Intersectionality

Intersectionality is a theoretical framework for understanding how aspects of a person's social and political identities (e.g., gender, race, class, sexuality, ability, physical appearance,[1][2] height,[3] etc.) might combine to create unique modes of discrimination and privilege. Intersectionality identifies advantages and disadvantages that are felt by people due to a combination of factors. For example, a black woman might face discrimination from a business that is not distinctly due to her race (because the business does not discriminate against black men) nor distinctly due to her gender (because the business does not discriminate against white women), but due to a unique combination of the two factors.

An intersectional analysis considers all the factors that apply to an individual in combination, rather than considering each factor in isolation.
Part of a series on
Discrimination
Specific forms
 

Intersectionality broadens the lens of the first waves of feminism, which largely focused on the experiences of women who were both white and middle-class, to include the different experiences of women of color, women who are poor, immigrant women, and other groups. Intersectional feminism aims to separate itself from white feminism by acknowledging women's different experiences and identities.[4]

Intersectionality is a qualitative analytic framework developed in the late 20th century that identifies how interlocking systems of power affect those who are most marginalized in society[5] and takes these relationships into account when working to promote social and political equity.[4] Intersectionality opposes analytical systems that treat each oppressive factor in isolation, as if the discrimination against black women could be explained away as only a simple sum of the discrimination against black men and the discrimination against white women.[6] Intersectionality engages in similar themes as triple oppression, which is the oppression associated with being a poor woman of color.

Intersectionality has been critiqued as being inherently ambiguous. The ambiguity of this theory means that it can be perceived as unorganized and lacking a clear set of defining goals; this arguably means that intersectionality will be unlikely to achieve equality due to its unfocused agenda. Without a clear focus, it is difficult for a movement to create change because having such a broad theory makes it harder for people to fully understand its goals. As it is based in standpoint theory, critics say the focus on subjective experiences can lead to contradictions and the inability to identify common causes of oppression.

Historical background
External video
Women of the World Festival 2016
Kimberlé Crenshaw – On Intersectionality via Southbank Centre on YouTube[7]

The term was coined by black feminist scholar Kimberlé Williams Crenshaw in 1989.[8][9][10] While the theory began as an exploration of the oppression of women of color within society, today the analysis has expanded to include many more aspects of social identity. Identities most commonly referenced in the fourth wave of feminism include race, gender, sex, sexuality, class, ability, nationality, citizenship, religion and body type. Despite being coined in 1989, the term Intersectionality was not adopted widely by feminists until the 2000s and has only grown since that time.

As articulated by author bell hooks, the emergence of intersectionality "challenged the notion that 'gender' was the primary factor determining a woman's fate".[11] The historical exclusion of black women from the feminist movement in the United States resulted in many black 19th and 20th century feminists, such as Anna Julia Cooper, challenging their historical exclusion. This disputed the ideas of earlier feminist movements, which were primarily led by white middle-class women, suggesting that women were a homogeneous category who shared the same life experiences.[12] However, once established that the forms of oppression experienced by white middle-class women were different from those experienced by black, poor, or disabled women, feminists began seeking ways to understand how gender, race, and class combine to "determine the female destiny".[11]

The concept of intersectionality is intended to illuminate dynamics that have often been overlooked by feminist theory and movements.[13] Racial inequality was a factor that was largely ignored by first-wave feminism, which was primarily concerned with gaining political equality between white men and white women. Early women's rights movements often exclusively pertained to the membership, concerns, and struggles of white women.[14] Second-wave feminism stemmed from Betty Friedan’s The Feminine Mystique and worked to dismantle sexism relating to the perceived domestic purpose of women. While feminists during this time achieved success through the Equal Pay Act of 1963, Title IX, and Roe v. Wade, they largely alienated black women from platforms in the mainstream movement.[15] However, third-wave feminism—which emerged shortly after the term "intersectionality" was coined in the late 1980s—noted the lack of attention to race, class, sexual orientation, and gender identity in early feminist movements, and tried to provide a channel to address political and social disparities.[16] Intersectionality recognizes these issues which were ignored by early social justice movements. Many recent academics, such as Leslie McCall, have argued that the introduction of the intersectionality theory was vital to sociology and that before the development of the theory, there was little research that specifically addressed the experiences of people who are subjected to multiple forms of oppression within society.[17] An example of this idea was championed by Iris Marion Young, arguing that differences must be acknowledged in order to find unifying social justice issues that create coalitions that aid in changing society for the better.[18] More specifically, this relates to the ideals of the National Council of Negro Women (NCNW).[19]

The term also has historical and theoretical links to the concept of "simultaneity", which was advanced during the 1970s by members of the Combahee River Collective in Boston, Massachusetts.[20] Simultaneity is explained as the simultaneous influences of race, class, gender, and sexuality, which informed the member's lives and their resistance to oppression.[21] Thus, the women of the Combahee River Collective advanced an understanding of African-American experiences that challenged analyses emerging from Black and male-centered social movements, as well as those from mainstream cisgender, white, middle-class, heterosexual feminists.[22]

Since the term was coined, many feminist scholars have emerged with historical support for the intersectional theory. These women include Beverly Guy-Sheftall and her fellow contributors to Words of Fire: An Anthology of African-American Feminist Thought, a collection of articles describing the multiple oppressions black women in America have experienced from the 1830s to contemporary times. Guy-Sheftall speaks about the constant premises that influence the lives of African-American women, saying, "Black women experience a special kind of oppression and suffering in this country which is racist, sexist, and classist because of their dual race and gender identity and their limited access to economic resources."[23] Other writers and theorists were using intersectional analysis in their work before the term was coined. For example, Deborah K. King published the article "Multiple Jeopardy, Multiple Consciousness: The Context of a Black Feminist Ideology" in 1988, just before Crenshaw coined the term intersectionality. In the article King addresses what soon became the foundation for intersectionality, saying, "Black women have long recognized the special circumstances of our lives in the United States: the commonalities that we share with all women, as well as the bonds that connect us to the men of our race."[24] Additionally, Gloria Wekker describes how Gloria Anzaldúa's work as a Chicana feminist theorist exemplifies how "existent categories for identity are strikingly not dealt with in separate or mutually exclusive terms, but are always referred to in relation to one another".[25] Wekker also points to the words and activism of Sojourner Truth as an example of an intersectional approach to social justice.[25] In her speech, "Ain’t I a Woman?", Truth identifies the difference between the oppression of white and black women. She says that white women are often treated as emotional and delicate while black women are subjected to racist abuse. However, this was largely dismissed by white feminists who worried that this would distract from their goal of women's suffrage and instead focused their attention on emancipation.[26]

Feminist thought
Part of a series on
Feminism
Feminism portal

In 1989, Kimberlé Crenshaw coined the term "intersectionality" in a paper as a way to help explain the oppression of African-American women. Crenshaw's term is now at the forefront of national conversations about racial justice, identity politics, and policing—and over the years has helped shape legal discussions.[8][9][10] She used the term in her crucial 1989 paper for the University of Chicago Legal Forum, "Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Anti-discrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics".[27][28] In her work, Crenshaw discusses Black feminism, arguing that the experience of being a black woman cannot be understood in independent terms of either being black or a woman. Rather, it must include interactions between the two identities, which, she adds, should frequently reinforce one another.[29]

In order to show that non-white women have a vastly different experience from white women due to their race and/or class and that their experiences are not easily voiced or amplified, Crenshaw explores two types of male violence against women: domestic violence and rape. Through her analysis of these two forms of male violence against women, Crenshaw says that the experiences of non-white women consist of a combination of both racism and sexism.[30] She says that because non-white women are present within discourses that have been designed to address either race or sex—but not both at the same time—non-white women are marginalized within both of these systems of oppression as a result.[30]

In her work, Crenshaw identifies three aspects of intersectionality that affect the visibility of non-white women: structural intersectionality, political intersectionality, and representational intersectionality. Structural intersectionality deals with how non-white women experience domestic violence and rape in a manner qualitatively different than that of white women. Political intersectionality examines how laws and policies intended to increase equality have paradoxically decreased the visibility of violence against non-white women. Finally, representational intersectionality delves into how pop culture portrayals of non-white women can obscure their own authentic lived experiences.[30]

The term gained prominence in the 1990s, particularly in the wake of the further development of Crenshaw's work in the writings of sociologist Patricia Hill Collins. Crenshaw's term, Collins says, replaced her own previous coinage "black feminist thought", and "increased the general applicability of her theory from African American women to all women".[31]:61 Much like Crenshaw, Collins argues that cultural patterns of oppression are not only interrelated, but are bound together and influenced by the intersectional systems of society, such as race, gender, class, and ethnicity.[32]:42 Collins describes this as "interlocking social institutions [that] have relied on multiple forms of segregation... to produce unjust results".[33]

Collins sought to create frameworks to think about intersectionality, rather than expanding on the theory itself. She identified three main branches of study within intersectionality. One branch deals with the background, ideas, issues, conflicts, and debates within intersectionality. Another branch seeks to apply intersectionality as an analytical strategy to various social institutions in order to examine how they might perpetuate social inequality. The final branch formulates intersectionality as a critical praxis to determine how social justice initiatives can use intersectionality to bring about social change.[34]

The ideas behind intersectional feminism existed long before the term was coined. Sojourner Truth's 1851 "Ain't I a Woman?" speech, for example, exemplifies intersectionality, in which she spoke from her racialized position as a former slave to critique essentialist notions of femininity.[35] Similarly, in her 1892 essay, "The Colored Woman's Office", Anna Julia Cooper identifies black women as the most important actors in social change movements, because of their experience with multiple facets of oppression.[36]

A key writer who focused on intersectionality was Audre Lorde, who was a self-proclaimed "Black, Lesbian, Mother, Warrior, Poet".[37] Even in the title she gave herself, Lorde expressed her multifaceted personhood and demonstrated her intersectional struggles with being a black, gay woman. Lorde commented in her essay "The master’s tools will never dismantle the master’s house" that she was living in "a country where racism, sexism, and homophobia are inseparable".[38] Here, Lorde perfectly outlines the importance of intersectionality as she acknowledges that different prejudices are inherently linked.

Though intersectionality began with the exploration of the interplay between gender and race, over time other identities and oppressions were added to the theory. For example, in 1981 Cherríe Moraga and Gloria Anzaldúa published the first edition of This Bridge Called My Back. This anthology explored how classifications of sexual orientation and class also mix with those of race and gender to create even more distinct political categories. Many black, Latina, and Asian writers featured in the collection stress how their sexuality interacts with their race and gender to inform their perspectives. Similarly, poor women of color detail how their socio-economic status adds a layer of nuance to their identities, ignored or misunderstood by middle-class white feminists.[39]

According to black feminists and many white feminists, experiences of class, gender, and sexuality cannot be adequately understood unless the influence of racialization is carefully considered. This focus on racialization was highlighted many times by scholar and feminist bell hooks, specifically in her 1981 book Ain't I A Woman: Black Women and Feminism.[40] Feminists argue that an understanding of intersectionality is a vital element of gaining political and social equality and improving our democratic system.[41] Collins's theory represents the sociological crossroads between modern and post-modern feminist thought.[32]

Marie-Claire Belleau argues for "strategic intersectionality" in order to foster cooperation between feminisms of different ethnicities.[42]:51 She refers to different nat-cult (national-cultural) groups that produce unique types of feminisms. Using Québécois nat-cult as an example, Belleau says that many nat-cult groups contain infinite sub-identities within themselves, arguing that there are endless ways in which different feminisms can cooperate by using strategic intersectionality, and that these partnerships can help bridge gaps between "dominant and marginal" groups.[42]:54 Belleau argues that, through strategic intersectionality, differences between nat-cult feminisms are neither essentialist nor universal, but should be understood as resulting from socio-cultural contexts. Furthermore, the performances of these nat-cult feminisms are also not essentialist. Instead, they are strategies.[42]

Similarly, Intersectional theorists like Vrushali Patil argue that intersectionality ought to recognize transborder constructions of racial and cultural hierarchies. About the effect of the state on identity formation, Patil says: "If we continue to neglect cross-border dynamics and fail to problematize the nation and its emergence via transnational processes, our analyses will remain tethered to the spatialities and temporalities of colonial modernity."[43]

Marxist feminist critical theory
Part of a series on
Marxism
  • Outline
  • Communism portal
  • Philosophy portal
  • Socialism portal

W. E. B. Du Bois theorized that the intersectional paradigms of race, class, and nation might explain certain aspects of the black political economy. Collins writes: "Du Bois saw race, class, and nation not primarily as personal identity categories but as social hierarchies that shaped African-American access to status, poverty, and power."[32]:44 Du Bois omitted gender from his theory and considered it more of a personal identity category.

Cheryl Townsend Gilkes expands on this by pointing out the value of centering on the experiences of black women. Joy James takes things one step further by "using paradigms of intersectionality in interpreting social phenomena". Collins later integrated these three views by examining a black political economy through the centering of black women's experiences and the use of a theoretical framework of intersectionality.[32]:44

Collins uses a Marxist feminist approach and applies her intersectional principles to what she calls the "work/family nexus and black women's poverty". In her 2000 article "Black Political Economy" she describes how, in her view, the intersections of consumer racism, gender hierarchies, and disadvantages in the labor market can be centered on black women's unique experiences. Considering this from a historical perspective and examining interracial marriage laws and property inheritance laws creates what Collins terms a "distinctive work/family nexus that in turn influences the overall patterns of black political economy".[32]:45–46 For example, anti-miscegenation laws effectively suppressed the upward economic mobility of black women.

The intersectionality of race and gender has been shown to have a visible impact on the labor market. "Sociological research clearly shows that accounting for education, experience, and skill does not fully explain significant differences in labor market outcomes."[44]:506 The three main domains in which we see the impact of intersectionality are wages, discrimination, and domestic labor. Those who experience privilege within the social hierarchy in terms of race, gender and socio-economic status are less likely to receive lower wages, to be subjected to stereotypes and discriminated against, or to be hired for exploitative domestic positions. Studies of the labor market and intersectionality provide a better understanding of economic inequalities and the implications of the multidimensional impact of race and gender on social status within society.[44]:506–507

Key concepts

Interlocking matrix of oppression

Collins refers to the various intersections of social inequality as the matrix of domination. These are also known as "vectors of oppression and privilege".[45]:204 These terms refer to how differences among people (sexual orientation, class, race, age, etc.) serve as oppressive measures towards women and change the experience of living as a woman in society. Collins, Audre Lorde (in Sister Outsider), and bell hooks point towards either/or thinking as an influence on this oppression and as further intensifying these differences.[46] Specifically, Collins refers to this as the construct of dichotomous oppositional difference. This construct is characterized by its focus on differences rather than similarities.[47]:S20 Lisa A. Flores suggests, when individuals live in the borders, they "find themselves with a foot in both worlds". The result is "the sense of being neither" exclusively one identity nor another.[48]

Standpoint epistemology and the outsider within

Both Collins and Dorothy Smith have been instrumental in providing a sociological definition of standpoint theory. A standpoint is an individual's unique world perspective. The theoretical basis of this approach views societal knowledge as being located within an individual's specific geographic location. In turn, knowledge becomes distinctly unique and subjective; it varies depending on the social conditions under which it was produced.[49]:392

The concept of the outsider within refers to a unique standpoint encompassing the self, family, and society.[47]:S14 This relates to the specific experiences to which people are subjected as they move from a common cultural world (i.e., family) to that of modern society.[45]:207 Therefore, even though a woman—especially a Black woman—may become influential in a particular field, she may feel as though she does not belong. Their personalities, behavior, and cultural being overshadow their value as an individual; thus, they become the outsider within.[47]:S14

Resisting oppression

Speaking from a critical standpoint, Collins points out that Brittan and Maynard say that "domination always involves the objectification of the dominated; all forms of oppression imply the devaluation of the subjectivity of the oppressed".[47]:S18 She later notes that self-valuation and self-definition are two ways of resisting oppression. Practicing self-awareness helps to preserve the self-esteem of the group that is being oppressed and allows them to avoid any dehumanizing outside influences.

Marginalized groups often gain a status of being an "other".[47]:S18 In essence, you are "an other" if you are different from what Audre Lorde calls the mythical norm. "Others" are virtually anyone that differs from the societal schema of an average white male. Gloria Anzaldúa theorizes that the sociological term for this is "othering", or specifically attempting to establish a person as unacceptable based on a certain criterion that fails to be met.[45]:205

In practice

Intersectionality can be applied to nearly all fields from politics,[50][51] education[17][36][52] healthcare,[53][54] and employment, to economics.[55] For example, within the institution of education, Sandra Jones' research on working-class women in academia takes into consideration meritocracy within all social strata, but argues that it is complicated by race and the external forces that oppress.[52] Additionally, people of color often experience differential treatment in the healthcare system. For example, in the period immediately after 9/11 researchers noted low birth weights and other poor birth outcomes among Muslim and Arab Americans, a result they connected to the increased racial and religious discrimination of the time.[56] Some researchers have also argued that immigration policies can affect health outcomes through mechanisms such as stress, restrictions on access to health care, and the social determinants of health.[54]

Additionally, applications with regard to property and wealth can be traced to the American historical narrative that is filled "with tensions and struggles over property—in its various forms. From the removal of Native Americans (and later Japanese Americans) from the land, to military conquest of the Mexicans, to the construction of Africans as property, the ability to define, possess, and own property has been a central feature of power in America ... [and where] social benefits accrue largely to property owners."[55] One could apply the intersectionality framework analysis to various areas where race, class, gender, sexuality and ability are affected by policies, procedures, practices, and laws in "context-specific inquiries, including, for example, analyzing the multiple ways that race and gender interact with class in the labor market; interrogating the ways that states constitute regulatory regimes of identity, reproduction, and family formation";[57] and examining the inequities in "the power relations [of the intersectionality] of whiteness ... [where] the denial of power and privilege ... of whiteness, and middle-classness", while not addressing "the role of power it wields in social relations".[58]

Intersectionality in a global context

Over the last couple of decades in the European Union (EU), there has been discussion regarding the intersections of social classifications and the need to acknowledge their functions. Before Crenshaw coined her definition of intersectionality, there was a debate on what these societal categories were, and how they played a role in the lives of many minorities. What was once a more cut and dried categorization between gender, race, and class has turned into a multidimensional intersection of "race" including religion, sexuality, ethnicities, etc. In the EU and UK, they refer to these intersections under the notion of multiple discrimination. The EU passed a non-discrimination law which addresses these multiple intersections; however, there is debate on whether the law is still proactively focusing on the proper inequalities.[59] The EU is not the only organization that is acknowledging this concept. People around the world are taking a new approach when identifying other identities as well as their own; however, there are still places that follow the traditional process of categorization as stated in the following quote. "The impact of patriarchy and traditional assumptions about gender and families are evident in the lives of Chinese migrant workers (Chow, Tong), sex workers and their clients in South Korea (Shin), and Indian widows (Chauhan), but also Ukrainian migrants (Amelina) and Australian men of the new global middle class (Connell)."[60] This text suggests that there are many more intersections of discrimination for people around the globe than Crenshaw originally accounted for in her definition.

For example, Chandra Mohanty discusses alliances between women throughout the world as intersectionality in a global context. She rejects the western feminist theory, especially when it writes about global women of color and generally associated "third world women". She argues that "third world women" are often thought of as a homogenous entity, when, in fact, their experience of oppression is informed by their geography, history, and culture. When western feminists write about women in the global South in this way, they dismiss the inherent intersecting identities that are present in the dynamic of feminism in the global South. Mohanty questions the performance of intersectionality and relationality of power structures within the US and colonialism and how to work across identities with this history of colonial power structures.[61] This lack of homogeneity and intersecting identities can be seen through Feminism in India, which goes over how women in India practice feminism within social structures and the continuing effects of colonization that differ from that of Western and other non-Western countries.

This is elaborated on by Christine Bose, who discusses a global use of intersectionality which works to remove associations of specific inequalities with specific institutions, while showing that these systems generate intersectional effects. She uses this approach to develop a framework that can analyze gender inequalities across different nations and differentiates this from an approach (the one that Mohanty was referring to) which, one, paints national-level inequalities as the same and, two, differentiates only between the global North and South. This is manifested through the intersection of global dynamics like economics, migration, or violence, with regional dynamics, like histories of the nation or gendered inequalities in education and property education.[62]

There is an issue globally with the way the law interacts with intersectionality, for example, the UK's legislation to protect workers rights has a distinct issue with intersectionality. Under the Equality Act 2010, the things that are listed as 'protected characteristics' are "age, disability, gender reassignment, marriage or civil partnership, pregnancy and maternity, race, religion or belief, sex and sexual orientation".[63] "Section 14 contains a provision to cover direct discrimination on up to two combined grounds—known as combined or dual discrimination. However, this section has never been brought into effect as the government deemed it too 'complicated and burdensome' for businesses."[64] This demonstrates a systematic neglect of the issues that intersectionality presents, because the UK courts have explicitly decided not to cover intersectional discrimination in their courts.

Transnational intersectionality

Third World feminists and transnational feminists criticize intersectionality as a concept emanating from WEIRD (Western, educated, industrialized, rich, democratic)[65] societies that unduly universalizes women's experiences.[66][67] Third world feminists have worked to revise Western conceptualizations of intersectionality that assume all women experience the same type of gender and racial oppression.[66][68] Shelly Grabe coined the term "transnational intersectionality" to represent a more comprehensive conceptualization of intersectionality. Grabe wrote, "Transnational intersectionality places importance on the intersections among gender, ethnicity, sexuality, economic exploitation, and other social hierarchies in the context of empire building or imperialist policies characterized by historical and emergent global capitalism."[69] Both Third World and transnational feminists advocate attending to "complex and intersecting oppressions and multiple forms of resistance".[66][68]

Social work

In the field of social work, proponents of intersectionality hold that unless service providers take intersectionality into account, they will be of less use for various segments of the population, such as those reporting domestic violence or disabled victims of abuse. According to intersectional theory, the practice of domestic violence counselors in the United States urging all women to report their abusers to police is of little use to women of color due to the history of racially motivated police brutality, and those counselors should adapt their counseling for women of color.[70]

Women with disabilities encounter more frequent domestic abuse with a greater number of abusers. Health care workers and personal care attendants perpetrate abuse in these circumstances, and women with disabilities have fewer options for escaping the abusive situation.[71] There is a "silence" principle concerning the intersectionality of women and disability, which maintains an overall social denial of the prevalence of abuse among the disabled and leads to this abuse being frequently ignored when encountered.[72] A paradox is presented by the overprotection of people with disabilities combined with the expectations of promiscuous behavior of disabled women.[71][72] This leads to limited autonomy and social isolation of disabled individuals, which place women with disabilities in situations where further or more frequent abuse can occur.[71]

Criticism

Methods and ideology

According to political theorist Rebecca Reilly-Cooper intersectionality relies heavily on standpoint theory, which has its own set of criticisms. Intersectionality posits that an oppressed person is often the best person to judge their experience of oppression; however, this can create paradoxes when people who are similarly oppressed have different interpretations of similar events. Such paradoxes make it very difficult to synthesize a common actionable cause based on subjective testimony alone.[73] Other narratives, especially those based on multiple intersections of oppression, are more complex.[74] Davis (2008) asserts that intersectionality is ambiguous and open-ended, and that its "lack of clear-cut definition or even specific parameters has enabled it to be drawn upon in nearly any context of inquiry".[75]

Rekia Jibrin and Sara Salem argue that intersectional theory creates a unified idea of anti-oppression politics that requires a lot out of its adherents, often more than can reasonably be expected, creating difficulties achieving praxis. They also say that intersectional philosophy encourages a focus on the issues inside the group instead of on society at large, and that intersectionality is "a call to complexity and to abandon oversimplification... this has the parallel effect of emphasizing 'internal differences' over hegemonic structures".[76][lower-alpha 1]

Writing in the New Statesman, Helen Lewis adds that in emphasizing internal differences over hegemonic structures, and having complex and at times contradictory recommendations, it can create paralysis because it is not very accessible.[77]

The moral psychologist Jonathan Haidt, in a speech at the American conservative think tank Manhattan Institute, criticized the theory by saying:

[In intersectionality] the binary dimensions of oppression are said to be interlocking and overlapping. America is said to be one giant matrix of oppression, and its victims cannot fight their battles separately. They must all come together to fight their common enemy, the group that sits at the top of the pyramid of oppression: the straight, white, cis-gendered, able-bodied Christian or Jewish or possibly atheist male. This is why a perceived slight against one victim group calls forth protest from all victim groups. This is why so many campus groups now align against Israel. Intersectionality is like NATO for social-justice activists.[78]

Barbara Tomlinson is employed at the Department of Women's Studies at UC Santa Barbara and has been critical of the applications of intersectional theory. She has identified several ways in which the conventional theory has been destructive to the movement. She asserts that the common practice of using intersectionality to attack other ways of feminist thinking and the tendency of academics to critique intersectionality instead of using intersectionality as a tool to critique other conventional ways of thinking has been a misuse of the ideas it stands for. Tomlinson argues that in order to use intersectional theory correctly, intersectional feminists must not only consider the arguments but the tradition and mediums through which these arguments are made. Conventional academics are likely to favor writings by authors or publications with prior established credibility instead of looking at the quality of each piece individually, contributing to negative stereotypes associated with both feminism and intersectionality by having weaker arguments in defense of feminism and intersectionality become prominent based on renown. She goes on to argue that this allows critics of intersectionality to attack these weaker arguments, "[reducing] intersectionality's radical critique of power to desires for identity and inclusion, and offer a deradicalized intersectionality as an asset for dominant disciplinary discourses".[79]

Sharon Goldman of the Israel-America Studies Program at Shalem College also criticized intersectionality on the basis of its being too simplistic. Goldman stipulates that many of the people championed by intersectionality truly are victims of oppression, but her reading of the ideology is that it favors the powerless over the powerful regardless of context. Any group that overcomes adversity, achieves independence, or defends itself successfully is seen as corrupt or imperialist by intersectionality adherents. The examples Goldman gives are American Jews who, inspired by the abject victimhood of the Holocaust, engaged in politics to successfully advance their ideas into the American mainstream. American Jews are not given the benefit of the doubt by intersectionality adherents because they proudly reject victimization.[80]

Lisa Downing argues that because intersectionality focuses too much on group identities, which can lead it to ignore the fact that people are individuals, not just members of a class. Ignoring this can cause intersectionality to lead to a simplistic analysis and inaccurate assumptions about how a person's values and attitudes are determined.[81]

Psychology
Main articles: Biases and Heuristics in judgment and decision-making

Researchers in psychology have incorporated intersection effects since the 1950s. These intersection effects were based on studying the lenses of biases, heuristics, stereotypes, and judgments. Psychologists have extended research in psychological biases to the areas of cognitive and motivational psychology. What is found, is that every human mind has its own biases in judgment and decision-making that tend to preserve the status quo by avoiding change and attention to ideas that exist outside one's personal realm of perception.[82] Psychological interaction effects span a range of variables, although person-by-situation effects are the most examined category. As a result, psychologists do not construe the interaction effect of demographics such as gender and race as either more noteworthy or less noteworthy than any other interaction effect. In addition, oppression can be regarded as a subjective construct when viewed as an absolute hierarchy. Even if an objective definition of oppression was reached, person-by-situation effects would make it difficult to deem certain persons or categories of persons as uniformly oppressed. For instance, black men are stereotypically perceived as violent, which may be a disadvantage in police interactions, but also as physically attractive,[83][84] which may be advantageous in romantic situations.[85]

Psychological studies have shown that the effect of multiplying "oppressed" identities is not necessarily additive, but rather interactive in complex ways. For instance, black gay men may be more positively evaluated than black heterosexual men, because the "feminine" aspects of gay stereotypes temper the hypermasculine and aggressive aspect of black stereotypes.[85][86]

Alan Dershowitz, scholar of United States constitutional law and criminal law in answering a question on the criticism of Israel by intersectional movements, he stated that the concept of intersectionality is an oversimplification of reality that makes LGBT activists stand in solidarity with advocates of Sharia, even though Islamic law denies the rights of the former. He feels that identity politics does not evaluate ideas or individuals on the basis of the quality of their character. Dershowitz argues that in academia, intersectionality is taught with a large influence from antisemitism. He states that Jews are actually more liberal and supportive of equal rights than many other religious sects.[87]

Writer and political activist Chloé Valdary considers intersectionality "a rigid system for determining who is virtuous and who is not, based on traits like skin color, gender, and financial status". Valdary also states:

Intersectionality's greatest flaw is in reducing human beings to political abstractions, which is never a tendency that turns out well—in part because it so severely flattens our complex human experience, and therefore fails to adequately describe reality. As it turns out, one can be personally successful and still come from a historically oppressed community—or vice versa. The human experience is complex and multifaceted and deeper than the superficial ways in which intersectionalists describe it.[88]

As zealotry

Conservative political commentator Andrew Sullivan argues that the practice of intersectionality "manifests itself almost as a religion. It posits a classic orthodoxy through which all of human experience is explained—and through which all speech must be filtered."[89] David A. French, writer for the National Review, states that proponents of intersectionality are "zealots of a new religious faith" intending to fill a "religion-shaped hole in the human heart".[90]

See also

Notes
  1. See hegemony and cultural hegemony.

References
  1. Tucker, Abigail. "How Much is Being Attractive Worth?". Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 22 June 2020.
  2. Yonce, Kelsey (1 January 2014). "Attractiveness privilege : the unearned advantages of physical attractivenesss". Theses, Dissertations, and Projects.
  3. Kimhi, Omer (22 April 2018). "Falling Short – the Discrimination of Height Discrimination". Rochester, NY. Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  4. "What Does Intersectional Feminsim Actually Mean?". International Women's Development Agency. 11 May 2018. Archived from the original on 23 April 2019.
  5. Cooper, Brittney (1 February 2016). Disch, Lisa; Hawkesworth, Mary (eds.). Intersectionality. 1. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199328581.013.20.
  6. Crenshaw, Kimberlé, The urgency of intersectionality, retrieved 26 November 2019
  7. Kimberlé Crenshaw (14 March 2016). Kimberlé Crenshaw – On Intersectionality – keynote – WOW 2016 (Video). Southbank Centre via YouTube. Archived from the original on 10 June 2016. Retrieved 31 May 2016.
  8. "Kimberlé Crenshaw on Intersectionality, More than Two Decades Later". Archived from the original on 23 February 2019. Retrieved 9 March 2019.
  9. Kimberlé Krenshaw (1989). "Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics" (PDF). University of Chicago Legal Forum. Archived (PDF) from the original on 13 May 2018. Retrieved 7 June 2020.
  10. "Kimberlé Crenshaw on intersectionality: 'I wanted to come up with an everyday metaphor that anyone could use'". New Statesman. 2 April 2014. Archived from the original on 18 May 2018. Retrieved 10 March 2016.
  11. Hooks, Bell (2014) [1984]. Feminist Theory: from margin to center (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge. ISBN 9781138821668.
  12. Davis, Angela Y. (1983). Women, Race & Class. New York: Vintage Books. ISBN 9780394713519.
  13. Thompson, Becky (Summer 2002). "Multiracial feminism: recasting the chronology of Second Wave Feminism". Feminist Studies. 28 (2): 337–360. doi:10.2307/3178747. JSTOR 3178747.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  14. Fixmer-Oraiz, Natalie; Wood, Julia (2015). Gendered Lives: Communication, Gender, & Culture. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning. pp. 59–60. ISBN 978-1-305-28027-4.
  15. Grady, Constance (20 March 2018). "The waves of feminism, and why people keep fighting over them, explained". Vox. Archived from the original on 5 April 2019. Retrieved 7 May 2019.
  16. Fixmer-Oraiz, Natalie; Wood, Julia (2015). Gendered Lives: Communication, Gender, & Culture. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning. pp. 72–73. ISBN 978-1-305-28027-4.
  17. McCall, Leslie (Spring 2005). "The complexity of intersectionality". Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society. 30 (3): 1771–1800. doi:10.1086/426800. JSTOR 10.1086/426800.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link) Pdf.
  18. Carastathis, Anna (2016). Leong, Karen J.; Smith, Andrea (eds.). Intersectionality: Origins, Contestations, Horizons. University of Nebraska Press. ISBN 9780803285552. JSTOR j.ctt1fzhfz8.
  19. Mueller, Ruth Caston (1954). "The National Council of Negro Women, Inc". Negro History Bulletin. 18 (2): 27–31. ISSN 0028-2529. JSTOR 44175227.
  20. Wiegman, Robyn (2012), "Critical kinship (universal aspirations and intersectional judgements) Archived 2017-12-01 at the Wayback Machine", in Wiegman, Robyn, ed. (2012). Object lessons. Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press. p. 244. ISBN 9780822351603.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
    Citing:
  21. Johnson, Amanda Walker (2 October 2017). "Resituating the Crossroads: Theoretical Innovations in Black Feminist Ethnography". Souls. 19 (4): 401–415. doi:10.1080/10999949.2018.1434350. ISSN 1099-9949.
  22. Norman, Brian (2007). "'We' in Redux: The Combahee River Collective's Black Feminist Statement". differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies. 18 (2): 104. doi:10.1215/10407391-2007-004.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  23. Guy-Sheftall, Beverly (1995). Words of fire : an anthology of African-American feminist thought. New York: New Press. ISBN 9781565842564. Retrieved 7 May 2019.
  24. King, Deborah K. (1988). "Multiple Jeopardy, Multiple Consciousness: The Context of a Black Feminist Ideology". Signs. 14 (1): 42–72. doi:10.1086/494491. ISSN 0097-9740. JSTOR 3174661.
  25. Buikema, Plate & Thiele, R., L.K. (2009). Doing Gender in Media, Art and Culture: A Comprehensive Guide to Gender Studies. Routeledge. pp. 63–65. ISBN 978-0415493833.
  26. Truth, Sojourner (2001). ""Speech at the Woman's Rights Convention, Akron, Ohio" (1851)". 'Speech at the Woman's Rights Convention, Akron, Ohio' (1851). Available Means. University of Pittsburgh Press. pp. 144–146. doi:10.2307/j.ctt5hjqnj.28. ISBN 9780822979753.
  27. "Full text of 'Demarginalizing The Intersection of Race And Sex A Black Feminis'". archive.org. Archived from the original on 29 December 2018. Retrieved 23 August 2018.
  28. Crenshaw, Kimberlé (1989). "Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: a Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics". University of Chicago Legal Forum. 1989: 139–168. Archived from the original on 28 April 2019. Retrieved 2 June 2019.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  29. Thomas, Sheila; Crenshaw, Kimberlé (Spring 2004). "Intersectionality: the double bind of race and gender" (PDF). Perspectives Magazine. American Bar Association. p. 2. Archived (PDF) from the original on 18 January 2012. Retrieved 14 June 2011.
  30. Crenshaw, Kimberlé (July 1991). "Mapping the margins: intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color". Stanford Law Review. 43 (6): 1241–1299. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.695.5934. doi:10.2307/1229039. JSTOR 1229039.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  31. Mann, Susan A.; Huffman, Douglas J. (January 2005). "The decentering of second wave feminism and the rise of the third wave". Science & Society. 69 (1): 56–91. doi:10.1521/siso.69.1.56.56799. JSTOR 40404229.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  32. Collins, Patricia Hill (March 2000). "Gender, black feminism, and black political economy". Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 568 (1): 41–53. doi:10.1177/000271620056800105.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  33. Collins, Patricia Hill (2009) [1990], "Towards a politics of empowerment Archived 2 December 2017 at the Wayback Machine", in Collins, Patricia Hill, ed. (2009). Black feminist thought: knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge. p. 277. ISBN 9780415964722.
  34. Collins, Patricia H. (2015). "Intersectionality's definitional dilemmas". Annual Review of Sociology. 41: 1–20. doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-073014-112142.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  35. Brah, Avtar; Phoenix, Ann (2004). "Ain't I A Woman? Revisiting intersectionality". Journal of International Women's Studies. 5 (3): 75–86. Archived from the original on 2 December 2017. Retrieved 1 December 2017.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link) Pdf. Archived 2 December 2017 at the Wayback Machine
  36. Cooper, Anna Julia (2017) [1892], "The colored woman's office Archived 2 December 2017 at the Wayback Machine", in Lemert, Charles, ed. (2016). Social theory: the multicultural, global, and classic readings (6th ed.). Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press. ISBN 9780813350448.
  37. "Audre Lorde". 15 May 2020.
  38. http://s18.middlebury.edu/AMST0325A/Lorde_The_Masters_Tools.pdf
  39. Moraga, Cherríe; Anzaldúa, Gloria, eds. (2015). This bridge called my back: writings by radical women of color (4th ed.). Albany: State University of New York (SUNY) Press. ISBN 9781438454382.
  40. hooks, bell (1981). Ain't I a Woman: Black Women and Feminism. London & Boston, MA: Pluto Press South End Press. ISBN 978-0-86104-379-8.
  41. D'Agostino, Maria; Levine, Helisse (2011), "Feminist theories and their application to public administration", in D'Agostino, Maria; Levine, Helisse, eds. (2011). Women in Public Administration: theory and practice. Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning. p. 8. ISBN 9780763777258.
  42. Belleau, Marie-Claire (2007), "'L'intersectionalité': Feminisms in a divided world; Québec-Canada Archived 2 December 2017 at the Wayback Machine", in Orr, Deborah; et al., eds. (2007). Feminist Politics: identity, difference, and agency. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. pp. 51–62. ISBN 978-0-7425-4778-0.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  43. Patil, Vrushali (1 June 2013). "From Patriarchy to Intersectionality: A Transnational Feminist Assessment of How Far We've Really Come". Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society. 38 (4): 847–867. doi:10.1086/669560. ISSN 0097-9740. JSTOR 10.1086/669560.
  44. Browne, Irene; Misra, Joya (August 2003). "The intersection of gender and race in the labor market". Annual Review of Sociology. 29: 487–513. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.29.010202.100016. JSTOR 30036977.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link) Pdf. Archived 2 December 2017 at the Wayback Machine
  45. Ritzer, George; Stepinisky, Jeffrey (2013). Contemporary sociological theory and its classical roots: the basics (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. pp. 204–207. ISBN 9780078026782.
  46. Dudley, Rachel A. (2006). "Confronting the concept of intersectionality: the legacy of Audre Lorde and contemporary feminist organizations". McNair Scholars Journal. 10 (1): 5. Archived from the original on 1 December 2017. Retrieved 1 December 2017.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  47. Collins, Patricia Hill (December 1986). "Learning from the outsider within: the sociological significance of black feminist thought". Social Problems. 33 (6): s14–s32. doi:10.2307/800672. JSTOR 800672.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  48. Flores, "Creating Discursive Space," 142
  49. Mann, Susan A.; Kelley, Lori R. (August 1997). "Standing at the crossroads of modernist thought: Collins, Smith, and the new feminist epistemologies". Gender & Society. 11 (4): 391–408. doi:10.1177/089124397011004002.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  50. Hancock, Ange-Marie (June 2007). "Intersectionality as a normative and empirical paradigm". Politics & Gender. 3 (2): 248–254. doi:10.1017/S1743923X07000062.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  51. Holvino, Evangelina (May 2010). "Intersections: The simultaneity of race, gender and class in organization studies". Gender, Work & Organization. 17 (3): 248–277. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0432.2008.00400.x.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  52. Jones, Sandra J. (December 2003). "Complex subjectivities: class, ethnicity, and race in women's narratives of upward mobility". Journal of Social Issues. 59 (4): 803–820. doi:10.1046/j.0022-4537.2003.00091.x.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  53. Kelly, Ursula A. (April–June 2009). "Integrating intersectionality and biomedicine in health disparities research". Advances in Nursing Science. 32 (2): E42–E56. doi:10.1097/ANS.0b013e3181a3b3fc. PMID 19461221.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  54. Viruell-Fuentes, Edna A.; Miranda, Patricia Y.; Abdulrahim, Sawsan (December 2012). "More than culture: Structural racism, intersectionality theory, and immigrant health". Social Science & Medicine. 75 (12): 2099–2106. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.12.037. PMID 22386617.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link) Pdf. Archived 2 February 2017 at the Wayback Machine
  55. Ladson-Billings, Gloria; Tate IV, William F. (1995). "Toward a critical race theory of education (id: 1410)". Teachers College Record. 97 (1): 47–68. Archived from the original on 1 December 2017. Retrieved 1 December 2017.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link) Pdf. Archived 5 October 2016 at the Wayback Machine
  56. Lauderdale, Diane S. (February 2006). "Birth outcomes for Arabic-named women in California before and after September 11". Demography. 43 (1): 185–201. doi:10.1353/dem.2006.0008. PMID 16579214.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link) Pdf. Archived 2 February 2017 at the Wayback Machine
  57. Cho, Sumi; Crenshaw, Kimberlé Williams; McCall, Leslie (Summer 2013). "Toward a field of intersectionality studies: theory, applications, and praxis". Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society. 38 (4): 785–810. doi:10.1086/669608. JSTOR 10.1086/669608.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  58. Levine-Rasky, Cynthia (2011). "Intersectionality theory applied to whiteness and middle-classness". Social Identities: Journal for the Study of Race, Nation and Culture. 17 (2): 239–253. doi:10.1080/13504630.2011.558377.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  59. Lawson, Anna. European Union Non-Discrimination Law and Intersectionality : Investigating the Triangle of Racial, Gender and Disability Discrimination, edited by Dagmar Schiek, Routledge, 2011. ProQuest Ebook Central
  60. Analyzing Gender, Intersectionality, and Multiple Inequalities: Global, Transnational and Local Contexts, edited by Esther Ngan-ling Chow, and Tan Lin, Emerald Publishing Limited, 2011. ProQuest Ebook Central
  61. Mohanty, Chandra (Spring–Autumn 1984). "Under Western Eyes: Feminist Scholarship and Colonial Discourses". Boundary 2. 12 (3): 333. doi:10.2307/302821. JSTOR 302821.CS1 maint: date format (link)
  62. Bose, Christine E. (2012). "Intersectionality and Global Gender Inequality". Gender and Society. 26 (1): 67–72. doi:10.1177/0891243211426722. ISSN 0891-2432. JSTOR 23212241.
  63. "Intersectionality: What is it and why does it matter for employers?".
  64. "Intersectionality: What is it and why does it matter for employers?".
  65. Henrich, J.; Heine, S. J.; Norenzayan, A. (2010). "The weirdest people in the world?". Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 33 (2–3): 61–83. doi:10.1017/S0140525X0999152X. PMID 20550733.
  66. Herr, R. S. (2014). "Reclaiming third world feminism: Or why transnational feminism needs third world feminism". Meridians. 12: 1–30. doi:10.2979/meridians.12.1.1.
  67. Kurtis, T.; Adams, G. (2015). "Decolonizing liberation: Toward a transnational feminist psychology". Journal of Social and Political Psychology. 3 (2): 388–413. doi:10.5964/jspp.v3i1.326. JSTOR 3178747.
  68. Collins, L. H.; Machizawa, S.; Rice, J. K. (2019). Transnational Psychology of Women: Expanding International and Intersectional Approaches (1st ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. ISBN 978-1-4338-3069-3.
  69. Grabe, S.; Else-Quest, N. M. (2012). "The role of transnational feminism in psychology: Complementary visions". Psychology of Women Quarterly. 36: 158–161. doi:10.1177/0361684312442164.
  70. Bent-Goodley, Tricia B.; Chase, Lorraine; Circo, Elizabeth A.; Antá Rodgers, Selena T. (2010), "Our survival, our strengths: understanding the experiences of African American women in abusive relationships Archived 2 December 2017 at the Wayback Machine", in Lockhart, Lettie; Danis, Fran S., eds. (2010). Domestic violence intersectionality and culturally competent practice. New York: Columbia University Press. p. 77. ISBN 9780231140270.
  71. Cramer, Elizabeth P.; Plummer, Sara-Beth (2010), "Social work practice with abused persons with disabilities Archived 2 December 2017 at the Wayback Machine", in Lockhart, Lettie; Danis, Fran S., eds. (2010). Domestic violence intersectionality and culturally competent practice. New York: Columbia University Press. pp. 131–134. ISBN 9780231140270.
  72. Chenoweth, Lesley (December 1996). "Violence and women with disabilities: silence and paradox". Violence Against Women. 2 (4): 391–411. doi:10.1177/1077801296002004004.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  73. Reilly-Cooper, Rebecca (15 April 2013). "Intersectionality and identity politics". More Radical With Age. Archived from the original on 2 November 2017. Retrieved 23 June 2017.
  74. Kofi Bright, Liam; Malinsky, Daniel; Thompson, Morgan (January 2016). "Causally interpreting intersectionality theory". Philosophy of Science. 18 (1): 60–81. doi:10.1086/684173.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link) Pdf. Archived 22 August 2017 at the Wayback Machine
  75. Davis, Kathy (April 2008). "Intersectionality as buzzword: A sociology of science perspective on what makes a feminist theory successful". Feminist Theory. 9 (1): 67–85. doi:10.1177/1464700108086364.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  76. Jibrin, Rekia; Salem, Sara (2015). "Revisiting intersectionality: reflections on theory and praxis". Trans-Scripts: An Interdisciplinary Online Journal in the Humanities and Social Sciences. 5. Archived from the original on 27 May 2017. Retrieved 1 December 2017. Pdf. Archived 19 February 2018 at the Wayback Machine
  77. Lewis, Helen (20 February 2014). "The uses and abuses of intersectionality". New Statesman. Archived from the original on 8 June 2017. Retrieved 23 June 2017.
  78. Jonathan Haidt (17 December 2017). "The Age of Outrage". City Journal. Archived from the original on 6 March 2018. Retrieved 6 March 2018.
  79. Tomlinson, Barbara (Summer 2013). "To Tell the Truth and Not Get Trapped: Desire, Distance, and Intersectionality at the Scene of Argument". Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society. 38 (4): 993–1017. doi:10.1086/669571.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  80. Goldman, Sharon. "Jews Must Not Embrace Powerlessness." Archived 27 February 2019 at the Wayback Machine Commentary. February 2019. 26 February 2019.
  81. Downing, Lisa. "The body politic: Gender, the right wing and ‘identity category violations’." French Cultural Studies 29, no. 4 (2018): 367-377.
  82. Gorrell, Michael Gorrell (2011). "Combining NetLibrary E-books with the EBSCOhost Platform". Information Standards Quarterly. 23 (2): 31. doi:10.3789/isqv23n2.2011.07. ISSN 1041-0031.
  83. Lewis, Michael B. (9 February 2012). "A facial attractiveness account of gender asymmetries in interracial marriage". PLOS ONE. 7 (2): e31703. Bibcode:2012PLoSO...731703L. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0031703. PMC 3276508. PMID 22347504.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  84. Lewis, Michael B. (January 2011). "Who is the fairest of them all? Race, attractiveness and skin color sexual dimorphism". Personality and Individual Differences. 50 (2): 159–162. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.09.018.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  85. Pedulla, David S. (March 2014). "The positive consequences of negative stereotypes: race, sexual orientation, and the job application process". Social Psychology Quarterly. 77 (1): 75–94. doi:10.1177/0190272513506229.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  86. Remedios, Jessica D.; Chasteen, Alison L.; Rule, Nicholas O.; Plaks, Jason E. (November 2011). "Impressions at the intersection of ambiguous and obvious social categories: Does gay + Black = likable?" (PDF). Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 47 (6): 1312–1315. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.05.015. hdl:1807/33199.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
  87. Frommer, Rachel (28 September 2017). "Alan Dershowitz derides theory of intersectionality in Columbia lecture". The Washington Free Beacon. Archived from the original on 7 October 2017. Retrieved 6 October 2017.
  88. Valdary, Chloé. "What Farrakhan Shares With the Intersectional Left" Archived 29 March 2018 at the Wayback Machine Tablet Magazine. 26 March 2018. 28 March 2018.
  89. Sullivan, Andrew (10 March 2017). "Is Intersectionality a Religion?". Intelligencer. New York Magazine. Archived from the original on 17 April 2019. Retrieved 17 April 2019.
  90. French, David A. (6 March 2018). "Intersectionality, the Dangerous Faith". National Review. Archived from the original on 7 March 2018. Retrieved 17 April 2019.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.