SpaceX Raptor

The SpaceX Raptor is a full-flow, staged-combustion, methane-fueled rocket engine manufactured by SpaceX. The engine is powered by cryogenic liquid methane and liquid oxygen (LOX), rather than the RP-1 kerosene and LOX used in SpaceX's prior Merlin and Kestrel rocket engines. The earliest concepts for Raptor considered liquid hydrogen (LH
2) as fuel rather than methane.[9] The Raptor engine has about two times the thrust of the Merlin 1D engine that powers the current Falcon 9 launch vehicle.

SpaceX Raptor
Raptor at SpaceX Hawthorne facility
Country of originUnited States
ManufacturerSpaceX
ApplicationMultistage propulsion
StatusReady
Liquid-fuel engine
PropellantLiquid oxygen / liquid methane
Mixture ratio3.54[1] or 3.8[2]
CycleFull-flow staged combustion
Pumps2 × multi-stage
Configuration
Chamber1
Nozzle ratio40
Performance
Thrust2,000 kN (440,000 lbf)[3]
Thrust-to-weight ratio>170 (goal) [4]
Chamber pressure300 bar (30 MPa; 4,400 psi),
  [5][6]
Isp (vac.)380 s (3,700 m/s) (goal)[5]
Isp (SL)330 s (3,200 m/s)[5]
Dimensions
Length3.1 m (10 ft)[7]
Diameter1.3 m (4 ft 3 in)[8]
Dry weight1,500 kg (3,300 lb) (goal)[4]
Used in
Starship

Raptor will be used in both stages of the two-stage-to-orbit, super heavy-lift launch vehicle Starship.[10]

The Raptor engine is a highly reusable methalox staged-combustion engine that will power the next generation of SpaceX launch vehicles designed to replace all existing SpaceX vehicles, including the Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy launch vehicles and the Dragon 2.[11] Raptor engines are expected to be used in various applications, including existing Earth-orbit satellite delivery market, the exploration and colonization of Mars.[12]

Raptor engines began flight testing on the Starhopper in July 2019 and became the first full-flow staged-combustion rocket engine ever flown.[13]

Description
Raptor engine combustion scheme
Full-flow staged-combustion rocket engine

The Raptor engine is powered by subcooled liquid methane and subcooled liquid oxygen using a more efficient staged combustion cycle, a departure from the simpler "open-cycle" gas generator system and lox/kerosene propellants that current Merlin engines use.[14] The RS-25, with hydrolox propellant also used a staged combustion process,[15] as do several Russian rocket engines, including the RD-180[14] and the 25.74 MPa (3,733 psi) chamber pressure RD-191.[16] The stated design size for the Raptor engine varied widely during 2012–2017 as detailed design continued, from a high target of 8,200 kN (1,800,000 lbf) of vacuum thrust[17] to a more recent, much lower target of 1,900 kN (430,000 lbf). In its 2017 iteration, the operational engine is expected to have a vacuum Isp = 382 s (3,750 m/s) and a sea-level Isp = 334 s (3,280 m/s).[18]

The Raptor engine is designed for the use of deep cryogenic methalox propellants—fluids cooled to near their freezing points, rather than nearer their boiling points, which is more typical for cryogenic rocket engines.[19] The use of subcooled propellants increases propellant density to allow more propellant mass in tanks; the engine performance is also improved with subcooled propellants. Specific impulse is increased, and the risk of cavitation at inputs to the turbopumps is reduced due to the higher mass flow rate per unit power generated.[16] Engine ignition for all Raptor engines, both on the pad and in the air, will be by spark ignition, which will eliminate the pyrophoric mixture of triethylaluminum-triethylborane (TEA-TEB) used for engine ignition on the Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy.[16]

Raptor has been claimed to be able to deliver "long life ... and more benign turbine environments".[20][16] Specifically, Raptor utilizes a full-flow staged combustion cycle, where all the oxidizer—with a low-fuel ratio—will power the oxygen turbine pump, and all the fuel—with a low-oxygen ratio—will power the methane turbine pump. Both streams—oxidizer and fuel—will be mixed completely in the gas phase before they enter the combustion chamber. Prior to 2014, only two full-flow staged-combustion rocket engines had ever progressed sufficiently to be tested on test stands: the Soviet RD-270 project in the 1960s and the Aerojet Rocketdyne Integrated Powerhead Demonstrator in the mid-2000s.[21][16][22]

Additional characteristics of the full-flow design, projected to further increase performance or reliability include:[22]

  • eliminating the fuel–oxidizer turbine interseal, which is a potential point of failure in more traditional engine designs;
  • lower pressures are required through the pumping system, increasing life span and further reducing risk of catastrophic failure;
  • ability to increase the combustion-chamber pressure, thereby either increasing overall performance or "by using cooler gases, providing the same performance as a standard staged combustion engine but with much less stress on materials, thus significantly reducing material fatigue or [engine] weight".

SpaceX aims at a lifetime of 1000 flights for Raptor.[23]

The turbopump and many of the critical parts of the injectors for the initial engine development testing were, as of 2015, manufactured by using 3D printing, which increases the speed of development and iterative testing.[19] The 2016 1 MN (220,000 lbf) test-stand engine had 40% (by mass) of its parts manufactured by 3D printing.[16]

The Raptor engine uses a large number of coaxial swirl injectors[24] to admit propellants to the combustion chamber, rather than pintle injectors used on the previous Merlin rocket engines that SpaceX mass-produced for its Falcon family of launch vehicles.[25] Raptor uses "dual redundant torch igniters".[26]

History

The engine development from 2009 to 2015 was funded exclusively through private investment by SpaceX, and not as a result of any funding from the US government.[20][27] In January 2016, SpaceX did agree with the US Air Force to take US$33.6 million in defense department funding in order to develop a particular Raptor model: a prototype of a new upper-stage variant of the Raptor engine designed for potential use as an upper stage on Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy, with SpaceX agreeing to fund at least US$67.3 million on the same upper-stage development project, on a minimum 2:1 private-to-government funding basis.[28][29]

Initial concept

An advanced rocket engine design project named Raptor—then a hydrolox engine—was first publicly discussed by SpaceX's Max Vozoff at the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Commercial Crew/Cargo symposium in 2009.[30] As of April 2011, SpaceX had a small number of staff working on the Raptor upper-stage engine, then still a LH
2/LOX concept, at a low level of priority.[31] Further mention of the development program occurred in 2011.[32] In March 2012, news accounts asserted that the Raptor upper-stage engine development program was underway, but that details were not being publicly released.[33]

In October 2012, SpaceX publicly announced concept work on a rocket engine that would be "several times as powerful as the Merlin 1 series of engines, and won't use Merlin's RP-1 fuel", but declined to specify which fuel would be used.[34] They indicated that details on a new SpaceX rocket would be forthcoming in "one to three years" and that the large engine was intended for the next-generation launch vehicle using multiple of these large engines, that would be expected to launch payload masses of the order of 150 to 200 tonnes (150,000 to 200,000 kg; 330,000 to 440,000 lb) to low Earth orbit, exceeding the payload mass capability of the NASA Space Launch System.[34]

Methane engine announcement and component development

In November 2012, Musk announced a new direction for the propulsion division of SpaceX: developing methane-fueled rocket engines.[35] He further indicated that the engine concept, codenamed Raptor, would now become a methane-based design,[35] and that methane would be the fuel of choice for SpaceX's plans for Mars colonization.[22]

Potential sources and sinks of methane (CH4) on Mars

Because of the presence of water underground and carbon dioxide in the atmosphere of Mars, methane, a simple hydrocarbon, can easily be synthesized on Mars using the Sabatier reaction.[36] In-situ resource production on Mars has been examined by NASA and found to be viable for oxygen, water, and methane production.[37] According to a study published by researchers from the Colorado School of Mines, in-situ resource utilization such as methane from Mars makes space missions more feasible technically and economically and enables reusability.[38]

When first mentioned by SpaceX in 2009, the term "Raptor" was applied exclusively to an upper-stage engine concept[30]—and 2012 pronouncements indicated that it was then still a concept for an upper stage engine[14]—but in early 2014 SpaceX confirmed that Raptor would be used both on a new second stage, as well as for the large (then, nominally a 10-meter-diameter) core of the Mars Colonial Transporter[22] (subsequently, in 2016, on both stages of the Interplanetary Transport System[39] and then, in 2017 on the Big Falcon Rocket).[40]

The earliest public hints that a staged-combustion methane engine was under consideration at SpaceX were given in May 2011 when SpaceX asked if the Air Force was interested in a methane-fueled engine as an option to compete with the mainline kerosene-fueled engine that had been requested in the USAF Reusable Booster System High Thrust Main Engine solicitation.[22]

Public information released in November 2012 indicated that SpaceX might have a family of Raptor-designated rocket engines in mind;[41] this was confirmed by SpaceX in October 2013.[12] However, in March 2014 SpaceX COO Gwynne Shotwell clarified that the focus of the new engine development program is exclusively on the full-size Raptor engine; smaller subscale methalox engines were not planned on the development path to the very large Raptor engine.[42]

In October 2013, SpaceX announced that they would be performing methane engine tests of Raptor engine components at the John C. Stennis Space Center in Hancock County, Mississippi,[43][44] and that SpaceX would add equipment to the existing test stand infrastructure in order to support liquid methane and hot gaseous methane[16] engine component testing.[45] In April 2014, SpaceX completed the requisite upgrades and maintenance to the Stennis test stand to prepare for testing of Raptor components,[46] and the engine component testing program began in earnest, focusing on the development of robust startup and shutdown procedures, something that is typically quite difficult to do for full-flow staged combustion cycle engines. Component testing at Stennis also allowed hardware characterization and verification of proprietary analytical software models that SpaceX developed to push the technology on this engine cycle that had little prior development work in the West.[16]

October 2013 was the first time SpaceX disclosed a nominal design thrust of the Raptor engine—2,900 kN (661,000 lbf)[12]—although early in 2014 they announced a Raptor engine with greater thrust, and in 2015, one with lower thrust that might better optimize thrust-to-weight.

In February 2014, Tom Mueller, the head of rocket engine development at SpaceX, revealed in a speech that Raptor was being designed for use on a vehicle where nine engines would "put over 100 tons of cargo up to Mars" and that the rocket would be more powerful than previously released publicly, producing greater than 4,400 kN (1,000,000 lbf).[22][47] A June 2014 talk by Mueller provided more specific engine performance target specifications indicating 6,900 kN (1,600,000 lbf) of sea-level thrust, 8,200 kN (1,800,000 lbf) of vacuum thrust, and a specific impulse (Isp) of 380 s (3,700 m/s) for a vacuum version.[48] Earlier information had estimated the design Isp under vacuum conditions as only 363 s (3,560 m/s).[22] Jeff Thornburg, who led development of the Raptor engine at SpaceX 2011–2015, noted that methane rocket engines have higher performance than kerosene/RP-1 and lower than hydrogen, with significantly fewer problems for long-term, multi-start engine designs than kerosene—methane is cleaner burning—and significantly lower cost than hydrogen, coupled with the ability to "live off the land" and produce methane directly from extraterrestrial sources.[49][50]

SpaceX successfully began development testing of injectors in 2014 and completed a full-power test of a full-scale oxygen preburner in 2015. 76 hot fire tests of the preburner, totaling some 400 seconds of test time, were executed from April–August 2015.[27] SpaceX completed its planned testing at NASA Stennis in 2014 and 2015.[51]

In January 2015, Elon Musk stated that the thrust they were currently targeting was around 230 tonnes-force (2,300 kN; 510,000 lbf), much lower than older statements mentioned. This brought into question much of the speculation surrounding a 9-engine booster, as he stated "there will be a lot of [engines]".[52] By August 2015, an Elon Musk statement surfaced that indicated the oxidizer to fuel ratio of the Mars-bound engine would be approximately 3.8 to 1.[2]

In January 2016, the US Air Force awarded a US$33.6 million development contract to SpaceX to develop a prototype version of its methane-fueled reusable Raptor engine for use on the upper stage of the Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy launch vehicles, which required double-matching funding by SpaceX of at least US$67.3 million. Work under the contract is expected to be completed in 2018, with engine performance testing to be done at NASA's John C. Stennis Space Center in Mississippi and Los Angeles Air Force Base, California.[28][29]

Engine development and testing
First test firing of a Raptor development engine on 25 September 2016 in McGregor, Texas
Testing of the Raptor's oxygen preburner at Stennis Space Center in 2015

Initial development testing[27] of Raptor methane engine components was done at the Stennis Space Center in Hancock County, Mississippi, where SpaceX added equipment to the existing infrastructure in order to support liquid methane engine testing.[12][45] Initial testing was limited to components of the Raptor engine, since the 440 kN (100,000 lbf) test stands at the E-2 complex at Stennis were not large enough to test the full Raptor engine. The development Raptor engine discussed in the October 2013 time frame relative to Stennis testing was designed to generate more than 2,900 kN (661,000 lbf) vacuum thrust.[12] A revised, higher-thrust, specification was discussed by the company in February 2014, but it was unclear whether that higher thrust was something that would be achieved with the initial development engines.[22] Raptor engine component testing began in May 2014[46] at the E-2 test complex which SpaceX modified to support methane engine tests.[12] The first items tested were single Raptor injector elements,[53] various designs of high-volume gas injectors.[54] The modifications to the test stands made by SpaceX are now a part of the Stennis test infrastructure and are available to other users of the test facility after the SpaceX facility lease was completed.[12] SpaceX successfully completed a "round of main injector testing in late 2014" and a "full-power test of the oxygen preburner component" for Raptor by June 2015. Tests continued at least into September 2015.[27]

By early 2016, SpaceX had constructed a new engine test stand at their site of McGregor in central Texas that can handle the larger thrust of the full Raptor engine.[16][12]

By August 2016, the first integrated Raptor rocket engine, manufactured at the SpaceX Hawthorne facility in California, shipped to the McGregor rocket engine test facility in Texas for development testing.[55] The engine had 1 MN (220,000 lbf) thrust, which makes it approximately one-third the size of the full-scale Raptor engine planned for flight tests in 2019/2020 timeframe. It is the first full-flow staged-combustion methalox engine ever to reach a test stand.[16] This 2016 development engine had "an expansion ratio of just 150, the maximum possible within Earth’s atmosphere" to prevent flow separation problems.[16] It performed an initial 9-second firing test on 26 September 2016, the day before Musk's talk at the International Aeronautical Congress.

On 26 September 2016, Elon Musk tweeted two images of the first test firing of an integrated Raptor in SpaceX's McGregor test complex.[56][57] On the same day Musk revealed that their target performance for Raptor was a vacuum specific impulse of 382 s (3,750 m/s), with a thrust of 3 MN (670,000 lbf), a chamber pressure of 300 bar (30 MPa; 4,400 psi), and an expansion ratio of 150 for an altitude optimized version.[58][59][60] When asked if the nozzle diameter for such version was 14 ft (4.3 m), he stated that it was pretty close to that dimension. He also disclosed that it used multi-stage turbopumps.[61][62] On the 27th he clarified that 150 expansion ratio was for the development version, that the production vacuum version would have an expansion ratio of 200.[63] Substantial additional technical details of the ITS propulsion were summarized in a technical article on the Raptor engine published the next week.[16]

By September 2017, the development Raptor engine—with 200 bars (20 MPa; 2,900 psi) chamber pressure—had undergone 1200 seconds of test fire testing in ground-test stands across 42 main engine tests, with the longest test being 100 seconds (which is limited by the capacity of the ground-test propellant tanks). As of September 2017, the first version of the flight engine is intended to operate at a chamber pressure of 250 bars (25 MPa; 3,600 psi), with the intent to raise it to 300 bars (30 MPa; 4,400 psi) at a later time.[64]

By September 2017, the 200 bars (20 MPa; 2,900 psi) sub-scale test engine, with a thrust of 1 meganewton (220,000 lbf) and "a new alloy to help its oxygen-rich turbopump resist oxidization, ... had completed 1200 seconds of firings across 42 tests."[65]

While plans for Raptor flight testing have consistently been on the new-generation fiber-composite-material construction flight vehicles since 2016, the specific vehicle was not clarified until October 2017, when it was indicated that initial suborbital test flights would occur with a Big Falcon Ship.[66] In November 2016, the first flight tests of the Raptor engine were projected to be on the Interplanetary Transport System, no earlier than the early 2020s.[16] By July 2017, the plan had been modified to do flight testing on a much smaller launch vehicle and spacecraft, and the new system architecture had "evolved quite a bit" since the ITS concept from 2016. A key driver of the 2017 architecture was to make the new system useful for substantial Earth-orbit and Cislunar launches so that the new system might pay for itself, in part, through economic spaceflight activities in the near-Earth space zone.[67][10]

Elon Musk announced in September 2017 that the initial flight platform for any Raptor engine would be some part of the Big Falcon Rocket. BFR was a 9 m (30 ft)-diameter launch vehicle.[64] In October 2017, Musk clarified that "[initial flight testing will be with] a full-scale 9-meter-diameter ship doing short hops of a few hundred kilometers altitude and lateral distance ... [projected to be] fairly easy on the vehicle, as no heat shield is needed, we can have a large amount of reserve propellant and don’t need the high area ratio, deep-space Raptor engines."[66]

Notably, Musk also announced that the new Raptor-powered BFR launch vehicle was planned to entirely replace both Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy launch vehicles as well as the Dragon 2 in the existing operational SpaceX fleet in the early 2020s, initially aiming at the Earth-orbit market, but SpaceX is explicitly designing in substantial capability to the spacecraft vehicles to support long-duration spaceflight in the cislunar and Mars mission environment as well. SpaceX intends this approach to bring significant cost savings which will help the company justify the development expense of designing and building the new launch vehicle design.[64] In addition to orbital spaceflight missions, BFR is being considered for the point-to-point Earth transportation market,[66] with ~30–60-minute flights to nearly anywhere on the planet.[64]

The first flight version of the Raptor engine arrived in McGregor, Texas in late January 2019.[68]

On 3 February 2019, SpaceX performed the first test of a flight version engine. The test lasted two seconds with the engine operating at 60 percent of rated thrust at a chamber pressure of 170 bars (17,000 kPa).[69] Just four days later, the test engine achieved the power levels needed for use in SpaceX Starship.[70] The engine reached 172 tonnes-force (1,690 kN; 380,000 lbf) thrust with a chamber pressure of 257 bars (25.7 MPa). The test was conducted using warm propellant, with expectations of a 10% to 20% increase in performance when switching to deep cryogenic temperatures for the propellant.[71] On 10 February 2019, Musk announced on Twitter that the flight version engine had attained the chamber combustion pressure of 268.9 bars (26.89 MPa) on a test stand.[72] On 19 June 2020, Musk announced that the Raptor engine tests achived the expected chamber combustion pressure of 300 bars (30 MPa) on a test stand.[5][6]

By March, serial number 2 (SN2) of the flight version Raptor engine had been delivered to the SpaceX South Texas Launch Site east of Brownsville, Texas for system integration testing on the Starhopper, the first test article of Starship,[73] approximately one year ahead of schedule.[74] SN2 was used for two tethered integration tests of the flight test "hopper" in early April. Serial numbers 3, 4, 5 and 6 had all made it to the test stand by early July, but the first three had issues of various sorts and SpaceX did not try any flight tests of the Starhopper test vehicle. SN6 was still under test on the ground test stand as of 8 July 2019.[75]

The first flight test of a Raptor engine occurred on 25 July 2019 at the SpaceX South Texas Launch Site. Unusually, for initial flight tests of orbital-class rocket engines, this was not a full-duration burn but just a 22-second test. SpaceX is developing their next-generation rocket to be reusable from the beginning, just like an aircraft, and thus needs to start with narrow flight test objectives, while still aiming to land the rocket successfully to be used subsequently in further tests to expand the flight envelope.[13]

Another flight test of a Raptor engine (probably SN6) occurred on 27 August 2019 from Boca Chica, Texas, test facility. The Starhopper reached an estimated altitude of 150 m (FAA approved). A side step and a perfect landing on a nearby landing pad terminated the roughly 1 minute flight. [76]

Versions

The Raptor methalox engine for SpaceX next-generation launch vehicles have gone through a number of design concepts for engine thrust, specific impulse, and sea-level-nozzle/vacuum-nozzle sizings, depending on the vehicle design concept SpaceX was working on at the time, and subscale versions of Raptor engines were also built for early testing on ground test stands. After 2013, all engine design concepts were methalox using the full-flow staged combustion (FFSC) cycle. In addition, in 2016–2018, a custom prototype upper-stage methalox FFSC Raptor engine was designed and tested for the Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy launch vehicles, strictly for the US Air Force to meet US military space readiness objectives. SpaceX never implemented plans to switch the F9/FH upper stage to methalox propellants.

SpaceX next-generation launch vehicle

In September 2016 at the IAC meetings, Musk mentioned several Raptor engine designs that could be used on the Interplanetary Transport System by late in the decade. In addition, a much smaller subscale engine had already been built for test and validation of the new full-flow staged-combustion cycle engine. At that time, this first subscale Raptor development engine had recently been tested on a ground test stand, but for only one brief firing.[16]

The "Raptor subscale development engine" had approximately 1,000 kN (220,000 lbf) thrust.[16] In order to eliminate flow separation problems while being tested in Earth's atmosphere, the test nozzle expansion ratio had been limited to only 150. The engine began testing in September 2016 on aground test stand. Sources differed on the performance of the test engine. In reporting during the two weeks following the Musk ITS launch vehicle reveal on 27 September, NASASpaceFlight.com indicated that the development engine was only one-third the size of any of the several larger engine designs that were discussed for the later flight vehicles.[16]

For the flight vehicles, Elon Musk discussed two engines: both a low-expansion ratio (ER40) for the first stage, or ITS booster and a higher-expansion ratio (200) to obtain higher performance with the second stage. 42 of these ER40 engines were envisioned in the high-level design of the first stage, with 3,050 kN (690,000 lbf) of thrust at sea-level, and 3,285 kN (738,000 lbf) in vacuum.[16] In addition, three gimbaled short-nozzle ER40 engines were to be used for maneuvering the 2016-design ITS second-stage; and these engines were also expected to be used for retropropulsive landings on Mars (with mean atmospheric pressure on the Martian surface of 600 Pa (0.0060 bar; 0.087 psi),[77]). The higher-efficiency engine for in-space flight in vacuum conditions was envisioned then to target a specific impulse of 382s, using a much larger nozzle giving an expansion ratio of 200.[18] Six of these non-gimbaled engines were planned to provide primary propulsion for the 2016 designs of the Interplanetary Spaceship and the Earth-orbit ITS tanker. As designed, both of those vehicles were to play a short-term role as second stages on launches to Earth orbit, as well as provide high-Isp efficiency on transfer from geocentric to heliocentric orbit for transport to beyond-Earth-orbit celestial bodies. 3,500 kN (790,000 lbf) thrust at vacuum, the only conditions under which the six ER200 engines were expected to be fired.[16]

A year later, at the IAC meetings in September 2017, and following a year of testing and iterative development by the propulsion team, Musk said that a smaller Raptor engine—with slightly over half as much thrust as the previous concept designs for the ITS—would be used on the next-generation rocket, now a 9 m (30 ft)-diameter launch vehicle and publicly referred to as Big Falcon Rocket (BFR). With the much smaller launch vehicle, fewer Raptor engines would be used on each stage. BFR was then slated to have 31 Raptors on the first stage and 6 on the second stage.[78][16] By mid-2018, SpaceX was publicly stating that the sea-level flight version Raptor engine design, with a nozzle exit diameter of 1.3 m (4.3 ft), was expected to have 1,700 kN (380,000 lbf) thrust at sea-level with an Isp of 330 s (3,200 m/s) increasing to an Isp of 356 s (3,490 m/s) in vacuum.[65] The vacuum flight version, with a nozzle exit diameter of 2.4 m (7.9 ft), was expected to exert 1,900 kN (430,000 lbf) force with an Isp of 375 s (3,680 m/s).[65] The earliest versions of the flight engine is designed to operate at 250 bars (25,000 kPa; 3,600 psi) chamber pressure; but SpaceX expects to increase this to 300 bar (30,000 kPa; 4,400 psi) in later iterations.[65] The flight engine is designed for extreme reliability, aiming to support the airline-level of safety required by the point-to-point Earth transportation market.[66]

In the BFR update given in September 2018, Musk showed video of a 71-second hot fire test of a Raptor engine, and stated that "this is the Raptor engine that will power BFR, both the ship and the booster; it's the same engine. ... approximately a 200 tonne engine aiming for roughly 300 bar chamber pressure. ... If you had it at a high expansion ratio, has the potential to have a specific impulse of 380."[5]

Upper stage engine prototype

In January 2016, the US Air Force (USAF) awarded a US$33.6 million development contract to SpaceX to develop a prototype version of its methane-fueled reusable Raptor engine for use on the upper stage of the Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy launch vehicles. The contract required double-matching funding by SpaceX of at least US$67.3 million.[28][79] Work under the contract was expected to be completed no later than December 2018, and engine performance testing was planned to be completed at NASA's John C. Stennis Space Center in Mississippi under US Air Force supervision.[28][29] The USAF contract called only for the development and build of a prototype engine with a series of ground tests, with no upper stage launch vehicle design funded by the contract.[28] The Air Force was working with the US Congress in February 2016 to pursue new launch systems."[80]

In October 2017 the US Air Force (USAF) awarded a US$40.8 million modification for the development of the Raptor rocket propulsion system prototype for the Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle program, with work under that contract expected to be completed by April 2018.[81]

Little technical detail was ever publicly released about the USAF second stage engine, as is typical for defense contracts. The prototype however was to be designed:[28]

  • to serve the theoretical purpose of servicing an upper stage that could be used on the existing SpaceX Falcon 9 (7,600 kN (1,700,000 lbf)-class[82]) and the existing Falcon Heavy (23,000 kN (5,200,000 lbf)-class[83]) first-stage sea-level thrust launch vehicles.
  • with propellants: liquid methane and liquid oxygen (LOX),[29]
  • with the Raptor full-flow staged combustion engine cycle,[29]
  • explicitly to be a reusable engine[29]

The USAF contract called only for the development and build of a prototype, to be demonstrated in a USAF-supervised set of tests. No upper stage vehicle design/redesign was funded by the contract.[28] Neither the Air Force nor SpaceX subsequently published any results of this non-Starship oriented rocket engine contract.

Comparison to other engines
Main article: Comparison of orbital rocket engines
Engine Rockets Thrust
kN (lbf)		 Specific impulse
(in vacuum)		 Thrust-to-
weight ratio		 Propellant Cycle
Blue Origin BE-4
(in development)		 New Glenn, Vulcan 2,400 (550,000)[84] CH
4 / LOX		 Staged combustion, oxidizer-‍rich
Energomash RD-170/171M Energia, Zenit, Soyuz-5 7,904 (1,777,000)[85] 337.2 s (3,307 m/s)[85] 79.57[85] RP-1 / LOX Staged combustion, oxidizer-‍rich
Energomash RD-180 Atlas III, Atlas V 4,152 (933,000)[86] 338 s (3,310 m/s)[86] 78.44[86]
Energomash RD-191/181 Angara, Antares 2,090 (470,000)[87] 337.5 s (3,310 m/s)[87] 89[87]
Energomash RD-275M Proton-M 1,832 (412,000) 315.8 s (3,097 m/s) 174.5 N
2O
4 / UDMH
Kuznetsov NK-33 N1, Soyuz-2-1v 1,638 (368,000)[88] 331 s (3,250 m/s)[88] 136.66[88] RP-1 / LOX Staged combustion, oxidizer-‍rich
Rocketdyne F-1 Saturn V 7,740 (1,740,000) 304 s (2,980 m/s)[89] 83 RP-1 / LOX Gas generator
Rocketdyne RS-25 Space Shuttle, SLS 2,280 (510,000) 453 s (4,440 m/s)[90] 73[91] LH2 / LOX Staged combustion, fuel-‍rich
SpaceX Merlin 1D sea-level Falcon booster stage 914 (205,000) 311 s (3,050 m/s)[92] 176[93] RP-1 / LOX
(subcooled)		 Gas generator
SpaceX Merlin 1D vacuum Falcon upper stage 934 (210,000)[94] 348 s (3,410 m/s)[94] 180[93]
SpaceX Raptor sea-level
(in development)		 SpaceX Starship 1,670–1,690 (370,000–380,000)[95] ~350 s (3.4 km/s)[96] ≥ 170 (goal)[4] CH
4 / LOX
(subcooled)		 Full-flow staged combustion
SpaceX Raptor vacuum (future) ~380 s (3,700 m/s)[96]

Applications

As of September 2016, the Raptor engine was slated to be used in three spaceflight vehicles making up the two launch stages of an ITS stack. The first stage would always be ITS booster while the second stage may be either an Interplanetary Spaceship (for beyond-Earth-orbit missions) or an ITS tanker (for on-orbit propellant transfer operations nearer to Earth).

The SpaceX 2016-design of the Interplanetary booster was announced with 42 sea-level optimized Raptors in the first stage of the ITS with a total of 128 MN (29,000,000 lbf) of thrust. The SpaceX Interplanetary Spaceship—which made up the second stage of the ITS on Earth launches was also an interplanetary spacecraft carrying cargo and passengers to beyond-Earth-orbit destinations after on-orbit refueling—was slated in the 2016 design to use six vacuum-optimized Raptors for primary propulsion plus three Raptors with sea-level nozzles for maneuvering.[97]

The SpaceX design after late 2017 is for a much smaller launch vehicle, 9 meters in diameter rather than 12 meters for the ITS, and is now known as Starship. The Starship first stage (now known as Super Heavy) was slated to have 31 sea-level optimized Raptors in the initial design concept, with a total of 48 MN (11,000,000 lbf) of thrust. The Starship will use three vacuum-optimized Raptors for primary propulsion plus three sea-level Raptors for maneuvering.[64][98] SpaceX is building the Starship vehicles at the SpaceX South Texas Launch Site.[99]

See also

References
  1. Elon Musk [@elonmusk] (7 May 2020). "Starship + Super Heavy propellant mass is 4800 tons (78% O2 & 22% CH4). I think we can get propellant cost down to ~$100/ton in volume, so ~$500k/flight. With high flight rate, probably below $1.5M fully burdened cost for 150 tons to orbit or ~$10/kg" (Tweet) – via Twitter.
  2. How (and Why) SpaceX Will Colonize Mars, accessed 19 August 2015. Musk: "The critical elements of the solution are rocket reusability and low cost propellant (CH4 and O2 at an O/F ratio of ~3.8). And, of course, making the return propellant on Mars, which has a handy CO2 atmosphere and lots of H2O frozen in the soil."
  3. "Raptor Engine". SpaceX.com. Retrieved 2 October 2019.
  4. Elon Musk on Twitter: Max thrust version of Raptor should achieve true T/W > 170. Target is 1.5 ton engine with >260 t-F. Max Isp version should achieve ~380 sec, but T/W probably <120 due to big nozzle. These are just guesses for now.
  5. Musk, Elon (17 September 2018). "First Lunar BFR Mission". YouTube. Event occurs at 45:30. And this is the Raptor engine that will power BFR both the ship and the booster, it’s the same engine. And this is approximately a 200-ton thrust engine that’s aiming for roughly a 300-bar or 300-atmosphere chamber pressure. And if you have it at a high expansion ratio it has the potential to have a specific impulse of 380.
  6. Elon Musk on Twitter:Reaching chamber pressure of 300 atmospheres
  7. https://www.spacex.com/starship
  8. Musk, Elon (29 September 2017). "Making Life Multiplanetary". youtube.com. SpaceX. Retrieved 29 September 2017.
  9. Markusic, Tom (28 July 2010). SpaceX Propulsion (PDF). 46th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference. pp. 12–15. Retrieved 28 October 2015.
  10. Grush, Loren (28 September 2017). "What to expect from Elon Musk's Mars colonization update this week". The Verge.
  11. Chris Gebhardt (29 September 2017). "The Moon, Mars, & around the Earth – Musk updates BFR architecture, plans". NASASpaceflight.com. Archived from the original on 1 October 2017. Retrieved 2 October 2017. In a move that would have seemed crazy a few years ago, Mr. Musk stated that the goal of BFR is to make the Falcon 9 and the Falcon Heavy rockets and their crew/uncrewed Dragon spacecrafts redundant, thereby allowing the company to shift all resources and funding allocations from those vehicles to BFR. Making the Falcon 9, Falcon Heavy, and Dragon redundant would also allow BFR to perform the same Low Earth Orbit (LEO) and Beyond LEO satellite deployment missions as Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy – just on a more economical scale as multiple satellites would be able to launch at the same time and on the same rocket thanks to BFR's immense size.
  12. Leone, Dan (25 October 2013). "SpaceX Could Begin Testing Methane-fueled Engine at Stennis Next Year". Space News. Retrieved 26 October 2013.
  13. Burghardt, Thomas (25 July 2019). "Starhopper successfully conducts debut Boca Chica Hop". NASASpaceFlight.com. Retrieved 26 July 2019.
  14. Todd, David (22 November 2012). "SpaceX's Mars rocket to be methane-fuelled". Flightglobal. Retrieved 5 December 2012. Musk said Lox and methane would be SpaceX’s propellants of choice on a mission to Mars, which has long been his stated goal. SpaceX’s initial work will be to build a Lox/methane rocket for a future upper stage, codenamed Raptor. The design of this engine would be a departure from the "open cycle" gas generator system that the current Merlin 1 engine series uses. Instead, the new rocket engine would use a much more efficient "staged combustion" cycle that many Russian rocket engines use.
  15. "Space Shuttle Main Engines". NASA. Retrieved 6 March 2013.
  16. Belluscio, Alejandro G. (3 October 2016). "ITS Propulsion – The evolution of the SpaceX Raptor engine". NASASpaceFlight.com. Retrieved 3 October 2016.
  17. Bergin, Chris (29 August 2014). "Battle of the Heavyweight Rockets -- SLS could face Exploration Class rival". NASAspaceflight.com. Retrieved 30 August 2014.
  18. Musk, Elon (27 September 2016). "SpaceX IAC 2016 Announcement" (PDF). Mars Presentation. SpaceX. Archived from the original (PDF) on 28 September 2016. Retrieved 27 September 2016.
  19. Elon Musk, Mike Suffradini (7 July 2015). Elon Musk comments on Falcon 9 explosion – Huge Blow for SpaceX (video). Event occurs at 39:25–40:45. Archived from the original on 6 September 2015. Retrieved 30 December 2015.
  20. Gwynne Shotwell (17 March 2015). "Statement of Gwynne Shotwell, President & Chief Operating Officer, Space Exploration Technologies Corp. (SpaceX)" (PDF). Congressional testimony. US House of Representatives, Committee on Armed Service Subcommittee on Strategic Forces. pp. 14–15. Retrieved 11 January 2016. SpaceX has already begun self-funded development and testing on our next-generation Raptor engine. ... Raptor development ... will not require external development funds related to this engine.
  21. Nardi, Tom (13 February 2019). "The "impossible" tech behind SpaceX's new engine". Hackaday.
  22. Belluscio, Alejandro G. (7 March 2014). "SpaceX advances drive for Mars rocket via Raptor power". NASAspaceflight.com. Retrieved 7 March 2014.
  23. "The wild physics of Elon Musk's methane-guzzling super-rocket". 31 July 2019.
  24. Characteristics of Gas-Centered Swirl-Coaxial Injector with Liquid Flow Excitation, AIAA, 25 February 2019, accessed 8 June 2019.
  25. Elon Musk [@elonmusk] (26 May 2019). "Raptor uses a large number of coaxial swirl injectors, which (we believe) achieves highest theoretical mixing/combustion efficiency" (Tweet) – via Twitter.
  26. Ralph, Eric (27 August 2019). "SpaceX scrubs Starhopper's final Raptor-powered flight as Elon Musk talks 'finicky' igniters". Teslarati. Retrieved 27 August 2019. Raptor uses those spark plugs to ignite its ignition sources [forming] full-up blow torches ... —likely miniature rocket engines using the same methane and oxygen fuel as Raptor—then ignite the engine’s methane and oxygen preburners before finally igniting those mixed, high-pressure gases in the combustion chamber.
  27. "NASA-SpaceX testing partnership going strong" (PDF). Lagniappe, John C. Stennis Space Center. NASA. September 2015. Retrieved 10 January 2016. this project is strictly private industry development for commercial use
  28. "Contracts: Air Force". U.S. Department of Defense (Press release). 13 January 2016. Retrieved 15 January 2016.
  29. Gruss, Mike (13 January 2016). "Orbital ATK, SpaceX Win Air Force Propulsion Contracts". SpaceNews. Retrieved 15 January 2016.
  30. "Long term SpaceX vehicle plans". HobbySpace.com. 7 July 2009. Archived from the original on 14 February 2010. Retrieved 13 July 2009.
  31. "Notes: Space Access'11: Thurs. – Afternoon session – Part 2: SpaceX". RLV and Space Transport News. 7 April 2011. Archived from the original on 20 March 2012. Retrieved 8 April 2011.
  32. "SpaceX Raptor LH2/LOX engine". RLV and Space Transport News. 8 August 2011. Archived from the original on 2 November 2011. Retrieved 9 August 2011.
  33. Rosenberg, Zach (16 March 2012). "SpaceX readies upgraded engines". Flightglobal. Retrieved 17 March 2012. SpaceX is in the midst of a variety of ambitious engine programmes, including the Merlin 2, a significant modification of the Merlin 1 series, and the Raptor upper stage engine. Details of both projects are tightly held.
  34. Rosenberg, Zach (15 October 2012). "SpaceX aims big with massive new rocket". Flightglobal. Retrieved 17 October 2012.
  35. Todd, David (20 November 2012). "Musk goes for methane-burning reusable rockets as step to colonise Mars". FlightGlobal Hyperbola. Archived from the original on 11 June 2016. Retrieved 4 November 2015. "We are going to do methane." Musk announced as he described his future plans for reusable launch vehicles including those designed to take astronauts to Mars within 15 years, "The energy cost of methane is the lowest and it has a slight Isp (Specific Impulse) advantage over Kerosene," said Musk adding, "And it does not have the pain in the ass factor that hydrogen has".
  36. GPUs to Mars: Full-Scale Simulation of SpaceX's Mars Rocket Engine. YouTube. 5 May 2015. Retrieved 4 June 2015.
  37. mmooney (8 November 2015). "In-Situ Resource Utilization – Mars Atmosphere/Gas Chemical Processing". NASA SBIR/STTR. NASA. Retrieved 2 June 2015.
  38. "Comparative study of ISRU-based transportation architectures for the Moon and Mars: LOX/LH2 vs. LOX/Methane" (PDF). Lunar and Planetary Institute. Retrieved 2 June 2015.
  39. Foust, Jeff (27 September 2016). "SpaceX's Mars plans call for massive 42-engine reusable rocket". SpaceNews. Retrieved 7 April 2018. Musk stated it’s possible that the first spaceship would be ready for tests in four years... 'We’re kind of being intentionally fuzzy about the timeline,' he said. 'We’re going to try and make as much progress as we can with a very constrained budget.'
  40. Jeff Foust (15 October 2017). "Musk offers more technical details on BFR system". SpaceNews. Retrieved 7 April 2018.
  41. Todd, David (20 November 2012). "Musk goes for methane-burning reusable rockets as step to colonise Mars". FlightGlobal Hyperbola. Retrieved 22 November 2012. The new Raptor upper stage engine is likely to be only the first engine in a series of lox/methane engines.
  42. Gwynne Shotwell (21 March 2014). Broadcast 2212: Special Edition, interview with Gwynne Shotwell (audio file). The Space Show. Event occurs at 21:25–22:10. 2212. Archived from the original (mp3) on 22 March 2014. Retrieved 22 March 2014. our focus is the full Raptor size
  43. "NASA Stennis Space Center to Test SpaceX Next Generation Rocket Engines Systems". Mississippi Development Authority. 23 October 2013. Retrieved 27 October 2013.
  44. "Cochran: Space-X Decision Bodes Well for Job Growth in South Mississippi". Senator Cochran. 23 October 2013. Retrieved 27 October 2013.
  45. Messier, Doug (23 October 2013). "SpaceX to Conduct Raptor Engine Testing in Mississippi". Parabolic Arc. Retrieved 23 October 2013.
  46. Guess, Natalie (21 April 2014). "NASA, SpaceX Cut Ribbon To Launch Testing Partnership". MS EIGS. Retrieved 22 April 2014.
  47. "SpaceX propulsion chief elevates crowd in Santa Barbara". Pacific Business Times. 19 February 2014. Retrieved 22 February 2014.
  48. Butler, Amy; Svitak, Amy. "AR1 vs. Raptor: New rocket program will likely pit kerosene against methane" (2014-06-09). Aviation Week & Space Technology. SpaceX is developing the Raptor as a reusable engine for a heavy-lift Mars vehicle, the first stage of which will feature 705 tonnes-force (6,910 kN; 1,550,000 lbf) thrust, making it 'slightly larger than the Apollo F-1 engine,' Tom Mueller, SpaceX vice president of propulsion development, said during a space propulsion conference last month in Cologne, Germany. The vacuum version is targeting 840 tonnes-force (8,200 kN; 1,900,000 lbf) thrust with 380 s (3,700 m/s). of specific impulse. The company is testing subscale components using the E-2 test stand at NASA's Stennis Space Center in Mississippi, says Stennis spokeswoman Rebecca Strecker. ... Mueller said many people ask why the company switch to methane for its Mars rocket. With reusability in mind, SpaceX's cost studies revealed that 'by far the most cost-effective propellant to use is methane,' he said, which would be easier than hydrogen to manufacture on Mars.
  49. "The Wind Rises at SpaceX". SpaceNews. 24 December 2015. Retrieved 26 December 2015.
  50. "SpaceX Prepared Testimony by Jeffrey Thornburg". SpaceRef. 26 June 2015.
  51. "Stennis set for busy 2016 test schedule" (PDF). Lagniappe. NASA-John C. Stennis Space Center. February 2016. p. 3. Retrieved 2 March 2016. After completing successful test series in 2014 and 2015 on components for the new Raptor rocket engine being developed by SpaceX, there also is hope for additional test agreements with the company.
  52. Musk, E. (6 January 2015) "Thrust to weight is optimizing for a surprisingly low thrust level, even when accounting for the added mass of plumbing and structure for many engines. Looks like a little over 230 tonnes-force (2,300 kN; 510,000 lbf) metric tons (~500 klbf) of thrust per engine, but we will have a lot of them :)" Reddit.com
  53. "SpaceX to test methane rocket engine in Miss". The Sacramento Bee. 22 April 2014. Archived from the original on 29 April 2014.
  54. SpaceX Commercial Spaceflight Archived 22 March 2015 at the Wayback Machine, Garrett Reisman, Future in Space Operations (FISO) Colloquium, 2014-08-27, Retrieved 28 August 2014.
  55. Berger, Eric (10 August 2016). "SpaceX has shipped its Mars engine to Texas for tests". Ars Technica. Retrieved 17 August 2016.
  56. Musk, Elon (26 September 2016). "Mach diamonds". Twitter.com. Archived from the original on 26 September 2016. Retrieved 26 September 2016.
  57. Musk, Elon (26 September 2016). "SpaceX propulsion just achieved first firing of the Raptor interplanetary transport engine". Twitter.com. Archived from the original on 26 September 2016. Retrieved 26 September 2016.
  58. Musk, Elon (26 September 2016). "Production Raptor goal is specific impulse of 382 seconds and thrust of 3 MN (~310 metric tons) at 300 bar". Twitter.com. Archived from the original on 26 September 2016. Retrieved 26 September 2016.
  59. Musk, Elon (26 September 2016). "Chamber pressure is almost 3X Merlin, so engine is about the same size for a given area ratio". Twitter.com. Archived from the original on 26 September 2016. Retrieved 26 September 2016.
  60. Musk, Elon (26 September 2016). "382s is with a 150 area ratio vacuum (or Mars ambient pressure) nozzle. Will go over specs for both versions on Tues". Twitter.com. Archived from the original on 26 September 2016. Retrieved 26 September 2016.
  61. Musk, Elon (26 September 2016). "based on your other specs, is that like a ~14 foot diameter nozzle? Elon Musk: pretty close". Twitter.com. Archived from the original on 26 September 2016. Retrieved 26 September 2016.
  62. Musk, Elon (26 September 2016). "Sweet Jesus, that means you are pumping to 45-50 MPa... Surely this will be using multiple stage pumps? Elon Musk: yes". Twitter.com. Archived from the original on 26 September 2016. Retrieved 26 September 2016.
  63. Musk, Elon (26 September 2016). "Meant to say 200 AR for production vac engine. Dev will be up to 150. Beyond that, too much flow separation in Earth atmos". Twitter.com. Archived from the original on 27 September 2016. Retrieved 26 September 2016.
  64. Elon Musk speech: Becoming a Multiplanet Species, 29 September 2017, 68th annual meeting of the International Astronautical Congress in Adelaide, Australia
  65. Gaynor, Phillip (9 August 2018). "The Evolution of the Big Falcon Rocket". NASASpaceFlight.com. Retrieved 17 August 2018.
  66. Foust, Jeff (15 October 2017). "Musk offers more technical details on BFR system". SpaceNews. Retrieved 15 October 2017. [initial flight testing will be with] a full-scale ship doing short hops of a few hundred kilometers altitude and lateral distance ... fairly easy on the vehicle, as no heat shield is needed, we can have a large amount of reserve propellant and don’t need the high area ratio, deep space Raptor engines. ... 'The engine thrust dropped roughly in proportion to the vehicle mass reduction from the first IAC talk,' Musk wrote when asked about that reduction in thrust. The reduction in thrust also allows for the use of multiple engines, giving the vehicle an engine-out capability for landings. ... Musk was optimistic about scaling up the Raptor engine from its current developmental model to the full-scale one. 'Thrust scaling is the easy part. Very simple to scale the dev Raptor to 170 tons,' he wrote. 'The flight engine design is much lighter and tighter, and is extremely focused on reliability.' He added the goal is to achieve 'passenger airline levels of safety' with the engine, required if the vehicle is to serve point-to-point transportation markets.
  67. Elon Musk (19 July 2017). Elon Musk, ISS R&D Conference (video). ISS R&D Conference, Washington DC, USA. Event occurs at 49:48–51:35. Retrieved 21 September 2017. the updated version of the Mars architecture: Because it has evolved quite a bit since that last talk. ... The key thing that I figured out is how do you pay for it? If we downsize the Mars vehicle, make it capable of doing Earth-orbit activity as well as Mars activity, maybe we can pay for it by using it for Earth-orbit activity. That is one of the key elements in the new architecture. It is similar to what was shown at IAC, but a little bit smaller. Still big, but this one has a shot at being real on the economic front.
  68. Ralph, Eric (1 February 2019). "SpaceX CEO Elon Musk reveals photos of Starship's first completed Raptor engine". TESLARATI.com. Retrieved 1 February 2019.
  69. Foust, Jeff (4 February 2019). "SpaceX tests flight version of Raptor engine". SpaceNews. Retrieved 5 February 2019.
  70. Musk, Elon (7 February 2019). "Raptor just achieved power level needed for Starship & Super Heavy". Twitter.com. Archived from the original on 7 February 2019. Retrieved 7 February 2019.
  71. Musk, Elon (7 February 2019). "Engine reached 172 mT & 257 bar chamber pressure with warm propellant". Twitter.com. Archived from the original on 7 February 2019. Retrieved 7 February 2019.
  72. Musk, Elon (10 February 2019). "Raptor reached 268.9 bar today". Twitter.com.
  73. @elonmusk (5 January 2019). "Aiming for 4 weeks [until the first hopper test], which probably means 8 weeks, due to unforeseen issues" (Tweet) – via Twitter.
  74. Kanter, Jake (11 January 2019). "Elon Musk released a photo of his latest rocket, and it already delivers on his promise of looking like liquid silver". Business Insider. Retrieved 13 January 2019.
  75. https://www.teslarati.com/spacex-elon-musk-raptor-engine-bug-fixes/
  76. Harwood, William (27 August 2019). "SpaceX launches Starship "hopper" on dramatic test flight". Retrieved 30 August 2019.
  77. Bolonkin, Alexander A. (2009). Artificial Environments on Mars. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer. pp. 599–625. ISBN 978-3-642-03629-3.
  78. Foust, Jeff (29 September 2017). "Musk unveils revised version of giant interplanetary launch system". SpaceNews. Retrieved 1 October 2017.
  79. "SpaceX, Orbital ATK + Blue Origin Signed On By SMC For Propulsion Prototypes". Satnews Daily. 13 January 2016. Retrieved 7 February 2016.
  80. Harper, Jon (11 February 2016). "Air Force Outlines Future Space Launch Plans". National Defense. Retrieved 12 February 2016.
  81. "Contracts: Air Force". U.S. Department of Defense Contracts press release. 19 October 2017. Retrieved 6 February 2018. Space Exploration Technologies Corp., Hawthorne, California, has been awarded a $40,766,512 modification (P00007) for the development of the Raptor rocket propulsion system prototype for the Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle program. Work will be performed at NASA Stennis Space Center, Mississippi; Hawthorne, California; McGregor, Texas; and Los Angeles Air Force Base, California; and is expected to be complete by April 30, 2018. Fiscal 2017 research, development, test and evaluation funds in the amount of $40,766,512 are being obligated at the time of award. The Launch Systems Enterprise Directorate, Space and Missile Systems Center, Los Angeles AFB, California, is the contracting activity (FA8811-16-9-0001).
  82. "Falcon 9". [SpaceX]. Retrieved 4 May 2016.
  83. "Falcon Heavy". [SpaceX]. Retrieved 4 May 2016.
  84. Ferster, Warren (17 September 2014). "ULA To Invest in Blue Origin Engine as RD-180 Replacement". Space News. Retrieved 19 September 2014.
  85. "RD-171M". NPO Energomash. Retrieved 30 June 2015.
  86. "RD-180". NPO Energomash. Retrieved 30 June 2015.
  87. "RD-191". NPO Energomash. Retrieved 7 April 2016.
  88. "NK-33". Astronautix.com. Retrieved 1 April 2015.
  89. "F-1". Astronautix.com. Archived from the original on 9 November 2013. Retrieved 2 November 2013.
  90. "SSME". Astronautix.com. Retrieved 2 November 2013.
  91. "Encyclopedia Astronautica: SSME". Retrieved 7 July 2014.
  92. "Merlin 1C". Astronautix.com. Retrieved 2 November 2013.
  93. Mueller, Thomas (8 June 2015). "Is SpaceX's Merlin 1D's thrust-to-weight ratio of 150+ believable?". Retrieved 9 July 2015.
  94. "SpaceX Falcon 9 product page". Retrieved 30 September 2016.
  95. "Design requires at least 170 metric tons of force. Engine reached 172 mT & 257 bar chamber pressure with warm propellant, which means 10% to 20% more with deep cryo". Retrieved 7 February 2019.
  96. "Sea level Raptor's vacuum Isp is ~350 sec, but ~380 sec with larger vacuum-optimized nozzle". Retrieved 11 September 2019.
  97. "Making Humans a Multiplanetary Species" (PDF). SpaceX. 28 September 2016. Archived from the original (PDF) on 28 September 2016. Retrieved 28 September 2016.
  98. Elon Musk on Twitter: 3 sea level optimized Raptors, 3 vacuum optimized Raptors (big nozzle)
  99. Ralph, Eric (16 February 2019). "SpaceX job posts confirm Starship's Super Heavy booster will be built in Texas". Teslarati. Retrieved 17 February 2019. fabricators will work to build the primary airframe of the Starship and Super Heavy vehicles at the SpaceX South Texas build site. [including] the tank (cylindrical structure), tank bulkheads, and other large associated structures for the flight article design of both vehicles.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.