LGBT rights in Michigan

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) persons in the U.S. state of Michigan may face legal challenges not faced by non-LGBT residents. Same-sex sexual activity is legal in Michigan, as is same-sex marriage. Discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity is not explicitly banned within state law. However, a ruling of the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals and a decision of the Michigan Civil Rights Commission have ensured that members of the LGBT community are not discriminated against and are protected in the eyes of the law.

LGBT rights in Michigan
StatusLegal statewide since 2003
(Lawrence v. Texas)
Gender identityAltering sex on birth certificate requires sex reassignment surgery
Discrimination protectionsSexual orientation and gender identity protections (see below)
Family rights
Recognition of relationshipsSame-sex marriage legal since 2015
AdoptionYes

Michigan is home to a vibrant LGBT community. East Lansing and Ann Arbor were the first cities in the United States to pass LGBT discrimination protections, doing so in 1972. Pride parades have been held in the state's most populous city, Detroit, since 1986, and today attract thousands of people.[1] While a majority of Michiganders support same-sex marriage,[2] the Republican-controlled Legislature has mostly ignored LGBT-related legislation, and as such progress has been slow (and has thus mostly come from the courts and local municipalities).[3]

Legality of same-sex sexual activity
Equality Michigan is the state's most prominent LGBT advocacy group.

Sexual acts between persons of the same sex are legal in Michigan. They had been criminalized until the state's sodomy laws, which applied to both homosexuals and heterosexuals, were invalidated in 2003 by the United States Supreme Court's decision in Lawrence v. Texas.

Recognition of same-sex relationships
Main article: Same-sex marriage in Michigan

In 2004, voters approved a constitutional amendment, Michigan Proposal 04-2, that banned same-sex marriage and civil unions in the state. It passed with 58.6% of the vote.[4]

Same-sex marriage

On January 23, 2012, a lesbian couple filed a lawsuit, DeBoer v. Snyder in United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, challenging the state's ban on adoption by same-sex couples in order to jointly adopt their children. On March 21, 2014, U.S. District Judge Bernard Friedman ruled the state's ban on same-sex marriage unconstitutional. Attorney General Bill Schuette filed for an emergency stay of his ruling with the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals.[5] On Saturday, March 22, 2014, four of Michigan's 83 county clerks opened their offices for special hours and issued more than 300 marriage licenses to gay and lesbian couples.[6] Later that day, the Sixth Circuit stayed Judge Friedman's order until March 26.[7] On March 25, 2014, the Sixth Circuit stayed the ruling indefinitely.[8] On March 28, 2014, U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder announced the Federal Government will recognize the same-sex marriages performed on March 22.[9]

On November 6, 2014, the Sixth Circuit reversed the lower court's ruling and upheld Michigan's ban on same-sex marriage.[10] On June 26, 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Obergefell v. Hodges that same-sex couples have a nationwide right to marry, legalizing same-sex marriage in the United States, and Michigan.

Domestic partnerships
Map of Michigan counties and cities that offer domestic partner benefits either county-wide or in particular cities.
  City offers domestic partner benefits
  County-wide partner benefits through domestic partnership
  County or city does not offer domestic partner benefits

The Michigan Supreme Court ruled that the constitutional amendment forbidding recognition of same-sex relationships meant that public employers in Michigan could not legally grant domestic partnership benefits to their employees. A law in effect since December 2011 banned most public employers, though not colleges and universities, from offering health benefits to the domestic partners of their employees. It did not extend to workers whose benefits are established by the Michigan Civil Service Commission. On June 28, 2013, U.S. District Judge David M. Lawson issued a preliminary injunction blocking the state from enforcing its law banning local governments and school districts from offering health benefits to their employees' domestic partners.[11][12] He made that injunction permanent on November 12, 2014, when he ruled in Bassett v. Snyder that Michigan's restrictions on domestic partnership benefits were not related to a legitimate government purpose. He distinguished his ruling from the Sixth Circuit's ruling in DeBoer: "It is one thing to say [as in DeBoer] that states may cleave to the traditional definition of marriage as a means of encouraging biologically complementary couples to stay together and raise the offspring they produce.... It is quite another to say that a state may adopt a narrow definition of family, and pass laws that penalize those unions and households that do not conform."[13]

Adoption and parenting

Michigan has no statutory ban on same-sex couples adopting, and no Michigan state court has ever interpreted Michigan's statute as prohibiting such adoptions. However, at least one other state court has ruled that unmarried individuals may not jointly petition to adopt.[14]

Two Michigan lesbians, who are raising three children adopted by only one of them, filed a lawsuit known as DeBoer v. Snyder in federal court in January 2012 seeking to have the state's ban on adoption by same-sex couples overturned.[15] and in September amended that suit to challenge the state's ban on same-sex marriage as well.[16]

In December 2012, the Michigan Court of Appeals, an intermediate-level court, ruled in Usitalo v. Landon that the state's courts have jurisdiction to grant second-parent adoptions by same-sex couples.[17]

Following the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling striking down Michigan's ban on same-sex marriage, Michigan courts have been granting adoption rights to same-sex couples.

In September 2019, a judge within Michigan allowed discrimination against LGBT individuals adopting children within adoption agencies, on the technical legal grounds of "fundamental religious beliefs and freedoms". As with all court cases they are subject to appeal in the future.[18]

Discrimination protections
See also: LGBT employment discrimination in the United States

LGBT people are not included in Michigan's Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act.[19] As early as the 1973 committee hearing on the Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act, members of the LGBT community in Michigan sought to be included in the law.[20][21] However, actual legislation to do so was not introduced until 2005 when Michigan's first openly LGBT state legislator, Chris Kolb, included it with two other pro-LGBT bills,[22] none of which passed.[23] Since Kolb's 2005 legislation, a number of additional bills have been introduced to add protections for the LGBT community.[24]

On December 23, 2003, Governor Jennifer Granholm issued an executive order prohibiting employment discrimination state-level public sector employment on the basis of sexual orientation. The order only covers employees of the state of Michigan and does not cover public sector employees of county, school, or local-level governments.[25] On November 22, 2007, Governor Jennifer Granholm extended her executive order to include gender identity.[26] This executive order was kept under Governor Rick Snyder.

On March 14, 2013, the Michigan Senate passed, by a 37-0 vote, an emergency harbor dredging funding bill that made private marinas ineligible for a new loan program if they discriminate based on sexual orientation. On March 20, 2013, the Michigan House of Representatives passed the bill by a vote of 106-4. On March 27, 2013, Governor Rick Snyder signed an emergency harbor dredging funding bill that made private marinas ineligible for a new loan program if they discriminate based on sexual orientation.[27][28]

In January 2019, Governor Gretchen Whitmer issued an executive order prohibiting discrimination on the basis of both sexual orientation and gender identity in all areas of state government employment, including by employers receiving contracts and in grants from the state.[29]

2018 Civil Rights Commission decision

In September 2017, after the Legislature had voted 11 times to reject protecting LGBT people from discrimination, LGBT activists asked the Michigan Civil Rights Commission to declare sexual orientation and gender identity discrimination a form of sex discrimination and as such outlaw it under the Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act.[30]

On May 21, 2018, the Commission interpreted the Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act as banning discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity through the category of sex. The Commission voted 5-0 to interpret existing anti-discrimination laws as including both categories. The Michigan Department of Civil Rights began processing complaints of discrimination on May 22. This decision effectively means that LGBT discrimination is now illegal under state law.[31][32] The decision was hailed by human rights group, but denounced by conservative groups.

Michigan Attorney General Bill Schuette hit back at the decision, accusing the Commission of overstepping its authority. In July 2018, Schuette said that the decision is "invalid because it conflicts with the original intent of the Legislature as expressed in the plain language of the state's civil rights law".[33] The Commission subsequently reiterated its support for the decision, and the Department of Civil Rights announced that it would continue to investigate discrimination complaints based on sexual orientation and gender identity. "The Michigan Civil Rights Commission is an independent, constitutionally created and established body," Agustin V. Arbulu, director of the Department of Civil Rights, said. "The Commission is not bound by the opinion of the Attorney General. The only recourse is for the courts to determine if issuing the interpretive statement was within the scope of the commission's authority, and that is the appropriate venue for resolving this issue."[34] The Detroit Free Press denounced Schuette for the opinion, calling it a "shameful display of bigotry", also condemning Schuette for his association with President Donald Trump, who had endorsed him for that year's gubernatorial election, which Schuette lost to Democrat Gretchen Whitmer.[35]

EEOC v. R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes

On March 7, 2018, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit (covering Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio and Tennessee) ruled that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits employment discrimination against transgender people under the category of sex. It also ruled that employers may not use the Religious Freedom Restoration Act to justify discrimination against LGBT people. Aimee Stephens, a transgender woman, began working for a funeral home and presented as male. In 2013, she told her boss that she was transgender and planned to transition. She was promptly fired by her boss who said that "gender transition violat[es] God’s commands because a person’s sex is an immutable God-given fit."[36] With this decision, discrimination in the workplace based on gender identity is now banned in Michigan.

Local municipalities
See also: List of cities and counties in the United States offering an LGBT non-discrimination ordinance § Michigan
Map of Michigan counties, cities, and townships that have sexual orientation and/or gender identity anti–employment discrimination ordinances
  Sexual orientation and gender identity with anti–employment discrimination ordinance
  Sexual orientation with anti–employment discrimination ordinance and gender identity solely in public employment
  Sexual orientation and gender identity solely in public employment

Over thirty local municipalities have local human rights ordinances which prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation and/or gender identity in employment and housing.[37]

Ingham, Washtenaw, and Wayne counties also prohibit discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity in government employment.[38]

Municipality Sexual
orientation		 Gender
identity		 Employment
protections		 Housing
protections		 Date
Adrian April 21, 2014[39]
Albion 2015[40][41]
Ann Arbor [note 1] (1999)[43] July 1972[44][42][45]
Battle Creek September 3, 2013[46]
Bay City 2016[47]
Birmingham 1992[48]
Buchanan June 10, 2019[49]
Cadillac September 17, 2018[50]
Canton Township June 11, 2014[51]
Chelsea 2016[40]
Dearborn Heights 2006[48]
Delhi Township October 1, 2013[52]
Delta Township October 21, 2013[53]
Detroit (2008) 1979[45][43][48]
Douglas 1995[48]
East Grand Rapids March 26, 2015[54]
East Lansing [note 2] (2005)[43] (1986)[44] March 7, 1972[55]
Farmington Hills 2014[40]
Fenton June 9, 2014[56][57]
Ferndale [note 3] 2006[45][43][48]
Flint [note 4] 1990[48]
Grand Ledge 2000[48]
Grand Rapids 1994[43][48]
Howell 2016[40]
Huntington Woods [note 5] 2001[48]
Jackson 2017[40]
Kalamazoo [note 6] 2009[43][48]
Kalamazoo Township July 22, 2013[61]
Lake Orion 2016[62]
Lansing 2006[45][43][48]
Lathrup Village February 24, 2014[63]
Linden September 12, 2013[64]
Marquette December 14, 2015[65]
Meridian Township July 10, 2013[66]
Mount Pleasant July 9, 2012[67][59][68][69]
Muskegon March 12, 2012[59][70]
Oshtemo Township August 27, 2013[71]
Pleasant Ridge [note 7] March 4, 2013[58]
Portage 2016[40]
Royal Oak [note 8] November 5, 2013[72]
Saginaw 1984[48]
Saint Joseph March 11, 2019[73]
Saline March 5, 2018[74]
Saugatuck 2007[43][48]
Saugatuck Township 2007[48]
Southfield 2015[40]
Traverse City [note 9] October 4, 2010[75]
Trenton November 12, 2013[77]
Union Township October 11, 2012[59][67]
Wayland 2015[40]
Ypsilanti 1997[43][48]

Notes:

  1. While East Lansing was the first community in the United States to enact civil rights protections that included sexual orientation, Ann Arbor was the first to pass comprehensive protections that included employment, housing, and public accommodations.[42]
  2. East Lansing was the first community in the United States to enact civil rights protections that included sexual orientation.[55]
  3. Ferndale voters passed the measure in 2006 after three voter referendums since the time it was first proposed in 1991.[58]
  4. An ordinance expanding its non-discrimination ordinance was passed in 2012. However, when the Emergency Financial Manager (EFM) law was voted down statewide, all ordinances enacted in Flint by the EMF were removed, including the non-discrimination ordinance. Their previous non-discrimination ordinance is still in effect, but the gender identity component is not.[59]
  5. In 2001, the City Council approved the measure, but opponents gathered enough signatures to force a citywide ballot question on the ordinance. In November 2001, voters then approved the measure, 1,982 to 896.[60]
  6. The ordinance was first passed in December 2008. It was repealed in January 2009 when opponents submitted petitions to force a public vote. The city drafted language that offered a compromise, including the exemption for religious organizations. The City Council voted unanimously in June 2009 to pass it. Groups opposed to including sexual orientation and gender identity in the ordinance again submitted petitions — 1,273 signatures were needed, 2,088 were gathered. On November 4, 2009, the ordinance was upheld with 7,671 people voting “yes” and 4,731 voting “no” — 60% to 37%.[48]
  7. On March 4, 2013 the Pleasant Ridge City Commission passed a human rights ordinance in a 6–1 vote which included sexual orientation. On April 9, 2013, the Commission voted unanimously to also prohibits biases based on HIV status and gender identity.[58]
  8. In March 2013, the Royal Oak City Commission voted 6-1 to enact a human rights ordinance inclusive of gender identity and sexual orientation. Opponents collected more than 1,000 petition signatures to override the commission’s vote and put the issue before Royal Oak voters in the November 2013 election. Royal Oak voters rejected a similar human rights ordinance in 2001 by a 2-1 margin, but passed the ordinance in 2013 by a margin of 6,654 votes for and 5,670 votes against the measure.[72]
  9. On October 4, 2011, the Traverse City Commission approved the measure to prevent discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity.[75] Opponents of the law collected signatures to require a referendum. On November 8, 2011, Traverse City residents voted 63% to 37% in favor of retaining the city ordinance.[76]

Hate crime law

Since 1992, sexual orientation has been recognized for data collection about hate crimes in Michigan.[78]

Conversion therapy
See also: List of U.S. jurisdictions banning conversion therapy

In June 2019, Huntington Woods City Commission passed an ordinance, in a unanimous 5-0 vote, banning conversion therapy in a first reading.[79] As of June 2019, there is no statewide ban on conversion therapy in Michigan.

Gender identity and expression

In order for transgender people to change their legal gender on their birth certificates in Michigan, they must undergo sex reassignment surgery, a name change and receive a medical affidavit from a physician.[80]

Driver’s licenses

In November 2019, Michigan implemented a new government software system to change an individuals gender or sex on drivers licenses and I.D.s within the state - by both a signed statutory declaration and a fee.[81][82] In January 2020 it was announced possibly from 2021, driver licences within Michigan will include gender X.[83]

Public opinion

A 2017 Public Religion Research Institute poll found that 63% of Michigan residents supported same-sex marriage, while 29% were opposed and 8% were unsure.[2] Additionally, 70% supported an anti-discrimination law covering sexual orientation and gender identity. 22% were opposed. The PRRI also found that 62% were against allowing public businesses to refuse to serve LGBT people due to religious beliefs, while 31% supported such religiously-based refusals.

Summary table
Same-sex sexual activity legal (Since 2003)[84]
Equal age of consent (16) (Since 2003) [84]
Anti-discrimination laws in all areas (Sexual orientation since and gender identity since 2019 )
Same-sex marriages (Since 2015)
Recognition of same-sex couples (e.g. civil union) (Since 2004)
Stepchild adoption by same-sex couples
Joint adoption by same-sex couples (In September 2019, a judge within Michigan allowed discrimination against LGBT individuals adopting children within adoption agencies, on the technical legal grounds of "fundamental religious beliefs and freedoms". As with all court cases they are subject to appeal in the future)
Lesbians, gays and bisexuals allowed to serve openly in the military (Since 2011)
Transgender people allowed to serve openly in the military
Right to change legal gender without
Access to IVF for lesbians
Automatic parenthood on birth certificates for children of same-sex couples
Gay and trans panic defense
Conversion therapy banned on minors
Third gender option (Since 2019,Michigan implemented a new government software system to change an individuals gender or sex on drivers licenses and I.D.s within the state - by both a signed statutory declaration and a fee.In January 2020 it was announced possibly from 2021, driver licences within Michigan will include gender X)
LGBT anti-bullying law in schools and colleges
LGBT-inclusive history education required to be taught in schools
LGBT-inclusive sex education required to be taught in schools
Surrogacy access for gay male couples
MSMs allowed to donate blood / (1 year deferral period)

See also

References
  1. "Motor City Pride".
  2. "PRRI – American Values Atlas". ava.prri.org.
  3. Howard, Drew. "Bill Banning Conversion Therapy in Washington State Enters Final Phase".
  4. "Election 2004 Ballot Measures". CNN. Retrieved November 30, 2006.
  5. "Judge strikes down Michigan ban on gay marriage; state asks for a stay". Detroit Free Press. March 22, 2014. Retrieved March 22, 2014.
  6. "Michigan's 1st Gay Marriage License Issued". ABC News. March 22, 2014. Retrieved March 22, 2014.
  7. Egan, Paul (March 22, 2014). "Michigan gay marriages could fall into legal limbo". USA Today. Retrieved March 23, 2014.
  8. "Court indefinitely suspends overturn of gay marriage ban in Michigan". Daily News. Associated Press. March 25, 2014. Retrieved March 30, 2014.
  9. Jonathan Oosting. "Attorney General Eric Holder: Federal government will recognize same-sex marriages in Michigan". Mlive.com. Retrieved June 29, 2014.
  10. Eckholm, Erik. "Court Upholds Four States' Bans on Same-Sex Marriage". Retrieved November 6, 2014.
  11. White, Ed (June 28, 2013). "Mich. ban on domestic partner benefits blocked". Pioneer Press. Retrieved February 18, 2014.
  12. Lederman, Marty (July 1, 2013). "After Windsor: Michigan same-sex partners benefits suit advances". SCOTUSblog. Retrieved July 2, 2013.
  13. Johnson, Chris (November 12, 2014). "Court rules against Michigan ban on DP benefits". Washington Blade. Retrieved November 12, 2014.
  14. "Arkansas Supreme Court strikes down adoption ban". Kenn News Service. April 7, 2011. Retrieved May 8, 2013.
  15. "Michigan adoption ban for unmarried couples being challenged in court today". Detroit News. August 29, 2012. Retrieved September 7, 2012.
  16. Ferretti, Christine (September 7, 2012). "Hazel Park women challenge Michigan's marriage amendment". Detroit News. Archived from the original on October 7, 2012. Retrieved September 7, 2012.
  17. "ACLU Praises Appeals Court Decision on Same-Sex Second-Parent Adoption, December 13, 2012". ACLU. Retrieved September 30, 2014. The Michigan Appeals Court ruled this week that family court judges have jurisdiction to grant second-parent adoptions to same-sex couples...
  19. "Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act: Public Act 453 of 1976" (PDF). Legislative Council, State of Michigan. Retrieved December 8, 2014.
  20. Gubbins, Roberta M. (September 17, 2012). "Legal Milestone honors Elliot-Larsen Civil Rights Act". Oakland County Legal News. Retrieved December 8, 2014.
  21. Skubick, Tim (November 23, 2014). "Who is Elliott and who is Larsen? Groundbreakers, that's who". MLive.com. Retrieved December 9, 2014.
  22. Wolfe, Dawn (February 24, 2005). "Pro-LGBT bills to be introduced, Kolb seeking co-sponsors". Between The Lines. Lansing, MI. Retrieved December 9, 2014.
  23. Miller, Justin (February 14, 2006). "Once promising, Kolb's LGBT bills fizzle". The Michigan Daily. Retrieved December 9, 2014.
  24. Oosting, Jonathan (December 3, 2014). "'Historic' gay rights hearing ends without vote on Michigan anti-discrimination proposals". MLive.com. Retrieved December 9, 2014.
  25. "EXECUTIVE DIRECTIVE No. 2003-24". Michigan.gov. June 1, 2005. Retrieved June 29, 2014.
  26. Press, The Associated (November 23, 2007). "Michigan Broadens Discrimination Protections" – via NYTimes.com.
  27. "Senate Bill 0252 (2013)". Legislature.mi.gov. Retrieved June 29, 2014.
  28. "Harbor Dredging Law Includes LGBT Protections". ipr.interlochen.org. March 29, 2013. Archived from the original on October 16, 2013. Retrieved June 2, 2013.
  29. Metzger, Ianthe (January 8, 2019). "Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer Signs Executive Directive Protecting LGBTQ State Employees". Human Rights Campaign.
  30. Eggert, David (September 17, 2017). "Michigan Civil Rights Commission may declare LGBT discrimination unlawful". Detroit Free Press.
  31. "Michigan board: Civil rights law bars LGBT discrimination". WZZM.
  32. Michigan just banned anti-LGBTQ discrimination in a landmark decision, LGBTQ Nation, May 22, 2018
  33. Michigan attorney general: LGBTQ people not protected by state civil rights law, MetroWeekly, July 24, 2018
  34. Commission spurns Schuette opinion, plans to protect LGBT rights, MLive.com, July 23, 2018
  35. "Opinion: Bill Schuette's LGBTQ opinion is shameful display of bigotry". Detroit Free Press. July 24, 2018.
  36. "Businesses Can't Fire Trans Employees for Religious Reasons, Federal Appeals Court Rules in Landmark Decision". Slate. March 7, 2018.
  37. "Cities with Legal Protection". Equality Michigan. Archived from the original on January 23, 2012. Retrieved October 22, 2013.
  38. Stevenson, Jan (February 27, 2014). "Wayne County Adds LGBT Protections". Between the Lines. Retrieved March 3, 2014.
  39. "33rd Michigan City Adds LGBT Nondiscrimination Protections". Unity Michigan. June 10, 2014. Retrieved June 16, 2014.
  40. Two Michigan Cities Pass Nondiscrimination Ordinances
  41. Ordinance #2015-04
  42. Cosentino, Lawrence (March 7, 2012). "A gay rights first". lansingcitypulse.com. Retrieved June 7, 2016.
  43. "Cities and Counties with Non-Discrimination Ordinances that Include Gender Identity". Human Rights Campaign. Retrieved October 22, 2013.
  44. Michigan Department of Civil Rights (January 28, 2013). "MDCR Report on LGBT Inclusion under Michigan Law With Recommendations for Action" (PDF). michigan.gov. Retrieved June 7, 2016.
  45. "Municipal Equality Index". Human Rights Campaign. Retrieved October 22, 2013.
  46. "Battle Creek, Mich., bars anti-LGBT discrimination in housing, employment". LGBTQ Nation. Battle Creek, MI. September 6, 2013. Retrieved October 23, 2013.
  47. Munguia, Jesi (April 19, 2016). "Bay City Officials Approve Anti-Discrimination Ordinance". 9&10 News.
  48. Manwell, Annette (June 18, 2011). "Holland could face long battle over human rights changes". The Holland Sentinel. Retrieved January 2, 2013.
  49. "City of Buchanan Commission Minutes: June 10, 2019". CityofBuchanan.com. Retrieved June 10, 2019.
  50. "Cadillac passes anti-discrimination law". Cadillac News. Retrieved September 18, 2018.
  51. "Canton board adopts equal rights rules, draws praise". Hometownlife.com. Retrieved June 29, 2014.
  52. Kangas, Will (October 4, 2013). "Delhi Township OKs law banning discrimination based on sexual preference". Lansing State Journal. Delhi Township, Michigan. Retrieved October 23, 2013.
  53. Khalil, Joe (October 21, 2013). "Anti-Discriminatory Ordinance Passes in Delta Township". Delta Township, Michigan: WLNS-TV. Retrieved October 23, 2013.
  54. "East Grand Rapids adds LGBT clause to law". Associated Press. Detroit Free Press. March 17, 2015.
  55. Millich, Gretchen (March 6, 2012). "East Lansing Marks 40th Anniversary of Gay Rights Ordinance". WKAR-FM. Retrieved October 23, 2013.
  56. "Fenton bans discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity". mlive.com. June 9, 2014. Retrieved June 10, 2014.
  57. MLive.com File Photo (June 5, 2014). "Fenton considers ordinance banning discrimination based on sexual orientation". Mlive.com. Retrieved June 29, 2014.
  58. Kavanaugh, Catherine (September 3, 2013). "Pleasant Ridge human rights law takes effect". The Oakland Press. Retrieved October 23, 2013.
  59. Proxmire, Crystal A. (January 10, 2013). "Non Discrimination Ordinances Spread Equality City by City". Between the Lines. Retrieved January 14, 2013.
  60. T. Alexander Smith, Raymond Tatalovich (2003). Cultures at War: Moral Conflicts in Western Democracies. Toronto, Ontario: University of Toronto Press. p. 182. ISBN 1551113341.
  61. Monacelli, Emily (July 22, 2013). "Non-discrimination ordinance passed in 6-0 vote by Kalamazoo Township board". Kalamazoo Gazette. Kalamazoo Township, Michigan. Retrieved October 23, 2013.
  62. Thelen, Georgia (September 29, 2016). "Lake Orion Village votes 4-3 in favor of passing LGBTQ Ordinance". The Lake Orion Review.
  63. "Lathrup Village adds gay rights to anti-bias law". San Francisco Chronicle. Associated Press. February 25, 2014. Retrieved March 3, 2014.
  64. Aldridge, Chris (September 12, 2013). "Linden enacts ordinance protecting residents from discrimination based on sexual orientation, gender identity". MLive.com. Linden, MI. Retrieved October 23, 2013.
  65. Walton, Nicole (December 15, 2015). "Anti-discrimination ordinance passed by Marquette City Commission". wnmufm.org. Retrieved December 21, 2015.
  66. "Meridian Township Adopts Inclusive Policies". Between the Lines. July 18, 2013. Retrieved October 23, 2013.
  67. "Union Township adopts 'human rights' law". The Morning Sun. October 12, 2012. Retrieved January 2, 2013.
  68. "Ordinance No. 973" (PDF). City of Mount Pleasant. Retrieved August 20, 2012. The City intends that no individual be denied the equal protection of the laws; nor shall any person be denied the enjoyment of his or her civil rights or be discriminated against because of his or her [...] sexual orientation or gender identity.
  69. Pomber, Phil (July 10, 2012). "Mount Pleasant approves anti-discrimination law at Monday City Commission meeting". Central Michigan Life. Retrieved October 23, 2013.
  70. Alexander, Dave (March 12, 2012). "Lesbian-gay anti-discrimination policy accepted by Muskegon City Commission". Michigan Live LLC. Retrieved March 13, 2012.
  71. Wilcox, Fran (August 27, 2013). "Oshtemo Township adopts non-discrimination ordinance". The Kalamazoo Gazette. Oshtemo Township, Michigan. Retrieved October 23, 2013.
  72. AlHajal, Khalil (November 5, 2013). "Gay rights ordinance passes in Royal Oak". Michigan Live. Retrieved December 7, 2013.
  73. Matuszak, John (March 12, 2019). "St. Joseph approves LGBT non-discrimination ordinance". The Herald-Palladium. Saint Joseph, Michigan. Retrieved March 12, 2019.
  74. City of Saline Passes Non Discrimination Ordinance
  75. Bukowski, Art (October 5, 2010). "TC approves anti-discrimination ordinance". Traverse City Record-Eagle. Traverse City, Michigan. Retrieved October 23, 2013.
  76. "Traverse City voters approve gay-rights law". The Morning Sun. Traverse City, Michigan. Associated Press. April 27, 2012. Retrieved October 23, 2013.
  77. "Ordinance 777" (PDF). City of Trenton. Retrieved February 3, 2014.
  78. "Section 28.257a". Legislature.mi.gov. March 30, 1992. Retrieved June 29, 2014.
  79. "Huntington Woods Bans Gay Conversion Therapy". CBS Detroit. Huntington Woods. June 5, 2019.
  80. Michigan National Center for Transgender Equality
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.