Russia involvement in regime change

Russia involvement in regime change has entailed both overt and covert actions aimed at altering, replacing, or preserving foreign governments.

During World War II, the Soviet Union helped overthrow many Nazi Germany or imperial Japanese puppet regimes, including in East Asia and much of Europe. Soviet forces were also instrumental in ending the rule of Adolf Hitler over Germany.

In the aftermath of World War II, the Soviet government struggled with the United States for global leadership and influence within the context of the Cold War. It expanded the geographic scope of its actions beyond its traditional area of operations. In addition, the Soviet Union and Russia have interfered in the national elections of many countries. One study indicated that the Soviet Union and Russia engaged in 36 interventions in foreign elections from 1946 to 2000.[1][2][3]

The Soviet Union ratified the UN Charter in 1945, the preeminent international law document,[4] which legally bound the Soviet government to the Charter's provisions, including Article 2(4), which prohibits the threat or use of force in international relations, except in very limited circumstances.[5] Therefore, any legal claim advanced to justify regime change by a foreign power carries a particularly heavy burden.[6]

Following the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991, Russia has led or supported operations to determine the governance of a number of countries, whether involved in civil wars in Syria in the 2010s and 2020s or electoral interference like in Ukraine in 2004 and 2014.

1914–1941: World War I, the Revolution, the Civil War, and Interwar period

1910s

1918: Finland

Finland has been an autonomous part of the Russian Empire for a century. They had been slowly losing their autonomy under them, however that ended with the February Revolution in 1917. This caused Finland to question what its role should be now and if Finland should be independent. The conservatives and Socialists in Finland started politically fighting.[7] The social democrats took some power with "Law of Supreme Power" while Leftists tired to start a revolt which failed.[8] After losing the October 1917 Finnish Election the labor movement was radicalized leftward against moderate politics.[9] After the October Revolution the Bolsheviks took control of much of Russia and signed and armistice on December 7, 1917.[10] As that was happening Finland's parliament was agitating for independence. On December 4, 1917 the Senate introduced Finland's Declaration of Independence and it was soon adopted by Parliament on December 6, 1917. The Social Democrats and Socialists in the country opposed because they wanted to submit their own Declaration. In the end they went to Lenin to ask for permission to go along with it.[11] Lenin had thought that independent nations would have their own Proletariat revolutions and unite with Russia later. The Bolsheviks were focused on defeating the White Army in the Russian Civil War, however they were interested in retaking control of those former territories whether annexing them outright, or funding other leftists in those countries to take and perhaps unite with Russia later on.[12] Finland's short lived civil war would become an example of the latter.

After Finland declared independence tensions between the Left and Right only got worse. In January 1918 both groups started making defensive movements and countering one another.[13] On January 12, 1918 the Finnish Parliament passed a law allowing the Senate to establish order with an army lead by former Finnish Russian general Carl Gustaf Emil Mannerheim.[14] Tensions boiled up until the leftists mobilized their forces on January 27, 1918 and so the civil war began.[15][16] This soon saw the formation of the Red Army, representing the left, and the White Army, representing the right. The White Army has the support of the German Empire, who wanted to establish a Finnish puppet monarchy.[17] The Red Army formed the Finnish Socialist Workers' Republic and were supported by the Bolsheviks. While they were leftists the Red Army were ideologically Democratic Socialists not Bolsheviks, though there were a few Finnish Bolsheviks who wanted annexation.[18] As well the Finnish Red Army were against reuniting with Russia when they won and this caused strife between the both of them. As well Germany and the Bolsheviks were currently negotiating in Brest-Livtosk in order to end the war on the Eastern Front. The Germans leveraged the negotiations in order to get the Bolsheviks to be less involved in the war. the Bolsheviks had promised when they came to power to get out of World War I. They were eventually successful at that and on March 3, 1918 the Treaty of Brest-Livtosk was signed between the German Empire where the Bolsheviks exited the World War I while they handed over most of the eastern territory of the former Russian Empire, including Finland.[19] While some support remained the Whites ended up winning the civil war on May 15, 1918. Despite that the Germans would lose rule over Finland after they lost World War I.

1920s

1921-1924: Mongolia

The location of Mongolia

The Mongolian Revolution of 1911 saw Mongolia declare independence from the Qing Dynasty in China, ruled by Bogd Khan. In 1912, the Qing Dynasty collapsed into the Republic of China. In 1915, Russia and China signed the Kyatha agreement, making it autonomous. However, when the Russian Civil War broke out, China, working with Mongolian aristocrats, retook Mongolia in 1919. At the same time the Russian Civil War raged on and the White Army were, by 1921, beginning to lose to the Red Army. One of the commanders, Roman Ungern Von Sternberg, saw this and decided to abandon the White Army with his forces. He led his army into Mongolia in 1920, and conquered it completely by February 1921, putting Bogh Khan back into power.[20][21]

The Bolsheviks had been worried about Sternberg and, at the request of the Mongolian People's Party, invaded Mongolia in August 1921 helping with the Mongolian Revolution of 1921. The Soviets moved from many directions and captured many locations in the country. Sternberg fought back and marched into the USSR but he was captured and killed by the Soviets on September 15, 1921. The Soviets kept Bogd Khan in power, as a constitutional monarch, hoping to keep good relations with China, while continuing to occupy the country. However, when Bogd Khan died in 1924, the Mongolian Revolutionary government declared that no reincarnations shall be accepted and set up the People's Republic of Mongolia which would exist in power until 1992.[22]

1924: Romania

After the First World War, relations between Romania and the Soviet Union were quite tense. During the war, Romania had annexed Bessarabia and crushed the proclaimed Bessarabian Soviet Socialist Republic. Working with Romanian communists, the Soviet Union planned a takeover of the country. While the USSR had been asked not to be directly involved in the start of the revolt they supplied weapons to them across the border.[23][24] They planned to get involved once the revolt was in progress.[25] The plan would be to invade the countries from all directions, with the invasion divided into five zones: the North Zone, Bessarabia, the South-East Zone, Banat and Eastern Hungary.[26]

The revolt would begin on September 11 when individuals carried on boats attacked Nikolaievca.[27] The rebellion accelerated when, on September 15, the rebels seized the city hall in Tartarbunary and proclaimed the Moldavian Soviet Republic as Part of the Ukrainian SSR.[28] The Romanian government responded by sending in troops. On September 18, the troops took back Tartarbunary, and captured many of the rebels; some of the leaders were able to hide out and escape.[29] The rebellion would be crushed and many of the leaders were taken to court and tried.[25]

1929: Tannu Tuva

Location of the Tuvan People's Republic (modern boundaries)

After the fall of the Qing Dynasty, the province of Tannu Uriankhai became independent, and was then made a protectorate of the Russian empire. During the Russian Civil War, the Red Army created the Tuvan People's Republic. It was located in between Mongolia and the USSR and was only recognized by the two countries.[30] Their Prime Minister was Donduk Kuular, a former Lama with many ties to the Lamas present in the country.[31] He tried to put his country on a Theocratic and Nationalistic path, tried to sow closer ties with Mongolia, and made Buddhism the state religion.[32] He was also resistant to the collectivization policies of the Soviet Union. This was alarming and irritating to Joseph Stalin, the Soviet Union's leader.[33]

The Soviet Union would set the ground for a coup. They encouraged the "Revolutionary Union of Youth" movement, and educated many of them at Communist University of the Toilers of the East. In January 1929, five youths educated at the school would launch a coup with Soviet support and depose Kuular, imprisoning and later executing him. Salchak Toka would become the new head of the country. Under the new government, collectivization policies were implemented. A purge was launched in the country against aristocrats, Buddhists, intellectuals, and other political dissidents, which would also see the destruction of many monasteries.[34][35][36][37]

1929: Afghanistan

After the Third Anglo-Afghan War, Afghanistan had full independence from the British Empire, and could make their own foreign relations.[38] Amanullah Khan, the king of Afghanistan, made relations with the USSR, among many other countries, such as signing an agreement of neutrality.[39] There had also been another treaty signed that gave territory to Afghanistan on the condition that they stop Basmachi raids into the USSR.[40] As his reign continued, Amanullah Khan became less popular, and in November 1928 rebels rose up in the east of the country. The Saqqawists allowed Basmachi rebels from the Soviet Union to operate inside the country after coming to power.[41] The Soviet Union sent 1,000 troops into Afghanistan to support Amanullah Khan.[42] When Amanullah fled the country, the Red Army withdrew from Afghanistan.[42] Despite the Soviet withdrawal, the Saqqawists would be defeated later, in 1929.[43]

1930s

1934: Xinjiang

In 1934, Ma Zhongying's troops, supported by the Kuomintang government of the Republic of China, were on the verge of defeating the Soviet client Sheng Shicai during the Battle of Ürümqi (1933–34) in the Kumul Rebellion. As a Hui (Chinese Muslim), he had earlier attended the Whampoa Military Academy in Nanjing in 1929, when it was run by Chiang Kai-shek, who was also the head of the Kuomintang and leader of China.[4][5] He was then sent back to Gansu after graduating from the academy and fought in the Kumul Rebellion where, with the tacit support of the Kuomintang government of China, he tried to overthrow the pro-Soviet provincial government first led by Governor Jin Shuren, and then Sheng Shicai. Ma invaded Xinjiang in support of Kumul Khanate loyalists and received official approval and designation from the Kuomintang as the 36th Division.

Xinjiang in China

In late 1933, the Han Chinese provincial commander General Zhang Peiyuan and his army defected from the provincial government side to Zhongying's side and joined him in waging war against Jin Shuren's provincial government.

In 1934, two brigades of about 7,000 Soviet GPU troops, backed by tanks, airplanes and artillery with mustard gas, crossed the border to assist Sheng Shicai in gaining control of Xinjiang. The brigades were named "Altayiiskii" and "Tarbakhataiskii".[6] Sheng's Manchurian army was being severely beaten by an alliance of the Han Chinese army led by general Zhang Peiyuan, and the 36th Division led by Zhongying,[7] who fought under the banner of the Kuomintang Republic of China government. The joint Soviet-White Russian force was called "The Altai Volunteers". Soviet soldiers disguised themselves in uniforms lacking markings, and were dispersed among the White Russians.[8]

Despite his early successes, Zhang's forces were overrun at Kulja and Chuguchak, and he committed suicide after the battle at Muzart Pass to avoid capture.

Even though the Soviets were superior to the 36th Division in both manpower and technology, they were held off for weeks and took severe casualties. The 36th Division managed to halt the Soviet forces from supplying Sheng with military equipment. Chinese Muslim troops led by Ma Shih-ming held off the superior Red Army forces armed with machine guns, tanks, and planes for about 30 days.[9]

When reports that the Chinese forces had defeated and killed the Soviets reached Chinese prisoners in Ürümqi, they were reportedly so jubilant that they jumped around in their cells.[10]

Ma Hushan, Deputy Divisional Commander of the 36th Division, became well known for victories over Russian forces during the invasion.[11]

Chiang Kai-shek was ready to send Huang Shaohong and his expeditionary force which he assembled to assist Zhongying against Sheng, but when Chiang heard about the Soviet invasion, he decided to withdraw to avoid an international incident if his troops directly engaged the Soviets.[12]

1936–1939: Spain

The newly created Second Spanish Republic became tense with political divisions between right- and left-wing politics. The 1936 Spanish General Election would see the left wing coalition, called the Popular Front, win a narrow majority.[44] As a result, the right wing, known as Falange, launched a coup against the Republic, and while they would take much territory, they would fail at taking over Spain completely, beginning the Spanish Civil War.[45] There were two factions in the war: the right wing Nationalists, which included the Fascist Falange, Monarchists, Traditionalists, wealthy landowners, and Conservatives, who would eventually come to be led by Francisco Franco,[46] and the left wing Republicans, which included Anarchists, Socialists, Liberals, and Communists.[47]

The location of Spain

The Civil War would gain much international attention and both sides would gain foreign support through both volunteers and direct involvement. Both Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy gave overt support to the Nationalists. At the time, the USSR had an official policy of non-intervention, but wanted to counter Germany and Italy. Stalin worked around the League of Nations's embargo and provided arms to the Republicans and, unlike Germany and Italy, did this covertly.[48] Arms shipment was usually slow and ineffective and many weapons were lost,[49] but the Soviets would end up evading detection of the Nationalists by using false flags.[50] Despite Stalin's interest in aiding the Republicans, the quality of arms was inconsistent. Many rifles and field guns provided were old, obsolete or otherwise of limited use, (some dated back to the 1860s) but the T-26 and BT-5 tanks were modern and effective in combat.[51] The Soviet Union supplied aircraft that were in current service with their own forces but the aircraft provided by Germany to the Nationalists proved superior by the end of the war.[52] The USSR sent 2,000–3,000 military advisers to Spain, and while the Soviet commitment of troops was fewer than 500 men at a time, Soviet volunteers often operated Soviet-made tanks and aircraft, particularly at the beginning of the war.[53][54][55][56] The Republic paid for Soviet arms with official Bank of Spain gold reserves, 176 tonnes of which was transferred through France and 510 directly to Russia which was called Moscow gold.[57] At the same time, the Soviet Union directed Communist parties around the world to organize and recruit the International Brigades.[58]

At the same time, Stalin tried to take power within the Republicans. There were many anti-Stalin and anti-Soviet factions in the Republicans, such as Anarchists and Trotyskyists. Stalin encouraged NKVD (People's Commissariat for Internal Affairs) activity inside of the Republicans and Spain.

Catalan communist Andres Nin Perez, socialist journalist Mark Rein, left-wing academic Jose Robles, and others were assassinated in operations in Spain led by many spies and Stalinists such as Vittorio Vidali ("Comandante Contreras"), Iosif Grigulevich, Mikhail Koltsov and, most prominently, Aleksandr Mikhailovich Orlov. The NKVD also targeted Nationalists and others they saw as politically problematic to their goals.[59]

The Republicans eventually broke out into infighting between the communists and anarchists, as both groups attempted to form their own governments. The Nationalists, on the other hand, were much more unified than the Republicans, and Franco had been able to take most of Spain's territory, including Catalonia, an important area of left wing support and, with the collapse of Madrid, the war was over with a Nationalist victory.[60][61]

1939–1940: Finland

On 30 November 1939, the Soviet Union invaded Finland, three months after the outbreak of World War II, and ended three and a half months later with the Moscow Peace Treaty on 13 March 1940. The League of Nations deemed the attack illegal and expelled the Soviet Union from the organisation.

The location of Finland, in its region

The conflict began after the Soviets sought to obtain Finnish territory, demanding, among other concessions, that Finland cede substantial border territories in exchange for land elsewhere, claiming security reasons—primarily the protection of Leningrad, 32 km (20 mi) from the Finnish border. Finland refused, so the USSR invaded the country. Many sources conclude that the Soviet Union had intended to conquer all of Finland, and use the establishment of the puppet Finnish-Communist government and the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact's secret protocols as evidence of this.[F 8] Finland repelled Soviet attacks for more than two months and inflicted substantial losses on the invaders while temperatures ranged as low as −43 °C (−45 °F). After the Soviet military reorganised and adopted different tactics, they renewed their offensive in February and overcame Finnish defences.

Hostilities ceased in March 1940 with the signing of the Moscow Peace Treaty. Finland ceded 11 percent of its territory, representing 30 percent of its economy to the Soviet Union. Soviet losses were heavy, and the country's international reputation suffered. Soviet gains exceeded their pre-war demands and the USSR received substantial territory along Lake Ladoga and in northern Finland. Finland retained its sovereignty and enhanced its international reputation. The poor performance of the Red Army encouraged Adolf Hitler to think that an attack on the Soviet Union would be successful and confirmed negative Western opinions of the Soviet military. After 15 months of Interim Peace, in June 1941, Nazi Germany commenced Operation Barbarossa and the Continuation War between Finland and the USSR began.

1940s

1940: Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania

Planned and actual divisions of Europe, according to the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact, with later adjustments

The Soviet Union occupied the Baltic states under the auspices of the 1939 Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact in June 1940.[62][63] They were then incorporated into the Soviet Union as constituent republics in August 1940, though most Western powers never recognized their incorporation.[64][65] On 22 June 1941, Nazi Germany attacked the Soviet Union and, within weeks, occupied the Baltic territories. In July 1941, the Third Reich incorporated the Baltic territory into its Reichskommissariat Ostland. As a result of the Red Army's Baltic Offensive of 1944, the Soviet Union recaptured most of the Baltic states and trapped the remaining German forces in the Courland pocket until their formal surrender in May 1945.[66] The Soviet "annexation occupation" (German: Annexionsbesetzung) or occupation sui generis[67] of the Baltic states lasted until August 1991, when the three countries regained their independence.

The Baltic states themselves,[68][69] the United States[70][71] and its courts of law,[72] the European Parliament,[73][74][75] the European Court of Human Rights[76] and the United Nations Human Rights Council[77] have all stated that these three countries were invaded, occupied and illegally incorporated into the Soviet Union under provisions[78] of the 1939 Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact. There followed occupation by Nazi Germany from 1941 to 1944 and then again occupation by the Soviet Union from 1944 to 1991.[79][80][81][82][83][84][85][86] This policy of non-recognition has given rise to the principle of legal continuity of the Baltic states, which holds that de jure, or as a matter of law, the Baltic states had remained independent states under illegal occupation throughout the period from 1940 to 1991.[87][88][89]

In its reassessment of Soviet history that began during perestroika in 1989, the Soviet Union condemned the 1939 secret protocol between Germany and itself.[90] However, the Soviet Union never formally acknowledged its presence in the Baltics as an occupation or that it annexed these states[91] and considered the Estonian, Latvian and Lithuanian Soviet Socialist Republics as three of its constituent republics. On the other hand, the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic recognized in 1991 that the events of 1940 were "annexation[s]".[92] Nationalist-patriotic[93] Russian historiography and school textbooks continue to maintain that the Baltic states voluntarily joined the Soviet Union after their peoples all carried out socialist revolutions independent of Soviet influence.[94] The post-Soviet government of the Russian Federation and its state officials insist that incorporation of the Baltic states was in accordance with international law[95][96] and gained de jure recognition by the agreements made in the February 1945 Yalta and the July–August 1945 Potsdam conferences and by the 1975 Helsinki Accords,[97][98] which declared the inviolability of existing frontiers.[99] However, Russia agreed to Europe's demand to "assist persons deported from the occupied Baltic states" upon joining the Council of Europe in 1996.[100][101][102] Additionally, when the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic signed a separate treaty with Lithuania in 1991, it acknowledged that the 1940 annexation as a violation of Lithuanian sovereignty and recognized the de jure continuity of the Lithuanian state.[103][104]

Most Western governments maintained that Baltic sovereignty had not been legitimately overridden[105] and thus continued to recognise the Baltic states as sovereign political entities represented by the legations—appointed by the pre-1940 Baltic states—which functioned in Washington and elsewhere.[106][107] The Baltic states recovered de facto independence in 1991 during the dissolution of the Soviet Union. Russia started to withdraw its troops from the Baltics (starting from Lithuania) in August 1993. The full withdrawal of troops deployed by Moscow ended in August 1994.[108] Russia officially ended its military presence in the Baltics in August 1998 by decommissioning the Skrunda-1 radar station in Latvia. The dismantled installations were repatriated to Russia and the site returned to Latvian control, with the last Russian soldier leaving Baltic soil in October 1999.[109][110]

1941–1953: World War II, formation of the East Bloc, creation of Soviet satellite states, and the last years of Stalin's rule

The Soviet Union policy during World War II was neutral until August 1939, followed by friendly relations with Germany in order to carve up Eastern Europe. The USSR helped supply oil and munitions to Germany as its armies rolled across Western Europe in May–June 1940. Despite repeated warnings, Stalin refused to believe that Hitler was planning an all-out war on the USSR;[111] he was stunned and temporarily helpless when Hitler invaded in June 1941. Stalin quickly came to terms with Britain and the United States, cemented through a series of summit meetings. The two countries supplied war materials in large quantity through Lend Lease.[112] There was some coordination of military action, especially in summer 1944.[113][114]

As agreed with the Allies at the Tehran Conference in November 1943 and the Yalta Conference in February 1945, the Soviet Union entered World War II's Pacific Theater within three months of the end of the war in Europe. The invasion began on 9 August 1945, exactly three months after the German surrender on May 8 (9 May, 0:43 Moscow time). Although the commencement of the invasion fell between the American atomic bombing of Hiroshima, on 6 August, and only hours before the Nagasaki bombing on 9 August, the timing of the invasion had been planned well in advance and was determined by the timing of the agreements at Tehran and Yalta, the long-term buildup of Soviet forces in the Far East since Tehran, and the date of the German surrender some three months earlier; on August 3, Marshal Vasilevsky reported to Premier Joseph Stalin that, if necessary, he could attack on the morning of 5 August. At 11pm Trans-Baikal (UTC+10) time on 8 August 1945, Soviet foreign minister Vyacheslav Molotov informed Japanese ambassador Naotake Satō that the Soviet Union had declared war on Japan, and that from 9 August the Soviet government would consider itself to be at war with Japan.[115]

1940s

The location of Iran, in its region

1941: Iran

The British Commonwealth and the Soviet Union invaded Iran jointly in 1941 during the Second World War. The invasion lasted from 25 August to 17 September 1941 and was codenamed Operation Countenance. Its purpose was to secure Iranian oil fields and ensure Allied supply lines (see the Persian Corridor) for the USSR, fighting against Axis forces on the Eastern Front. Though Iran was neutral, the Allies considered Reza Shah to be friendly to Germany, deposed him during the subsequent occupation and replaced him with his young son Mohammad Reza Pahlavi.[116]

1944-1947: Romania

Location of Romania

As World War II turned against the Axis and the Soviet Union won on the Eastern Front, Romanian politician, Iuliu Maniu, entered secret negotiations with the Allies.[117] At the time Romania was ruled over by the fascist Iron Guard, with the king as a figurehead. The Romanians had contributed a large number of troops to the front, and had hoped to regain territory and survive.[118] After the Soviets launched a successful offensive into Romania Romanian King Michael I met with the National Democratic Bloc to try and take over the government. King Michael I tried to get the leader of the Iron Guard, Ion Antonescu, to switch sides but he refused. So the King immediately ordered his arrest and took over the government in a coup.[119] Romania switched sides and began fighting against the Axis.[120]

However the Soviet Union still ended up occupying the country, and Stalin still wanted the country to fall under his influence.[120] He ordered the King to appoint Petru Groza, the communist candidate, as the Prime Minister in March 1945.[121][122] At the same time the communist party set up the 1946 Romanian General Election, and fraudulently won it.[123] The King, like with the Iron Guard, only ruled as a figurehead, and the communists took control of the country.[124] In the 1947 the Paris Peace Treaties allowed Red Army troops to continue to occupy the country. As well in 1947 communists forced the King to abdicate and leave the country, and afterwards abolishing the monarchy.[125][126] The communists declared Socialist Republic of Romania in Bucharest, which was friendly and aligned with Moscow. The Soviet occupation of Romania continued until 1958.

1944-1946: Bulgaria

Location of Bulgaria

The Kingdom of Bulgaria has originally joined the Axis to gain territory and be protected from the USSR. As well Bulgaria wanted to fend off communists in the country, who had influence in the army. Despite this Bulgaria did not participate in the war very much, not joining in either Operation Barbarosa and refusing to send its Jewish Population to concentration camps.[127] However, in 1943 Tsar Boris III died, and the Axis were starting to lose on the Eastern Front. The Bulgarian government negotiated with the allies and withdrew from the war in August 1944. Despite this they refused to expel the German troops still stationed in the country. The Soviet Union responded by invading the country in September 1944, which coincided with the 1944 coup by communists.[128] The coup saw the communist Fatherland Front take power.[129] The new government abolished the monarchy and executed former officials of the government including 1,000 to 3,000 dissidents, war criminals, and monarchists in the People's Court, as well as exilling Tsar Simeon II.[130][131][132] Following a referendum in 1946 the People's Republic of Bulgaria was set up under the leadership of Georgi Dimitrov.[133][134]

1944–1946: Poland

The location of Poland

On 17 September 1939, the Soviet Union invaded Poland from the east, sixteen days after Germany invaded Poland from the west. Subsequent military operations lasted for the following 20 days and ended on 6 October 1939 with the two-way division and annexation of the entire territory of the Second Polish Republic by Germany and the Soviet Union.[135] The Soviet invasion of Poland was secretly approved by Germany following the signing of the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact on 23 August 1939.[136]

The Red Army, which vastly outnumbered the Polish defenders, achieved its targets encountering only limited resistance. Roughly 320,000 Polish prisoners of war had been captured.[137][138] The campaign of mass persecution in the newly acquired areas began immediately. In November 1939 the Soviet government ostensibly annexed the entire Polish territory under its control. Around 13.5 million Polish citizens who fell under the military occupation were made into new Soviet subjects following show elections conducted by the NKVD secret police in the atmosphere of terror,[139][140] the results of which were used to legitimize the use of force. A Soviet campaign of political murders and other forms of repression, targeting Polish figures of authority such as military officers, police and priests, began with a wave of arrests and summary executions.[141][142][143] The Soviet NKVD sent hundreds of thousands of people from eastern Poland to Siberia and other remote parts of the Soviet Union in four major waves of deportation between 1939 and 1941.[Note 1]

Soviet forces occupied eastern Poland until the summer of 1941, when they were driven out by the German army in the course of Operation Barbarossa. The area was under German occupation until the Red Army reconquered it in the summer of 1944. An agreement at the Yalta Conference permitted the Soviet Union to annex almost all of their Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact portion of the Second Polish Republic, compensating the People's Republic of Poland with the southern half of East Prussia and territories east of the Oder–Neisse line.[146] The Soviet Union enclosed most of the conquered annexed territories into the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic and the Byelorussian Soviet Socialist Republic.[146]

After the end of World War II in Europe, the USSR signed a new border agreement with the Soviet-backed and installed Polish communist puppet state on 16 August 1945. This agreement recognized the status quo as the new official border between the two countries with the exception of the region around Białystok and a minor part of Galicia east of the San river around Przemyśl, which were later returned to Poland.[147]

1945-1949: Hungary

As the allies were on their way to victory in World War II, Hungary was governed by the Hungarist Arrow Cross Party under the Government of National Unity. They were facing mostly advancing Soviet and Romanian forces. On February 13, 1945 the forces captured Budapest, by April 1945 German forces were driven out of the country.[148] They occupied the country and set it up as a Satellite State called the Second Hungarian Republic. In the 1945 Hungarian Parliamentary Election the Independent Smallholders Party won 57% of the vote while the communists won only 17%. In response the Soviet forces refused to allow the party to take power, and the communists took control of the government in a coup. Their rule saw the Stalinization of the country, and with the help of the USSR sent dissidents to Gulags in the Soviet Union, as well as setting up the Security Police known as the State Protection Authority (AVO).[149][150] In February 1947 the police began targeting member of the Independent Smallholders Party and the National Peasants Party. As well in 1947 the Hungarian government forced the leaders of non communist parties to cooperate with the government. The Social Democratic Party was taken over while the Secretary of Independent Smallholders Party was sent to Siberia. In June 1948 the Social Democrats were forced to fuse with the communists to form the Hungarian Working People's Party.[151] In the 1949 Hungarian parliamentary elections the voters were only presented with a list of communist candidates and the Hungarian government drafted a new constitution from the 1936 Soviet Constitution, and made themselves into the People's Republic of Hungary with Matyas Rakosi as the de facto leader.[152][152]

1945: Germany

Soviet advances from 1 January 1945 to 11 May 1945:
  to 30 March 1945
  to 11 May 1945

The Soviet Union entered Warsaw on 17 January 1945, after the city was destroyed and abandoned by the Germans. Over three days, on a broad front incorporating four army fronts, the Red Army launched the Vistula–Oder Offensive across the Narew River and from Warsaw. The Soviets outnumbered the Germans on average by 5–6:1 in troops, 6:1 in artillery, 6:1 in tanks and 4:1 in self-propelled artillery. After four days, the Red Army broke out and started moving thirty to forty kilometres a day, taking the Baltic states: Danzig, East Prussia and Poznań, and drawing up on a line sixty kilometres east of Berlin along the River Oder. During the full course of the Vistula–Oder operation (23 days), the Red Army forces sustained 194,191 total casualties (killed, wounded and missing) and lost 1,267 tanks and assault guns.

A limited counter-attack (codenamed Operation Solstice) by the newly created Army Group Vistula, under the command of Reichsführer-SS Heinrich Himmler, had failed by 24 February, and the Red Army drove on to Pomerania and cleared the right bank of the Oder River. In the south, the German attempts in to relieve the encircled garrison at Budapest (codenamed Operation Konrad) failed and the city fell on 13 February. On 6 March, the Germans launched what would be their final major offensive of the war, Operation Spring Awakening, which failed by 16 March. On 30 March, the Red Army entered Austria and captured Vienna on 13 April.

OKW claimed German losses of 77,000 killed, 334,000 wounded and 292,000 missing, for a total of 703,000 men, on the Eastern Front during January and February 1945.[153]

On 9 April 1945, Königsberg in East Prussia finally fell to the Red Army, although the shattered remnants of Army Group Centre continued to resist on the Vistula Spit and Hel Peninsula until the end of the war in Europe. The East Prussian operation, though often overshadowed by the Vistula–Oder operation and the later battle for Berlin, was in fact one of the largest and costliest operations fought by the Red Army throughout the war. During the period it lasted (13 January – 25 April), it cost the Red Army 584,788 casualties, and 3,525 tanks and assault guns.

The fall of Königsberg allowed Stavka to free up General Konstantin Rokossovsky's 2nd Belorussian Front (2BF) to move west to the east bank of the Oder. During the first two weeks of April, the Red Army performed their fastest front redeployment of the war. General Georgy Zhukov concentrated his 1st Belorussian Front (1BF), which had been deployed along the Oder river from Frankfurt in the south to the Baltic, into an area in front of the Seelow Heights. The 2BF moved into the positions being vacated by the 1BF north of the Seelow Heights. While this redeployment was in progress gaps were left in the lines and the remnants of the German 2nd Army, which had been bottled up in a pocket near Danzig, managed to escape across the Oder. To the south, General Ivan Konev shifted the main weight of the 1st Ukrainian Front (1UF) out of Upper Silesia north-west to the Neisse River.[154] The three Soviet fronts had altogether around 2.5 million men (including 78,556 soldiers of the 1st Polish Army): 6,250 tanks, 7,500 aircraft, 41,600 artillery pieces and mortars, 3,255 truck-mounted Katyusha rocket launchers, (nicknamed "Stalin Organs"), and 95,383 motor vehicles, many of which were manufactured in the USA.[154]

1945-1950: China

On 9 August 1945, the Soviet Union invaded the Japanese puppet state of Manchukuo. It was the last campaign of the Second World War, and the largest of the 1945 Soviet–Japanese War, which resumed hostilities between the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and the Empire of Japan after almost six years of peace. Soviet gains on the continent were Manchukuo, Mengjiang (Inner Mongolia) and northern Korea. The Soviet entry into the war and the defeat of the Kwantung Army was a significant factor in the Japanese government's decision to surrender unconditionally, as it made apparent the Soviet Union had no intention of acting as a third party in negotiating an end to hostilities on conditional terms.[155][156][157][158][159][160][161][162]

At the same time tensions were starting to resurface between the Communist Party of China (CPC) and the Kuomintang (KMT), known as the Communists and Nationalists respectively. The two groups had stopped fighting to form the Second United Front in order to fend off the Japanese Empire. During the Second Sino-Japanese War the CPC gained many members due to their success against the Japanese. The fighting even caused the United Front to be dissolved in 1941.[163] Through the war with the Japanese there were tensions and incidents of fighting, however the USSR and the USA made sure that they stayed at enough peace to stop the Japanese from winning the war.[164] In March 1946 the USSR would withdraw leaving most of Manchuria to the Communists. As well the USSR handed over most of the weapons to the CPC that they had captured from the Japanese.[165][166] Fighting commenced between the two groups and a war began that would last for three years.[167]

The Communists were able to start gaining ground and by 1948 they were pushing the Nationalists out and taking more and more of China. The USSR continued to give aid to the CPC and even helped them in taking Xinjiang from the Nationalists.[168] In October 1949 Mao Zedong, the leader of the communists, proclaimed the People's Republic of China effectively ending the civil war. In May 1950 the last of the KMT had been completely pushed off of mainland China and Chiang Kai-Shek, the leader of the Nationalists, retreated to Taiwan and formed the Republic of China.[169] Both mainland China and the USSR stayed good allies until the Sino-Soviet Split after Stalin's death.

1945–1953: Korea

Korea in its region

The 1948 Korean elections were overseen primarily by the United Nations Temporary Commission on Korea, or UNTCOK. The Soviet Union forbade the elections in the north of the peninsula,[170] while the United States planned to hold separate elections in the south of the peninsula, a plan which was opposed by Australia, Canada and Syria as members of the commission.[171] According to Gordenker, the commission acted:

in such a way as to affect the controlling political decisions regarding elections in Korea. Moreover, UNTCOK deliberately and directly took a hand in the conduct of the 1948 election.[172]

Faced with this, UNTCOK eventually recommended the election take place only in the south, but that the results would be binding on all of Korea.[170]

In June 1950, Kim Il-sung's North Korean People's Army invaded South Korea.[58] Fearing that communist Korea under a Kim Il-sung dictatorship could threaten Japan and foster other communist movements in Asia, Harry Truman, then President of the United States, committed U.S. forces and obtained help from the United Nations to counter the North Korean invasion. The Soviets boycotted UN Security Council meetings while protesting the Council's failure to seat the People's Republic of China and, thus, did not veto the Council's approval of UN action to oppose the North Korean invasion. A joint UN force of personnel from South Korea, the United States, Britain, Turkey, Canada, Australia, France, the Philippines, the Netherlands, Belgium, New Zealand and other countries joined to stop the invasion.[59] After a Chinese invasion to assist the North Koreans, fighting stabilized along the 38th parallel, which had separated the Koreas. The Korean Armistice Agreement was signed in July 1953 after the death of Stalin, who had been insisting that the North Koreans continue fighting.[60]

1948: Czechoslovakia

Following World War II, Czechoslovakia was under the influence of the USSR and, during the election of 1946, the communists would win 38% of the vote.[173] The communists had been alienating many citizens in Czechoslovakia due to the use of the police force and talks of collectivization of a number of industries.[174] Stalin was against democratic ways of taking power since the communist parties in Italy and France had failed to take power. In the winter of 1947, the communist party decided to stage a coup; the USSR would come to support them. The non-communists attempted to act before the communists took the police force completely, but the communists occupied the offices of non-communists.[175] The army, under the direction of Defence Minister Ludvík Svoboda, who was formally non-partisan but had facilitated communist infiltration into the officer corps, was confined to barracks and did not interfere.[176] The communists threatened a general strike too. Edvard Benes, fearing direct Soviet intervention and a civil war, surrendered and resigned.[177]

1948–1949: Yugoslavia

The location of Yugoslavia

During World War II, the communist Yugoslav Partisans had been the main resistance to the Axis in Yugoslavia. As the axis were defeated the Partisans took power and Josef Bronz Tito became the head of Yugoslavia. This had been done without much Soviet help, so Tito was allowed to and did run his own path in defiance to Stalin. Economically, he implemented a different view to the USSR[178] and attempted to make Yugoslavia into a regional power by absorbing Bulgaria and Albania into Yugoslavia as well as funding the Greek Communists in the Greek Civil War, in order to absorb Greece too.[179] Stalin did not approve of this and expelled Yugoslavia from the East Bloc. There was military buildup and a planned invasion in 1949 that was never put through.[180] As well, since 1945, the USSR had a spy ring within Yugoslavia[181] and Stalin attempted to assassinate Tito several times. Stalin remarked "I will shake my little finger and there will be no more Tito".[182] However, these assassinations would fail, and Tito would write back to Stalin "Stop sending people to kill me. We've already captured five of them, one of them with a bomb and another with a rifle. [...] If you don't stop sending killers, I'll send one to Moscow, and I won't have to send a second."[183] Yugoslavia would go on to become one of the main founders and leaders the Non-Aligned Movement.[184]

1948: Italy

Italy's location in its region

In the 1948 Italian elections, described as an "apocalyptic test of strength between communism and democracy,"[185] the Soviet Union funneled as much as $10 million monthly to the communists parties and leveraged its influence on Italian companies via contracts to support them,[186] while the Truman administration and the Roman Catholic Church funneled millions of dollars in funding to the Christian Democracy party and other parties through the War Powers Act of 1941 in addition to supplying military advisers, in preparation for a potential civil war.[185][187]:107–8 Christian Democrats eventually won with a majority.[187]:108–9

1953–1991: Rest of the Cold War

1950s

1956: Hungary

The location of Hungary

After Stalinist dictator Mátyás Rákosi was replaced by Imre Nagy following Stalin's death[44][not in citation given] and Polish reformist Władysław Gomułka was able to enact some reformist requests,[45] large numbers of protesting Hungarians compiled a list of Demands of Hungarian Revolutionaries of 1956,[46] including free secret-ballot elections, independent tribunals, and inquiries into Stalin and Rákosi Hungarian activities. Under the orders of Soviet defense minister Georgy Zhukov, Soviet tanks entered Budapest.[47]Protester attacks at the Parliament forced the collapse of the government.[48]

The new government that came to power during the revolution formally disbanded the Hungarian secret police, declared its intention to withdraw from the Warsaw Pact and pledged to re-establish free elections. The Soviet Politburo thereafter moved to crush the revolution with a large Soviet force invading Budapest and other regions of the country.[49] Approximately 200,000 Hungarians fled Hungary,[50] some 26,000 Hungarians were put on trial by the new Soviet-installed János Kádár government and, of those, 13,000 were imprisoned.[51] Imre Nagy was executed, along with Pál Maléter and Miklós Gimes, after secret trials in June 1958. By January 1957, the Hungarian government had suppressed all public opposition. These Hungarian government's violent oppressive actions alienated many Western Marxists,[who?] yet strengthened communist control in all the European communist states, cultivating the perception that communism was both irreversible and monolithic.

1960s

1960: United States

Adlai Stevenson II had been the Democratic presidential nominee in 1952 and 1956, and the Soviets offered him propaganda support if he ran again for president in 1960, but Stevenson declined.[188] Instead, Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev backed John F. Kennedy in a very close election against Richard Nixon, with whom Khrushchev had clashed in the 1959 Kitchen Debate.[189] On July 1, 1960, a Soviet MiG-19 shot down an American RB-47H reconnaissance aircraft in the international airspace over the Barents Sea with four of the crew being killed and two captured by the Soviets: John R. McKone and Freeman B. Olmstead.[190] The Soviets held on to the two prisoners, in order to avoid giving Nixon (who was the incumbent Vice-President of the United States) an opportunity to boast about his ability to work with the Soviets, and the two Air Force officers were released days after Kennedy's inauguration, on January 25, 1961. Khrushchev later bragged that Kennedy acknowledged the Soviet help: "You're right. I admit you played a role in the election and cast your vote for me...."[189] Former Soviet ambassador to the United States Oleg Troyanovsky confirmed Kennedy's acknowledgment, but also quoted Kennedy doubting whether the Soviet support made a difference: "I don't think it affected the elections in any way."[189][191]

1961–1965: Congo-Leopoldville

The Simba Rebellion (red) and The Kwilu Rebellion (orange) in Congo-Leopoldville

In 1960, Belgium, the United States, and other countries covertly overthrew Prime Minister Patrice Lumumba in a coup lead by Mobutu Sese Seko. Afterwards, Seko began getting support from the US. Many politicians who had been allied to Lumumba were forced out of government. Many of Lumumba allied politicians began to foment discontent and dissent. They formed a new government in Stanleyville in the East of the country called the Free Republic of Congo with the support of the Soviet Union. The supporters of Lumumba eventually agreed to join back however they felt cheated on after and turned again against Mobutu in a more violent form of resistance. Maoist Pierre Mulele began the Kwilu Rebellion, soon after Christopher Gbenye and Gaston Soumialot led the APL (Armée Populaire de Libération), also known as the Simbas, in the Eastern Congo in the Simba Rebellion.[192]

Mobutu was already receiving assistance from the United States, and the Simbas began to receive funding from the USSR along with other countries also aligned with them. The Soviet Union implored neighboring nationalistic governments to aid the rebels. The Soviet leadership promised that it would replace all weaponry given to the Simbas but rarely did so.[193] In order to supply the rebels, the Soviet Union transported equipment by cargo planes to Juba in allied Sudan. From there, the Sudanese brought the weapons to Congo.[194] This operation backfired, however, as southern Sudan was invaded in the First Sudanese Civil War. The Sudanese Anyanya insurgents consequently ambushed the Soviet-Sudanese supply convoies, and took the weapons for themselves.[195][194] When the CIA learned of these attacks, it allied with the Anyanya. The Anyanya helped the Western and Congolese air forces locate and destroy Simba rebel camps and supply routes.[196] In return, the Sudanese rebels were given weapons for their own war.[197] Angered by the Soviet support for the insurgents, the Congolese government expelled the Soviet embassy's personnel from the country in July 1964. The Soviet leadership responded by increasing its aid for the Simbas.[193] As well in 1965 Che Guevara went and fought alongside future leader of the Democratic Republic of Congo, Laurent-Desire Kabila.[198]

However the rebellion would begin to collapse for a variety of reasons including bad coordination and relations with the USSR, the Sino-Soviet Split, support for Mobutu by the U.S. and Belgium, counter insurgent tactics, and many other reasons.[199][200][201] While it would be crushed the Simbas still held parts of the Eastern Congo and resisted the government until 1996 during the First Congo War.[202]

1964: Chile

Chile's location


Between 1960 and 1969, the Soviet government funded the Communist Party of Chile at a rate of between $50,000 and $400,000 annually. In the 1964 Chilean elections, the U.S. government supplied $2.6 million in funding for candidate Eduardo Frei Montalva, whose opponent, Salvador Allende was a prominent Marxist, as well as additional funding with the intention of harming Allende's reputation.[203]:38–9 As Gustafson phrased the situation:

It was clear the Soviet Union was operating in Chile to ensure Marxist success, and from the contemporary American point of view, the United States was required to thwart this enemy influence: Soviet money and influence were clearly going into Chile to undermine its democracy, so U.S. funding would have to go into Chile to frustrate that pernicious influence.

1965–1979: Rhodesia

Location of Rhodesia, today the Republic of Zimbabwe

By the end of the nineteenth Century, the British Empire had control of much of Southern Africa. This included the three colonies of Northern Rhodesia and Southern Rhodesia, named for Cecil Rhodes, and Nyasaland, which formed the Federation of Rhodesia and Nyasaland. Northern Rhodesia would go on to become independent as Zambia and Nyasaland would become Malawi.[204] A white minority had ruled Southern Rhodesia since World War II. However, the British had made a policy of majority rule as a condition of independence, and Southern Rhodesia's white minority still wanted to maintain power.[205][206][207] On November 11, 1965, Southern Rhodesia declared independence and formed Rhodesia.[208][209][210]

In Rhodesia, the white minority still held political power and held most of the country's wealth, while being lead by Ian Smith. Rhodesia would gain very little recognition across the world, though it would have some covert support. Two main armed groups rose up in order to overthrow the white minority in 1964, a year before Rhodesia's declaration of independence. Both were Marxist organizations that got support from different sides of the Sino-Soviet Split. One was ZANU (Zimbabwe African National Union), who organized rural areas, and thus got support from China. The other was ZAPU (Zimbabwe African People's Union), who organized primarily urban areas, thus getting support from the USSR. ZIPRA (Zimbabwe People's Revolutionary Army), the armed wing of ZAPU, took advice from its Soviet instructors in formulating its vision and strategy of popular revolution. About 1,400 Soviets, 700 East German and 500 Cuban instructors were deployed to the area.[211] While both groups fought against the Rhodesian government, they would also sometimes fight each other. The fighting began a year before Rhodesian independence.

Rhodesia was not able to survive the war as into the 1970s guerilla activity began to intensify.[212][213] Eventually, a compromise was reached in 1978 where the country was renamed Zimbabwe-Rhodesia. This was still seen as not enough and the war would continue.[214] Then, after a brief British recolonization, Zimbabwe was created, with ZANU leader Robert Mugabe elected as president.[215] In the 1980 election, ZAPU would not win a majority; they would later fuse with ZANU in 1987 into ZANU-PF. They are now split.[216][217]

Location of Czechoslovakia

1968: Czechoslovakia

A period of political liberalization took place in 1968 in Czechoslovakia called the Prague Spring. The event was spurred by several events, including economic reforms that addressed an early 1960s economic downturn.[218][219] In April, Czechoslovakian leader Alexander Dubček launched an "Action Program" of liberalizations, which included increasing freedom of the press, freedom of speech and freedom of movement, along with an economic emphasis on consumer goods, the possibility of a multiparty government and limiting the power of the secret police.[220][221] Initial reaction within the Eastern Bloc was mixed, with Hungary's János Kádár expressing support, while Soviet leader Leonid Brezhnev and others grew concerned about Dubček's reforms, which they feared might weaken the Eastern Bloc's position during the Cold War.[222][223] On August 3, representatives from the Soviet Union, East Germany, Poland, Hungary, Bulgaria, and Czechoslovakia met in Bratislava and signed the Bratislava Declaration, which declaration affirmed unshakable fidelity to Marxism-Leninism and proletarian internationalism and declared an implacable struggle against "bourgeois" ideology and all "anti-socialist" forces.[224]

On the night of August 20–21, 1968, Eastern Bloc armies from four Warsaw Pact countries – the Soviet Union, Bulgaria, Poland and Hungaryinvaded Czechoslovakia.[225][226] The invasion comported with the Brezhnev Doctrine, a policy of compelling Eastern Bloc states to subordinate national interests to those of the Bloc as a whole and the exercise of a Soviet right to intervene if an Eastern Bloc country appeared to shift towards capitalism.[227][228] The invasion was followed by a wave of emigration, including an estimated 70,000 Czechs initially fleeing, with the total eventually reaching 300,000.[229] In April 1969, Dubček was replaced as first secretary by Gustáv Husák, and a period of "normalization" began.[230] Husák reversed Dubček's reforms, purged the party of liberal members, dismissed opponents from public office, reinstated the power of the police authorities, sought to re-centralize the economy and re-instated the disallowance of political commentary in mainstream media and by persons not considered to have "full political trust".[231][232] The international image of the Soviet Union suffered considerably, especially among Western student movements inspired by the "New Left" and non-Aligned Movement states. Mao Zedong's People's Republic of China, for example, condemned both the Soviets and the Americans as imperialists.

1970s

1974-1990: Ethiopia

Ethiopia pre-Eritrean Independence

Emperor Haile Selassie I of the Ethiopian Empire was continuing to hold onto power in the country and to protect the feudal system that held the country together. The empire had lasted thousands of years and into the 1950s and 1960s it was starting to become more unstable. The people in the country had suffered through famines that the government had been unable or refused to alleviate such as the 1958 Famine of Tigray and especially the Wollo Famine from 1972 to 1974.[233][234] The emperor set up the Derg to investigate how rations were handed out, but were given more power and supported munitys among the soldiers. They eventually turned against the emperor. They led the overthrow of the emperor on September 12, 1974 in the Ethiopian revolution.[235] The Derg soon after abolished the monarchy and ended the empire. The leader of the Derg was Mengistu Haile Mariam. He became a Marxist-Leninist and the Derg came to rule Ethiopia as a Marxist-Leninist military Junta.[236] The Soviet Union supported him and the Derg, and they began to supply him weapons and portray him positively. He than tried to model Ethiopia off of the Eastern European members of the Warsaw Pact.[237]

As this occurred many other leftist, separatist, and anti communist groups rose up, beginning the Ethiopian Civil War. Among the groups was the conservative Ethiopion Democratic Union (EDU). They represented landowners who were opposed to the Nationalization policies of the Derg, monarchists, and high-ranking military officers who were forced out by mutineers of the Derg. As well there were a number of dissenting Marxist-Leninist groups opposed the Derg for ideological reasons. These were the Ethiopian People's Revolutionary Party (EPRP), Tigray People's Liberation Front (TPLF), Ethiopian People's Democratic Movement (EPDM), and All-Ethiopia Socialist Movement (MEISON). The Derg had to contend with all of these along with many separatist organizations and an invasion by Somalia. The Soviet Union supported the Derg government.[238][239][240] The Derg with that support instigated the Qey Shibir (Ethiopian Red Terror), targeted especially against the EPRP and MEISON.[241] Thousands were killed by the Qey Shibir, as well as forced deportations.[242][243] As well the brutal 1983-1985 famine hit the country, which was vastly extended by government policies.[244]

In 1987 the Derg formed the People's Democratic Republic of Ethiopia (PDRE), and continued suppressing rebel groups, and Mariam attempted to transition to a socialist republic. In 1989 the TPLF and EPDM fused into the Ethiopian People's Revolutionary Democratic Front (EPRDF), and it along with Eritrean separatists began to gain ground and victories.[245] In 1990 as the Eastern Bloc began to collapse the USSR stopped any aid and supplies to Ethiopia. A year later Mengistu Haile Mariam fled the country, as the PDRE fell to the rebels.[246]

1975-1991: Angola

Angola for hundreds of years was a colony of the Portuguese Empire. However, in the 1960s various Angolan rebel groups rose up in what became the Angolan War of Independence. Among the revolting groups was the leftist rebel group People's Movement for the Liberation of Angola (MPLA). After the Carnation Revolution Portugal promised independence to its colonies including Angola. This lead the various rebel groups, that had already been opposed to one another, to increase fighting among them. They signed the Alvor Agreement with Portugal giving them independence.[247] At this point the MPLA controlled most of the country and was advancing against other groups opposed to it like the National Liberation Front of Angola (FNLA) and the National Union for the Total Independence of Angola (UNITA). In response South Africa, which was still under Apartheid, invaded the country to stop the MPLA in 1975. At the same time the Soviet Union began sending troops and arms to the MPLA alongside several other countries especially Cuba. The Soviet Union went on to send 11,000 troops total throughout their entire involvement in the civil war.[248][249] The MPLA ruled as the internationally recognized government with Agostinho Neto as the first country's president.

Location of Angola

In 1977 the MPLA went on to adopt Marxist-Leninism as their official ideology at their first congress.[250] Despite this Neto pushed his party toward socialism as opposed to communism. This caused a movement to develop inside the party known as Fractionism, which attempted to make the party more heavily Marxist-Leninist. This resulted in Nito Alves, the main proponent of Fractionism, to attempt a coup in 1977 against Neto. The coup was a failure and Nito Alves was executed. Than with the assistance of Cuba and the USSR the MPLA suppressed opposition including Fractionists. Neto specifically ordered the killing of followers and sympathizers to "orthodox communism".[251] In 1978 the FNLA ended its fighting and faded from the fighting. In 1979 Neto died in a Moscow hospital and Jose Eduardo dos Santos was elected president of Angola, as the country's Commander in Chief of the armed forces. In 1980 he was further elected President's of the People's Assembly.[252]

As well from 1981 to 1986 the Soviet Union gave massive military aid to the MPLA along with over $2 Billion in financial aid.[253][254] In 1986 the Soviet Union gave an additional $1 Billion.[255]

As the war dragged on the MPLA began to push against UNITA even as they received support from the US and other countries. This eventually lead to the UNITA under Jonas Savimbi to start negotiating with Santos in April 1991, mediated by the US, USSR, and Portugal.[256] This led to the Bicesse Accords between UNITA and the MPLA on May 31, 1991 signed in Lisbon.[257] They agreed to hold elections in which both ran as parties while South Africa agreed to withdraw and give Namibia independence. The USSR collapsed December of that year and was no longer involved in the war. Despite this the war heated up again the following year after the 1992 Angolan General Election and continued until 2002.

Location of Cambodia

1978-1989: Cambodia

In the years after the Vietnam War the Socialist Republic of Vietnam and the Democratic Kampuchea had been trying to build relations between one another. The Democratic Kampuchea was the government of Cambodia under the rule of Pol Pot and the Khmer Rouge. While both countries tried to maintain good relations they both were still suspicious of each other and fought in occasional border skirmishes. In 1977 relations fully deteriorated, and in 1978 this would all come to a head. On December 25, 1978 Vietnam invaded the country in order to remove the Khmer Rouge from power. Their invasion was supported by the Soviet Union who ended up sending them $1.4 billion in military aid for their invasion, and between 1981-1985 peaked at $1.7 billion.[258] As well the Soviet Union provided Vietnam with a total of $5.4 billion in order to alleieviate sanctions and help with their third five-year plan (1981-1985). The Soviet Union also provided 90% of Vietnam's demand for raw materials and 70% of its grain imports.[258] Along with that the Soviet Union vetod many resolutions at the United Nations that were critical of the invasion or attempted to put sanctions on it.[259] Even though the figures suggest the Soviet Union was a reliable ally, privately Soviet leaders were dissatisfied with Hanoi's handling of the stalemate in Kampuchea and resented the burden of their aid program to Vietnam as their own country was undergoing economic reforms. In 1986, the Soviet Government announced that it would reduce aid to friendly nations; for Vietnam, those reductions meant the loss of 20% of its economic aid and one-third of its military aid.[260] After the invasion Vietnam attempoted to build a new government in the country and fight a guerilla war against the Khmer Rouge. To implement the new reforms in the country, Vietnam, with support from the Soviet Union, started transferring several years' worth of military equipment to the KPRAF, which numbered more than 70,000 soldiers. The Vietnamese Ministry of Defense's International Relations Department then advised its Kampuchean counterparts to only use the available equipment to maintain their current level of operations, and not to engage in major operations which could exhaust those supplies.[261] By the end of the war the Soviet Union started to decline, but depite this the regime change ended successfully, though the Khmer Rouge would be active in guerrilla actions for many more years.

1979–1989: Afghanistan

During the 1978 coup d'état in Afghanistan, where the communist party took power, it initiated a series of radical modernization reforms throughout the country that were forced and deeply unpopular, particularly among the more traditional rural population and the established traditional power structures.[37] The regime's nature[38] of vigorously suppressing opposition, including executing thousands of political prisoners, led to the rise of anti-government armed groups and, by April 1979, large parts of the country were in open rebellion.[39] The ruling party itself experienced deep rivalries and, in September 1979, the President, Nur Mohammad Taraki, was murdered under orders of the second-in-command, Hafizullah Amin, which soured relations with the Soviet Union. Eventually the Soviet government, under leader Leonid Brezhnev, decided to deploy the 40th Army on December 24, 1979.[40] Arriving in the capital Kabul, they staged a coup,[41] killing president Amin and installing Soviet loyalist Babrak Karmal from a rival faction.[39] The deployment had been variously called an "invasion" (by Western media and the rebels) or a legitimate supporting intervention (by the Soviet Union and the Afghan government)[42][43] on the basis of the Brezhnev Doctrine.

The location of Afghanistan

In January 1980, foreign ministers from 34 nations of the Islamic Conference adopted a resolution demanding "the immediate, urgent and unconditional withdrawal of Soviet troops" from Afghanistan.[44] The UN General Assembly passed a resolution protesting the Soviet intervention by a vote of 104 (for) to 18 (against), with 18 abstentions and 12 members of the 152-nation Assembly absent or not participating in the vote;[44][45] only Soviet allies Angola, East Germany and Vietnam, along with India, supported the intervention.[46] Afghan insurgents began to receive massive amounts of aid and military training in neighboring Pakistan and China,[15] paid for primarily by the United States and Arab monarchies in the Persian Gulf.[7][8][15][11][47][48][49][50] As documented by the National Security Archive, "the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) played a significant role in asserting U.S. influence in Afghanistan by funding military operations designed to frustrate the Soviet invasion of that country. CIA covert action worked through Pakistani intelligence services to reach Afghan rebel groups."[51] Soviet troops occupied the cities and main arteries of communication, while the mujahideen waged guerrilla war in small groups operating in the almost 80 percent of the country that was outside government and Soviet control, almost exclusively being the rural countryside.[52] The Soviets used their air power to deal harshly with both rebels and civilians, levelling villages to deny safe haven to the mujahideen, destroying vital irrigation ditches, and laying millions of land mines.[53][54][55][56]

Soviet soldiers returning from Afghanistan. 20 October 1986, Kushka, Turkmenia.

The international community imposed numerous sanctions and embargoes against the Soviet Union, and the U.S. led a boycott of the 1980 Summer Olympics held in Moscow. The boycott and sanctions exacerbated Cold War tensions and enraged the Soviet government, which later led a revenge boycott of the 1984 Olympics held in Los Angeles.[57] The Soviets initially planned to secure towns and roads, stabilize the government under new leader Karmal, and withdraw within six months or a year. But they were met with fierce resistance from the guerillas,[58] and were stuck in a bloody war that lasted nine years.[59] By the mid-1980s, the Soviet contingent was increased to 108,800 and fighting increased, but the military and diplomatic cost of the war to the USSR was high.[9] By mid-1987, the Soviet Union, now under reformist leader Mikhail Gorbachev, announced it would start withdrawing its forces after meetings with the Afghan government.[5][6] The final troop withdrawals started on May 15, 1988, and ended on February 15, 1989, leaving the government forces alone in the battle against the insurgents, which continued until 1992 when the former Soviet-backed government collapsed. Due to its length, it has sometimes been referred to as the "Soviet Union's Vietnam War" or the "Bear Trap" by the Western media.[60][61][62] The Soviets' failure in the war[63] is thought to be a contributing factor to the fall of the Soviet Union.[64]

1980s

1982–1990: Nicaragua

The US had been heavily involved in Nicaragua all throughout the 20th century. After the second occupation of Nicaragua the US friendly Somoza family was left in charge. Under their rule inequality and political repression became rampant. In 1961 the FSLN (Sandinista National Liberation Front), commonly known as the Sandinistas, was founded by radical students to oppose their rule. Throughout the 1960s they would build up their political base and organization. In the 1970s they began resistance against the government and the Somoza regime recognized them as a threat. In January 1978 anti-Somoza journalist Pedro Joaquín Chamorro Cardenal was killed, likely by Somoza allies. As a result, riots broke out across the country. The FSLN also called for a general strike which would be extremely successful at shutting down most of the countries businesses. On August 22, 1978 the FSLN did a massive series of kidnapping and attacks against the Somoza government. In early 1979 the OAS (Organization of American States) mediated negotiations between both groups, but the Sandinistas stopped them when they realized the Somoza regime had no intention of initiating free elections. In June 1979 the Saninistas held power over most of the country except the capital, and in July 1979 Anastasio Somoza Debayle resigned and his successor handed the capital to the FSLN.[262][263]

During the initial overthrow the Sandinistas already were receiving support from left wing and left leaning governments. The USSR immediately developed relations with the new government, and the two became good allies. The USSR would begin to send aid and military weapons to the government. During the 1980s, the Soviet Union provided full political, economic, military, and diplomatic support to the left wing government of Nicaragua. They provided free credit, economic subsidies and heavy weapon grants to the Sandinistas. The Nicaraguans got at no cost armaments such as heavily armed MI-24 attack helicopters (Hinds), and Mi-17 transport helicopters. Already former parts of the Somoza regime had begun to regroup and organize along the Nicaraguan border, forming the Contras. In the US the Carter Administration had tried to work with the new FSLN government, but the succeeding Reagan Administration had a much more anti communist foreign policy and began to give assistance to the Contras. The Contras launched an offensive against the FSLN government in 1981. The USSR responded by ramping up their military support in 1982. They would continue to give support against the Contras until the 1990 Nicaraguan General Election and the Contras ceasing of their hostilities.[264][265][266]

1984: United States

When Ronald Reagan was running for re-election as president, the Soviet Union opposed his candidacy and took active measures against his campaigning.[267] Soviet intelligence reportedly attempted to infiltrate both the Republican National Committee and Democratic National Committee.[267]

1991–present: Post-Cold War

1990s

1992-1997: Tajikistan

Throughout the late 1980s and the early 1990s the Soviet Union began to collapse. As this happened the Tajik SSR, like the other SSRs, began to go into unrest, such as the Dushanbe Riots from February 12–14 of 1990. The Tajik SSR ended up declaring independence from the Soviet Union on September 9, 1991, and a few months later on December 25, 1991 the Soviet Union collapsed. Before the collapse of the Soviet Union Tajikistan was one of the poorest parts of the SSR, and also had a very religious population, and many new questions emerged on how to handle the new country. As well during Perestroika many opposition parties emerged in the SSR such as the Islamic Renaissance Party of Tajikistan, Democratic Party of Tajikistan, Rastokez, Lali Badakhshan, among others. As the new Tajikistani government was created in the wake of the 1991 Tajikistani General Election tensions immediately started to rise in the country. The new government was headed by president Rahmon Nabiyev and Supreme Soviet Safarali Kenjav. They began distributing arms to many pro government militias as the opposition parties previously formed started protesting the governments actions. At the same time as political tensions rose ethnic tensions began to rise too among various enthnicities present in the country causing many Russian and Jewish people began to flee the country because of ethnic tension, a trend that would continue during the conflict.

Location of Tajikistan

This all culminated in fighting between the opposition and supported of the government from the old guard in May 1992, beginning the country's civil war. There were two main sides to the war. One was the current government made up of the old Soviet elite, with the support of Popular Front of Tajikistan. The other side was known as the United Tajik Opposition (UTO) made up of the opposition parties believing in various ideologies including liberal democrats and Islamists, including Taliban members, who had the support of Al Qaeda and Saudi Arabia.[268] As well different ethic clans fought one another.

The government itself would have the help of the newly formed Russian Federation, along with several other countries in Central Asia. They would receive the help of Russian border guards.[269] As well aid from Russia sent military aid to the government, which helped the Popular Front to route the opposition in 1992. Despite this the government's coalition collapsed and in 1994 Emomali Rahmon became the new president of the country. At the same time the opposition regrouped and with the help of the Jamiat-i-Islami attacked again.[270] They advanced and in 1996 Russian troops were fighting against the UTO.

As the war continued to become more brutal the United Nations sent the observers, and the two sides began to negotiate in 1997. They agreed to a United Nations supported armistice. They negotiated in Moscow and signed the "General Agreement on the Establishment of Peace and National Accord in Tajikistan" and "Moscow Protocol' on June 27, 1997 in Moscow, ending the war.[271]

2000s

2004: Ukraine

The Russian government publicly attempted to influence the 2004 Ukrainian presidential election.[272] Russian President Vladimir Putin gave public support for candidate Viktor Yanukovych and made public visits to Ukraine on his behalf. According to Kempe and Solonenko, "The overall interest of the Russian elite was to keep Ukraine as a reliable neighbor and partner." This was accomplished by channeling Russian funding and expertise directly into the campaign of Yanukovych or the government of Ukraine, in an effort described as "nakedly partisan".[272]

2010s

2014: Ukraine

The location of Ukraine

In 2014 Ukraine had a revolution and overthrew Viktor Yanukovych. On 6 March 2014, the Crimean Parliament voted to "enter into the Russian Federation with the rights of a subject of the Russian Federation" and later held a referendum asking the people of these regions whether they wanted to join Russia as a federal subject, or if they wanted to restore the 1992 Crimean constitution and Crimea's status as a part of Ukraine.[273] Though passed with an overwhelming majority, the results are contested by some [274][275][276] and approved by others.[277] Crimea and Sevastopol formally declared independence as the Republic of Crimea and requested that they be admitted as constituents of the Russian Federation.[278] On 18 March 2014, Russia and Crimea signed a treaty of accession of the Republic of Crimea and Sevastopol in the Russian Federation, though the United Nations General Assembly voted in favor of a non-binding statement to oppose Russia's annexation of the peninsula.[279]

Pro-Russian hackers launched a series of cyber attacks over several days to disrupt the May 2014 Ukrainian presidential election, releasing hacked emails, attempting to alter vote tallies, and delaying the final result with distributed denial-of-service attacks.[280][281] Malware that would have displayed a graphic declaring far-right candidate Dmytro Yarosh the electoral winner was removed from Ukraine's Central Election Commission less than an hour before polls closed. Despite this, Channel One Russia "reported that Mr. Yarosh had won and broadcast the fake graphic, citing the election commission's website, even though it had never appeared there."[280][282] According to Peter Ordeshook: "These faked results were geared for a specific audience in order to feed the Russian narrative that has claimed from the start that ultra-nationalists and Nazis were behind the revolution in Ukraine."[280]

All these events set up the stage for the Donbass War.

2015-present: Syria

Beginning in December 2010 the Arab Spring occurred, as throughout the Middle East the peoples present in those countries rose up against their authorititarian dictators. The people rose up largely due to the grueling poverty they experienced. Most of these uprisings and protests eventually turned into brutal civil wars. Syria was lead by the dictator Bashar al-Assad. What started as protests eventually turned into the Syrian Civil War. Many different militant groups rose during the civil war to oppose Assad includuing the Free Syrian Army (FSA), Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL), the Al-Nusra Front, the Army of Conquest, and many others.[283][284][285] At the same time in many countries including the United States, Turkey, the United Kingdom, and France were against Assad.

Location of Syria

Syria was an ally of Russia and ever since the civil war began Russia supported Syria diploamticallty and in the United Nations. In 2015 as the Syrian gvoernemnt was being pushed back Assad requested that Russia intervene and in September 2015 Russia began bombing Syrian areas claiming that they were fighting ISIL, which was an internationally disliked, however evidence has shown that they have also attacked the FSA, Al-Nusra, and other rebel groups.[286][287][283][284][285] The Russian government also apporved it and justified it as keeping stability in Syria.[288] As well the Russian military got into frequent skrimishes with Turkey such as the shooting down of a Russian jet or the fighting between the two in Idlib that began in 2020. As well the intervention has provided the Syrian government with many gains including retaking Aleppo and Deir ez-Zor.[289][290][291] In early January 2017, the Chief of the General Staff of the Russian Armed Forces Valery Gerasimov said that, overall, the Russian Air Force had carried out 19,160 combat missions and delivered 71,000 strikes on "the infrastructure of terrorists".[292] At the end of December 2017, the Russian government said its troops would be based in Syria permanently.[293]

2016: Germany

The Fancy Bear group is suspected to be behind a spear phishing attack in August 2016 on members of the Bundestag and multiple political parties such as Linken-faction leader Sahra Wagenknecht, Junge Union and the CDU of Saarland.[294][295][296][297] Authorities feared that sensitive information could be gathered by hackers to later manipulate the public ahead of elections such as Germany's next federal election which was due in September 2017.[294]

2016: Montenegro

On the eve of 16 October 2016, the day of the parliamentary election in Montenegro, a group of 20 Serbian and Montenegrin citizens, including the former head of Serbian Gendarmery Bratislav Dikić, were arrested;[298][299] some of them, along with other persons, including two Russian citizens, were later formally charged by the authorities of Montenegro with an attempted coup d'état. In early November 2016, Montenegro's special prosecutor for organised crime and corruption, Milivoje Katnić, alleged that "a powerful organization" that comprised about 500 people from Russia, Serbia and Montenegro was behind the coup plot.[300] In February 2017, Montenegrin officials accused the Russian 'state structures' of being behind the attempted coup, which allegedly envisaged an attack on the country's parliament and assassination of prime minister Milo Đukanović.[301][302]

The details about the coup plot were first made public at the end of October 2016 by Serbia's prime minister Aleksandar Vučić, whose public statement on the matter stressed the role of Serbia's law enforcers, especially the Serbian Security Intelligence Agency, in thwarting it.[303][304] The statement was immediately followed by an unscheduled visit to Belgrade by Nikolai Patrushev, secretary of Russia's Security Council.[303]

According to the prime minister Duško Marković′s statements made in February 2017, the government received definitive information about the coup being prepared on 12 October 2016, when a person involved in the plot gave away the fallback scenario of his Russian minders; this information was also corroborated by the security services of NATO member countries, who helped the Montenegrin government to investigate the plot.[305] One of the charged, Predrag Bogićević from Kragujevac, a veteran and leader of the Ravna Gora Movement, said that Saša Sinđelić informed him on a possible attack on Serbs who participated in the October 16th protest. Bogićević, in Serbian detention, said through his lawyer that there was no talks whatsoever on a coup and no mentions of Đukanović.[306]

The Moscow–based Russian Institute for Strategic Studies (RISS), which has close ties to Russian Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR), was mentioned by mass media as one of the organisations involved in devising the coup plot; in early November 2017, Russian president Vladimir Putin sacked the RISS director, Leonid P. Reshetnikov, a ranking veteran officer of the SVR.[307][308]

2016: United Kingdom

There is ongoing investigation[309] by the UK Electoral Commission, the UK Parliament's Culture Select Committee, and the US Senate, on alleged Russian interference in the Brexit poll of 23 June 2016.[310]

2016: United States

In October 2016, the U.S. government accused Russia of interfering in the 2016 United States elections using a number of strategies including the hacking of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and leaking its documents to WikiLeaks, which then leaked them to the media.[311][312] Russia has denied any involvement.[313]

In response, on 29 December 2016, President Barack Obama expelled 35 Russian diplomats and broadened sanctions on Russian entities and individuals.[314]

In January 2017, following a British intelligence tip-off,[315][316] the U.S. Intelligence Community expressed "high confidence" that Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered an influence campaign designed to interfere in the 2016 U.S. elections, undermine confidence in the U.S. democratic process, harm Secretary Hillary Clinton's chances, and help Donald Trump win.[317]

2017: France, Germany

Researchers from Trend Micro in 2017 released a report outlining attempts by Fancy Bear to target groups related to the election campaigns of Emmanuel Macron and Angela Merkel. According to the report, they targeted the Macron campaign with phishing and attempting to install malware on their site. French government cybersecurity agency ANSSI confirmed these attacks took place, but could not confirm APT28's responsibility.[318] The APT group did not target Marine Le Pen, further showing Russia's involvement in the French elections, since Putin has expressed his interest and hopes in Marine Le Pen's victory for both political and financial gains.[319]

The report says they then targeted the German Konrad Adenauer Foundation and Friedrich Ebert Foundation, groups that are associated with Angela Merkel's Christian Democratic Union and opposition Social Democratic Party, respectively. Fancy Bear set up fake email servers in late 2016 to send phishing emails with links to malware.[320]

2019–present: Venezuela

During the 2019 Venezuelan presidential crisis, Russia has provided Nicolás Maduro's government with diplomatic, logistical and military support.

Reuters reported that Russian mercenaries associated with the Wagner Group were in Venezuela to defend Maduro's government.[321] Professor Robert Ellis of the United States Army War College described 400 Wagner Group mercenaries provided by Russia as the "palace guard of Nicolás Maduro".[322] Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov denied the deployment of Russian mercenaries, calling it "fake news".[323][324] Two nuclear weapon-capable Russian planes landed in Venezuela in December 2018 in what Reuters called a "show of support for Maduro's socialist government".[325]

On 23 March 2019, two Russian planes landed in Venezuela, carrying 99 troops[326] and 35 tonnes of materiel.[325] Alexey Seredin from the Russian embassy in Caracas said the two planes were "part of an effort to maintain Maduro's defense apparatus, which includes Sukhoi fighter jets and anti-aircraft systems purchased from Russia".[326] On 29 March, a flight simulation center for Russian helicopters was launched in Venezuela,[327] and another flight simulator center is planned, as well as a plant to produce Russian arms.[326] Russia supplies arms, special forces, and military advisors to Venezuela, and a base for cyber warfare is under construction on a Venezuelan island.[328] Diosdado Cabello said the arrival of the planes was approved and authorized by Maduro.[329] Russian Foreign Affairs spokeswoman Maria Zakharova also confirmed the presence of military personnel in Venezuela, arguing that the countries had a bilateral agreement on military cooperation signed by Presidents Putin and Chávez in May 2001.[330][331]

National Assembly president Juan Guaidó declared that foreign soldiers have been "imported" because Maduro's government does not trust the Venezuelan Armed Forces.[332] National Assembly deputy Williams Dávila said the National Assembly would investigate the "penetration of foreign forces in Venezuela", since Venezuela's Constitution requires that the legislature authorize foreign military missions and the arrival of Russian military was a "violation of Venezuelan sovereignty".[333] The Organization of American States described Russia's deployment of troops as "a harmful act to Venezuelan sovereignty".[334]

In April 2019, Malta refused to allow Russian planes to use its airspace to supply Maduro's government.[335] Russia described Malta's actions as "unfriendly" and warned that it would take this into account in bilateral relations between the two countries.[336]

An article from The Wall Street Journal reported that Russia state defense contractor reduced Rostec staff in Venezuela in June due to "the acceptance that Mr. Maduro’s regime no longer has the cash to continue to pay for other Rostec services associated with past contracts".[337] According to undisclosed sources, the number of Russian operatives would have been reduced to "just a few dozen from about 1,000 at the height of cooperation between Moscow and Caracas several years ago".[337] Donald Trump announced on Twitter: "Russia has informed us that they have removed most of their people from Venezuela".[338] Rostec reported that the numbers published by the newspaper were exaggerated[339][340] and Russian spokesman Dmitry Peskov, expressed to the press that he had not been in touch with Trump: "it’s a circumstantial reference to newspaper sources of information, because there was no official message about this from the Russian side".[340] According to news agency RIA, Russia foreign ministry expressed some days later that their country was ready to send more military specialist if needed, another Russian press, TASS, quoted the ministry saying that Russia did not rule out increasing the number of military in Venezuela.[341]

On 26 June, Russia announced the withdrawal of its military technicians that were in Venezuela since March. According to the Russian embassy in Caracas, "Russia delivered to Venezuela high-level equipment that requires regular maintenance. Furthermore, Russian specialists provided technical training to Venezuelan staff. Unlike reported, it was not a Russian military presence but the fulfillment of maintenance contracts".[342]

In September, two Russian planes said to be carrying technical specialists arrived in Venezuela.[343]

On 10 December, a group of around forty Russian soldiers arrived to Canaima, Bolívar, on a Shaanxi Y-8 plane landing on the runway that serves as the entry to the National Park. Locals assured that the soldiers wore uniforms of the Venezuelan Armed Forces and that they carried crates with microwave equipment, satellite antennas, signal inhibitors, and other devices.[344]

Russia welcomed Luis Parra's appointment as President of the National Assembly during the 2020 Venezuelan National Assembly Delegated Committee election. The Russian Foreign Ministry said that the appointment contributes to the return of the intra-Venezuelan political struggle to the constitutional field that will find a peaceful exit to the ongoing crisis.[345] Opposition deputies denounced that Russia looked after supporting Parra to improve its businesses in Venezuela, including to increase the Russian shareholder participation in oil contracts and other mining concessions that need the approval of the National Assembly and that it would not have with Guaidó.[346]

Venezuelan media reported on 7 May, after the Macuto Bay raid, that Russian Special Operations Forces were assisting Maduro with surveillance from unmanned aerial vehicles.[347]

2020s

2020: United States

On February 13, 2020, American intelligence officials advised members of the House Intelligence Committee that Russia was interfering in the 2020 election in an effort to get Trump re-elected.[348] The briefing was delivered by Shelby Pierson, the intelligence community's top election security official and an aide to acting Director of National Intelligence Joseph Maguire. Trump allies on the committee challenged the findings, and Trump was angered to learn of the briefing as he believed Democrats might "weaponize" the information against him. He chastised Maguire for allowing the briefing to occur, and days later he appointed Richard Grenell to replace Maguire.[349][350][351]

Bloomberg News reported in January 2020 that American intelligence and law enforcement were examining whether Russia was involved in promoting disinformation to undermine Joe Biden as part of a campaign to disrupt the 2020 election.[352] The following month, the Estonian Foreign Intelligence Service warned that Russia would attempt to interfere in the Georgian parliamentary elections in October 2020 as well as the US election in November.[353]

On February 21, 2020, The Washington Post reported that, according to unnamed US officials, Russia was interfering in the Democratic primary in an effort to support the nomination of Senator Bernie Sanders.[354]

See also

Notes

  1. The exact number of people deported between 1939 and 1941 remains unknown. Estimates vary between 350,000 and more than 1.5 million; Rummel estimates the number at 1.2 million, and Kushner and Knox 1.5 million.[144][145]

References

  1. Levin, Dov H. (June 2016). "When the Great Power Gets a Vote: The Effects of Great Power Electoral Interventions on Election Results". International Studies Quarterly. 60 (2): 189–202. doi:10.1093/isq/sqv016. For example, the U.S. and the USSR/Russia have intervened in one of every nine competitive national level executive elections between 1946 and 2000.
  2. Levin, Dov H. (June 2016). "When the Great Power Gets a Vote: The Effects of Great Power Electoral Interventions on Election Results". International Studies Quarterly. 60 (2): 189–202. doi:10.1093/isq/sqv016.
  3. Levin, Dov H. (7 September 2016). "Sure, the U.S. and Russia often meddle in foreign elections. Does it matter?". The Washington Post. Retrieved 21 May 2019.
  4. Mansell, Wade and Openshaw, Karen, "International Law: A Critical Introduction," Chapter 5, Hart Publishing, 2014, https://books.google.com/booksid=XYrqAwAAQBAJ&pg=PT140
  5. "All Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state." United Nations, "Charter of the United Nations," Article 2(4), http://www.un.org/en/sections/un-charter/chapter-i/index.html Archived October 28, 2017, at the Wayback Machine
  6. Fox, Gregory, "Regime Change," 2013, Oxford Public International Law, Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Sections C(12) and G(53)–(55), Archived November 4, 2016, at the Wayback Machine
  7. Upton 1980, pp. 163–194, Alapuro 1988, pp. 158–162, 195–196, Keränen et al. 1992, pp. 35, 37, 39, 40, 50, 52, Haapala 1995, pp. 229–245, Klinge 1997, pp. 487–524, Kalela 2008b, pp. 31–44, Kalela 2008c, pp. 95–109, Haapala 2014, pp. 21–50, Siltala 2014, pp. 51–89
  8. Keränen et al. 1992, p. 50, Haapala 1995, pp. 229–245, Klinge 1997, pp. 502–524, Kalela 2008b, pp. 31–44, Kalela 2008c, pp. 95–109, Haapala 2014, pp. 21–50, Jyränki 2014, pp. 18–38
  9. Upton 1980, pp. 163–194, Kettunen 1986, pp. 9–89, Alapuro 1988, pp. 158–162, 195–196, Alapuro 1992, pp. 251–267, Keränen et al. 1992, pp. 35, 37, 39, 40, 50, 52, Haapala 1995, pp. 229–245, Klinge 1997, pp. 502–524, Haapala 2008, pp. 255–261, Kalela 2008b, pp. 31–44, Kalela 2008c, pp. 95–109, Siltala 2014, pp. 51–89
  10. The Bolsheviks received 15 million marks from Berlin after the October Revolution, but Lenin's authority was weak and Russia became embroiled in a civil war which turned the focus of all the major Russian military, political and economic activities inwards. Keränen et al. 1992, p. 36, Pipes 1996, pp. 113–149, Lackman 2000, pp. 86–95, Lackman 2009, pp. 48–57, McMeekin 2017, pp. 125–136
  11. Svinhufvud's initial vision was that the Senate would lead Finland and the independence process with a call for a Regent; there would be no talks with the Bolsheviks, who it was believed would not set a non-socialist Finland free. The vision of the socialists was that Parliament should lead Finland and that independence would be achieved more easily through negotiations with a weak Bolshevik government than with other parties of the Russian Constituent Assembly, Upton 1980, pp. 343–382, Keränen et al. 1992, pp. 73, 78, Manninen 1993c, Jutikkala 1995, pp. 11–20, Haapala 2014, pp. 21–50, Jyränki 2014, pp. 18–38
  12. The Bolshevist Council of People's Commissars ratified the recognition on 4 January 1918. Upton 1980, pp. 343–382, Keränen et al. 1992, pp. 79, 81, Keskisarja 2017, pp. 13–74
  13. Upton 1980, pp. 390–515, Lappalainen 1981a, pp. 15–65, 177–182, Manninen* 1993c, pp. 398–432, Hoppu 2009a, pp. 92–111, Siltala 2014, pp. 51–89, Tikka 2014, pp. 90–118
  14. Upton 1980, pp. 390–515, Keränen et al. 1992, pp. 80–89, Manninen 1993b, pp. 96–177, Manninen* 1993c, pp. 398–432, Westerlund 2004b, pp. 175–188, Tikka 2014, pp. 90–118
  15. The Reds won the battle and gained 20,000 rifles, 30 machine guns, 10 cannons and 2 armoured vehicles. In total, the Russians delivered 20,000 rifles from the Helsinki and Tampere depots to the Reds. The Whites captured 14,500 rifles, 90 machine guns, 40 cannons and 4 mortars from the Russian garrisons. Some Russian army officers sold their unit's weapons both to the Reds and the Whites. Upton 1980, pp. 390–515, Lappalainen 1981a, pp. 15–65, 177–182, Klemettilä 1989, pp. 163–203, Keränen et al. 1992, pp. 80–89, Manninen 1993b, pp. 96–177, Manninen* 1993c, pp. 398–432, Tikka 2014, pp. 90–118
  16. Attempts at sustaining peace and neutrality between socialist and non-socialists were made in January 1918 by agreements at a local level, e.g. in Muurame, Savonlinna and Teuva, Kallioinen 2009, pp. 1–146
  17. The fall of the Russian Empire, the October revolt and Finnish Germanism had placed Gustaf Mannerheim in a controversial position. He opposed the Finnish and Russian Reds, as well as Germany, through alliance with Russian White officers who, in turn, did not support independence of Finland. Keränen et al. 1992, pp. 102, 142, Manninen 1995, pp. 21–32, Klinge 1997, pp. 516–524, Lackman 2000, Westerlund 2004b, pp. 175–188, Meinander 2012, pp. 7–47, Roselius 2014, pp. 119–155
  18. After the Russian Civil War, a gradually resurgent Russia recaptured many of the nations that had become independent in 1918. Upton 1981, pp. 255–278, Klemettilä 1989, pp. 163–203, Keränen et al. 1992, pp. 94, 106, Pietiäinen 1992, pp. 252–403, Manninen 1993c, Manninen 1995, pp. 21–32, Jussila 2007, pp. 276–282
  19. Upton 1981, pp. 262–265, Pietiäinen 1992, pp. 252–403, Manninen 1995, pp. 21–32
  20. (in Russian) Kuzmin, S. L., Oyuunchimeg, J. and Bayar, B. The battle at Ulaankhad, one of the main events in the fight for independence of Mongolia Archived 21 February 2018 at the Wayback Machine, Studia Historica Instituti Historiae Academiae Scientiarum Mongoli, 2011–12, vol. 41–42, no 14, pp. 182–217
  21. (in Russian) Kuzmin, S.L., Oyuunchimeg, J. and Bayar, B. The Ulaan Khad: reconstruction of a forgotten battle for independence of Mongolia Archived 21 February 2018 at the Wayback Machine, Rossiya i Mongoliya: Novyi Vzglyad na Istoriyu (Diplomatiya, Ekonomika, Kultura), 2015, vol. 4. Irkutsk, pp. 103–14.
  22. Докумэнты внэшнэй политики СССР [Foreign political events involving the Soviet Union], (Moscow, 1957), v. 3, no. 192, pp. 55-56.
  23. Ioan Scurtu, Istoria Basarabiei de la inceputuri 2003, p. 296-297
  24. Charles Upson Clark. Bessarabia, Russia and Roumania on the Black Sea Chapter 18
  25. Ludmila Rotari, Miscarea Subversiva in Basarabia 1918-1924, Editura Enciclopedica, 2004, p. 240
  26. Mircea Musat. România dupa Marea Unire Editura Stiintifica si Enciclopedica, 1986. p. 781-782
  27. Scurtu, p. 297, Rotari, p. 241, Tătărescu
  28. Enciclopedia Sovietica Moldoveneasca, vol. 6, Chisinau, 1976, p. 352
  29. Charles Upson Clark: Bessarabia, Russia and Roumania on the Black Sea, chapter 18
  30. Cahoon, Ben. "Tannu Tuva". worldstatesmen.org.
  31. Jonathan D. Smele: Historical Dictionary of the Russian Civil Wars, 1916–1926, 2015, Lanham (Maryland) 2015, p. 1197.
  32. Frank Stocker: Als Vampire die Mark eroberten: Eine faszinierende Reise durch die rätselhafte Welt der Banknoten in 80 kurzen Geschichten, (online) 2015, p. 69.
  33. Indjin Bayart: An Russland, das kein Russland ist, Hamburg 2014, p. 114.
  34. Forsyth, James (1994). A History of the Peoples of Siberia: Russia's North Asian Colony 1581-1990. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 281. ISBN 052-147-771-9.
  35. Li, Narangoa; Cribb, Robert (2014-09-02). Historical Atlas of Northeast Asia, 1590-2010: Korea, Manchuria, Mongolia, Eastern Siberia. 2014. p. 175. ISBN 978-023-153-716-2.
  36. Sinor, Denis, ed. (1990). Aspects of Altaic Civilization III. London: Psychology Press. p. 8. ISBN 070-070-380-2.
  37. Lando, Steve (2010). Europas tungomål II (in Swedish). Sweden. p. 710. ISBN 978-917-465-076-1.
  38. Sidebotham, Herbert (16 August 1919). "The Third Afghan War". New Statesman.
  39. H. L (1932). "Soviet Treaties of Neutrality and Non-Aggression, 1931-32". Bulletin of International News. 8 (20): 3–6. JSTOR 25639033.
  40. Ritter, William S (1990). "Revolt in the Mountains: Fuzail Maksum and the Occupation of Garm, Spring 1929". Journal of Contemporary History 25: 547. doi:10.1177/002200949002500408.
  41. Ritter, William (1990). "Revolt in the Mountains: Fuzail Maksum and the Occupation of Garm, Spring 1929". Journal of Contemporary History. 25 (4): 547–580. doi:10.1177/002200949002500408. ISSN 0022-0094. JSTOR 260761.
  42. "Lessons for Leaders: What Afghanistan Taught Russian and Soviet Strategists | Russia Matters". www.russiamatters.org. Retrieved 2019-12-24. In 1929 Stalin sent 1,000 Red Army soldiers into Afghanistan disguised as Afghan soldiers to operate jointly with some of Khan’s loyalists, according to Lyakhovsky’s book and a 1999 article in Rodina by Pavel Aptekar. The joint Soviet-Afghan unit took Mazar-i-Sharif in April 1929, but Stalin then had to recall his troops after learning that Khan had fled to India.
  43. Muhammad, Fayz; Hazārah, Fayz̤ Muḥammad Kātib (1999). Kabul Under Siege: Fayz Muhammad's Account of the 1929 Uprising. Markus Wiener Publishers. p. 274. ISBN 9781558761551.
  44. Preston (2006). pp. 8283.
  45. Preston (2006). p. 102.
  46. Howson (1998). pp. 1–2.
  47. Beevor (2006). pp. 30–33.
  48. Howson (1998). p. 125.
  49. Howson (1998). pp. 126–129.
  50. Howson (1998). p. 134.
  51. Payne (2004). pp. 156–157.
  52. Beevor (2006). pp. 152–153.
  53. Beevor (2006). p. 163.
  54. Graham (2005). p. 92.
  55. Thomas (2003). p. 944.
  56. Thomas (1961). p. 637.
  57. Beevor (2006). pp. 153–154.
  58. Richardson (2015). pp. 31–40
  59. Beevor (2006). pp. 273, 246.
  60. Beevor (2006). pp. 396–397.
  61. Derby (2009). p. 28.
  62. Taagepera, Rein (1993). Estonia: return to independence. Westview Press. p. 58. ISBN 978-0-8133-1199-9.
  63. Ziemele, Ineta (2003). "State Continuity, Succession and Responsibility: Reparations to the Baltic States and their Peoples?". Baltic Yearbook of International Law. Martinus Nijhoff. 3: 165–190. doi:10.1163/221158903x00072.
  64. Kaplan, Robert B.; Jr, Richard B. Baldauf (2008-01-01). Language Planning and Policy in Europe: The Baltic States, Ireland and Italy. Multilingual Matters. p. 79. ISBN 9781847690289. Most Western countries had not recognised the incorporation of the Baltic States into the Soviet Union, a stance that irritated the Soviets without ever becoming a major point of conflict.
  65. Kavass, Igor I. (1972). Baltic States. W. S. Hein. The forcible military occupation and subsequent annexation of the Baltic States by the Soviet Union remains to this day (written in 1972) one of the serious unsolved issues of international law
  66. Davies, Norman (2001). Dear, Ian (ed.). The Oxford companion to World War II. Michael Richard Daniell Foot. Oxford University Press. p. 85. ISBN 978-0-19-860446-4.
  67. Mälksoo (2003), p. 193.
  68. The Occupation of Latvia Archived 2007-11-23 at the Wayback Machine at Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Latvia
  69. "22 September 1944 from one occupation to another". Estonian Embassy in Washington. 2008-09-22. Retrieved 2009-05-01. For Estonia, World War II did not end, de facto, until 31 August 1994, with the final withdrawal of former Soviet troops from Estonian soil.
  70. Feldbrugge, Ferdinand; Gerard Pieter van den Berg; William B. Simons (1985). Encyclopedia of Soviet law. BRILL. p. 461. ISBN 90-247-3075-9. On March 26, 1949, the US Department of State issued a circular letter stating that the Baltic countries were still independent nations with their own diplomatic representatives and consuls.
  71. Fried, Daniel (June 14, 2007). "U.S.-Baltic Relations: Celebrating 85 Years of Friendship" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on August 19, 2012. Retrieved 2009-04-29. From Sumner Wells' declaration of July 23, 1940, that we would not recognize the occupation. We housed the exiled Baltic diplomatic delegations. We accredited their diplomats. We flew their flags in the State Department's Hall of Flags. We never recognized in deed or word or symbol the illegal occupation of their lands.
  72. Lauterpacht, E.; C. J. Greenwood (1967). International Law Reports. Cambridge University Press. pp. 62–63. ISBN 0-521-46380-7. The Court said: (256 N.Y.S.2d 196) "The Government of the United States has never recognized the forceful occupation of Estonia and Latvia by the Soviet Union of Socialist Republics nor does it recognize the absorption and incorporation of Latvia and Estonia into the Union of Soviet Socialist republics. The legality of the acts, laws and decrees of the puppet regimes set up in those countries by the USSR is not recognized by the United States, diplomatic or consular officers are not maintained in either Estonia or Latvia and full recognition is given to the Legations of Estonia and Latvia established and maintained here by the Governments in exile of those countries
  73. Motion for a resolution on the Situation in Estonia by the European Parliament, B6-0215/2007, 21.5.2007; passed 24.5.2007. Retrieved 1 January 2010.
  74. Dehousse, Renaud (1993). "The International Practice of the European Communities: Current Survey". European Journal of International Law. 4 (1): 141. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.ejil.a035821. Archived from the original on 2007-09-27. Retrieved 2006-12-09.
  75. European Parliament (January 13, 1983). "Resolution on the situation in Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania". Official Journal of the European Communities. C. 42/78.
  76. European Court of Human Rights cases on Occupation of Baltic States
  77. "Seventh session Agenda item 9" (PDF). United Nations, Human Rights Council, Mission to Estonia. 17 March 2008. Retrieved 2009-05-01. The Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact in 1939 assigned Estonia to the Soviet sphere of influence, prompting the beginning of the first Soviet occupation in 1940. After the German defeat in 1944, the second Soviet occupation started and Estonia became a Soviet republic.
  78. Mälksoo, Lauri (2003). Illegal Annexation and State Continuity: The Case of the Incorporation of the Baltic States by the USSR. Leiden – Boston: Brill. ISBN 90-411-2177-3.
  79. "The Soviet Red Army retook Estonia in 1944, occupying the country for nearly another half century." Frucht, Richard, Eastern Europe: An Introduction to the People, Lands, and Culture, ABC-CLIO, 2005 ISBN 978-1-57607-800-6, p. 132
  80. "Russia and Estonia agree borders". BBC. 18 May 2005. Retrieved April 29, 2009. Five decades of almost unbroken Soviet occupation of the Baltic states of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania ended in 1991
  81. Country Profiles: Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania at UK Foreign Office
  82. The World Book Encyclopedia ISBN 0-7166-0103-6
  83. The History of the Baltic States by Kevin O'Connor ISBN 0-313-32355-0
  84. Saburova, Irina (1955). "The Soviet Occupation of the Baltic States". Russian Review. Blackwell Publishing. 14 (1): 36–49. doi:10.2307/126075. JSTOR 126075.
  85. See, for instance, position expressed by the European Parliament, which condemned "the fact that the occupation of these formerly independent and neutral States by the Soviet Union occurred in 1940 following the Molotov/Ribbentrop pact, and continues." European Parliament (January 13, 1983). "Resolution on the situation in Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania". Official Journal of the European Communities. C. 42/78.
  86. "After the German occupation in 1941–44, Estonia remained occupied by the Soviet Union until the restoration of its independence in 1991." Kolk and Kislyiy v. Estonia (European Court of Human Rights 17 January 2006). Text
  87. David James Smith, Estonia: independence and European integration, Routledge, 2001, ISBN 0-415-26728-5, pXIX
  88. Parrott, Bruce (1995). "Reversing Soviet Military Occupation". State building and military power in Russia and the new states of Eurasia. M.E. Sharpe. pp. 112–115. ISBN 1-56324-360-1.
  89. Van Elsuwege, Peter (April 2004). Russian-speaking minorities in Estonian and Latvia: Problems of integration at the threshold of the European Union (PDF). Flensburg Germany: European Centre for Minority Issues. p. 2. The forcible incorporation of the Baltic states into the Soviet Union in 1940, on the basis of secret protocols to the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact, is considered to be null and void. Even though the Soviet Union occupied these countries for a period of fifty years, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania continued to exist as subjects of international law.
  90. The Forty-Third Session of the UN Sub-Commission Archived 2015-10-19 at the Wayback Machine at Google Scholar
  91. Marek (1968). p. 396. "Insofar as the Soviet Union claims that they are not directly annexed territories but autonomous bodies with a legal will of their own, they (The Baltic SSRs) must be considered puppet creations, exactly in the same way in which the Protectorate or Italian-dominated Albania have been classified as such. These puppet creations have been established on the territory of the independent Baltic states; they cover the same territory and include the same population."
  92. Zalimas, Dainius "Commentary to the Law of the Republic of Lithuania on Compensation of Damage Resulting from the Occupation of the USSR" - Baltic Yearbook of International Law. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, ISBN 978-90-04-13746-2
  93. cf. e.g. Boris Sokolov's article offering an overview Эстония и Прибалтика в составе СССР (1940-1991) в российской историографии (Estonia and the Baltic countries in the USSR (1940-1991) in Russian historiography). Accessed 30 January 2011.
  94. Cole, Elizabeth A. (2007). Teaching the violent past: history education and reconciliation. Rowman & Littlefield. pp. 233–234. ISBN 978-0-7425-5143-5.
  95. Combs, Dick (2008). Inside The Soviet Alternate Universe. Penn State Press. pp. 258, 259. ISBN 978-0-271-03355-6. The Putin administration has stubbornly refused to admit the fact of Soviet occupation of Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia following World War II, although Putin has acknowledged that in 1989, during Gorbachev's reign, the Soviet parliament officially denounced the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact of 1939, which led to the forcible incorporation of the three Baltic states into the Soviet Union.
  96. Bugajski, Janusz (2004). Cold peace. Greenwood Publishing Group. p. 109. ISBN 0-275-98362-5. Russian officials persistently claim that the Baltic states entered the USSR voluntarily and legally at the close of World War II and failed to acknowledge that Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania were under Soviet occupation for fifty years.
  97. МИД РФ: Запад признавал Прибалтику частью СССР, grani.ru, May 2005
  98. Комментарий Департамента информации и печати МИД России в отношении "непризнания" вступления прибалтийских республик в состав СССР, Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Russia), 7 May 2005
  99. Khudoley (2008), Soviet foreign policy during the Cold War, The Baltic factor, p. 90.
  100. Zalimas, Dainius (2004-01-01). "Commentary to the Law of the Republic of Lithuania on Compensation of Damage Resulting from the Occupation of the USSR". Baltic Yearbook of International Law. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. 3: 97–164. doi:10.1163/221158903x00063. ISBN 978-90-04-13746-2.
  101. Parliamentary Assembly (1996). "OPINION No. 193 (1996) on Russia's request for membership of the Council of Europe". Council of Europe. Archived from the original on 7 May 2011. Retrieved 22 May 2011.
  102. as described in Resolution 1455 (2005), Honouring of obligations and commitments by the Russian Federation Archived 2009-04-01 at the Wayback Machine, at the CoE Parliamentary site, retrieved December 6, 2009
  103. Zalimas, Dainius (2004-01-01). "Commentary to the Law of the Republic of Lithuania on Compensation of Damage Resulting from the Occupation of the USSR". Baltic Yearbook of International Law. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. 3: 97–164. doi:10.1163/221158903x00063. ISBN 978-90-04-13746-2.
  104. Treaty between the Russian Soviet Federated Socialist Republic and the Republic of Lithuania on the Basis for Relations between States Archived 2011-07-22 at the Wayback Machine
  105. Quiley, John (2001). "Baltic Russians: Entitled Inhabitants or Unlawful Settlers?". In Ginsburgs, George (ed.). International and national law in Russia and Eastern Europe [Volume 49 of Law in Eastern Europe]. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. p. 327.
  106. "Baltic article". The World & I. Washington Times Corp. 2 (3): 692. 1987.
  107. Shtromas, Alexander; Faulkner, Robert K.; Mahoney, Daniel J. (2003). "Soviet Conquest of the Baltic states". Totalitarianism and the prospects for world order: closing the door on the twentieth century. Applications of political theory. Lexington Books. p. 263. ISBN 9780739105337.
  108. Baltic Military District globalsecurity.org
  109. The Weekly Crier (1999/10) Archived 2013-06-01 at the Wayback Machine Baltics Worldwide. Accessed 11 June 2013.
  110. Russia Pulls Last Troops Out of Baltics The Moscow Times. 22 October 1999.
  111. Peter Oxley (2001). Russia, 1855-1991: From Tsars to Commissars. Oxford UP. pp. 4–5. ISBN 9780199134182.
  112. Munting, Roger (1 January 1984). "Lend-Lease and the Soviet War Effort". Journal of Contemporary History. 19 (3): 495–510. doi:10.1177/002200948401900305. JSTOR 260606.
  113. William Hardy McNeill, America, Britain, and Russia: Their Co-Operation and Conflict, 1941–1946 (1953)
  114. Richard J. Overy, The Dictators: Hitler's Germany and Stalin's Russia (2004)
  115. "Soviet Declaration of War on Japan", 8 August 1945. (Avalon Project at Yale University)
  116. Farrokh, Kaveh (2011-12-20). Iran at War: 1500–1988. ISBN 978-1-78096-221-4.
  117. Hitchins 1991, pp. 211–212.
  118. Georgescu 1991, p. 219.
  119. Hitchins 1991, p. 215.
  120. Hitchins 1991, pp. 215, 221.
  121. Georgescu 1991, pp. 223–224.
  122. Pop 1999, p. 138.
  123. Giurescu, "«Alegeri» după model sovietic", p.17 (citing Berry), 18 (citing Berry and note); Macuc, p.40; Tismăneanu, p.113
  124. "Romania: Country studies – Chapter 1.7.1 "Petru Groza's Premiership"". Federal research Division, Library of Congress. Archived from the original on 14 September 2008. Retrieved 31 August 2008.
  125. "Romania". CIA – The World Factbook. Archived from the original on 10 September 2008. Retrieved 31 August 2008.
  126. "Romania – Country Background and Profile". ed-u.com. Archived from the original on 10 December 2008. Retrieved 31 August 2008.
  127. Bulgaria in World War II: The Passive Alliance.
  128. Wartime Crisis.
  129. Pavlowitch, Stevan K. (2008). Hitler's New Disorder: The Second World War in Yugoslavia. Columbia University Press. pp. 238–240. ISBN 978-0199326631. When Bulgaria switched sides in September
  130. Valentino, Benjamin A. (2005). Final Solutions: Mass Killing and Genocide in the Twentieth Century. Cornell University Press. pp. 91–151. ISBN 978-0-8014-3965-0.
  131. Stankova, Marietta (2015). Bulgaria in British Foreign Policy, 1943–1949. Anthem Press. p. 99. ISBN 978-1-78308-430-2.
  132. Neuburger, Mary C. (2013). Balkan Smoke: Tobacco and the Making of Modern Bulgaria. Cornell University Press. p. 162. ISBN 978-0-8014-5084-6.
  133. Crampton 2005, p. 271.
  134. The Soviet Occupation.
  135. http://legacy.fordham.edu/halsall/mod/1939pact.html
  136. Contributing writers (2010). "Stosunki polsko-białoruskie pod okupacją sowiecką" [Polish-Byelorussian relations under the Soviet occupation]. Internet Archive. Bialorus.pl. Archived from the original on 29 May 2010. Retrieved 26 December 2014.
  137. Bernd Wegner (1997). From Peace to War: Germany, Soviet Russia, and the World, 1939–1941. Berghahn Books. p. 74. ISBN 1-57181-882-0. Retrieved 26 December 2014.
  138. Tadeusz Piotrowski (1998). Poland's Holocaust. McFarland. p. 12. ISBN 0-7864-0371-3. In September, even before the start of the Nazi atrocities that would horrify the world, the Soviets began their own program of systematic individual and mass executions. On the outskirts of Lwów, several hundred policemen were executed at one time. Near Łuniniec, officers and noncommissioned officers of the Frontier Defence Cops together with some policemen, were ordered into barns, taken out and shot ... after December 1939, three hundred Polish priests were killed. And there were many other such incidents.
  139. Rummel p. 132
  140. Kushner p.219
  141. Sylwester Fertacz, "Krojenie mapy Polski: Bolesna granica" (Carving of Poland's map). Alfa. Retrieved from the Internet Archive on 28 October 2015.
  142. J. Lee Ready (1995), World War Two. Nation by Nation, London, Cassell, page 130. ISBN 1-85409-290-1
  143. "Granville/ frm" (PDF). Retrieved 20 September 2009.
  144. "Hungary's 'forgotten' war victims". BBC News. 7 November 2009. Retrieved 4 February 2010.
  145. Hungary: a country study. Library of Congress Federal Research Division, December 1989.
  146. Crampton 1997, p. 263
  147. Hastings, Max (2005). Armageddon: The Battle for Germany, 1944–45. Vintage Books. ISBN 978-0-375-71422-1.
  148. Ziemke, Berlin, see References page 71
  149. LTC David M. Glantz, "August Storm: The Soviet 1945 Strategic Offensive in Manchuria". Leavenworth Papers No. 7, Combat Studies Institute, February 1983, Fort Leavenworth Kansas.
  150. "Battlefield Manchuria – The Forgotten Victory", Battlefield (documentary series), 2001, 98 minutes.
  151. Hayashi, S. (1955). Vol. XIII – Study of Strategic and Tactical peculiarities of Far Eastern Russia and Soviet Far East Forces. Japanese Special Studies on Manchuria. Tokyo, Military History Section, Headquarters, Army Forces Far East, US Army.
  152. Drea, E. J. (1984). "Missing Intentions: Japanese Intelligence and the Soviet Invasion of Manchuria, 1945". Military Affairs. 48 (2): 66–73. doi:10.2307/1987650. JSTOR 1987650.
  153. Robert Butow, Japan's Decision to Surrender, Stanford University Press, 1954 ISBN 978-0-8047-0460-1.
  154. Richard B. Frank, Downfall: The End of the Imperial Japanese Empire, Penguin, 2001 ISBN 978-0-14-100146-3.
  155. Robert James Maddox, Hiroshima in History: The Myths of Revisionism, University of Missouri Press, 2007 ISBN 978-0-8262-1732-5.
  156. Tsuyoshi Hasegawa, Racing the Enemy: Stalin, Truman, and the Surrender of Japan, Belknap Press, 2006 ISBN 0-674-01693-9.
  157. Schoppa, R. Keith. (2000). The Columbia Guide to Modern Chinese History. Columbia University Press. ISBN 0-231-11276-9.
  158. Chen, Jian. [2001] (2001). Mao's China and the Cold War. The University of North Carolina Press. ISBN 0-807-84932-4.
  159. Nguyễn Anh Thái (chief author); Nguyễn Quốc Hùng; Vũ Ngọc Oanh; Trần Thị Vinh; Đặng Thanh Toán; Đỗ Thanh Bình (2002). Lịch sử thế giới hiện đại (in Vietnamese). Ho Chi Minh City: Giáo Dục Publisher. pp. 320–322. 8934980082317.
  160. Yang Kuisong (2011-11-24). 杨奎松《读史求实》:苏联给了林彪东北野战军多少现代武器. Sina Books. Archived from the original on September 26, 2013. Retrieved May 17, 2013.
  161. Hu, Jubin. (2003). Projecting a Nation: Chinese National Cinema Before 1949. Hong Kong University Press. ISBN 962-209-610-7.
  162. Kraus, Charles (11 May 2018). "How Stalin Elevated the Chinese Communist Party to Power in Xinjiang in 1949". Wilson Center.
  163. Cook, Chris Cook. Stevenson, John. [2005] (2005). The Routledge Companion to World History Since 1914. Routledge. ISBN 0-415-34584-7. p. 376.
  164. "Details/Information for Canadian Forces (CF) Operation United Nations Commission on Korea". National Defense and the Canadian Forces. 2004-11-09. Retrieved 13 January 2017.
  165. Cumings, Bruce (2005). Korea's Place in the Sun: A Modern History. New York: W. W. Norton & Company. pp. 211–212. ISBN 978-0-393-32702-1.
  166. Gordenker, Leon (2012). The United Nations and the Peaceful Unification of Korea: The Politics of Field Operations, 1947–1950. Springer. p. 49. ISBN 9789401510578. Retrieved 13 January 2017.
  167. Grogin, p. 133.
  168. Grogin, p. 134.
  169. Grenville, pp. 370–71.
  170. Skoug, p.85.
  171. Europa Publications Limited, p. 304.
  172. https://schoolworkhelper.net/tito-stalin-dispute-1948-timeline-analysis-significance/
  173. Jeronim Perovic, "The Tito–Stalin Split: A Reassessment in Light of New Evidence." Journal of Cold War Studies (Spring 2007) 9#2 pp: 32-63
  174. "No Words Left?". Time Magazine. 22 August 1949. Retrieved 27 April 2010.
  175. West, Richard (2012-11-15). "12 The Quarrel with Stalin". Tito and the Rise and Fall of Yugoslavia. Faber. ISBN 9780571281107.
  176. Laar, M. (2009). The Power of Freedom. Central and Eastern Europe after 1945 (PDF). Centre for European Studies. p. 44. Archived from the original (PDF) on November 11, 2013.
  177. Medvedev, Zhores A; Medvedev, Roy A.; Jelicic, Matej; Skunca, Ivan (2003). The Unknown Stalin. I.B. Tauris. pp. 61–62. ISBN 978-1-58567-502-9.
  178. John R. Lampe; Russell O. Prickett; Ljubisa S. Adamovic (1990). Yugoslav-American economic relations since World War II. Duke University Press Books. p. 47. ISBN 0-8223-1061-9.
  179. Miller, James (2007). "Taking Off the Gloves: The United States and the Italian Elections of 1948". Diplomatic History. 7 (1): 35–56. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7709.1983.tb00381.x.
  180. "CNN Cold War Episode 3: Marshall Plan. Interview with F. Mark Wyatt, former CIA operative in Italy during the election". CNN. 1998–1999. Archived from the original on 31 August 2001. Retrieved 11 January 2017.
  181. Brogi, Alessandro (2011). Confronting America: The Cold War Between the United States and the Communists in France and Italy. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press. ISBN 978-0-8078-3473-2.
  182. Daley, Jason (4 January 2017). "How Adlai Stevenson Stopped Russian Interference in the 1960 Election". Smithsonian. Retrieved 21 May 2019.
  183. Taylor, Adam (6 January 2017). "This Kremlin leader bragged about tipping a U.S. presidential election". The Washington Post. Retrieved 21 May 2019.
  184. Powers, Francis (2004). Operation Overflight: A Memoir of the U-2 Incident. Potomac Books, Inc. p. 152,159. ISBN 9781574884227.
  185. "Interview with Oleg Troyanowski", National Security Archive (November 15, 1998).
  186. Traugott (1979)
  187. Villafana (2017), p. 72.
  188. Martell (2018), p. 74.
  189. Villafana (2017), pp. 72–73.
  190. Martell (2018), pp. 74–75.
  191. Martell (2018), p. 75.
  192. "Mfi Hebdo". Rfi.fr. July 6, 2009.
  193. Abbott (2014), p. 16.
  194. Abbott (2014), p. 19.
  195. Rodgers (1998), pp. 16,20
  196. Prunier (2009), pp. 77, 83.
  197. Johnson, Loch (2007). Strategic Intelligence. Greenwood Publishing Group. ISBN 9780313065286. Retrieved 12 January 2017.
  198. Weitzer, Ronald. Transforming Settler States: Communal Conflict and Internal Security in Northern Ireland and Zimbabwe. pp. 1–206.
  199. "Database – Uppsala Conflict Data Program". UCDP. Archived from the original on 3 June 2013. Retrieved 9 October 2012.
  200. "On Board the Tiger". Rhodesia.nl. 9 October 1968. Archived from the original on 12 October 2012. Retrieved 9 October 2012.
  201. "RHODESIA PSYOP 1965". Psywarrior.com. Archived from the original on 2 October 2012. Retrieved 9 October 2012.
  202. Duignan, Peter (1986), Politics and Government in African States 1960–1985, Croom Helm Ltd, ISBN 0-7099-1475-X
  203. Raftopolous, Brian. Becoming Zimbabwe: A History from the pre-colonial period to 2008. pp. 1–298.
  204. Raeburn, Michael. We are everywhere: Narratives from Rhodesian guerillas. pp. 1–209.
  205. Doebler, Walter (22 July 2006). "Afrikaserie: Simbabwe (Africa Series: Zimbabwe)". newsatelier.de (in German). Ottersweier. Retrieved 19 October 2011.
  206. Time magazine, 1 August 1978: taking the chicken run Archived 30 September 2007 at the Wayback Machine
  207. Time magazine, 7 August 1978: Rhodesia faces collapse Archived 30 September 2007 at the Wayback Machine
  208. BBC "On this day" report :1 June 1979 Archived 15 November 2006 at the Wayback Machine.
  209. Southern Rhodesia (Annexation) Order in Council, 30 July 1923 which provided by section 3 thereof: "From and after the coming into operation of this Order the said territories shall be annexed to and form part of His Majesty's Dominions, and shall be known as the Colony of Southern Rhodesia."
  210. "Elections in Zimbabwe".
  211. "Zimbabwe African Peoples Union". ZAPU.
  212. "Photius.com, (info from CIA world Factbook)". Photius Coutsoukis. Retrieved 2008-01-20.
  213. Williams 1997, p. 5
  214. Ello (ed.), Paul (April 1968). Control Committee of the Communist Party of Czechoslovakia, "Action Plan of the (Prague, April 1968)" in Dubcek's Blueprint for Freedom: His original documents leading to the invasion of Czechoslovakia. William Kimber & Co. 1968, pp 32, 54
  215. Von Geldern, James; Siegelbaum, Lewis. "The Soviet-led Intervention in Czechoslovakia". Soviethistory.org. Archived from the original on 2009-08-17. Retrieved 2008-03-07.
  216. "Document #81: Transcript of Leonid Brezhnev's Telephone Conversation with Alexander Dubček, August 13, 1968". The Prague Spring '68. The Prague Spring Foundation. 1998. Retrieved 2008-01-23.
  217. Navrátil 2006, pp. 36 & 172–181
  218. Navrátil 2006, pp. 326–329
  219. Ouimet, Matthew (2003). The Rise and Fall of the Brezhnev Doctrine in Soviet Foreign Policy. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill and London. pp. 34–35.
  220. "Soviet Invasion of Czechoslovakia". Military. GlobalSecurity.org. 2005-04-27. Retrieved 2007-01-19.
  221. Grenville 2005, p. 780
  222. Chafetz, Glenn (1993-04-30). Gorbachev, Reform, and the Brezhnev Doctrine: Soviet Policy Toward Eastern Europe, 1985–1990. Praeger Publishers. p. 10. ISBN 0-275-94484-0.
  223. Čulík, Jan. "Den, kdy tanky zlikvidovaly české sny Pražského jara". Britské Listy. Retrieved 2008-01-23.
  224. Williams 1997, p. xi
  225. Goertz 1995, pp. 154–157
  226. Williams 1997, p. 164
  227. Kumar, Krishna (1998). Postconflict Elections, Democratization, and International Assistance. Lynne Rienner Publishers. ISBN 1-55587778-8, p. 114.
  228. "Government and Politics", Ethiopia (country study), Mongabay, retrieved 24 April 2014.
  229. "Quiet Coup Ends Reign of Selaisse".
  230. "BBC NEWS | Africa | Mengistu found guilty of genocide". news.bbc.co.uk. Retrieved 2017-01-08.
  231. Diana L. Ohlbaum, "Ethiopia and the Construction of Soviet Identity, 1974-1991." Northeast African Studies 1.1 (1994): 63-89. online
  232. Keneally, Thomas (27 September 1987). "In Eritrea". New York Times.
  233. "Wir haben euch Waffen und Brot geschickt". Der Spiegel. 3 March 1980.
  234. Tewolde, Bereket (22 January 2008). "Attempts to distort history". Shaebia. Archived from the original on 2008-11-17.
  235. "Mengistu Haile Mariam | president of Ethiopia". Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 2018-06-03.
  236. Harff, Barbara & Gurr, Ted Robert: "Toward an Empirical Theory of Genocides and Politicides", International Studies Quarterly 32(3), p. 364 (1988).
  237. "Genocides, Politicides, and Other Mass Murder Since 1945, With Stages in 2008". Genocide Prevention Advisory Network. Retrieved 22 July 2016.
  238. De Waal, Alexander (1991). Evil Days: Thirty Years of War and Famine in Ethiopia. Human Rights Watch. p. 175. ISBN 9781564320384. Retrieved 20 May 2015.
  239. Vaughan, Sarah (2003). "Ethnicity and Power in Ethiopia" (PDF). Archived 13 August 2011 at the Wayback Machine University of Edinburgh: Ph.D. Thesis. p. 168.
  240. Valentino, Benjamin A. (2004). Final Solutions: Mass Killing and Genocide in the Twentieth Century. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. p. 196. ISBN 0-8014-3965-5.
  241. Rothchild, Donald S. (1997). Managing Ethnic Conflict in Africa: Pressures and Incentives for Cooperation. Brookings Institution Press. pp. 115–116. ISBN 0-8157-7593-8.
  242. Vanneman, Peter (1990). Soviet Strategy in Southern Africa: Gorbachev's Pragmatic Approach. Stanford: Hoover Institution Press. pp. 41–57. ISBN 978-0817989026.
  243. Chan, Stephen (2012). Southern Africa: Old Treacheries and New Deceits. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press. pp. 42–46. ISBN 978-0300184280.
  244. Santos, Hélia (2008), "MPLA (Angola)", A Historical Companion to Postcolonial Literatures – Continental Europe and its Empires, Edinburgh University Press, p. 480, ISBN 9780748623945
  245. Georges A. Fauriol and Eva Loser. Cuba: The International Dimension, 1990, p. 164.
  246. Biography at MPLA website Archived 2011-01-22 at the Wayback Machine (in Portuguese)
  247. Stearns, Peter N.; Langer, William Leonard (2001). The Encyclopedia of World History: Ancient, Medieval, and Modern, Chronologically Arranged. p. 1065.
  248. Zemtsov, Ilya; Farrar, John (1989). Gorbachev: The Man and the System. p. 309.
  249. Aristide R. Zolberg University-in-Exile Professor of Political Science New School for Social Research, Astri Suhrke Professor of International Relations The American University, Sergio Aguayo Professor of International Studies El Colegio de Mexico (1989). Escape from Violence: Conflict and the Refugee Crisis in the Developing World. p. 312.CS1 maint: uses authors parameter (link)
  250. Chester A. Crocker, Pamela R. Aall, and Fen Osler Hampson. Grasping The Nettle: Analyzing Cases Of Intractable Conflict, 2005. Page 218.
  251. Wright, George. The Destruction of a Nation: United States' Policy Towards Angola Since 1945, 1997. Page 159.
  252. Largo, p. 197
  253. Swann, p. 98
  254. Faure & Schwab, p. 58
  255. Thayer, p. 18
  256. Washington, Somoza and the Sandinistas: Stage and Regime in US Policy toward Nicaragua 1969–1981, Author: Morris H. Morley, Published: August 2002, ISBN 9780521523356, pg. 106
  257. Uppsala Conflict Data Program Conflict Encyclopedia, Nicaragua, State-based conflict, In depth, The Sandinista revolution, http://www.ucdp.uu.se/gpdatabase/gpcountry.php?id=117&regionSelect=4-Central_Americas# [link is not working]
  258. Trainor, Bernard E. (1988-02-06). "CONTRA AID CUTOFF: A SETBACK, NOT A DEATH BLOW". New York Times. Retrieved 2009-04-24.
  259. Kinzer, Stephen (28 March 1984). "Soviet Help to Sandinistas: No Blank Check". The New York Times.
  260. "The Sandinistas: Ideology and Domestic Politics". Understanding the Iran-Contra Affairs. Brown University.
  261. Osnos, Evan; Remnick, David; Yaffa, Joshua (24 February 2017). "Trump, Putin, and the New Cold War". The New Yorker. Retrieved 21 May 2019.
  262. Дубовицкий, Виктор. Особенности этнической и конфессиональной ситуации в Республике Таджикистан. Февраль 2003 Archived 2008-04-11 at the Wayback Machine
  263. "Tajikistan's Civil War: A Nightmare The Government Won't Let Its People Forget". RadioFreeEurope/RadioLiberty. Archived from the original on 5 June 2019. Retrieved 20 May 2019.
  264. Ahmed Rashid. Jihad: The Rise of Militant Islam in Central Asia. Orient Longman. Hyderabad. 2002.
  265. Tajikistan Civil War Archived 2007-04-14 at the Wayback Machine Global Security
  266. Shulman, Stephen; Bloom, Stephen (2012). "The legitimacy of foreign intervention in elections: the Ukrainian response". Review of International Studies. 38 (2): 445–471. doi:10.1017/S0260210512000022. Retrieved 12 January 2017.
  267. "Ukraine crisis: Crimea parliament asks to join Russia". BBC News. Retrieved 27 June 2015.
  268. "OSCE". Retrieved 27 June 2015.
  269. "Report on the human rights situation in Ukraine". Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. 15 April 2014.
  270. Jacobs, Harrison (11 April 2014). "The UN's Scathing Crimea Report Suggests Russia May Have Rigged Secession Vote". Business Insider. Archived from the original on 2 May 2014.
  271. "Hungarian Ambiance: Jobbik MEP Béla Kovács: The Crimean referendum is perfectly legitimate". Retrieved 27 June 2015.
  272. 16 March 2014, David Herszenhornmarch, The New York Times, "Crimea Votes to Secede From Ukraine as Russian Troops Keep Watch."
  273. "Backing Ukraine’s territorial integrity, UN Assembly declares Crimea referendum invalid". UN News Centre. 27 March 2014. Retrieved 28 March 2014.
  274. Clayton, Mark (17 June 2014). "Ukraine election narrowly avoided 'wanton destruction' from hackers". The Christian Science Monitor. Retrieved 16 August 2017.
  275. Watkins, Ali (14 August 2017). "Obama team was warned in 2014 about Russian interference". Politico. Retrieved 16 August 2017.
  276. Kramer, Andrew E.; Higgins, Andrew (16 August 2017). "In Ukraine, a Malware Expert Who Could Blow the Whistle on Russian Hacking". The New York Times. Retrieved 16 August 2017.
  277. "Clashes between Syrian troops, insurgents intensify in Russian-backed offensive". U.S. News & World Report. 8 October 2015. Retrieved 10 October 2015.
  278. "Officials: CIA-Backed Syrian Rebels Under Russian Blitz". The New York Times. 10 October 2015. Retrieved 10 October 2015.
  279. Dearden, Lizzie (8 October 2015). "Syrian army general says new ground offensive backed by Russian air strikes will 'eliminate terrorists'". The Independent. Retrieved 10 October 2015.
  280. "How Iranian general plotted out Syrian assault in Moscow". Reuters. 6 October 2015. Retrieved 14 October 2015.
  281. Manal. "Syria's ambassador to Russia urges all countries to join Syria and Russia against terrorism". Syrian Arab News Agency. Retrieved 28 October 2015.
  282. Путин назвал основную задачу российских военных в Сирии (in Russian). Interfax. 11 October 2015.
  283. "Russian Intervention in Syrian War Has Sharply Reduced U.S. Options". New York Times. 10 February 2016.
  284. "Assad and Putin Meet, as Russia Pushes to End Syrian War". New York Times. 21 November 2017.
  285. "How Russian special forces are shaping the fight in Syria". Washington Post. 29 March 2016.
  286. Американский Б-52 разбомбил сирийскую деревню Rossiyskaya Gazeta, 10 January 2017.
  287. "Russia establishing permanent presence at its Syria bases: RIA". Reuters. 26 December 2017.
  288. "Hackers lurking, parliamentarians told". Deutsche Welle. Retrieved 21 September 2016.
  289. "Hackerangriff auf deutsche Parteien". Süddeutsche Zeitung. Retrieved 21 September 2016.
  290. Holland, Martin. "Angeblich versuchter Hackerangriff auf Bundestag und Parteien". Heise. Retrieved 21 September 2016.
  291. "Wir haben Fingerabdrücke". Frankfurter Allgemeine. Retrieved 21 September 2016.
  292. "Slučaj "državni udar" i Đukanovićev "stari recept"".
  293. "Montenegrin prosecutor says Russian nationalists behind alleged coup plot".
  294. Montenegro PM Accuses Opposition Over 'Plot to Kill Him' Balkan Insight, 10 November 2016.
  295. Farmer, Ben (19 February 2017). "Russia plotted to overthrow Montenegro's government by assassinating Prime Minister Milo Djukanovic last year, according to senior Whitehall sources". The Telegraph. Retrieved 21 February 2017.
  296. "Kremlin rejects claims Russia had role in Montenegro coup plot". The Guardian. 20 February 2017. Retrieved 21 February 2017.
  297. Совбезными усилиями: Осложнение российско-сербских отношений потребовало вмешательства Николая Патрушева КоммерсантЪ, 28 October 2016.
  298. "Crnu Goru trese suluda priča o puču, ruskim špijunima, četnicima, Putinu i Vučiću. Naš reporter analizira sve". 27 November 2016. Retrieved 21 February 2018.
  299. Q&A: Duško Marković, the Prime Minister Stuck Between Putin and Trump in the Balkans Time, 16 February 2017.
  300. "Predrag Bogićević o puču u Crnoj Gori: Išao da štiti Srbe, ne da ruši režim". www.novosti.rs. Retrieved 21 February 2018.
  301. Кремлевский спрут. Часть 2. Как ГРУ пыталось организовать переворот в Черногории theins.ru, 24 March 2017.
  302. Организаторы переворота в Черногории участвовали в аннексии Крыма – СМИ Корреспондент.net, 21 November 2016.
  303. Gillett, Francesca (2 November 2017). "Electoral Commission launches probe into Russian meddling in Brexit vote using Twitter and Facebook". Evening Standard.
  304. 'UK investigates Brexit campaign funding amid speculation of Russian meddling' (1 November 2017) Reuters. 'The UK's election watchdog has now questioned Google over Russian meddling in Brexit' (28 November 2017) Business Insider. P Wintour, 'Russian bid to influence Brexit vote detailed in new US Senate report' (10 January 2018) Guardian
  305. Ackerman, Spencer; Thielman, Sam. "US officially accuses Russia of hacking DNC and interfering with election". The Guardian. Retrieved 7 October 2016.
  306. Perez, Evan; Schleifer, Theodore (18 October 2016). "US accuses Russia of trying to interfere with 2016 election". CNN. Retrieved 2019-05-21.
  307. Ryan, Missy; Nakashima, Ellen; DeYoung, Karen (29 December 2016). "Obama administration announces measures to punish Russia for 2016 election interference". The Washington Post. Retrieved 30 December 2016.
  308. Lee, Carol E.; Sonne, Paul (29 December 2016). "U.S. Sanctions Russia Over Election Hacking; Moscow Threatens to Retaliate". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 2019-05-21.
  309. Borger, Julian (7 January 2017). "UK intelligence gave US key tipoff about Russian hacking, report says". The Guardian. Retrieved 2019-05-21.
  310. Lawler, David (7 January 2017). "US concludes Vladimir Putin ordered campaign to influence US election 'after British intelligence tip-off'". The Daily Telegraph. Retrieved 2019-05-21.
  311. "Intelligence Report on Russian Hacking". The New York Times. 6 January 2017. p. 11. Retrieved 8 January 2017. We assess Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered an influence campaign in 2016 aimed at the U.S. presidential election. Russia’s goals were to undermine public faith in the U.S. democratic process, denigrate Secretary Clinton, and harm her electability and potential presidency. We further assess Putin and the Russian Government developed a clear preference for President-elect Trump. We have high confidence in these judgments.
  312. Eric Auchard (24 April 2017). "Macron campaign was target of cyber attacks by spy-linked group". Reuters.com. Retrieved 27 April 2017.
  313. "Putin awaits return on Le Pen investment". May 4, 2017. Archived from the original on May 5, 2017.
  314. "Russia-linked Hackers Target German Political Foundations". Handelsblatt. 26 April 2017.
  315. "Private military contractors linked to Russia are reportedly in Venezuela to protect Maduro". Business Insider. Retrieved 25 January 2019.
  316. Pardo, Paul (4 February 2019). "¿Cómo sería una invasión de Estados Unidos en Venezuela?". El Mundo (in Spanish). Retrieved 5 February 2019.
  317. "Russia denies sending mercenaries to protect Venezuela's president". South China Morning Post. 28 January 2019.
  318. "Russia warns against foreign interference in Venezuela". Anadolu Agency. 28 January 2019.
  319. "Russian air force planes land in Venezuela carrying troops: report". Reuters. 24 March 2019. Retrieved 24 March 2019.
  320. Zuñiga, Mariana and Anthony Faiola (30 March 2019). "As Maduro confronts a crisis, Russia's footprint in Venezuela grows: Moscow is seizing an opportunity to stick a finger in Washington's eye, experts say". The Washington Post via ProQuest.
  321. "Rusia abre centro de formación militar para pilotos de helicópteros en Venezuela". MSN (in Spanish). 29 March 2019. Retrieved 30 March 2019.
  322. Arostegui, Martin (10 April 2019). "US, EU at odds over Venezuela sanctions". VOA News. Retrieved 10 April 2019.
  323. "Venezuelan Socialist Party deputy confirms two planes landed from Russia". Reuters. 25 March 2019. Retrieved 26 March 2019.
  324. "Russia confirms its military personnel arrived in Venezuela". Washington Post. 27 March 2019. Retrieved 27 March 2019.
  325. "President Vladimir Putin had talks with Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez in the Kremlin". Kremlin.ru. 14 May 2001. Retrieved 28 March 2019. The Presidents were present at the ceremony of signing inter-governmental documents: an agreement on military-technical cooperation, on cooperation in fighting illegal drug trafficking and a protocol on creating a mechanism of political dialogue and cooperation between Russia and the Andes Community.
  326. "Guaidó sobre nuevo megaapagón: Hablan de sabotaje pero tienen militarizadas instalaciones eléctricas" (in Spanish). Efecto Cocuyo. 26 March 2019. Retrieved 26 March 2019.
  327. González, Ron (24 March 2019). "Militares rusos copan la escena en jornada libre para Maduro y Guaidó" [Russian military take over the stage on a free day for Maduro and Guaidó]. La Vanguardia (in Spanish). Retrieved 24 March 2019.
  328. "Russia's Deployment of Military Planes to Venezuela Sparks U.S. Backlash". The Moscow Times. 26 March 2019. Retrieved 26 March 2019.
  329. "Malta niega permiso de paso a aviones militares rusos". El Nacional (in Spanish). 19 April 2019. Retrieved 20 April 2019.
  330. "Russia describes Malta's refusal to allow planes to overfly air space as 'unfriendly'". The Independent Malta. 22 April 2019. Retrieved 25 April 2019.
  331. Grove, Thomas (2 June 2019). "In a Blow to Maduro, Russia Withdraws Key Defense Support to Venezuela". Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660. Retrieved 9 June 2019.
  332. "Trump: Russia told U.S. 'most of their people' have left Venezuela". Reuters. 3 June 2019. Retrieved 9 June 2019.
  333. "Rostec niega retirada de especialistas militares rusos de Venezuela". Efecto Cocuyo (in Spanish). 3 June 2019. Retrieved 9 June 2019.
  334. "Kremlin dismisses Trump tweet on alleged Venezuela withdrawal". Reuters. 4 June 2019. Retrieved 9 June 2019.
  335. "Moscow ready to send more military specialists to Venezuela if needed: RIA". Reuters. 7 June 2019. Retrieved 9 June 2019.
  336. "Russia to withdraw military 'technicians' from Venezuela on Wednesday: embassy". France 24. 26 June 2019.
  337. "Russian military specialists arrive in Venezuela to service equipment: Interfax". Reuters. 25 September 2019. Retrieved 2019-09-25.
  338. Barráez, Sebastiana (16 December 2019). "Los rusos instalaron equipos y drones en Venezuela con ayuda de un jefe indígena y la complicidad de militares chavistas" (in Spanish). Infobae. Retrieved 23 December 2019.
  339. Teslova, Elena (7 January 2020). "Russia praises election of Venezuelan parliament chief". Anadolu Agency. Retrieved 7 January 2020.
  340. "Rusia intenta negociar contratos petroleros con el parlamento controlado por Maduro". ABC (in Spanish). 2020-01-11. Retrieved 2020-01-11.
  341. Leon, Ibis (8 May 2020). "Agentes rusos rastrean a implicados en "Operación Gedeón" en Carayaca". Efecto Cocuyo. Retrieved 8 May 2020.
  342. Tucker, Eric (2020-02-24). "FBI official: Russia wants to see US 'tear ourselves apart'". Associated Press. Retrieved 2020-02-26. One intelligence official said lawmakers were not told that Russia was working directly to aid Trump. But other people familiar with the meeting said they were told the Kremlin was looking to help Trump's candidacy. The people spoke on condition of anonymity to discussed the classified briefing.
  343. Goldman, Adam; Barnes, Julian E.; Haberman, Maggie; Fandos, Nicholas (February 20, 2020). "Lawmakers Are Warned That Russia Is Meddling to Re-elect Trump". The New York Times. Retrieved February 26, 2020.
  344. Acosta, Jim; Cohen, Zachary; Bash, Dana; Herb, Jeremy (February 20, 2020). "Russia is looking to help Trump win in 2020, election security official told lawmakers". CNN. Retrieved February 26, 2020.
  345. Nakashima, Ellen; Harris, Shane; Dawsey, Josh; Gearan, Anne (February 20, 2020). "Senior intelligence official told lawmakers that Russia wants to see Trump reelected". The Washington Post. Retrieved February 26, 2020.
  346. Strohm, Chris (January 10, 2020). "U.S. Probes If Russia Is Targeting Biden in 2020 Election Meddling". Bloomberg News. Retrieved January 10, 2020.
  347. Kube, Courtney (February 12, 2020). "Russia will try to meddle in 2020 U.S. election, intelligence report says". NBC News. Retrieved February 12, 2020.
  348. "Bernie Sanders briefed by U.S. officials that Russia is trying to help his presidential campaign". The Washington Post. February 21, 2020.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.