Munich Security Conference

The Munich Security Conference (MSC; German: Münchner Sicherheitskonferenz) is an annual conference on international security policy that has taken place in Munich, Bavaria since 1963. Former names are Wehrkundetagung and Münchner Konferenz für Sicherheitspolitik.[1] It is the world's largest gathering of its kind.

Munich Security Conference
MottoPeace through Dialog
PredecessorInternationale Wehrkundebegegnung / Münchner Wehrkundetagung
Formation1963 / 2011
FounderEwald-Heinrich von Kleist-Schmenzin
Legal statusNon-profit foundation
Location
MethodsHost conferences
Chairman
Wolfgang Ischinger
WebsiteSecurityConference.de
53rd Munich Security Conference 2017
50th Munich Security Conference 2014

Over the past four decades the Munich Security Conference has become the most important independent forum for the exchange of views by international security policy decision-makers. Each year it brings together about 350 senior figures from more than 70 countries around the world to engage in an intensive debate on current and future security challenges.

The list of attendees includes Heads of States, Governments and International Organizations, Ministers, Members of Parliament, high-ranking representatives of Armed Forces, Science, Civil society as well as Business and Media.

The conference is held annually in February. The venue is the Hotel Bayerischer Hof in Munich, Germany. The 56th Security Conference was held from 14 to 16 February 2020.

History

The conference evolved from the Internationale Wehrkundebegegnung / Münchner Wehrkundetagung,[2] which was founded in 1963 by Ewald-Heinrich von Kleist-Schmenzin.[3] The resistance fighter from the Stauffenberg circle advocated to prevent military conflicts such as the Second World War in the future and brought together leaders and experts in security policy for this reason. The first meeting was limited to about 60 participants; among them were Helmut Schmidt and Henry Kissinger.[4] Von Kleist led the meetings until 1997; his successor who led them from 1999 until 2008 was politician and business manager Horst Teltschik (CDU). Since 2009, the conference is headed by the former diplomat Wolfgang Ischinger. Ischinger established the Munich Security Conference gGmbH non-profit foundation in 2011, which he has led since then.[1][5]

The Munich Security Conference was canceled twice, in 1991 due to the First Gulf War and 1997 as a result of the retirement of Kleist-Schmenzin.[1] Under the leadership of Teltschik the Security Conference opened in 1999 for political, military and business leaders from Central and Eastern Europe as well as India, Japan and the People's Republic of China.

Purpose

At this conference, under the theme of peace through dialogue, senior politicians, diplomats, military and security experts from the member countries of NATO and the European Union, but also from other countries such as China, India, Iran, Japan and Russia are invited to discuss the current issues in security and defense policies.

The intention of the conference is to address the topical main security issues and to debate and analyze the main security challenges in the present and the future in line with the concept of networked security. A focal point of the conference is the discussion and the exchange of views on the development of the transatlantic relations as well as European and global security in the 21st century.

The conference is organized privately and therefore not an official government event. It is used exclusively for discussion; an authorization for binding intergovernmental decisions does not exist. Furthermore, there is - contrary to usual conventions - no common final communiqué. The high-level meeting is also used to discrete background discussions between the participants. An exception is the presentation of global political decisions, such as the exchange of instruments of ratification for the New START disarmament agreement between the United States and Russia, which was held at the conclusion of the security conference in 2011.

Conferences

Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych meeting Hillary Clinton at the Munich Security Conference 2012

At the 39th Conference 2003, German Minister for Foreign Affairs Fischer doubted to the reasoning of the US government for a war against Iraq with the words "Excuse me, I am not convinced".[6]

From February 6–8, 2009, the 45th Munich Security Conference[7] was attended by over 50 ministers and more than a dozen heads of state and government from all over the world, including US-Vice-President Joe Biden, French President Nicolas Sarkozy, German Chancellor Angela Merkel, Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk and Afghan President Hamid Karzai.

In 2009 the MSC inaugurated the Ewald von Kleist Award.[8] The new award highlights the political life and work of Ewald von Kleist, who founded the Munich Security Conference. The award will be given to prominent individuals who have made an outstanding contribution to peace and conflict resolution. The winners of the Ewald von Kleist Award were in 2009 Dr Henry Kissinger and in 2010 Javier Solana de Madariaga. Also in 2009, the MSC initiated a new event format, called MSC Core Group Meeting.[9] This new and smaller-scale event was introduced in addition to the annual main, Munich-based meeting of the Munich Security Conference. The idea is to invite a number of distinguished and high-ranking participants to changing capitals and give them the opportunity to confidentially discuss current international security policy issues and develop sustainable solutions. Meetings took place 2009 in Washington D.C., 2010 in Moscow and 2011 in Beijing.

48th Munich Security Conference 2012: From left - Mario Monti, Josef Ackermann, Robert B. Zoellick, Peer Steinbrück, George Soros

The 47th Munich Security Conference[10] was held from February 4–6, 2011 and has again assembled top-level decision makers from all over the world, including UN Secretary General Ban Ki Moon, German Chancellor Angela Merkel, British Prime Minister David Cameron U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov whilst Belarus has been excluded from the circle of MSC attendees because of the country's human rights situation.

In 2011 two special features marked the growing role of the Munich Security Conference as center of attention of international security policy: European Union's High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Catherine Ashton called for the Quartet on the Middle East, consisting of the EU, Russia, the United States and the UN, to meet within the setting of the 2011 Munich Security Conference and during a ceremony on the sidelines of the conference Russia's Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov and U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton exchanged the instruments for ratifying the New START Treaty (Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty) that entered into force in Munich New START.

The 48th Munich Security Conference was held from February 2–5, 2012.

Conference 2019

The 55th Munich Security Conference (MSC 2019) took place from 15 to 17 February 2019 at the Hotel Bayerischer Hof in Munich. Among the 600[11] participants were heads of state and government from more than 35 countries, 50 foreign and 30 defence ministers, other representatives from the fields of politics, the military, the arms industry, business and science, as well as members of international intergovernmental and civil society organizations.[12]

Welcome

The chairman of the conference Wolfgang Ischinger opened the event with the motto "The Great Puzzle: Who Will Pick Up the Pieces?"[13] The question was also discussed in the "Munich Security Report", the annual publication accompanying the event.[14][15][16] Ischinger described "a reorganization of central building blocks of the international order", which is characterized by a new era of Great Power rivalries between the USA, China and Russia as well as a certain leadership vacuum in the "liberal world order".[17] Prior to this he had emphasized the importance of multilateralism in today's world and described the European Union in this context as "alive and kicking".[13]

Opening statements

Federal Defence Minister Ursula von der Leyen and British Defence Minister Gavin Williamson spoke at the opening.[18] Both politicians advocated greater European cooperation in defence.[19] Williamson highlighted the growing global threats and stressed the importance of the continued close cooperation of the NATO partners despite Brexit,[20] as NATO is indispensable for the protection of citizens. Von der Leyen spoke of "the Great Powers returning to rivalry", which also affected Germany and Europe[21] She declared that she would continue to support a closer military cooperation between the EU and the United Kingdom even after Brexit.[17]

Among the main topics of the conference were "the self-assertion of the European Union, transatlantic cooperation and the possible effects of a new era of competition between major powers"[12] When discussing European security, the European NATO members' defence budgets were also discussed. Other topics included the security situation in the Sahel, Eastern Europe, Southeastern Europe, the Middle East and Syria, and non-proliferation of nuclear weapons and trade barriers.[22]

International cooperation

During a panel discussion on the future of defense alliances, the Japanese Foreign Minister Tarō Kōno called for greater international cooperation for the protection of the international order: "If the U.S. can no longer act alone as a policeman, Japan, Europe and other like-minded countries will have to increase burden-sharing"[23] Other participants in the discussion, however, expressed doubts as to whether cooperating Central Powers will be able to stand their ground against rivaling goals of the Great Powers.[19][24]

The Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif criticized the USA's demand to the Europeans to withdraw from the nuclear agreement with Iran and urged the European states to make a greater effort to preserve the agreement.[25]

Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty (INF)

Another focus of the conference was the INF Treaty. The speeches of the Vice President of the United States Mike Pence and the Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov made it clear that the failure of the INF Treaty can hardly be prevented.[26] NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg described the consequences of a failure of the INF Treaty as "very serious".[17] In order to save the treaty, some participants expressed the hope that China would participate in the negotiations on medium-range nuclear systems, but this was rejected by the Chinese foreign policy expert Yang Jiechi,[19] as China rejects a "multilateralisation of the INF Treaty for the Asia-Pacific region".[27] India expressed similar sentiments.[19] Chancellor Merkel warned against "blind rearmament" should the INF Treaty fail.[24]

Transatlantic relations

When discussing transatlantic relations Observers described "rifts between the USA and Germany". These were also evident in the speech by Vice President Mike Pence, who defended US policy and called on European states to give the US more support in the conflicts with Iran or the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline project.[26][24] NATO Secretary General Stoltenberg emphasized the importance of multilateral structures and transatlantic cooperation in his speech.[28] German Chancellor Angela Merkel also emphasized the importance of international cooperation: "We must not break this up"[29] Within the US delegation, opinions were divided.[30] Former US Vice President Joe Biden, for example, was very critical of the current president's policies: "This will pass! We'll be back!"[26][24]

Climate change and security

For the first time since the conference was founded, a panel discussion on the topic of "Climate Change and Security" was included in the conference's main programme. The German climate researcher Hans Joachim Schellnhuber warned sternly about the consequences of climate change. Bunny McDiarmid, co-managing director of Greenpeace, explained the European Fridays for Future movement to the audience and said: "We have schoolchildren marching in the streets because they don't believe that politicians act fast enough."[31] Amnesty International Secretary-General Kumi Naidoo warned: "Nature does not negotiate."[26] Representatives of the US government did not take part in the discussion. However, former US Secretary of State John Kerry sat in the audience and declared politics as being in the process of committing "consensual suicide of our planet".[31]

Participants

Among the heads of state and government attending the event were German Chancellor Angela Merkel, President Petro Poroshenko of Ukraine,[32] Abdel Fattah el-Sisi of Egypt, Ashraf Ghani of Afghanistan, Klaus Iohannis of Romania, as well as the Prime Minister of Bangladesh, Hasina Wajed, and the Emir of Qatar, Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani.

The US delegation included US Vice President Mike Pence, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Nancy Pelosi, the daughter of the US President, Ivanka Trump, and her husband Jared Kushner.[12]

Other guests included Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, EU Foreign Affairs Commissioner Federica Mogherini, NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg, IMF Director Christine Lagarde, Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammed Jawad Sarif, Iraqi Foreign Minister Mohamed Ali Alhakim, the British Minister of Defence Gavin Williamson and his French colleague Florence Parly,[17] Yang Jiechi, as a member of the Politburo of the Chinese Communist Party responsible for foreign policy,[18] and the Nobel Peace Prize winners Tawakkol Karman and Beatrice Fihn.

On behalf of the German Federal Government, in addition to Chancellor Merkel and Defence Minister von der Leyen, Foreign Minister Heiko Maas, Vice-Chancellor and Finance Minister Olaf Scholz, Economics Minister Peter Altmaier, Health Minister Jens Spahn and Agriculture Minister Julia Klöckner attended the conference.[12]

The French President Emmanuel Macron,[33] as well as the Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu[34] have cancelled their visit.

Award ceremonies

This year, the annual Ewald von Kleist Preis awarded at the conference was awarded to the Prime Ministers of Greece, Alexis Tsipras, and Northern Macedonia, Zoran Zaev, for their agreement in the name dispute between the two countries.[35] For the first time during the conference, the John McCain Dissertation Award for outstanding research on security-political issues was presented.[36]

Side events

In addition to the main conference there were numerous side events, including the Munich Young Leaders Program organized by the MSC and the Körber Foundation,[37] and other events on climate change and security hosted by the United Nations Environment Programme, energy security, cyber security, health security and international threats.[27]

Evaluation

According to conference chairman Wolfgang Ischinger, it was one of the most important conferences of recent years, as it had become clear that the international system was under extreme threat. By far the most important speech, in his opinion, came from Angela Merkel. As a negative tendency, it could be observed that although conflict parties used the conference to present their position, they did not want to discuss with each other what had originally been the strength of the conference.[14]

Conference 2018

António Guterres, Qatar's Emir Tamim bin Hamad and NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg
Russian Senator Aleksey Pushkov and former U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry

The 54th Munich Security Conference (MSC 2018) took place from the 16 to 18 February 2018 at the Hotel Bayerischer Hof in Munich.

Opening

Federal Defense Minister Ursula von der Leyen and French Defence Minister Florence Parly[38] spoke at the opening and reaffirmed their commitment to stronger military cooperation.[39] According to von der Leyen, (Permanent Structured Cooperation/PESCO)[40] marks an important step towards a European Security and Defense Union.[41] Parly added: PESCO should ignite a "Cultural Revolution" coming, followed by further projects.[42]

Agenda

The Munich Security Report 2018 was published before the conference with the title? "To the Brink - and Back?".[43] The key themes of the conference and the Munich Security Report 2018 included the crisis of the liberal international order[44] and the consequences from Donald Trumps first year of US presidency.[45] "Last year, the world moved too close to a major international conflict," MSC chairman Wolfgang Ischinger stated in the run-up to the conference. "The rhetorical escalations of individual decision-makers are very worrying, whether on the Korean peninsula, in the Gulf or in Eastern Europe - if someone makes a wrong decision in charged situations, that could quickly set off a dangerous chain reaction," Ischinger warned.[46]

In particular, the future and capacity of the European Union and its relations with Russia and the United States were on the agenda of the MSC 2018.[47] In addition, the threat of the liberal international order, the numerous conflicts in the Middle East - in particular the worsening relations between the Gulf States - and the development of the political situation in the Sahel were discussed. Also disarmament issues were discussed, especially with respects to the conflict over the North Korean nuclear program.[47]

Panel discussions took place on the following topics:

Participants

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu displays a piece of an armed Iranian drone that was shot down over Israel after infiltrating from Syria.[48] The idea to display the drone piece came from his spokesman David Keyes.[49]

Benjamin Netanyahu was the first-ever Israeli Prime Minister to take part in the conference.[50] While delivering his remarks, Netanyahu brandished a wing flap from an Iranian drone that infiltrated Israel a few weeks earlier and was shot down.[51] Netanyahu's dramatic display grabbed headlines around the world and inspired memes on social media.[52] Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif called Netanyahu's prop a "cartoonish circus" that "does not even deserve the dignity of a response."[53] Netanyahu said the fact that Zarif was forced to respond was "the whole point" of the display and a public relations win.[54] Netanyahu's spokesman David Keyes was credited for his role in shaping the prime minister's media strategy.[55][56]

Other guests included UN Secretary-General António Guterres,[57] EU Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker[58] and NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg.

Arriving from the US were Secretary of Defense General James Mattis[59] and National Security Advisor to US President Donald Trump, H.R. McMaster.[60] The delegation of the US Congress was chaired by Senators Sheldon Whitehouse[61] and Robert Corker.[62]

Other visiting heads of state and heads of government included Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko,[63] Rwandan President Paul Kagame,[64] and Emir of Qatar Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani.[65] The Prime Minister of the United Kingdom Theresa May,[66] her Austrian counterpart Chancellor Sebastian Kurz[67] and the Turkish Prime Minister Binali Yıldırım[66] also participated in the MSC, as well as the Polish Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki[68] and the Iraqi Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi.[69]

Numerous international organizations were also represented at MSC 2018. Secretary-General of the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe Thomas Greminger, Chief Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court Fatou Bensouda and Director of the International Monetary Fund Christine Lagarde[70] participated. Other participants also included, Commission President of the African Union Moussa Faki Mahamat,[71] Director of the World Food Programme David Beasley, President of the International Committee of the Red Cross Peter Maurer,[72] and Executive Director of Human Rights Watch Kenneth Roth.[73]

Representatives of the leading federal regimes which attended the conference together with more than 30 members of parliament from all political groups were Federal Foreign Minister Sigmar Gabriel, Defense Minister Ursula von der Leyen, Federal Interior Minister Thomas de Maizière[74]and Federal Minister for Economic Cooperation and Development, Gerd Müller.[75]

Side events

The main conference was accompanied by numerous side events organized by international institutions and organizations. These included the United Nations,[57] the African Union, the International Committee of the Red Cross, the Organization for Security and Cooperation in, NATO, and NGOs and institutions such as the Robert Bosch Stiftung, the International Cooperation Agency (GIZ), Transparency International, German Aerospace Center, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, the Center for Strategic and International Studies and the Atlantic Council.

In addition, there were public events such as a literary series with the Börsenverein des Deutschen Buchhandels (German book trade association ) and several events on technology and cyber issues. On the eve of the conference, MSC hosted a "Town Hall Meeting" entitled "The Force Awakens: Artificial Intelligence and Modern Conflict" at the Hotel Bayerischer Hof.

Award ceremonies

The American politician John McCain was awarded the Ewald-von-Kleist-Preis for his services to the transatlantic relationship and the security conference. Since Senator McCain could not travel to Munich due to illness, his wife Cindy accepted the prize for him.[76] For many years, Senator McCain led the US congressional delegations at security conferences.[77] Wolfgang Ischinger, chairman of the conference, was awarded the Nunn-Lugar Award for Promoting Nuclear Security by the Carnegie Corporation and the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

Statements

Nicholas Burns, the former US Ambassador to NATO, stated: "We have troops in Poland and three Baltic countries. I think NATO is unified. We have to continue the sanctions against Russia."[78] Konstantin Kosachev, the chairman of the Foreign Affairs Committee of the Russian Senate, claimed that "NATO’s continued existence provokes new threats, rather than overcoming them. This conference has always been anti-Russian. Unfortunately, they try to blame Russia for all the problems facing the West."[78] German Foreign Minister Sigmar Gabriel accused Russia and China of trying to "undermine" the liberal Western world order. Gabriel said that "Nobody should attempt to divide the European Union: not Russia, not China and also not the United States."[79]

Security Measures

The Munich city center was guarded by 4,000 police officers. According to the police, around 20 counter-demonstrations were planned.[50]

Conference 2017

The 53rd Munich Security Conference (MSC 2017) took place from 17 to 19 February 2017 at the Bayerischer Hof hotel in Munich. With a total of 680 participants,[80] including 30 heads of state and government, nearly 60 representatives of international organizations and 65 top business leaders,[81] it was the largest conference to date.[80] Prominent guests and speakers were UN Secretary General António Guterres, US Vice President Mike Pence, US Secretary of Defense James Mattis, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, Federica Mogherini, Donald Tusk and Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi. 700 journalists were also accredited for the event. In addition to the main events of the security conference, there were 1,350 bilateral meetings among MSC participants and delegations.[82]

Opening

The German Defense Minister, Ursula von der Leyen, and the new US Defense Secretary James Mattis, opened the conference together. In her speech, the German minister also commented on the controversy between Berlin and Washington regarding the appropriate level of defense spending,[83] stating: "We Germans have understood that after a period where we reaped the benefits of a peace dividend, we must now persistently invest in a security contingency reserve." At the same time, von der Leyen stressed the importance of close transatlantic cooperation[84] and said that Germany would "bear a larger, a fairer part of the burdens for the common Atlantic security". The minister said "NATO is not self-evident - neither for America nor for the Europeans".[85] At the same time, she pointed out that burden sharing among alliance partners was not a financial question at first but one where both partners should practice mutual support for each other. "This excludes all unilateral action – both unilaterally rushing ahead as well as unilaterally ducking responsibility", continued von der Leyen.[86] This reaffirmed her call for a common position and approach by NATO against Russia and the Islamic state.[87] At the same time, the principle that Islamic terror should be fought against and not Islam itself should be applied. Von der Leyen stressed that the world needs a "globally committed, responsible America".[85]

Her US counterpart, James Mattis, in his brief address, combined his country's clear commitment to NATO's collective defense with a strong demand for Europeans to boost their collective defense spending.[84] Secretary Mattis advocated a binding plan to meet the payment commitments made in 2014 in Wales and 2016 in Warsaw.[87] Mattis stressed that the Alliance should remain "credible, capable and relevant"[88] so that Europeans and Americans could jointly resist the enemies of democracy,[87] and both sides of the Atlantic share the legacy of friendship, freedom, and a trusting alliance. "American security is permanently tied to European security," and "Security is at its highest when a team makes sure of it," said Mattis.[83]

The future of the EU

During a panel discussion on the future of the European Union entitled "Together or Separated" there was a clear disagreement between the Polish Foreign Minister, Waszczykowski and the Vice President of the European Commission Timmermans, described by observers as a "clash of civilizations on a small-scale".[89] The dispute was triggered by Timmermans' accusing the Polish government of spreading "alternative facts". "The EU is built on rights and values," Timmermans said, stressing that judges should not be subject to directives by governments. The common principles are binding on all Member States. The Polish Foreign Minister dismissed the allegations and accused the European Commission of misinterpreting Polish law.[90]

The German finance minister, Wolfgang Schäuble, urged the EU members to be united. At the same time, he reaffirmed the need for a determined protection of the external borders by the Eastern European EU countries in order to avoid border controls within the EU.[91] Schäuble and MEP Elmar Brok both stressed the need for the EU to take its own internal and external security into its own hands in order to prevent a further loss of overall stature.[92]

Development Assistance

The Irish singer Bono, a co-founder of ONE, praised the German development policy in Africa. Germany has an understanding of the economic opportunities and of the specific risks present on the continent, Bono explained. He called for a common security and development strategy to provide basic supplies, education and infrastructure for people in Africa. The singer warned of three extremes, which particularly threatened security: "Extreme ideology, extreme poverty and extreme climate." At the same time, Bono advocated making investments contingent on good governance standards.[93]

The Future of the West and NATO

In his introduction to a panel discussion on the future of the West, US Senator McCain appealed to the West: "We must not abandon ourselves and each other, otherwise it would be decadence, and that leads to the failure of world orders," adding also that the 2017 security conference was more important than ever before.[94] McCain warned Western societies not to be paralyzed[95] but to rely on the conviction of their common values and openness.[96] "We may have become self-complacent, we have made mistakes", McCain said, but also stood behind his conviction "as long as courageous people believe in the West, the West will persist". The Senator expressed his appreciation for Germany and Chancellor Merkel for the "essential role", which they play in defending the ideas of the West. According to McCain, not every American may understand the meaning of his praise, but he thanked Germany and Merkel "in the name of all those who do grasp that".[94] During the subsequent discussion, Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko said that supporting Ukraine is the easiest way to strengthen the West.[97] According to Poroshenko, Russia not only wants to redraw Ukraine "in Russian colors" but rather all of Europe. He also warned of a premature détente policy with Moscow, as an end to the sanctions regime would be interpreted as a sign of weakness and further strengthen Russian aggression. Poroshenko appealed to the conference participants: "Do not decide without Ukraine about Ukraine".[95] He told the press that in Ukraine, all of Europe was being defended against Russian aggression” and "that it could affect other countries after Ukraine".[98] All involved parties reiterated their commitment to the Minsk Accord. Representatives of the United States, above all Vice President Mike Pence, criticized Russia's conduct during the conflict. At the same time, it became known during the security conference that Moscow would, effective immediately, recognize passports issued by the separatist so-called Donetsk People's Republic and Luhansk People's Republic, a move that equals diplomatic recognition of these two entities by Russia.[99][100]

In this context, British Foreign Minister Boris Johnson reaffirmed the importance of NATO. He interpreted the Brexit vote as a decision by the United Kingdom in favor of free trade and globalization.[101] He described Trumps election as an opportunity for positive change and asked to give the new US President an opportunity to govern before rushing to judgement.[87]

During an evening event NATO defense ministers from the UK, France, Netherlands, Canada and Turkey discussed the situation of the Western Alliance in the context of the financial dimension of providing for their collective security.[102]

British Defense Secretary, Michael Fallon, pointed to the gap between public commitments to defense spending and actual military expenditure by NATO members. 19 of the 28 Alliance countries contribute less than 1.5% of their GNP, and five members spend even less than 1%. Fallon therefore welcomed Washington's push for binding commitments to document the progress of the individual Alliance partners to reach the 2% target and provide for better burden-sharing in defense matters.[103]

Fallon referred to Russia under President Putin as a reason why NATO should be strengthened. It was Russia, whose cyberattacks and propaganda war was making the world less secure, Fallon continued. "It is Putin, not Trump, who is aggressive. It is Putin and not Trump, who sets up new medium-range missile." French Defense Minister, Jean-Yves Le Drian outlined current changes in the role of NATO. Traditional capabilities such as territorial defense of the Alliance or the concept of "Forward Strategy” were once again gaining in importance. At the same time, Le Drian emphasized that nuclear deterrence was an integral part of ensuring the security of the Alliance. The Dutch defense minister, Jeanine Hennis-Plasschaert, pointed out that Europeans had been able to take a peace dividend over a long period of time, even when the security situation deteriorated.[102] Turkish Minister of Foreign Affairs, Fikri Işık, stressed that not only the eastern but also the southern flank of NATO was increasingly under pressure and called for NATO to be strengthened in the southeast.[103]

China's foreign policy

During the conference, Chinese Foreign Minister, Wang Yi, explained Beijing's position on current issues of foreign and security policy. Wang Yi discussed Chinese policies related to Russia and the US. Observers also interpreted this as an expression of a shift in international power structures, as Europe was only mentioned in the margins.[104] Wang Yi described his country as a pioneer of international cooperation.[105] In the context of North Korea, the Foreign Minister expressed his support for the resumption of the six-party talks in order to resolve the conflict with North Korea[106] and to break the "negative spiral in the nuclear issue". At the same time, Wang Yi announced in Munich, an import stop for coal from North Korea.[107]

Speech by the German Chancellor

Chancellor Angela Merkel during her speech

On the second day of the conference, Chancellor Merkel described the great changes in foreign policy in her speech[108] and called for a new global order pattern, which would have to be developed 25 years after the end of the East-West confrontation.[109] The "world has radically changed, we have no fixed order", Merkel described the situation.[110] At the same time, she promoted a liberal, worldwide multilateralism based on international structures worth fighting for.[111] The Chancellor included amongst others NATO, which has grown in importance due to Russian annexation of the Crimea and the "conflicts in the east of Ukraine, during which Russia supported the separatists". Russia had violated the crucial principle of the territorial integrity of states on which peace and security depended upon, Merkel continued. The Chancellor confirmed that the threats and challenges for the security of the West repeatedly highlighted by the American side were real. Therefore, "we need the military force of the United States of America".[110]

"We will do more for defense policy", Merkel said, supporting the target of spending two percent of GDP on defense in the future following NATO's 2014 agreement to that effect. "We will make every effort, we feel committed to this goal", she said. "Germany knows its responsibility here." In this context, Merkel conceded, however, that it would hardly be possible to increase German defense expenditure by more than 8 percent annually, which would be necessary to achieve that common NATO goal. At the same time, the Chancellor described a concept of security which, in addition to defense,[110] also included development aid and crisis prevention, and which costs would have to be taken into account as well.[112] Merkel stressed the need for fight against the root causes of the refugee crisis. "We Germans, as we have seen in the context of the refugees, always have an interest in ensuring that people elsewhere have a proper and good existence."[110]

On the current state of the EU, the Chancellor expressed herself thoughtfully. According to Merkel, the EU is in a "difficult phase". As a cause, she argued that after the introduction of the euro only later measures to secure it were introduced. Similarly, the principle of freedom of movement of persons had been implemented before measures were taken on the external borders to limit migration.[113]

Speech by the US Vice President

US Vice President Mike Pence during the 53rd MSC

US Vice President Pence reaffirmed the United States' readiness to ensure mutual security guarantees: "The US strongly supports NATO, and will remain steadfast in its commitments to the transatlantic alliance." This statement was received with applause by the conference participants. On the promise to continue to be on the side of Europe, which is linked to "the ideals of freedom, democracy, justice and the rule of law", many participants in the security conference had hoped[108] that the USA would not withdraw, but also continue to shoulder the responsibility in the world, according to Pence's commitment. At the same time, the Vice President confirmed the American view that Europeans had long since ignored the principle of fair burden-sharing and warned: "This undermines the foundations of our alliance."[113] Pence warned the conference participants: "Let me say quite clearly: The President of the United States expects our allies to keep their word and fulfill their commitment. For most, this means that the time has come to do more."[114] The Vice President demanded that NATO increase its contribution to the fight against international terrorism,[113] according to Pence, currently the biggest threat to the West.[115] At the same time, the conflict in Eastern Ukraine has to be stopped. Pence demanded that Moscow abide by the Minsk peace accord for Eastern Ukraine and ensure that the conflict is de-escalated. If this did not happen, the US would hold Russia responsible for its actions. In this context, Pence emphasized the US administration's openness to find new ways of cooperation with Moscow.[116]

António Guterres

UN Secretary General António Guterres during the conference

The former Portuguese Prime Minister and newly elected UN Secretary General called for the strengthening of multilateral structures to address global problems with global responses.[117] Guterres described Germany as a "very solid pillar" for the international order and praised Berlin's commitment to international organizations.[118] At the same time, the UN Secretary General stressed that the UN needs fundamental reforms that would enable the organization to develop simpler and quicker procedures for crisis management and to become more transparent.[119] With blunt words, Guterres described the UN's weaknesses and demanded far-reaching reforms: "We all feel a lack of trust in international organizations. The UN structures are dysfunctional." Guterres also criticized the lack of coordination and as well as the insufficient performance reviews in development cooperation.[120] In the context of a short-term solution to the conflict in Syria, Guterres expressed little optimism.[91] Peace in Syria is only possible if none of the conflicting parties believe in a military success, stated UN Secretary General, and he continued, without a comprehensive solution, a victory over the IS is not possible. Only in this way can the terrorists be deprived of their foundations and can be locally combated.[121]

Jens Stoltenberg, Federica Mogherini and Sigmar Gabriel

NATO Secretary General Stoltenberg urged European NATO members to take on more burdens in the alliance instead of shifting responsibility to the US: "The post-war generation faced this challenge and now we have to do so." In this context, Federica Mogherini, the EU's High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, noted that defense investments are an important prerequisite for security, but that they are not the only one.[115] The "European path" of security policy complements these aspects with questions of education, employment growth and responsible governance, Mogherini added.[93] German Foreign Minister Sigmar Gabriel was skeptical about the 2 percent of GDP on defense spending target. The Europeans should not be pushed by the United States to increase defense investments, Gabriel demanded. The Foreign Minister said, he did not know where the funds would come from within a short time and did not want to "over-interpret" the common goal.[122]

Sergey Lavrov

Russian Foreign Minister, Sergey Lavrov described NATO as an "institution of the Cold War, both in its mind and in its heart".[111] He blamed NATO's expansion for an increase in regional tensions.[123] Lavrov's statements were in contradiction to the statement by Chancellor Merkel, who had spoken of the "sad meaning" which NATO had regained due to the Russian aggression[110] and in response to which NATO's eastern flank had to be strengthened.[124] The Russian Foreign Minister called for a reduction in the global influence of Western countries, as the world could not be ruled in the long run by an "elite club of states". In this context, he spoke of a "post-Western world order",[124] which is characterized by the fact that "each country is defined by its own sovereignty".[111] Lavrov dismissed allegations that his country was trying to manipulate elections in Western countries and called them an "incomprehensible obsession of the West with cybersecurity and cyber espionage". According to Lavrov, no evidence has been found implicating Russia.[125] The Russian Foreign Minister demanded more honesty and called for a "post-fake era" in international relations.[115] At the same time, he promised "pragmatic relations" between the United States and Russia. Lavrov said, a strengthening of the US-Russian relationship would be in the interest of both countries.[124]

Global Health Risks

Microsoft founder Bill Gates during the 53rd MSC

In a panel discussion on global health risks, Microsoft founder Bill Gates warned of new forms of terrorism with biological weapons. Gates said that in a few years, according to epidemiologists, terrorists might be capable of developing genetically modified species of deadly agents on the computer screen.[126] Such highly infectious viruses could spread very quickly and kill more than 30 million people in less than a year, Gates warned, recalling the "Spanish flu", which had claimed up to 50 million victims worldwide in 1918.[127]

According to the Microsoft founder, the world is currently not prepared for such a threat in any way. In addition, the link between health issues and international security is ignored, even though constant biotechnological progress allows the development of new vaccines and medicines which would help to curb epidemics early on. Finally, the measures to protect against pandemics or targeted attacks with biological weapons are largely identical.[128]

Gates reported on the launch of a "Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations". This organization, a public-private partnership, aims to help protect against epidemics by advancing the development of vaccines immediately after a threat is identified.Gates described the need to prepare for crises triggered by epidemics, as well as for military responses in the event of a conflict. This also includes the analysis of existing epidemic risks and the testing of possible aid measures. This is the only way to gain experience on how diseases spread and how people react to such situations. According to Gates, research must be carried out on how to respond to the panic reactions of the general population and the over-congestion of transport or communication systems in order to ensure sufficient medical care at all times. The American philanthropist also highlighted what he regards as the three greatest global dangers: nuclear war, pandemics, and climate change. The world is the least prepared for pandemics, and Gates warned that this was a real problem.[129]

The President of Rwanda, Paul Kagame, pointed to the importance of good governance in this context. Kagame warned that if the government, the authorities, and the people do not trusted each other, essential security mechanisms, such as the health system, would fail in crisis situations such as epidemics.[93]

Fight against Terrorism

German Federal Interior Minister Thomas de Maizière and US Secretary of Homeland Security, John F. Kelly, took part in a panel discussion on combating terrorism. The German Interior Minister spoke out against placing all of Islam under suspicion, but called for a joint fight against Islamic terrorism. De Maiziere objected to demands for a new strategy against terror, but rather demanded the implementation of what had already been decided, including in particular, a better exchange of data. The minister, on the other hand, did not think that an EU-wide intelligence organization would be feasible given the lack of political support for such an entity. At the same time, however, the European terrorist protection group in Den Haag should improve the information exchange between the EU Member States' intelligence services. The newly appointed US Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly spoke also about the "travel ban" issued by the Trump government to citizens from seven Muslim countries. Kelly announced that after a transitional period during which visas and work permits should already be issued, there will be a "better-defined version" of the entry stop. The Pakistani Defense Minister, Khawaja Asif, expressed his critical opinion on America's approach in the discussion and stated that such a travel ban was not helping in the fight against terrorism, but rather promotes Islamophobia, which terrorists will take advantage of.[130]

Middle East and Iran

During a speech on the situation in the Middle East, the Iranian Foreign Minister, Mohammad Javad Zarif, explained his country's assessment of the international situation and the Middle East. He stressed that Iran would respect the nuclear non-proliferation treaty and not acquire or build nuclear weapons. At the same time however, Sarif said, that the agreement made to this point must be respected by all sides, but that this was not currently the case. Iran is not receptive to sanctions, according to the Iranian Foreign Minister, reaffirming his country's official denial on the development of nuclear weapons, calling for the worldwide abolition of nuclear weapons.[131] Israeli Defense Minister Avigdor Liberman in his speech accused Iran of pursuing nuclear ambitions and destabilizing the situation in the Middle East through proxy wars and the associated smuggling of weapons. In the context of the Middle East conflict, Liberman advocated for a two-State solution with the Palestinians.[132] The Turkish Foreign Minister, Çavuşoğlu, also described Iran as a source of turmoil in the region and said that the country wanted to turn Syria and Iraq into Shiite countries. An armistice should be reached with Russia and Iran, demanded Çavuşoğlu, who described the Geneva talks as the basis for a political solution. However, in order to defeat IS, a better strategy and appropriate forces were needed. According to the Turkish Foreign Minister, IS had nothing to do with Islam, which stands for peace. IS is a terrorist organization, like certain Kurdish organizations in Turkey. The minister affirmed that the country has no Kurdish problem, but a terrorism problem with the PKK.[131]

Saudi Foreign Minister, Al-Jubeir, also called Iran a problematic actor in the region, calling it the world's largest terrorist supporter. In this context, Al-Jubeir raised the question of why Shiite Iran had previously been spared from terrorist attacks. Despite this criticism of Tehran's policy, Al-Jubeir expressed his confidence that the various conflicts could be resolved, in Yemen or Syria, if all sides showed willingness to do so in the future. Al-Jubeir also expressed his confidence in cooperation with the new U.S. president, since Trump was a pragmatist and not an ideologue.[131] The UN Special Envoy for Syria, Staffan de Mistura, expressed doubts about the US commitment to Syria. He missed a clear American strategy for Syria, de Mistura deplored. At the same time, he accused the United States of not taking an active part in the search for a political peace process.[133] He called for a political solution for the conflict in Syria.[134]

US foreign policy towards Russia

During the conference, Jane Harman, President of the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, discussed with US Senators Jeanne Shaheen, Lindsey Graham and Christopher Murphy the policies of the Russian Federation under Putin. Democrat Senator Murphy was convinced that Russia had tried to actively influence the 2016 US presidential elections, and demanded that this be examined by Congress and to possibly impose further sanctions. He described a new "Russian expansionism", which could not only be pushed back by an increase in the rate of defense, but at the same time required further measures.

Republican Senator Graham, confirmed the statements of his previous speaker and urged US President Trump to take decisive action against Russia, regardless of the fact that the 2016 election attacks were directed not against his party but the Democrats.[131] He advocated for a cross-party proposal to impose further sanctions against Moscow. The President, he hoped, would agree that he would have to work with Members of Congress as "defenders of the free world". The influential internal Republican party critic of Donald Trump predicated that further attempts of interference would occur, e.g. in French or German election campaigns, if there was no effective response to Moscow's cyber attacks. The Senator at the same time reaffirmed the importance of the media, which he described as indispensable in democratic societies.[135]

Ewald von Kleist Award

During the conference, the outgoing German Federal President, Joachim Gauck, was awarded the Ewald von Kleist Award. Gauck was awarded for his keynote speech at the 50th Security Conference in which he had asked Germany to take on more international responsibility.[136] The prize was presented by the Finnish President, Sauli Niinistö, who described Gauck as an "advocate of civil rights", who had already worked as pastor in the GDR to overcome seemingly insoluble problems. Gauck was not able to accept the prize personally due to illness, and was represented by his Secretary of State, David Gill, who also read the acceptance speech. In his address, the President Gauck urged German society to commit to freedom and to further realize it: "The future is the space of our possibilities - the space of our freedom."[137]

Normandy Group

Foreign Ministers Sigmar Gabriel from Germany, Sergei Lavrov from Russia, Pavlo Klimkin from Ukraine and Jean-Marc Ayrault from France met on the sidelines of the conference to discuss developments in Ukraine as representatives of the Normandy Group.[138] In the months before, implementation of the Minsk Agreements had repeatedly stalled. German Foreign Minister Gabriel expressed his optimism and announced that "all parties will use their influence in order to implement the connections from the Contact Group".[139] The fact that the US did not object to a meeting of the Normandy Group was interpreted by observers as a sign of Washington's support for Germany's role as a mediator in the conflict.[140] The announcement by the Russian government regarding the recognition of ID cards from separatist areas was criticized by the Ukrainian government as a "provocation".[139]

Munich Security Report

The conference organizers published the "Munich Security Report" (MSR) shortly before the launch of the MSC. The publication was titled "Post-Truth, Post-West, Post-Order"? and described a growing uncertainty in world politics, especially after Donald Trump's election as US president.[81] The report, a collaborative effort by the MSC and various think tanks, also highlighted the challenges for international security policies and raised the spectre of an end to the current Western-dominated world order.[141] The MSR also discussed the dangers that "fake news" implies for the culture of debate in Western democracies.[142]

Conference 2016

The 52nd Munich Security Conference took place from 12 to 14 February 2016. 600 international guests attended the event, including 30 heads of state, 70 foreign and defense ministers, directors of various intelligence agencies and 700 journalists from 48 countries.[143] The conferences focused on the conflict between NATO and the Russian Federation, Syria and the fight against IS, Middle East situation, Future of NATO, North Korean nuclear program, Intelligence Services, Ewald von Kleist Award 2016, Situation in Africa as well as Refugee crisis.

Conference 2015

The 51st Munich Security Conference was held from 6 to 8 February 2015. Among the more than 400 international participants[144] from nearly 80 countries were also 20 heads of state, 70 foreign and defense ministers[145] and 30 CEOs of large companies.[146] The conferences focused on the conflict in Ukraine, nuclear negotiations with Iran and the war on terror as well as the global refugees crisis.

Conference 2014

The 50th Munich Security Conference was held from the 31 January to 2 February 2014.[147] The conference focused on the Euromaidan, New security risks, Loss of importance for Europe, NSA-Affair and New order in former Yugoslavia, as well as Middle east, and Iran's nuclear programme.

Conference 2013

The 49th Munich Security Conference was held from the 1 to 3 February 2013.[148] The conference focused on the European debt crisis, transatlantic relations, the crisis regions of Mali and the Middle East, as well as energy security and cyber terrorism.[149]

Other Events

In 2009 two other events were launched and have been conducted annually since then. In 2013, the Cyber Security Summit was created as a fourth conference series. Since 2013 Munich Security Conference and Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung organize an annual Energy Security Summit.

Munich Young Leaders

In 2009, the Munich Young Leaders was first launched in cooperation with the Körber Foundation. Held in parallel to the Security Conference, this annual roundtable series is designed to directly involve the next generation of decision-makers into the main conference proceedings.[1][150] The Roundtable agendas as well as the participants and speakers lists are published online.[151]

Core Group Meetings

In addition to the main conference, a new series of events, the MSC Core Group Meetings, were launched in November 2009 in Washington, DC.[152] The meetings provide a select group of participants the opportunity to discuss key issues of international security policy in order to continue the work of the Security Conference and provide impulses.[153] The location of the Core Group Meetings always varies. The subsequent events took place in Moscow in 2010,[154] Beijing in 2011,[155] as well as Doha in 2013.[156] A second meeting was held for the first time in 2013 in Washington, DC. The location of the 2014 Core Group Meeting was New Delhi. The issues discussed in New Delhi were the threats of terrorism and cyber-attacks, questions of maritime security, regional and global security structures and concepts for new global governance.

The Core Group Meeting 2015 was held in Vienna.[157] The crisis in Ukraine was a central theme of the meeting, which featured the Ukrainian Foreign Minister Pavlo Klimkin and the Russian deputy Foreign Minister Alexei Meshkov. Klimkin urged the European states to confront the Russian government head-on.[158] The Austrian Foreign Minister Sebastian Kurz stated that any border changes in Europe were "unacceptable", but at the same time stressed the need for cooperation with Russia. While the Swiss Foreign Minister Didier Burkhalter proposed a neutral status for Ukraine,[159] the Serbian Foreign Minister Ivica Dačić as OSCE Chairman called for a strengthening of his organization in order to prevent future conflicts.[160]

Another Core Group Meeting took place in Tehran in October 2015. Key topics of the meeting were the implementation of the Vienna Agreement concerning the Iranian nuclear program and the political situation in the region. German Foreign Minister Steinmeier, who opened the conference together with the Iranian Foreign Minister Zarif,[161][162] emphasized the importance of transparency and trust for the successful implementation of the Vienna agreement:[163] "After the game is before the game".[162][164] Regarding the war in Syria, the Iranian Foreign Minister Zarif announced the readiness of his country to cooperate with all governments involved in resolving the conflict.[165]

In April 2016, another MSC Core Group Meeting took place in the Ethiopian capital Addis Ababa. The security situation in Africa, the fight against international terrorism, and the challenges posed by climate change and epidemics were central themes of the meeting.[166] The Ethiopian Foreign Minister Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus stressed the mutual global interdependencies in all of these issues.[167] Other participants included Ethiopian Prime Minister Hailemariam Desalegn, former Nigerian President Olusegun Obasanjo, Smaїl Chergui, African Union Commissioner,[168] former UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan and former German President Horst Köhler.[169]

Another Core Group Meeting was held in Beijing in November 2016.[170] Key topics of the meeting were China's role in the international order, conflicts in the Asia-Pacific region and the geopolitical importance of the "New Silk Road".[171] Deputy Chinese Foreign Minister, Zhang Yesui, stressed in his opening speech the importance of dialogue and cooperation for the security of the region.[172] During the core group meeting, Chinese Vice President Li Yuanchao, reaffirmed his country's willingness to contribute to peace and security globally.[173] Other participants included Fu Ying, chairwoman of the National People's Congress Foreign Affairs Committee, Louise Mushikiwabo, Rwandan Minister of Foreign Affairs, Markus Ederer, secretary of state at the German Foreign Office, Tom Enders, CEO of Airbus Group, and several members of the Bundestag.[174]

Cyber Security Summit

In 2012, the first Cyber Security Summit was held in cooperation with Deutsche Telekom in Bonn.[175][176] The first event was conducted under Chatham House Rule. According to media reports, the supervisory board chairman of Deutsche Bank, Paul Achleitner, the head of the construction group Bilfinger Berger, Roland Koch, as well as Peter Terium, the CEO of the energy supplier RWE and Johannes Teyssen of E.ON were in attendance.[177]

During the summit several working groups analyzed existing cyber risks and dangers for the following industries:

  • Energy
  • Finances
  • Health
  • Logistic
  • Media
  • Production

On November 11, 2013 the second summit took place in Bonn. The gathering had the following four topics:[178]

  1. Rebuilding trust in the digital society
  2. New threat scenarios for the economy
  3. Gaining trust, restoring trust
  4. Cyber defense is becoming a business-critical core skill

Unlike in 2012, the list of speakers was published:

The third summit was held on 3 November 2014.[179] It was attended by 180 representatives from the fields of politics, economy, EU and NATO.[180] In his opening speech, Telekom CEO Höttges highlighted the growing number of attacks on data and digital infrastructures, where the Telekom network recorded 1 Million attacks daily. He quoted a CSIS study that estimated the global damage caused by cybercrime to be US$575 billion per year. To protect European data against access by US authorities, Höttges called for a revision of the Safe Harbor Agreement. The intelligence coordinator of the federal government, Klaus-Dieter Fritsche, supported Höttges demands.[181]

MSC Chairman Ischinger described the great geopolitical importance of cyber security as a result of Ukraine conflict, which had marked the return of war as political means in Europe.[182] State Secretary Brigitte Zypries stated the planned IT Security Act in which the reporting of cyber attacks on companies from sensitive sectors was an obligation as the contribution by the German Federal Government to increase data security.[181] Andy Mueller-Maguhn, a former spokesman for the Chaos Computer Club, stressed the importance of strong encryption for data security and warned of the "back doors", like those that RSA Security installed for the NSA.[182] Elmar Brok, Chairman of the European Parliament Committee on Foreign Affairs, and Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg urged to ward off cyber attacks with offensive actions and stressed the need for a deterrence component.[183][184] Ben Wizner, representative of the American Civil Liberties Union and lawyer of Edward Snowden,[182] contradicted against those needs.[185] In separate working groups, the topics of Digital Defense, Cyber governance, Promotion of Innovation in regards to data security and preventive data protection were also discussed.

The fourth Cyber Security Summit was held on 19 and 20 September 2016 Palo Alto, Silicon Valley.[186] The summit was jointly convened by MSC, Deutsche Telekom and Stanford University. 140 representatives from the fields of politics, security and business participated in the gathering.[187] A central theme of the meeting was the 2016 U.S. presidential election and its possible manipulation by cyber attacks.[188] The chairman of the Munich Security Conference, Wolfgang Ischinger, expressed his fear that such attacks could damage confidence in democratic elections in general.[187]

Further topics were the defense against cyberterrorism, the future of warfare, the economic relevance of cybersecurity and the development of norms and rules for the Internet.[189] MSC chairman Ischinger called for closer coordination between the worlds of politics and technology,[188] in order to create the basis for an open, free and secure web.[190]

In connection with the Internet of Things, Marc Goodman from the American Think Tank Singularity University warned that "everything could be hacked". Goodman predicted the Internet would feature an "epic battle" of different interest groups.[191] Peter R. Neumann from King's College London described the hierarchical structure of law enforcement agencies as an organizational problem in combating cyber-crime, at odds with the de-centralized operating mode of the Internet.[187]

Other participants included Dmitri Alperovitch, co-founder and CTO of CrowdStrike, Michael Chertoff, former United States Department of Homeland Security, chairman and founder of the Chertoff Group, Michael McFaul, director of the Freeman Spogli Institute at Stanford University and former US Ambassador in Russia, and Iddo Moed, Coordinator of Cybersecurity for the Israeli Foreign Ministry,[192] Christopher Painter, Coordinator for Cyber Issues at the US State Department,[193] Latha Reddy, former National Security Adviser of India and currently a member of the Global Commission on Internet Governance,[192] as well as, Uri Rosenthal, former Dutch foreign minister and current Special Envoy of his country for cyber politics.[193]

Energy Security Summit

Together with the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, the MSC has been organizing the Energy Security Summit since 2013.[194] The first meeting was held on 10 July 2013 in the ballroom of the Frankfurt Palmengarten under the auspices of Federal Economics and Technology Minister Philipp Rösler and Environment Minister Peter Altmaier. Other topics of the event were climate change, the geostrategic consequences of fracking and the German Energy transition.[195]

The second Energy Security Summit was held in Berlin on 27 and 28 May 2014. Key topics of the meeting included the "shale gas revolution" in the United States[196] and the conflict in Ukraine. In his speech, Foreign Minister Steinmeier stressed the important role of energy policy for foreign and security policy.[197] Steinmeier pushed for a European Energy Union and urged the EU countries to demonstrate unity with regard to the Ukraine conflict. The minister stressed the need to make compromises in the Russia-Ukraine gas dispute,[198] and warned against too high expectations of substituting American shale gas for Russian gas supplies. EU Energy Commissioner Günther Oettinger also spoke in favor of a European Energy Union with uniform gas prices. He also described Germany's energy policy as being in a "Romantic Valley”. The strategic issue of energy would require Germany to get involved with its technological and political competence, Oettinger stated.[199] During the meeting, Ukrainian Prime Minister Yatsenyuk described the Ukraine conflict as a "global security conflict" which only Russia would be responsible for. Yatsenyuk reiterated his country's refusal to pay a "political price" in exchange for gas supplies from Russia. The premier also expressed the willingness of his country to participate in a common energy policy with the EU.[200]

The third Energy Security Summit was held on 5 and 6 May 2015, again in Berlin.[201] During the meeting, Iranian Oil Minister Bijan Namdar Zangeneh laid out his country's plans for the development of the energy sector after the end of sanctions. After the previously reached deal to resolve the Iranian nuclear crisis, the Minister demanded the rapid lifting of the economic sanctions. He dashed hopes that Tehran would build a gas pipeline to Europe to weaken the dominant role of Russia in the European gas market, citing transit problems and costs.[202] At the same time, the Minister announced that his government would invest US$180 billion in the Iranian oil and gas industry by 2022.[203] Other topics at the meeting included, among others, the proposed Energy Union in Europe, which both Maroš Šefčovič,[204] Vice-President of the European Commission, and Rainer Baake, Parliamentary State Secretary in the Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy, called for,[205] as well as the German energy transition. Bärbel Höhn, chairman of the German Bundestag's Environment Committee, referred to it as an important contribution by Germany to the creation of a global structure of a decentralized energy supply, which reduces dependencies and contributes to security and peace.[206] Criticism came from Greenpeace head Kumi Naidoo, who stated that the high share of brown coal used for electricity generation was the “Achilles heel” of Germany's energy policy.[207] Michael Fuchs, Deputy Chairman of the CDU/CSU parliamentary group, criticized the high burden placed on German citizens due to subsidies of 480 billion Euro earmarked for the energy transition.

See also

References

  1. Tobias Greiff. "Münchner Sicherheitskonferenz" (in German). Historisches Lexikon Bayerns. Retrieved 22 November 2014.
  2. William S. Cohen (28 January 2014). "Little Patience for Frivolous Speeches - A Personal Remembrance of Wehrkunde and Ewald von Kleist". Munich Security Conference. Retrieved 21 February 2014.
  3. Wolfgang Ischinger (13 March 2013). "Die Münchner Sicherheitskonferenz trauert um Ewald-Heinrich von Kleist" (in German). Munich Security Conference. Retrieved 22 November 2014.
  4. Stefan Kornelius (30 January 2014). "Vom Privat-Treffen zum Riesenzirkus" (in German). Süddeutsche Zeitung. Retrieved 22 November 2014.
  5. "Ambassador Wolfgang ISCHINGER". Geneva Centre for Security Policy. Retrieved 22 November 2014.
  6. Kate Connolly (10 February 2003). "I am not convinced, Fischer tells Rumsfeld". The Telegraph. Retrieved 22 November 2014.
  7. "Obama Sends Vice President to Build Bridges". Spiegel.de. Retrieved 2012-12-12.
  8. "Ewald-von-Kleist-Award: MSC". Securityconference.de. Retrieved 2012-12-12.
  9. "MSC Core Group Meeting: MSC". Securityconference.de. 2011-11-21. Retrieved 2012-12-12.
  10. "Egypt, terrorism lead discussion at Munich Security Conference". Dw-world.de. Retrieved 2012-12-12.
  11. "US-Vizepräsident Pence kommt zur Sicherheitskonferenz" (in German). Welt. 8 February 2019. Retrieved 2 February 2020.
  12. "Macron verzichtet auf Treffen mit Merkel". tagesschau.de (in German). 7 February 2019. Retrieved 2 February 2020.
  13. Carla Bleiker (8 February 2019). "Wolfgang Ischinger: 'European Union is alive and kicking'" (in German). Deutsche Welle. Retrieved 2 February 2020.
  14. Christian F. Trippe (11 February 2019). "Münchner Sicherheitskonferenz: Die Welt als Puzzle und Vorstellung" (in German). Deutsche Welle. Retrieved 2 February 2020.
  15. Christian F. Trippe (11 February 2019). ""Irritierender Enthusiasmus": Deutscher Sicherheitsexperte übt harsche Kritik an Trump" (in German). Focus Online. Retrieved 2 February 2020.
  16. Thomas Franke (14 February 2019). "Europa und die Debatte um eine neue Ostpolitik" (in German). Deutschlandfunk. Retrieved 2 February 2020.
  17. "Prominente und viele Probleme" (in German). Bayerischer Rundfunk. 14 February 2019. Retrieved 2 February 2020.
  18. Michael Backfisch (15 February 2019). "Trump schickt Tochter Ivanka zur Sicherheitskonferenz" (in German). Berliner Morgenpost. Retrieved 2 February 2020.
  19. Silvia Stöber (17 February 2019). "Gemeinsam segeln oder untergehen". tagesschau.de (in German). Retrieved 2 February 2020.
  20. Gerwald Herter (16 February 2019). "Warnung vor einer Rüstungsspirale" (in German). Deutschlandfunk. Retrieved 2 February 2020.
  21. "Das Ringen der großen Mächte ist zurück" (in German). Zeit Online. 15 February 2019. Retrieved 2 February 2020.
  22. "Frankreichs Atomwaffen sollen EU schützen" (in German). n-tv. 9 February 2019. Retrieved 2 February 2020.
  23. "Teilnahme von Außenminister Kono an der Münchner Sicherheitskonferenz (Ergebnisse)" (in German). Botschaft von Japan in Deutschland. 17 February 2019. Retrieved 2 February 2020.
  24. "Das waren die wichtigsten Punkte" (in German). ZDF. 17 February 2019. Retrieved 2 February 2020.
  25. "Iran wirft Amerika „pathologische Besessenheit" vor" (in German). Frankfurter Allgemeine. 17 February 2019. Retrieved 2 February 2020.
  26. "Was von der Sicherheitskonferenz 2019 in Erinnerung bleibt" (in German). Handelsblatt. 17 February 2019. Retrieved 2 February 2020.
  27. "Die Münchner Sicherheitskonferenz informiert regelmäßig" (in German). Münchner Sicherheitskonferenz. Retrieved 2 February 2020.
  28. Gudula Hörr (8 February 2019). "Sicherheitskonferenz zelebriert Hochamt für Europa" (in German). n-tv. Retrieved 2 February 2020.
  29. "Auf der Sicherheitskonferenz: Der Tag begann mit einem Lächeln von Ivanka – doch wenig später wurde der Ton rau" (in German). Focus Online. Retrieved 2 February 2020.
  30. "Macron bleibt Münchner Sicherheitskonferenz fern" (in German). heise online. 14 February 2019. Retrieved 2 February 2020.
  31. Ben Knight (17 February 2019). "Klimawandel und Kollaps der Weltordnung" (in German). Deutsche Welle. Retrieved 2 February 2020.
  32. "Macron sagt Teilnahme an Münchner Sicherheitskonferenz ab" (in German). SPIEGEL. 7 February 2019. Retrieved 2 February 2020.
  33. Lorenz Hemicker (8 February 2019). "München im Zentrum der Weltpolitik". deutschland.de (in German). Retrieved 2 February 2020.
  34. "Ivanka Trump kommt zur Münchner Sicherheitskonferenz" (in German). Handelsblatt. 8 February 2019. Retrieved 2 February 2020.
  35. Michael Martens (8 February 2019). "Die Sonnyboys der Sicherheitskonferenz" (in German). Frankfurter Allgemeine. Retrieved 2 February 2020.
  36. Paul-Anton Krüger (15 February 2019). "Freund offener Worte" (in German). Süddeutsche Zeitung. Retrieved 2 February 2020.
  37. "Munich Young Leaders auf der Münchner Sicherheitskonferenz" (in German). Körber Stiftung. 14 February 2019. Retrieved 2 February 2020.
  38. "MSC 2018" (in German). Munich Security Conference. Retrieved 14 January 2019.
  39. Christoph von Marschall (16 February 2018). "EU soll sich bei Sicherheitspolitik nicht hinter den USA verstecken" (in German). Der Tagesspiegel. Retrieved 14 January 2019.
  40. Issio Ehrich (16 February 2018). "GroKo will fleischfressender Vegetarier sein" (in German). n-tv. Retrieved 14 January 2019.
  41. Till Hoppe (16 February 2018). "Die gemeinsame Armee der EU entsteht nur langsam" (in German). Handelsblatt. Retrieved 14 January 2019.
  42. Christian Ultsch (16 February 2018). "Die Welt am Abgrund: „Alarmsignale leuchten dunkelrot"" (in German). Die Presse. Retrieved 14 January 2019.
  43. "Munich Security Report 2018" (in German). Bundesministerium der Verteidigung. 15 February 2018. Retrieved 14 January 2019.
  44. Bärbel Krauß (16 February 2018). "Ischinger: Die Nachkriegsordnung ist bedroht" (in German). STUTTGARTER NACHRICHTEN. Retrieved 14 January 2019.
  45. Ansgar Haase (16 February 2018). "In München ist Trump der Buhmann". t-online.de (in German). Retrieved 14 January 2019.
  46. "Münchner Sicherheitskonferenz: "Es könnte gar nicht schlimmer sein"" (in German). Die Presse. 16 February 2018. Retrieved 14 January 2019.
  47. Michael Stürmer (16 February 2018). "Europa hat Putin nichts entgegenzusetzen" (in German). Welt. Retrieved 14 January 2019.
  48. "Benjamin Netanyahu warns Iran: 'Do not test Israel's resolve'". The Independent. 2018-02-18. Retrieved 2019-10-11.
  49. "Netanyahu got idea for drone stunt from adviser". www.timesofisrael.com. Retrieved 2019-10-11.
  50. "Sicherheitskonferenz im News-Ticker" (in German). Focus Online. Retrieved 14 January 2019.
  51. Witte, Griff; Birnbaum, Michael (18 February 2018). "Brandishing drone fragment, Netanyahu warns that Iran risks conflict". The Washington Post.
  52. "How Netanyahu's Visual Aids Made Him an Unlikely Trendsetter". Haaretz. 2018-02-18. Retrieved 2019-10-11.
  53. "Israel, Iran Trade Barbs At Munich Security Conference". RadioFreeEurope/RadioLiberty. Retrieved 2019-10-11.
  54. Gross, Judah Ari. "Netanyahu: My Iran speech was meant to sway US to renew sanctions". www.timesofisrael.com. Retrieved 2019-10-11.
  55. "Netanyahu got idea for drone stunt from adviser". www.timesofisrael.com. Retrieved 2019-10-11.
  56. Landau, Noa; Levinson, Chaim (2018-03-06). "Netanyahu's Millennials: The Loyal Crew That's Sticking Around Israel's Embattled Leader". Haaretz. Retrieved 2019-10-11.
  57. Monika Ermert (16 February 2018). "UN-Generalsekretär auf der Münchner Sicherheitskonferenz: Internationales Recht für Cyberspace muss geklärt werden" (in German). heise online. Retrieved 14 January 2019.
  58. Matthias Naß (21 February 2018). "Nicht weltpolitikfähig" (in German). Zeit Online. Retrieved 14 January 2019.
  59. Stefan Kornelius (17 February 2018). "Gabriels kluge Worte verpuffen" (in German). Süddeutsche Zeitung. Retrieved 14 January 2019.
  60. Paul-Anton Krüger (17 February 2018). "Die Antwort, die Trump allergrößte Probleme bereiten könnte" (in German). Süddeutsche Zeitung. Retrieved 14 January 2019.
  61. "Sicherheitskonferenz 2018: US-Außenpolitik, Netanjahu und der Nahe Osten" (in German). Heise. Retrieved 14 January 2019.
  62. Peter Mühlbauer (18 February 2018). "Sicherheitskonferenz 2018: US-Außenpolitik, Netanjahu und der Nahe Osten" (in German). TELEPOLIS. Retrieved 14 January 2019.
  63. Michael Thumann (19 February 2018). "Vergessener Krieg im Donbass" (in German). Zeit Online. Retrieved 14 January 2019.
  64. Martin Bernstein (15 February 2018). "500 Teilnehmer, 4000 Polizisten, 16 000 Tassen Kaffee" (in German). Süddeutsche Zeitung. Retrieved 14 January 2019.
  65. Pia Ratzesberger (18 February 2018). "Diese jungen Leute" (in German). Süddeutsche Zeitung. Retrieved 14 January 2019.
  66. Stephanie Munk (19 February 2018). "Siko-Chef zieht düsteres Fazit über die zwei Diskussionstage" (in German). Merkur. Retrieved 14 January 2019.
  67. "EU in einigen Bereichen „falsch abgebogen"" (in German). Welt. 17 February 2018. Retrieved 14 January 2019.
  68. Ekaterina KEl (18 February 2018). "Polens Regierungschef spricht von "jüdischen Tätern" und erzürnt Netanjahu" (in German). Süddeutsche Zeitung. Retrieved 14 January 2019.
  69. "500 Teilnehmer, 4000 Polizisten, 16 000 Tassen Kaffee" (in German). Süddeutsche Zeitung. 16 February 2018. Retrieved 14 January 2019.
  70. Cerstin Gammelin (17 February 2018). "«Jetzt bahnt sich die Wut ihren Weg»" (in German). Tages-Anzeiger. Retrieved 14 January 2019.
  71. Matthias von Hein (17 February 2018). "Dschihadismus nach dem Kalifat" (in German). Deutsche Welle. Retrieved 14 January 2019.
  72. "Konflikte und Wettrüsten im Mittelpunkt" (in German). ORF. 15 February 2018. Retrieved 14 January 2019.
  73. Clemens Wergin (17 February 2018). "Der Westen sieht sich umzingelt von Problemen - und tut nichts" (in German). Welt. Retrieved 14 January 2019.
  74. Martin Knobbe (18 February 2018). "Abschied eines Soldaten" (in German). SPIEGEL ONLINE POLITIK. Retrieved 14 January 2019.
  75. Donata Riedel (18 February 2018). "Afrika – das unterschätzte Risiko für den Weltfrieden" (in German). Handelsblatt. Retrieved 14 January 2019.
  76. ""Unsere Ziele sind noch dieselben"" (in German). SPIEGEL ONLINE POLITIK. 18 February 2018. Retrieved 14 January 2019.
  77. Christian Krügel (18 February 2018). "Tränen auf dem Galadinner" (in German). Süddeutsche Zeitung. Retrieved 14 January 2019.
  78. "Munich did nothing to appease Cold War 2.0 fears". Asia Times. February 20, 2018.
  79. "Germany's Gabriel: 'We need a European moment'". Deutsche Welle. 17 February 2018.
  80. Martin Bernstein (17 February 2017). "Was bei der Siko auf die Polizei zukommt" (in German). Süddeutsche Zeitung. Retrieved 24 January 2018.
  81. Matthias von Hein (17 February 2017). "Acht Fakten zur Münchner Sicherheitskonferenz" (in German). Deutsche Welle. Retrieved 24 January 2018.
  82. Paul Kreiner, Christopher Ziedler (19 February 2017). "Viel Lob für die amerikanische Delegation" (in German). Stuttgarter Zeitung. Retrieved 24 January 2018.
  83. Carsten Luther (17 February 2017). "So kann man nicht zusammenarbeiten" (in German). Zeit Online. Retrieved 24 January 2018.
  84. Lorenz Hemicker (17 February 2017). "Wer ist hier der Boss?" (in German). Frankfurter Allgemeine. Retrieved 24 January 2018.
  85. "Klare Worte zum Auftakt der Sicherheitskonferenz" (in German). Deutsche Welle. 17 February 2017. Retrieved 24 January 2018.
  86. Stefan Kornelius (17 February 2017). "Pence soll der Welt seinen Präsidenten erklären" (in German). Süddeutsche Zeitung. Retrieved 24 January 2018.
  87. Tobias Matern (February 2017). "Trumps Politik bestimmt Münchner Sicherheitskonferenz" (in German). Süddeutsche Zeitung. Retrieved 24 January 2018.
  88. "Von der Leyen warnt US-Regierung vor Alleingängen" (in German). Zeit Online. 17 February 2017. Retrieved 24 January 2018.
  89. Klaus-Dieter Frankenberger (February 2017). "Ein Deal für beide Seiten" (in German). Frankfurter Allgemeine. Retrieved 24 January 2018.
  90. "EU-Kommissionsvize attackiert Polens Außenminister" (in German). Handelsblatt. 17 February 2017. Retrieved 24 January 2018.
  91. "Demo, Trump und Syrien: Hier gibt's den Siko-Ticker zum Nachlesen" (in German). Münchner Merkur. 19 February 2017. Retrieved 24 January 2018.
  92. Christoph von Marschall (February 2017). "Von der Leyen und Mattis harmonieren plötzlich" (in German). Der Tagesspiegel. Retrieved 24 January 2018.
  93. Sabrina Pabst (19 February 2017). "Nur Entwicklung bringt Sicherheit in Afrika" (in German). Deutsche Welle. Retrieved 24 January 2018.
  94. ""Sie dürfen Amerika nicht abschreiben"" (in German). Frankfurter Allgemeine. 17 February 2017. Retrieved 24 January 2018.
  95. "McCain: "Sie dürfen Amerika nicht abschreiben"" (in German). Deutsche Welle. 17 February 2017. Retrieved 24 January 2018.
  96. Mathias Müller von Blumencron (18 February 2017). "Der Westen in Therapie" (in German). Frankfurter Allgemeine. Retrieved 24 January 2018.
  97. Matthias von Hein (17 February 2017). "Selbstvergewisserung einer Allianz" (in German). Deutsche Welle. Retrieved 24 January 2018.
  98. Michaela Rehle (20 February 2017). "Poroschenko fordert Waffenlieferungen an Ukraine" (in German). Reuters. Retrieved 24 January 2018.
  99. Andrew E. Kramer (19 February 2017). "Russia Will Accept Passports Issued by East Ukraine Separatists". The New York Times. Retrieved 24 January 2018.
  100. "Ukraine truce renewed at Munich security conference". Al Jazeera. 18 February 2017. Retrieved 24 January 2018.
  101. Issio Ehrich (18 February 2017). "Endzeitszenarien und Elvis: Sicherheitskonferenz beschwört den Westen" (in German). n-tv. Retrieved 24 January 2018.
  102. "Zahlen für die Nato können wir später" (in German). Der Tagesspiegel. 18 February 2017. Retrieved 24 January 2018.
  103. Stephanie Lecocq (18 February 2017). "Briten wollen von NATO-Partnern Gesetze für höhere Armeebudgets" (in German). Blick. Retrieved 24 January 2018.
  104. Gregor Mayntz (19 February 2017). "Was nun, Westen?" (in German). Rheinische Post Online. Retrieved 26 January 2018.
  105. Paul Kreiner, Christopher Ziedler (19 February 2017). "Amerika ohne Telefonnummer" (in German). Stuttgarter Zeitung. Retrieved 26 January 2018.
  106. Kai Strittmatter (February 2017). "Kims Kohle ist unerwünscht. China verhängt einen Importstopp gegen Nordkorea" (in German). Tages-Anzeiger. Retrieved 26 January 2018.
  107. Christian Mihatsch (20 February 2017). "China stoppt Kohleimporte aus Nordkorea" (in German). Klimaretter. Retrieved 26 January 2018.
  108. Lorenz Hemicker (18 February 2017). "Der Trump-Übersetzer" (in German). Frankfurter Allgemeine. Retrieved 26 January 2018.
  109. Tobias Matern (18 February 2017). "Trump, der unsichtbare Elefant" (in German). Süddeutsche Zeitung. Retrieved 26 January 2018.
  110. Carsten Luther (18 February 2017). "Zwei Ideen von Stärke" (in German). Zeit Online. Retrieved 26 January 2018.
  111. "Russland wirbt für "post-westliche Weltordnung"" (in German). Deutsche Welle. 18 February 2017. Retrieved 26 January 2018.
  112. "Merkel warnt vor "kleinlicher Diskussion" um Militärausgaben" (in German). Spiegel Online. 18 February 2017. Retrieved 26 January 2018.
  113. Eric Gujer (18 February 2017). "Trump steht fest zu Europa" (in German). Neue Zürcher Zeitung. Retrieved 26 January 2018.
  114. Markus Becker (18 February 2017). "Münchner Unsicherheitskonferenz" (in German). Spiegel Online. Retrieved 26 January 2018.
  115. Lewis Sanders (18 February 2017). "Vom Verteidigungsetat zum Terrorismus: Wechselnde Themen bei der MSC2017" (in German). Deutsche Welle. Retrieved 26 January 2018.
  116. "Lawrow: Nato ist "Institution des Kalten Krieges"" (in German). Frankfurter Allgemeine. 18 February 2017. Retrieved 26 January 2018.
  117. "Merkel und Guterres betonen Bedeutung der UN" (in German). Deutsche Welle. 17 February 2017. Retrieved 26 January 2018.
  118. "Merkel und UN-Generalsekretär pochen auf multilaterale Lösungen" (in German). Handelsblatt. 17 February 2017. Retrieved 26 January 2018.
  119. "UNO-Generalsekretär Guterres: UNO braucht Reform" (in German). Kurier. 18 February 2017. Retrieved 26 January 2018.
  120. "António Guterres bei der Münchner Sicherheitskonferenz: "Der syrische Konflikt ist zu einer schrecklichen Bedrohung für viele Länder geworden"" (in German). Regionales Informationszentrum der Vereinten Nationen für Westeuropa (UNRIC). Archived from the original on 4 September 2017. Retrieved 26 January 2018.
  121. Holger Romann (19 February 2017). "Dicke Brocken zum Schluss" (in German). ARD. Retrieved 26 January 2018.
  122. "Gabriel warnt vor "Aufrüstungsspirale"" (in German). Frankfurter Allgemeine. 18 February 2017. Retrieved 26 January 2018.
  123. "Russland außen vor" (in German). Heise. Retrieved 26 January 2018.
  124. Frank Nienhuysen (19 February 2017). "Von wegen frische Verbundenheit" (in German). Süddeutsche Zeitung. Retrieved 26 January 2018.
  125. "Amerikanischer Senator will Russland "Arschtritt" geben" (in German). Frankfurter Allgemeine. 19 February 2017. Retrieved 26 January 2018.
  126. Adelheid Müller-Lissner, Rainer Woratschka (25 February 2017). "Warum Deutschland Pandemien bekämpfen will" (in German). Der Tagesspiegel. Retrieved 28 January 2018.
  127. "Bill Gates auf der Münchner Sicherheitskonferenz" (in German). The-Wall-Street. 19 February 2017. Retrieved 28 January 2018.
  128. Bill Gates (18 February 2017). "Bill Gates: Eine neue Art des Terrors könnte 30 Millionen Menschen umbringen — und wir sind nicht vorbereitet" (in German). Business Insider Deutschland. Retrieved 28 January 2018.
  129. Klaus Remme (21 February 2017). ""Auf eine Pandemie sind wir am wenigsten vorbereitet"" (in German). Deutschlandfunk. Retrieved 28 January 2018.
  130. Gregor Mayntz (18 February 2017). "Neues Einreisedekret? Europa warnt USA vor falschen Signalen" (in German). Rheinische Post Online. Retrieved 28 January 2018.
  131. "Münchner SicherheitskonferenzUS-Politiker will "Russland in den Hintern treten"" (in German). Focus Online. Retrieved 28 January 2018.
  132. Jochen Stahnke (19 February 2017). "Ein Staat, zwei Staaten, drei Fragezeichen" (in German). Frankfurter Allgemeine. Retrieved 28 January 2018.
  133. "Syrien-Gesandter Staffan de Mistura: "Wo sind die USA?"" (in German). Deutsche Welle. 19 February 2017. Retrieved 28 January 2018.
  134. "De Mistura wirbt für politische Lösung des Syrienkonflikts" (in German). Deutschlandfunk. 19 February 2017. Retrieved 28 January 2018.
  135. "US-Senator Graham: Werden Russland in den "Arsch" treten" (in German). Deutsche Welle. 19 February 2017. Retrieved 28 January 2018.
  136. "Eröffnung der 50. Münchner Sicherheitskonferenz" (in German). Der Bundespräsident. 31 January 2014. Retrieved 28 January 2018.
  137. Christoph von Marschall (18 February 2017). "Joachim Gauck mit Ewald-von-Kleist-Preis ausgezeichnet" (in German). Der Tagesspiegel. Retrieved 28 January 2018.
  138. "Gabriel: Bemühungen um Waffenstillstand ab Montag" (in German). Frankfurter Allgemeine. 18 February 2017. Retrieved 28 January 2018.
  139. "Russland und Ukraine unterstützen Waffenruhe" (in German). Deutsche Welle. 18 February 2017. Retrieved 28 January 2018.
  140. Majid Sattar (17 February 2017). "Gabriels militärische Kalkulationen" (in German). Frankfurter Allgemeine. Retrieved 28 January 2018.
  141. Lewis Sanders (13 February 2017). "Münchner Sicherheitskonferenz: Steht eine neue Weltordnung bevor?" (in German). Deutsche Welle. Retrieved 28 January 2018.
  142. Anne-Sophie Galli (17 February 2017). "Fünf Antworten zur Münchner Sicherheitskonferenz" (in German). Neue Zürcher Zeitung. Retrieved 28 January 2018.
  143. Matthias von Hein (11 February 2016). "Die Münchner Sicherheitskonferenz in Zahlen" (in German). Deutsche Welle. Retrieved 9 November 2016.
  144. Tang Zhiqiang, He Mengshu (9 February 2015). "Spotlight: Munich meeting ends with Europe-U.S. clash over Ukraine". Xinhua. Retrieved 6 July 2015.
  145. Dietmar Neuerer (6 February 2015). "Düstere Aussichten für die Weltkrisenlöser" (in German). Handelsblatt. Retrieved 6 July 2015.
  146. Christoph Herwartz (6 February 2015). "Münchner Sicherheitskonferenz: Wie nutzt Merkel ihre große Bühne?" (in German). n-tv. Retrieved 6 July 2015.
  147. "Foreign Minister Erkki Tuomioja to attend the Munich Security Conference". Embassy of Finland, London. 30 January 2014. Retrieved 13 January 2015.
  148. "1-3 February: The World looks towards Munich at Munich Security Conference 2013". European Union External Action. 1 February 2013. Archived from the original on 25 June 2016. Retrieved 18 May 2020.
  149. "Hintergrund: Themen und Teilnehmer der 49. Münchner Sicherheitskonferenz" (in German). ZEIT ONLINE. 1 February 2013. Retrieved 18 May 2020.
  150. "Munich Young Leaders 2009". Körber-Stiftug. Archived from the original on 12 August 2016. Retrieved 28 June 2016.
  151. "Munich Young Leaders 2016". Körber-Stiftung. Archived from the original on 12 August 2016. Retrieved 28 June 2016.
  152. "Under Secretary Robert Hormats Addresses Washington Security Conference". U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE. 2009. Archived from the original on 21 August 2016. Retrieved 28 June 2016.
  153. "MSC Core Group Meeting in Washington, D.C. (2009)" (in German). Munich Security Conference. 2009. Retrieved 28 June 2016.
  154. "Rede von Staatsminister Werner Hoyer bei der Münchner Sicherheitskonferenz (MCG Core Group Meeting) in Moskau (19.-20.10.2010)". Auswärtiges Amt. 20 October 2010. Retrieved 28 June 2016.
  155. Zhang Yue (22 November 2011). "Münchner Sicherheitskonferenz sucht nach Dialog und Vertrauen mit China" (in German). China Internet Information Center. Retrieved 28 June 2016.
  156. "Munich security conference to focus on Gulf challenges". Gulf Times. 18 May 2013. Retrieved 28 June 2016.
  157. "Sicherheitskonferenz: Neue Friedensordnung in Wien gesucht" (in German). Der Standard. 2 June 2015. Retrieved 28 June 2016.
  158. Christoph Prantner, Manuel Escher (16 June 2015). "Sicherheitskonferenz: Debatte über Rüstzeug für Krieg und Frieden" (in German). Der Standard. Retrieved 28 June 2016.
  159. "Neutralitätsstatus für die Ukraine" (in German). Neue Zürcher Zeitung. 18 July 2015. Retrieved 28 June 2016.
  160. "Eine vereinte, demokratische und europäische Ukraine?" (in German). Munich Secrutiy Conference. 17 June 2015. Retrieved 28 June 2016.
  161. "Steinmeier visits Tehran". Federal Foreign Office. 20 October 2015. Retrieved 9 January 2017.
  162. Daniel Friedrich Sturm (18 October 2015). "Wenn Berg und Berg nicht zusammenkommen" (in German). Welt. Retrieved 9 January 2017.
  163. Majid Sattar (18 October 2015). "Nach der Krise ist vor der Krise" (in German). Frankfurter Allgemeine. Retrieved 9 January 2017.
  164. "Speech by Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier at the Munich Security Conference Core Group Meeting in Tehran". Federal Foreign Office. 17 October 2015. Retrieved 9 January 2017.
  165. "Iran won't allow Saudi Arabia to exclude Iran from regional equations: Zarif". PressTV. 17 October 2015. Retrieved 9 January 2017.
  166. Ludger Schadomskys (18 April 2016). "Gemeinsam gegen Terror und Gewalt: Die Münchner Sicherheitskonferenz in Afrika" (in German). Deutsche Welle. Retrieved 13 January 2017.
  167. "The Munich Security Conference kicks-off: "The First of its kind in Africa"". Embassy of the Ethiopia, Berlin. 15 April 2016. Retrieved 13 January 2017.
  168. "Munch Security Conference underway in Addis". Ethiopian Broadcasting Corporation. 15 April 2016. Archived from the original on 13 October 2016. Retrieved 13 January 2017.
  169. Ludger Schadomsky (13 April 2016). "Ischinger: "Sicherheit in und für Afrika ganz oben auf der Tagesordnung"" (in German). Deutsche Welle. Retrieved 13 January 2017.
  170. "How to make people think? MSC Core Group Meeting in Beijing discusses China's international role". Mercator Institute for China Studies. Retrieved 13 January 2017.
  171. "Vietnam, China beef up defence ties". Vietnam News Agency. 3 November 2016. Retrieved 13 January 2017.
  172. "Vice Foreign Minister Zhang Yesui Attends Opening Ceremony of Core Group Meeting of Munich Security Conference and Delivers a Speech". Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People's Republic of China. 3 November 2016. Retrieved 13 January 2017.
  173. "Chinas stellvertretender Staatspräsident trifft MSC-Vertreter" (in German). China Internet Information Center. 4 November 2017. Retrieved 13 January 2017.
  174. ""We cannot harm the security of other countries in pursuit of our own"". Munich Security Conference. 2 November 2016. Retrieved 13 January 2017.
  175. Achim Sawall (13 September 2012). "Kongress der Telekom ruft nach Cyber-Wehr". golem.de (in German). Retrieved 6 August 2016.
  176. "Erster Cyber Security Summit 2012 in Bonn" (in German). Deutsche Telekom. Archived from the original on 19 August 2016. Retrieved 6 August 2016.
  177. Achim Sawall (23 July 2012). "Telekom startet geheimnisvolle Cyberwar-Konferenz". golem.de (in German). Retrieved 6 August 2016.
  178. "Summit 2013: Vier Themen im Fokus" (in German). Deutsche Telekom. Archived from the original on 19 August 2016. Retrieved 6 August 2016.
  179. "Kontinuität für mehr Cyber-Sicherheit" (in German). Deutsche Telekom. Archived from the original on 21 August 2016. Retrieved 6 August 2016.
  180. "Täglich eine Million Attacken" (in German). taz. 3 November 2014. Retrieved 6 August 2016.
  181. "Eine Million Attacken pro Tag: Telekom fürchtet immer mehr Cyber-Angriffe" (in German). n-tv. 3 November 2014. Retrieved 6 August 2016.
  182. Matthias von Hein (4 November 2014). "Cyber Security: Die Chefs und das Netz" (in German). Deutsche Welle. Retrieved 6 August 2016.
  183. Torsten Kleinz (3 November 2014). "Cyber Security Summit: "Der Krieg ist nach Europa zurückgekehrt"" (in German). heise online. Retrieved 6 August 2016.
  184. Jan Boris Wintzenburg (3 November 2014). "Abschreckung ist unverzichtbar" (in German). Stern. Retrieved 6 August 2016.
  185. "Guttenberg hält Genfer Konventionen für veraltet" (in German). ZEIT ONLINE. 4 November 2014. Retrieved 6 August 2016.
  186. "4. Cyber Security Summit". Deutsche Telekom. Archived from the original on 18 August 2016. Retrieved 6 August 2016.
  187. Britta Weddeling (21 September 2016). "Gegen die Bedrohung aus dem Internet" (in German). Handelsblatt. Retrieved 19 May 2017.
  188. Christiane Hübscher (20 September 2016). "Angst in den USA: Hacken der Präsidentschaftswahl". Silicon Valley Stories (in German). ZDF heute.de. Retrieved 19 May 2017.
  189. "MSC und Deutsche Telekom: Cyber Security Summit im Silicon Valley" (in German). Deutsche Telekom. 22 September 2016. Retrieved 19 May 2017.
  190. Jörg Fleischer (26 September 2016). "Cyber Security Summit: Experten tagen im Sikicon Valley" (PDF) (in German). Bundeswehr. Archived from the original (PDF) on 14 March 2017. Retrieved 19 May 2017.
  191. ""Epische Schlacht" um das Internet" (in German). Computerwoche. 22 September 2016. Retrieved 19 May 2017.
  192. "Cyber Security Summit im Silicon Valley" (in German). Digitale Generation. 14 September 2016. Archived from the original on 14 March 2017. Retrieved 19 May 2017.
  193. Tony Bricktua (21 September 2016). "EWI Examines Global Norms in Cyberspace at 4th Cyber Security Summit". eastwest.ngo (in German). Retrieved 19 May 2017.
  194. "Energy Security". Munich Security Conference. Retrieved 20 August 2016.
  195. Tobias Bunde, Oliver Rolofs (July 2013). "Energy Security Summit 2013: "How to Feed and Secure the Global Demand?"". Munich Security Conference. Retrieved 20 August 2016.
  196. "Energy Security Summit 2014: The Next Great Game? Global Impacts of the Shale Revolution" (PDF) (in German). Frankfurter Allgemeine Forum. Retrieved 20 August 2016.
  197. Frank-Walter Steinmeier (28 May 2014). "Rede von Außenminister Frank-Walter Steinmeier beim Second Energy Security Summit der Münchner Sicherheitskonferenz: "The Next Great Game? Global Impacts of the Shale Revolution"" (in German). Auswärtiges Amt. Retrieved 20 August 2016.
  198. Julian Staib (28 May 2014). "Steinmeier ruft Europa zu Geschlossenheit auf" (in German). Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung. Retrieved 20 August 2016.
  199. Julian Staib (28 May 2014). "Oettinger weist Forderungen Kiews zurück" (in German). Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung. Retrieved 20 August 2016.
  200. Julian Staib (28 May 2014). "Für Poroschenko herrscht im Osten des Landes Krieg" (in German). Franbkfurter Allgemeine Zeitung. Retrieved 20 August 2016.
  201. "Annual Energy Security Summit to Kick Off in Berlin" (in German). Sputnik. 6 May 2015. Retrieved 20 August 2016.
  202. Andreas Mihm (8 May 2015). "Deutsche Klimapolitik ist keine Blaupause für andere" (in German). Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung. Retrieved 20 August 2016.
  203. "Iran to launch 3 new petrochemical plants before year-end: Official". PressTV. 24 May 2015. Retrieved 20 August 2016.
  204. Stephan Kohler (19 May 2015). "Die Europäisierung der Energiepolitik – ein Lippenbekenntnis" (in German). Der Hauptstadtbrief. Retrieved 20 August 2016.
  205. "Eu Energy Union Poses Long-Term Threat to Russia – German Official". Sputnik. 7 May 2015. Retrieved 20 August 2016.
  206. Sonya Angelica Diehn (12 May 2015). "Germany: Leader in a global energy transition?". Deutsche Welle. Retrieved 20 August 2016.
  207. Sonya Angelica Diehn (8 May 2015). "Naidoo: 'Coal is Germany's Achilles heel'". Deutsche Welle. Retrieved 20 August 2016.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.