2003 Chicago mayoral election
The Chicago mayoral election of 2003 saw incumbent Mayor Richard M. Daley easily reelected against small and divided opposition, resulting in his best electoral showing of his career, winning by a landslide 64 point margin.
 | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| Turnout | 32.26%[1][2]  | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
.png)
| Elections in Illinois | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
By winning his fifth mayoral election, Daley tied Carter Harrison Sr. and Carter Harrison Jr. for the second-most mayoral election victories in Chicago history. Daley would subsequently win an additional mayoral election in 2007, thereby surpassing both Harrisons and tying his own father's record for the most mayoral election victories.
Campaign
On December 9, 2002, a spokesperson for Daley confirmed that Daley would be announcing his candidacy for reelection.[3] Daley's candidacy was widely anticipated.[3] A popular incumbent, Daley had won strong victories in the preceding four consecutive mayoral elections.[3]
All three of Daley's opponents were African Americans.[4][5][6][7] Both Jakes,[6] and McAfee[7] were clergy. McAllister was a businesswoman.[5]
Also briefly challenging Daley, but withdrawing from the race, had been James Meeks.[8]
All of Daley's opponents on the ballot had little electoral experience.[4] They struggled in fundraising and failed to receive backing from black leaders.[4] They also lacked name recognition.[4][3] Their prospects of unseating Daley were seen as dim.[5]
As was the case in all of his reelection campaigns, Daley did not attend any debates.[9]
Endorsements
Results
The election saw what was, up to that point, the lowest turnout in Chicago mayoral election history.[4] Daley won a majority of the vote in each of the city's 50 wards.[1]
| Party | Candidate | Votes | % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nonpartisan | Richard M. Daley (incumbent) | 363,553 | 78.46 | |
| Nonpartisan | Paul L. Jakes Jr. | 64,941 | 14.02 | |
| Nonpartisan | Patricia McAllister | 27,350 | 5.90 | |
| Nonpartisan | Joseph McAfee | 7,488 | 1.62 | |
| Write-in | Johnnie H. Barnes | 2 | 0.00 | |
| Write-in | Joel W. Britton | 1 | 0.00 | |
| Turnout | 463,335 | |||
Results by ward
| Ward[1] | Daley | Jakes | McAfee | McAllister | Total | Turnout % | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Votes | % | Votes | % | Votes | % | Votes | % | |||
| 1 | 5,892 | 84.49% | 501 | 7.18% | 119 | 1.71% | 462 | 6.62% | 6,974 | 26.93% |
| 2 | 5,632 | 70.05% | 1,745 | 21.70% | 125 | 1.55% | 538 | 6.69% | 8,040 | 28.78% |
| 3 | 4,930 | 61.97% | 2,163 | 27.19% | 183 | 2.30% | 680 | 8.55% | 7,956 | 32.67% |
| 4 | 6,153 | 62.21% | 2,688 | 27.18% | 194 | 1.96% | 856 | 8.65% | 9,891 | 35.54% |
| 5 | 5,693 | 62.54% | 2,445 | 26.86% | 198 | 2.18% | 767 | 8.43% | 9,103 | 31.79% |
| 6 | 7,457 | 58.08% | 4,008 | 31.21% | 294 | 2.29% | 1,081 | 8.42% | 12,840 | 34.70% |
| 7 | 5,610 | 61.39% | 2,547 | 27.87% | 234 | 2.56% | 748 | 8.18% | 9,139 | 28.26% |
| 8 | 8,484 | 61.34% | 3,816 | 27.59% | 390 | 2.82% | 1,142 | 8.26% | 13,832 | 35.80% |
| 9 | 6,012 | 61.13% | 2,781 | 28.28% | 221 | 2.25% | 820 | 8.34% | 9,834 | 27.94% |
| 10 | 6,867 | 89.86% | 412 | 5.39% | 92 | 1.20% | 271 | 3.55% | 7,642 | 28.43% |
| 11 | 12,129 | 95.90% | 207 | 1.64% | 79 | 0.62% | 233 | 1.84% | 12,648 | 57.78% |
| 12 | 4,405 | 92.85% | 123 | 2.59% | 49 | 1.03% | 167 | 3.52% | 4,744 | 39.60% |
| 13 | 12,168 | 94.26% | 291 | 2.25% | 105 | 0.81% | 345 | 2.67% | 12,909 | 54.22% |
| 14 | 5,455 | 95.22% | 101 | 1.76% | 37 | 0.65% | 136 | 2.37% | 5,729 | 44.55% |
| 15 | 4,125 | 66.23% | 1,492 | 23.96% | 101 | 1.62% | 510 | 8.19% | 6,228 | 23.81% |
| 16 | 3,868 | 66.10% | 1,371 | 23.43% | 130 | 2.22% | 483 | 8.25% | 5,852 | 24.64% |
| 17 | 5,847 | 62.39% | 2,573 | 27.45% | 192 | 2.05% | 760 | 8.11% | 9,372 | 28.14% |
| 18 | 10,018 | 72.75% | 2,717 | 19.73% | 179 | 1.30% | 857 | 6.22% | 13,771 | 39.95% |
| 19 | 16,882 | 83.86% | 1,704 | 8.46% | 383 | 1.90% | 1,161 | 5.77% | 20,130 | 56.35% |
| 20 | 4,290 | 62.23% | 1,855 | 26.91% | 180 | 2.61% | 569 | 8.25% | 6,894 | 28.90% |
| 21 | 8,391 | 59.35% | 4,371 | 30.92% | 270 | 1.91% | 1,105 | 7.82% | 14,137 | 33.56% |
| 22 | 3,043 | 84.69% | 281 | 7.82% | 47 | 1.31% | 222 | 6.18% | 3,593 | 24.24% |
| 23 | 13,925 | 91.52% | 526 | 3.46% | 190 | 1.25% | 575 | 3.78% | 15,216 | 51.65% |
| 24 | 5,151 | 59.04% | 2,695 | 30.89% | 173 | 1.98% | 705 | 8.08% | 8,724 | 26.97% |
| 25 | 6,353 | 86.51% | 472 | 6.43% | 110 | 1.50% | 409 | 5.57% | 7,344 | 39.12% |
| 26 | 4,959 | 83.51% | 499 | 8.40% | 100 | 1.68% | 380 | 6.40% | 5,938 | 27.03% |
| 27 | 5,307 | 71.06% | 1,548 | 20.73% | 118 | 1.58% | 495 | 6.63% | 7,468 | 26.03% |
| 28 | 4,380 | 60.57% | 2,156 | 29.82% | 131 | 1.81% | 564 | 7.80% | 7,231 | 23.21% |
| 29 | 7,735 | 71.67% | 2,286 | 21.18% | 119 | 1.10% | 652 | 6.04% | 10,792 | 37.73% |
| 30 | 5,450 | 90.94% | 231 | 3.85% | 65 | 1.08% | 247 | 4.12% | 5,993 | 31.59% |
| 31 | 4,885 | 91.84% | 166 | 3.12% | 57 | 1.07% | 211 | 3.97% | 5,319 | 27.18% |
| 32 | 6,709 | 88.68% | 399 | 5.27% | 105 | 1.39% | 352 | 4.65% | 7,565 | 23.25% |
| 33 | 6,218 | 91.47% | 253 | 3.72% | 68 | 1.00% | 259 | 3.81% | 6,798 | 41.07% |
| 34 | 7,472 | 61.44% | 3,498 | 28.76% | 267 | 2.20% | 924 | 7.60% | 12,161 | 30.51% |
| 35 | 6,723 | 83.01% | 647 | 7.99% | 149 | 1.84% | 580 | 7.16% | 8,099 | 36.45% |
| 36 | 9,860 | 91.02% | 439 | 4.05% | 135 | 1.25% | 399 | 3.68% | 10,833 | 37.39% |
| 37 | 4,841 | 63.81% | 2,045 | 26.96% | 121 | 1.60% | 579 | 7.63% | 7,586 | 25.42% |
| 38 | 8,656 | 91.56% | 321 | 3.40% | 132 | 1.40% | 345 | 3.65% | 9,454 | 35.07% |
| 39 | 7,229 | 91.83% | 268 | 3.40% | 91 | 1.16% | 284 | 3.61% | 7,872 | 33.59% |
| 40 | 5,831 | 89.28% | 338 | 5.18% | 64 | 0.98% | 298 | 4.56% | 6,531 | 30.82% |
| 41 | 12,766 | 87.55% | 688 | 4.72% | 293 | 2.01% | 835 | 5.73% | 14,582 | 40.50% |
| 42 | 9,281 | 90.01% | 499 | 4.84% | 119 | 1.15% | 412 | 4.00% | 10,311 | 30.60% |
| 43 | 6,062 | 89.85% | 363 | 5.38% | 84 | 1.24% | 238 | 3.53% | 6,747 | 19.97% |
| 44 | 8,939 | 89.26% | 457 | 4.56% | 136 | 1.36% | 483 | 4.82% | 10,015 | 30.47% |
| 45 | 12,026 | 90.35% | 474 | 3.56% | 207 | 1.56% | 604 | 4.54% | 13,311 | 44.54% |
| 46 | 8,804 | 83.57% | 938 | 8.90% | 167 | 1.59% | 626 | 5.94% | 10,535 | 38.26% |
| 47 | 10,706 | 86.46% | 757 | 6.11% | 173 | 1.40% | 746 | 6.02% | 12,382 | 40.22% |
| 48 | 7,434 | 85.76% | 697 | 8.04% | 103 | 1.19% | 434 | 5.01% | 8,668 | 32.81% |
| 49 | 5,275 | 78.40% | 797 | 11.85% | 126 | 1.87% | 530 | 7.88% | 6,728 | 33.72% |
| 50 | 7,061 | 91.89% | 280 | 3.64% | 79 | 1.03% | 264 | 3.44% | 7,684 | 35.41% |
References
- "2003 Municipal General - 2/25/03".
- "TABULATED STATEMENT OF THE RETURNS AND PROCLAMATION OF THE RESULTS OF THE CANVASS OF THE ELECTION RETURNS FOR THE MUNICIPAL GENERAL ELECTION HELD IN EACH OF THE PRECINCTS IN ALL THE WARDS IN THE CITY OF CHICAGO ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 2003 A.D." (PDF). Chicago Board of Elections. Retrieved 20 February 2020.
- "Chicago's Mayor Plans to Seek Re-election". The New York Times. The Associated Press. 9 December 2002. Retrieved 1 June 2020.
- Daley: A Retrospective: A Historical Exploration of Former Chicago Mayor Richard M. Daley by Chicago Tribune Staff Dec 18, 2012
- Daley Reign Continues In Chicago by Jarrett Murphy (Associated Press) February 26, 2003
- Jakes, a true believer, stands alone - Chicago Tribune
- Rev. Moon and the black clergy - Chicago Tribune
- Felton, Robert (10 January 2007). "Dorothy Brown reacts to criticism from Meeks". www.austinweeklynews.com. Austin Weekly News. Retrieved 16 June 2020.
- Chicago's Long-Running Daley Show Ken Rudin February 21, 2007
| By year | |
|---|---|
| Presidential |
|
| U.S. Senate | |
| U.S. House | |
| Special | |
| Gubernatorial | |
| State Senate | |
| State House | |
| State judicial | |
| Chicago mayoral |
|
| Chicago City Council | |
| Cicero municipal | |
| Cook County | |
| Peoria municipal | |
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.