Extreme trans-Neptunian object

An extreme trans-Neptunian object (ETNO) is a minor planet and trans-Neptunian object, orbiting the Sun well beyond Neptune (30 AU) in the outermost region of the Solar System. An ETNO has a large semi-major axis of at least 150–250 AU.[1][2] Its orbit is much less affected by the known giant planets than all other known trans-Neptunian objects. They may, however, be influenced by gravitational interactions with a hypothetical Planet Nine, shepherding these objects into similar types of orbits.[1]

The chart above plots trans-Neptunian objects with a perihelion beyond Neptune (30 AU). While regular TNOs are located in the bottom left of the plot, an ETNO has a semi-major axis greater than 150–250 AU. They can be grouped by their perihelia into three distinct populations:[1]   scattered ETNOs or ESDOs (38–45 AU)
  detached ETNOs or EDDOs (40–45 to 50–60 AU)
  Sednoids or inner Oort cloud objects (beyond 50–60 AU)

ETNOs can be divided into three different subgroups. The scattered ETNOs (or extreme scattered disc objects, ESDOs) have perihelia around 38–45 AU and an exceptionally high eccentricity of more than 0.85. As with the regular scattered disc objects, they were likely formed as result of gravitational scattering by Neptune and still interact with the giant planets. The detached ETNOs (or extreme detached disc objects, EDDOs), with perihelia approximately between 40–45 and 50–60 AU, are less affected by Neptune than the scattered ETNOS, but are still relatively close to Neptune. The sednoid or inner Oort cloud objects, with perihelia beyond 50–60 AU, are too far from Neptune to be strongly influenced by it.[1]

Sednoids

Among the extreme trans-Neptunian objects are the sednoids, three objects with an outstandingly high perihelion: Sedna, 2012 VP113, and Leleākūhonua. Sedna and 2012 VP113 are distant detached objects with perihelia greater than 70 AU. Their high perihelia keep them at a sufficient distance to avoid significant gravitational perturbations from Neptune. Previous explanations for the high perihelion of Sedna include a close encounter with an unknown planet on a distant orbit and a distant encounter with a random star or a member of the Sun's birth cluster that passed near the Solar System.[3][4][5]

Most distant objects from the Sun

Trujillo and Sheppard discoveries

Extreme trans-Neptunian objects discovered by astronomers Chad Trujillo and Scott S. Sheppard include:

  • 2013 FT28, Longitude of perihelion aligned with Planet Nine, but well within the proposed orbit of Planet Nine, where computer modeling suggests it would be safe from gravitational kicks.[6]
  • 2014 SR349, appears to be anti-aligned with Planet Nine.[6]
  • 2014 FE72, an object with an orbit so extreme that it reaches about 3,000 AU from the Sun in a massively-elongated ellipse – at this distance its orbit is influenced by the galactic tide and other stars.[7][8][9][10]

Outer Solar System Origins Survey

The Outer Solar System Origins Survey has discovered more extreme trans-Neptunian objects, including:[11]

  • 2013 SY99, which has a lower inclination than many of the objects, and which was discussed by Michele Bannister at a March 2016 lecture hosted by the SETI Institute and later at an October 2016 AAS conference.[12][13]
  • 2015 KG163, which has an orientation similar to 2013 FT28 but has a larger semi-major axis that may result in its orbit crossing Planet Nine's.
  • 2015 RX245, which fits with the other anti-aligned objects.
  • 2015 GT50, which is in neither the anti-aligned nor the aligned groups; instead, its orbit's orientation is at a right angle to that of the proposed Planet Nine. Its argument of perihelion is also outside the cluster of arguments of perihelion.

Since early 2016, ten more extreme trans-Neptunian objects have been discovered with orbits that have a perihelion greater than 30 AU and a semi-major axis greater than 250 AU bringing the total to sixteen (see table below for a complete list). Most eTNOs have perihelia significantly beyond Neptune, which orbits 30 AU from the Sun.[14][15] Generally, TNOs with perihelia smaller than 36 AU experience strong encounters with Neptune.[16][17] Most of the eTNOs are relatively small, but currently relatively bright because they are near their closest distance to the Sun in their elliptical orbits. These are also included in the orbital diagrams and tables below.

The extreme trans-Neptunian object orbits
Close up view of 13 TNO current positions
6 original and 10 additional TNO object orbits with current positions near their perihelion in purple

Extreme trans-Neptunian objects with perihelion greater than 30 AU and a semi-major axis greater than 250 AU[18][19]
Object Orbit Orbital plane Body
Stability
[20]
Barycentric[upper-alpha 1]
Orbital
period

(years)
Barycentric
Semimajor
axis
(AU)
Perihelion
(AU)
Barycentric
Aphelion
(AU)
Current
distance
from
Sun
(AU)
Eccent. Argum.
peri

ω (°)
inclin.
i (°)
Longitude of Hv Current
mag.
Diameter
(km)
Ascending
node

☊ or Ω (°)
Perihelion
ϖ=ω+Ω (°)
SednaStable11,40050776.0493685.50.85311.511.9144.596.01.520.91,000
2004 VN112Stable5,90032747.3260747.70.85327.125.666.033.16.523.3200
2007 TG422Unstable11,30050335.5797037.30.93285.718.6112.938.66.222.0200
LeleākūhonuaStable40,0001,20064.942,30077.70.94118.211.7300.859.05.324.3110
2010 GB174Stable6,60035148.7665471.20.87347.821.5130.6118.46.525.1200
2012 VP113Stable4,30026680.2744183.50.69292.824.190.823.64.023.3600
2013 FT28Metastable5,05029543.6054657.00.8640.217.3217.8258.0 (*)6.724.4200
2013 RF98Unstable6,90036436.1069036.80.90311.829.667.619.48.724.470
2013 RA109?9,9004614687847.10.90263.012.4104.87.86.123.0200
2013 SY99Metastable19,70073049.911,41060.30.9332.44.229.561.96.724.5250
2013 SL102?5,59031538.159239.10.88265.36.594.6359.9 (*)7.023.1140
2014 FE72Unstable66,0001,60036.313,20061.50.98134.420.6336.8111.26.124.0200
2014 SR349Stable5,16029947.5754956.30.84341.418.034.816.26.624.2200
2014 WB556?4,90029042.7153646.50.85235.324.2115.0350.3 (*)7.324.1150
2015 BP519[23]?9,50044935.2586352.70.92348.154.1135.2123.34.321.5550[24]
2015 GT50Unstable5,51031038.4558041.70.89129.28.846.1175.3 (*)8.524.980
2015 KG163Unstable17,73068040.511,32040.80.9532.014.0219.1251.1 (*)8.124.3100
2015 RX245Metastable8,92043045.4881561.40.8965.412.28.674.06.224.2250
uo5m93[25]?4,76028339.4852641.70.8643.36.8165.9209.3 (*)8.925.070?
2018 VM35?4,50027044.6950454.90.84303.58.5192.4135.9 (*)7.725.0140
Ideal elements
under hypothesis
>250>30>0.510~302~120
Hypothesized
Planet Nine
8,000-22,000400-800~200~1,000~1,000?0.2-0.5~15015-2591±15241±15>22.5~40,000
  • (*) longitude of perihelion, ϖ, outside expected range;
  •    are the objects included in the original study by Trujillo and Sheppard (2014).[26]
  •    has been added in the 2016 study by Brown and Batygin.[16][27][28]
  • All other objects have been announced later.

The most extreme case is that of 2015 BP519, nicknamed Caju, which has both the highest inclination[29] and the farthest nodal distance; these properties make it a probable outlier within this population.[2]

Notes

  1. Given the orbital eccentricity of these objects, different epochs can generate quite different heliocentric unperturbed two-body best-fit solutions to the semi-major axis and orbital period. For objects at such high eccentricity, the Sun's barycenter is more stable than heliocentric values. Barycentric values better account for the changing position of Jupiter over Jupiter's 12 year orbit. As an example, 2007 TG422 has an epoch 2012 heliocentric period of ~13,500 years,[21] yet an epoch 2017 heliocentric period of ~10,400 years.[22] The barycentric solution is a much more stable ~11,300 years.

References

  1. Brown, Michael E.; Trujillo, Chadwick; Rabinowitz, David (2018). "A New High Perihelion Inner Oort Cloud Object". arXiv:1810.00013 [astro-ph.EP].
  2. de la Fuente Marcos, Carlos; de la Fuente Marcos, Raúl (12 September 2018). "A Fruit of a Different Kind: 2015 BP519 as an Outlier among the Extreme Trans-Neptunian Objects". Research Notes of the AAS. 2 (3): 167. arXiv:1809.02571. Bibcode:2018RNAAS...2c.167D. doi:10.3847/2515-5172/aadfec.
  3. Wall, Mike (24 August 2011). "A Conversation With Pluto's Killer: Q & A With Astronomer Mike Brown". Space.com. Retrieved 7 February 2016.
  4. Brown, Michael E.; Trujillo, Chadwick; Rabinowitz, David (2004). "Discovery of a Candidate Inner Oort Cloud Planetoid". The Astrophysical Journal. 617 (1): 645–649. arXiv:astro-ph/0404456. Bibcode:2004ApJ...617..645B. doi:10.1086/422095.
  5. Brown, Michael E. (28 October 2010). "There's something out there – part 2". Mike Brown's Planets. Retrieved 18 July 2016.
  6. "Objects beyond Neptune provide fresh evidence for Planet Nine". 2016-10-25. The new evidence leaves astronomer Scott Sheppard of the Carnegie Institution for Science in Washington, D.C., "probably 90% sure there's a planet out there." But others say the clues are sparse and unconvincing. "I give it about a 1% chance of turning out to be real," says astronomer JJ Kavelaars, of the Dominion Astrophysical Observatory in Victoria, Canada.
  7. "PLANET 9 SEARCH TURNING UP WEALTH OF NEW OBJECTS". 2016-08-30.
  8. "Extreme New Objects Found At The Edge of The Solar System".
  9. "The Search for Planet Nine: New Finds Boost Case for Distant World".
  10. "HUNT FOR NINTH PLANET REVEALS NEW EXTREMELY DISTANT SOLAR SYSTEM OBJECTS". 2016-08-29.
  11. Shankman, Cory; et al. (2017). "OSSOS VI. Striking Biases in the detection of large semimajor axis Trans-Neptunian Objects". The Astronomical Journal. 154 (4): 50. arXiv:1706.05348. Bibcode:2017AJ....154...50S. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aa7aed. hdl:10150/625487.
  12. SETI Institute (18 March 2016). "Exploring the outer Solar System: now in vivid colour - Michele Bannister (SETI Talks)". YouTube. 28:17. Retrieved 18 July 2016.
  13. Bannister, Michele T.; et al. (2016). "A new high-perihelion a ~700 AU object in the distant Solar System". American Astronomical Society, DPS Meeting #48, Id. 113.08. 48: 113.08. Bibcode:2016DPS....4811308B.
  14. Hand, Eric (20 January 2016). "Astronomers say a Neptune-sized planet lurks beyond Pluto". Science. doi:10.1126/science.aae0237. Retrieved 20 January 2016.
  15. Grush, Loren (20 January 2016). "Our solar system may have a ninth planet after all — but not all evidence is in (We still haven't seen it yet)". The Verge. Retrieved 18 July 2016. The statistics do sound promising, at first. The researchers say there's a 1 in 15,000 chance that the movements of these objects are coincidental and don't indicate a planetary presence at all. ... 'When we usually consider something as clinched and air tight, it usually has odds with a much lower probability of failure than what they have,' says Sara Seager, a planetary scientist at MIT. For a study to be a slam dunk, the odds of failure are usually 1 in 1,744,278 . ... But researchers often publish before they get the slam-dunk odds, in order to avoid getting scooped by a competing team, Seager says. Most outside experts agree that the researchers' models are strong. And Neptune was originally detected in a similar fashion — by researching observed anomalies in the movement of Uranus. Additionally, the idea of a large planet at such a distance from the Sun isn't actually that unlikely, according to Bruce Macintosh, a planetary scientist at Stanford University.
  16. Batygin, Konstantin; Brown, Michael E. (2016). "Evidence for a distant giant planet in the Solar system". The Astronomical Journal. 151 (2): 22. arXiv:1601.05438. Bibcode:2016AJ....151...22B. doi:10.3847/0004-6256/151/2/22.
  17. Koponyás, Barbara (10 April 2010). "Near-Earth asteroids and the Kozai mechanism" (PDF). 5th Austrian-Hungarian Workshop in Vienna. Retrieved 18 July 2016.
  18. Horizons output. "Barycentric Osculating Orbital Elements". Retrieved 4 February 2020. (Solution using the Solar System Barycenter and barycentric coordinates. (Type the target body's name, then select Ephemeris Type:Elements and Center:@0) In the second pane "PR=" can be found, which gives the orbital period in days (For Sedna as an example, the value 4.16E+06 is displayed, which is ~11400 Julian years).
  19. "MPC list of q > 30 and a > 250". Minor Planet Center. Retrieved 5 February 2020.
  20. Relative to hypothetical Planet Nine, Batygin, Konstantin; Adams, Fred C.; Brown, Michael E.; Becker, Juliette C. "The Planet Nine Hypothesis". arXiv:1902.10103. Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  21. "JPL Small-Body Database Browser". 13 December 2012. Archived from the original on 13 December 2012.
  22. Chamberlin, Alan. "JPL Small-Body Database Browser". ssd.jpl.nasa.gov.
  23. Becker, Juliette (2017). Evaluating the Dynamical Stability of Outer Solar System Objects in the Presence of Planet Nine. DPS49. American Astronomical Society. Retrieved 14 March 2018.
  24. Lovett, Richard A. (16 December 2017). "The hidden hand - Could a bizarre hidden planet be manipulating the solar system". New Scientist International. No. 3156. p. 41. Retrieved 14 March 2018.
  25. Bannister, Michelle T.; et al. (2018). "OSSOS. VII. 800+ Trans-Neptunian Objects — The complete data release". The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. 236 (1): 18. arXiv:1805.11740. Bibcode:2018ApJS..236...18B. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aab77a. hdl:10150/628551.
  26. Trujillo, Chadwick A.; Sheppard, Scott S. (2014). "A Sedna-like body with a perihelion of 80 astronomical units" (PDF). Nature. 507 (7493): 471–474. Bibcode:2014Natur.507..471T. doi:10.1038/nature13156. PMID 24670765. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-12-16. Retrieved 2018-12-12.
  27. "Where is Planet Nine?". The Search for Planet Nine (Blog). 20 January 2016. Archived from the original on 30 January 2016.
  28. Witze, Alexandra (2016). "Evidence grows for giant planet on fringes of Solar System". Nature. 529 (7586): 266–7. Bibcode:2016Natur.529..266W. doi:10.1038/529266a. PMID 26791699.
  29. Becker, J. C.; et al. (DES Collaboration) (2018). "Discovery and Dynamical Analysis of an Extreme Trans-Neptunian Object with a High Orbital Inclination". The Astronomical Journal. 156 (2): 81. arXiv:1805.05355. Bibcode:2018AJ....156...81B. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aad042.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.