Heathrow Airtrack

Heathrow Airtrack (proposed)
The current Terminal 5 station which would have formed part of Airtrack
Overview
Type Urban rail / Airport rail link proposal
System National Rail
Status Proposal only
Locale London, England, UK
Termini Heathrow Terminal 5
London Waterloo
Reading
Woking
Guildford
Stations 13
Operation
Owner Heathrow Airport Holdings (railway tracks around Heathrow Airport)
Network Rail (remainder of the network)
Technical
Track gauge 1,435 mm (4 ft 8 12 in)
Route map

Waterloo National Rail London Underground London River Services
Clapham Junction National Rail London Overground
Richmond National Rail London Underground London Overground
Twickenham
Feltham depot
Feltham
Staines
Heathrow Terminal 5 National Rail London Underground
Chertsey
Woking National Rail
Guildford National Rail
Bracknell
Wokingham
Reading National Rail

Heathrow Airtrack is a proposed railway link in the United Kingdom which would link Heathrow Airport in west London to London Waterloo railway station in Central London.

The line, as proposed by BAA, would run from Heathrow Terminal 5 across the suburbs of southwest London to Waterloo, with additional direct rail services from the airport to Reading and Guildford. Airtrack would provide an alternative route into London to the existing rail routes from Heathrow, Heathrow Express, TfL Rail and the Piccadilly line.

The scheme has been estimated to cost £673 million.[1] In April 2011, BAA announced that it would not proceed with the project,[2] citing the unavailability of government subsidy and other priorities for Heathrow.[3]

Various alternatives have since been proposed to Airtrack, including a revised plan called Airtrack-Lite put forward by Wandsworth Council in 2011,[4]

Plans

Heathrow Terminal 5 has two safeguarded heavy rail platforms for use by a west-facing connection to the National Rail network, which would be utilised by Airtrack. The original proposal for the AirTrack link[5] included a new station, called Staines High Street, built near the site of the former station of the same name, but that plan was omitted from the revised proposals in the second public consultation, published on 20 October 2008.[6]

A new rolling stock depot on the site of the former marshalling yards at Feltham is included in the proposal.

BAA indicated that they wished to extend the Heathrow Express service from Terminal 5 to a new terminal platform at Staines.[6]

Development of the proposal

The principle of a rail connection to Heathrow from the south had been the subject of considerable discussion and study for 50 years. Since 1960, there have been more than 10 studies or proposals that considered how to improve surface access to Heathrow by means of an additional fixed rail link, and in 1984 studies confirmed the viability of the link.[7]

Following a period of public consultation in 1998, BAA submitted plans on 24 July 2009 to the Secretary of State for Transport seeking authorisation under the Transport and Works Act to acquire the necessary land and begin constructing the rail link.

Work had been forecast to begin in 2011, with rail services operating by 2015.[8] On 30 July 2010 the Department of Transport wrote to all parties involved in the public inquiry, informing them that this had been delayed indefinitely. The reason cited was that "the Government has confirmed that its most urgent priority is to tackle the UK's budget deficit and that there will be a spending review in the Autumn. The review may have implications for the proposed funding of the Airtrack Scheme and until the position becomes clearer, we do not consider it appropriate to take matters forward...".[9]

In the event, Airtrack was not mentioned in the spending review and, as a result, in November 2010 BAA announced that the "public inquiry remains deferred".[10]

Construction

The economic case considers Airtrack to be a low-cost option[11] as only 4 kilometres (2.5 mi) of new line would be required, mostly within Spelthorne. The remaining new infrastructure would consist of station improvements and associated facilities.

The key elements of construction work would be:[12]

  • Tunnelling from Heathrow Terminal 5 to Stanwell Moor
  • Construction of a new rail line across Stanwell Moor and Staines Moor
  • Construction of a new section of track in Staines-upon-Thames town centre
  • Remodelling of Staines station
  • Building a train depot at Feltham

In 2008, the scheme was estimated to cost about £673 million,[1] of which about £150 million was expected to come from an operating surplus and the remainder from a government subsidy.

Services

The passenger services proposed for the Airtrack service are generally to offer a half-hourly service to each destination:[6]

London Waterloo – Heathrow: two trains per hour, stopping at:

  • Clapham Junction
  • Richmond
  • Twickenham
  • Feltham
  • Staines

An extension of the Heathrow Express service to Staines-upon-Thames would provide an additional 2tph between the airport and Staines-upon-Thames. Journey time from Waterloo to Heathrow would have been approximately 40 minutes.[13]

Guildford – Heathrow (via Egham and Virginia Water): two trains per hour (one per hour at peak times), stopping at:

  • Chertsey
  • Woking

Journey time from Guildford to Heathrow would be approximately 36 minutes.[13]

Reading – Heathrow (via Egham and Virginia Water) two trains per hour, stopping at:

  • Wokingham
  • Bracknell

Journey time from Reading to Heathrow would be approximately 45 minutes.[13]

Support and opposition

Concerns were raised about planned construction on Stanwell Moor
Egham Hythe Thorpe Road level crossing
Waterloo Road level crossing, Wokingham

In 2000, a group of local authorities, businesses and community organisations from Surrey, London and Berkshire called AirTrack Forum was formed by British Airways to support the Airtrack scheme. The group commissioned consultants to study the economic benefits of the scheme funded by the (now defunct) South East England Regional Assembly.[14][15] A number of local authorities have expressed broad support for Airtrack, among them Runnymede, Reading, Woking, Guildford, Bracknell Forest, Wokingham, Surrey and Hampshire County Councils, along with Transport for London and the Mayor of London.[16]

Some authorities have expresses concerns or objected to certain details of the plans, such as Wokingham,[17] Although it had previously objected, Surrey County Council revised its position after BAA offered to fund £11 million of transport improvements.[18][19] The move was criticised by the local MP and Secretary of State for Transport Philip Hammond.[20] The Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead expressed "strong concerns" about Airtrack.[21]

Environment

Most of the construction work would have affected Staines Moor and Stanwell Moor, which include a Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI), and extensive consultations took place in Spelthorne resulting in major modifications of the scheme.[12] Residents of Feltham expressed opposition to plans for a new train depot close to a natural conservation area.[22] In response to these concerns, BAA published assurances in their consultation literature that the Feltham depot would have been designed to limit noise and light pollution, and with landscape screening.[12]

Level crossings

A large part of the proposed Airtrack route would run on the Waterloo–Reading line which has fifteen level crossings. Opponents of Heathrow Airtrack have expressed concerns about the impact of the scheme on these crossings and local campaigners have that claimed more frequent trains would increase waiting times at closed barriers and detrimentally affect traffic congestion.[12] Level crossing locations along the route that could have been adversely affected included Egham[23][24] and Wokingham.[25][26]

According to an Environmental Statement issued by BAA, Airtrack would have had a slight impact on eight crossings, with barrier closure times increasing by no more than 13%; three crossings would have been moderately affected, with closure time increases of between 13% and 25%; and four crossings would have been "severely" affected, with barrier downtime increasing by between 25% and 36%.[27] Wokingham Borough Council objected to BAA's plans on the grounds that no proper impact assessment had been carried out on level crossing dwell times.[17] BAA investigated the possibility of constructing new road bridges or tunnels to mitigate problems with level crossings.[6]

Future plans

A number of new proposals for expanding transport at Heathrow Airport have been put forward, and among them are schemes closely related to Airtrack.

Airtrack-Lite

In October 2011 Wandsworth Council announced a revised plan called Airtrack-Lite. To address some of the concerns, this proposes that the Waterloo to Windsor service would divide at Staines-upon-Thames, and the service from Weybridge to London (via the Hounslow loop) would be recast as Weybridge to Heathrow and Heathrow to London services.[4]

In March 2013, Wandsworth Council initiated a study into providing a 30-minute rail journey from Clapham Junction to Heathrow.[28]

Aviation Policy Framework proposal

A new rail link proposal was included in the government's 2012 High Level Output Specification for rail. The proposed line would use a west-facing connection near Slough, which would allow through trains to serve the airport from South Wales and Bristol if a business case could be established.[29]

A variation of Airtrack-Lite is also used by the Windsor Link Railway, with a new link to Terminal 5 from a triangle at Wraysbury, providing both a northwest and a southwest rail link to Heathrow, with a bridge over the M25 avoiding the cost of tunneling associated with Airtrack.

Heathrow Southern Railway

A rival unrelated proposal, Heathrow Southern Railway, was announced in 2017.[30]

Third runway

In 2016 the Aitrack plans were restated as part of improvements linked to the proposed third runway at Heathrow.[31][12]

See also

References

  1. 1 2 "The Heathrow Airtrack Order: Estimate of Costs of Carrying out the Proposed Works" (PDF). BAA Heathrow Airport. 2008. Retrieved 6 January 2010.
  2. "Heathrow Airtrack Waterloo rail link shelved by BAA". BBC News London. 11 April 2011. Retrieved 11 April 2011.
  3. Samuel, A. (11 April 2011). "Heathrow: 'No option but to withdraw proposed Airtrack link to Staines'". Rail News from Rail.co. Retrieved 11 April 2011.
  4. 1 2 "New Airtrack plan to connect Heathrow". Wandsworth Council. 28 October 2011. Retrieved 5 September 2013.
  5. "Improving public transport access to Heathrow Airport, Consultation brochure 1" (PDF) (Press release). BAA Heathrow Airport. February 2008. Retrieved 3 March 2008.
  6. 1 2 3 4 "Improving public transport access to Heathrow Airport - Consultation brochure 2" (PDF) (Press release). BAA Heathrow Airport. October 2008. Retrieved 10 October 2008.
  7. "The AirTrack Forum - History". Archived from the original on 2009-09-06. Retrieved 5 September 2013.
  8. "Heathrow's vision for future rail access". BAA Heathrow Airport. 11 April 2011. Archived from the original on 2 July 2012. Retrieved 5 September 2013.
  9. "Department of Transport". wokingham-airtrack.org. Retrieved 7 August 2010.
  10. "Heathrow Airtrack". BAA Heathrow Official airport website. Retrieved 27 January 2011.
  11. "Wider Economic Impacts of Airtrack - Final Report" (PDF). Steer Davies Gleave, consultants. December 2007. Retrieved 6 January 2010.
  12. 1 2 3 4 5 "Improving public transport access to Heathrow Airport - Update 1, Response to Consultation" (PDF) (Press release). BAA. Summer 2009. Retrieved 6 January 2010.
  13. 1 2 3 "Aitrack Forum: Proposed Services". Archived from the original on 2008-10-27. Retrieved 5 September 2013.
  14. "About Us". Airtrack Forum. Archived from the original on 2005-12-17. Retrieved 5 September 2013.
  15. "Airtrack Latest News" (Press release). AirTrack Forum. Archived from the original on 2005-12-17. Retrieved 5 September 2013.
  16. "Supplementary memorandum submitted by BAA Limited (PEAT 07A)". House of Commons Select Committee on Transport. May 2007. Archived from the original on 5 June 2011. Retrieved 6 January 2010.
  17. 1 2 "Section 3.1.3 Wokingham Borough Council Objection". Wokingham Borough Council. 16 Sep 2009. Archived from the original on 20 July 2011. Retrieved 6 January 2010.
  18. "Surrey County Council considers Airtrack U-turn". BBC News. 2010-09-29. Retrieved 5 September 2013.
  19. Butt, Russell (2010-09-29). "Residents 'sold down the river' over Airtrack". Surrey Advertiser. Retrieved 5 September 2013.
  20. Butt, Russell (2010-10-07). "MP's county council 'bribe' jibe over Airtrack". Surrey Advertiser. Retrieved 5 September 2013.
  21. "Borough's strong concerns about BAA Airtrack proposals" (Press release). The Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead. 2009-08-19. Archived from the original on 21 July 2011. Retrieved 5 September 2013.
  22. "Residents deliver petition to Downing Street opposing Airtack scheme". Richmond & Twickenham Times. 24 June 2009. Retrieved 6 January 2010.
  23. "Level Crossings and Egham". Egham Chamber of Commerce. Retrieved 6 January 2010. (Egham Airtrack campaigning website)
  24. "Rail link 'brings traffic delays'". BBC News. 4 December 2008. Retrieved 6 January 2010.
  25. Fort, Hugh (19 November 2008). "Airport link could create 'chaos'". The Wokingham Times. Retrieved 6 January 2010.
  26. "Wokingham station will need overhaul to cope with Airtrack". The Wokingham Times. 31 July 2009. Retrieved 6 January 2010.
  27. Giesler, Nick (2009). "Heathrow Airtrack Environmental Statement Volume 2: Effects at Road Level Crossings" (PDF). Temple Group Ltd. Archived from the original (PDF) on 21 July 2011. Retrieved 6 January 2010.
  28. "Report by the Chief Executive and Director of Administration (on behalf of all officers concerned) on the Proposed South London – Heathrow Rail Link Project" (PDF). Retrieved 5 September 2013.
  29. "New rail link included in DfT aviation plans | Railnews | Today's news for Tomorrow's railway". Railnews. 2012-07-13. Retrieved 5 September 2013.
  30. "Heathrow Rail". Retrieved 1 Jan 2018.
  31. "New rail route would link Heathrow with Waterloo in 43 minutes". Get West London. Retrieved 17 January 2016.
  • "Heathrow Airtrack". BAA Heathrow. Archived from the original on 6 February 2009.
  • AirTrack Forum website
  • Wokingham objection website
  • Egham-Airtrack.co.uk
  • "Egham Airtrack". Archived from the original on 10 October 2010. (opposition campaign website)
  • TWA Application, Environmental Statement Volume 2

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.