Khitan language

Khitan

Native to northeastern China, southeastern Mongolia
Region Northern
Extinct c. 1243 (Yelü Chucai, last person known who could speak and write Khitan)
Khitan large script and Khitan small script
Language codes
ISO 639-3 zkt
zkt
Glottolog kita1247[2]

Khitan or Kitan ( in large script or in small, Khitai;[3] Chinese: t 契丹, Qìdānyǔ), also known as Liao, is a now-extinct language once spoken by the Khitan people (4th to 13th century). It was the official language of the Liao dynasty (907–1125) and the Qara Khitai (1124–1218).

Classification

Khitan appears to have been related to the Mongolic languages;[4] Juha Janhunen states, "[T]he conception is gaining support that Khitan was a language in some respects radically different from the historically known Mongolic languages. If this view proves to be correct, Khitan is, indeed, best classified as a Para-Mongolic language."[1]

Alexander Vovin (2017)[5] notes that Khitan has many Koreanic loanwords, pointing to intensive contact between Korean and Khitans. Both of the Korean's Goryeo dynasty and Khitan's Liao dynasty claimed themselves to be successors of Goguryeo, thus it is possible to assume the Koreanic words in Khitan are derived from the language of Goguryeo.

Script

Khitan was written using two mutually exclusive writing systems known as the Khitan large script and the Khitan small script.[1] The small script, which was a syllabary, was used until the Jurchen-speaking Jin dynasty (1115–1234) replaced it in 1191.[6] The large script was logographic like Chinese.

Records

The History of Liao contains a volume of Khitan words transcribed in Chinese characters titled "Glossary of National Language" (國語解). It is found in Chapter 116.[7][8][9][10]

The Qianlong Emperor of the Qing dynasty erroneously identified the Khitan people and their language with the Solons, leading him to use the Solon language to "correct" Chinese character transcriptions of Khitan names in the History of Liao in his Imperial Liao-Jin-Yuan Three Histories National Language Explanation (欽定遼金元三史國語解) project.

The Liao dynasty referred to the Khitan language with the term Guoyu 國語 "National language", which was also used by other non-Han Chinese dynasties in China to refer to their languages like Manchu of the Qing, Classical Mongolian during the Yuan dynasty, Jurchen during the Jin, and Xianbei during the Northern Wei. Even today, Mandarin is referred to in Taiwan as Guoyu.

Vocabulary

There are several closed systems of Khitan lexical items for which systematic information is available.[11] The following is a list of words in these closed systems that are similar to Mongolic. Mongolian equivalents are given after the English translation:

Seasons

KhitanTranslationMongolian scriptmodern Mongolian pronunciation
heu.urspringqaburhavar
ju.unsummerjunzun
n.am.urautumnnamurnamar
u.ulwinterebülövöl

Numerals

KhitanTranslationMongolian scriptmodern Mongolian pronunciation
*omconeonca 'unique'onts (unique)
j.ur.ersecondjirin 'two'jirin (two), jiremsen (double/pregnant)
hu.ur.erthirdgurba 'three'gurav, gurvan, guramsan (triple)
durer/durenfourthdörbendöröv, dörvön
taufivetabuntav, tavan
t.ad.o.hofifthtabu-dakitav dahi
*nilsixjirguganzurgaa (innovation "jir'gur" or 2x3)
da.lo.erseventhdologa 'seven'doloo
nyo.ieightnayim 'eight'naim
*is, onyonineyesüyüs, yüsön
jauhundredjagunzuu, zuun
mingthousandmingganmyanga, myangan

Compared with Khitan, The Tungusic numerals of the Jurchen language differ significantly: three=ilan, five=shunja, seven=nadan, nine=uyun, hundred=tangu.

Animals

KhitanTranslationMongolian scriptmodern Mongolian pronunciation
te.qo.achickentaqiyatahia
ni.qodognoqainohoi
s.au.abirdsibugashuvuu
em.agoatimagayamaa
tau.li.arabbittaulaituulai
mo.rihorsemorimori
unicowüniyeünee
mu.ho.osnakemogoimogoi

Directions

KhitanTranslationMongolian scriptmodern Mongolian pronunciation
ud.ureastdorunadorno
dzi.ge.nleftjegünzüün
bo.ra.ianrightbaragunbaruun
dau.ur.unmiddledumdadund
xe.du.unhorizontalköndelenhöndölön
ja.cen.iborderjaqazasan, zaag

Time

KhitanTranslationMongolian scriptmodern Mongolian pronunciation
suninightsönishönö
un.n/un.enow,presentönöönöö

Personal relations

KhitanTranslationMongolian scriptmodern Mongolian pronunciation
c.i.isbloodcisutsus
mo kufemaleemeem
deuyounger brotherdegüdüü
n.ai.cifriendnayijanaiz
na.ha.anunclenagacanagats
s.ia/s.engoodsayinsain
g.en.unsadness, regretgenü='to regret' in the letter of Arghun Khan)genen, gem
kupersonkümünhün, hümün

Tribal administration

KhitanTranslationMongolian script
cau.urwarcagur, as in "tsa'urgalan dairakh"
nai/nai.dheads, officials"-d" is a plural suffix=noyan, noyad for plural
t.em-to bestow a titletemdeg 'sign'
k.emdecreekem kemjiye 'law/norm'
us.giletterüseg
uimatterüile
qudugblessedqutug
xe.se.gepart, section, provincekeseg
ming.anmilitary unit of thousandminggan

Basic verbs

KhitanTranslationMongolian script
p.obecomebol-
p.o.juraise(intr.)bos-
on.a.anfalluna-
x.ui.ri.ge.eitransferkür-ge-
u-giveög-
sa-to residesagu-
a-bea- 'live', as in "aj ahui"

Natural objects

KhitanTranslationMongolian scriptmodern Mongolian pronunciation
eu.ulcloudegüleüül
s.eu.kadewsigüderishüüder
sairmoonsarasar
nairsunnaranar
m.em/m.ngsilvermönggömöng

The Liaoshi records in Chapter 53:

國語謂是日為「討賽咿兒」。「討」五;「賽咿兒」,月也。

In the national (Khitan) language this day (5th day of the 5th lunar month) is called 'Tao Saiyier'. 'Tao' means five; 'Saiyier' means moon/month.

'Tao Saiyier' corresponds to Mongolian 'tavan sar' (fifth moon/month). The Turkic Kyrgyz equivalent would be 'beshinchi ay' while the Manchu (Tungusic) equivalent would be 'sunja biya'.

See also

References

  1. 1 2 3 Janhunen 2006, p. 393.
  2. Hammarström, Harald; Forkel, Robert; Haspelmath, Martin, eds. (2017). "Kitan". Glottolog 3.0. Jena, Germany: Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History.
  3. "Khitan" at Omniglot.
  4. Herbert Franke, John King Fairbank, Denis Crispin Twitchett, Roderick MacFarquhar, Denis Twitchett, Albert Feuerwerker. The Cambridge History of China, Vol. 3: Sui and T'ang China, 589–906. Part 1, p.364
  5. Vovin, Alexander (June 2017). "Koreanic loanwords in Khitan and their importance in the decipherment of the latter". Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae. 70 (2): 207–215. doi:10.1556/062.2017.70.2.4. ISSN 0001-6446.
  6. Janhunen 2006, p. 395.
  7. 遼史/卷116 卷116.
  8. pp. 123-125 Howorth, H. H.. 1881. “The Northern Frontagers of China. Part V. The Khitai or Khitans”. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland 13 (2). Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland: 121–82. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25196875.
  9. Wilkinson, Endymion Porter (2000). Chinese History: A Manual. Volume 52 of Harvard Yenching Institute Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard-Yenching Institute monograph series (illustrated, revised ed.). Harvard Univ Asia Center. p. 864. ISBN 0674002490. ISSN 0073-084X. Retrieved 24 April 2014.
  10. Heming Yong; Jing Peng (14 August 2008). Chinese Lexicography : A History from 1046 BC to AD 1911: A History from 1046 BC to AD 1911. OUP Oxford. pp. 382–. ISBN 978-0-19-156167-2.
  11. Kane, Daniel The Kitan language and script 2009, Leiden, The Netherlands

Bibliography

Juha Janhunen (2006). The Mongolic Languages. Routledge. p. 393. ISBN 978-1-135-79690-7.

Further reading

  • Franks, H. (1976): "Two Chinese-Khitan Macaronic Poems." In: Heissig, W.-Krueger, J. R.-Oinas, F. J.-Schütz, E. (eds): Tradata Altaica. Wiesbaden, Otto Harrassowitz.
  • Kane, Daniel (1989). The Sino-Jurchen Vocabulary of the Bureau of Interpreters. Uralic and Altaic Series, Vol. 153. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University, Research Institute for Inner Asian Studies. ISBN 978-0-933070-23-3.
  • Qinge'ertai (Chinggeltei); Yu Baolin; Chen Naixiong; Liu Fengzhu; Xin Fuli (1985). Qidan xiao zi yanjiu [A Study of the Khitan Small Script]. Beijing: Zhongguo Shehui Kexue Chubanshe. OCLC 16717597.
  • Jacques, Guillaume (2010). "Review of Kane 2009, The Khitan Language and Script". Diachronica. 27 (1): 157&ndash, 165. doi:10.1075/dia.27.1.05jac.
  • Vovin, Alexander (2003). "Once Again on Khitan Words in Chinese-Khitan Mixed Verses". Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae. 56 (2–4): 237&ndash, 244. doi:10.1556/AOrient.56.2003.2-4.10.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.