than an administrative office.

To meet this development, the unit expanded its Referats to an extent such that by the end of 1940, the referat were almost as large as the Leitstellen. Owning solely to its relations with General Staff, it took operational control of the Leitstellen, and requests for personnel or equipment by the Leitstellen had to be approved by the Chi-Stelle. In this manner, it remained the central organisation and administrative unit of the Luftwaffe Signals Intelligence organisation. Through this mechanism it remained in constant touch with all Chi-Stelle problems and this was especially true during the first period of the war, when it was accustomed to maintain direct contact with the Leitstellen as well as each Intercept station.[27]

  • Operational Planning: This section dealt with all planning for monitoring operations on each of the fronts. This section also prepared organisation and equipment tables and the allocation of personnel to e.g. Intercept outstations. In view of the rapid expansion of the section at the beginning of the war, this was considerable task.
  • Personnel: Routine personnel matters relating to the whole section.
  • War Diary: An officer maintained the official War diary of the Chi-Stelle.
  • Research: Captured equipment was examined, repaired and put into general use. Liaison was maintained by the technicians to the Luftwaffe Office of Technical Equipment.

The management of Referat A was not subject to much change. Some personnel accompanied the Chi-Stelle Chief to the Luftwaffe Advanced HQ on the Eastern Front, but the technical research section remained in Marstell. Personnel of this Referat were mostly civil service employees with a small mix of military officers and enlisted men.[28]

Referat B

Chart that details what signals battalion the specific Luftflotten was assiged to.

During the interwar period, Referat B had compiled what it considered excellent records of the Royal Air Fore. It possessed knowledge of the organisation, including locations of airfields, strength of units, types of aircraft used, and a complete understanding the RAF supply chain. After the outbreak of the war, Great Britain began to encipher its radio communication, making it became harder to maintain the overall picture of the RAF. Thanks to documents captured in the first days of the war, RAF reconnaissance messages could be immediately decoded. This resulted in the creation of an tactical evaluation section which would work in closest cooperation with the Kriegsmarine and B-Dienst.[29] During this period Wireless telegraphy section was working to annihilate the RAF Fighter Command.

Before the conquest of France, W-Leit 2 and its several out stations had supplied the Referat for intercepts for evaluation. After the occupation of France, W-Leit 5 with outstations, was established in Oslo to monitor Scotland and the northern section. W-Leit 3 which had originally been used in the Battle of France, was transferred to Paris to monitor the RAF. The Referat was now performing the final evaluation of intercepts from the work of three SI battalions. The attention of the High Command was devoted solely to the war in the West.[29] This was indicated by the transfer of a substantial part of the Luftwaffe General Staff to France in September 1940. In October, they were joined by the HQ of the Chi-Stelle and Referat B, which at the time was the most important section in the unit. For the Chi-Stelle staff, the placement in Paris was a short duration, as they returned to Marstall in December to plan the preparation for Operation Barbarossa. Referat B, however, remained at Asnières-sur-Oise until the Allied breakthrough by the Americans at Avranches forced the unit to withdraw from France.[30]

The move to France had a very considerable effect on the work of the Referat. Its location in the vicinity of SI battalions and Intercept out-stations made for excellent cooperation. The setting in the Paris locale, enabled Referat B to adapt its work to meet the tactical and strategic requirements of the war situation. The increasing amount of intercepted material resulting from the intensive monitoring of Great Britain meant an increasing amount of personnel, and by mid 1941, it had reached 60 men. The new military personnel were often excellent linguists or translators and the idea of the old civil service employee was fading.[31]

During this time, Ferdinand Feichtner, who had had started training W-Leit 3 staff at the Chi-Stelle Academy in Söcking, was appointed Chief of Referat B. Feichtner who was supported by Colonel Gosewisch of General Wolfgang Martinis office, made certain that the Referat maintained its position in the subsequent reorganisation of the SI unit, that was made necessary with the withdrawal of W-Leit 2. Feichtner then completely reorganised Referat B internally, in regards to personnel and division of work, e.g. the best evaluators were used to create a final evaluation section to prepare for the newly-introduced monthly reports. Feichtner also created a navigational aids evaluation section.[32]

During the first half of 1941, an SI company was activated in Asnieres as part of the Chi battalion. It was composed of three platoons:

  • the first comprised the personnel of the Referat.
  • the second was cryptanalysts who were moved from Paris to the area to work in the Referat.
  • A large W/T intercept platoon, was placed in a neighbouring village in the summer of 1941 to monitor traffic from the United States, using a special Antenna that was erected for this purpose. This company had an average strength of 400 men.

In contrast to the SI battalion, where administrative and operational command had very early had been subordinated to the battalion commander, these two function remained segregated in the Chi-Stelle until the end of the war. This may have been done to ensure the Referart's chain of command greater freedom of action, compared with other commanders. From the viewpoint of the enlisted me, many incidents, especially at the start of the war, arose from the strained relationships between military commanders and their superiors in the Referat. However, within the Chi-Stelle, the polite atmosphere of higher command was always maintained.[33]

Referat C

After the Chi-Stelle regorg in 1938, Referat C became responsible for French and Italian traffic. Owing to the change in German foreign policy, monitoring of Italy gradually dwindled, until Italy joined Germany in the Axis and declared war on France on 10 June 1940. The interception of radio traffic from Italy was then forbidden by Reichsmarschall Hermann Göring. From then on, Italy was monitored clandestinely and without the knowledge of Göring. The interception of French traffic by W-Leit 3 was bore excellent results. A regular supply of reports sent by Referat C to the General Staff and French Air Ministry documents captured by the unit, bore testament to this. After the completion of the Battle of France on 25 June 1940, the work of the Referat was terminated, taking over a year to wind down.[34]

From the start of the war, RAF overseas R/T traffic was monitored by Referat B. In the spring of 1941 and after the Balkan Campaign, the Luftwaffe started to use bases in Italy, for participating in the Battle of the Mediterranean, with a plan to establish a number of intercept stations. Accordingly, this small sub-section, that had increased in size to three men, was recalled to the Marstall in May 1941. This small groups was to be the nucleus of a final evaluation centre for RAF Mediterranean and Near East traffic. For this purpose, it was increased in size by the addition of English speaking translators and evaluations from the French section. Due to the long distances between Potsdam and the Italian Intercept stations, combined with personnel problems, it was a long time before the Referat C could produce radio intelligence.[35]

Referat D

During the interwar period, Referat D evaluated traffic intercepts from the Soviet Union, Czechoslovakia, Poland and the Balkan States. From 25 June 1940, after the other nation states had been conquered, the Referat worked exclusively on Soviet Union traffic, which had been considered of prime importance from the beginning. The development of section was different compared to other Referet, due to the different structure of the unit in the east. Whereas in the west and south, cryptanalysis had been abandoned to an extent, with the main focus now being traffic analysis and W/T evaluation, in the east, the majority of enciphered messages could be read. Another fundamental distinction, was that in the west, the Allies emerged with a new or revolutionary radio or radar technique, while in the eastern theatre brought relatively few technical innovations. During the course of the war, the Soviet air armies developed their own particular radio procedure.[36]

Referat D was initially stationed in the Marstall, and at the end of 1941, moved to Ruciane-Nida (Niedersee). In spring 1942, it moved with the General Staff, in preparation of large scale operations in the southern section, to Žitomir, where it was stationed until May 1943. It retreated to Warsaw at the beginning of 1944, where it established a Meldekopf, that was incorporated into the Command Post for Radio Evaluation (German: Zentraler Gefechtsstand für Funkauswertung) (ZAF). After Soviet troops overran Minsk, and began to threaten Warsaw, it moved to the university city of Cottbus. Towards the end of 1944, it merged with the regimental evaluation company of SI Regiment, East.[37]

Organisation

Referat D only sent reports directly to General Staff only during the first two years of the war. At the end of 1942 a liaison team was established in the operations office (Ic) to deal with intercepts originating in the East. The reports produced by the section were highly specialised and essentially unintelligible to the non-specialist, so they were rewritten by the liaison team. The team had 10 members, who were generally highly qualified. The Referat had a large cryptanalysis platoon attached to it, consisting of around 90 men at the height of the war. But its importance dwindled in the last years of the war, as Soviet cryptographic systems became ever more individual in character and centralized cryptanalysis of the intercept was found to be impractical.[38]

Also attached to the unit was a large radio intercept platoon which monitored point-to-point networks in the Soviet Union rear defence zones. An intercept company located in Rzeszów forwarded intercepts by teleprinter to the Referat, who sent them to the cryptanalysis platoon to be deciphered. The second main source of the reports was teleprinted summaries from three intercepts in battalions in the east. From 1943 onwards, R/T traffic from Soviet tactical aviation units increased in significance, even being important to final evaluation. During the latter years of the war, it was particularly important on the northern sector where the availability of good landline communications limited the use of radio.[39]

Meldekopf Warsaw

The Meldekopf in Warsaw consisted of a team of 10 specialists. As Soviet long-range bombers were active only at night, both its radio operators and evaluations alike were only occupied at night. The unit intercepted traffic on all known bomber frequencies and was reported to the nearest ZAF as an early warning. The Luftwaffe considered neither the radio discipline nor the navigation of the Soviet bomber crews to be comparable with the Allied crews in the west. The Meldekopf would report to the ZAF, and to other appropriate HQs, the exact strength, composition, and probable target of enemy bomber formations. This information was determined around the time the Soviet bombers were cross the front lines.[40]

Referat E

For the initial development of Referat E, i.e., supposed cryptography section, started from October 1935 until early 1939, when interpreters and translators that were newly employed by the German Ministry of Aviation were sent to fixed intercept stations of the German Army in Königsberg to monitor the Soviet Union and Baltic states, Treuenbrietzen to monitor the Soviet Union, Breslau station to intercept Czechoslovakian and Polish traffic, Munich for Italian traffic, Stuttgart for French traffic and Münster for monitoring traffic in Great Britain. After a period of training, they were assigned to Luftwaffe SI stations.[41]

Instruction in cryptanalysis was not provided for, nor did it take place. It was known that several civil service employees has contact with personnel within the field of cryptography and through this became familiar with its general outline. After the formation of the Luftwaffe Chi-Stelle was created in 1939, Referat E was formed and became responsible for all cryptanalysis within the unit. In October 1938, a 4-week training course was established in Berlin for the study of cryptanalytic methods in the west. In spring 1939, a similar training course was instituted for the east, and evaluations from the fixed intercept station were ordered to attend.[41]

When World War II started, the Chi-Stelle had 15-18 decipherer's, 10 of whom were familiar with the cryptology techniques used by the Allies, but none could be rated as an excellent cryptanalysts. These men were all eventually removed from the unit. Instead to assist in the work, that was now plentiful in nature, the Chief Signal Officer assigned 50 newly inducted enlisted men to Referat E, none of whom had, had any previous training in cryptanalysis. The personnel learned their trade in practical experience rather than in theory.[41]

The development of the Referat worked by exploring in detail a new difficult cryptographic procedure while stil in the Marstall, and then exporting that deciphering process to those intercept battalions or companies where the greatest amount traffic was being intercepted. In this manner, Referat E personnel were eventually stationed all over Europe.[42]

The Referat expanded continually and by the end of 1942 reached its peak strength of approximately 400 men. Later policy by the German High Command meant the unit was stripped of physically-fit men for use in combat units with replacements being women auxiliaries, caused the ongoing cryptanalyis to suffer a set-back. However, the more important systems were still solved up to the very end of the war, and even in the month of January 1945, the unit solved 35000 message intercepts in the west, and 15000 in the east.[42]

The chief of the Referat Ferdinand Voegele was an Inspector-Technician (German: Inspektor-Techniker), who until 1943 had no assistants who were officers, even though he was continually compelled to visit Intercept stations in the course of his work. An ongoing difficulty in the work of the referat, which continually manifested itself, was that it had no influence on the number or location of intercept receivers covering traffic in which it was interested.[42] This often caused delay and in some cases stalled the cryptanalysis pipeline or made it impossible.[43]

Training

After a few hours of instruction, novice Luftwaffe cryptanalysts were promptly put to work, the solving of which was in various stages of advancement. After a few weeks the novice was then shifted to a new procedure, as part of a mechanical process in a manner that would enable them in time to learn the different methods of solution. The emphasis was on breaking a cypher or code quickly, with matters of theory of secondary importance.[43]

The advantage of this method was that individuals could learn in the shortest possible time to successfully decipher certain well known systems such as the Bomber Code and the British Main Weather Code. However, these cryptanalysts failed completely when attempting to break a simple, alphabetic, unrecyphered 3 or 4-digit codes, even if an ample depth was available. The long duration of the war, gradually reduced this disadvantage since each analyst eventually had the opportunity of working of entirely different systems.[43]

In general, experience showed that men over the age of 35 years, made for below average cryptanalysts. Professional people, like academics, e.g. mathematicians and Philologists, with individual exceptions proved unsuitable for practical deciphering work. As a rule, they exhausted themselves in laborious analytical research, only to find later that the cypher or code had already been solved. The best results were achieved with young people who had completed their high school education or had just entered a university.[44]

1942-1945

General

The great widening of the battle front and the prodigious expenditure of men and material forced the German Command, following the first grim winter in the Soviet Union, to adopt radical economy measures. Thus, the Luftwaffe Signal Corps, that had suffered relatively slight losses, was referred to the pool of women workers for its replacements, as the men were being striped from Luftwaffe units for the front.[44]

The importance of radar intercept, moreover, that by the middle of 1942, had finally become production ready, had become decisive to the development of the chi-stelle in the west and caused significant structural changes. At the same time, as German strategy swung to the defensive, the chi-stelle emerged as the most reliable source of radio intelligence. As the Allied air offensive unfolded, its importance to the defense of Germany became apparent, not only to the High Command, but to tactical headquarters as well, and from then on, both were concerned that its organisation become optimal. From the beginning of the war, command of the Chi-Stelle unit had changed hands frequently, with unsatisfactory leaders.[44] The Luftwaffe General staff officer Ferdinand Feichtner who was considered to have an excellent reputation with the General Staff, took command of the unit in February 1943.[45]

At the same time the Chi-Stelle, at least in the west, was freed from the administrative management of the signal regiments of the Luftflotten by the creation of an independent Signals Intelligence regiment. This regiment had three battalions, one of which was devoted exclusively to radar intercept. This stronger centralisation had a favourable effect on future development. The number of impediments to which a relatively young branch of the service was inevitably subjected was considerably reduced by the excellent relations between the Commanding Office of the Chi-Stelle and the General Staffs.[46]

At the end of 1942, the Radar Intercept Control Centre was created in Eiche for the central evaluation of the results of radar intercept. Radar intercept centres were also brought into being at the same locations as the W-Leit of the Luftflotten, and gradually within the boundaries of Germany itself. Chi-Stelle determined policy, and planned the expansion of the Radar Intercept Service, while the development of processes was left to the out-stations and the commanders of the Referat. In this aspect, Chi-Stelle purpose was essentially one of administration and supply.[47]

The Chi-Stelle from 1943 was no longer distinguished by creative ideas. The choice of an officer with no signal or intelligence training as Director of so highly specialised a service was not a fortunate one. Briefing of the General Staff was the direct function of the Referat. Each Referat chief, in proportion to his ability, made the influence of his Referat felt on the evaluation work of his respective Leitstelle. Except for personnel and administrative matters, those Leitstellen which were capably commanded were completely independent of the Chi-Stelle. An example of this separation of concerns, was that many times they even procured special signal equipment or communication facilities from the tactical units they served, rather than go through the normal Chi-Stelle channel.[48]

The Chi-Stelle also failed, when the time was right, to mold the unit into a comprehensive and exclusive organisation with its own military standards. On the contrary, in the autumn 1944 when signals regiments were formed in the west, south and east, bureaucracy intervened to create two extraneous posts. The first one was an Signal Intelligence Director for administrative matters, the second new post was that of Signals Intelligence Leader (German: Funkaufklärungsführer Reich), pertaining to the defense of Germany.[49]

Organisation

The structure of Chi-Stelle was essentially the same since the beginning of the war, and had developed along two main lines. Tactical evaluation from 1943, had become predominant and had resulted in the establishment of early warning and flight tracking systems.[50] The development of tactical evaluation was fostered by the increasing strength of Allied air raids on both the occupied countries and Germany, and it far exceeded the importance of strategic evaluation. This work culminated in the creation of the ZAF [Ref 3.2.4], a central Meldekopf for the defense of the Reich.The Chi-Stelle remained both indifferent and helpless in the face of this development, with the result that the position of Chief Signals Intelligence, a parallel headquarters had to be created to manage signals matters pertaining to Germany. Secondly, the unification of the Chi-Stelle, that by 1942 had expanded into an organisation of division strength and was urgently in need of an independent administrative system in consideration of its special function, finally in 1944, proved most necessary. Discussions to solve this problem had begun in 1941, but postponed continually.[51] However, since Chi-Stelle planned and supervised all signals intelligence operations from the beginning, it could easily acted as its own central administrative authority. In the spring of 1944, the first of these reorganisations took place. All signal intelligence units, including the Chi-Stelle which previously had been under the command of the Ministry of Aviation were now placed under the tactical command of the Chief Signals. 3rd Division, Lt. Colonel Ferdinand Feichtner whose rank was (German: Generalnachrichten Führer) (General Nafue III).[52]

This centralisation in tactical matters and the decentralisation in administrative affairs to the field command units, led to difficulties in guidance and supply. As a result, in November 1944, after an abortive order by Hermann Göring to unify all Luftwaffe signal intelligence units through combining all listening, jamming and radio traffic units as part of Air Signal Regiments, a new comprehensive organisation was finally created.[52] This new organisation unified all home and field units into independent air signals Regiments and battalions with unit numbers ranging from 350 to 359. Administration was centralised and subordinated to a Senior Signal Intelligence Officer, Generalmajor Klemme, a veteran signals officer, who held the position of (German: Höherer Kommandeur der Luftnachrichten-Funkaufklärung).[52]

From 1941 to 1944 the signals intelligence battalion in the Marstall consisted of:

  • A company in the Marstall which comprised the personnel of Referat A, C and E.[53]
  • A company in Asnières-sur-Oise comprising the personnel of Referat B, part of the personnel of Referat E and an intercept platoon.
  • A company in Žitomir, later Warsaw comprising personnel of Referat D and a large intercept platoon and Meldekopf.
  • A company in Munich, Oberhaching comprising personnel of Referat B5 and an intercept platoon to monitor the United States.[54]
  • An intercept company in Rzeszów which monitored Soviet point to point traffic.[55]

After the withdrawal from France, the company in Asnières-sur-Oise was dissolved and Referat B greatly reduced in personnel, was migrated into the evaluation company of signals intelligence regiment west. The company in Rzeszów which had moved to Namslau in the middle of 1944, was transferred to the signals intelligence regiment east, and for practical purposes it already belonged. Referat D was incorporated into the evaluation company of this regiment when the latter left Cottbus and retreated to the southwest while under attack from the Soviet advance. In February 1945, the Marstall was abandoned.[56]

In the autumn of 1944, the Chi-Stelle battalion, as had been the case with of all signals intelligence battalions, became independent of the Luftwaffe Signal Corps Regiment to which it had been assigned. Command was taken over by a captain who was given the prerogatives of a regimental commander. It was renamed Air Intelligence Department 350 (German: Luftnachrichten Abteilung 350) and retained its previous function of planning for the entire Luftwaffe signals intelligence infrastructure. In reality, the command structure, and unit organisation had not changed at all, in spite of the battalion commander, Captain Jordens, the administrative chief, General Klemme, and the Funkaufklärungsführer Reich, Colonel Forster, Lt. Colonel Ferdinand Feichtner as the representative of the Chief Signal Officer, remained the supreme until the end of the unit.[57]

Liaison

Liaison and channels of communication of Chi-Stelle in the west and Germany with Luftwaffe Staffs, German Army and Kriegsmarine.

The Referats were the supreme authority on all evaluation questions arising between the regiments, battalions and the Chi-Stelle. They furnished intelligence directly to the General Staff where an liaison officer had been assigned since 1942.[58] Section II of the Office of the Chief Signal Officer only had communication with individual units insofar as to pass them orders. The final preparation of reports decided by Referat. The responsibility for distribution of the reports was decided by the Chi-Stelle Director who acted in consultation with the Chief Signal officer.

Liaison with B-Dienst, the Kriegsmarine cipher bureau and General der Nachrichtenaufklärung, the German Army cipher bureau, as well as the Radio Defense Corps was carried out at both the level of the Referat and at the Leitstellen, which exchanged reports with Navy and Army cipher bureaux located in their respective areas. However, owing to the extreme secrecy which surrounded all activity at the unit, the process of exchange was not perfect. For example, the close and happy liaison between the Luftwaffe and the Radio Defense Corps regarding partisan activity (Yugoslav Partisans) in the Balkans was founded on the relationship between two Leutnants, who despite instructions to the contrary, exchanged intelligence on this subject.[59]

The three cipher bureau (German: Chiffrierstelle) exchanged reports, and in the case of the Luftwaffe, these were studied by the individual Referat. From 1942, a liaison officer from Referat B was assigned to the Army Chi-Stelle in Saint-Germain-en-Laye but no special benefits were derived from this close association.[60]

Chi-Stelle decided the extent of co-operation and liaison between Germany's allies, but the execution of process was decided by the signals intelligence units located in the various countries.[61]

The Finland cipher bureau, the Signals Intelligence Office (Finnish: Viestitiedustelutoimisto) was the only bureau that compared with Germany in terms of quality had made excellent progress on the cryptanalysis of Soviet (Russian) systems.[62]

Liaison with Japan did not exist, and contact with the Japanese on air signal intelligence could only take place through the General der Nachrichtenaufklärung, that received the monthly reports of the unit. It would seem probable that the Japanese signal intelligence bureau would be interested in reports of special fields, such as the 8th USAAF or Allied navigational procedures, would have been furnished by the GDNA. In the last year of the war, and at the request of the Japanese, it was intended to send a German mission, comprising medium frequency and High frequency specialists of the Luftwaffe, Heer and Kriegsmarine to Japan. Strangely the Japanese were not interested in VHF or radar interception and jamming. Planning for the trip was organised by Major Mettich and Captain Grotz, who were both subordinated to Colonel Hugo Kettler, who was in command of OKW/Chi. However, the plan never materialised.[63]

Referat A

When the Chi-Stelle was taken over by General Staff officer, Ferdinand Feichtner in the spring of 1942, it resulted in the Lietstellen being supported in a previously unaccustomed manner.[64] In order to meet the increasing demands within the unit for personnel and equipment, the Chi-Stelle initiated a strict management control policy. the development and procurement of radio receivers was also problematic and involved negotiations with the manufactures, who with long supply chains, demanded notification of orders long in advance. Problems with personnel bounded, with the personnel officer whose only experience was the Eastern Front, while Friedrich's staff didn't have one officer who had experience of working against the Anglo-American Allies.[65] Therefore, the Chi-Stelle command had little understanding of the problems existing in the west and south. The problems were compounded by individuals who lacked tactical experience, particularly Captain Trattner, Commander of Radar Intercept at LN Abteilung 356, who was a professor of electronics. It can be stated that Referat A had a short-sighted policy as regard to personnel, as well as an indecisive and dilatory manner when it needed to handle personnel problems affecting the entire unit.[65]

Referat B

General

In contrast to other units and sections of the Chi-Stelle, Referat B maintained a constant and purposeful policy towards its own personnel. When the former Director of the unit was ordered back to the Marstall in mid-1942, his place was taken by a career officer who removed the last vestiges of the civil service regime from the Referat.[66] Daily conferences and a number of experienced combat officers were brought in and employed to advise the evaluations in the various desks. The personnel of the Referat was now continuously trained, and were accorded all privileges possible with military functions, such as drilling kept to the minimum. As a result, morale in the unit was considered excellent.[66]

At the end of 1942, some of the personnel was replaced by women auxiliaries. Shortly before the Normandy landings, the Referat consisted of 4 officers, 3 technicians, 45 enlisted me, and 25 auxiliaries.[66] After the withdrawal from France in August 1944, the Referat was merged with the evaluation company of Signal Regiment West. Personnel was reduced by more than half. At the end of the war, with the advancing Allies, the unit moved to Türkheim in Bavaria when it was subsequently dissolved.[66]

Organisation

Allied traffic intercepts increased significantly when the RAF expanded from 1942 onwards, and the arrival of American Air Forces in the British Isles.[67] This resulted in a reorganisation of Referat B, which was gradually implemented during 1942. Later the desks of the Referat were organised to correspond to Allied air unit categories, rather than types of radio traffic. The organisation was as follows:

  • Technical evaluation section which evaluated RAF Coastal Command intercept and during the Normandy landings and with air support, evaluated intercepted party traffic.
  • Bomber evaluation section, divided into Royal Air Force and United States Army Air Forces desks, which were concerned with the strategic evaluation of this traffic.
  • Captured documents, captured signal equipment and navigational aids, evaluation sections.
  • Tactical air force radio traffic evaluation desk.

The Referat has its own mimeograph and technical drawing section. The teleprinter and telephone section was operated exclusively by women.[68]

Evaluation

Referat B was the senior evaluation agency in the west, and evaluated all the work of the signal intelligence units employed in the west and the north.[69] This consisted of:

  • Luftnachrichten-Funkhorch-Regiment West that later became LN Abteilung-Regiment 351
  • LN Abteilung-Battalion 357
  • LN Abteilung-Battalion 355

The Referat worked with reports forwarded to it from intercept and evaluation companies, and also with the original log sheets and messages. The latter method was used for Radio telegraphy, as the spoken word was always open to interpretation. The material available to the Referat consisted of the following:

  • Daily reports from evaluation and some intercept companies, that were sent by teleprinter and in some most cases by radio or courier.[69]
  • Technical and evaluation reports which the intercept companies prepared monthly.[69]
  • Wireless and Radio telegraphy log sheets.[69]
  • Prisoner of war interrogations' reports, reports on captured documents and kit. Reports on BBC broadcasts and other collateral intelligence material. This interpolation of this material was strictly forbidden, and when used, a reference was provided to the source and if this was missing a reprimand from Ic operations to the Referat chief resulted. It was provided to bring a richer background to intelligence reports.[69]

It was advantageous that personnel of Referat B belonged to Chi-Stelle as intelligence could be report or when necessary refused to be divulged under certain conditions without reference to rank or station. The last two chiefs of the Referat were adroit at using their position to maintain a close check on the evaluation work in the west.[70] Duplication of work between Referat B and Luftnachrichten-Funkhorch-Regiment West was an ongoing bureaucratic problem and the only considered solution was the merging of the two units, but it was only realized as the result of Allied pressure, when both Referat B and Luftnachrichten-Funkhorch-Regiment West, following a breakthrough by the Allied at Avranches as part of Operation Cobra by the United States 1st Army, retreated from France. Owing to the difficult housing situation within Germany, the Referat and the evaluation company were established in the same house in Limburg. For each case arising, a discussion took place as to whether a special report or appreciation would be written by the Referat or the specific company from Luftnachrichten-Funkhorch-Regiment West.[70]

Direction of Intercept operations

Outside of final evaluation, the direction of intercept cover in the west and north was the most important task for the Referat. All intercept stations understandably had the desire to monitor only that traffic which yielded results.[70] The referat had to insure that not only was this traffic covered, but also those frequencies necessary to obtain a correct intelligence estimate.[70] For example, several intercept companies could only be moved under pressure to monitor point-to-point networks of the RAF and the Allied Expeditionary Air Force, as no tactical messages that could be reported to combat units were intercepted on those networks. However, these networks still had to be monitored, as it was necessary to understand the organisation of Allied air forces.[71]

With the appearance of new allied units which needed to be monitored, intercept companies found it difficult to burden themselves with the intercept requirements of the new allied units. In that instance, Referat B would intervene, and reorganise the intercept and evaluation companies accordingly, as per need and personnel available.[71]

In many cases Referat B itself would take over the analysis of new traffic, and only then would they subsequently assign it to the appropriate evaluation company.[71]

Messages and Reports

The most important headquarters to which the Referat reported were:

In many cases reports were also sent to the commander west, Luftflotte 3 and NAAS 5 of Army signals intelligence regiment KONA 5.[71] The following types of messages and reports were involved:

  • Flash reports of important new discoveries, enemy movements of Allied units, that were sent by telephone and teleprinter.[71]
  • A 24-hour daily summary report.[72]
  • Monthly reports comprising 50-60 typewritten pages of exhaustive treatment of all events and developments during the month, complete with maps and illustrative diagrams.[72]
  • Special reports, e.g. on Army-Air Force collaboration during manoeuvres in the Great Britain.[72]

Moreover, all important information found in captured material was communicated to individual signals intelligence units. The latter received from Referat B all necessary data such as lists of X and Q groups, lists of frequencies, Call signs, abbreviations and so on.[72]

Referat B5

In 1941, a section within Referat B was established to monitor and intercept traffic from the United States. This in turn was divided into two desks. One desk analysed traffic which was related to United States Army Air Forces, the other to United States Navy air forces, which at the time were being hastily built up. Traffic from America was ready from intercept stations in Germany, France and Norway. The desk reached its peak in late 1942, early 1943, when new equipment was becoming scarce and this dictated a more conservative use of radio receivers. The second section desk intercepted air ferry traffic on the North Atlantic route, in connection to RAF Coastal Command. The Atlantic traffic was monitored by Referat C until 1942, when it reached peak importance. As the war progressed, and United States cryptography steadily improved to an extent it could no longer be read, Referat B took responsibility of this South Atlantic commitment from Referat C.[72]

As Allied air ferry traffic increased in importance it was decided to detach the desk from Referat B in mid 1943, and move it into its own section. Specialist personnel from Referat C were moved to Oberhaching and the new section was renamed Referat B5.[72] At the same time a large wireless telegraphy intercept platoon that belonged to the Marstall battalion, was moved to Oberhaching and attached to Referat B5 to take over monitoring of air ferry traffic except those on North Atlantic route, which were covered by the 16th Company of Lichtenstein Regiment (LNR) 3 in Angers.[73] The new Referat evaluated all air ferry traffic, e.g. Morse code, Baudot code, and had the following responsibilities:

  • The monitoring of the United States, which only touched the surface of the traffic, still furnished insight into the principal networks of the Army and Naval Air Forces, into training activity, air transport, defence zones, and the activation of new combat aviation units.[73]
  • The monitoring of Atlantic air ferry service. The middle and central Atlantic routes were monitored by the W/T platoon in Oberhaching and by Luftwaffe signals outstations in Spain, which operated under the cover-name of Purchasing Agencies (Fig 3). The North Atlantic route was monitored by the 16th Company of LNR 3 and reported furnished to the Referat.[73]
  • The monitoring of the RAF Transport Command and both USAAF and RAF troop carrier commands. The greater part of this interception was also carried out in Oberhaching.[73]

Airfield radio traffic, transmitted on 6440 Hz was intercepted in Madrid, Montpellier and at various outstations in the Balkans and Italy. This traffic was evaluation by Referat B5 with the aid of an extensive intelligence library encompassing charts, diagrams, directories, manuals, maps, phone directories and so on.[74] Referat B5 also had a small cryptanalysis section of its own, which deciphered intercepted messages on the spot.[74]

Referat B5 remained operational until the last weeks of the war, and was in a position to cover the British airborne landing at Bocholt.[74] One week before the capture of Munich by the US 20th Armored Division. US 3rd Infantry Division, US 42nd Infantry Division and US 45th Infantry Divisions, the male members of Referat B5 withdrew to the Alps, while its women auxiliaries were discharged.[74]

Referat C

General

When the importance of the Mediterranean theatre increased in the middle of 1942, the totally incapable director of this Referat was relieved from office at the instigations of General Staff operations, and replaced by the director of Referat B.[74] At the same time, several experience evaluations were transferred to Referat C in order to mentor and assist new staff and this served to increase morale in the unit. In general, the operational methodology of the unit was similar to units in the west.[74] In spite of wire communication to Sicily and Greece being considered reliable, the great distances to the Mediterranean theatre presented problems. Tactical evaluation was lacking and daily reports were always 2 days behind schedule.[74]

Referat C was considered unproductive, inefficient and bureaucratic. During the entire period of its existence it failed to produce a single technical or special report, in spite of the fact there was sufficient material from was activity in the Mediterranean area. In early 1943, the number of personnel in the agency was increased with 20 women auxiliaries, with the emphasis shifted entirely to paper work.[75] During this period the agency was completed detached from problems in the Mediterranean area.

This condition became worse in 1944-1945 as duty hours were increased, rations became viewer and bombing raids became more frequent. The prevalence of political sycophants, the threat of being sent to the Eastern Front, the threat of transfer via disciplinary action, all served to suppress and curb the agency personnel working 12 hours or more a day. Messages and reports from the retreating signals units in the south became scarcer and scarcer.[75] After the formation of Luftnachrichten Abteilung 352 in spring 1943, a merger of the Referat and the regimental evaluation company was considered, but never carried out. In February 1945, the unit disbanded, with parts of the unit travelling to Premstätten in Styria and later in Attersee. Although reduced in size, it started to function again under command of a new energetic director. However this was short lived and in May it ceased activity.[75]

Organisation

Referat C was organised into desks which corresponded to Allied units or activities, e.g. Mediterranean Allied Tactical Air Force (MATAF), 205 Group RAF, long range reconnaissance, radar reporting networks, transport and ferry service, airfield radio tower traffic.[76] In addition, two other sections, one devoted to press reports and prisoner of war intelligence, and other to point-to-point networks were especially successful. The two sections, in close co-operation, maintained a detailed organisational plan of Mediterranean Allied Air Forces(MAAF), that the Luftwaffe operations office included in its monthly reports.[76]

The following desks were attached to Referat C:

  • Turkey. 3 men revised and edited the material intercepted and evaluated by W-Leit South-east, and prepared weekly and quarter-yearly for operations.[76]
  • Sweden and Free France. Monitored by outstations with monthly reports were forwarded to operations. After the German withdrawal from France, the desk was reintegrated to Referat B.[76]
  • Referat C2. This section was created in 1942, and was engaged in preparing a textbook on the radio, navigational procedures and Call signs of the Royal Air Force, United States Army Air Forces and Russian Air Forces. This textbook has a wide distribution, and all larger signals units were given copies for research. Supplements were produced which kept the work up to date. In mid 1944, the work was abandoned and the personnel transferred to signals outstations.[76]

An intercept station also existed in the Marstall itself, and was manned by linguists from Referat C and E. Its primary function was to monitor and intercept traffic that indicated a bomber read in the greater Berlin area by the USAAF. As the Marstall was responsible for the allocation of VHF receivers, the equipment in the intercept station was the best of its type.[77] The proximity of the Referat proved advantageous, as the R/T technicians manned their sets only during a bombing raid and therefore could devote the balance of their time to either evaluation of cryptanalysis.[77] Flash reports were telephoned to Meldekopf 3 stationed in Wannsee, while final evaluation reports were sent to the ZAF.[77]

Operations

Each morning the teleprinted material arrived during the previous night from the two signal battalions in Italy and the Balkans,[77] from the company in Montpellier, outstations in Spain, and later from the ZAF, as well as from those outstations which were authorized to have direct communication with the Referat. The intercepted material was sorted, categorised by the Referat director and distributed to the appropriate desks.[77] In the course of the afternoon, the desk would check the incoming intercept. If it could be read, it was deciphered, and evaluated immediately. If it could not be, it was sent to cryptanalysis. Deciphered reports were prepared for inclusion in the daily report of the Referat. After being edited by the evaluation officer, the intercept formed the basis for the daily situation conference at which all controversial points were discussed.[77] It was then Mimeographed and around noon it would be ready for distribution. One copy was sent by courier to the General Staff, the others were mailed to the recipients.

The afternoon as a rule was devoted to the study of incoming reports and a review of log sheets in from the units in the field; maps were prepared and preliminary work done on the monthly report, the distribution of which corresponded in principle to that of Referat B reports.[77] Correspondence with the regiments and battalions was taken care of, comments from the General Staff were studied and those relevant were passed on to the field units concerned.[77]

The Referat achieved success in the field of traffic analysis. By means of network diagrams, the organisation of the Allied tactical air forces in Italy was worked out at a time when W-Leit 2, in spite of its greater proximity to the situation and its operational experience with abundant wireless telegraphy (W/T) and R/T reports of XII Tactical Air Command and Department of the Air Force (DAF), was completely helpless.[78] In general, as clumsiness, distrust and dodging of responsibility characterised the leadership of Referat C. In order to keep its surplus of personnel occupied, ridiculous and unnecessary tasks, involving a labyrinth of paper work were created. As a result, all feeling for conciseness was lost. The majority of members of the Referat, in spite of years of service in the Chi-Stelle, had never seen an out-station. This reluctance to face realities, weakened the influence of the Referat.[78] In consequence, its options in organisational matters carried little weight within German High Command, and for most part it was limited to special problems of evaluation.[78]

Liaison

Liaison also was limited to the field of evaluation. Due to the location of the Chi-Stelle and personal acquaintances, especially with Luftwaffe Ic, it was considered excellent.[78] Prior to the daily conference, any new problems and all the material that had come in the previous night, were discussed by telephone between the Referat and the operations office, Ic of the Luftwaffe. The discussions that took place included Allied air transport and the current air ferry situation reported by Referat B5 in Oberhaching.[78]

When United States radio stations appeared on airfields in the Poltava area, as US bombers and fighters escort landed in these airfields, following attacks on Germany or Rumania, an evaluator from Referat C was dispatched to Referat D in Warsaw. A large intercept platoon was transferred to Warsaw to monitor this traffic.[78] However, the results were insignificant and after fourth months the W/T platoon was recalled.[79]

In 1944, the Referat places a liaison officer with Dulag Luft, that resulted in many pieces of collateral intelligence being collected, as well as important confirmation of previously gathered intelligence.[79]

In the last months of the war, the Referat was merged with the evaluation company of Regiment South.

Radio Defense Corps

History of operations in the west

History of operations in the south

Operations in the south

General

While the Luftwaffe signal intelligence in the west reached a higher state of development, it was in the south that it faced its greater challenge. This was true because it faced a foe as equally as aggressive and resourceful, an extremely varied physical environment and geographical extent of the Mediterranean theatre of war, wherein its operations were conducted.[80]

Mid 1941

History of operations in the east

Operations in the east

Luftwaffe operations in the east

General

The overall mission of the Luftwaffe Chi-Stelle on Soviet Front was the interception and identification of the Soviet Air Forces radio traffic.

To accomplish this mission, it was first necessary to determine the types of signal communication being used by the Soviets. For both Wireless telegraphy (WT) and Radiotelephone (RT), the high frequency band was used almost exclusively, the main exception being navigational aids, i.e. radio beacons, which were used on medium frequency. Until the end of 1942, only WT traffic was found, thereafter R/T was also employed, increasingly greatly from 1944 onwards. The Soviets used radar only to a small extent, beginning at the end of 1944. Almost all W/T traffic was encoded or enciphered.[81]

From Germany’s point of view, all Soviet W/T traffic could theoretically have been intercepted in one centrally located station. However, in practice it was found, as is so often the case, that areas of [skip], interference and natural barriers precluded such a plan and led to the establishment of numerous intercept stations all along the front.[81]

Cryptanalytic problems were solved by the use of a relatively large number of personnel, not a few of which were capable linguists and could also be used to translate the contents of decoded messages.[82]

A further problem occasioned by the expansiveness of the front was how to communicate the results of radio intelligence to those units and headquarters which could make the most of. The recipients of such intelligence were the Chi-Stelle, the operations (German: Ic) of the Luftflotten together with their tactical units on the Soviet Front, and the signal intelligence services of the Army and Navy. Therefore, pains had to be taken either to site Chi-Stelle units in the immediate areas of such headquarters or at least in localities where good wire communications was available. Due to the danger of interception, and delays caused by the necessity of enciphering messages, radio was considered only an auxiliary means of communication.[82]

Problems encountered on the Eastern front were of such a nature that axiomatic Chi-Stelle procedures and processes could often not be put into effect as a whole, but instead usually as a compromise solution.[82]

Development 1936 to 1941
Evolution of Luftwaffe east signals units from 1936 to 1940

Until the invasion of the Soviet Union on Sunday, 22 June 1941, interception of Soviet radio traffic was accomplished by several fixed outstations, each of which was assigned a prescribed area to monitor. In the summer of 1936, the first of these stations was established in Glindow, Berlin.[82] During the year between 1937 and 1938, five further stations were established in Breslau, Pulsnitz, Bydgoszcz, Svetloye (Kobbelbude) and Hirschstätten. Each of these fixed outstations did its own preliminary evaluation work, with final evaluation still undertaken at the Chi-Stelle. The stations were operationally controlled by the Chi-Stelle but administratively by a Luftflotten in whose area they were located. Thus the stations in Hirschstätten and Wrocław were assigned to Luftnachrichten Regiment 4, and the remained with Luftnachrichten Regiment 1.[83]

This policy was a great mistake and remained a point of contention with signals personnel throughout the war. It meant that signals units were subordinated to two unit commanders, and impossible situation from the military point of view. Frequent differences of opinion arose between High Command headquarters, each wishing to be considered as the authority actually controlling the Chi-Stelle. The situation was often intolerable.[83]

It soon became evident that the personnel and equipment available for the monitoring of Russian radio traffic, that was becoming constantly more extensive and complicated, were not sufficient. The Russian methods of assigning Call signs and frequencies became more and more complex. Special complications resulted from the fact that each Russian air army implemented its own signal procedures and cryptography standards, that according to the ability of the individual Russian signals officers, making it either more or less difficult for the Luftwaffe Chi-Stelle. There were some Soviet air armies, that owing to the incompetence or negligence of the signals officers, were looked upon with a sort of affection by the Chi-Stelle, while there were others whose traffic could only be analysed by bringing to bear all the resources that the Luftwaffe had available.[83]

The most difficult task of all was intercepts from the northern sector or lack thereof. This was due in part to the fact that good land-line communications existed in the Leningrad throughout the static warfare in that region.[83]

Owing to ever present personnel problems in the unit, the organisation of the Chi-Stelle unit during 1938 was not significantly expanded in the east. Luftflotten 1 and Luftflotten 4 requested their own signals intelligence unit, and each wished to received signal intercepts directly from the units located in its specified area, and not via the Chi-Stelle.[84] In order to meet these requirements, W-Leitstellen were created in the summer of 1938 in the immediate vicinity of each Luftlotte concerned. It was intended that these Leitstellen render interim reports to the Luftflotten, while expediting the intercepted material to the Chi-Stelle for further processing. The personnel, cryptanalysts and evaluations were drawn from the fixed signals outstations, and to a lesser extent from the Chi-Stelle. This withdrawal of personnel from an already weak organisation suffering from chronic staff shortages caused a deterioration in the unit, without any commensurate gain to the new entities.[84]

In the summer of 1939, the Leitstellen, the fixed stations and the mobile intercept companies on the two sectors were combined into signals intelligence battalions of the respective Luftlotte signal regiments.[84]

Evolution of Luftwaffe east signals units from 1941 to 1943

When Germany invaded Poland, the Luftwaffe signals units in the east were ordered as follows:

  • Referat D of the Chi-Stelle
  • The 3rd Battalion of Luftnachrichten Regiment 1 consisted of:
    • W-Leit 1 in Bernau
    • Fixed intercept station in Kobbelbude
    • Fixed intercept station in Bromberg, that was transferred from Pulsnitz.[84]
  • The 3rd Battalion of Luftnachrichten Regiment 4 consisted of:
    • W-Leit 4 in Vienna[85]
    • Fixed intercept station in Breslau
    • Fixed intercept station in Premstätten
    • 10th Company of LNR 4, newly activated and fought at the front during the Polish campaign.[85]

At the conclusion of the Polish campaign, monitoring of Polish communications was discontinued. Its place was taken by the Balkan countries and Turkey, that were monitored from Vienna, Premstätten and Budapest.[85]

In 1940 there were few changes. The fixed intercept stations in Bromberg was moved to Warsaw. An intercept station and DF facility was erected in Kirkenes and the station in Budapest established a satellite outstation in Constanța. A new intercept company called the 9th Company of LNR 4 was activated.[85]

This situation remained static until the invasion of the Soviet Union.

Signal Intelligence Regiment East organisation
Organisation of LN Abteilung 355

Luftnachrichten Abteilung 355 was activated in September 1944. The need on the part of the subordinate signals units for a more unified operational and administrative chain of command was only realised up to the level of regimental headquarters, and then only realised up to the level of regimental headquarters, and then only on paper, as the Chi-Stelle still continued to traffic directly with subordinate units of the regiment.[85] The regiment still suffered from divided control, operationally subordinated to the Chi-Stelle, and administratively to the Chief Signal Officer through Generalmajor Willi Klemme, who was not a specialist administrative officer.[86]

Luftnachrichten Abteilung 353 was organised as follows:

  • Regimental headquarters with the 25th Evaluation Company and 12th Intercept Company in Cottbus
  • 1st Battalion (north), formerly the 3rd Battalion of LNR 1, with four companies in East Prussia.
  • 2nd Battalion (centre), formerly Signals Battalion East with five companies in Poland.
  • 3rd Battalion (south), formerly the 3rd Battalion of LNR 4, with five companies in Austria.[86]

All the battalions had numerous intercept and DF outstations along the entire front.[86]

Owing to the Soviet advances, the regimental staff together with the 25th and 12th Companies moved to Dresden in mid February 1945. From there as the Allies advanced into Germany, the group retired to Alpine Redoubt. In order to ensure the continuity of operations, a platoon of about 70 signals personnel were formed, comprising evaluators, intercepts and communication personnel. The platoon was fully mobile, and carried the most necessary records and sufficient radio equipment for monitoring and communications purposes. It drove to Wagrain in the Northern Limestone Alps.[86] The regimental headquarters and companies followed more slowly as they were not fully mobile.

In Wagrain, the 2nd and 3rd Battalions joined the regiment, so that with the exception of the 1st Battalion, that remained in north Germany, the regiment was reassembled.[86]

After the surrender of Germany, the regiment proceeded via Zell am See and the Lake Chiemsee to the Luftwaffe concentration area at Aschbach in Austria. It was subsequently discharged.[87]

Intercept and DF Operations
Line of withdrawal of Luftwaffe signal units from the east

In the autumn of 1940, the construction of a large Rhombic antenna system was started, and once in operation, was to orientated to the east and south-east, for the purposes of exploring the possibilities of a central high frequency intercept stations. It was put into operations only shortly before the outbreak of the war with the Soviet Union in 1941 and good results were obtained. However it was never fully manned.[87]

The distribution of intercept receivers by type for the various monitoring tasks was made on a basis of the preferences of the individual signals units. It proved most advantageous, wherever possible, to assign a complete monitoring mission to a single company or outstation.[87]

Great use was found for the HF DF, A-10F that used an Adcock antenna type. However, for a war of movement it had to be made mobile. A good DF baseline, as well as an efficient method of controlling the operations of the DF's, was essential to the accomplishment of the regiment's mission. Special care had to be taken in planning D/F control by radio, which of course involved the encoding and decoding of messages, every second counted. The assignment of several targets to one D/F station proved unworkable.[87]

Cryptanalysis

The problem of securing sufficient and well qualified cryptanalyst personnel was at all times very great, since almost all messages, that numbered between 1000-2000 per day, were enciphered. To mitigate this problem, Chi-Stelle attempted to produce and train cryptanalysts itself. It was found that cryptanalysis skills were an inborn talent, and approximately one half of the personnel trained were proved useful. The chief reason why there were never sufficient cryptanalysts available may be laid to a tendency on the part of those men to specialise in certain types of codes and ciphers. It was also usually impractical to detach cryptanalysts to the various intercept companies, which in the interested of tactical evaluation would be advantageous.[88]

Cryptanalysts were mostly employed in the W-Leitstellen, or in evaluation companies where they, as well as evaluation personnel were in close contact of Referat E, that suffered a chronic shortage of staff. The introduction of new codes and new recipher table for old codes presented constant challenges for the cryptanalysts.[88]

An average of 60% to 70% of the 2-Figure, 3-Figure and 4-Figure messages were solved. 5-Figure messages often required painstaking analysis, and when solved were often not read in time to be of any strategic or tactical value.[88]

Evaluation
  • Traffic and Log Analysis for DF evaluation.[88]
The principal duties of these sub-sections were the identification of all call signs and frequencies,[88] and the reconstruction of Russian radio networks.[89] A corollary duty was to determine the system used by the various Soviet air armies in selecting their call-signs and frequencies and to attempt prediction of those to be used in the future.[89]
  • Tactical and final evaluation
As per traffic analysis, preliminary evaluation was undertaken by a fixed intercept station and the mobile intercept companies. Traffic was the forwarded to the W-Leitstellen or the evaluation companies where the traffic was evaluated, and reports prepared that were sent to the Chi-Stelle, the Luftflotten and the Fliegerkorps. Later these battalion evaluation reports were also sent to the regimental evaluation company, where they were compiled into a comprehensive report from the Chi-Stelle, where they were edited and passed to the Luftwaffe and Wehrmacht HQ.[89]
Signal Communications

Excellent signal reception was absolutely essential to the Chi-Stelle.[89] Experience from the Russian Front showed that the dissemination of intelligence from outstations to tactical aviation units had to be accomplished in a matter of minutes, and in some cases, seconds. For this reason, R/T stations of Signals Regiment East were located directly on the aerodrome of German fighter and reconnaissance units, and had direct wire lines to the fighter control centre.[90] The out-stations were also tied to the teleprinter switchboards of the air bases in order that communication be maintained with the battalion and neighbouring R/T stations. The out-stations did not have the necessary means of installing their own telephone lines. They were furnished by the airbase commander. Radio links to the battalion were also maintained as a standby.[90]

Liaison with the Army signals

As the external characteristics of Russian radio traffic was not sufficient to identify a group of new traffic as either Red Army or Soviet Air Forces it was necessary to maintain close liaison with the German Army cipher bureau, General der Nachrichtenaufklärung. Of primary importance was liaison between the respective traffic analysis sections and for this purpose Non-commissioned liaison officers were frequently exchanged. During such periods when contact with the Army could not be maintained perhaps due to distances involved, the Luftwaffe Chi-Stelle was still able to identify traffic and execute traffic analysis.[90]

Northern sector

Development up to the Luftwaffe invasion of Russia

In May 1941, Luftflotte 2 and its attached signals units, the 3rd Battalion of the Luftwaffe Signal Regiment was transferred to Warsaw. As the signals unit has no experience in monitoring and intercepting Russian traffic, the majority of the work was undertaken by the fixed station in Warsaw. The committent of the Warsaw station increased again when W-Leit 2 was transferred to Italy in December 1942.[91] To reinforce the Warsaw station, that was not fully prepared, W-Leit 1 in Bernau, seconded approximately one-third of its cryptanalysis and evaluation personnel to the Warsaw station.[91] In the last half of 1944, the work of W-Leit 1 has attained such stature that its reports were forwarded by Referat D to the General Staff virtually unaltered.

Shortly before the beginning of the war with the Soviet Union, the 3rd Battalion of LNR 1 in Bernau moved with the Luftflotte to Königsberg. At the outbreak of World War 2, the battalion was composed of:[91]

  • W-Leit 1
  • Fixed station in Kobbelbude, with several out-stations
  • A small intercept and DF station in Kirkenes

In addition, the Fliegerkorps subordinated to Luftflotte 1 had a signals company that monitored Russian air activity that was of specific interest to the unit. This company, was lacking in experienced personnel, was considered inefficient and to a great extent had to rely upon the support of the battalion. Much later in the war, it was amalgamated into battalion.[92]

These signals units were linked together by wired communications lines, to the Luftflotte that was only a few kilometres distant, the fixed intercept station in Warsaw, the Chi-Stelle station itself and the advanced echelon which had moved to East Prussia.[92]

The order of battle and strength of Russian air units were already known from work done during peace time, with all signals people being alerted during the night of 21 June 1941 as to what they might expect to find in Russian radio traffic. However no change occurred in call signs, frequencies of transmission, codes or ciphers. Nevertheless, there was much chaos and confusion manifested in the great amount of plain text messages that was received, The state of readiness gradually improved, but lasted for several weeks, and can be attributed to the continuous withdrawal of the Russians. Radio traffic was not as plentiful as Chi-Stelle wished, the reason being that satisfactory land lines on the northern sector.[92]

Operations

As Germany advanced into the Soviet Union in July 1941, Luftflotte 1 and W-Leit 1 moved to Dvinsk in Latvia. As it became increasingly evident that personnel and equipment was not sufficient for task at hand, a request to increase the strength of the battalion was submitted, and in the middle of July 1941 and signals company arrived. This company had had previous experience in the East in 1939, and became operational in a few weeks.[93]

After a three-week stay in Dvinsk, the battalion moved in Luftflotte 1 to Ostrov. Another company was created out of existing personnel, such that from August 1942 to December 1942, the battalion consisted of the following units:[93]

  • W-Leit 1
  • Two intercept companies in the direct vicinity of W-Leit 1, together with satellite out-stations and DF units.
  • Fixed intercept station in Kobbelbude.
  • Smaller fixed station in Kirkenes.

A small intercept station in Mikkeli, with two out-stations, one in central Finland, the other on Lake Ladoga.[93] This station was created after the entry of Finland into the war, and lengthened the DF base line.[93]

Use was also made of the Finnish Signals Intelligence Office, Viestitiedustelutoimisto, whose work was considered to be of a high standard within the German cryptography community. The Luftwaffe station in Finland had either wire or radio links with W-Leit 1 in Ostrov. Additional DF equipment was established on the northern sector in order to obtain more favourable DF cuts. Some of these were placed within the area of the central sector.[93]

During the period of transition, by augmenting its personnel in order to meet the increasing demands made upon it, the battalion was able to provided a flawless picture of the Soviet Air Force in the northern sector.[94]

In early 1941, owing to administration difficulties and problems with billets, part of the Luftflotte, including the operations office, and the signals battalion, moved from their location in Ostrov to Riga in Latvia. In Riga, W-Leit 1 was located close to the Luftflotte, while the two intercept companies were positioned to the east of the city.[94]

In autumn 1942, the Luftflotte withdrew to East Prussia, close to Kobbelbude, were the fixed intercept station was located. In February 1945, advancing Soviet troops forced the battalion to withdraw, via land and sea to the island of Rügen. The stations in Finland were closed, and the personnel withdrawn. In January 1945, the battalion returned to Lübeck where it surrendered to the British Army.[94]

Intercept

W/T interception was the most important in the first stages of the war. The area covered extended from the Arctic Sea to a region slightly north of Moscow.[94]

In the autumn of 1942, the battalion started to take an interested in Russian High frequency R/T, as this traffic was becoming more prevalent as the war progressed. Two R/T stations were established on German fighter airfields, one south of Leningrad, the other south-west of Lake Ilmen. This was done primarily to increase the rapidity with which these units received intelligence derived from Russian fighter traffic. However it was found that from 1942 onwards that careful processing of RT traffic afforded valuable information on the strength and order of battle of Russian Air Force.[94]

When the battalion withdrew to East Prussia in June 1944 these two outstations were left behind. A few months later it became necessary to setup still another RT detachment in Courland. Later, the two out-stations left in Russia also withdrew to this area, and continued operations even though Courland was cut off. Part of the personnel of these RT detachments later fell into Russian hands.

The battalion was responsible for covering the traffic of the Russian Baltic Fleet Air Arm. To assist in this task an RT detachment was placed aboard the German cruiser Prinze Eugen. This RT unit followed the activities of the Russian Baltic Fleet aircraft in order to warn German shipping of impending attack. This work assumed even greater importance after Courland had been cut off and was relying mainly on supplies by sea.[95]

With autumn 1944 approaching, RT intercept had far surpassed WT in importance and was supplying 70%-80% percent of the intelligence obtained by the battalion. The Russian 1st, 3rd and 15th Air Armies used RT almost exclusively, which meant that at least one RT out-station had to be allocated to cover each of these air armies. Good communication between these detachments and the battalion were therefore of the essence.[95]

Russian radar stations on the northern sector were located mainly in the Leningrad-Kronstadt-Levansaari area, and later on also along the Baltic coast, especially in the Revel and Kemel areas. Two radar intercept detachments were allocated to the battalions by the Radar Intercept Control Centre in Berlin, and these units monitored Russian radar activity in the Leningrad area from April 1943 to June 1944.[96]

In March 1945, Russian radar stations began to use RT for reporting purposes. During Russian daylight fighter sweeps the fighter control stations were informed of any German fighter reaction as revealed by radar. The signals out-stations monitoring this traffic were able to warn German aircraft of their impending danger.[96]

Evaluation

Signals was a unique and therefore important source of intelligence to the Luftwaffe. Movements of Russian units, occupation of airfields, number of serviceable aircraft, and location of supply dumps were determined from the monitoring of point to point traffic. Russian offensive intentions were also determined from traffic intercepted on these networks. Thus, for example, a Russian order to bomber units was intercepting ordering an attack on Shavli in Lithuania, where an entire German Panzer Army had been immobilised through lack of fuel. The signals reported this to the Luftwaffe, which provided fighters for the intercept of the Russian bombers, while Junkers Ju 52s dropped gasoline containers to the encircled army. Such signals successes occurred from time to time.[96]

With the stabilizing of the northern front the volume of Soviet radio traffic shrank. Nevertheless, a substantial amount of messages still were intercepted daily. Signals was almost the only source of intelligence on the Russian situation, as agent’s reports, and other forms of intelligence were for the most part lacking.[96]

On occasion, the signals battalion furnished intelligence to the Luftwaffe operations which went unheeded, e.g. in the autumn of 1941, when Germany was striving to effect a junction with the Finnish troops at Tikhvin, certain radio characteristics appeared in traffic on this sector that two weeks previously had been noted in traffic from Siberia. This was taken by signals intelligence as an indication that the Russian troops had been transferred in this short interval from Siberia to a sector south of Tichvin.[97] The German command maintained that this was impossible, and did not react to this intelligence. The Russians attacked in great force and won a significant victory. The railway between Leningrad and Moscow was thus liberated by the Russians, and the Germans were forced to take up positions on the Volkhov Front, leaving the hedgehog redoubt of Demyansk to its fate. The junction with the Finns never materialised.[97]

The signals station in Kirkenes which suffered with the Finnish SI station from auroral interference in its radio reception, nevertheless derived satisfactory intelligence from for the German headquarters on the Kurmansk Front, especially that concerning convoys and to and from Archangel. The latter were reported to the bomber units and the navy.[97]

Similarly successful were the Finnish signals stations in monitoring the Finnish Front and the northern sector of the Leningrad Front. The Finnish and German signals worked in closest cooperation.[97]

Liaison

Even before the start of the war, the commanding officer of the battalion had maintained unofficial liaison with the army and navy signals unit. Frequent visits were exchanged which resulted in a reciprocity of intelligence exchange.[97] This liaison became closer as time went on, and all three branches of the Wehrmacht were able to give each other very important intelligence, and avoid unnecessary duplication of work. Naturally close liaison was also currently maintained with the other Luftwaffe signals battalions on the Eastern Front.[98]

Prisoner of War interrogation

Since the signals battalions had a considerable number of Russian speaking interpreters, who knew the Russian mind and its weakness, permission was secured for these interpreters to be present during interrogation of captured Russian pilots and radio operators. As the prisoners had been taught by Russian propaganda to expect the worse possible treatment, considerate handling of them often brought results. Good food, a glass of vodka, and a cigarette soon made then loquacious. The only drawback was that they did not know much, since the Russian policy, in interests of security, was that each man should be given only that information needed to perform his individual job. Since only the formation leaders had radio transmitters, and the navigator of the leading aircraft performed his speciality for the entire formation, the other crew members knew nothing. The radio operator also possessed no knowledge of anything but his radio set. Code and ciphers were held in a safe by an especially appointed officer and only made available to the formation leaders shortly before take-off. By order, radio was to be used as little as possible; navigational aids did not exist. Therefore, relatively little intelligence could be obtained on Russian signal techniques. Prisoner of war statements gave a quite a complete picture of ground organisation, composition of tactical units and so on.[98]

Central sector

Organisation and development

Before the start of the Eastern campaign, the fixed signals stations in Warsaw, W-21 worked on traffic of the Russian Air Force. When war in the east became imminent, W-Leit 2 also was moved to Warsaw with Luftflotte 2 as reinforcement for the expected military operations. Up to the time of the move, W-Leit 2 had worked on British air traffic exclusively. Since it was inexperienced in Russian traffic, the full monitoring burden fell upon W-21 during the first months of the great offensive in the east. Conditions were made very difficult through lack of sufficient personnel and transport, as the campaign was then moving very fast.[99]

W-21 and W-Leit 2 were moved from Warsaw to Minsk and later in October 1941 to Smolensk. In December 1941, Luftflotte 2 and its signals battalions were withdrawn and sent to Italy.[99]

W-21 and the signals company of V Fliegerkorps had to cover all of the central sector Russian air traffic during the severe winter of 1941-1942, under the most difficult conditions. This coverage was performed from Smolensk. Due to difficulties in administrations of the signals company of V Fliegerkorps and W-21, it was decided to combine them and form the Signals Battalion, East. At this time the Fliegerkorps V changed its name to Luftflotte east.[99]

The signals battalion furnished all its intelligence reports to Luftflotte operations, and worked directly under the Chief Signal Officer of the Luftflotte Staff.[99]

In Smolensk there was also a German Army signals regiment. This regiment covered Russian Air Force traffic. The coverage of air traffic by this regiment was even greater than that of the Luftwaffe signals intelligence. Every effort was made by the battalion to rectify this matter, and in course of four months this was accomplished through additional intercept personnel, transfer of the intercept site to an area of better reception, retraining of personnel, and reorganisation of and closer cooperation between the evaluation, deciphering and intercept elements. In September 1942, the army signals ceased monitoring Russian Air Force traffic, and all intelligence reports on the Russian Air Force were handled by the battalion.[100]

The coverage of the battalion increased so rapidly that in a very short time, it was unable to cover all commitments without having again to increase personnel and equipment. These commitments arose from air-to-ground traffic, which up to this time had not been covered. It necessitated the creation of a DF network, RT outstations and a fighter warning service for German long range reconnaissance. The ensuring requests for additional personnel and equipment were granted, in most cases by the Luftflotte in consideration of the importance of the mission and the value attached to signals reports. At this time the battalion compromised two intercept companies and one Evaluation Company. Only one of the companies was fully mobile, the other two had only a minimum of vehicles.[100]

When the bulge in the German line in front of Smolensk was eliminated by the Russians, the battalion together with the now renamed Luftflotte 6 moved to Orsha in August 1943, and two weeks later again moved, this time to Minsk.[101]

In Minsk, the battalion was ideally located in a large school and enjoyed excellent radio reception. The move was made in echelons, and coverage of Russian traffic was carried on during the move. The battalion functioned very smoothly, and took little time to become completely operational at the new location (Fig 4).[101]

During October 1943 in Minsk, the battalion received a fourth company. This intercept company was formerly with a Fliegerkorps on the southern sector, and was fully mobile. The addition of this intercept company enabled the use of fifty-five receivers on Russian WT traffic.[101]

Each of the companies in the battalion had its allotted work. The 1st company was charged with all deciphering and evaluation. The 2nd company was assigned coverage of Russian air force point to point networks. Between 500 and 900 messages were intercepted daily, which were processed by the 1st company and read with 60-70% success. The 3rd company monitored Russian long range bomber traffic. For fighter traffic RT outstations of this company were attached to German fighter units and worked on at the latter's bases. The 4th company monitored the Soviet Air Defence Forces (PVO). This involved WT and RT traffic of the Russian fighter arm defending critical railway junctions and industrial centres. Also monitored were the flak and air raid warning networks, radio beacons, and radar. The RT outstations also warned German long-range reconnaissance aircraft of the approach of Russian fighters. The work in Minsk continued for about 10 months and was considered very successful.[101]

In June 1944, the battalion moved with Luftflotte 6 from Minsk to Warsaw and in August to the vicinity of Łódź. While there, a fifth intercept company was added and the battalion was fully employed for another six months. [ Fig no. 5].[102]

The chain of command of signals battalions, was generally changed several time during the war without attaining a satisfactory solution. Even the final reorganisation into signals regiments, with separate operational and administrative commands over them, did not prove at all successful.[102]

The Fliegerkorps organisation and Luftflotten Ic operation, several times attempted to have the signals units serving them subordinated to them, rather than the signal corps, as these units were their prime source of intelligence. The realisation of such a plan which met with stiff resistance in signal quarters might have had a detrimental effect on the work of signals intelligence, since a not inconsiderable part of this service devoted itself to the interests of combat units rather than to those of the Ic operations. Moreover, a signals battalion with its radio receivers, DF and other signal equipment would have proved too much of a technical problem for Ic.[102]

Signals Intelligence Battalion East grew with increased volume of Russian traffic, but from the very first was always able to solve the intricate problems presented. Lack of caution was in no small way responsible for many problems and the following illustrates the point. A certain German general, in a public interview, told the press that his success in breaking out of an encirclement by Russian troops was directly attributable to knowledge of the disposition of opposing Russian forces, obtained from signal intelligence.[102]

The effect of this interview was directly felt by the Chi-Stelle as such declarations inevitably brought about a complete change of Russian codes and cyphers.Despite these difficulties, signals was able to surmount all problems, owing largely to the fact that from the beginning it had followed Russian forces most closely, and could again pick up the threads, even following such drastic changes.[103]

The battalion was always given the utmost consideration in its equipment and personnel needs, by the Luftflotte. Several times the Luftflotte commander himself came to the assistance of the battalion, owing to his great interest in the work.[103]

Operations
Intercept Cover

It was found that by giving the intercept companies a special area and type of enemy aircraft to work on, they became highly efficient and developed a real spirit of competition that proved most useful in this work.[102]

The following types of traffic were covered:

  • Point-to-point traffic of the Russian air armies. On the central sector there were 25 WT received for the Russian point-to-point networks. 15 search sets were used to locate new and changed frequencies. One receiver was used to cover a small group of rather unimportant networks. This mission was performed by one WT intercept company which did not have its own evaluation section.[102]
  • Point-to-point traffic of the Russian air defence units. This traffic comprised networks of Russian fighter divisions, flak and air raid warning service. There were 10 receivers of another WT company allotted to this task. This company also covered the RT of the Russian defensive fighter arm, and had small detachments of three to four sets, manned by Russian speaking operatives at three air bases used by German long range reconnaissance Groups.[103] In addition, the company covered Russian radar and radio beacons and was equipped to do its own evaluation.
  • Air to ground WT traffic of Russian long range bombers (ADD). Twenty receivers were allotted to this traffic during periods of activity, and an additional 10 receivers were used to cover the point-to-point networks on which operational orders were transmitted. These duties were performed by a third WT Intercept Company, which also had its own evaluation company.[104]
  • Air to ground RT traffic of Russian fighters and fighter bombers. The company that performed this work was prepared to send teams of men and sets to advanced German fighter airfields. These teams, possessing six radio sets and Russian speaking operators, were sent to fighter Gruppen and worked directly with these units. Their reports were also sent to the battalion evaluation company for incorporation in the overall intelligence picture.[104]

The battalion had a total of 120 receivers, with the majority always in operation.

For WT intercept the radio receiver, Type A was used, however there was a shortage of this types, so Type B was also used. Both of these sets were standard Luftwaffe equipment. Type B was not as efficient as the A in that it did not possess selectivity of the latter. For RT intercept, the High frequency C receiver was used. There were a few power orientated K receivers used on this sector, but these sets were not generally liked by the operators. It was found that better results were obtained by letting the operators pick their own type of set to work with, and this was done wherever possible.[104]

Most of the radio sets were indented to be operated with dry cell batteries but for practical reasons these were converted to wet cell battery operation by 100 volt storage batteries taken from vehicles. Two batteries were used for each set, one being charged while the other was being used.[105]

DF Operations

The battalion had five WT DF units, six RT DF units, three MF DF’s, and three radar intercept DF’s. This number was not deemed adequate for the work at hand.[105]

Evaluation
  • Traffic and Log Analysis: DF evaluation
    • These sections, grouped together and headed by an officer analysed WT traffic and call-signs. They also assigned frequencies to be covered by the intercept units.
  • Cryptanalysts
    • The deciphering section was also headed by an officer. It deciphered intercepted messages and developed new cryptanalytic techniques.
  • Contents Evaluation
    • This section analysed the contents of messages and maintained files on all information referring to order of battle, location or airfields, personalities and so on and passed this information on to the final evaluation section.
  • Final Evaluation
    • This section compiled all reports issued by the battalion.[105]
Signal communication

A good communication system is most essential to signals work, in that it provides the means for immediate dissemination of all pertinent information. For security purposes the use of radio must be limited. Excellent wire communication existed from the out-stations to the evaluation company, and from the battalion to command HQ. Each out-station had a teleprinter link with the battalion, as well as a standby radio channel. The battalion was equipped with a large telephone switch board, with trunk service to outstations and command headquarters. The battalion had a number of direct lines, among which were lines to Luftflotte 6, Signal Regiment East, Referat D of the Chi-Stelle and to the nearest Luftwaffe exchange.[106]

The battalion had its own teleprinter installation with both standard and secure teleprinter machines. These were tied in to the Luftwaffe exchange, and to the special signals teleprinter network. The latter network provided communication with the Chi-Stelle, regimental headquarters, and the other two battalions of the regiment.[106]

During raids of t Russian long range bombers, permanent telephone connections were established to the other signals battalions over a distance of 300-500Kilometres which were maintained for the duration of the raid.[106]

A battalion signal officer was appointed to be responsible for the smooth functioning of all signal communication, including the distribution of cipher systems. This was usually the commanding officer of one of the intercept companies, since these companies possessed the greater part of the signal equipment.[106]

A technical inspector of the battalion staff, in conjunction with the radio repair sergeants of the intercept companies, was responsible for all signal maintenance and repair.[107]

General Comments
  • It was found that operations were performed most efficiently when battalion could be centrally located and long lines of communication were not needed to outstations, DF stations and command HQ.[107]
  • battalion moves always adversely affected operations, and it would have been more advantageous to allow the battalion to remain in one location, and provide communication lines and a signals liaison officer to the Ic operations of the Luftflotte, instead of insisting that the battalion be in the immediate vicinity of the Luftflotte.[107]
Liaison
With local signals battalions

Close liaison between battalions was of extreme importance, as intercept cover overlapped. Through proper liaison many important points and valuable information exchanged on new traffic, unallocated stations to listen to and cryptanalytic solutions. The importance of immediate liaison was found e.g. when Russian bombers flew past more than one battalion.[107]

German night fighter units

Cooperation with the Luftwaffe night fighter arm in the central sector provided good results.[108] The signals battalion maintained a liaison officer at the night fighter control centre who received all signal intelligence data related to fixes, course, strength and probably targets of Russian bombers. Considering the paucity of Russian long range bombing missions, the results obtained were quite satisfactory. For example, during a Russian attack on Tilsit that was closely followed by signals, German night fighters were able to shoot down 14 Russian bombers out of 100 that participated in the raid. During their next attack the Russian bombers maintained the strictest radio silence, an indication that they realised the reason for their previous losses.[108]

Long range reconnaissance units

A fighter warning service was maintained, similar to those in the west and south to advice reconnaissance crews of impending attack from Russian fighters. The intelligence source for this service was the prolific Russian fighter R/T traffic, but compared to the fighter warning services in the other two theatres, it was considered rather primitive.[108]

Day fighters

The support of German day fighters was one of the primary functions of signals on the central sector of the Eastern Front. For this reason, a policy of close cooperation was carefully nurtured on both sides. SIS out-stations, commanded by an officer, and attached to fighter Geschwader or Gruppen, unusually maintained their operations room in the same building as the fighter control. By means of direct liaison between the command officer of signals unit and the fighter control chief, all operational matters to which signals might pertain were discussed. Signals served to instruct German fighter pilots on the combat tactics of Russian fighters and fighter bombers.[108]

Luftflotte headquarters

In the east it was particularly difficult for the Ic operations of the Luftflotte to obtain information on the enemy situation. Reliable agents' reports were intermittent and photographic intelligence was seldom accurate, owing to excellent camouflage of which the Russians were masters. Moreover, it was dependent on the weather and towards the end of the war was rendered more difficult by the stiffening of Russian air defense. That the Ic, nevertheless, was able to boast an accurate picture of the enemy situation at all times was the result of the work of signals intelligence. Everything possible was done to further close liaison between the Ic and the signals battalion.[108]

The battalion forwarded one of its most capable junior officers to the office of the Luftflotte Ic as a signals liaison officer. The latter usually had a direct telephone line to the battalion final evaluation section.[108]

To assist evaluation work, the Ic included the signals battalion in the distribution of all daily reports and appreciations prepared by his office. These included:

  • A list of all missions flown by the Luftlotte, including results of the mission.[109]
  • A list of all hostile aircraft plotted by radar and visual observation.
  • Coverage of airfields by photo reconnaissance.
  • Locations of radio stations and radar installations from photo reconnaissance.
  • A report of the ground situation as issued by the Army.
  • Prisoner of War Interrogation reports of Russian air crews.[109]

Russian airborne radio operators were interrogated by the battalion at first hand and all captured documents dealing with Russian signal matters were sent to the battalion. The furnishing of this important collateral intelligence to the signals battalions greatly facilitated its evaluation work. Those situations were obviated where the evaluation section may halt due to a problem that had already been clarified by accurate PW testimony. The analysis of Russian radio traffic, intercepted in conjunction with a German attack, was simplified if exact details concerning the attack was available to the German evaluation company.[109]

All intelligence obtained by the battalion was passed to Ic by the signals liaison officer. At 6:00 pm daily, a secret signals intelligence report was prepared by a specially assigned and trusted evaluator. This report was sent by courier to the Luftflotte where it was available for the Commanding Generals war room conference, which took place each evening. Messages of tactical importance were passed to the Luftflotte as soon as they were obtained.[109] On the basis of these daily reports, aggregate fortnightly report that emphasised long range changes and new developments in the Russian situation during the period. The daily signals reports, together with other intelligence available, formed the basis for an enemy intelligence report prepared by the Ic and distributed to tactical units without revealing the sources of the material. 80% of the contents of this report was derived from signal intelligence.[110]

The daily and fortnightly reports on the battalion were also sent by teleprinter to regimental headquarters and to Referat D of the Chi-Stelle.[110]

Conclusions

Signals intelligence in the east was the prime source of enemy intelligence. Reports of the Russian Air Force units, special concentrations and warnings of impending attacks could always be timely and accurately stated. There were no important Russian attacks that signals did not recognise early enough that preparations could be arranged.[111]

Unit strength, availability of fuel and ammunition, serviceability of airfields and aerodromes as well as impending attacks on railways, bridges, factories and so on, were determined from solved messages. Signals on several occasions was able to predict in advance the time and course of America heavy bomber formations flying over the Russian lines, and also at which fields these units would land, e.g. Poltava.[111]

The work of the RT out-stations with German fighter Geschwader was alone responsible for shooting down over 1000 Russian aircraft in the central sector.[111]

Reconnaissance units often called the battalion by telephone after landing and expressed their thanks for the service rendered by the signals, stating that without this assistance they would have been unable to complete their mission.[111]

During the first period of the war, reports from signals was so radical to High Command that they were initially distrustful of them, and made only the most cautious use of them. Later the situation changed, and came to believe in signals implicitly, and hailed it as the most reliable and opulent source of enemy intelligence.[111]

Southern sector

Organisation and development
Origins in the east

The development of the Luftwaffe signals units in the east began in 1936 with fixed intercept and DF stations which were mainly used by civilian personnel. The first operational territories were Czechoslovakia, Poland and the Soviet Union. Referat D of the Chi-Stelle was in command of signals intelligence in the east.[112]

Development of the southern sector at the start of the invasion of the Soviet Union

After the Anschluss, and the annexation of Austria to the German Reich in 1938, the Heeresnachrichtenamt, the Austrian cipher bureau, was incorporated into the Luftwaffe. Austrian personnel were used mainly at two new stations, W-Leit 4 in Vienna and W-14 in Hirschstetten, Vienna. Stations in Hungary were organised in October 1938 under the cover name of Operation Stephen. In spring 1939, all signals intercept stations were organised as a battalion under command of W-Leit 4. After the forming of the Luftflotte 4 Signal Regiment, the 3rd battalion of the regiment became a signals battalion. At the beginning of the war, the following units comprised the battalion:[112]

  • W-Leit 4, an evaluation company
  • 1 mobile signals company
  • 3 fixed signals intercept stations.

The signals company was reinforced by certain experienced personnel from the fixed signals intercept stations. There was no central training of signals intercept operators. The battalion, therefore, instructed recruits during their training for the special tasks need undertaken. From the newly trained personnel, a second signals company was created in early 1940. Later a signals school for the battalion was established in Premstätten for the training for replacements. Radio operators allotted to the battalion received signals and cryptography training at the unit.[113] The battalion covered the Soviet Union, Czechoslovakia until the invasion, Yugoslavia, Romania, Greece and Turkey. Al these monitoring operations under the aegis of Luftflotte 4 were handled by an intercept company in Constanța. The main points of the observation focused on events that could ensure the success of military operations.[113]

From Czechoslovakia, weather traffic, safety service networks, and some artillery fire-control weather were intercepted. The order of battle of the Czech Air Force and the extent of occupation of their airfields was known. After the occupation of Czechoslovakia, it was found that the Czechoslovakia cipher bureau had solved a Wehrmacht code called German: Kammsschlüssel, and was reading it easily. Consequently followed a greater limitation of the use of Wehrmacht low grade codes.[113]

In Romania, air force traffic and the police networks were monitored. The police code was solved, but the reports contained therein were of no interest.[113] Monitoring of Romania ceased in spring 1941 and was not resumed until the Royal coup occurred that transferred the loyalty of the country to the Allies in 1944.[113]

The monitoring of Turkey was considered a success. Strength and deployment of its air forces were known and its codes read. Turkish RT traffic was also intercepted.[114]

Special attention was paid to the Soviet Union and very early the results of this monitoring gave valuable information to the signals intelligence and pilots of the Luftflotte 4. When the war started, signals on the southern sector was prepared.[114]

Operations
Poland and Balkans
  • Polish Campaign
No change took place to the fixed signals intercept stations. One mobile company and a special detachment of the Chi-Stelle were used in Poland. The results were meagre. The weather and safety service networks revealed little intelligence other than what airfields were being used. Sometimes artillery fire-control traffic was intercepted on WT and RT.[114]
  • Yugoslavia Campaign
The Royal Yugoslav Army Air Force was monitored by two fixed signals intercept stations and one company. The Royal Yugoslav Army Air Force code was known and all traffic could be read during the entire German war effort. As a result of signals, all Yugoslavian operations were known by the Oberkommando der Luftwaffe sufficiently in advance to take counter measures.[114]
  • Greek Campaign
One fixed signals intercept station, one company, and one signals company of the Fliegerkorps III monitored Greece. The Hellenic Air Force codes were known and operations were successfully covered.[115]
Soviet Union

At the beginning of the campaign, the mission of the battalion was to monitor the Soviet Air Force in the area of Luftflotte 4. The following signals units were used:

  • W-Leit 4
  • 4 signals companies
  • one fixed signals intercept station.

The battalion also had operational control of the signal companies of the Fliegerkorps. The request of Luftwaffe signals intelligence to incorporate those Fliegerkorps companies into the signals battalions was met by the strongest resistance on the part of the Fliegerkorps and did not materialise on the southern sector, until the end of 1944. The fact that the signals intelligence had operation control of the Fliegerkorps signal companies, but was not aware of their movements when the Fliegerkorps unit moved, caused considerable difficulties.[115]

At the beginning of the war, the battalion had 90 WT receivers in operation, which were considered sufficient. The geographical dispersion of the companies of the battalion made centralised control very difficult. For this reason all mobile companies of the battalion were concentrated in Nikolayev in September 1941, and remained with Luftflotte 4, and from there, in turn in the same year to Kislovodsk. Due to the impracticability of administering the companies located near Rzeszów and Constanța due to the distance involved, they were transferred to the Chi-Stelle battalion. During the German retreat, the battalion moved back to Mariupol in January 1943; a month later it moved to Kryvyi Rih, and in April 1943 to Kamianske to ensure better communication with the Luftflotte. By autumn 1943, it was moved back to Nikolayev.[116]

The signals battalion of Luftflotte Don that had been activated in autumn 1942 was dissolved in December 1943. One of its companies was temporarily attached to the signals battalion of Luftflotte 4. By February 1944, the battalion had reached Odessa, but enemy attacks required a further move to Bacău. Communication difficulties prompted another move from Hungary to Debrecen, Turkey in April 1944. Two signal companies of the Fliegerkorps, and the old company in Constanța, were returned to the battalion in the summer of 1944. Frequent air attacks forced the battalion to retreat to Horn, Austria. One company was left with the Luftflotte. This was done to assure immediate intelligence to the Luftflotte so that it could undertake prompt countermeasures as required. Had the company moved with the battalion, this service would not have been available on the timely manner required, as communication over long distances was difficult and frequently disrupted.[116] At the end of April the battalion moved to Münzkirchen. The last move was to Tauplitz on 4 May 1945, where operations ceased at 1200 hours on 8 May 1945.[117]

Operational details
  • Interception
The monitoring of fixed frequency bands at first allocated to each receiver proved impractical and was very soon abandoned. Thereafter each technician was given a specific network to cover. This enabled the technician to recognise a network by the characteristic tone of the enemy transmission, and fist of the operator[118], even though the frequencies and call signs had been changed. This considerably facilitated the work of the traffic analysis section. Search receivers were operated over certain frequency bands. The monitoring of radio beacons and long range bomber formations was done with receivers assigned especially for this work.[117]
  • Direction Finding
At the beginning of the war with Russia, there already existed a fixed DF network, which soon proved inadequate and had to be replaced. By the use of mobile Adcock (A-70F Elektrola) which could be moved according to requirements, a good DF baseline was speedily established.[117]
In order that this network operated smoothly, a system of control had to be devised. In the beginning, every DF unit worked independently, being assigned targets by the nearest intercept station. This resulted in line bearings only being taken, in consequence, definite fixes were very rare. It was soon found that centralised control of the DF units had to be brought about in order to achieve better results. Radio communication was established to the DF stations, since wire communication was technically impossible.[117] The battalion assigned targets to DF outstations, which reported the bearings back to the battalion. Despite some successes, these DF control procedures were not up to the standard required. The battalion later worked out a new DF control procedure, which later came to be used over the whole Eastern Front. Targets averaged approximately 300 per day, resulting in about 80 useful fixes. The DF control procedure proved especially useful in DF-ing approaching enemy flight formations.[119]
In the autumn 1944, the DF outstations received an additional Adcock each. The use of two DF's in each unit had the following advantages:
  • A greater degree of accuracy.
  • Point-to-point and air-to-ground traffic could be covered at the same time.
  • One DF unit could work at all times despite frequent moves.
The DF-ing of Radio Telephone traffic was done at first by High Frequency close-range DF kit of Czech manufacture, and by the German PN 57N, neither of which were successful. Later on, Adcock installations were satisfactory used in RT DF-ing. The RT DF stations were manned by personnel from the signals companies of the Fliegerkorps. The RT intercept stations of the battalion were also equipped with Adcocks. Speedy operation was particularly essential because of the brevity of enemy fighter and fighter bomber missions. Transmissions of DF results by WT was too slow. Telephone communications between outstations became necessary, and it was established by the Fliegerkorps or Luftwaffe.[119]
The battalion had no medium frequency DF units. The safety service DF detachments of the Luftflotte provided any necessary bearings on Soviet radio beacons.[119] Requests for bearings were transmitted on WT to the individual DF detachments by the safety service control. Non-commissioned officers, on detachment service from the battalion, directed the DF network, and performed the evaluation of the results.[119]
  • RT Interception
RT interception on the southern sector of the Eastern Front was not intensively pursued until the spring of 1943. Previous intercept attempts against the Russian Air Force met only slight success in contrast to the northern, re: Saint Petersburg (then Leningrad) and central Moscow sectors, where large volumes of R/T traffic, air-to-air and air-to-ground, permitted successful operation. Russian fighter and fighter bomber formations in the south were poorly equipped, and in the beginning many missions were flown without any radio equipment.[120]
Luftwaffe RT intercept out-stations on the Crimean peninsula, and the Caucasus had only insignificant success. Russian ground forces used RT, and this traffic was monitored by the intercept companies of the German Army. Only upon request of High Command did the signal units of the Luftwaffe monitor Russian Army RT, e.g. during the Kerch Offensive. The first fighter units of the Russian Air Force to use RT to a considerable extent operated over the Kuban bridgehead in May 1943. These aircraft were fitted with transmitters and significant air to ground and air to air traffic was intercepted, and it was here that the southern sector intercept units had their first real success. The outstations were located on the airfields of fighter units. The strength of the outstations varied, as a minimum, four receivers were employed. Evaluation was undertaken in the fighter control centre and findings immediately passed to the duty officer, and provided tactical and sometime strategic intelligence. Traffic data were compiled for weeks in advance and given to the outstations.[120]
  • Radar Interception
Radar interception started in the summer of 1943, as the enemy's intention to increase his use of radar was anticipated. Successes were insignificant as the Russians had not kept pace with the development of radar. Some installations were plotted however. In some Russian traffic, radar installations were referred to as Americans. It was arranged that additional radar intercept coverage was to begin in July 1944 from Romanian territory. The collapse of Romania prevented this, and the installation was destroyed during the German retreat.[121]
  • Traffic Analysis
The operation of the intercept receivers was directed by the traffic analysis section. Close cooperation was necessary between the intercept operator and the traffic analyst. The assistance of the operators in reconstructing and diagramming enemy networks was very successful. Such work encouraged the operators to take an active interest and it also helped the analysts. The tasks of the traffic analysis section were:[121]
  • To record the radio characteristics of the individual Russian air armies.
  • The identification of radio networks.
  • The identification of call signs, radio beacons and the reconstruction of call sign lists.[121]
  • Cryptanalysis
Cryptanalysis was centralised, and was performed at the battalion HQ, except in the case of the signals companies of the Fliegerkorps and special independent signal detachments, which had a small cryptanalyst sections of their own.[121] This section at battalion headquarters comprised of 50 to 60 people.[122] All codes with the exception of 5-figure codes could be deciphered, if sufficient depth of traffic was available. A great number of codes were used on the southern sector of the Eastern Front, and were mostly based on a code, reciphered with a simple substitution cipher. During the campaign, the difficulties in solving these codes were aggravated by the use of variants, unstereotyped messages, and various types of recypherment.
Regarding cryptanalysis of Soviet ciphers in the southern sector, radio traffic taken as a whole, the influence of the Russian signal officers was keenly felt. Well disciplined radio operators, complicated codes and cleverly conceived procedure signals characterised a good signal officer, as was demonstrated by the 5th Air Army and [17th Air Army]]. Complicated codes made it difficult even for the Soviets, resulting in frequent requests for servicing of messages, involving repetitions and recyphering of the same message in different systems. All this facilitate cryptanalytic work. In the southern sector, old codes were sometime reintroduced with a new recipherment system. It was not possible to recognise such codes immediately. Only by breaking the recipherment and reconstructing the code was the old code visible. Machine ciphers occasionally appeared on the southern sector, but owing to the small depth of traffic, were not analysed.[122]
  • Prisoner of War interrogation and captured documents
Testimony of prisoners were not used as a basis, but only as a confirmation of signal reports. A NCO liaison officer worked with the PW interrogation section of Luftflotte 4 to screen all material of value to signals intelligence.[122] Prisoners of special interest, specifically radio operators were sent directly to the battalion headquarters by Luftwaffe intelligence. Captured crews were interrogated in some cases by personnel of the RT outstations, in order to obtain the promptest possible information on signal frequencies and call signs. Captured aircraft were of particular interest to the signals intelligence. Standing orders of the Luftflotte headquarters required all units to examine captured enemy aircraft for Signal Operation Instructions, and to forward them to the nearest signals outstation. Notebooks on crew members often contained important signal and code data which were not supposed to be on the flight. The aircraft transceiver were especially interesting as they often contained a list of frequencies on their face plate.[123]

Technical operations in the east

Introduction

Within the Luftwaffe Chi-Stelle the principles and procedures underlying traffic evaluation did not differ materially as between the West, South and East. There was no difference in operational principles between West, South and East Luftwaffe signals agencies.[124]

Personnel

The following types of specialist personnel were employed by the signal battalions on the Eastern front.[124]

  • Final evaluators. These specialists worked for short periods in the operations office of the Luftflotten, where they were able to gain appreciation of signals intelligence in relation to other forms of intelligence, as well as to complement their knowledge of the enemy situation in general.[124]
  • Specialists. These were personnel of various Soviet Army theatres, e.g. 1st White Russian Front, 3rd Ukrainian Front.[124]
  • Language translators.[124]
  • Liaison officers. These were specialists from the Chi-Stelle and the Weather Service.[124]
  • Specialists on form messages. These specialists dealt with stereotyped messages containing warning reports, status of equipment, airfield serviceability.[125]
  • Card Index clerks
  • Typists and Clerks
  • Draftsmen

Records

Statistical material contained in a card index file was a critical aid to evaluation. This file contained all the information known of Soviet forces, and included the number of their units, and their organisation, their record in the war to date, location of airfields and other salient details, and names of important personalities. Naturally these records were guarded very carefully and safely stored during bombing or other perilous situations.[124]

  • Air Force Index.
This was the most important file of the evaluation section. It listed all known units of the Soviet air forces, with a separate card for each unit. All data, such as assignment, strength, equipment, movements were entered with date, and reference to the traffic from which the information was obtained. Information not originating with the Chi-Stelle, e.g. Prisoner of war, interrogations, agents' reports, was entered in distinctive colour.[125]
  • Name Index
This file contained all names appearing in connection with the various Soviet air force units.[125] The Soviet habit of signing all radio messages with the name of the commanding officer, and the frequent use of the names of pilots and ground officers resulted in a voluminous card index.[126] It was the most important means of identifications of Call signs and units. It did not matter how often call-signs were changed, as the use of individual names in messages were always present, units could easily be identified. The soviets recognised the danger of this procedure comparatively late, when cover-names and unit numbers were finally adopted. However, this rule wasn’t fully compromised, so valuable sources on information still remained.[126]
  • Airfield Index
This file contained a list of all Soviet airfields known, with a description of size, length of runway, number of revetments, and strength of flak units. After an airfield had been covered by photo reconnaissance, a target number. Assigned by the Luftflotte, was entered on its card.[126]

Analysis and Evaluation of Special Traffic

Soviet Grid Systems

All messages in which names of localities were given in grid reference were handled by a grid specialist.[126]

Soviet grid references were usually expressed by a 6-figure group with a letter frequently added. The reference was often used to inform Soviet air units of the bomb line. Since the operational sectors of the individual soviet units were known, and since the Soviet and German front lines were both the same, an entry into the grid system was easily accomplished.[127] The breaking of the map code was further facilitated by the fact that the soviets, in order to specify a location exactly, often put the first, or the first and last name at the end of the figure group e.g. Mykolaiv 412312N, Tarnov 52394Tv.[126] Another point of entry into breaking these grid references was that in the case of a string of encoded locations a reference to terrain elevation was usually left uncoded.[127]

The two most prevalent grid systems were:

  • Enciphered longitudinal and latitudinal references, used in connection with small-scale maps and valid for the entire Eastern Front.[127]

The first system was used by the Soviet Air Raid Warning Service, and by the long range bombers, while the second was used by the tactical aviation units, and had many variations.[128]

Fig No 1. Soviet Grid System during World War II

The following is an example of the Air Raid Warning System; the entire map was divided into large, small and smaller squares. A large square consisting of 1 degree of longitude and 0.5 degrees of latitude. Longitude and latitude references were expressed in a code, which usually changed monthly. A large square was divided into nine small squares, while they in turn were subdivided into four smallest squares. A single digit was used to designate the small and smallest squares. These numbers for the squares remained constant and ran clockwise, beginning in the upper left hand corner. Longitude and latitude references of the large square expressed by the coordinated of its upper and left hand corner. Thus as show in [Figure no 1], the encoded references for the city of Poltava would be 465262.[127]

The Gauss-Krüger system was a design for a much smaller grid, the primary difference being that the dimensions of the largest squares were selected arbitrarily by the individual units using the system.[127] From the Chi-Stelle standpoint, the size of these squares could be determined only through experience.[128] The system of numbering the small and smallest squares was the same.[128]

The method of encoding the coordinates used to designate a large square varied with each Soviet air army, and often with units within the air army. Further difficulties for the agency were exposed by the fact that the coded equivalents for longitude and latitude did not always run regularly from west to east and north to south, but occasionally in the opposite order; also some units might choose to use all even numbers, while other units chosen odd numbers.[128]

In some systems the large squares were not encoded by number, but with a code name, e.g. lipa for Linden tree, and the encoded reference wouldn’t read as 425391 but lipa 91.[128]

In another grid system, longitude was expressed by a double 2 digit number, and latitude by three. The next reference referred to the smallest square, the small square being omitted, thus, this system still resulted in a 6-digit reference. This grid was used only in conjunction with large-scale maps.[128]

Prearranged Form Messages

Soviet pre-arranged form messages were handled by an individual specialist belonging to the evaluation company. Some messages had the characteristics, in which they differed from other types of traffic:

  • They contained in the clear, the words pervoe (firstly) Vtoroe (secondly) tretie (thirdly) and so on in numerical ascendancy, indicating the type of report being rendered.
  • They contained numbers in consecutive order, which indicated the subject of which was rendered.[129]
  • These were followed by groups of irregular numbers, which indicated the strength of personnel, weight or quantity of equipment.[129]

The following is an example of a typical prearranged form message.

Pre-arranged Form Messages
Message pervoe 03 835
Meaning On hand High octane fuel 835 Kilos
Message 04 1620 05 000
Meaning Motor fuel 1620 Kilos Oil 0 Kilos
Message 06 11350 07 4800
Meaning M/G ammo 11350 rounds A/C ammo 4800 Rounds
Message vtoroe 03 1560
Meaning Required High octane fuel 1560 Kilos
Message 04 730 05 200
Meaning Motor fuel 730 Kilos Oil 200 Kilos
Message 06 11500 07 2300
Meaning M/G ammo 11500 rounds A/C ammo 23000 Rounds

Daily reports of this type indicating stocks of rations, ammunition and fuel, condition of airfields, changes in personnel strength, were made by subordinate units to the senior HQ’s.[129]

Prearranged form messages of combat aviation units contained, for the most part, details as to strength, location, operational status of aircraft and crews[129] and seldom gave any information as to operations, duration of flights or losses. Any grid locations mentioned in such messages were encoded. The following is an example of such a message:[130]

Pre-arranged Form Messages for Aviation Combat Units
Message 01 195 02
Meaning regiment 195 location
Message 524313 03 31
Meaning Ivanovka aircraft 31
Message 365 04 25
Meaning type IL-2 serviceable 25
Message 05 6 07 34
Meaning unserviceable 6 pilots 34
Message 08 37
Meaning aerial gunners 37

In addition to their valuable contents, these messages were an important aid to the identification of call signs and networks.[130] Even when call signs were changed daily, a Soviet unit was easily identified through this information as to members of aircraft and crews, and quantities of oil, fuel, ammunition, which were given in the clear. Since the form of these messages usually remained constant for seven to fourteen days, it was necessary to refer to a similar message of the previous day in order to recognise the unit, and therewith to re-identify the call sign.[130]

Daily summaries and operations reports of combat aviation units were also reported by pre-arranged form messages. Numbers in these messages were encoded, but in such a simple form, however, that speedy analysis was possible.[130] The digits 0 to 9 were enciphered by 3-digit numbers from a prescribed group of 100 numbers.[131] For example, 812=1, 816=2, 831=3,854=4 and so on. The various types of aircraft were encoded with other 3-digit numbers from another group of 100 numbers. For example, LA=507, IL-2=513, IL-4=514, A-20=515, Liberator=524, JU=532. Designations of types of units, e.g. fighter aircraft, fighter-bomber, were encoded within another one hundred number group. The code numbers were changed frequently, but the order of meanings within each hundred member groups remained constant. It was therefore usually sufficient to identify one meaning only in order to re-establish the whole sequence of meanings within a hundred number group.[131]

This system was also used by Soviet long range bomber groups in their strength reports, and by the Soviet Air Raid Warning Service. It was valid for the whole of the eastern front, and therefore of the greatest importance to all the Chi-Stelle battalions which competed with each other in an attempt to be the first to break a new addition of this code.[131]

Weather Messages

Encoded weather messages were given directly to the weather liaison officer. These could be easily identified by their indicator, by the random use of the letter X within the text of the message, and by the absence of message numbers and delivery groups. Weather messages in sent in clear text, were quite frequent at the beginning of the war but became rarer in later on. These were translated into German before they were forwarded to the liaison officer.[131]

The weather liaison officer deciphered messages by means of a deciphering table which was broadcast every six hours from the office of the Chief of the Luftwaffe Weather Service.[131] Weather messages were of assistance in identifying the geographical origin of other traffic intercepted on the same networks, as the weather intercepts often mentioned meteorological stations together with their locations.[132]

Liaison


TICOM

  • TICOM IF-189 GAF Signals Intelligence in the War.
  • Forster, Colonel Hans; Feichtner, Major Ferdinand; Scheuerle, Leutnant Erwin; Jerin, Feldwebel Karl (24 June 1945). "Seabourne Report, Vol. VI. "Origins of the Luftwaffe SIS and History of its Operations in the West. Part 1". Google drive. TICOM. Retrieved 23 August 2017.
  • Forster, Colonel Hans; Feichtner, Major Ferdinand; Scheuerle, Leutnant Erwin; Jerin, Feldwebel Karl (24 June 1945). "Seabourne Report, Vol. VI. "Origins of the Luftwaffe SIS and History of its Operations in the West. Part 2". Google drive. TICOM. Retrieved 23 August 2017.


References

Citations

  1. 1 2 TICOM Volume 5, p. 23
  2. 1 2 IF-180 Seabourne Report, p. 5
  3. R. A. Ratcliff (14 August 2006). Delusions of Intelligence: Enigma, Ultra, and the End of Secure Ciphers. Cambridge University Press. p. 53. ISBN 978-0-521-85522-8. Retrieved 4 August 2017.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I-13 Section II
  5. IF-181 p. 16
  6. IF-181, p. 11
  7. IF-181, p. 14
  8. IF-181, p. 14
  9. 1 2 IF-181, p. 15
  10. IF-189, 403, p.2
  11. 1 2 Volume 5, p. 9
  12. IF-180, p. 2
  13. IF-189, 403, p. 3
  14. I-180, p. 2
  15. I-180, p. 2
  16. Volume 5, p. 10
  17. IF-181, p. 16
  18. IF-189, 403, p.4
  19. IF-181, p.16
  20. IF-180, p.2
  21. IF-181, p.17
  22. 1 2 3 IF-180, p.4
  23. I-180 p.2
  24. IF-180 p.3
  25. IF-180 p.5
  26. 1 2 IF-180 p.6
  27. IF-180 p.7
  28. IF-180 p.8
  29. 1 2 IF-180 p.9
  30. IF-180 p.10
  31. IF-180 p.10
  32. IF-180 p.11
  33. IF-180 p.11
  34. If-180 p.12
  35. If-180 p.13
  36. IF-180 pp. 13-14
  37. IF-180 p.14
  38. IF-180 p.15
  39. IF-180 p.15
  40. IF-180 pp.15-16
  41. 1 2 3 IF-180 pp.16
  42. 1 2 3 IF-180 pp.17
  43. 1 2 3 IF-180 pp.18
  44. 1 2 3 IF-180 pp.19
  45. IF-179, part 2, p. 27
  46. IF-180 p.21
  47. IF-180 p.21
  48. IF-180 p.21
  49. IF-180 p.21
  50. IF-180 p.21
  51. IF-180 p.22
  52. 1 2 3 Volume 5, p.12
  53. IF-180 p.22
  54. IF-180 p.23
  55. IF-180 p.23
  56. IF-180 p.23
  57. IF-180 p.23
  58. IF-180 p.24
  59. IF-180, p.24
  60. IF-180, p.24
  61. IF-180, p.24
  62. IF-180, p.25
  63. IF-180, p.25
  64. IF-180, p.25
  65. 1 2 IF-180, p.26
  66. 1 2 3 4 IF-180, p.27
  67. IF-180, p.28
  68. IF-180, p.28
  69. 1 2 3 4 5 IF-180, p.29
  70. 1 2 3 4 IF-180, p.30
  71. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IF-180, p.31
  72. 1 2 3 4 5 6 IF-180, p.32
  73. 1 2 3 4 IF-180, p.33
  74. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IF-180, p.33
  75. 1 2 3 IF-180 p.35
  76. 1 2 3 4 5 IF-180 p.36
  77. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IF-180 p.37
  78. 1 2 3 4 5 6 IF-180 p.38
  79. 1 2 IF-180 p.39
  80. IF-184 p.1
  81. 1 2 IF-186 p.1
  82. 1 2 3 4 IF-186 p.2
  83. 1 2 3 4 IF-186 p.3
  84. 1 2 3 4 IF-186 p.4
  85. 1 2 3 4 5 IF-186 p.5
  86. 1 2 3 4 5 IF-186 p.6
  87. 1 2 3 4 IF-186 p.7
  88. 1 2 3 4 5 IF-186 p.8
  89. 1 2 3 4 IF-186 p.10
  90. 1 2 3 IF-186 p.10
  91. 1 2 3 IF-186 p.11
  92. 1 2 3 IF-186 p.12
  93. 1 2 3 4 5 IF-186 p.13
  94. 1 2 3 4 5 IF-186 p.14
  95. 1 2 IF-186 p.15
  96. 1 2 3 4 IF-186 p.16
  97. 1 2 3 4 5 IF-186 p.17
  98. 1 2 IF-186 p.18
  99. 1 2 3 4 IF-186 p.19
  100. 1 2 IF-186 p.20
  101. 1 2 3 4 IF-186 p.21
  102. 1 2 3 4 5 6 IF-186 p.22
  103. 1 2 3 IF-186 p.23
  104. 1 2 3 IF-186 p.24
  105. 1 2 3 IF-186 p.25
  106. 1 2 3 4 IF-186 p.26
  107. 1 2 3 4 IF-186 p.27
  108. 1 2 3 4 5 6 IF-186 p.28
  109. 1 2 3 4 IF-186 p.29
  110. 1 2 IF-186 p.30
  111. 1 2 3 4 5 IF-186 p.31
  112. 1 2 IF-186 p.33
  113. 1 2 3 4 5 IF-186 p.34
  114. 1 2 3 4 IF-186 p.35
  115. 1 2 IF-186 p.36
  116. 1 2 IF-186 p.37
  117. 1 2 3 4 IF-186 p.38
  118. Jean-François Blanchette (27 April 2012). "Cryptography is a Material and Embodied Activity". Burdens of Proof: Cryptographic Culture and Evidence Law in the Age of Electronic Documents. MIT Press. pp. 37–40. ISBN 978-0-262-30080-3. Retrieved 28 September 2018.
  119. 1 2 3 4 IF-186 p.39
  120. 1 2 IF-186 p.40
  121. 1 2 3 4 IF-186 p.41
  122. 1 2 3 IF-186 p.42
  123. IF-186 p.43
  124. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IF-187 p.1
  125. 1 2 3 IF-187 p.2
  126. 1 2 3 4 5 IF-187 p.3
  127. 1 2 3 4 5 6 IF-187 p.4
  128. 1 2 3 4 5 6 IF-187 p.5
  129. 1 2 3 4 IF-187 p.6
  130. 1 2 3 4 IF-187 p.7
  131. 1 2 3 4 5 IF-187 p.8
  132. IF-187 p.9

Bibliography

  • "Volume 5 - The German Air Force Signal Intelligence Service" (PDF). NSA. Retrieved 9 June 2017. This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
  • "IF-180 SEABOURNE Report:The Signal Intelligence Service of the German Luftwaffe - Volume V Chi-Stelle" (pdf). Google drive. TICOM. Retrieved 9 July 2017. This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
  • "IF-181 Seabourne Report, Vol. VI. "Origins of the Luftwaffe SIS and History of its Operations in the West. Part 1"" (pdf). Google drive. TICOM. Retrieved 4 August 2017. This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
  • "IF-181 Seabourne Report, Vol. VI. "Origins of the Luftwaffe SIS and History of its Operations in the West. Part 2"" (pdf). Google drive. TICOM. Retrieved 4 August 2017. This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
  • "I-13 Composite Report on Two Interrogations of Oberstlt. Friedrich, Chief of the G.A.F. Sigint Service, 18/5/45 and 9/6/45". Google drive. TICOM. 6 June 1945. Retrieved 24 November 2017. This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
  • "IF-187 Seabourne Report, Vol. XII. "Technical Operations in the East, Luftwaffe SIS" (pdf). Google drive. Ninth Airforce. 24 November 1945. Retrieved 31 July 2018.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.