Timeline of the 2019–20 Hong Kong protests (June 2020)

A petition in support of Beijing's plan to implement national security legislation was published online, which claimed to have been signed by over 2,500 actors, artists, and individuals from the entertainment and cultural industry in Hong Kong. The petition contained the name of veteran actor Ram Chiang, but Chiang later stated in his Facebook page that he did not sign the petition. It was reported that Barbie Hsu had also denied receiving an invitation or notification to join the petition.[1]

The petition also consisted of late artists such as Anita Mui and Leslie Cheung, with several netizens believing that the petition consisted of fake signatures.[2] Sharon Cheung, a news broadcaster, clarified that she never did sign the petition.[3]

A restaurant in Ngau Tau Kok, which was supportive of the protests and youngsters, received a letter from the Hong Kong Housing Authority that the contract was no longer renewed and the eatery would shut down on 30 November 2020, despite the restaurant fulfilling social responsibility by giving out free lunchboxes to the elderly. Employees of the restaurant criticized the authority's decision, calling it a suppression of the Yellow Economic Circle. After learning that the contract was to be terminated through information from the Internet, citizens queued up to support them.[4]

In a press interview in the Legislative Council, Financial Secretary Paul Chan Mo-po was seen with tears in his eyes, stirring controversy and discussion among social media on whether he was scared of the United States restrictions on Hong Kong. Chan later clarified in a Facebook post that the tears were due to the camera lighting during the interview, calling it a "misunderstanding".[5]

The annual Tiananmen Square massacre vigil in Hong Kong was banned for the first time since 1990 citing health concerns due to COVID-19. Lee Cheuk Yan, the chairman of the Hong Kong Alliance in Support of Patriotic Democratic Movements of China, which organized the vigil in the past years, said that the ban signaled the end of Hong Kong's "one country, two systems".[6]

A student, Lam Tsz-Ho, accused of rioting in Wong Tai Sin on the 1st of October was acquitted by judge Sham Siu-Man. The judge criticized the two police officers facilitating the accusations that they had not proven they had caught the person who had hurled a brick; and that the Court could not accept their affidavits. He went on to say that at least one of the two officers had failed to provide a full and truthful account of how Lam had sustained a head wound during his arrest.[7]

The protestor shot by a police officer in the November 11 shooting incident went on trial. The judge, Law Tak-Chuen, allowed the police officer who fired the shot to remain anonymous, stating that he had received death threats.[8] Andrew Li, former Chief Justice of the Court of Final Appeal of Hong Kong, stated that it was justifiable to implement Hong Kong Basic Law Article 23. In addition, Yang Ti-liang, former Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Hong Kong, issued a statement, expressing that the national security law was reasonable. He stated that every country had the right and authority to implement such laws. He also stressed the importance of judicial independence. Teresa Cheng, current Secretary for Justice, stated that those cases related to the National Security Law would be handled by her, and not by the central government.

Prior to embarking on a trip to Beijing to discuss matters on National People's Congress Decision on Hong Kong national security legislation, Chief Executive Carrie Lam told reporters, referencing the protests that had recently erupted in the United States in connection with the death of George Floyd, that the United States was applying "double standards" in its response to violence that had occurred during the Hong Kong protests.[9] Lam's entourage on her trip to mainland China included Teresa Cheng, Secretary for Justice, John Lee, Secretary for Security, Chris Tang, Commissioner of Police, and Eric Chan, Director of the Chief Executive's Office.

Prime Minister Boris Johnson announced that if China were to continue pursuing the national security law, he would allow all Hong Kong residents born before 1997 to claim a British National (Overseas) passport (BNO) and open a path to British citizenship for them. Raab said that the UK would sacrifice trade deals with China in order to support Hong Kong, but that presently it will remain in conversation with the international community on the matter.[10][11] A late-May statement by Raab had offered a similar measure that would allow the 300,000 current BNO passport holders to apply for a visa;[12] Johnson's 3 June announcement would cover the 3 million Hong Kong residents born before 1997.[10] China's foreign ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian threatened "serious consequences", while many Hong Kong pro-democratic politicians and protesters were reported to wish for more protection for their city itself.[10]

Burundi, Myanmar, North Korea, the Philippines, Sri Lanka, Syria, Tanzania, and Uganda announced their support for the National Security Law.[13]

Another case was that of Chiu Chun Yin, 22, who has been arrested on the charge of road blockage. In court, the prosecution suspected that he had pepper sprayed the police officer who had arrested him; yet no contents of pepper spray was found on the clothes of the police officer. A CCTV surveillance footage stated that the arrested had been beaten with a baton by the police officer. The police officer said that he was not using excessive force.

Some protesters and citizens gathered outside the Lai Chi Kok Reception Centre to mourn the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests, as well as to show solidarity with those who were detained for their actions in the current protests in Hong Kong.[14]

In reference to the George Floyd Protests in the United States, several Hong Kong artists and musicians posted messages of support towards the protests on social media. Pro-democracy artists and actors such as Chapman To and Gregory Wong criticized these artists, calling them "hypocrites" by standing in solidarity with the United States protests but turning a blind eye on police brutality in Hong Kong. To mocked the artists of having double standards as they feared that speaking out would harm their career in China.

In an article for the Bauhinia Magazine, Pro-China politician Tam Yiu-chung stated that those members of the legislative council who disapproved of the national security law should be disqualified. Members of the pro-democracy camp sharply criticized Tam's statements.[15]

Demosisto started a petition to fight for European state leaders to support Hong Kong citizens. There have been 70,000 signatures already out of the 100,000 goal.[16]

Human Rights First and University of Hong Kong Faculty of Law released a joint report on human rights. They stated that human rights lawyers stationed in Hong Kong might face arrest. The report was titled 'New Law, New Threat'. Daniel Wong Kwok-tung, a lawyer who has been helping and assisting protesters, told Apple Daily that protesters would sacrifice a lot, yet he would not give up, even if he faced potential arrest.

The annual Tiananmen Square massacre candlelight vigil was observed, even though the official gathering at Victoria Park was banned by police on 1 June, citing COVID-19 concerns. It had been the first time in 30 years that the vigil was banned.[17]

Multiple activities were planned to mourn the 1989 protests in different districts. 3500 police officers would standby at checkpoints.

The third reading of the National Anthem Bill was passed by the Legislative Council of Hong Kong. Andrew Leung shortened the discussion time to 30 hours, causing dissatisfaction among pro-democracy LegCo members. The bill would be further handled on 12th May, 2020. Andrew Leung was criticized by the pro-democracy party for breaching his powers. Pro-democracy protesters stood in silence during the legislative council meeting in memory of the Tiananmen Square Protests.

4 June 2020 was the 31st anniversary of the 1989 Tiananmen Square Protests. There were numerous activities in different areas and towns in Hong Kong, such as Victoria Park, Shatin, Tuen Mun, Tsuen Wan. At around 5:00 p.m., pro-democracy protesters handed out flyers outside Sogo in Causeway Bay, shouting slogans, and peacefully entering Victoria Park as groups of eight. The police used a broadcaster to warn citizens not to participate in unlawful assembly. Police stood on standby but did no action to prevent protesters inside the park grounds. Peaceful protesters lit candles, with many being first-time attendees of the annual June 4 vigil. The pro-Beijing camp accused Lee Cheuk-yan of encouraging unlawful assembly and unlawful behaviour. In addition, Star Avenue, Shing Mun River in Shatin, Tuen Mun Park, Sai Ying Pun Station,Kwun Tong Promenade and Langham Place all featured events. Attendees held umbrellas with slogans, and formed chains by holding hands together. At around 9:00 p.m., several people blocked roads near Langham Place in Mong Kok. The police stated that they were using traffic cones and fences to block multiple street roads. People were arrested by the police, who sprayed pepper spray. After the event, pro-China citizens urged the Hong Kong Police Force to arrest Lee Cheuk-yan and Jimmy Lai for participating in unlawful assembly, and that they disobeyed social distancing measures by participating in the vigil.

At the United States Department of State, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo met surviving activists of the 1989 Tiananmen Square Protests.[18] The State Department offered no details on what was discussed but said in a statement: "We mourn the victims of June 4, 1989, and we stand with the people of China who continue to aspire to a government that protects human rights, fundamental freedoms and basic human dignity."[19]

In accordance to the restrictions and sanctions placed on China and Hong Kong by the United States, Republican senator Pat Toomey urged the United States government to implement the sanctions as soon as possible. In a meeting, he stated that both Republicans and Democrats hoped to implement the restrictions quickly, so as to sanction those Chinese authorities and bank officials from spoiling Hong Kong's original autonomy. In a joint statement with Democrat Chris Van Hollen, he argued that those authorities responsible for implementing the National Security Law should have their assets frozen.[20]

Director of the Information and Press Department of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation Maria Zakharova stated that Russia treated the national security law as 'internal affairs' of China, and Britain and the United States should not interfere. In a press conference on 5 June, China Foreign Ministry spokesman Geng Shuang stated that China appreciated Russia's stance. He also expressed that this facilitated the friendly relationship between China and Russia, and that it was well-received within the international community.[21]

After HSBC backed the national security law proposed by Beijing[22] in a petition, Alistair Carmichael, chairman of the U.K. parliamentary group on Hong Kong, referred to the petition signed by the London-based bank's top executive in Asia, Peter Wong, in support of a move that critics say will diminish the city's freedom and autonomy. The British government is opposing the proposed law, with Prime Minister Boris Johnson saying he will give as many as three million residents of his nation's former colony the chance to seek refuge in the U.K. if China presses ahead. Member of Parliament Jacob Rees-Mogg criticized the bank of being pro-China instead of being pro-Britain, even though it was funded by the British. He publicly requested the bank to stop supporting the national security law. Former Governor of Hong Kong Chris Patten criticized China for exerting pressure on foreign companies through the threat of withholding business opportunities. He advised the United States to unite with other democratic countries to counter "underhanded tactics" by Beijing.[23][24]

A Hong Kong Institute of Vocational Education student accused of owning a petrol bomb was sentenced to one year in jail. Pro-democracy legislator Ted Hui accused a taxi driver of driving towards a crowd during a protest in a private prosecution. It was the first private prosecution case which was allowed by the Court since the start of the large-scale protests in June 2019. Hui had initiated the proceedings in February 2020 after the Department of Justice had taken no legal action. Hui stated that this case could uphold justice to the victims of the car crash.[25]

A case which had gained notable attention in Hong Kong has begun on May 11. Tong Wai-hung and To Yee-lan were arrested and charged of rioting in Sheung Wan on 28 July 2019 and had pleaded not guilty.[26] In court today they claimed that the police officer who has arrested them had not given them a police caution warning. When asked by the defense, she stated that she had forgiven all the formal procedures she had learnt in the Police Academy.[27]

The information technology, accounting, tourism and finance labour unions plan a strike to oppose the national security law. Professionals stated that they might face accusations of leakage of national security secrets once the law is implemented. They have already reached 140,000 signatures supporting the strike. 23 labour unions proposed a vote on 14th June, and if more than 60% of labourers and voters supported the vote, they would organise a major boycott in Hong Kong.Daniel Wong Kwok-tung, a pro-democracy lawyer in the protests, said that immigrants to Taiwan are in need of capital and a new identity. He expressed hope that Taiwan could provide assistance towards these issues. Lam Wing-kee, the manager of Causeway Bay Books who has been a victim of the Causeway Bay Books disappearances, stated that it was good news for Hong Kong citizens. He praised the Taiwanese government of taking action and thanked Tsai for her efforts to make Taiwan a free place.

Local activist group Demosisto urged the United Nations to discuss the National Security Law, and to advise the mainland government not to implement it. In a nine-page report, the group argued that the definition of 'National Security' was unclear and vague, and stressed that the law would allow those critical of the Chinese Communist Party to face potential arrest. They worried that slogans which have been familiar in the protests would be banned, and that there would be frequent abuse of power and rights from the top authorities. They also added that Hong Kong's freedom and autonomy would encounter a 'fatal' blow.

In an editorial published by Ta Kung Pao, a pro-China newspaper, pro-China commentator Wut Wing-yin voiced out support for the national security law. She stated that the Chinese Communist Party has granted Hong Kong 23 years of autonomy and freedom since the handover in 1997, yet the 'resistance' has retaliated with disobedience, rioting and damage. The national security law would be used to tackle those who intend to commit illegal crimes and participate in 'riots'. She advised general citizens of Hong Kong not to worry about its implications. She criticized the pro-democracy party of "instilling fear," generating negative attitudes and reviews towards the law.

Members of the Central and Western District Council has been accused of verbal threatening District Office authorities in the meeting after they failed to provide assistance. They were accused of 'shouting', which made the authorities extremely 'uncomfortable.' The government later condemned such behaviour and warned that that peaceful discussions had to be generated. The proposal to withdraw the national security law was introduced in the meeting. The members stated that the law was an attempt to restrict democracy and freedom in Hong Kong, which destroyed the 'One Country, Two Systems' concept. Some members of the district council also proposed a platform for the district council members to discuss social and political issues with citizens. There had also been a joint-meeting by 17 District Councils of Hong Kong to facilitate discussion of the national security law. The District Office stated that they abused the powers of the District Council to talk about non-district related affairs. The pro-China district council members called it an 'unlawful meeting', and declined to participate in the discussion. 80 pro-China politicians signed a petition in support of the national security law. Some pro-China citizens protested at the American Embassy of Hong Kong, waving flyers and accusing the United States of interfering with Chinese internal affairs. Luo Huining, Director of the Liaison Office of the Central People's Government in Hong Kong insisted that the law should be dealt strictly so as to 'protect the legal rights and freedom of the majority of Hong Kong citizens'.

Eight pro-China members of the Legislative Council would be drafted into the board of directors of The University of Hong Kong and The Chinese University of Hong Kong. Some of them are Horace Cheung, Regina Ip, Vincent Cheng, Tommy Cheung and Alice Mak.

Patrick Nip, Secretary for the Civil Service visited the Police Headquarters. Among the purposes of his visit was to meet those who had been injured in the protest movement over the past year.[28] Nip stated that the national security law was the crucial step for One Country, Two Systems to succeed. Later, in a press interview, he urged civil servants working for the government to support the national security law. He said, while dealing with national security issues, there should only be the concept of 'one country', and not 'two systems'. In addition, he expressed that the sense of identity was not strong among civil servants. He agreed that there should be enhanced communication with the Greater Bay Area and to develop programs to enhance the sense of identity among civil servants.

In a 1.5 hour phone call with Xi Jinping, President of France Emmanuel Macron expressed that he supported the 'One China, Two Systems' concept that China uses to govern Hong Kong.[29] He stated that he was closely following up the situation in Hong Kong. In addition, he also insisted the significance of the World Health Organization when dealing with COVID-19, contrary to the stance of the United States. The Government of France has stated before that France was alarmed that the national security law could lead to diminishing freedom in Hong Kong, and that Europe should not be caught in the middle of the hostility between the United States and China. Angela Merkel, Chancellor of Germany, had stated before her stance, and that she hoped to continue friendly relations with China. The European Union had stated before that 'sanctions were not the right approach to solve the problems in China'.

Other Development

Jeremy Tam, pro-democracy member of the Legislative Council, reported that he was followed by an unknown man speaking Cantonese with Chinese accents after leaving the Legislative Council in Wan Chai. They reportedly took pictures of him and followed him. When asked about his identity, the unknown man denied that he was a police officer. When Tam insisted on calling the police, the man suddenly ran towards the opposite direction. In a report presented by Tam, he stated that he was already followed since May. Tam expressed that 'Hong Kong has not been a totally safe place' after such incidents. He also claimed that if they were Chinese police, they could have abducted him on a car. Fellow pro-democracy Legislative Council member Alvin Yeung stated that society has been instilled with fear and terror. It has troubled politicians, social activists as well as commoners. Cheng Tat-hung, pro-democracy member of the Eastern District Council, called this incident 'totally unacceptable', stating that it should be condemned.

Lee Cheuk-yan, pro-democracy member of the Hong Kong Alliance in Support of Patriotic Democratic Movements in China, called for fundraising events for a virtual 'June 4TH Human Rights and Memory Museum' museum. They hoped to introduce the website in September 2021, and they hoped that they could raise 1.5 million HKD for the project. Lee stated that it could be part of a cultural conservation and a collective memory for Hong Kong citizens. He also stressed the urgency to start such a project as there was a proposed a national security law, and that the prospects of the association was pessimistic. The fund would be used for professional research and development, filing and classification, and technical and strategic development of the project. They would also collect files and information from the past 31 years after the Tiananmen Square Massacre, and they would form a special committee of consultants and experts to provide expertise and advice.

Pro-China activist Man Shek and 2 other pro-China activists went to the British Council to protest against Dominic Raab's policies towards Hong Kong. They presented a joint statement and held the Chinese flag. In addition, they ripped and destroyed their BNOs and criticized the British government of failing to consult Hong Kong citizens before introducing policies relating to the national security law.

Raymond Chan Chi-chuen, member of the Legislative Council was dragged on the floor and pulled by pro-China member of the Legislative Council Kwok Wai-keung for several seconds at a meeting at the Legislative Council where pro-democracy and pro-China politicians were arguing. Chan filed for a private prosecution to accuse Kwok of assault. The Court responded by saying that authorities have already handled out a prosecution ticket towards Kwok.

The number of robberies increased in the past year. Commissioner of Police Chris Tang blamed the protests for the increase in robberies. In a meeting, he criticized that the sense of not abiding with the law was severe, and that youngsters were brainwashed by such ideologies. He stated that this was the root cause of youngsters being more likely to be engaged in crime in the past year. The Hong Kong Police Force also criticized netizens of encouraging citizens to participate in unlawful assembly, which defies social distancing measures. In addition, a 30-second advertisement issued by the Hong Kong Government warning citizens not to participate in illegal activities and violence cost HK$499,000 to produce. Netizens criticized the government of wasting public resources.

Secretary of Education Kevin Yeung stated that if students and teachers insulted the national anthem, schools could call the police. Student unions criticized Yeung of threatening students, destroying the primary principle of education.

Japan, part of G7, expressed its concern over Hong Kong protests and arrests.[30]

A year ago over a million Hong Kong citizens took to the street protesting against the Hong Kong government's refusal to yield to citizens' demand to scrap the pro-Beijing extradition law.[31]

One year later Carrie Lam said in a press conference that “everyone has to learn a lesson. The SAR government has to learn a lesson, I hope each and every lawmaker will learn a lesson too."[32][33]

The one-year anniversary memorials were characterized by grassroots, flash-mob pro-democracy events "Lunch With You", a type of protest that had been repeatedly seen over the past months. The rallies of that day took place in Wai Chai, Central, Tai Koo, San Po Kong, Kwai Chung, Kwun Tong, and Kowloon Bay. Hundreds of peaceful protesters, students and elders included, showed up with signs and sang the protest anthem "Glory to Hong Kong".[34][35]

In all, police claimed that they made 53 arrests.[36][37]

Secretary for Education Kevin Yeung issued a statement to all the principals of schools and education institutions of Hong Kong. He stated that, the bureau opposes any form of class boycotts as it was considered a case of poor discipline. The board would closely follow-up if any schools violated this principle. He stated that, the anthem of the protest, Glory to Hong Kong, was "clearly propaganda" and that it should be banned in schools. However, those which were related to the Basic Law would not be considered with political influence, as it was part of 'moral education' for students. Yeung stated that another popular song in the protests, Do You Hear the People Sing? from the musical Les Miserables, would be allowed in principle, but that the situation and intent would be taken into account. Teachers would be provided with material for teaching the security law, as well as accompanying training in how to use it.[38]

Secretary for Security John Lee stated that if law enforcement from China were to enforce the national security law in Hong Kong, they had to respect the laws and regulations of Hong Kong. He also emphasized that the freedom and rights of citizens would not be affected or diminished after the implementation. He said that the police had enough skills and capabilities to deal with the national security law.

James Tien, member of a pro-Beijing party, stated that he understood the urgency to implement the national security law. When questioned about why he opposed Article 23 in 2003, he stated that no one called for Hong Kong independence at that time. He also proposed some suggestions towards the national security law, such as the power to allow Hong Kong law enforcement to enforce the law without the interference of others.

Four pro-democracy leaders, Jimmy Lai, Lee Cheuk-yan, Richard Tsoi and Albert Ho were charged for inciting others to defy a police ban and gather in Victoria Park. They received a call from police, informing them of the court summons. The alliance has been organising the vigil for 30 years, but the police issued an objection letter to the event this year, citing the prohibition on group gatherings of more than eight amid the COVID-19 pandemic.

A taxi-driver who drove his taxi and attempted to ram into crowds of protesters in October last year resulting in multiple injuries had still not been arrested or prosecuted by the police.[39] As a result, pro-democracy politician Ted Hui has filed a private prosecution against the taxi-driver and has been approved by the court.[40] Trial will begin on August 17, 2020.

June 12, 2020 marked the one year anniversary of occupying LegCo in Admiralty that successfully stopped the second reading of the Fugitive Offenders amendment bill. Hong Kong citizens, in this one year memorial, continued to come out in droves to show solidarity against the government and demand the riot charge to be removed in addition to denouncing police brutality. The original mass protest plan was scrapped as police, using the pandemic as a reason, declined to grant a "letter of no objection" (LONO). In addition, police declared that there would be heavy armed forces in Central to prevent any citizens from unlawful gatherings. As a result, the mass protest turned into a more localized commemorative event throughout Hong Kong. Rallies and gatherings occurred in Causeway Bay, Mongkok, Tsim Sha Tsu, Sha Tin, Yuen Long, Tuen Mun, and Tseun Wan. Throughout the day, police detained dozens of pro-democracy protesters as crowds gathered to mark the anniversary of the start of the protests.[41][42] and by the end of the day, police claimed that 43 individuals were arrested in Causeway Bay and Mong Kok, allegedly charged with unlawful gathering, among them several district representatives that had been elected in November 2019. One noticeable event was a pro-Beijing politician Kwong Sing-yu, who was arrested for wounding and attacking chanting citizens and an Epoch Times journalist in Kwun Tong.[43][44]

Secretary for Security John Lee stated that police officers would be given the authority to enforce the national security law as soon as possible after its implementation in Hong Kong.

On the anniversary of 12/6, protest activities sprung out all across Hong Kong. Riot police was on standby at different districts and conducted stop and searches of pedestrians. Ted Hui, pro-democracy activist, was arrested due to unlawful assembly. Hundreds of students from Heung To Middle School in Kowloon Tong formed a human chain around the school in support of the school's music teacher. The teacher's contract was not renewed allegedly due to his failure to prevent his students from performing Glory to Hong Kong in a music test.[45][46][47]

At night, a riot police officer shouted, in what seemed to be mockery of the United States over the George Floyd Protests and police brutality, slogans such as Black Lives Matter, I can't breathe towards the camera of a foreign journalist at the protest site.[48] The video went viral after 'BeWater HK' uploaded it on Facebook. Pro-democracy politicians condemned the conduct and actions of the police as 'unprofessional, unethical' and that their attitude was generally poor and disrespectful. According to the police, the police officer concerned was reprimanded for unprofessional conduct.[48]

One year ago today Lam also declared that the anti-extradition law will be indefinitely postponed. The day marked the one-year anniversary of the suicide of Marco Leung Ling-kit, which was linked to the anti-extradition protest. Tens of thousands of Hong Kong citizens gathered in Admiralty to pay tribute and respect to the first death since the protest began. Hundreds more people gathered locally in Tuen Mun, Causeway Bay, and Tin Shui Wai. The crowd laid flowers and paid their tributes to Leung. Riot officers stopped and searched some people clad in black and a man dressed, like Leung had been at his suicide, in a yellow raincoat. [49][50]

In an interview with Apple Daily, Leung's father gave a recording that it was a challenging year for him and that he was hoping to know if there was any injustice on that day his son fell from high ground. He also stated that he hoped youngsters would protect themselves, and to avoid getting hurt or injured by the government, so as to achieve further progress.

In Vancouver, Canada, numerous Canadians wearing black shirts raised yellow umbrellas and held high 'HK' signs in a peaceful rally in support of Hong Kong protests. In Berlin, Germany, peaceful protesters brought flowers and a coffin draped with a black HK flag, signifying that freedom and autonomy of Hong Kong had died. They also raised a banner which stated 'Germany stands with Hong Kong'. In Halifax, Canda, protesters raised banners and signs showing 'Stand with Hong Kong' to voice out support for the movement.[51]

Secretary of Security John Lee stated that the Police would form professional teams to enforce the national security law. All of those police officers qualified to enforce the law had to pass through a conduct test to ensure that they are fit for the role. He advised citizens to show respect for the law.

Labour unions proposed a strike in response to the national security law. Matthew Cheung stated that these are actions which harmed the interests of Hong Kong citizens, and that he expressed anger and regret over the initiative. He stated that the government would not turn a blind eye towards these matters. Cheung called on civil servants to 'tell facts from fiction and remain rational' to live up expectations of the general public.

A female teenager who got arrested by the riot police one year ago told the media that the police put her on a 'chokehold', in a manner such that she could not breathe.

A survey by Breakthrough Limited interviewed Hong Kong citizens regarding their views about the protests. 75% of those interviewed stated that they felt sad and upset, and 95% said that they felt the pain and despair. 94% teengaers stated that they would contribute towards the betterment of Hong Kong. It reflected that teenagers, in general, had emotional problem relating to this matter. 70% of those interviewed stated that the cause of the protest was based on decreasing amounts of freedom, democracy and human rights.[52]

Kwong Sing-yu, a former community organiser of pro-Beijing party DAB would appear in court as he was in connection with a stabbing incident in Kwun Tong. Kwong faced three charges of wounding, assault occasioning actual bodily harm and possession of a class one poison.

Politicians in the US urged multiple laws to be implemented and enforced in order to resist the CPC. Republicans formed the 'China Task Force', which analyses and collects data and information from China that poses as a threat towards the US, from aspects such as national security, economy, technology, competitiveness and awareness. They also proposed a law to sanction and punish the CPC of stealing technology which has been developed in the US.

Beijing asked the US for a joint meeting to discuss some sensitive matters. According to US newspaper Politico, if there was a meeting held between Chinese authorities and Pompeo, it would be the first meeting among these both countries after Hong Kong problems and the coronavirus pandemic.

Hong Kong and Macau Affairs Office deputy director Deng Zhonghua stated that under the proposed national security law, Beijing should retain jurisdiction under 'very special' circumstances. He said that, when national security has been severely threatened, the central government would always have the right to retain jurisdiction. He added that the arrangement would not undermine the independent judicial power and the final adjudication power of the SAR enshrined in the Basic Law.[53]

Dominic Raab condemned the HSBC for voicing out support for the national security law.[54] He stated that the law would violate the Sino-British Declarations and that it would diminish Hong Kong's status, freedom and autonomy. He urged Beijing to revoke the law.

Chief Executive of Hong Kong Carrie Lam condemned the opposition of 'demonizing' the national security law. Tam Yiu-chung, pro-Beijing politician, stated that the CPC never stated that all of the cases which would be related to the national security law would be held trial in Hong Kong.

Independent Police Complaints Council stated that there was 1844 complaints of police officers' misconduct related to the protest movements, up till 5th June. These 1844 complaints were from 8120 people, and that 2 police officers received disciplinary actions for speaking foul language. The police implemented 5 teams to follow up the complaints, and to hand over a report towards Carrie Lam before august.

Erick Tsang stated that the responsibility for the HKSAR to implement National Article 23 was still concrete and the HKSAR should be responsible to implement the law.

After the protest movements, a lot of teachers were deterred to present their political opinions. According to a survey by Hong Kong Professional Teachers' Union, 80% of those teachers interviewed said that they were worried parents would make complaints based on political bias. 60% of them avoided participating in demonstrations and rallies. The union stressed that the personal freedom and rights of teachers had already diminished.

Education Bureau advised secondary schools to provide counselling towards students and schoolmates who had been arrested in the protest movement. The bureau stated that the school should provide follow-up measures and assistance so as to implement positive values in the mindsets of the schoolchildren so that they would not break the law again.

Pro-democracy politician Ted Hui had started a private prosecution to prosecute the police officer of shooting a protester in the 11/11 protests in Sai Wan Ho. Kwan Kar-wing, a police officer, raised a handgun and fired shots towards a protester in midst of chaos at a Sai Wan Ho junction. Secretary for Justice Teresa Cheng said that it is her duty to intervene and stop private prosecutions that run against public interest or those brought by improper motives. On her blog, she wrote that private prosecutions which were 'groundless' and 'frivolous' should not be condoned. However, Cheng stated that she was not commenting on any individual case.

Hong Kong's competitiveness rank fell to fifth from second due to the social unrest, said the International Institute for Management Development, which is based in Lausanne, Switzerland.

UK condemned China's decision to propose the national security law. Politicians urged the Chinese government to respect the judiciary, human rights and organisations in Hong Kong, and to ensure the high level of autonomy and freedom of Hong Kong. However, China retaliated, saying that the UK has been interfering and meddling in internal affairs in China, and that the national security law was proposed in order to uphold national security and to fix the loopholes in the existing system.

The National People's Congress (NPC) commenced in Beijing. According to other information, national security law would be discussed throughout the meeting. Erick Tsang stated that if the Legislative Council candidates opposed the national security law, it would raise speculations and suspicions on whether the candidate was loyal to the government, which questioned his or her ability to be a member of the Legislative Council. However, he did not comment on whether it would lead to a disqualification in their ability to run as a member of Legco.

The Democratic Party received 2500 cases of BNO consultation, which was mostly related to matters such as administration processes and the qualifications for applying for the BNO.

The death of Luo Changqing had new progress after the police sparked an investigation. Luo, an elderly cleaner, was killed after he was hit in the head with a brick. He succumbed to his injuries the following day. According to surveillance camera footage, the police issued warrants for 14 other protesters who were suspected to be related. Most of them wore masks and dressed in black. The police advised the public to address the hotline if they had any information or details regarding these suspects.

Tam Yiu-chung, pro-China politician, stated that an option to defer Hong Kong citizens who broke the national security law to receive legal consequences in China would be discussed.

Patrick Nip condemned those civil servants who proposed an initiative to strike against the national security law. He said that their "stance" was problematic, that they opposed the national security law.

In a rare high-level talk in Honolulu, top Chinese diplomat Yang Jiechi told US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo to "stop meddling in Hong Kong's affairs". He stated that Beijing was determined to press on with the national security law in Hong Kong. According to US State Department spokeswoman Morgan Ortagus, Pompeo stressed "the need for fully reciprocal dealings between the two nations". He also stressed "the need for full transparency and information-sharing to combat the ongoing pandemic and prevent future outbreaks." The meeting lasted for 7 hours.[55]

G7 countries condemned the national security law and urged Beijing to revoke the law.[56] Chinese spokesman Zhao Lijian condemned these proposals, calling them an interference to the 'internal affairs' of China.

The European Parliament voted regarding matters of the National Security Law. In the voting session, 565 voted 'for' bring the CPC to the International Criminal Court in The Hague, while 34 voted 'against'.[57] Members stated that the law would diminish Hong Kong's autonomy, rule of law and freedom. Some members also urged the EU to sanction respective Chinese officials in accordance to their responsibilities over the national security law.

US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said that he would be 'closely monitoring' the 2020 Legislative Council Election in Hong Kong as he participated in the Copenhagen Democracy Summit. He said that the US was making impending decisions on further consequences and legal responsibilities to those who intended to diminish Hong Kong's freedom.[58]

President of Taiwan Tsai Ing-wen voiced out support towards Hong Kong protesters. She stated that Taiwan would continue providing humanitarian assistance towards those who are in need of help.[59]

As reported by the Standard, the security law was set to 'stop and punish foreign collusion'. Xinhua News Agency stated that the draft detailed the definitions of and penalties for secession, subversion, terrorism and colluding with foreign forces. Members of the pro-democracy Party voiced out concern and worries about the wordings in the draft document. Dennis Kwok, pro-democracy member of the Legislative COuncil, said that a lot of activities had to be dealt with foreign members of society, such as business exchanges. He said that it was 'ridiculous' to deem all of these activities as 'illegal'. He also said that the law was really about 'silencing Hong Kong's opposition'. However, Secretary of Justice Teresa Cheng refused to comment on the wording. She said that everyone should 'have peace of mind'.

Students of renowned local school Ying Wa College staged a peaceful assembly at Ying Wa College in order to pay their condolences towards those who died in the protest. Some students sang the protest anthem, Glory to Hong Kong. The school instantly issued a statement to express that the school authority did not agree with the actions of the students. In the statement, the school said students were not allowed to organise human chain activities, to shout slogans or to sing songs with political influence. If similar actions were proposed again, there would be proper counselling and disciplinary actions. However, the Education Bureau expressed concerns that follow-up actions would be initiated.

Education Bureau stated that on 1 January, 1 July, and 1 October, all schools had to raise the national flag and to sing the national anthem of China. However, all of these days have been recognized as holidays.

Raymond Yeung, a teacher at Diocesan Girls' School who taught liberal studies had not had his contract renewed by the school after he got shot in the eye during protests last year. He said that his teaching career at the school would end at 31st August. He did not instantly disagree with the results, as he considered his eye injury would lead to his ability to correct assignments to decrease and to diminish his teaching quality which he expected. He agreed that his participation in the social movement would increase awareness by the media. For the time being, he would write books which is related to his personal accounts of the protest. He has taught at the school for 4 years.[60]

Previously, legislative council member Ted Hui privately prosecuted Police Officer Kwan Kar-wing of shooting a protester with a handgun in the 11/11 protests in Sai Wan Ho. The case would be managed and investigated on 31st August, 2020. He prosecuted Kwan of 'shooting with intent' and for 'discharging ammunition with reckless disregard for the safety of others'.

Hong Kong Journalists Association reported in a survey which interviewed those working in the media industry that 98% of those interviewed opposed the national security law.

Legislative Council passed the decision to implement Andrew Cheung as the Chief Justice of the Court of Final Appeal.

Hospital Authority stated that they opposed the proposed strikes by hospital workers and medical staff working in the medical industry.

In a circular to all primary, secondary schools and kindergartens, the Education Bureau has advised schools to consider calling police if they cannot handle situations involving insulting behaviour by students or teachers when the national anthem is being played. In the circular, it stated that "teachers and students should stand solemnly and deport themselves with dignity while the national and regional flags are being raised, and observe etiquette while the national anthem is being played and sung to show respect for the country and demonstrate their good quality as nationals."

Thirty unions will conduct a 'referendum' tomorrow to consider whether to strike against the national security law. The unions' members are in the hotel industry, in information technology and civil servants.

Chinese Vice Premier Liu He said that the central government would always uphold the status of Hong Kong as One Country, Two Systems, and to give full support towards the role of Hong Kong as an international financial centre. He expressed that China would protect the rights and interests of international companies and investors in Hong Kong in order to maintain the city's long-term prosperity and stability.

Regarding the Legislative Council Elections in September, the committee stated that there would not be queues for allowing the elderly to cast their votes first. Barnabas Fung, Chairman of the Electoral Affairs Commission, stressed that there was no political consideration which led to this outcome.

There had been claims that Trump was secretly asking Xi Jinping for help to have him re-elected in the coming 2020 elections in the US. Trump quickly dismissed these claims, calling them 'lies'. He stated that no one was more 'anti-China' than he was.

According to a newspaper article by Headline Daily, past Chief Executive of the Hong Kong Monetary Authority Joseph Yam expressed his approval for the national security law. He stated that it would signify the end of 'social unrest' in Hong Kong. In addition, he also expressed that the US restrictions towards Hong Kong would be ineffective.

According to the Financial Times, Tokyo seeks to lure professional talent and business opportunities in order to boost Tokyo's competitiveness in East Asia. Japan could use this opportunity to make Tokyo a valid rival to Hong Kong as Hong Kong had been involved in protest incidents throughout the year. Japan is considering visa waivers, tax advice and free office space for asset managers, traders and bankers from Hong Kong in a campaign to cast Tokyo as the best exit strategy should a crisis force them out of the semi-autonomous territory.[61]

According to Tam Yiu-chung, legal consequences relating to the National Security Law would be approximately 3 years for minor incidents, 5 to 10 years for others. In addition, some of these crimes would be directly addressed by the Chinese Communist Party. In other words, the penalty for committing such crimes could result in a 10-year sentence, life imprisonment or even the death penalty. New People's Party (Hong Kong) instantly voiced out support for the law. The vice president of the Hong Kong Bar Association, Anita Yip, expressed concerns regarding the law towards judicial independence in Hong Kong, questioning the credibility of the rule of law under the national security law. Similar concerns were voiced out by the Civic Party as well.

One prominent policy proposed by the national security law was to enforce supervision and monitoring of schools and schoolchildren. Yip Kin-yuen, pro-democracy member of the Legislative Council representing the education sector, stressed that the government was attempting to stop students from voicing out support for the movement. He said that schools were starting to have follow-up actions regarding students who participated in social movements such as 'Sing with You' and slogan-calling.

Pro-democracy labour unions failed to initiate a strike against different sectors in the economy. The number of voters who voted in support for strikes was less than 5000, and it failed to surpass the 5000 benchmark. Leaders of the unions apologized for the results.

On Father's Day, netizens called for peaceful assemblies in shopping malls in Mong Kok, Shatin, Causeway Bay and Yuen Long. Around a hundred people shouted slogans and waved banners in MOKO and Langham Place. Some of them were families of four. Riot police was on standby and patrol at different districts and did not intervene. Since it was 11 months after the Yuen Long Attack, citizens shouted slogans in Yoho Mall at night. Glory to Hong Kong was sung.

Pro-democracy politician Lam Cheuk-ting issued a letter to Chris Tang, Commissioner of Police. He condemned Junius Ho of shaking hands with attackers in the Yuen Long Attack and Arthur Shek, founder of Hong Kong Economic Times for using words which contained violence in a pro-police rally. He criticized these two individuals for 'inciting violence and hatred' and warned the police not to blindly protect and support pro-police supporters. He called for a serious follow-up for these cases.

The office of pro-democracy district councillor Jimmy Sham was vandalized by an unknown man wearing glasses. The phrase 'puuk gaai' was spray-painted in Chinese, which is a common profanity used to curse others. Raphael Wong, pro-democracy social activist, stated that he would not be scared of political opponents of using such methods to spread political influence.

Another 2x20m banner was found on Beacon Hill which wrote 'Chinese Communist Party plans to assassinate Jimmy Lai'. This happened after media mogul Jimmy Lai, a pro-democracy activist outspoken on political affairs had been consistently followed by unknown men for six consecutive days. No motive was known as these unknown men declined to answer any questions raised by reporters.

The European Union warned China that it considered the proposed security law to be a breach of Beijing's international commitments. European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen and European Council chief Charles Michel told President Xi Jinping and Premier Li Keqiang of their "grave concern" over the new law.[62]

America restricted four more Chinese media outlets on June 22, brings the total number of designated Chinese media outlets to 9. The United States Department of State stated that it was reclassifying four organisations - China Central Television, China News Service, People's Daily and Global Times as foreign missions rather than media outlets in the United States.[63][64] This designation recognizes "PRC propaganda outlets as foreign missions and increases transparency relating to the CCP and PRC government’s media activities in the United States."[65] In response, China has threatened to retaliate against new US restrictions, escalating tensions between the two nations. Beijing criticized the move as bare-faced political suppression of Chinese media that further 'exposes the hypocrisy of the so-called freedom of speech and press which the US likes to flaunt'. Chinese spokesman Zhao Lijian urged the US to reject this Cold War mindset and ideological bias. If they failed to observe so, China will have no choice but to make an appropriate response

Isaac Cheng Ka-long, a member of pro-democracy group Demosisto, praised students and members of labour unions for voting despite 'white terror' influences in society. He stated that even though the number of votes was insufficient to spark a strike initiative, the organisation would still continue fighting for democracy in Hong Kong.

Johannes Chan, former dean of the Faculty of Law of the University of Hong Kong, voiced out concerns about the national security law. He criticized Beijing for failing to grant a high level of autonomy towards Hong Kong and that Hong Kong citizens would be potentially subject to the judicial system of China. He condemned the law and stated that he 'did not know what rights would be protected'.

Fukien Secondary School, a secondary school in Hong Kong with a long history of a pro-China stance, has distributed 'nationalist questionnaires' towards students. Students had to give feedback on their attitudes on the protest movement and to comment on their 'optimism' on One Country, Two Systems as well as 'the Great Rejuvenation of the Chinese Race'. Legislative Council members suspect the question was twisting Western values and politicizing issues inside school premises.

The Hong Kong Bar Association released a statement in which it said that Beijing's plan to give the Hong Kong Chief Executive the power to appoint judges would run contrary to the Hong Kong Basic Law.[66]

Lau Ka-tung, a social worker who had blocked police from advancing in protests in Yuen Long that occurred on 27 July 2019, had been sentenced to prison for one year for obstructing police while performing their duties. Numerous pro-democracy organisations protested outside the Lai Chi Kok Reception Centre. One hundred citizens participated. Participants criticized the judiciary on the sentencing, stating that Lau was merely providing humanitarian assistance. After one week of jail time, he objected successfully and the High Court eventually reverted the lower court decision and set bail to $10,000 HKD pending appeal.[67][68][69]

Seven people were charged with rioting by the police for their involvement in the 2019 Prince Edwards station attack on August 31, 2019.[70]

The United States issued a report on anti-terrorism on June 24. The report stated that there were no terrorist activities in Hong Kong, and condemned the Hong Kong government of labelling some pro-democracy protests as terrorism.[71]

Beijing officials met with 120 pro-establishment politicians to collect views and suggestions on the national security law, being the first time that Hong Kong politicians were consulted in Hong Kong by the CPC. The forum was hosted by Zhang Xiaoming, deputy director of the Hong Kong and Macao Affairs Office, and Zhang Yong, vice chairman of the Basic Law Committee. Pro-Beijing scholar Albert Chen and chairman of the Independent Police Complaints Council Anthony Neoh were also present.

A CUHK student was arrested along with her boyfriend for allegedly laundering HK $360 million over eight months. The Police force stated that the police are probing the origin and the whereabouts of the money as well as the background of the arrested, on whether there is any link to social unrest or rewards from other crimes committed.

It has been reported that the Chief Executive Carrie Lam is to hand-pick suitable judges for conducting national security law cases and violations as some professionals believed that it would harm judicial independence. However, Carrie Lam retaliated and mocked the Hong Kong Bar Association for being 'inexperienced'. Former Chief Justice of Hong Kong Andrew Li had warned of such actions 'undermining' the judicial independence of Hong Kong. He stressed that the CE of Hong Kong had no professional expertise, ability or experience to pick judges. Holden Chow criticized the saying of the Bar Association, stating that they were causing a 'false' image towards citizens.

The national security law is estimated to be passed on 30 June. The Taiwanese government, headed by President Tsai Ing-wen, has introduced humanitarian aid for those who are self-exiled to Taiwan. The plan is set to be implemented on 29th June, where restrictions are eased for immigration of Hong Kong citizens and Macao citizens. Some Hong Kong protesters welcomed this initiative, but hoped that the government could further provide 'protection' towards those seeking asylum. Those immigrating to Taiwan must comply with quarantine measures due to COVID-19, such as self-isolating for 14 days. The hotline of Taipei Economic and Cultural Office in Hong Kong, which provides relevant and related expertise and information has been jammed as a lot of citizens have called them, in hope of having their queries answered. After the jam, the office stated that a reservation must be booked in order for a successful telephone call to be organised and coordinated.

The United States Senate unanimously passed a bill sanctioning China over its political interference of Hong Kong democracy and freedom. The bipartisan bill, called "Hong Kong Autonomy Act", [72]will "impose mandatory sanctions on entities that violate China's obligations to Hong Kong under the Joint Declaration and the Basic Law. The legislation would also impose mandatory secondary sanctions on banks that do business with the entities in violation of the Basic Law." [73][74][75]

A real estate agent, Ho Hiu-long, stuck a leaflet supportive of pro-democracy protests at the back of an undercover police officer. He has been sued for attacking police officers in court. In court, in his defense, he planned to use an "innovative" method to reinforce the five demands, so he stuck it on an undercover police officer dressed in black as he mistook him as the organizer of the event at 'Shop With You' at Harbour City in Tsim Sha Tsui on 24th December. The case would further have the verdict pronounced on 15th July.

A stage designer, surnamed Yiu, had been sentenced to four years of prison by Annie Woodcock, a judge for attempting to throw a Molotov cocktail. Woodcock stated that Yiu had neglected the safety of the police officers, and therefore he should be disregarded as a protester, and should, consequently, be regarded as a criminal. However, in Yiu's defence, his mother had died recently and that he hoped to take care of his father when he is still alive. The defense also stated that Yiu was unable to attend university in Taiwan and to locate his dream job due to family problems. Lots of citizens waved and assembled as the van containing Yiu left court grounds, and several family members cried in despair and sadness.

John Lee, Secretary for Security, neither denied nor admitted questions asked about whether there would be a time limit set for interrogating detainees who have been arrested due to violations of the national security law. He did not give a stance to the relevant accusations, and reinstated the fact that there have not been implicit details relating to the law. He commented that all comments and analysis are all based on personal opinion and assumption.

After Carrie Lam mocked the Hong Kong Bar Association recently, the usually conservative Law Society of Hong Kong condemned the national security law and issued a statement, stressing that the judicial process relating to the national security law would undermine judicial independence in Hong Kong. Members of the society criticized that it would lead to major suspicions on whether basic human rights such as right to a fair trial can be sustained. The society hoped that the government could assert the queries as soon as possible. In addition, they also remarked that if stakeholders from all sectors of society could be consulted in the drafting process, it would enhance confidence among the public, and it would not violate the Basic Law as well as the one country, two systems principle.

Pro-China politician Tam Yiu Chung stated in an interview, that he had only 'briefly' scanned through the details and content of the national security law. He had remarked this based on queries and suspicions relating to the definition of 'coordinating with foreign forces and foreign countries'.

Chief Executive Carrie Lam signed the draft proposal for Andrew Cheung to be officially the new Chief Justice of the Court of Final Appeal, succeeding current Chief Justice of the Court of Final Appeal Geoffrey Ma on 11th January, 2021.

According to a report by Apple Daily, the police force had secretly changed some of its rules and regulations without directly informing the public. They included: riot police and undercover police officers did not have to show their police identification materials instantly under specific circumstances; in a group of police, only the most senior officer showing police identification materials would be adequate and other police officers did not have to necessarily do so; and that riot police officers did not have to show their identification materials and code on their riot police uniforms.

Netizens called for an assembly in IFC, in memory of those protesters and those who have been sentenced to jail. Around 20 citizens chanted slogans and sang "Glory to Hong Kong" in the assembly. They also wrote letters and words towards those in prison, encouraging them to pursue their dreams and ambitions. Some people also waved the Flag of Hong Kong (1959–1997).

Publication of several books about last year's protest movement have been suspended as white terror (culture of fear) fears rise from the national security law. Greenfield, a bookstore with the 'largest collection of sensitive books', will not take part in the book fair, despite having played a significant role in the fair for three decades. This occurred after some pro-China, pro-police netizens called for a throughout inspection of books and publications circulated around the fair to prevent some pro-democracy materials and publications being widely circulated. If they found books which were pro-democracy, they would report it to authorities at once.

Sources told Sing Tao Daily that a number of police officers set to retire next year will extend their service period to join the new department to handle crimes related to the national security law. This occurred after the Secretary for Security John Lee stated that the force would establish a department to handle matters related to the national security law.

Hong Kong 1 July marches have been annual peaceful pro-democracy demonstrations. This year's theme was scheduled to be opposing the national security law. The plan was to walk from Causeway Bay to Chater Garden in Central. The pro-democracy camp submitted a proposal towards the police force. It was suggested that, to comply with social distancing measures, 35 people would walk in a group, and one group would walk every 35 seconds. Masks and sanitizer would also be distributed to those who join the demonstrations. The pro-democracy camp put a street stall which was about the opposition of the national security law.

The Red Cross organised a blood donation activity in Kowloon Bay Police Station. Police officers were to have their blood transfused. However, a staffer of the Red Cross wore accessories such as 'corrupt cops, may your whole family die' and 'against police brutality'. The police said that the incident was unsettling. After carrying out a risk assessment, the police called off the event. The police generally regarded it offensive, and the Red Cross apologized and stated that it has followed up based on the Hospital Authority's established complaint mechanism. In the statement, it said that 'the service and attitude of a Red Cross staff was not ideal that day, and that caused some of the blood donors to feel uneasy. The service center's supervisor at the scene took care of the incident right away.' Due to this incident, both pro-democracy and pro-Beijing supporters and netizens criticized the Red Cross, sparking an online war.

A pro-Beijing businesswoman who owns 'flight attendant beef rice', a restaurant which have been widely controversial due to its blatant support of the police force, has sued RTHK director Leung Ka-wing due to 'false claims' and 'biased wordings' in their information channels. Annie Kwok Tak-ying, the pro-China businesswoman who stated that she was 'shallow blue' (in mild support of the police) in an interview before. She condemned the protesters who blocked the airport and admitted that the business of her shop had worsened due to the protests. Contradictions occurred on the source of her income. Eunice Yung was decided to be the prosecution barrister for this case. She would sue them for 'misconduct of civil servants'. However, the Court decided to deny the private prosecution due to the lack of direct evidence.

Pro-China politician Elsie Leung stated that Beijing decided not to disclose the full text of the national security law as it aimed to prevent further 'unrest' and delays to the legislation. She said that making the bill public "may cause demonstrations and strong opposition against the law." She further stressed that Beijing does not want to see social unrest or vandalism in Hong Kong. She also dismissed fears law drafters might not have taken public opinion into consideration. Leung said that it was highly likely that it could be implemented by the end of June, and it would come in effect on 1st July. Leung emphasized that by calling out words and slogans such as 'Liberate' would violate the national security law as it was an 'act to separate the idea of One Country, Two Systems.' She also defended plans for Carrie Lam to hand-pick judges to handle the national security law cases. In response, pro-democracy lawmaker James To disagreed with her views, saying it would mark the end of judicial independence. He stated that Lam would be likely to select judges based on political consideration.

Pui Ching Middle School, a band-1 'top-tier' secondary school in Hong Kong, had signed a joint petition comprising of alumni, students and 2 teaching professionals. One of them had been the vice principal of the school. The school authority issued a statement online, stressing that schools are education institutions for students to learn in a comfortable manner, and that no political influence should be allowed at school premises. The statement also addressed the claim that they would follow the instructions given by the EDB. Pro-democracy organisations condemned the EDB for suppressing students' opinion in school, and emphasized that petitions are the most peaceful way to show the opinions of students. However, the EDB stated that they would request the school to follow-up, explain and submit a report relating to the incident. The Pui Ching anti-elab, the social media platform of Pui Ching alumni and students used for protest and social movements for spreading information and connecting alumni, stated that they would support the teachers and students who are subject to consequences. They condemned the statements of the EDB, stating that personal freedom of speech has always been protected in the Basic Law. In addition, the teachers have their own rights and choices to choose if they would participate in the petition, and it is irrelevant to his or her professionalism in teaching and education. They expressed regret towards the reply of the EDB, and stressed that it was a case of double standards.

At Yoho Mall in Yuen Long, at around 1:30 p.m., dozens stood on different floors and chanted pro-democracy slogans after a man in the atrium displayed pro-democracy banners. Riot police entered the mall and set up cordons, but were unable to clear the mall from protesters, who continued to chant slogans. A Stand News reporter was pushed over by plainclothes officers. Police arrested 14 people for unlawful assembly, among them 9 men and 5 women, with their ages ranging from 14 to 55 years. A 12-year old student reporter was taken away. Police used pepper spray during the last part of its operations, which hit Yuen Long District Councillor Lam Chun and Kalvin Ho, Vice-Chairman of the Hong Kong Association for Democracy and People's Livelihood.[76]

For the first time since 2003 the annual July 1st march this year will be banned by police, citing pandemic health concerns.[77]