Scottish Libertarian Party

The Scottish Libertarians are extremely pro-free market. They are against the idea of the welfare state and would like to see all sectors run privately, including education and healthcare. They are against the idea of the government owning all the property in the country, saying, "Every person has a right to their justly earned or created property to use, sell, rent, lend, or dispose of as they choose... What is commonly seen as property ownership in the United Kingdom is in fact property use.  The actual owner remains the government." They also advocate for the abolition of all taxes with the exception of income tax. They say that they recognise that income tax is the primary means of funding the government, and that until a better alternative is found, the would reduce this tax to a smaller, flat tax.[20] They also want to abolish corporate welfare, subsidies and special privileges for big businesses.[21]

The party is against all tariffs and supports the idea of unilateral free trade with all other countries.[22]

On inflation, the party says, "...the Scottish Libertarians advocate a monetary system based on gold, silver, or both and denounce the fiat money system and the central banking system that creates inflation."[20]

The Scottish Libertarians believe that "there are no groups" when it comes to issues such as gender equality and sexual orientation, instead stating "There are only people and people come individually."[20]

On crime and justice, they say that the rights of the person accused must never be undermined, such as the rights of due process, a speedy trial, legal counsel, trial by jury, and the legal presumption of innocence until proven guilty. In their 2016 Scottish Parliament manifesto, they stated that individuals have the right to live how they want to live, as long as they don't harm others. They also said that they would prefer a more restorative justice system.[20][21]

The party is for the legalisation of all drugs and would end what they call the costly and ineffective War on drugs. They also support the decriminalisation of prostitution in line with the New Zealand Model, as advocated by Amnesty International.[20][21]

The party is very pro-free speech, and are against all restrictions against what people say. They are also against restrictions of what the SNP describes as "hate speech." The party's leader, Tam Laird, wrote once that he lived in Zambia as a boy. He said that he enjoyed it, but criticising the president, the army and UNIP (the party the President Kenneth Kaunda was leader of) were crimes. He complained that, in time, the situation would be the same in Scotland, comparing it to the boiling frog theory.[23][24]

The party supports Scottish independence, because they say that their policies are impossible to enact under the current political situation. However, unlike most other pro-independence Scottish parties, they are against the EU, as they claim that rejoining it after independence would "simply be trading one foreign master for another." They are willing to work with the EU for reduction of barriers to trade and movement of people between Scotland and the EU. They are against all tariffs and wish for the country to adopt unilateral free trade.[20][21][22] They have voiced support for Liberland.

On immigration, the party takes a very liberal stance, and support easy immigration to Scotland. However, they support "reasonable controls... to prevent the entry of foreign nationals who pose a credible threat to security, health, or property."[21][25]

When it comes to international conflicts and warfare, the party argues for diplomacy as the primary option for resolution and rejects the use of force, either militant or economic, as a means of achieving the international goals. Should diplomacy fail and the life, liberty, or property of the nation was at stake, then war becomes the only option remaining and will be officially declared through the passage of legislation.[25]

The party believes that education is best facilitated by the free market and that schools should be managed locally to achieve greater accountability and parental involvement.[20]

They consider the current healthcare system to be poorly performing and would heavily reform it. They would replace it with a system of compulsory insurance, modelled on the Dutch system, aiming to increase patient choice over the level of health care they require and flexibility to choose where they wish to receive their health treatments. They also would legislate to allow for Assisted suicide or 'dignified death'.[21]