Proclamation No. 1081

Proclamation No. 1081 was the document which contained formal proclamation of martial law in the Philippines by President Ferdinand Marcos, as announced to the public on September 23, 1972.[1][2]

This article is about the document formally placing the Philippines under Martial Law in 1972. For the actual implementation of Martial Law under Ferdinand Marcos from 1972 to 1986, see Martial law under Ferdinand Marcos.
Proclamation No. 1081
Ferdinand Marcos
Territorial extentPhilippines
Enacted byFerdinand Marcos
SignedSeptember 21, 1972
CommencedSeptember 23, 1972
Keywords
politics, martial law
Status: Repealed

The proclamation marked the beginning of a 14-year period that would last until Marcos left the country on February 25, 1986.[1][2] Even though the formal document proclaiming Martial Law – Proclamation No. 1081 – was formally lifted on January 17, 1981, Marcos retained essentially all of his powers as dictator until he was ousted after the EDSA Revolution in February 1986.[1][3][4]

Reasons

Numerous explanations have been put forward as reasons for Marcos to declare martial law in September 1972, some of which were presented by the Marcos administration as official justifications, and some of which were dissenting perspectives put forward by either the mainstream political opposition or by analysts studying the political economy of the decision.[5]

Official justifications

In his 1987 treatise, "Dictatorship & Martial Law: Philippine Authoritarianism in 1972", University of the Philippines Public Administration Professor Alex Brillantes Jr. identifies three reasons expressed by the Marcos administration, saying that martial law:[5]

  1. . was a response to various leftist and rightist plots against the Marcos administration;
  2. . was just the consequence of political decay after American-style democracy failed to take root in Philippine society; and
  3. . was a reflection of Filipino society's history of authoritarianism and supposed need for iron-fisted leadership.

The first two justifications were explicitly stated in the proclamation, which cited two explicit justifications: "to save the republic" (from various plots); and "to reform society" (after the failure of American-style democracy).[5] The third rationalization arose from the administration's propaganda, which portrayed Ferdinand Marcos as a hypermasculine figure able to compel the obedience of supposedly "spoiled" Filipinos.[5]

Incidents cited

Based on interviews of The Washington Post with former officials of the Communist Party of the Philippines, it was revealed that "the (Communist) party leadership planned – and three operatives carried out – the (Plaza Miranda) attack in an attempt to provoke government repression and push the country to the brink of revolution... (Communist Party) Chairman Sison had become convinced by early 1971 – less than three years after the party was founded – that it would take only a well-timed incident to spark a great upheaval leading to an early communist victory. Sison had calculated that Marcos could be provoked into cracking down on his opponents, thereby driving thousands of political activists into the underground, the former party officials said. Recruits were urgently needed, they said, to make use of a large influx of weapons and financial aid that China had already agreed to provide." [6]

1972 Bombings incidents cited in Proclamation No. 1081[7]
DatePlace
March 15 Arca Building on Taft Avenue, Pasay City
April 23 Filipinas Orient Airways boardroom along Domestic Road, Pasay City
May 30 Vietnamese Embassy
June 23 Court of Industrial Relations
June 24 Philippine Trust Company branch in Cubao, Quezon City
July 3 Philam Life building along United Nations Avenue, Manila
July 27 Tabacalera Cigar & Cigarette Factory compound at Marquez de Comilas, Manila
August 15 PLDT exchange office on East Avenue, Quezon City,
August 15 Philippine Sugar Institute building on North Avenue, Diliman, Quezon City
August 17 Department of Social Welfare building at San Rafael Street, Sampaloc, Manila
August 19 A water main on Aurora Boulevard and Madison Avenue, Quezon City
August 30 Philam Life building and nearby Far East Bank and Trust Company building
August 30 Building of the Philippine Banking Corporation as well as the buildings of the Investment Development Inc, and the Daily Star Publications when another explosion took place on Railroad Street, Port Area, Manila
September 5 Joe's Department Store on Carriedo Street, Quiapo, Manila
September 8 Manila City Hall
September 12 Water mains in San Juan
September 14 San Miguel building in Makati
September 18 Quezon City Hall

Dissenting perspectives

Dissenting perspectives from the political mainstream

Opposition to Marcos' declaration of martial law ran the whole gamut of Philippine society - ranging from impoverished peasants whom the administration tried to chase out of their homes; to the Philippines' political old-guard, whom Marcos had tried to displace from power; to academics and economists who disagreed with the specifics of Marcos' martial law policies. All of these, regardless of their social position or policy beliefs, subscribed to the interpretation that Marcos declared martial law:[5]

  1. . as a strategy to enable Ferdinand Marcos to stay in power past the two Presidential terms allowed him under Philippine Constitution of 1935
  2. . as a technique for covering up the ill-gotten wealth of Marcos, his family, and his cronies.

Dissenting economic interpretations

In addition, some critics who ascribe an economic component to Marcos' motivations,[5] suggesting that Martial Law:

  1. . was an acquiescence to the global market system, which required tight control of sociopolitical systems so that the country's resources could be exploited efficiently;
  2. . was a product of the infighting among the families that formed the upper socioeconomic class of Philippine society; and
  3. . was a connivance between the state powers and the upperclass families to keep the members of the country's lower classes from becoming too powerful.

Background

Philippine Military Academy instructor Lt. Victor Corpuz led New People's Army rebels in a raid on the PMA armory, capturing rifles, machine guns, grenade launchers, a bazooka and thousands of rounds of ammunition in 1970.[8] In 1972, China, which was then actively supporting and arming communist insurgencies in Asia as part of Mao Zedong's People's War Doctrine, transported 1,200 M-14 and AK-47 rifles [9] for the NPA to speed up NPA's campaign to defeat the government.[10][11] Prior to 1975, the Philippine government maintained a close relationship with the Kuomintang-ruled Chinese government which fled to Taiwan (Republic of China), despite the Chinese communist victory in 1949, and saw the People's Republic of China as a security threat due to its financial and military support of communist rebels in the country.[12]

Citing an intensifying communist insurgency,[10] a series of bombings, and the staged[13] fake[14][15] assassination attempt on then-Defense Minister Juan Ponce Enrile, President Marcos enacted the proclamation which enabled him to rule by military power.

Preparation of the document

While some historians believe Marcos' logistical and political preparations for proclaiming Martial Law began as early as 1965, when he took up the Defense Secretary portfolio for himself in an effort to curry the loyalty of the armed forces hierarchy,[16] the preparation for the actual document which became Proclamation 1081 began in December 1969, in the wake of Marcos' expensive 1969 presidential reelection bid. Marcos approached at least two different factions within his cabinet to study how the implementation of martial law should be structured in the proclamation.[16] [17]

Melchor and Almonte study

Some time in December 1969, Marcos asked Executive Secretary Alejandro Melchor and Melchor's aide-de-camp at the time, Major Jose Almonte, to study the different ways Martial Law had been implemented throughout the world, and the repercussions that might come from declaring it in the Philippines. The study submitted by Melchor and Almonte said that "while Martial Law may accelerate development, in the end the Philippines would become a political archipelago, with debilitating, factionalized politics."[17]

In Almonte, who would eventually become head of the head of the National Intelligence Coordinating Agency under President Corazon Aquino and later National Security Advisor to President Fidel Ramos, recalled in a 2015 memoir that he felt "the nation would be destroyed because, apart from the divisiveness it would cause, Martial Law would offer Marcos absolute power which would corrupt absolutely."[17]

Enrile study and draft of proclamation documents

Marcos, who kept up a strategy of keeping cabinet members from becoming too powerful by giving different factions different facts and redundant orders, also gave a similar task to Justice Secretary Juan Ponce Enrile that December. This time, he specifically asked what powers the 1935 Constittution would grant the President upon the declaration of Martial Law. According to Enrile's 2012 memoir, Marcos emphasized that "the study must be done discreetly and confidentially."[18] With help from Efren Plana and Minerva Gonzaga Reyes, Enrile submitted the only copy of his confidential report to Marcos in January 1970.[18]

A week after Enrile submitted his study, Marcos asked him to prepare the needed documents for implementing Martial Law in the Philippines.[18]

Signing of Proclamation No. 1081

Several conflicting accounts exist regarding the exact date on which Marcos signed the physical Proclamation No. 1081 document.[2][19] Differing accounts suggest that Marcos signed the document as early as September 10, 1972, or as late as September 25, 1972.[19]

Whichever the case, the document was formally dated 21 September because of his superstitions and numerological beliefs concerning the number seven.[19] The Official Gazette of the republic of the Philippines, in a restrospective article on Marcos' proclamation of Martial Law, comments on the differences in the accounts:

"Whether they conflict or not, all accounts indicate that Marcos’ obsession with numerology (particularly the number seven) necessitated that Proclamation No. 1081 be officially signed on a date that was divisible by seven. Thus, September 21, 1972 became the official date that Martial Law was established and the day that the Marcos dictatorship began. This also allowed Marcos to control history on his own terms.[19]"

Announcement of Martial Law

By the morning of September 23, 1972, Martial Law forces had successfully implemented a media lockdown, with only outlets associated with Marcos crony Roberto Benedicto allowed to operate. In the afternoon, the Benedicto-owned television channel KBS-9 went back on air playing episodes of Hanna-Barbera's Wacky Races cartoon series, which was interrupted at 3:00 PM when Press Secretary Francisco Tatad went on air to read Proclamation No. 1081, through which Marcos declared Martial Law.[20] Ferdinand Marcos himself went on air at 7:15 that evening to formalize the announcement. On the following Morning, September 24, the headline of Benedicto's Daily Express announced "FM Declares Martial Law" – the only newspaper to come out in the immediate aftermath of Martial Law.[1]

Implementation of Martial Law

Martial law was ratified by 90.77% of the voters during the controversial 1973 Philippine Martial Law referendum.[21][22]

After the constitution was approved by 95% of the voters in the Philippine constitutional plebiscite, the 1935 Constitution was replaced with a new one that changed the system of government from a presidential to a parliamentary one, with Marcos remaining in power as both head of state (with the title "President") and head of government (titled "Prime Minister"). Under the new government, President Marcos formed his political coalition–the Kilusang Bagong Lipunan (KBL; English: New Society Movement)–control the unicameral legislature he created, known as the Batasang Pambansa.

In an effort to isolate the local communist movement, President Marcos went to China in 1975 to normalize diplomatic relations. In return for recognizing the People's Republic of China as the legitimate government of China, and that Taiwan is part of Chinese territory, Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai pledged to stop supporting the Philippine communist rebels.[23]

The government subsequently captured NPA leaders Bernabe Buscayno in 1976 and Jose Maria Sison in 1977.[24] The Washington Post in an interview with former Philippine Communist Party Officials, revealed that, "they (local communist party officials) wound up languishing in China for 10 years as unwilling "guests" of the (Chinese) government, feuding bitterly among themselves and with the party leadership in the Philippines".[6]

Formal lifting

President Marcos formally lifted Martial Law on January 17, 1981, several weeks before the first pastoral visit of Pope John Paul II to the Philippines for the beatification of Lorenzo Ruiz. After the termination of Martial Law, the CPP-NPA was able to return to urban areas and form relationships with legal opposition organizations, and became increasingly successful attacks against the government throughout the country.[24]

General orders

General Order № 1 - The President proclaimed that he shall direct the entire government, including all its agencies and instrumentalities, and exercise all powers of his office including his role as the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of the Philippines.

General Order № 2 – The President directed the Minister of National Defense to arrest or cause the arrest and take into his custody the individuals named in the attached list and to hold them until otherwise so ordered by the President or by his duly designated representative, as well as to arrest or cause the arrest and take into his custody and to hold them otherwise ordered released by him or by his duly authorized representative such persons who may have committed crimes described in the Order.

General Order № 3 – The President ordered that all executive departments, bureaus, offices, agencies and instrumentalities of the National Government, government owned or controlled corporations, as well all governments of all the provinces, cities, municipalities and barrios should continue to function under their present officers and employees, until otherwise ordered by the President or by his duly designated representatives. The President further ordered that the Judiciary should continue to function in accordance with its present organization and personnel, and should try to decide in accordance with existing laws all criminal and civil cases, except certain cases enumerated in the Order.

General Order № 4 – The President ordered that a curfew be maintained and enforced throughout the Philippines from twelve o’clock midnight until four o’clock in the morning.

General Order № 5 – All rallies, demonstrations and other forms of group actions including strikes and picketing in vital industries such as in companies engaged in manufacture or processing as well as in production or processing of essential commodities or products for exports, and in companies engaged in banking of any kind, as well as in hospitals and in schools and colleges are prohibited.

General Order № 6 – No person shall keep, possess or carry outside of his residence any firearm unless such person is duly authorized to keep, possess or carry any such firearm except to those who are being sent abroad in the service of the Philippines.

See also

References
  1. Francisco, Katerina (2016-09-22). "Martial Law, the dark chapter in Philippine history". Rappler. Archived from the original on 2016-09-23. Retrieved 2018-06-29.
  2. "The Fall of the Dictatorship". Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines. Archived from the original on 2017-09-03. Retrieved 2018-09-09.
  3. Tan, Ab (1981-01-18). "Marcos Ends Martial Law, Keeps Tight Grip". Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved 2018-09-09.
  4. "Back to the Past: A timeline of press freedom". CMFR. Sep 1, 2007. Retrieved March 2, 2018.
  5. Brillantes, Alex B., Jr. (1987). Dictatorship & martial law : Philippine authoritarianism in 1972. Quezon City, Philippines: University of the Philippines Diliman School of Public Administration. ISBN 9718567011.
  6. "EX-COMMUNISTS PARTY BEHIND MANILA BOMBING". The Washington Post. August 4, 1989.
  7. gov.ph
  8. http://www.atimes.com/se-asia/CH30Ae02.html
  9. http://www.rappler.com/nation/60279-ak47-communist-rebels
  10. I-Witness, GMA 7 (November 18, 2013). "MV Karagatan, The Ship of the Chinese Communist". YouTube.
  11. http://www.philstar.com/entertainment/2012/07/30/832892/untold-story-karagatan-i-witness
  12. Zhao, Hong (2012). "Sino-Philippines Relations: Moving beyond South China Sea Dispute?". Journal of East Asian Affairs: 57. ISSN 1010-1608. Retrieved 6 March 2015 – via Questia.
  13. http://news.abs-cbn.com/blogs/insights/11/06/12/enrile-retracts-act-contrition-he-made-when-he-thought-he-was-facing-death-1
  14. Yamsuan, Cathy (September 30, 2012). "Enrile on fake ambush: 'For real'". GMA News.
  15. Research, Inquirer (October 8, 2012). "True or false: Was 1972 Enrile ambush faked?". Philippine Daily Inquirer.
  16. Kasaysayan : the story of the Filipino people, Volume 9. (1998) Alex Magno, ed. Pleasantville, New York: Asia Publishing Company Limited.
  17. Jose T. Almonte and Marites Dañguilan Vitug. (2015) Endless Journey: A Memoir. Quezon City: Cleverheads Publishing. page 77.
  18. Juan Ponce Enrile (2012) Juan Ponce Enrile: A Memoir. Quezon City:ABS-CBN Publishing Inc.p. 275.
  19. "Declaration of Martial Law". Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines. Archived from the original on 2017-07-08. Retrieved 2018-09-09.
  20. Chanco, Boo (2017-04-03). "Blame the messenger". The Philippine Star. Retrieved 2018-09-09.
  21. Schirmer, Daniel B.; Shalom, Stephen Roskamm (1987). The Philippines Reader: A history of Colonialism, Neocolonialism, Dictatorship and Resistance. South End Press. p. 191.
  22. Celoza, Albert F. (1997). Ferdinand Marcos and the Philippines: The Political Economy of Authoritarianism. Praeger Publishers.
  23. http://pascn.pids.gov.ph/files/Discussions%20Papers/1999/pascndp9916.pdf
  24. http://web.stanford.edu/group/mappingmilitants/cgi-bin/groups/view/149
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.