Jainism

Jainism (/ˈnɪzəm/),[1] traditionally known as Jain Dharma, is an ancient Indian religion. Followers of Jainism are called "Jains", a word derived from the Sanskrit word jina (victor) referring to the path of victory in crossing over life's stream of rebirths by destroying karma through an ethical and spiritual life. Jainism is a transtheistic religion, and Jains trace their spiritual ideas and history through a succession of twenty-four leaders known as tirthankaras, with the first being Rishabhanatha, who according to Jain tradition lived millions of years ago, the twenty-third Tirthankara Parshvanatha in 900 BCE, and the twenty-fourth Tirthankara the Mahāvīra around 500 BCE. Jains believe that Jainism is an eternal dharma with the tirthankaras guiding every cycle of the Jain cosmology. Their religious texts are called Agamas.

The main religious premises of Jainism are ahiṃsā (non-violence), anekāntavāda (many-sidedness), aparigraha (non-attachment) and asceticism. Devout Jains take five main vows: ahiṃsā (non-violence), satya (truth), asteya (not stealing), brahmacharya (celibacy or chastity or sexual continence), and aparigraha (non-possessiveness). These principles have affected Jain culture in many ways, such as leading to a predominantly vegetarian lifestyle that avoids harm to animals, any micro-organisms and their life cycles. Parasparopagraho Jīvānām (the function of souls is to help one another) is the motto of Jainism. Ṇamōkāra mantra is the most common and basic prayer in Jainism.

Jainism has two major ancient sub-traditions, Digambaras and Śvētāmbaras; Several smaller sub-traditions emerged in the 2nd millennium CE. The Digambaras and Śvētāmbaras have different views on ascetic practices, gender and which Jain texts can be considered canonical. Jain mendicants are found in all Jain sub-traditions except Kanji Panth sub-tradition, with laypersons (śrāvakas) supporting the mendicants' spiritual pursuits with resources.

Jainism has between four and five million followers, with most Jains residing in India. Outside India, some of the largest Jain communities are present in Canada, Europe, Kenya, the United Kingdom, Hong Kong, Suriname, Fiji, and the United States. Jainism is also growing in Japan, where more than 5,000 ethnic Japanese families have converted to Jainism. Major Jain festivals include Paryushana and Daslakshana, Ashtanika, Mahavir Janma Kalyanak, and Dipawali.

Main principles

Non-violence (ahimsa)

Relief representing ahimsa
The hand symbolizes Ahiṃsā, the wheel dharmachakra, the resolve to halt saṃsāra (transmigration).

The principle of ahimsa (non-violence or non-injury) is a fundamental tenet of Jainism.[2] It believes that one must abandon all violent activity and without such a commitment to non-violence all religious behavior is worthless.[2] In Jain theology, it does not matter how correct or defensible the violence may be, one must not kill any being, and "non-violence is one's highest religious duty".[2][3]

Jain texts such as Acaranga Sūtra and Tattvarthasūtra state that one must renounce all killing of living beings, whether tiny or large, movable or immovable.[4][5] Its theology teaches that one must neither kill another living being, nor cause another to kill, nor consent to any killing directly or indirectly.[4][3] Furthermore, Jainism emphasizes non-violence against all beings not only in action but also in speech and in thought.[4][5] It states that instead of hate or violence against anyone, "all living creatures must help each other".[5][note 1] Violence negatively affects and destroys one's soul, particularly when the violence is done with intent, hate or carelessness, or when one indirectly causes or consents to the killing of a human or non-human living being.[5]

The idea of reverence for non-violence (ahiṃsā) is founded in Hindu and Buddhist canonical texts, and it may have origins in more ancient Brahmanical Vedic thoughts.[2][7][8] However, no other Indian religion has developed the non-violence doctrine and its implications on everyday life as has Jainism.[9][10][11]

The theological basis of non-violence as the highest religious duty has been interpreted by some Jain scholars not to "be driven by merit from giving or compassion to other creatures, nor a duty to rescue all creatures", but resulting from "continual self-discipline", a cleansing of the soul that leads to one's own spiritual development which ultimately affects one's salvation and release from rebirths.[12] Causing injury to any being in any form creates bad karma which affects one's rebirth, future well being and suffering.[13][14]

Late medieval Jain scholars re-examined the Ahiṃsā doctrine when one is faced with external threat or violence. For example, they justified violence by monks to protect nuns.[15][16] According to Dundas, the Jain scholar Jinadatta Suri wrote during a time of Muslim destruction of temples and persecution that "anybody engaged in a religious activity who was forced to fight and kill somebody would not lose any spiritual merit but instead attain deliverance".[17] However, such examples in Jain texts that condone fighting and killing under certain circumstances are relatively rare.[15][note 2]

Many-sided reality (anekāntavāda)

The second main principle of Jainism is anekāntavāda or anekantatva,[19][20] a word derived from anekānta ("not one ended, sided", "many-sidedness" or "manifoldness") and vada ("doctrine", "way").[19][20][21]

The anekāntavāda doctrine states that truth and reality are complex and always have multiple aspects. Reality can be experienced, but it is not possible to totally express it with language. Human attempts to communicate are Naya, explained as "partial expression of the truth".[19] Language is not Truth, but a means and attempt to express Truth. From Truth, according to Mahāvīra, language returns and not the other way round.[19][22] One can experience the truth of a taste, but cannot fully express that taste through language. Attempts to express the experience are syāt, or valid "in some respect" but remains "perhaps, just one perspective, incomplete".[22] In the same way, spiritual truths are complex, they have multiple aspects, and language cannot express their plurality, yet through effort and appropriate karma they can be experienced.[19] Since reality is many-sided, the great error, according to Jainism, is belief in ekānta (one-sidedness) where some relative truth is treated as an absolute truth and the complete reality, to the exclusion of others.[23]

The anekāntavāda premise of the Jains is ancient, as evidenced by its mention in Buddhist texts such as the Samaññaphala Sutta. The Jain Agamas suggest that Mahāvīra's approach to answering all metaphysical philosophical questions was a "qualified yes" (syāt).[24][25] These texts identify anekāntavāda doctrine to be one of the key differences between the teachings of the Mahāvīra and those of the Buddha. The Buddha taught the Middle Way, rejecting extremes of the answer "it is" or "it is not" to metaphysical questions. The Mahāvīra, in contrast, taught his followers to accept both "it is", and "it is not", with "perhaps" qualification and with reconciliation to understand the Absolute Reality.[26] Syādvāda (predication logic) and nayavāda (perspective epistemology) of Jainism expand on the concept of anekāntavāda. Syādvāda recommends the expression of anekānta by prefixing the epithet syād to every phrase or expression describing the "permanent being".[27][28] There is no creator God in Jainism; existence has neither beginning nor end, and the permanent being is conceptualized as jiva (soul) and ajiva (matter) within a dualistic anekāntavāda framework.[29]

According to Paul Dundas, in contemporary times the anekāntavāda doctrine has been interpreted by some Jains as intending to "promote a universal religious tolerance", and a teaching of "plurality" and "benign attitude to other [ethical, religious] positions". Dundas states this is problematic and a misreading of Jain historical texts and Mahāvīra's teachings.[30] The "many pointedness, multiple perspective" teachings of the Mahāvīra is a doctrine about the nature of absolute reality and human existence, and it is sometimes called "non-absolutism" doctrine.[31] However, it is not a doctrine about tolerating or condoning activities such as sacrificing or killing animals for food, nor violence against disbelievers or any other living being as "perhaps right".[30] The five vows for Jain monks and nuns, for example, are strict requirements and there is no "perhaps" or "that is just one perspective" about them.[32] Similarly, since ancient times, Jainism co-existed with Buddhism and Hinduism according to Dundas, but Jainism had a disagreement of the knowledge systems and ideologies of its rivals, and vice versa.[33]

Non-attachment (aparigraha)

The third main principle in Jainism is aparigraha which means non-attachment to worldly possessions.[34] For monks and nuns, Jainism requires a vow of complete non-possession of any property, relations and emotions.[35] The ascetic is a wandering mendicant in the Digambara tradition, or a resident mendicant in the Śvētāmbara tradition.[35] For Jain laypersons, it recommends limited possession of property that has been honestly earned, and giving excess property to charity.[34] According to Natubhai Shah, aparigraha applies to both the material and the psychic. Material possessions refer to various forms of property. Psychic possessions refer to emotions, likes and dislikes, and attachments of any form. Unchecked attachment to possessions is said to result in direct harm to one's personality.[36]

Jain ethics and five vows

Nishidhi stone, depicting the vow of sallekhana, 14th century, Karnataka

Jainism teaches five ethical duties, which it calls five vows. These are called anuvratas (small vows) for Jain laypersons, and mahavratas (great vows) for Jain mendicants.[37] For both, its moral precepts preface that the Jain has access to a guru (teacher, counsellor), deva (Jina, god), doctrine, and that the individual is free from five offences: doubts about the faith, indecisiveness about the truths of Jainism, sincere desire for Jain teachings, recognition of fellow Jains, and admiration for their spiritual pursuits.[38] Such a person undertakes the following Five vows of Jainism:

  1. Ahiṃsā, "intentional non-violence" or "noninjury":[38] The first major vow taken by Jains is to cause no harm to other human beings, as well as all living beings (particularly animals).[38] This is the highest ethical duty in Jainism, and it applies not only to one's actions, but demands that one be non-violent in one's speech and thoughts.[39][40]
  2. Satya, "truth": This vow is to always speak the truth. Neither lie, nor speak what is not true, and do not encourage others or approve anyone who speaks an untruth.[39][37]
  3. Asteya, "not stealing": A Jain layperson should not take anything that is not willingly given.[38][41] Additionally, a Jain mendicant should ask for permission to take it if something is being given.[42]
  4. Brahmacharya, "celibacy": Abstinence from sex and sensual pleasures is prescribed for Jain monks and nuns. For laypersons, the vow means chastity, faithfulness to one's partner.[39][37]
  5. Aparigraha, "non-possessiveness": This includes non-attachment to material and psychological possessions, avoiding craving and greed.[37] Jain monks and nuns completely renounce property and social relations, own nothing and are attached to no one.[34][43]

Jainism also prescribes seven supplementary vows, including three guņa vratas (merit vows) and four śikşā vratas.[44][45] The Sallekhana (or Santhara) vow is a "religious death" ritual vow observed at the end of life, historically by Jain monks and nuns, but rare in the modern age.[46] In this vow, there is voluntary and gradual reduction of food and liquid intake to end one's life by choice and with dispassion,[47][48] In Jainism this is believed to reduce negative karma that affects a soul's future rebirths.[49]

Practices

Asceticism and monasticism

Digambara monk
Śvētāmbara-Deravasi monk
A Śvētāmbara nun (early 20th-century)
A Digambara nun

Of all the major Indian religions, Jainism has had the strongest austerity-driven ascetic tradition, and it is an essential part of a mendicant's spiritual pursuits.[50][51][52] Ascetic life may include nakedness symbolizing non-possession of even clothes, fasting, body mortification, penance, and other austerities, in order to burn away past karma and stop producing new karma, both of which are believed in Jainism to be essential for reaching siddha and moksha ("liberation from rebirths" and "salvation").[50][53][54]

Jain texts like Tattvartha Sūtra and Uttaradhyayana Sūtra discuss ascetic austerities to great lengths and formulations. Six outer and six inner practices are most common, and oft-repeated in later Jain texts.[55] According to John Cort, outer austerities include complete fasting, eating limited amounts, eating restricted items, abstaining from tasty foods, mortifying the flesh, and guarding the flesh (avoiding anything that is a source of temptation).[56] Inner austerities include expiation, confession, respecting and assisting mendicants, studying, meditation, and ignoring bodily wants in order to abandon the body.[56]

Lists of internal and external austerities in Jainism varies with the text and tradition.[57][58] Asceticism is viewed as a means to control desires, and a means to purify the jiva (soul).[52] The tirthankaras of Jainism, such as the Mahāvīra (Vardhamana) set an example of leading an ascetic life by performing severe austerities for twelve years.[59][60][61]

Jainism monastic organization is a part of Jain society called sangh.[62] A sangh has a four-fold order, or caturvidh, sakal sangh.[62] This consists of sadhu (male ascetics, muni), sadhvi (female ascetics, aryika), śrāvaka (laymen), and śrāvikā (laywoman).[63][64] The latter two support the ascetics and their monastic organizations called gacch or samuday, in autonomous regional Jain congregations.[62]

Digambar tradition has two main monastic orders Mula Sangh and the Kashtha Sangh, both led by Bhattarakas. Other notable monastic orders include the Digambara Terapanth which emerged in the 17th century.[65] Śvētāmbaras have their own sanghs, but unlike Digambaras which have had predominantly sadhu sanghs (male monastic organizations), they have major sadhu and sadhvi sanghs (monks and nuns).[66]

According to Śvētāmbara Jain texts, from Kalpasūtras onwards, its monastic community has had more sadhvis than sadhus (female than male mendicants). In Tapa Gacch of the modern era, the ratio of sadhvis to sadhus (nuns to monks) is about 3.5 to 1.[67] In contrast to Śvētāmbara, the Digambara sect monastic community has been predominantly male.[68] In the Digambara tradition, a male human being is considered closest to the apex with the potential to achieve his soul's liberation from rebirths through asceticism. Women must gain karmic merit, to be reborn as man, and only then can they achieve spiritual liberation in the Digambara sect of Jainism.[69][70] The Śvētāmbaras disagree with the Digambaras, believing that women can also achieve liberation from Saṃsāra through ascetic practices.[70][71]

The Jain monastic organization shares many parallels with those found in Buddhist and Brahmanical-Hindu monasticism.[72][73] They all have similar rules, hierarchical structure, practices such as not traveling during the four-month monsoon season and celibacy.[73] According to William Johnston, this is not likely from mutual borrowing of ideas, but because these traditions emerged from the same ancient Indian monastic traditions that preceded the Buddha and the Mahāvīra.[72] There are some differences. For example, the Jain and Hindu monastic community has been traditionally more mobile and had an itinerant lifestyle, while Buddhist monks have favored belonging to a sangha (monastery) and staying in its premises.[74] Buddhist monastic rules forbid a monk to go outside without wearing the sangha's distinctive ruddy robe, or to use wooden bowls.[72] In contrast, Jain monastic rules have either required no clothes (Digambara) or white clothes (Śvētāmbara) and they have disagreed on the legitimacy of the wooden or empty gourd as the begging bowl by Jain monks.[72][lower-alpha 1] The Jain monastic rules have encouraged the use of mouth cover, as well as monastic equipment such as the Dandasan – a long stick with woolen threads – to gently remove ants and insects that may come in their path.[76][77][78]

Food and fasting

The practice of non-violence towards all living beings has led to Jain culture being vegetarian. Devout Jains practice lacto-vegetarianism, meaning that they eat no eggs, but accept dairy products if there is no violence against animals during their production. Veganism is encouraged if there are concerns about animal welfare.[79] Jain monks and nuns (sometimes extended to Jainism followers as well) do not eat root vegetables such as potatoes, onions, and garlic because tiny organisms are injured when the plant is pulled up, and because a bulb or tuber's ability to sprout is seen as characteristic of a higher living being.[80][note 3]

Jains fast on different occasions throughout the year, particularly during festivals.[81] This practice is called upavasa, tapasya or vrata.[82] According to Ram Bhushan Prasad Singh, this takes on various forms and may be practiced based on one's ability.[83] Some examples include Digambara fasting for Dasa-laksana-parvan where a Jain layperson eats only one or two meals per day, drinking only boiled water for ten days, or fasting completely on the first and last day of the festival.[84] With these practices, the layperson mimics the practices of a Jain mendicant during the festival.[84] A similar practice is found among Śvētāmbara Jains on eight day paryusana with samvatsari-pratikramana.[85] The fasting practice is believed to remove karma from one's soul and allow one to gain merit (punya).[81] A "one day" fast in Jain tradition lasts about 36 hours, starting at sunset before the day of the fast and ending 48 minutes after the sunrise the day after.[81] Among laypeople, fasting is more commonly observed by women, where it is believed that this shows her piety, religious purity, gains her and her family prestige leads to merit earning and helps ensure future well-being for her family. Some religious fasts are observed as a group where Jain women bond socially and support each other.[86] Long fasts are celebrated by friends and families with special ceremonies.[86]

Meditation

Left: Jain nuns meditating, Right: 10th-century Gommateshwara statue depicting standing meditation (Kayotsarga posture)

Jainism considers meditation (dhyana) a necessary practice, but its goals are very different from those in Buddhism and Hinduism.[87] In Jainism, meditation is concerned more with stopping karmic attachments and activity, not as a means to transformational insights or self-realization in other Indian religions.[87] According to Padmanabh Jaini, Sāmāyika is a practice of "brief periods in meditation" in Jainism that is a part of siksavrata (ritual restraint).[88] The goal of Sāmāyika is to achieve equanimity, and it is the second siksavrata.[note 4] The samayika ritual is practiced at least three times a day by mendicants, while a layperson includes it with other ritual practices such as Puja in a Jain temple and doing charity work.[89][90][91] According to Johnson, as well as Jaini, samayika connotes more than meditation, and for a Jain householder is the voluntary ritual practice of "assuming temporary ascetic status".[92][note 5]

Rituals and worship

Praying at the feet of a statue of Bahubali

There are many rituals in Jainism's various sects. According to Dundas, the ritualistic lay path among Śvētāmbara Jains is "heavily imbued with ascetic values", where the rituals either revere or celebrate the ascetic life of Tirthankaras, or mendicants, or progressively get closer to psychologically and physically living ever more like an ascetic.[94][95] The ultimate ritual is sallekhana, a religious death through ascetic abandonment of food and drinks.[94] The Digambara Jains follow the same theme, but the details differ from Śvētāmbaras, and according to Dundas, the life cycle and religious rituals are closer to the liturgy found among Hindu traditions.[94] The overlap in Jain and Hindu rituals is largely in the life cycle (rites-of-passage) rituals, according to Padmanabh Jaini, and likely one that developed over time because Jains and Hindus societies overlapped, and rituals were viewed as necessary and secular ceremonies.[96][97]

Jains do not believe in a creator god, but do ritually worship numerous deities.[95] The Jinas are prominent and a large focus of this ritualism, but they are not the only deva in Jainism. A Jina as deva is not an avatar (incarnation) in Jainism, but the highest state of omniscience that an ascetic tirthankara achieved.[98] Out of the 24 Tirthankaras, Jain devotional worship is predominantly addressed to four: Mahāvīra, Parshvanatha, Neminatha and Rishabhanatha.[99] Among the non-tirthankara saints, devotional worship is common for Bahubali among the Digambaras.[100] Some of Jain rituals remember the five life events of the tirthankaras, called the Panch Kalyanaka, are rituals such as the Panch Kalyanaka Pratishtha Mahotsava, Panch Kalyanaka Puja and Snatrapuja.[101][102]

Jain worship may include ritual offerings and recitals.[103]

The basic worship ritual practised by Jains is darsana (seeing) of deva, which includes Jina,[104] or other yaksas, gods and goddesses such as Brahmadeva, 52 Viras, Padmavati, Ambika and 16 Vidyadevis (Sarasvati, Lakshmi, others).[105][106][107] The Terapanthi sub-tradition of Digambaras do not worship many of the deities popular among mainstream Digambaras, and they limit their ritual worship to Tirthankaras.[108] The worship ritual is called the devapuja, is found in all Jain sub-traditions, which share common features.[109] Typically, the Jain layperson enters the temple inner sanctum in simple clothing and bare feet, with a plate filled with offerings, bows down, says the namaskara, completes his or her litany and prayers, sometimes is assisted by the temple priest, leaves the offerings and then departs.[109]

Jain practices include performing abhisheka (ceremonial bath) of the images.[110] Some Jain sects employ a pujari (also called upadhye) for rituals, who may be a non-Jain (a Hindu), to perform special rituals and other priestly duties at the temple.[111][112] More elaborate worship includes ritual offerings such as rice, fresh and dry fruits, flowers, coconut, sweets, and money. Some may light up a lamp with camphor and make auspicious marks with sandalwood paste. Devotees also recite Jain texts, particularly the life stories of the tirthankaras.[113][103]

The traditional Jains, like Buddhists and Hindus, believe in the efficacy of mantras and that certain sounds and words are inherently auspicious, powerful and spiritual.[114][115] The most famous of the mantras, broadly accepted in various sects of Jainism, is the "five homage" (panca namaskara) mantra which is believed to be eternal and existent since the first tirthankara's time.[114][116] The medieval era Jain worship practices, according to Ellen Gough, also developed tantric diagrams of the Rishi-mandala where the tirthankaras are portrayed.[117] The Tantric traditions within Jainism use mantra and rituals that are believed to accrue merit for rebirth realms.[118]

Festivals

Celebrating Das Lakshana (Paryusana), Jain Center of America, New York City

The most important annual Jain festival is called the Paryushana by Svetambaras and Dasa lakshana parva by the Digambaras. It is celebrated from the 12th day of the waning moon in the traditional lunisolar month of Bhadrapada in the Indian calendar. This typically falls in August or September of the Gregorian calendar.[119][120] It lasts eight days for Svetambaras, and ten days among the Digambaras.[119] It is a time when lay people fast and pray. The five vows are emphasized during this time.[120] Svetambaras recite the Kalpasūtras, while Digambaras read their own texts. The festival is an occasion where Jains make active effort to stop cruelty towards other life forms, freeing animals in captivity and preventing the slaughter of animals.[119]

Forgiveness

I forgive all living beings,
may all living beings forgive me.
All in this world are my friends,
I have no enemies.

Jain festival prayer on the last day[121]

The last day involves a focused prayer/meditation session known as Samvatsari. Jains consider this as a day of atonement, granting forgiveness to others, seeking forgiveness from all living beings, physically or mentally asking for forgiveness and resolving to treat everyone in the world as friends.[119] Forgiveness is asked by saying "Micchami Dukkadam" or "Khamat Khamna" to others. This means, "If I have offended you in any way, knowingly or unknowingly, in thought, word or action, then I seek your forgiveness." The literal meaning of Paryushana is "abiding" or "coming together".[122]

Mahavir Janma Kalyanak celebrates the birth of Mahāvīra. It is celebrated on the 13th day of the lunisolar month of Chaitra in the traditional Indian calendar. This typically falls in March or April of the Gregorian calendar.[123][124] The festivities include visiting Jain temples, pilgrimages to shrines, reading Jain texts and processions of Mahāvīra by the community. At his legendary birthplace of Kundagrama in Bihar, north of Patna, special events are held by Jains.[123] Dipawali is observed by Jains as the anniversary of Mahāvīra's attainment of moksha.[125] The Hindu festival of Diwali is also celebrated on the same date (Kartika Amavasya). Jain temples, homes, offices, and shops are decorated with lights and diyas (small oil lamps). The lights are symbolic of knowledge or removal of ignorance. Sweets are often distributed. On Diwali morning, Nirvan Ladoo is offered after praying to Mahāvīra in all Jain temples across the world. The Jain new year starts right after Diwali.[125] Some other festivals celebrated by Jains are Akshaya Tritiya and Raksha Bandhan, similar to those in the Hindu communities.[126][127]

Traditions and sects

Digambaras and Śvētāmbaras

The Jain community is divided into two major denominations, Digambara and Śvētāmbara. Monks of the Digambara (sky-clad) tradition do not wear clothes. Female monastics of the Digambara sect wear unstitched plain white sarees and are referred to as Aryikas. Śvētāmbara (white-clad) monastics, on the other hand, wear seamless white clothes.[128]

During Chandragupta Maurya's reign, Jain tradition states that Acharya Bhadrabahu predicted a twelve-year-long famine and moved to Karnataka with his disciples. Sthulabhadra, a pupil of Acharya Bhadrabahu, stayed in Magadha.[129] Later, when followers of Acharya Bhadrabahu returned, they found those who had remained at Magadha had started wearing white clothes, which was unacceptable to the others who remained naked.[130] This is how Jains believe the Digambara and Śvētāmbara schism began, with the former being naked while the latter wore white clothes.[131] Digambara saw this as being opposed to the Jain tenet of aparigraha which, according to them, required not even possession of clothes, i.e. complete nudity. In the 5th-century CE, the Council of Valabhi was organized by Śvētāmbara, which Digambara did not attend. At the council, the Śvētāmbara adopted the texts they had preserved as canonical scriptures, which Digambara has ever since rejected. This council solidified the historic schism between these two major traditions of Jainism.[132][133] The earliest record of Digambara beliefs is contained in the Prakrit Suttapahuda of Kundakunda.[134]

Digambara Mahāvīra iconography
Śvētāmbara Simandhar Swami iconography

Other than rejecting or accepting different ancient Jain texts, Digambaras and Śvētāmbara differ in other significant ways such as:

  • Śvētāmbaras trace their practices and dress code to the teachings of Parshvanatha, the 23rd tirthankara, which they believe taught only Four restraints (a claim, scholars say are confirmed by the ancient Buddhist texts that discuss Jain monastic life). Mahāvīra taught Five vows, which Digambara follow.[135][136][137] The Digambara sect disagrees with the Śvētāmbara interpretations,[138] and reject the theory of difference in Parshvanatha and Mahāvīra's teachings.[136]
  • Digambaras believe that both Parshvanatha and Mahāvīra remained unmarried, whereas Śvētāmbara believe the 23rd and 24th did indeed marry. According to the Śvētāmbara version, Parshva married Prabhavati,[139] and Mahāvīra married Yashoda who bore him a daughter named Priyadarshana.[140][141] The two sects also differ on the origin of Trishala, Mahāvīra's mother,[140] as well as the details of Tirthankara's biographies such as how many auspicious dreams their mothers had when they were in the wombs.[142]
  • Digambara believe Rishabha, Vasupujya and Neminatha were the three tirthankaras who reached omniscience while in sitting posture and other tirthankaras were in standing ascetic posture. In contrast, Śvētāmbaras believe it was Rishabha, Nemi and Mahāvīra who were the three in sitting posture.[143]
  • Digambara monasticism rules are more rigid.[144]
  • Digambara iconography are plain, Śvētāmbara icons are decorated and colored to be more lifelike.[144]

Excavations at Mathura revealed Jain statues from the time of the Kushan Empire (c. 1st century CE). Tirthankara represented without clothes, and monks with cloth wrapped around the left arm, are identified as the Ardhaphalaka (half-clothed) mentioned in texts. The Yapaniyas, believed to have originated from the Ardhaphalaka, followed Digambara nudity along with several Śvētāmbara beliefs.[145]

Other sub-traditions

Both of the major Jain traditions evolved into sub-traditions over time. For example, the devotional worship traditions of Śvētāmbara are referred to as Murti-pujakas, those who live in and around Jain temples became Deravasi or Mandira-margi. Those who avoid temples and pursue their spirituality at a designated monastic meeting place came to be known as Sthānakavāsī.[146][147] About the 18th century, the Śvētāmbara and Digambara traditions saw an emergence of separate Terapanthi movements.[147][148][149] Śvētāmbara Terapanth was started by Acharya Bhikshu in 18th century. In Terapanth there is only one Acharya, which is a unique feature of it.[150]

In the modern era, according to Flügel, new Jain religious movements that are a "primarily devotional form of Jainism" have developed which resemble "Jain Mahayana" style devotionalism.[151]The controversial Guru  the self-styled Bhagwan Rajneesh, was born in Jain Family, lived and taught in Pune for much of the 1970s and 1980s.

Gender and spiritual liberation

A male human being is considered closest to the apex with the potential to achieve liberation, particularly through asceticism. In the Digambara traditional belief, women must gain karmic merit, to be reborn as man, and only then can they achieve spiritual liberation.[69][70] However, this view has been historically debated within Jainism and different Jain sects have expressed different views, particularly the Śvētāmbara sect that believes that women too can achieve spiritual liberation from rebirths in Saṃsāra.[70][71] The Śvētāmbaras state the 19th Tirthankara Māllīnātha was female.[152] However, Digambara reject this, and worship Mallinatha as a male.[153]

Beliefs and philosophy

Dravya (Substance)

Chart showing the classification of dravya and astikaya

The dravya in Jainism are fundamental entities, called astikaya (literally, 'collection that exists').[154] They are believed to be eternal, and the ontological building blocks that constitute and explain all existence, whether perceived or not.[154][155]

According to the Śvētāmbara tradition of Jainism, there are five eternal substances in existence: Soul (jiva), Matter (pudgala), Space (akasha), motion (Dharma) and rest (Adharma).[156][note 6] To this list of five, the Digambara Jain tradition adds "Time" (kala) as the sixth eternal substance.[156][154][158] In both traditions, the substance of space is conceptualized as "world space" (lokakasha) and "non-world space" (alokiakasha). Further, both soul and matter are considered as active ontological substances, while the rest are inactive.[156] Another categorization found in Jain philosophy is jiva and ajiva, the latter being all dravya that is not jiva.[154][155]

Jiva means "soul" in Jainism, and is also called jivatman.[159] It is a core concept and the fundamental focus of the Jain theology.[154][160] The soul is believed to be eternal, and a substance that undergoes constant modifications, in every life, after every rebirth of a living being.[154][161] Jiva consists of pure consciousness in the Jain thought, has innate "free will" that causes it to act but is believed to be intangible and formless.[154] It is the soul that experiences existence and gains knowledge, not mind nor body both believed to a heap of matter.[162][163] Jain philosophy further believes that the soul is the mechanism of rebirth and karma accumulation. It is the same size in all living beings, such as a human being, a tiny insect and a large elephant. Jiva is everywhere, filling and infused in every minuscule part of the entire loka (realm of existence), according to Jainism.[162] The soul has the potential to reach omniscience and eternal bliss, and end the cycles of rebirth and associated suffering, which is the goal of Jain spirituality.[162][164]

The jiva is believed to rely on other dravya to function.[154] The Jain philosophy completely separates body (matter) from the soul (consciousness).[156] Souls reside in bodies and journey endlessly through saṃsāra (that is, realms of existence through cycles of rebirths and redeaths).[165] Ajiva consists of everything other than jiva.[166] Life processes such as breath means of knowledge such as language, all emotional and biological experiences such as pleasure and pain are all believed in Jainism to be made of pudgala (matter). These interact with tattva or reality to create, bind, destroy or unbind karma particles to the soul.[167][168] According to Dundas, Dharma as a metaphysical substance in Jain philosophy may be understood as "that which carries" instead of the literal sense of ordinary physical motion. Thus, dharma includes all verbal and mental activity that contributes to karma and purification of the soul.[169]

Tattva (Reality)

The 7 Tattvas of Jain philosophy

Tattva connotes "Reality, Truth" in Jain philosophy, and is the framework for salvation. According to Digambara Jains, there are seven tattvas, while Śvētāmbaras believe in nine tattvas:[170][171][167]

  • The sentient (jiva, soul)
  • The insentient (ajiva)
  • The karmic influx (Āsrava) to the soul
  • Good karma (punya, merits), found in the tattva theory of Śvētāmbara, but not of Digambaras
  • Bad karma (papa, negatives), found in the tattva theory of Śvētāmbara, but not of Digambaras
  • The bondage (Bandha) of karmic particles to the soul, thereby causing its change, which cumulatively determines the future rebirths[172][173]
  • The stoppage (Saṃvara) of karmic influx
  • The dissociation and wiping away of past karmic particles (Nirjarā) from the soul
  • The liberation (Moksha)

The true insight in Jain philosophy is considered as "faith in the tattvas".[171] The spiritual goal in Jainism is to reach moksha for ascetics, but for most Jain laypersons and ascetics it is to accumulate good karma that leads to better rebirth and a step closer to liberation.[174][175]

Soul and Karma

Classification of Saṃsāri Jīvas (transmigrating souls) in Jainism

According to Jainism, the existence of "abound and ever changing soul" is a self-evident truth, an axiom which does not need to be proven.[176] There are numerous souls, but every one of them has three qualities (Guṇa): consciousness (caitanya, the most important), bliss (sukha) and vibrational energy (virya).[177] The vibration draws karmic particles to the soul and creates bondages, but is also what adds merit or demerit to the soul.[177] Jain texts state that souls exist as "clothed with material bodies", where it entirely fills up the body.[178]

Karma, like in other Indian religions, connotes in Jainism the universal cause and effect law. However, it is envisioned as a material substance (subtle matter) that can bind to the soul, travel with the soul substance in bound form between rebirths, and affect the suffering and happiness experienced by the jiva in the lokas.[179] Karma is also believed to obscure and obstruct the innate nature and striving of the soul, as well as its spiritual potential in the next rebirth.[180]

The relationship between the soul and karma, states Padmanabh Jaini, can be explained with the analogy of gold. Like gold is always found mixed with impurities in its original state, Jainism holds that the soul is not pure at its origin but is always impure and defiled like natural gold. One can exert effort and purify gold, similarly, Jainism states that the defiled soul can be purified by proper refining methodology.[181] Karma either defiles the soul further, or refines it to a cleaner state, and this affects future rebirths.[182] Karma is thus an efficient cause (nimitta) in Jain philosophy, but not the material cause (upadana). The soul is believed to be the material cause.[183]

Saṃsāra

Souls are reborn in various realms of existence depending on their karmas, according to Jainism.

The conceptual framework of the Saṃsāra doctrine differs between the Jainism traditions and other Indian religions. For instance, in Jain traditions, soul (jiva) is accepted as a truth, as is assumed in the Hindu traditions. It is not assumed in the Buddhist traditions. However, Saṃsāra or the cycle of rebirths, has a definite beginning and end in Jainism.[184] The Jain theosophy, unlike Hindu and Buddhist theosophy, asserts that each soul passes through 8,400,000 birth-situations, as they circle through Saṃsāra.[185][186] As the soul cycles, states Padmanabh Jaini, Jainism traditions believe that it goes through five types of bodies: earth bodies, water bodies, fire bodies, air bodies and vegetable lives.[187] With all human and non-human activities, such as rainfall, agriculture, eating and even breathing, minuscule living beings are taking birth or dying, their souls are believed to be constantly changing bodies. Perturbing, harming or killing any life form, including any human being, is considered a sin in Jainism, with negative karmic effects.[188][189]

Souls begin their journey in a primordial state, and exist in a state of consciousness continuum that is constantly evolving through Saṃsāra.[190] Some evolve to a higher state; some regress asserts the Jain theory, a movement that is driven by the karma.[191] Further, Jain traditions believe that there exist Abhavya (incapable), or a class of souls that can never attain moksha (liberation).[184][192] The Abhavya state of soul is entered after an intentional and shockingly evil act.[193] Jainism considers souls as pluralistic each in a karma-samsara cycle, and does not subscribe to Advaita-style (not two) nondualism of Hinduism, or Advaya-style nondualism of Buddhism.[192] A liberated soul in Jainism is one who has gone beyond Saṃsāra, is at the apex, is omniscient, remains there eternally, and is known as a Siddha.[194]

Cosmology

Rebirth loka (realms of existence) in Jain cosmology.[195]

Jain texts propound that the universe consists of many eternal lokas (realms of existence). As in Buddhism and Hinduism, Jain cosmology believes both time and the universe are eternal without beginning and end, and that the universe is transient (impermanent in attributes) at the same time.[196][159] The universe, body, matter and time are considered in Jain philosophy as separate from the soul (jiva or jivatman). Their interaction explains life, living, death and rebirth.[159]

Division of time in Jain cosmology.

According to the Jain texts, the universe is divided into three parts, the upper, middle, and lower worlds, called respectively urdhva loka, madhya loka, and adho loka.[197] As with the realms of existences, Kāla (time) is without beginning and eternal;[158] the cosmic wheel of time, called kālachakra, rotates ceaselessly. According to Jain texts, in this part of the universe, there are six periods of time within two eons (ara), and in the first eon the universe generates, and in the next it degenerates.[198] Thus, the worldly cycle of time is divided into two parts or half-cycles, utsarpiṇī (ascending) and avasarpiṇī (descending).[158] Utsarpiṇī is a period of progressive prosperity, where happiness increases, while avasarpiṇī is a period of increasing sorrow and immorality.[199][200] According to Jain cosmology, it is currently the fifth ara of avasarpiṇī (half time cycle of degeneration). The present age is one of sorrow and misery, of religious decline, where the height and shape of living beings shrink. Jain thought holds that after the sixth ara, the universe will be reawakened in the new cycle and the start of utsarpiṇī aras.[201][202][203]

God

Jain miniature painting of 24 tirthankaras, Jaipur, c.1850

Jainism is a transtheistic religion.[204] According to Jainism, the universe was never created, nor will it ever cease to exist. It is independent and self-sufficient, does not require a creator nor any superior power to govern it, nor a judge nor destroyer.[159][205] In this belief, it is distinct from the monotheistic Abrahamic religions; it is similar to Buddhism. It shares premises with the non-theistic part of the spectrum of diverse beliefs found in different traditions within Hindu philosophy and distinct from theistic Hindu traditions.[206]

Jain texts reject the idea of a creator, ruler or destroyer god and postulate an eternal universe. However, Jainism believes in the world of gods and hell beings who are born, and who die to be reborn like living beings in the earthly realm of existence.[207][208] Those souls who live in the body of a god do so because of their positive karma. They have a metamorphic body, that is they are believed in Jain thought to be able to change their body at will. The gods live a life of happiness, fun and frolic, whose wishes are automatically fulfilled.[209] They also possess a more transcendent knowledge about material things and can anticipate events in the human realms.[209] However, once their past karmic merit is exhausted, the souls leave the "god body" and are reborn again as humans, animals or other beings.[209][210] In Jainism, perfect souls with the body are called arihant (victors) and perfect souls without the body are called Siddhas (liberated souls).[194][211][204]

Epistemology

Jain philosophy accepts three reliable means of knowledge (pramana). It holds that correct knowledge is based on perception (pratyaksa), inference (anumana) and testimony (sabda or the word of scriptures).[212][213] These ideas are elaborated in Jain texts such as Tattvarthasūtra, Parvacanasara, Nandi and Anuyogadvarini.[214][213] Some Jain texts add analogy (upamana) as the fourth reliable means, in a manner similar to epistemological theories found in other Indian religions.[215]

In Jainism, jnāna (knowledge) is said to be of five kinds Kevala Jnana (Omniscience), Śrutu Jñāna (Scriptural Knowledge), Mati Jñāna (Sensory Knowledge), Avadhi Jñāna (Clairvoyance), and Manah prayāya Jñāna (Telepathy).[216] According to the Jain text Tattvartha sūtra, the first two are indirect knowledge and the remaining three are direct knowledge.[217]

Salvation, liberation

The three shikhar (top) of a Jain temple represents Ratnatraya (three jewels)

According to Jainism, purification of soul and liberation can be achieved through the path of three jewels:[217][218][219]

  1. Samyak darśana (Correct View) Faith in basic tenets of Jainism, acceptance of the self-evident truth of soul (jīva)[220]
  2. Samyak jnana (Correct Knowledge) Knowledge of the tattvas without any doubt or misapprehension[221]
  3. Samyak charitra (Correct Conduct) behavior consistent with the Five vows[221]

Jain texts often add samyak tap (Correct Asceticism) as the fourth jewel, thereby emphasizing their belief in ascetic practices as the means to liberation (moksha).[222] The four jewels of orthodox Jain ideology are called moksha marg.[218] According to Jain texts, the liberated pure soul (Siddha) goes up to the summit of universe (Siddhashila) and dwells there in eternal bliss.[223]

Scriptures and texts

Stela depicting Śhrut Jnāna, or complete scriptural knowledge
The Suryaprajnaptisūtra, a 4th or 3rd century BCE astronomy text of Śvētāmbara Jains. Above: its manuscript from c.1500 CE.[224]
Mangulam inscription dated 2nd century BCE
Pravachanasara text along with English Translation
Tattvarthsutra text along with English Translation

Jain scriptures are called Agamas. They are believed to have been verbally transmitted by the oral tradition from one generation to the next, much like the ancient Buddhist and Hindu texts.[225] The Jain tradition believes that their religion is eternal, and the teachings of their first Tirthankara Rishabhanatha were their scriptures millions of years ago.[226] The mythology states that the tirthankara taught in a divine preaching hall called samavasarana, which were heard by the gods, the ascetics and laypersons. The discourse delivered is called Śhrut Jnāna and comprises eleven angas and fourteen purvas.[227] The discourse is remembered and transmitted by the Ganadharas (chief disciples), and is composed of twelve angas (departments). It is symbolically represented by a tree with twelve branches.[228]

According to the Jain tradition, an araha (worthy one) speaks meaning that is then converted into sūtra (sutta) by his disciples, and from such sūtras emerge the doctrine.[229] The creation and transmission of the Agama is the work of disciples in Jainism. These texts, historically for Jains, have represented the truths uttered by their tirthankaras, particularly the Mahāvīra.[229] In every cycle of Jain cosmology, twenty-four tirthankaras appear and so do the Jain scriptures for that ara.[226] The spoken scriptural language is believed to be Ardhamagadhi by the Śvētāmbara Jains, and a form of sonic resonance by the Digambara Jains. These then become coded into duvala samgagani pidaga (twelve limbed baskets by disciples), but transmitted orally.[225] In the 980th year after Mahāvīra's death (~5th century CE), the texts were written down for the first time by the Council of Valabhi.[230]

The Śvētāmbaras believe that they have the original Jain scriptures. The Śvētāmbara belief is denied by the Digambaras, who instead believe the scriptures were lost.[229][231] The Śvētāmbaras state that their collection of 45 works represent a continuous tradition, though they accept that their collection is also incomplete because of a lost Anga text and four lost Purva texts.[232] The Digambara sect of Jainism believes that Āchārya Bhutabali was the last ascetic who had partial knowledge of the original canon. According to them, Digambara Āchāryas recreated the oldest-known Digambara Jain texts, including the four anuyoga.[233][234][235] According to von Glasenapp, the Digambara texts partially agree with the enumerations and works of older Śvētāmbara texts, but in many cases, there are also gross differences between the texts of the two major Jain traditions.[231]

The Śvētāmbara consider their 45 text collection as canonical.[232] The Digambaras created a secondary canon between 600 and 900 CE, compiling it into four groups: history, cosmography, philosophy and ethics.[236] This four-set collection is called the "four Vedas" by the Digambaras.[236][note 7]

The most popular and influential texts of Jainism have been its non-canonical literature. Of these, the Kalpa Sūtras are particularly popular among Śvētāmbaras, which they attribute to Bhadrabahu (c. 300 BCE). This ancient scholar is revered in the Digambara tradition, and they believe he led their migration into the ancient south Karnataka region and created their tradition.[238] Śvētāmbaras disagree, and they believe that Bhadrabahu moved to Nepal, not into peninsular India.[238] Both traditions, however, consider his Niryuktis and Samhitas as important texts. The earliest surviving Sanskrit text by Umaswati called the Tattvarthasūtra is considered authoritative Jain philosophy text by all traditions of Jainism.[239][240][241]

In the Digambara tradition, the texts written by Kundakunda are highly revered and have been historically influential.[242][243][244] Other important Jain texts include: Samayasara, Ratnakaranda śrāvakācāra, and Niyamasara.[245]

Influence on Indian literature

Parts of the Sangam literature in Tamil are attributed to Jain authors. The authenticity and interpolations are controversial because the Sangam literature presents Hindu ideas.[246] Some scholars state that the Jain portions of the Sangam literature were added about or after the 8th-century CE, and they are not the ancient layer.[247]

Tamil Jain texts such as the Cīvaka Cintāmaṇi and Nālaṭiyār are credited to Digambara Jain authors.[248][249] These texts have seen interpolations and revisions. For example, it is generally accepted now that the Jain nun Kanti inserted a 445-verse poem into Cīvaka Cintāmaṇi in the 12th century.[250][251] The Tamil Jain literature, according to Dundas, has been "lovingly studied and commented upon for centuries by Hindus as well as Jains".[249] The themes of two of the Tamil epics, including the Silapadikkaram, have an embedded influence of Jainism.[249]

Jain scholars also contributed to Kannada literature.[252] The Digambara Jain texts in Karnataka are unusual, in that they were written under the patronage of kings and regional aristocrats. These Jain texts describe warrior violence and martial valor as equivalent to a "fully committed Jain ascetic". They thus set aside the religious premise of absolute non-violence, possibly reflecting an effort to syncretize various doctrines and beliefs found in Hinduism and Jainism.[253]

Jain manuscript libraries called bhandaras inside Jain temples are the oldest surviving in India.[254] Jain libraries, including the Śvētāmbara collections at Patan, Gujarat and Jaiselmer, Rajasthan, as well as the Digambara collections in Karnataka temples, have a large number of well-preserved manuscripts.[254][255] The manuscripts in the Jain libraries include Jain literature, as well as Hindu and Buddhist texts. Almost all their texts have been dated to about, or after, the 11th century CE.[256] The largest and most valuable libraries are found in the Thar Desert, hidden in the underground vaults of Jain temples. These collections have witnessed insect damage, and only a small portion of these manuscripts have been published and studied by scholars.[256]

Comparison with Buddhism and Hinduism

All three religions share concepts and doctrines such as karma and rebirth, and have similar ritual festival grammar, mythologies and monastic traditions.[257][258][259] They do not believe in eternal heaven or hell or judgment day. Jainism, like Buddhism and Hinduism, grants the freedom to choose beliefs such as in gods or no-gods, agree or disagree with core teachings, participate or not participate in prayers, rituals and festivals. They all consider ethical values such as non-violence to be important,[260] and link suffering to craving, individual's actions, intents, and karma, and believe spirituality is a means to enlightened peace, bliss and eternal liberation (moksha).[261][262]

Jainism differs from both Buddhism and Hinduism in its ontological premises. All of them believe in impermanence, but Buddhism incorporates, amongst other things, the premise of anatta ("non-self", "no eternal self or soul"). Hinduism incorporates the premise of an eternal unchanging atman ("self", "soul"), while Jainism incorporates the premises of a jiva ("self", "soul") that is both eternal and changing.[263][264][161] In Jain thought, there are infinite eternal jivas, predominantly all of which are in their cycles of rebirth, and a few who have liberated themselves through an ascetic life and become siddhas (a perfect one).[265] In contrast to Jainism, Hindu philosophies express a spectrum of views, ranging from nondualism where all souls are identical as Brahman and posited as interconnected one, to dualism where souls are same and have Brahman-nature but are different from Brahman, and to other ideas.[266][267][268]

While both Hinduism and Jainism believe "soul exists" to be a self-evident truth, most Hindu systems consider it to be eternally present, infinite and constant (vibhu), but some Hindu scholars proposed soul to be atomic. Hindu thought generally discusses Atman and Brahman through a monistic or dualistic framework. In contrast, Jain thought denies the Hindu metaphysical concept of Brahman, and Jain philosophy considers the soul to be ever changing and bound to the body or matter for each lifetime, thereby having a finite size that infuses the entire body of a living being.[269]

Jainism is similar to Buddhism in epistemically rejecting the Vedas and the Hindu metaphysical concept for Reality called Brahman. Jainism and Hinduism, however, both believe "soul exists" as a self-evident truth, and in their historic theology and practice have been more similar than with Buddhism.[270][261] Jains and Hindus have frequently intermarried over their history, particularly in northern, central and western regions of India.[271][272]

Some early colonial scholars stated that Jainism like Buddhism was, in part, a rejection of the caste system in Hinduism.[273][274] Later scholars, such as Gombrich state that this notion is an error for which "mainly Western authors are responsible".[275] A caste system has been a historic part of Jain society.[271][276][277] According to Vilas Adinath Sangave, "caste system is a universal feature of the Jain community", and the focus of Jainism has been the spiritual liberation of the individual rather than social reforms.[278][note 8] According to Padamnath Jaini, the 8th-century Digambara scholar Jinasena stated that Jain king Bharata, the son of first tirthankara named Rishabhanatha, invented the caste system by performing the ahiṃsā (non-violence) test, with Jain Brahmins being those who followed the non-violence precept.[281]

Jains agree with Hindus that violence in self-defence can be justified,[282] and they agree that a soldier who kills enemies in combat is performing a legitimate duty.[283] Jain communities accepted the use of military power for their defence, there were Jain monarchs, military commanders, and soldiers.[284]

Art and architecture

Ancient sculpture depicting Parshvanatha at Thirakoil, Tamil Nadu
Ayagapata, 200 CE, Kankali Tila, Mathura, Uttar Pradesh
Inscriptions at a Udaygiri-Khandagiri 1st-century BCE Jain rock cut cave, Odisha.[285]

Jainism has contributed significantly to Indian art and architecture. Jain arts depict life legends of tirthankara or other important people, particularly with them in a seated or standing meditative posture. Yakshas and yakshinis, attendant spirits who guard the tirthankara, are usually shown with them.[286] The earliest known Jain image is in the Patna museum. It is dated approximately to the 3rd century BCE.[286] Bronze images of Pārśva can be seen in the Prince of Wales Museum, Mumbai, and in the Patna museum; these are dated to the 2nd century BCE.[287]

Ayagapata is a type of votive tablet used in Jainism for donation and worship in the early centuries. These tablets are decorated with objects and designs central to Jain worship such as the stupa, dharmacakra and triratna. They present simultaneous trends or image and symbol worship. Numerous such stone tablets were discovered during excavations at ancient Jain sites like Kankali Tila near Mathura in Uttar Pradesh, India. The practice of donating these tablets is documented from 1st century BCE to 3rd century CE.[288][289][290] Samavasarana, a preaching hall of tirthankaras with various beings concentrically placed, is an important theme of Jain art.[291]

The Jain tower in Chittor, Rajasthan, is a good example of Jain architecture.[292] Decorated manuscripts are preserved in Jain libraries, containing diagrams from Jain cosmology.[293] Most of the paintings and illustrations depict historical events, known as Panch Kalyanaka, from the life of the tirthankara. Rishabha, the first tirthankara, is usually depicted in either the lotus position or kayotsarga, the standing position. He is distinguished from other tirthankara by the long locks of hair falling to his shoulders. Bull images also appear in his sculptures.[294] In paintings, incidents from his life, like his marriage and Indra marking his forehead, are depicted. Other paintings show him presenting a pottery bowl to his followers; he is also seen painting a house, weaving, and being visited by his mother Marudevi.[295] Each of the twenty-four tirthankara is associated with distinctive emblems, which are listed in such texts as Tiloyapannati, Kahavaali and Pravacanasaarodhara.[296]

Temples

Palitana
Mount Abu
Sonagiri
Kundalpur
Pawapuri
Bawangaja
Ranakpur
Khajuraho
Varanasi
Udayagiri
Kumbhoj
Osian
Halebidu
Guntur
Kulpakji
Mattancherry
Tirumalai
Pudukottai
Chitharal
Major pilgrimage and temple sites in Jainism.

A Jain temple, Derasar or Basadi is a place of worship for Jains.[297] Jain temples are built with various architectural designs,[298] but there are mainly two types of Jain temples:

  1. Shikar-bandhi Jain temple (one with a dome)
  2. Ghar Jain temple (Jain house temple – one without a dome).

There is always a main deity, also known as moolnayak, in every Jain temple placed inside a sanctum called "Gambhara" (Garbha Griha). A manastambha (column of honor) is a pillar that is often constructed in front of Jain temples.

There are 26 caves, 200 stone beds, 60 inscriptions, and over 100 sculptures in and around Madurai. This is also the site where Jain ascetics wrote great epics and books on grammar in Tamil.[299]

Ancient Jain monuments include the Udaigiri Hills near Bhelsa (Vidisha) in Madhya Pradesh, the Ellora in Maharashtra, the Palitana temples in Gujarat, and the Jain temples at Dilwara Temples near Mount Abu, Rajasthan.[300] Chaumukha temple in Ranakpur is considered one of the most beautiful Jain temples and is famous for its detailed carvings.[301][302] According to Jain texts, Shikharji is the place where twenty of the twenty-four Jain Tīrthaṅkaras along with many other monks attained moksha (died without being reborn, with their soul in Siddhashila). The Shikharji site in northeastern Jharkhand is therefore a revered pilgrimage site.[303][note 9] The Palitana temples are the holiest shrine for the Śvētāmbara Murtipujaka sect.[305] Along with Shikharji the two sites are considered the holiest of all pilgrimage sites by the Jain community.[306]

The Jain complex, Khajuraho and Jain Narayana temple are part of a UNESCO World Heritage Site.[307][308] Shravanabelagola, Saavira Kambada Basadi or 1000 pillars and Brahma Jinalaya are important Jain centers in Karnataka.[309][310][311][312]

The Udayagiri and Khandagiri Caves dating back to the 2nd–1st century BCE are dedicated to Jainism. They are rich with carvings of Jain tirthanakars and deities with inscriptions including the Hathigumpha inscription (Elephant Cave" inscription).[313][314] Jain cave temples at Badami, Mangi-Tungi and the Ellora Caves are considered important.[315]

The Sittanavasal Cave temple is regarded as one of the finest examples of Jain art. It is the oldest and most famous Jain centre in the region. It possesses both an early Jain cave shelter, and a medieval rock-cut temple with excellent fresco paintings comparable to Ajantha paintings; the steep hill contains an isolated but spacious cavern. Locally, this cavern is known as "Eladipattam", a name that is derived from the seven holes cut into the rock that serve as steps leading to the shelter. Within the cave there are seventeen stone beds aligned in rows; each of these has a raised portion that could have served as a pillow-loft. The largest stone bed has a distinct Tamil-Brahmi inscription assignable to the 2nd century BCE, and some inscriptions belonging to the 8th century BCE are also found on the nearby beds. The Sittannavasal cavern continued to be the Holy Sramana Abode until the 7th and 8th centuries. Inscriptions over the remaining stone beds name mendicants such as Tol kunrattu Kadavulan, Tirunilan, Tiruppuranan, Tittaicharanan, Sri Purrnacandran, Thiruchatthan, Ilangowthaman, Sri Ulagathithan, and Nityakaran Pattakali as monks.[316] The 8th century Kazhugumalai temple marks the revival of Jainism in South India.[317]

Pilgrimages

Jain Tirtha (pilgrim) sites are divided into the following categories:[318]

  • Siddhakshetra  Site of the moksha of an arihant (kevalin) or tirthankara, such as: Ashtapada, Shikharji, Girnar, Pawapuri, Palitana, Mangi-Tungi, and Champapuri (capital of Anga).
  • Atishayakshetra  Locations where divine events have occurred, such as: Mahavirji, Rishabhdeo, Kundalpur, Tijara, and Aharji.
  • Puranakshetra   Places associated with the lives of great men, such as: Ayodhya, Vidisha, Hastinapur, and Rajgir.
  • Gyanakshetra   Places associated with famous acharyas, or centers of learning, such as Shravanabelagola.

Outside contemporary India, Jain communities built temples in locations such as Nagarparkar, Sindh (Pakistan). However, according to a UNESCO tentative world heritage site application, Nagarparkar was not a "major religious centre or a place of pilgrimage" for Jainism, but it was once an important cultural landscape before "the last remaining Jain community left the area in 1947 at Partition".[319]

Statues and sculptures

Idol of Suparśvanātha

Jain sculptures are mainly images depicting tīrthaṅkaras. A sculpture could depict any of the twenty-four tīrthaṅkaras's images. Parshvanatha, Rishabhanatha and Mahāvīra are among the more popular. These tīrthaṅkaras usually depicted in the lotus position or kayotsarga.[320] Sculptures of chaumukha (quadruple) images are also popular in Jainism. Sculptures of Arihant, Bahubali, and protector deities like Ambika are also found. Tirthanakar idols look similar and are differentiated by the symbol belonging to each tirthanakar except Parshvanatha. Statues of Parshvanath have a snake crown on the head. There are a few differences between the Digambara and the Śvētāmbara depictions of idols.[321] Digambara images are naked without any beautification, whereas Śvētāmbara depictions are clothed and decorated with temporary ornaments.[321]

A monolithic, 18-metre (59-foot) statue of Bahubali, referred to as Gommateshvara, built in 981 CE by the Ganga minister and commander Chavundaraya, is situated on a hilltop in Shravanabelagola in the Hassan district of Karnataka state. This statue was voted first in the SMS poll Seven Wonders of India conducted by The Times of India.[322] The Statue of Ahiṃsā (depicting Rishabhanatha) was erected in the Nashik district in 2015; it is 33 m (108 ft) tall.[323] Idols made from Ashtadhatu (literally "eight metals), Akota Bronze, brass, gold, silver, stone monoliths, rock cut, and precious stones are popular in Jainism.[324][325]

A large number of ayagapata, votive tablets for offerings and the worship of tīrthankara, were excavated from Kankali Tila, Mathura. These sculptures date from the 2nd century BCE to the 12th century CE.[326]

Symbols

The Jain emblem
Jain Flag

Jain icons and arts incorporate symbols such as swastika, om, and the Ashtamangala.

The swastika is an important Jain symbol. Its four arms symbolise the four realms of existence in which rebirth occurs according to Jainism: humans, heavenly beings, hellish beings and non-humans (plants and animals).[327][328] This is conceptually similar to the six realms of rebirth represented by bhavachakra in Buddhism.[327] It is usually shown with three dots on the top, which represent the three jewels mentioned in ancient texts such as Tattvartha sūtra and Uttaradhyayana sūtra: correct faith, correct understanding and correct conduct. These jewels are the means believed in Jainism to lead one to the state of spiritual perfection, a state that is symbolically represented by a crescent and one dot on top representing the liberated soul.[329]

The hand with a wheel on the palm symbolizes ahimsā in Jainism with ahiṃsā written in the middle. The wheel represents the dharmachakra (Wheel of the Dharma), which stands for the resolve to halt the saṃsāra (wandering) through the relentless pursuit of ahimsā (compassion). In Jainism, Om is considered a condensed form of reference to the Pañca-Parameṣṭhi, by their initials A+A+A+U+M (o3m). According to the Dravyasamgraha by Acharya Nemicandra, AAAUM (or just Om) is a one syllable short form of the initials of the five parameshthis: "Arihant, Ashiri, Acharya, Upajjhaya, Muni".[330][331] The Om symbol is also used in ancient Jain scriptures to represent the five lines of the Ṇamōkāra Mantra.[332][333]

In 1974, on the 2500th anniversary of the nirvana of Mahāvīra, the Jain community chose one image as an emblem to be the main identifying symbol for Jainism.[334] The overall shape depicts the three loka (realms of rebirth) of Jain cosmology i.e., heaven, human world and hell. The semi-circular topmost portion symbolizes Siddhashila, which is a zone beyond the three realms. The Jain swastika is present in the top portion, and the symbol of Ahiṃsā in the lower portion. At the bottom of the emblem is the Jain mantra, Parasparopagraho Jīvānām. According to Vilas Sangave, the mantra means "all life is bound together by mutual support and interdependence".[335] According to Anne Vallely, this mantra is from sūtra 5.21 of Umaswati's Tattvarthasūtra, and it means "souls render service to one another".[336]

The five colours of the Jain flag represent the Pañca-Parameṣṭhi and the five vows, small as well as great:[337] The Ashtamangala are a set of eight auspicious symbols, which are different in the Digambara and Śvētāmbar traditions.[338] In the Digambara tradition, the eight auspicious symbols are Chatra, Dhvaja, Kalasha, Fly-whisk, Mirror, Chair, Hand fan and Vessel. In the Śvētāmbar tradition, these are Swastika, Srivatsa, Nandavarta, Vardhmanaka (food vessel), Bhadrasana (seat), Kalasha (pot), Darpan (mirror) and pair of fish.[338]

History

Rishabhdev, believed to have lived over a 101631 years ago, is considered the traditional founder of Jainism.

Ancient

Jain inscription of Ashoka (c.236 BCE)

Jainism is an ancient Indian religion,[lower-alpha 2] the origins of which are obscure.[340][341] The Jains claim their religion to be eternal, and consider Rishabhanatha, the first of 24 Jain tirthankaras to be the founder in the present time cycle.[342] Some Indian history scholars such as Parikh have hypothesized that images such as those of the bull in Indus Valley Civilization seal are related to Jainism.[343] Jainism, like Buddhism, is one of the Śramaṇa traditions of ancient India, those that rejected the Vedas.[344][345] According to the hypothesis of the philosopher Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan, Jainism was in existence before the Vedas were composed.[346][347] Jainism and Hinduism influenced each other. Jain texts declare some of the Hindu gods as blood relatives of legendary tirthankara. Neminatha, the 22nd tirthankara for example is presented as a cousin of Krishna in Jain Puranas and other texts.[348][349] However, Jain scholars such as Haribhadra also wrote satires about Hindu gods, mocking them with novel outrageous stories where the gods misbehave and act unethically.[350][351] The Hindu gods are presented by some Jain writers as persecuting, tempting, afraid of, or serving a legendary Jina before he gains omniscience. In other stories, the Hindu deities such as Vishnu, or Rama and Sita come to pay respect to a Jina at a major Jain pilgrimage site such as Mount Satrunjaya.[352]

Chaumukha Sculpture with Four Jinas (Rishabhanatha (Adinatha), Parshvanatha, Neminatha, and Mahavira), LACMA, 6th century

According to historians, the first 22 of the 24 tirthankaras were mythical figures.[353][354][355] The 23rd tirthankara, Parshvanatha, is generally accepted to be based on an ancient historic human being of uncertain dates,[356][357] possibly the eighth to sixth century BCE.[358][359] Mahāvīra and Buddha are generally accepted as contemporaries (circa 5th century BCE).[360][361] The interaction between Jainism and Buddhism began with the Buddha. Buddhist texts refer to Mahāvīra as Nigantha Nataputta.[362] Beyond the times of the Mahāvīra and the Buddha, the two ascetic sramana (seeker) religions competed for followers as well as the merchant trade networks that sustained them.[74][363] Their mutual interaction, along with those of Hindu traditions, have been significant. In some cases, the titles of the Buddhist and Jain texts are the same or similar but present different doctrines.[364]

Udayagiri and Khandagiri Caves built by King Kharavela of Mahameghavahana dynasty in 2nd century BCE

Jains consider the kings Bimbisara (c. 558–491 BCE), Ajatashatru (c. 492–460 BCE), and Udayin (c. 460–440 BCE) of the Haryanka dynasty as patrons of Jainism.[365] Jain tradition states that Chandragupta Maurya (322–298 BCE), the founder of the Mauryan Empire and grandfather of Ashoka, became a monk and disciple of Jain ascetic Bhadrabahu during later part of his life.[366][367][368] Jain texts further states that he died at Shravanabelagola by fasting, a Jain ascetic method of ending one's life by choice (Sallenkana vrata).[366][369][367] According to historians, Chandragupta's story appears in various versions in Buddhist, Jain, and Hindu texts.[370][371]

The 3rd century BCE emperor Ashoka, in his pillar edicts, mentions several ancient Indian religious groups including the Niganthas (Jain).[372] Statues of Jain tirthankara have been found dating back to the second century BC.[373] Archeological evidence suggests that Mathura was an important Jain center between the 2nd century BCE and the 5th century CE. Inscriptions from the 1st and 2nd century CE show that the schism between Digambara and Śvētāmbara had already taken place.[374] There is inscriptional evidence for the presence of Jain monks in south India by the second or first centuries BC, and archaeological evidence of Jain monks in Saurashtra in Gujarat by the second century CE.[375]

The Indra Sabha cave at the Ellora Caves, are co-located with Hindu and Buddhist monuments.

Royal patronage has been a key factor in the growth as well as the decline of Jainism.[376] According to a Jain legend, King Salivahana of the late 1st century CE was a patron of Jainism, as were many others in the early centuries of the 1st millennium CE. But von Glasenapp states that the historicity of these stories is difficult to establish.[377] In the second half of the 1st century CE, Hindu kings sponsored and helped build major Jain cave temples. For example, the Hindu Rashtrakuta dynasty started the early group of Jain temples.[378] King Harshavardhana of the 7th century grew up in Shaivism, following his family, but he championed Jainism, Buddhism and all traditions of Hinduism.[379] The Pallava King Mahendravarman I (600630 CE) converted from Jainism to Shaivism under the influence of Appar.[380] His work Mattavilasa Prahasana ridicules certain Shaiva sects and the Buddhists and also expresses contempt towards Jain ascetics.[381] The Yadava dynasty built many of the middle and later Jain group of temples at the Ellora Caves between 700 and 1000 CE.[382][383][384] King Ama of the 8th century converted to Jainism, and the Jain pilgrimage tradition was well established in his era.[385] Mularaja (10th century CE), the founder of Chalukya dynasty, constructed a Jain temple, even though he was not a Jain.[386] During the 11th century, Basava, a minister to the Jain Kalachuri king Bijjala, succeeded in converting numerous Jains to the Lingayat Shaivite sect. The Lingayats destroyed various temples belonging to Jains and adapted them to their use.[387] The Hoysala King Vishnuvardhana (c. 11081152 CE) became a follower of the Vaishnava sect under the influence of Ramanuja, after which Vaishnavism grew rapidly in what is now Karnataka.[388]

Medieval

The ruins of Gori Jain temples in Nagarparkar, Pakistan, a pilgrimage site before 1947.[389]

The Jain and Hindu communities have often been very close and mutually accepting. Some Hindu temples have included a Jain Tirthankara within its premises in a place of honour.[390][391] Similarly numerous temple complexes feature both Hindu and Jain monuments, with Badami cave temples and Khajuraho among some of the most well known.[392][393]

Jainism faced persecution during and after the Muslim conquests on the Indian subcontinent.[394] Muslims rulers, such as Mahmud Ghazni (1001), Mohammad Ghori (1175) and Ala-ud-din Muhammed Shah Khalji (1298) further oppressed the Jain community.[395] They vandalised idols and destroyed temples or converted them into mosques. They also burned Jain books and killed Jains. There were significant exceptions, such as Emperor Akbar (15421605) whose legendary religious tolerance, out of respect for Jains, ordered the release of caged birds and banned the killing of animals on the Jain festival of Paryusan.[396] After Akbar, Jains faced an intense period of Muslim persecution in the 17th century.[397][398]

The Jain community were the traditional bankers and financiers, and this significantly impacted the Muslim rulers. However, they rarely were a part of the political power during the Islamic rule period of the Indian subcontinent.[399]

Colonial era

Colonial era reports and Christian missions variously viewed Jainism as either a sect of Hinduism[400] or Buddhism, or as a distinct religion.[401][402] According to Padmanabh Jaini, Christian missionaries expressed extreme frustration at Jain people without pagan creator gods refusing to convert to Christianity, while colonial era Jain scholars such as Champat Rai Jain defended Jainism against criticism and misrepresentation by Christian activists.[403] Missionaries of Christianity and Islam considered Jain traditions as idolatrous and a false religion,[404] characterizing Jain temples and icons, such of those of Jina, as false idols and superstitious practices. These criticisms, states John Cort, were flawed and also ignored similar practices within sects of Christianity.[405]

The British colonial government in India, as well as Indian princely states, passed laws that made monks roaming naked in streets a crime, one that led to arrest. This law particularly impacted the Digambara monks.[406] The Akhil Bharatiya Jain Samaj opposed this law, and argued that it interfered with the religious rights of Jains. Acharya Shantisagar entered Bombay (now Mumbai) in 1927, but was forced to cover his body. He then led an India-wide tour as the naked monk with his followers, to various Digambara sacred sites, and was welcomed by kings of the Maharashtra provinces.[406] Shantisagar fasted to oppose the restrictions imposed on Digambara monks by the British Raj and prompted their discontinuance.[407] The colonial era laws that banned naked monks remained effective through World War II, but they were abolished by India after it gained independence.[408]

Jains in the modern era

Ancient temple of Pakbirra, Purulia

Followers of Jainism are called "Jains", a word derived from the Sanskrit word jina (victor) referring to the path of victory in crossing over life's stream of rebirths by destroying karma through an ethical and spiritual life.[409][410][199] The majority of Jains currently reside in India. With four to five million followers worldwide,[411][412] Jainism is relatively small compared to major world religions. Jains form 0.37% of India's population. Most of them are concentrated in the states of Maharashtra (1.4 million in 2011,[413] 31.46% of Indian Jains), Rajasthan (13.97%), Gujarat (13.02%) and Madhya Pradesh (12.74%). Karnataka (9.89%), Uttar Pradesh (4.79%), Delhi (3.73%) and Tamil Nadu (2.01%) also have significant Jain populations.[413] Outside India, Jain communities can be found in Europe, the United States, Canada,[414] Australia and Kenya.[415] Jainism is also spreading rapidly in Japan, where there are more than 5,000 families who have converted to Jainism.[416]

According to the National Family and Health Survey (NFHS-4) conducted in 2015–16, Jains form the wealthiest community in India.[417] Jains have the highest literacy rate (87%) in India, in the 7-years to oldest age group, according to its 2011 census. The Jain community also has the highest number of college graduates.[418] Excluding the retired senior citizens, Jain literacy rate in India exceeded 97%. The female to male child sex ratio in the 0–6 year age was second lowest for Jains (870 girls per 1,000 boys), higher than Sikhs in India. Further, Jain males have the highest work participation rates, while Jain females have the lowest work participation rates in India.[419]

Major Jain communities:

Jain Temple complex, Deogarh
  • Jain Bunt are a Jain community from Karnataka, India.[420]
  • Jain Komati is a small community scattered all over South and Central India and patrons of many Jain Institutions.[421][422]
  • Saraks is a community in Jharkhand, Bihar, Bengal, and Orissa. They have been followers of Jainism since ancient time.[423]
  • Porwal community that originated in southern Rajasthan, India.[424]
  • Parwar is a major Jain community from the Bundelkhand region, which is largely in Madhya Pradesh and Lalitpur District, Jhansi.[425]
  • Agrawal Jain of Hisar, Haryana.[426]
  • Bhabra of Punjab is an ancient merchant community from Punjab region which mainly follows Jainism.
  • Sarawagi or Khandelwali originated from Khandela, a historical town in northern Rajasthan.[425]
  • Bagherwal from Baghera (currently known as Ajmer district) a princely state in Rajasthan, a community of Digambar sect.
  • Shrimal, originally from Rajasthan, Shrimal town in southern Rajasthan. The Shrimal (Srimal) Jain are part of the Oswal merchant and minister caste that is found primarily in the north of India.[427]
  • Oswal are a Jain community with origins in the Marwar region of Rajasthan and Tharparkar district in Sindh.[428]
  • Jaiswal are mainly located in the Gwalior and Agra region.[429]
  • Navnat emerged as a result of blending of several smaller Jain communities in East Africa as well as in Gujarat itself in early 20th century.[430]

Jainism has been praised for some of its practices and beliefs. Mahatma Gandhi, who was greatly influenced by Jainism, said:[431]

No religion in the World has explained the principle of Ahiṃsā so deeply and systematically as is discussed with its applicability in every human life in Jainism. As and when the benevolent principle of Ahiṃsā or non-violence will be ascribed for practice by the people of the world to achieve their end of life in this world and beyond, Jainism is sure to have the uppermost status and Mahāvīra is sure to be respected as the greatest authority on Ahiṃsā.[432]

See also

  • Criticism of Jainism
  • Jain law
  • Jain cosmology
  • List of Jains
  • Nonviolence
  • History of Jainism

Notes

  1. This view, however, is not shared by all Jain sub-traditions. For example, the Terapanthi Jain tradition, with about 250,000 followers, considers both good karma such as compassionate charity, and bad karma such as sin, as binding one's soul to worldly morality. It states that any karma leads to a negation of the "absolute non-violence" principle, given man's limited perspective. It recommends that the monk or nun seeking salvation must avoid hurting or helping any being in any form.[6]
  2. Jain literature, like Buddhist and Hindu literature, has also debated the aspects of violence and non-violence in food creation.[18]
  3. In Jainism, the ahiṃsā precept for a mendicant requires avoidance of touching or disturbing any living being including plants. It also mandates never swimming in water, nor lighting or fire or extinguish one, nor thrashing arms in the air as such actions can torment or hurt other beings that live in those states of matter.[13]
  4. The first is desavakasika (staying in a restrained surrounding, cutting down worldly activities). The third is posadhopavasa (fasting on the 8th and 14th days on lunar waxing and waning cycles). The fourth is dana (giving alms to Jain monks, nuns or spiritual people).[88]
  5. According to Dundas, samayika seems to have meant "correct behavior" in early Jainism.[93]
  6. The ontological categories and definition of dharma as motion, and adharma as rest, is unique to Jainism among Indian religions.[157] However, like other Indian religions, dharma also means "moral virtue" in Jainism, while adharma also means "immorality, unethical behavior".[156]
  7. Not to be confused with the four Vedas of Hinduism.[237]
  8. According to Richard Gombrich and other scholars, Buddhism too was not a rejection or rebellion against any ancient caste system and it too was focused on individual's liberation from rebirths and suffering. The caste system in Buddhist societies and monasteries outside India have been documented. Gombrich states, "Some modernists go so far as to say that the Buddha was against caste altogether: this is not the case, but is one of the mistakes picked up from western authors."[279][275][280]
  9. Some texts refer to the place as Mount Sammeta.[304]
  1. Whether the begging utensils of a monk, such as robe and begging bowl, were justified and legitimate for a Jain monk and were not considered an impediment on the path to salvation, remained a bone of contention among various splinter groups within Jainism, and was partly responsible for the ultimate Digambara-Svetambara split, although it would be a grave oversimplification to reduce the roots of the split to just monks' robes and bowls.[75]
  2. Jainism is an ancient Indian religion and from ancient times to the present day, it has continued to flourish, along with other religions, in different parts of India.[339]

References

Citations

  1. ""Jainism" (ODE)", Oxford Dictionaries
  2. Dundas 2002, p. 160.
  3. Markham & Lohr 2009, p. 71.
  4. Price 2010, p. 90.
  5. Dundas 2002, pp. 160–162.
  6. Flügel 2002, pp. 1266–1267.
  7. John Arapura in K. R. Sundararajan and Bithika Mukerji Ed. (1997), Hindu spirituality: Postclassical and modern, ISBN 978-81-208-1937-5; Chapter 20, pp. 392–417
  8. A Izawa (2008), Empathy for Pain in Vedic Ritual, Journal of the International College for Advanced Buddhist Studies, Kokusai Bukkyōgaku Daigakuin Daigaku, Vol. 12, pp. 78–81
  9. Sethia 2004, p. 2.
  10. Dundas 2002, pp. 176–177.
  11. Winternitz 1993, pp. 408–409.
  12. Dundas 2002, pp. 88–89, 257–258.
  13. Taylor 2008, pp. 892–894.
  14. Phyllis Granoff (1992). "The violence of non-violence: a study of some Jain responses to non-Jain religious practices". The Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies. 15 (1). Archived from the original on 23 April 2017. Retrieved 2 May 2017.
  15. Dundas 2002, pp. 162–163.
  16. Lorenzen 1978, pp. 61–75.
  17. Dundas 2002, p. 163.
  18. Olson 2014, pp. 1–7.
  19. Charitrapragya 2004, pp. 75–79.
  20. Dundas 2002, pp. 229–231.
  21. Grimes, John (1996) p. 34; Philip C. Almond (1982). Mystical Experience and Religious Doctrine: An Investigation of the Study of Mysticism in World Religions. Walter de Gruyter. p. 75. ISBN 978-90-279-3160-3.
  22. Jain philosophy Archived 21 February 2015 at the Wayback Machine, IEP, Mark Owen Webb, Texas Tech University
  23. Schwartz, Wm. Andrew (2018). The Metaphysics of Paradox: Jainism, Absolute Relativity, and Religious Pluralism. Lexington Books. ISBN 978-1-4985-6392-5. Archived from the original on 24 August 2018. Retrieved 23 August 2018.
  24. Matilal 1990, pp. 301–305.
  25. Balcerowicz 2015, pp. 205–218.
  26. Matilal 1998, pp. 128–135.
  27. Koller 2000, pp. 400–407.
  28. Sangave 2006, p. 48–51.
  29. Dundas 2002, pp. 90–99, 104–105, 229–233.
  30. Dundas 2002, pp. 232–234.
  31. Sethia 2004, pp. 86–91.
  32. Long 2009, pp. 98–106.
  33. Dundas 2002, p. 233.
  34. Natubhai Shah 2004, p. 112.
  35. Dundas 2002, pp. 117, 152.
  36. Natubhai Shah 2004, pp. 112–113.
  37. von Glasenapp 1925, pp. 228–231.
  38. von Glasenapp 1925, p. 228.
  39. Shah, Pravin K (2011), Five Great Vows (Maha-vratas) of Jainism, Harvard University Literature Center, archived from the original on 31 December 2014, retrieved 7 May 2017
  40. Vijay K. Jain 2012, p. 33.
  41. Vijay K. Jain 2012, p. 68.
  42. von Glasenapp 1925, p. 231.
  43. Long 2009, p. 109.
  44. Vijay K. Jain 2012, p. 87–88.
  45. Tukol 1976, p. 5.
  46. Dundas 2002, pp. 179–180.
  47. Jaini 2000, p. 16.
  48. Tukol 1976, p. 7.
  49. Williams 1991, pp. 166–167.
  50. Cort 2001a, pp. 118–122.
  51. Caillat 2003b, p. 113.
  52. Flügel 2003, pp. 169–174, 178–198 with footnotes.
  53. Fujinaga 2003, pp. 205–212 with footnotes.
  54. Balcerowicz 2015, pp. 144–150.
  55. Cort 2001a, pp. 120–21.
  56. Cort 2001a, pp. 120–122.
  57. Flügel 2003, p. 182 with footnote 3.
  58. Johnson 1995, pp. 196–197.
  59. Cort 2001a, pp. 121–122.
  60. Shanti Lal Jain 1998, p. 51.
  61. Balcerowicz 2015, pp. 15–18, 41–43.
  62. Cort 2001a, pp. 48–49.
  63. Balcerowicz 2009, p. 17.
  64. Natubhai Shah 2004, pp. 2–3.
  65. John E. Cort "A Tale of Two Cities: On the Origins of Digambara Sectarianism in North India." L. A. Babb, V. Joshi, and M. W. Meister (eds.), Multiple Histories: Culture and Society in the Study of Rajasthan, 39–83. Jaipur: Rawat, 2002.
  66. Cort 2001a, pp. 48–59.
  67. Cort 2001a, p. 47.
  68. Flügel 2006, pp. 314–331, 353–361.
  69. Long 2013, pp. 36–37.
  70. Harvey 2016, pp. 182–183.
  71. Dundas 2002, pp. 55–59.
  72. Johnston 2000, pp. 681–683.
  73. Caillat 2003a, pp. 30–34 with footnote 28.
  74. Hirakawa 1993, pp. 4–7.
  75. Balcerowicz 2015, pp. 42–43.
  76. Vijay K. Jain 2013, p. 197.
  77. Dundas 2002, p. 152, 163–164.
  78. Jaini 1998, p. 190.
  79. Voorst 2015, p. 105.
  80. Sangave 1980, p. 260.
  81. Wiley 2009, p. 85.
  82. Wiley 2009, pp. 85–86.
  83. Ram Bhushan Prasad Singh 2008, pp. 92–94.
  84. Wiley 2009, p. 72.
  85. Wiley 2009, pp. 72, 85–86.
  86. Wiley 2009, p. 86.
  87. Dundas 2002, pp. 166–169.
  88. Jaini 1998, pp. 180–181.
  89. Jaini 1998, pp. 180–182.
  90. S.A. Jain 1992, p. 261.
  91. Natubhai Shah 2004, pp. 128–131.
  92. Johnson 1995, pp. 189–190.
  93. Dundas 2002, p. 170.
  94. Dundas 2002, pp. 187–189.
  95. Jaini 1998, pp. 162–165, 295–296.
  96. Jaini 1998, pp. 291–299.
  97. Wiley 2009, pp. 186–187.
  98. Jaini 1998, pp. 295–299.
  99. Dundas 2002, p. 40.
  100. Cort 2010, pp. 182–184.
  101. Jaini 1998, pp. 196, 343, 347.
  102. Jaini 1998, pp. 196–199.
  103. Wiley 2009, pp. 45–46, 215.
  104. Lindsay Jones 2005, p. 4771.
  105. Wiley 2009, pp. 33, 59, 92, 138, 191.
  106. Cort 1987, pp. 235–255.
  107. Mishra & Ray 2016, pp. 141–148.
  108. Dalal 2010a, p. 365.
  109. Jaini 1998, pp. 199–200.
  110. Pratapaditya Pal 1986, p. 29.
  111. Dundas 2002, pp. 204–205.
  112. Salvadori 1989, pp. 169–170.
  113. Babb 1996, pp. 32–33.
  114. Dundas 2002, pp. 81–82.
  115. Nayanar (2005b), p. 35 Gāthā 1.29
  116. Voorst 2015, p. 107.
  117. Ellen Gough (2012), Shades of Enlightenment: A Jain Tantric Diagram and the Colours of the Tirthankaras, International Journal of Jaina Studies, Volume 8, Number 1, pp. 1–47; Summary Archive: Studying Jainism and its Tantric Ritual Diagrams in India, Ellen Gough Archived 30 January 2017 at the Wayback Machine
  118. Cort 2001b, pp. 417–419.
  119. Dalal 2010a, pp. 164, 284.
  120. Melton 2011, p. 673.
  121. Dalal 2010a, p. 284.
  122. Cort 1995, p. 160.
  123. Dalal 2010a, p. 220.
  124. Natubhai Shah 2004, p. 211.
  125. Pechilis & Raj 2013, p. 86.
  126. Pechilis & Raj 2013, p. 85.
  127. Dalal 2010a, p. 164.
  128. Dundas 2002, p. 45.
  129. Clarke & Beyer 2009, p. 326.
  130. Dundas 2002, p. 47.
  131. von Glasenapp 1925, p. 46.
  132. Price 2010, pp. 104–105.
  133. Fohr 2015, pp. 21–22.
  134. Jaini 1991, p. 3.
  135. Jones & Ryan 2006, p. 211.
  136. Umakant P. Shah 1987, p. 5.
  137. Dundas 2002, pp. 31–33.
  138. Jaini 2000, pp. 27–28.
  139. Kailash Chand Jain 1991, p. 12.
  140. Natubhai Shah 2004, pp. 73–74.
  141. Dundas 2002, p. 21.
  142. Umakant P. Shah 1987, p. 17.
  143. Umakant P. Shah 1987, pp. 79–80.
  144. Dalal 2010a, p. 167.
  145. Jaini 2000, p. 167.
  146. Dalal 2010a, p. 341.
  147. Sthanakavasi Archived 22 August 2017 at the Wayback Machine, "Jain Sect", Encyclopaedia Britannica
  148. Cort 2001a, pp. 41, 60.
  149. Dundas 2002, pp. 155–157, 249–250, 254–259.
  150. Dundas 2002, p. 249.
  151. Flügel 2005, pp. 194–243.
  152. Vallely 2002, p. 15.
  153. Dundas 2002, p. 56.
  154. Dundas 2002, pp. 93–94.
  155. Jaini 1998, pp. 81–89.
  156. "Dravya – Jainism", Encyclopædia Britannica, archived from the original on 1 April 2016, retrieved 12 May 2016
  157. Dundas 2002, p. 95.
  158. Doniger 1999, p. 551.
  159. Long 2013, pp. 83–85.
  160. Jaini 1998, pp. 97–101.
  161. Long 2013, pp. 122–125.
  162. Dundas 2002, pp. 94–95.
  163. Champat Rai Jain 1929b, pp. 15–16.
  164. Jaini 1998, p. 97–106.
  165. Wiley 2009, p. 91.
  166. Dundas 2002, pp. 93–96.
  167. Dundas 2002, pp. 96–98.
  168. Soni 1991, pp. 75–88.
  169. Dundas 2002, pp. 95–96.
  170. von Glasenapp 1925, pp. 177–187.
  171. Jaini 1998, p. 151.
  172. von Glasenapp 1925, pp. 188–190.
  173. Jaini 1980, pp. 219–228.
  174. Bailey 2012, p. 108.
  175. Long 2013, pp. 18, 98–100.
  176. Jaini 1998, p. 103.
  177. Jaini 1998, pp. 104–106.
  178. von Glasenapp 1925, p. 194.
  179. Long 2013, pp. 92–95.
  180. Dundas 2002, pp. 99–103.
  181. Jaini 1998, p. 107.
  182. Jaini 1998, pp. 107–115.
  183. Jaini 1998, pp. 117–118.
  184. Jaini 1980, p. 226.
  185. Jaini 1980, p. 228.
  186. Jaini 2000, pp. 130–131.
  187. Jaini 1980, pp. 223–224.
  188. Jaini 1980, pp. 224–225.
  189. Sethia 2004, pp. 30–31.
  190. Jaini 1980, p. 227.
  191. Jaini 1980, pp. 227–228.
  192. Dundas 2002, pp. 104–105.
  193. Jaini 1980, p. 225.
  194. Jaini 1980, pp. 222–223.
  195. Dundas 2002, pp. 90–92.
  196. von Glasenapp 1925, p. 241.
  197. Natubhai Shah 1998, p. 25.
  198. Vijay K. Jain 2011, p. 46.
  199. Upinder Singh 2016, p. 313.
  200. von Glasenapp 1925, pp. 271–272.
  201. Dundas 2002, p. 13.
  202. Champat Rai Jain 1929b, p. 124.
  203. Dalal 2010a, p. 27.
  204. Zimmer 1953, p. 182.
  205. von Glasenapp 1925, pp. 241–242.
  206. von Glasenapp 1925, pp. 241–243.
  207. von Glasenapp 1925, pp. 247–249, 262–263.
  208. Dundas 2002, pp. 20–21, 34–35, 74, 91, 95–96, 103.
  209. von Glasenapp 1925, pp. 262–263.
  210. Dundas 2002, pp. 91, 95–96.
  211. Rankin & Mardia 2013, p. 40.
  212. John A. Grimes, A Concise Dictionary of Indian Philosophy: Sanskrit Terms Defined in English, State University of New York Press, ISBN 978-0-7914-3067-5, p. 238
  213. Jayandra Soni (2000), Basic Jaina Epistemology, Philosophy East and West, University of Hawai'i Press, Vol. 50, No. 3, pp. 367–377
  214. Dundas 2002, pp. 75–76, 131, 229–230.
  215. Dundas 2002, pp. 229–230.
  216. S.A. Jain 1992, p. 16.
  217. Vijay K. Jain 2011, p. 6.
  218. Cort 2001a, pp. 6–7.
  219. Fohr 2015, pp. 9–10, 37.
  220. Jaini 1998, pp. 141–147.
  221. Jaini 1998, pp. 148, 200.
  222. Cort 2001a, p. 7.
  223. S.A. Jain 1992, p. 282–283.
  224. SuryaprajnaptiSūtra Archived 15 June 2017 at the Wayback Machine, The Schoyen Collection, London/Oslo
  225. Dundas 2002, pp. 60–61.
  226. von Glasenapp 1925, pp. 109–110.
  227. Champat Rai Jain 1929b, p. 135.
  228. Champat Rai Jain 1929b, p. 136.
  229. Dundas 2002, p. 61.
  230. von Glasenapp 1925, pp. 110–111.
  231. von Glasenapp 1925, pp. 121–122.
  232. von Glasenapp 1925, pp. 112–113.
  233. Vijay K. Jain 2016, p. xii.
  234. Jaini 1998, p. 78–81.
  235. von Glasenapp 1925, p. 124.
  236. von Glasenapp 1925, pp. 123–124.
  237. Dalal 2010a, pp. 164–165.
  238. von Glasenapp 1925, pp. 125–126.
  239. Jones & Ryan 2007, pp. 439–440.
  240. Umāsvāti 1994, p. xi–xiii, Quote: "That Which Is, known as the Tattvartha Sūtra to Jains, is recognized by all four Jain traditions as the earliest, most authoritative and comprehensive summary of their religion.".
  241. Dundas 2006, pp. 395–396.
  242. Finegan 1989, p. 221.
  243. Balcerowicz 2003, pp. 25–34.
  244. Chatterjee 2000, p. 282–283.
  245. Jaini 1991, p. 32–33.
  246. Cush, Robinson & York 2012, pp. 515, 839.
  247. Zvelebil 1992, pp. 13–16.
  248. Cort 1998, p. 163.
  249. Dundas 2002, p. 116–117.
  250. Zvelebil 1992, pp. 37–38.
  251. Spuler 1952, pp. 24–25, context: 22–27.
  252. Cort 1998, p. 164.
  253. Dundas 2002, pp. 118–120.
  254. Dundas 2002, p. 83.
  255. Guy, John (January 2012), "Jain Manuscript Painting", The Metropolitan Museum of Art, Heilburnn Timeline of Art History, archived from the original on 2 April 2013, retrieved 25 April 2013
  256. Dundas 2002, pp. 83–84.
  257. Solomon & Higgins 1998, pp. 11–22.
  258. Appleton 2016, pp. 1–21, 25–27, 57–58, 82–84.
  259. McFaul 2006, pp. 27–28.
  260. Shaw & Demy 2017, p. 635.
  261. Solomon & Higgins 1998, pp. 18–22.
  262. McFaul 2006, pp. 27–40.
  263. Dundas 2002, pp. 87–88.
  264. Wiley 2004, pp. 2–5.
  265. Hiriyanna 1993, pp. 157–158, 168–169.
  266. Hiriyanna 1993, pp. 54–62, 77–82, 132.
  267. Perrett 2013, pp. 247–248.
  268. Bartley 2013, pp. 1–10, 76–79, 87–98.
  269. Jaini 1998, pp. 58, 102–105.
  270. Dalal 2010b, pp. 174–175.
  271. Juergensmeyer 2011, p. 54.
  272. Kelting 2009, pp. 206 note 4.
  273. Nesfield 1885, pp. 116–117.
  274. Pope 1880, pp. 40–41.
  275. Alberts 2007, pp. 258–259.
  276. Dundas 2002, pp. 147–149, 304 footnote 24.
  277. Babb 1996, pp. 137–145, 54, 172.
  278. Sangave 1980, pp. 73, 316–317.
  279. Gombrich 2012, pp. 344–353 with footnotes.
  280. Florida 2005, pp. 134–137.
  281. Jaini 1998, pp. 288–289, 78.
  282. Nisithabhasya (in Nisithasutra) 289; Jinadatta Suri: Upadesharasayana 26; Dundas pp. 162–163; Tähtinen p. 31.
  283. Jindal pp. 89–90; Laidlaw pp. 154–155; Jaini, Padmanabh S.: Ahimsa and "Just War" in Jainism, in: Ahimsa, Anekanta and Jainism, ed. Tara Sethia, New Delhi 2004, p. 52–60; Tähtinen p. 31.
  284. Harisena, Brhatkathakosa 124 (10th century); Jindal pp. 90–91; Sangave p. 259.
  285. Udaygiri and Khandagiri Caves Archived 29 October 2015 at the Wayback Machine, Archaeological Survey of India, Government of India
  286. Natubhai Shah 1998, p. 184.
  287. Umakant P. Shah 1987, p. 95.
  288. Kishore, Kanika (16 June 2015). "Symbol and Image Worship in Jainism". Indian Historical Review. 42 (1): 17–43. doi:10.1177/0376983615569814.
  289. "Ayagapata". Encyclopædia Britannica. Archived from the original on 27 November 2011. Retrieved 18 April 2012.
  290. Jain & Fischer 1978, pp. 9–10
  291. Wiley 2009, p. 184.
  292. Owen 2012a, pp. 1–2.
  293. Natubhai Shah 1998, p. 183.
  294. Natubhai Shah 1998, p. 113.
  295. Jain & Fischer 1978, p. 16.
  296. Natubhai Shah 1998, p. 187.
  297. "Basadi", kamat.com, archived from the original on 4 March 2016, retrieved 15 December 2016
  298. Singhvi & Chopra 2002.
  299. S. S. Kavitha (31 October 2012), "Namma Madurai: History hidden inside a cave", The Hindu, archived from the original on 3 January 2014, retrieved 15 November 2013
  300. Barik, Bibhuti (22 June 2015), "Plan to beautify Khandagiri – Monument revamp to attract more tourists", The Telegraph, Bhubaneswar, archived from the original on 23 February 2016, retrieved 16 February 2016
  301. Sehdev Kumar 2001.
  302. Trivedi, Tanvi (17 September 2012), "The architectural beauty of Ranakpur", The Times of India, archived from the original on 17 November 2016, retrieved 5 April 2017
  303. Cort 2010, pp. 130–133.
  304. Jacobi 1964, p. 275.
  305. Peter 2010, p. 352.
  306. "Murtipujakas, Jainism", Encyclopedia of World Religions (PHILTAR), University of Cambria, archived from the original on 13 October 2007
  307. Khajuraho Group of Monuments, UNESCO, archived from the original on 18 February 2017, retrieved 14 March 2017
  308. Group of Monuments at Pattadakal, UNESCO, archived from the original on 26 March 2014, retrieved 14 March 2017
  309. Butalia & Small 2004, p. 367.
  310. Bright 2010, p. 465.
  311. Fergusson 1876, p. 271.
  312. Pandya 2014, p. 17.
  313. "Source", proel.org, archived from the original on 1 December 2018, retrieved 13 January 2019
  314. Upinder Singh 2016, p. 460.
  315. Owen 2012a, p. 50.
  316. S. S. Kavitha (3 February 2010), "Preserving the past", The Hindu, archived from the original on 3 January 2014, retrieved 15 November 2013
  317. "Arittapatti inscription throws light on Jainism", The Hindu, 15 September 2003, archived from the original on 23 November 2013, retrieved 15 November 2013
  318. Titze 1998.
  319. Nagarparkar Cultural Landscape Archived 10 May 2017 at the Wayback Machine, Tantative List, UNESCO World Heritage Centre
  320. Arora, p. 405.
  321. Cort 2010.
  322. "And India's 7 wonders are", The Times of India, 5 August 2007, archived from the original on 18 October 2012, retrieved 3 January 2013
  323. Botekar, Abhilash (4 December 2015), "70-crore plan for idol installation at Mangi-Tungi", The Times of India, Nashik, TNN, archived from the original on 19 January 2016, retrieved 7 February 2016
  324. Pratapaditya Pal 1986, p. 22.
  325. Met Museum, archived from the original on 6 May 2017, retrieved 16 April 2017
  326. Jain & Fischer 1978, pp. 9–10.
  327. Cort 2001a, p. 17.
  328. Jansma & Jain 2006, p. 123.
  329. Cort 2001a, pp. 17–18.
  330. "Om – significance in Jainism, Languages and Scripts of India, Colorado State University", cs.colostate.edu
  331. von Glasenapp 1925, pp. 410–411.
  332. Agarwal 2012, p. 135.
  333. Agarwal 2013, p. 80.
  334. Robinson 2006, p. 225.
  335. Sangave 2001, p. 123.
  336. Vallely 2013, p. 358.
  337. Vijay K. Jain 2012, p. iv.
  338. Titze 1998, p. 234.
  339. Sangave 2001, p. 185.
  340. Rankin & Mardia 2013, p. 975.
  341. von Glasenapp 1925, p. 13.
  342. von Glasenapp 1925, p. 16.
  343. Long 2013, pp. 53–54.
  344. Lochtefeld 2002, p. 639.
  345. Billimoria 1988, pp. 1–30.
  346. Jambuvijaya 2002, p. 114.
  347. Pande 1957, p. 353.
  348. Arishtanemi: Jaina Saint Archived 12 August 2017 at the Wayback Machine, Encyclopaedia Britannica
  349. Long 2009, p. 42.
  350. Dundas 2002, pp. 236–237.
  351. Hinnells 1991, pp. 145–146.
  352. Dundas 2002, pp. 113–115, 222–223, 236–237.
  353. Rishabhanatha, in Encyclopaedia Britannica, Editors of the Encyclopaedia Britannica, 2010, archived from the original on 19 May 2017, retrieved 9 May 2017
  354. Sangave 2001, pp. 104, 129.
  355. Saraswati 1908, p. 444.
  356. Zimmer 1953, p. 183.
  357. Jaini 1998, p. 10.
  358. Dundas, Paul (2013), Jainism, Encyclopædia Britannica, archived from the original on 17 September 2013, retrieved 17 September 2013
  359. Barnett 1957, p. 7.
  360. Dundas 2003a, p. 383.
  361. Keown & Prebish 2013, pp. 127–130.
  362. Sangave 2001, p. 105.
  363. Neelis 2010, pp. 72–76.
  364. Dundas 2003b, pp. ix–xi, 151–162.
  365. von Glasenapp 1925, p. 41.
  366. Chandragupta Maurya, Emperor of India Archived 8 August 2017 at the Wayback Machine, Encyclopaedia Britannica
  367. Kulke & Rothermund 2004, pp. 63–65.
  368. Boesche 2003, pp. 7–18.
  369. Mookerji 1988, pp. 39–46, 234–236.
  370. Mookerji 1988, pp. 4–21, 232–237.
  371. von Glasenapp 1925, p. 42.
  372. von Glasenapp 1925, p. 43.
  373. Upinder Singh 2016, p. 444.
  374. von Glasenapp 1925, p. 49.
  375. Cort 2010, p. 202.
  376. Natubhai Shah 2004, pp. 69–70.
  377. von Glasenapp 1925, p. 51.
  378. Pereira 1977, pp. 21–24.
  379. von Glasenapp 1925, p. 52.
  380. Lochtefeld 2002, p. 409.
  381. Arunachalam 1981, p. 170.
  382. World Heritage Sites – Ellora Caves Archived 7 October 2015 at the Wayback Machine, Archeological Survey of India (2011), Government of India
  383. Gopal 1990, p. 178.
  384. Owen 2012b, pp. 1–10.
  385. von Glasenapp 1925, pp. 52–54.
  386. von Glasenapp 1925, p. 56.
  387. von Glasenapp 1925, pp. 75–77.
  388. Das 2005, p. 161.
  389. Centre, UNESCO World Heritage. "Nagarparkar Cultural Landscape – UNESCO World Heritage Centre". whc.unesco.org. Archived from the original on 10 May 2017. Retrieved 14 April 2017.
  390. Long 2009, pp. 5–6.
  391. Sharma & Ghosal 2006, pp. 100–103.
  392. Michell 2014, p. 38–52, 60–61.
  393. Trudy King et al., Asia and Oceania: International Dictionary of Historic Places, Routledge, ISBN 978-1-884964-04-6, pp. 468–470
  394. Dundas 2002, pp. 145–146, 124.
  395. von Glasenapp 1925, pp. 74–75.
  396. Dundas 2002, p. 146.
  397. Dundas 2002, pp. 220–221.
  398. Truschke 2015, pp. 1311–1344.
  399. Cort 1998, pp. 85–86.
  400. British India (1867). Various Census of India: 1871–1872. Government of India. pp. 31 note 140.
  401. Hopkins 1902, p. 283.
  402. Sunavala 1934, pp. 91–93.
  403. Jaini 2000, p. 33.
  404. Hackett 2008, pp. 63–68.
  405. Cort 2010, pp. 12–16, 200–207, 218–219, 251 with note 10.
  406. Flügel 2006, pp. 348–349.
  407. Natubhai Shah 2004, p. 56.
  408. Flügel 2006, pp. 359–360.
  409. Tirthankara: Jainism, Encyclopedia Britannica
  410. Sangave 2006, p. 15.
  411. Voorst 2014, p. 96.
  412. Melton & Baumann 2010, p. lix, 1395.
  413. Office of registrar general and census commissioner (2011), C-1 Population By Religious Community, Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India, archived from the original on 13 September 2015, retrieved 9 September 2015
  414. Wiley 2009, p. 43.
  415. Mugambi 2010, p. 108.
  416. "Thousands of Japanese making a smooth transition from Zen to Jain". Hindustan Times. 23 February 2020.
  417. "Delhi and Punjab richest states, Jain wealthiest community: National survey". Hindustan Times. 13 January 2018.
  418. Jains have highest percentage of literates: Census 2011, The Times of India, 31 August 2016, archived from the original on 29 January 2017, retrieved 19 May 2017
  419. Census India (2011), Distribution of Population by Religions (PDF), Government of India, archived (PDF) from the original on 4 March 2016, retrieved 19 May 2017
  420. Kumar Suresh Singh 2004, pp. 387–391(Emigrant Bunts by P. Dhar).
  421. "Jain Culture In Telugu Literature". jainsamaj.org. Archived from the original on 7 February 2016.
  422. "Inscription on the last Jain temple in Telangana found". thehindu.com.
  423. "Government of West Bengal: List of Other Backward Classes". Govt. of West Bengal. Archived from the original on 19 January 2016. Retrieved 23 December 2011.
  424. K. S. Singh 2004, p. 1738.
  425. Kumar Suresh Singh 2004, p. 565.
  426. Patel, Aakar (6 February 2015). "A history of the Agarwals". Livemint. Retrieved 9 January 2020.
  427. K. S. Singh 1989, p. 524.
  428. Babb 2004, pp. 164–178.
  429. "About Jaiswals". Jaiswal Samaj. Archived from the original on 30 April 2018. Retrieved 12 January 2019.
  430. Adam 2015, p. 299.
  431. Rudolph & Rudolph 1984, p. 171.
  432. Janardan Pandey 1998, p. 50.

Sources

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.