Modal share

A modal share (also called mode split, mode-share, or modal split) is the percentage of travellers using a particular type of transportation or number of trips using said type.[1] In freight transportation, this may be measured in mass.

Modal share is an important component in developing sustainable transport within a city or region. In recent years, many cities have set modal share targets for balanced and sustainable transport modes, particularly 30% of non-motorized (cycling and walking) and 30% of public transport. These goals reflect a desire for a modal shift, or a change between modes, and usually encompasses an increase in the proportion of trips made using sustainable modes.[2]

Comparability of data

Modal share data is usually obtained by travel surveys, which are often conducted by local governments, using different methodologies. Sampling and interviewing techniques, definitions, the extent of geographical areas and other methodological differences can influence comparability. Most typical surveys refer to the main mode of transport used during trips to work.[3] Surveys covering entire metropolitan ares are preferred over city proper surveys which typically cover only the denser inner city.

The following tables present the modal split of journeys to work. Note that it is better to use a measure of all trips on a typical weekday, but journey to work data is more readily available. It would also be beneficial to disaggregate private motor vehicles figures to car driver and car passenger.

Cities with over 1,000,000 inhabitants

Citywalkingcyclingpublic transportprivate motor vehicleyear Survey Area
Australia Adelaide3%1%11%85%2016[4] GCCSA
United States Atlanta 1% 0% 3% 86% 2016[5] UA
Greece Athens8%2%37%53%2006 [6]
New Zealand Auckland4%1%9%85%2011-2014[7] MUA
United States Baltimore 3% 0% 7% 84% 2016[8] UA
Spain Barcelona32%2%39%27%2013[9]
China Beijing21%32%26%21%2005/2011[10]
Serbia Belgrade23%1%49%27%2015
Germany Berlin29%15%26%30%2012
Australia Brisbane4%1%14%81%2016[11] GCCSA
Belgium Brussels25%2.5%28%43%2010[12]
Colombia Bogota15%2%64%19%2008[10]
United States Boston5%1%14%73%2016[13] UA
Hungary Budapest32%1%47%20%2011
Canada Calgary 4.7% 1.5% 14.4% 79.4% 2016
United States Chicago3%1%13%77%2016[14] UA
United States Dallas1%0%2%90%2016[15] UA
South Korea Daejeon26%2%28%44%2012[16]
India Delhi21%12%48%19%2008/2011[10]
United States Detroit 1% 0% 2% 92% 2016[17]
Canada Edmonton 3.7% 1.0% 11.3% 84% 2016
Germany Hamburg28%12%18%42%2008[18]
United States Houston1%0%2%91%2016[19] UA
United States Indianapolis1%0%1%91%2016[20] UA
United States Las Vegas1%0%4%90%2016[21] UA
United Kingdom London24%2%37%37%2016[22]
United States Los Angeles3%1%5%85%2016[23] UA
Spain Madrid36%0%34%30%2006[10]
Australia Melbourne4%2%19%76%2016[11] GCCSA
United States Miami 2% 1% 4% 87% 2016[24] UA
Italy Milan17%6%41%36%2007 [25]
Belarus Minsk13%1%63%20%2016 [26]
Canada Montreal5%2%22%70%2016[27] CMA
India Mumbai27%6%52%15%2008/2011[10]
Germany Munich28%17%21%37%2011[28]
United States New York City6%1%33%55%2016[29] UA
Japan Osaka27%21%34%18%2000[30]
Canada Ottawa 8% 2% 18% 72% 2016[31] CMA
France Paris15%5%59%20%2010[32]
Australia Perth3%1%12%84%2016[11] GCCSA
United States Philadelphia4%1%10%80%2016[33] UA
United States Phoenix2%1%2%87%2016[34] UA
United States Portland3%3%7%78%2016[35] UA
Czech Republic Prague23%1%43%33%2009[36]
Italy Rome4%1%29%66%2014[37]
United States San Antonio2%0%3%90%2016[38] UA
United States San Diego3%1%3%85%2016[39] UA
United States San Francisco5%2%20%64%2016[40] UA
United States San Jose2%2%5%84%2016[41] UA
United States Seattle4%1%10%77%2016[42] UA
China Shanghai27%20%33%20%2009/2011[10]
Singapore Singapore22%1%44%33%2011[10]
Australia Sydney5%1%27%67%2016[11] GCCSA
Taiwan Taipei15%4%33%48%2009/2010[10]
Japan Tokyo23%14%51%12%2008/2009[10]
Canada Toronto5%1%24%68%2016[43] CMA
Canada Vancouver 7% 2% 20% 69% 2016 CMA
Austria Vienna26%7%39%28%2014[44]
Poland Warsaw18%3%47%32%2015[45]
United States Washington, D.C.4%1%16%72%2016[46] UA

Cities with over 250,000 inhabitants

Citywalkingcyclingpublic transportprivate motor vehicleyear
Denmark Aarhus7%27%19%43%2004
Spain Alicante18%0%13%69%2004
Netherlands Amsterdam4%40%29%27%2014
Italy Bari13%1%14%72%2001
Switzerland Bern11%11%54%24%2001
Spain Bilbao23%0%34%43%2004
United Kingdom Birmingham1%1%25%66%2001
Italy Bologna8%4%21%67%2001
Germany Bonn9%13%21%57%2004
Slovakia Bratislava4%0%70%26%2004
Czech Republic Brno5%2%57%32%2012 [47]
United States Buffalo6%1%14%79%2012
Germany Bremen7%19%24%50%2004
United Kingdom Bristol19%8%12%55%2011 [48]
Australia Canberra5%3%8%85%2016[11]
New Zealand Christchurch6%8%9%78%2009-2012 [7]
Germany Cologne7%15%28%50%2013
Denmark Copenhagen10%30%36%26%2012
Spain Córdoba18%1%10%71%2004
Germany Dortmund7%3%23%67%2004
Germany Dresden24%17%21%38%2008
Republic of Ireland Dublin19%3%13%64%2014[49]
Germany Düsseldorf11%5%31%53%2004
Netherlands Eindhoven3%24%8%65%2004
Germany Essen9%2%20%69%2004
Italy Florence8%4%21%69%2001
Germany Frankfurt11%15%30%44%2015
Germany Freiburg im Breisgau11%13%12%63%2004
Poland Gdańsk20.8%5.9%32.1%41.2%2016[50]
Spain Gijón24%0%17%59%2004
Sweden Gothenburg12%14%21%52%2004
Germany Hanover9%13%29%49%2004
Finland Helsinki37%10%30%22%2016
Spain Las Palmas12%0%24%64%2004
Portugal Lisbon10%0%46%40%2001
Spain Málaga12%0%11%77%2004
Sweden Malmö6%25%18%51%2011
Spain Murcia18%1%7%74%2004
Italy Naples13%0%26%60%2001
Germany Nuremberg11%7%30%52%2004
Norway Oslo29%6%30%34%2013
Italy Palermo12%1%9%78%2001
Netherlands Rotterdam5%14%25%56%2004
Sweden Stockholm15%7%43%33%2004
Israel Tel Aviv16%13%28%43%2015[51]
Netherlands The Hague5%22%30%43%2004
Spain Seville13%7%18%62%2014
Germany Stuttgart13%4%32%51%2004
Estonia Tallinn16%0%50%34%2004
Italy Turin12%3%5%79%2004
Netherlands Utrecht3%34%24%39%2015
Spain Valencia16%1%21%62%2004
Spain Valladolid22%1%20%57%2004
Spain Vigo19%0%13%68%2004
Lithuania Vilnius36%0%26%38%2011[52]
New Zealand Wellington9%2%18%70%2011-2014[7]
Canada Victoria (CMA) 10% 7% 11% 70% 2016
Canada Winnipeg5%2%14%79%2016[53]
Spain Zaragoza17%0%29%54%2004
Switzerland Zürich36%6%32%25%2010[54]

Notes: European data is based on the Urban Audit,[55]

The Charter of Brussels, signed by 36 cities including Brussels, Ghent, Milan, Munich, Seville, Edinburgh, Toulouse, Bordeaux, Gdansk, and Timisoara, commits the signatories to achieve at least 15% of bicycling modal share by 2020, and calls upon European institutions to do likewise.[56]. The cycling modal share is strongly associated with the size of local cycling infrastructure [57]

See also

References

  1. Glossary (Engineering Services - Transportation, City of Vancouver website. Accessed 2009-06-04.) Archived June 3, 2006, at the Wayback Machine.
  2. http://www.ramblers.org.uk/Walking/policy/transport/transportleisure
  3. Singapore Land and Transport Authority: Journeys, issue 7, November 2011
  4. "Trends in journey to work mode shares in Australian cities to 2016 (second edition)". Charting Transport. 2017-10-24. Retrieved 2018-04-15.
  5. "Census profile: Atlanta, GA Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  6. http://www.epomm.eu/tems/result_city.phtml?city=221
  7. 1 2 3
  8. "Census profile: Baltimore, MD Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  9. http://prod-mobilitat.s3.amazonaws.com/DADESBASIQUES2013_p1.pdf
  10. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Passenger Transport Mode Shares in World Cities
  11. 1 2 3 4 5 Charting Transport, retrieved 27 October 2017
  12. Camille Thiry (ed.). "Cahiers de l'Observatoire de la mobilité de la Région de Bruxelles-Capitale: Les pratiques de déplacement à Bruxelles" (PDF) (in French). Bruxelles mobilité. p. 49. Retrieved 25 November 2013.
  13. "Census profile: Boston, MA--NH--RI Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  14. "Census profile: Chicago, IL--IN Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  15. "Census profile: Dallas--Fort Worth--Arlington, TX Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  16. [KOTI, "2013 National Transportation DB Report" 2013], retrieved 2013-12-31
  17. "Census profile: Detroit, MI Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  18. Page 7 in Infas: Mobilität im Großraum Hamburg
  19. "Census profile: Houston, TX Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  20. "Census profile: Indianapolis, IN Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  21. "Census profile: Las Vegas--Henderson, NV Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  22. Transport for London: "Travel in London" Report 10, 2017
  23. "Census profile: Los Angeles--Long Beach--Anaheim, CA Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  24. "Census profile: Miami, FL Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  25. Canada, Government of Canada, Statistics. "Census Profile, 2016 Census - Montréal [Census metropolitan area], Quebec and Quebec [Province]". www12.statcan.gc.ca. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  26. Evaluation of the marketing campaign „Radlhauptstadt München“ Archived 2014-04-08 at the Wayback Machine. (PDF; 764 kB), November 2011, retrieved 2014-10-22
  27. Bureau, U.S. Census. "American FactFinder - Results". factfinder.census.gov. Retrieved 2017-06-06.
  28. "The Truth About Osaka". janejacobsjapan. 2016-11-09. Retrieved 2018-06-18.
  29. Canada, Government of Canada, Statistics. "Census Profile, 2016 Census - Ottawa - Gatineau [Census metropolitan area], Ontario/Quebec and Ontario [Province]". www12.statcan.gc.ca. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  30. "Census profile: Philadelphia, PA--NJ--DE--MD Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  31. "Census profile: Phoenix--Mesa, AZ Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  32. "Census profile: Portland, OR--WA Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  33. The yearbook of transportation Prague 2009 Archived 2011-07-26 at the Wayback Machine., page 5, retrieved 2011-03-23
  34. FGM-AMOR. "ENDURANCE :: Countries/Cities". www.epomm.eu. Retrieved 2018-04-27.
  35. "Census profile: San Antonio, TX Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  36. "Census profile: San Diego, CA Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  37. "Census profile: San Francisco--Oakland, CA Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  38. "Census profile: San Jose, CA Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  39. "Census profile: Seattle, WA Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  40. Canada, Government of Canada, Statistics. "Census Profile, 2016 Census - Toronto [Census metropolitan area], Ontario and Toronto, Census division [Census division], Ontario". www12.statcan.gc.ca. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  41. , (German) retrieved 2015-02-10
  42. , (Polish) retrieved 2016-01-20
  43. "Census profile: Washington, DC--VA--MD Urbanized Area". Census Reporter. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  44. http://www.brno.cz/fileadmin/user_upload/sprava_mesta/magistrat_mesta_brna/OD/dokumenty_OKD/delba_prepravni_prace/Delba_prepravni_prace_2012.pdf
  45. "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-07-24. Retrieved 2013-12-04.
  46. http://www.cso.ie/en/releasesandpublications/ep/p-nts/nationaltravelsurvey2014/detailedanalysis/howwetravelled/
  47. http://www.brg.gda.pl/planowanie-przestrzenne/inne-opracowania-urbanistyczne/282-gdanskie-badania-ruchu-2016
  48. (PDF) http://civitas.eu/sites/default/files/tel_aviv-yafo_evolution_of_cycling_patterns_in_tel_aviv_benjamin_maor_haggai_yaron.pdf. Missing or empty |title= (help)
  49. Naujų transporto rūšių diegimo Vilniaus mieste specialusis planas Archived 2013-12-03 at the Wayback Machine., retrieved 2013-07-03
  50. Canada, Government of Canada, Statistics. "Census Profile, 2016 Census - Winnipeg [Census metropolitan area], Manitoba and Manitoba [Province]". www12.statcan.gc.ca. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  51. "Transport (Statistical Yearbook of the City of Zurich 2017, Chapter 11)" (PDF).
  52. Urban Audit Archived 2009-02-06 at the Wayback Machine., retrieved 2009-10-03
  53. Charter of Brussels, retrieved 2009-10-03
  54. Mueller, N (2018). "Health impact assessment of cycling network expansions in European cities". Preventive Medicine.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.