Xenopus

Xenopus
Xenopus laevis
Scientific classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Amphibia
Order: Anura
Family: Pipidae
Subfamily: Xenopodinae
Genus: Xenopus
Wagler, 1827
Species

See text

Xenopus (/ˈzɛnəpəs/[1][2]) (Gk., ξενος, xenos=strange, πους, pous=foot, commonly known as the clawed frog) is a genus of highly aquatic frogs native to sub-Saharan Africa. Twenty species are currently described within it. The two best-known species of this genus are Xenopus laevis and Xenopus tropicalis, which are commonly studied as model organisms for developmental biology, cell biology, toxicology, neuroscience and for modelling human disease and birth defects.[3][4]

The genus is also known for its polyploidy, with some species having up to 12 sets of chromosomes.

Characteristics

Description

All species of Xenopus have flattened, somewhat egg-shaped and streamlined bodies, and very slippery skin (because of a protective mucus covering).[5] The frog's skin is smooth, but with a lateral line sensory organ that has a stitch-like appearance. The frogs are all excellent swimmers and have powerful, fully webbed toes, though the fingers lack webbing. Three of the toes on each foot have conspicuous black claws.

The frog's eyes are on top of the head, looking upwards. The pupils are circular. They have no moveable eyelids, tongues (rather it is completely attached to the floor of the mouth[5]) or eardrums (similarly to Pipa pipa, the common Suriname toad[6]).[7]

Unlike most amphibians, they have no haptoglobin in their blood.[7]

Behaviour

Xenopus species are entirely aquatic, though they have been observed migrating on land to nearby bodies of water during times of drought or in heavy rain. They are usually found in lakes, rivers, swamps, potholes in streams, and man-made reservoirs.[7]

Adult frogs are usually both predators and scavengers, and since their tongues are unusable, the frogs use their small fore limbs to aid in the feeding process. Since they also lack vocal sacs, they make clicks (brief pulses of sound) underwater (again similar to Pipa pipa).[6] Males establish a hierarchy of social dominance in which primarily one male has the right to make the advertisement call.[8] The females of many species produce a release call, and Xenopus laevis females produce an additional call when sexually receptive and soon to lay eggs.[9] The Xenopus species are also active during the twilight (or crepuscular) hours.[7]

During breeding season, the males develop ridge-like nuptial pads (black in color) on their fingers to aid in grasping the female. The frogs' mating embrace is inguinal, meaning the male grasps the female around her waist.[7]

Species

A Xenopus laevis female with a batch of freshly laid eggs and a Xenopus tropicalis male

Model organism for biomedical research

Like many other anurans, they are often used in laboratory as research subjects.[5] Xenopus embryos and eggs are a popular model system for a wide variety of biological studies.[3][4] This animal is used because of its powerful combination of experimental tractability and close evolutionary relationship with humans, at least compared to many model organisms.[3][4]

Xenopus has long been an important tool for in vivo studies in molecular, cell, and developmental biology of vertebrate animals.[10] However, the wide breadth of Xenopus research stems from the additional fact that cell-free extracts made from Xenopus are a premier in vitro system for studies of fundamental aspects of cell and molecular biology. Thus, Xenopus is the only vertebrate model system that allows for high-throughput in vivo analyses of gene function and high-throughput biochemistry. Furthermore, Xenopus oocytes are a leading system for studies of ion transport and channel physiology.[3] Xenopus is also a unique system for analyses of genome evolution and whole genome duplication in vertebrates,[11] as different Xenopus species form a ploidy series formed by interspecific hybridization.[12]

Xenbase [13] is the Model Organism Database (MOD) for both Xenopus laevis and Xenopus tropicalis.[14]

In in the 1931 Lancelot Hogben noted that Xenopus laevis females ovulated when injected with the urine of pregnant women[15]. This led to a pregnancy test that was later refined by South African researchers Hillel Abbe Shapiro and Harry Zwarenstein[16]. A female Xenopus frog injected with a woman's urine was put in a jar with a little water. If eggs were in the water a day later it meant the woman was pregnant. Four years after the first Xenopus test, Zwarenstein's colleague, Dr Louis Bosman, reported that the test was accurate in more than 99% of cases.[17] From the 1930s to the 1950s, thousands of frogs were exported across the world for use in these pregnancy tests. [18]

Investigation of human disease genes

All modes of Xenopus research (embryos, cell-free extracts, and oocytes) are commonly used in direct studies of human disease genes and to study the basic science underlying initiation and progression of cancer.[19] Xenopus embryos for in vivo studies of human disease gene function: Xenopus embryos are large and easily manipulated, and moreover, thousands of embryos can be obtained in a single day. Indeed, Xenopus was the first vertebrate animal for which methods were developed to allow rapid analysis of gene function using misexpression (by mRNA injection [20]). Injection of mRNA in Xenopus that led to the cloning of interferon.[21] Moreover, the use of morpholino-antisense oligonucleotides for gene knockdowns in vertebrate embryos, which is now widely used, was first developed by Janet Heasman using Xenopus.[22]

In recent years, these approaches have played in important role in studies of human disease genes. The mechanism of action for several genes mutated in human cystic kidney disorders (e.g. nephronophthisis) have been extensively studied in Xenopus embryos, shedding new light on the link between these disorders, ciliogenesis and Wnt signaling.[23] Xenopus embryos have also provided a rapid test bed for validating newly discovered disease genes. For example, studies in Xenopus confirmed and elucidated the role of PYCR1 in cutis laxa with progeroid features.[24]

Transgenic Xenopus for studying transcriptional regulation of human disease genes: Xenopus embryos develop rapidly, so transgenesis in Xenopus is a rapid and effective method for analyzing genomic regulatory sequences. In a recent study, mutations in the SMAD7 locus were revealed to associate with human colorectal cancer. The mutations lay in conserved, but noncoding sequences, suggesting these mutations impacted the patterns of SMAD7 transcription. To test this hypothesis, the authors used Xenopus transgenesis, and revealed this genomic region drove expression of GFP in the hindgut. Moreover, transgenics made with the mutant version of this region displayed substantially less expression in the hindgut.[25]

Xenopus cell-free extracts for biochemical studies of proteins encoded by human disease genes: A unique advantage of the Xenopus system is that cytosolic extracts contain both soluble cytoplasmic and nuclear proteins (including chromatin proteins). This is in contrast to cellular extracts prepared from somatic cells with already distinct cellular compartments. Xenopus egg extracts have provided numerous insights into the basic biology of cells with particular impact on cell division and the DNA transactions associated with it (see below).

Studies in Xenopus egg extracts have also yielded critical insights into the mechanism of action of human disease genes associated with genetic instability and elevated cancer risk, such as ataxia telangiectasia, BRCA1 inherited breast and ovarian cancer, Nbs1 Nijmegen breakage syndrome, RecQL4 Rothmund-Thomson syndrome, c-Myc oncogene and FANC proteins (Fanconi anemia).[26][27][28][29][30]

Xenopus oocytes for studies of gene expression and channel activity related to human disease: Yet another strength of Xenopus is the ability to rapidly and easily assay the activity of channel and transporter proteins using expression in oocytes. This application has also led to important insights into human disease, including studies related to trypanosome transmission,[31] Epilepsy with ataxia and sensorineural deafness[32] Catastrophic cardiac arrhythmia (Long-QT syndrome)[33] and Megalencephalic leukoencephalopathy.[34]

Gene editing by the CRISPR/CAS system has recently been demonstrated in Xenopus tropicalis[35][36] and Xenopus laevis.[37] This technique is being used to screen the effects of human disease genes in Xenopus and the system is sufficiently efficient to study the effects within the same embryos that have been manipulated.[38]

Investigation of fundamental biological processes

Signal transduction: Xenopus embryos and cell-free extracts are widely used for basic research in signal transduction. In just the last few years, Xenopus embryos have provided crucial insights into the mechanisms of TGF-beta and Wnt signal transduction. For example, Xenopus embryos were used to identify the enzymes that control ubiquitination of Smad4,[39] and to demonstrate direct links between TGF-beta superfamily signaling pathways and other important networks, such as the MAP kinase pathway[40] and the Wnt pathway.[41] Moreover, new methods using egg extracts revealed novel, important targets of the Wnt/GSK3 destruction complex.[42]

Cell division: Xenopus egg extracts have allowed the study of many complicated cellular events in vitro. Because egg cytosol can support successive cycling between mitosis and interphase in vitro, it has been critical to diverse studies of cell division. For example, the small GTPase Ran was first found to regulate interphase nuclear transport, but Xenopus egg extracts revealed the critical role of Ran GTPase in mitosis independent of its role in interphase nuclear transport.[43] Similarly, the cell-free extracts were used to model nuclear envelope assembly from chromatin, revealing the function of RanGTPase in regulating nuclear envelope reassembly after mitosis.[44] More recently, using Xenopus egg extracts, it was possible to demonstrate the mitosis-specific function of the nuclear lamin B in regulating spindle morphogenesis[45] and to identify new proteins that mediate kinetochore attachment to microtubules.[46]

Embryonic development: Xenopus embryos are widely used in developmental biology. A summary of recent advances made by Xenopus research in recent years would include:

  1. Epigenetics of cell fate specification[47] and epigenome reference maps[48]
  2. microRNA in germ layer patterning and eye development[49][50]
  3. Link between Wnt signaling and telomerase[51]
  4. Development of the vasculature[52]
  5. Gut morphogenesis[53]
  6. Contact inhibition and neural crest cell migration[54] and the generation of neural crest from pluripotent blastula cells[55]

DNA replication: Xenopus cell-free extracts also support the synchronous assembly and the activation of origins of DNA replication. They have been instrumental in characterizing the biochemical function of the prereplicative complex, including MCM proteins.[56][57]

DNA damage response: Cell-free extracts have been instrumental to unravel the signaling pathways activated in response to DNA double-strand breaks (ATM), replication fork stalling (ATR) or DNA interstrand crosslinks (FA proteins and ATR). Notably, several mechanisms and components of these signal transduction pathways were first identified in Xenopus.[58][59][60]

Apoptosis: Xenopus oocytes provide a tractable model for biochemical studies of apoptosis. Recently, oocytes were used recently to study the biochemical mechanisms of caspase-2 activation; importantly, this mechanism turns out to be conserved in mammals.[61]

Regenerative medicine: In recent years, tremendous interest in developmental biology has been stoked by the promise of regenerative medicine. Xenopus has played a role here, as well. For example, expression of seven transcription factors in pluripotent Xenopus cells rendered those cells able to develop into functional eyes when implanted into Xenopus embryos, providing potential insights into the repair of retinal degeneration or damage.[62] In a vastly different study, Xenopus embryos was used to study the effects of tissue tension on morphogenesis,[63] an issue that will be critical for in vitro tissue engineering.

Physiology: The directional beating of multiciliated cells is essential to development and homeostasis in the central nervous system, the airway, and the oviduct. The multiciliated cells of the Xenopus epidermis have recently been developed as the first in vivo test-bed for live-cell studies of such ciliated tissues, and these studies have provided important insights into the biomechanical and molecular control of directional beating.[64][65]

Small molecule screens to develop novel therapeutics

Because huge amounts of material are easily obtained, all modalities of Xenopus research are now being used for small-molecule based screens.

Chemical genetics of vascular growth in Xenopus tadpoles: Given the important role of neovascularization in cancer progression, Xenopus embryos were recently used to identify new small molecules inhibitors of blood vessel growth. Notably, compounds identified in Xenopus were effective in mice.[66][67] Notably, frog embryos figured prominently in a study that used evolutionary principles to identify a novel vascular disrupting agent that may have chemotherapeutic potential.[68] That work was featured in the New York Times Science Times [69]

In vivo testing of potential endocrine disruptors in transgenic Xenopus embryos; A high-throughput assay for thyroid disruption has recently been developed using transgenic Xenopus embryos.[70]

Small molecule screens in Xenopus egg extracts: Egg extracts provide ready analysis of molecular biological processes and can rapidly screened. This approach was used to identify novel inhibitors of proteasome-mediated protein degradation and DNA repair enzymes.[71]

Genetic studies

While Xenopus laevis is the most commonly used species for developmental biology studies, genetic studies, especially forward genetic studies, can be complicated by their pseudotetraploid genome. Xenopus tropicalis provides a simpler model for genetic studies, having a diploid genome.

Gene expression knockdown techniques

The expression of genes can be reduced by a variety of means, for example by using antisense oligonucleotides targeting specific mRNA molecules. DNA oligonucleotides complementary to specific mRNA molecules are often chemically modified to improve their stability in vivo. The chemical modifications used for this purpose include phosphorothioate, 2'-O-methyl, morpholino, MEA phosphoramidate and DEED phosphoramidate.[72]

Morpholino oligonucleotides

Morpholino oligos are used in both X. laevis and X. tropicalis to probe the function of a protein by observing the results of eliminating the protein's activity.[72][73] For example, a set of X. tropicalis genes has been screened in this fashion.[74]

Morpholino oligos (MOs) are short, antisense oligos made of modified nucleotides. MOs can knock down gene expression by inhibiting mRNA translation, blocking RNA splicing, or inhibiting miRNA activity and maturation. MOs have proven to be effective knockdown tools in developmental biology experiments and RNA-blocking reagents for cells in culture. MOs do not degrade their RNA targets, but instead act via a steric blocking mechanism RNAseH-independent manner. They remain stable in cells and do not induce immune responses. Microinjection of MOs in early Xenopus embryos can suppress gene expression in a targeted manner.

Like all antisense approaches, different MOs can have different efficacy, and may cause off-target, non-specific effects. Often, several MOs need to be tested to find an effective target sequence. Rigorous controls are used to demonstrate specificity,[73] including:

  • Phenocopy of genetic mutation
  • Verification of reduced protein by western or immunostaining
  • mRNA rescue by adding back a mRNA immune to the MO
  • use of 2 different MOs (translation blocking and splice blocking)
  • injection of control MOs

Xenbase provides a searchable catalog of over 2000 MOs that have been specifically used in Xenopus research. The data is searchable via sequence, gene symbol and various synonyms (as used in different publications).[75] Xenbase maps the MOs to the latest Xenopus genomes in GBrowse, predicts 'off-target' hits, and lists all Xenopus literature in which the morpholino has been published.

References

  1. ↑ "Xenopus". Oxford Dictionaries. Oxford University Press. Retrieved 2016-01-21.
  2. ↑ "Xenopus". Merriam-Webster Dictionary. Retrieved 2016-01-21.
  3. 1 2 3 4 Wallingford, J., Liu, K., and Zheng, Y. 2010. Current Biology v. 20, p. R263-4
  4. 1 2 3 Harland, R.M. and Grainger, R.M. 2011. Trends in Genetics v. 27, p 507-15
  5. 1 2 3 "IACUC Learning Module — Xenopus laevis". University of Arizona. Retrieved 2009-10-11.
  6. 1 2 Roots, Clive. Nocturnal animals. Greenwood Press. p. 19. ISBN 0-313-33546-X.
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 Passmore, N. I. & Carruthers, V. C. (1979). South African Frogs, p.42-43. Witwatersrand University Press, Johannesburg. ISBN 0-85494-525-3.
  8. ↑ Tobias, Martha; Corke, A; Korsh, J; Yin, D; Kelley, DB (2010). "Vocal competition in male Xenopus laevis frogs". Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 64: 1791–1803. doi:10.1007/s00265-010-0991-3. PMC 3064475. PMID 21442049.
  9. ↑ Tobias, ML; Viswanathan, SS; Kelley, DB (1998). "Rapping, a female receptive call, initiates male-female duets in the South African clawed frog". Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 95: 1870–1875. doi:10.1073/pnas.95.4.1870. PMC 19205.
  10. ↑ Harland, RM; Grainger, RM (2011). "Xenopus research: metamorphosed by genetics and genomics". Trends Genet. 27 (12): 507–15. doi:10.1016/j.tig.2011.08.003. PMC 3601910. PMID 21963197.
  11. ↑ Session, AM; Uno, Y; Kwon, T; Chapman, JA; Toyoda, A; Takahashi, S; Fukui, A; Hikosaka, A; Suzuki, A; Kondo, M; van Heeringen, SJ; Quigley, I; Heinz, S; Ogino, H; Ochi, H; Hellsten, U; Lyons, JB; Simakov, O; Putnam, N; Stites, J; Kuroki, Y; Tanaka, T; Michiue, T; Watanabe, M; Bogdanovic, O; Lister, R; Georgiou, G; Paranjpe, SS; van Kruijsbergen, I; Shu, S; Carlson, J; Kinoshita, T; Ohta, Y; Mawaribuchi, S; Jenkins, J; Grimwood, J; Schmutz, J; Mitros, T; Mozaffari, SV; Suzuki, Y; Haramoto, Y; Yamamoto, TS; Takagi, C; Heald, R; Miller, K; Haudenschild, C; Kitzman, J; Nakayama, T; Izutsu, Y; Robert, J; Fortriede, J; Burns, K; Lotay, V; Karimi, K; Yasuoka, Y; Dichmann, DS; Flajnik, MF; Houston, DW; Shendure, J; DuPasquier, L; Vize, PD; Zorn, AM; Ito, M; Marcotte, EM; Wallingford, JB; Ito, Y; Asashima, M; Ueno, N; Matsuda, Y; Veenstra, GJ; Fujiyama, A; Harland, RM; Taira, M; Rokhsar, DS (20 October 2016). "Genome evolution in the allotetraploid frog Xenopus laevis". Nature. 538 (7625): 336–343. doi:10.1038/nature19840. PMID 27762356.
  12. ↑ Schmid, M; Evans, BJ; Bogart, JP (2015). "Polyploidy in Amphibia". Cytogenet. Genome Res. 145 (3–4): 315–30. doi:10.1159/000431388. PMID 26112701.
  13. ↑ Karimi K, Fortriede JD, Lotay VS, Burns KA, Wang DZ, Fisher ME, Pells TJ, James-Zorn C, Wang Y, Ponferrada VG, Chu S, Chaturvedi P, Zorn AM, Vize PD (2018). "Xenbase: a genomic, epigenomic and transcriptomic model organism database". Nucleic Acids Research. 46 (D1): D861–D868. doi:10.1093/nar/gkx936. PMC 5753396. PMID 29059324.
  14. ↑ "Xenopus model organism database". Xenbase.org.
  15. ↑ On The Pituitary, Lancelot Hogben, Enid Charles, David Slome, Journal of Experimental Biology 1931 8: 345-354
  16. ↑ Xenopus Pregnancy Test, Edward R. Elkan M.D., British Medical Journal 1938;2:1253, 17 December 1938
  17. ↑ Diagnosis of Pregnancy, Louis P. Bosman, British Medical Journal 1937;2:939, 6 November 1937
  18. ↑ Used to Use Live African Frogs As Pregnancy Tests, Rachel Nuwer, Smithsonian.com, 16 May 2013
  19. ↑ Hardwick, Laura J. A.; Philpott, Anna (2015-12-15). "An oncologist׳s friend: How Xenopus contributes to cancer research". Developmental Biology. Modeling Human Development and Disease in Xenopus. 408 (2): 180–187. doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2015.02.003.
  20. ↑ Gurdon, J. B.; Lane, C. D.; Woodland, H. R.; Marbaix, G. (17 September 1971). "Use of Frog Eggs and Oocytes for the Study of Messenger RNA and its Translation in Living Cells". Nature. 233 (5316): 177–182. doi:10.1038/233177a0. PMID 4939175.
  21. ↑ Reynolds, F. H.; Premkumar, E.; Pitha, P. M. (1 December 1975). "Interferon activity produced by translation of human interferon messenger RNA in cell-free ribosomal systems and in Xenopus oocytes". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 72 (12): 4881–4885. doi:10.1073/pnas.72.12.4881. PMC 388836.
  22. ↑ Heasman, J; Kofron, M; Wylie, C (Jun 1, 2000). "Beta-catenin signaling activity dissected in the early Xenopus embryo: a novel antisense approach". Developmental Biology. 222 (1): 124–34. doi:10.1006/dbio.2000.9720. PMID 10885751.
  23. ↑ Schäfer, Tobias; Pütz, Michael; Lienkamp, Soeren; Ganner, Athina; Bergbreiter, Astrid; Ramachandran, Haribaskar; Gieloff, Verena; Gerner, Martin; Mattonet, Christian (2008-12-01). "Genetic and physical interaction between the NPHP5 and NPHP6 gene products". Human Molecular Genetics. 17 (23): 3655–3662. doi:10.1093/hmg/ddn260. ISSN 1460-2083. PMC 2802281. PMID 18723859.
  24. ↑ Reversade, Bruno; Escande-Beillard, Nathalie; Dimopoulou, Aikaterini; Fischer, Björn; Chng, Serene C.; Li, Yun; Shboul, Mohammad; Tham, Puay-Yoke; Kayserili, Hülya (2009-09-01). "Mutations in PYCR1 cause cutis laxa with progeroid features". Nature Genetics. 41 (9): 1016–1021. doi:10.1038/ng.413. ISSN 1546-1718. PMID 19648921.
  25. ↑ Pittman, Alan M.; Naranjo, Silvia; Webb, Emily; Broderick, Peter; Lips, Esther H.; van Wezel, Tom; Morreau, Hans; Sullivan, Kate; Fielding, Sarah (2009-06-01). "The colorectal cancer risk at 18q21 is caused by a novel variant altering SMAD7 expression". Genome Research. 19 (6): 987–993. doi:10.1101/gr.092668.109. ISSN 1088-9051. PMC 2694486. PMID 19395656.
  26. ↑ Joukov, V; Groen, AC; Prokhorova, T; Gerson, R; White, E; Rodriguez, A; Walter, JC; Livingston, DM (Nov 3, 2006). "The BRCA1/BARD1 heterodimer modulates ran-dependent mitotic spindle assembly". Cell. 127 (3): 539–52. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.08.053. PMID 17081976.
  27. ↑ You, Z; Bailis, JM; Johnson, SA; Dilworth, SM; Hunter, T (Nov 2007). "Rapid activation of ATM on DNA flanking double-strand breaks". Nature Cell Biology. 9 (11): 1311–8. doi:10.1038/ncb1651. PMID 17952060.
  28. ↑ Ben-Yehoyada, M; Wang, LC; Kozekov, ID; Rizzo, CJ; Gottesman, ME; Gautier, J (Sep 11, 2009). "Checkpoint signaling from a single DNA interstrand crosslink". Molecular Cell. 35 (5): 704–15. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2009.08.014. PMC 2756577. PMID 19748363.
  29. ↑ Sobeck, Alexandra; Stone, Stacie; Landais, Igor; de Graaf, Bendert; Hoatlin, Maureen E. (2009-09-18). "The Fanconi Anemia Protein FANCM Is Controlled by FANCD2 and the ATR/ATM Pathways". The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 284 (38): 25560–25568. doi:10.1074/jbc.M109.007690. ISSN 0021-9258. PMC 2757957. PMID 19633289.
  30. ↑ Dominguez-Sola, D; Ying, CY; Grandori, C; Ruggiero, L; Chen, B; Li, M; Galloway, DA; Gu, W; Gautier, J; Dalla-Favera, R (Jul 26, 2007). "Non-transcriptional control of DNA replication by c-Myc". Nature. 448 (7152): 445–51. doi:10.1038/nature05953. PMID 17597761.
  31. ↑ Dean, S; Marchetti, R; Kirk, K; Matthews, KR (May 14, 2009). "A surface transporter family conveys the trypanosome differentiation signal". Nature. 459 (7244): 213–7. doi:10.1038/nature07997. PMC 2685892. PMID 19444208.
  32. ↑ Bockenhauer, Detlef; Feather, Sally; Stanescu, Horia C.; Bandulik, Sascha; Zdebik, Anselm A.; Reichold, Markus; Tobin, Jonathan; Lieberer, Evelyn; Sterner, Christina (2009-05-07). "Epilepsy, ataxia, sensorineural deafness, tubulopathy, and KCNJ10 mutations". The New England Journal of Medicine. 360 (19): 1960–1970. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0810276. ISSN 1533-4406. PMC 3398803. PMID 19420365.
  33. ↑ Gustina, AS; Trudeau, MC (Aug 4, 2009). "A recombinant N-terminal domain fully restores deactivation gating in N-truncated and long QT syndrome mutant hERG potassium channels". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 106 (31): 13082–7. doi:10.1073/pnas.0900180106. PMC 2722319. PMID 19651618.
  34. ↑ Duarri, Anna; Teijido, Oscar; López-Hernández, Tania; Scheper, Gert C.; Barriere, Herve; Boor, Ilja; Aguado, Fernando; Zorzano, Antonio; Palacín, Manuel (2008-12-01). "Molecular pathogenesis of megalencephalic leukoencephalopathy with subcortical cysts: mutations in MLC1 cause folding defects". Human Molecular Genetics. 17 (23): 3728–3739. doi:10.1093/hmg/ddn269. ISSN 1460-2083. PMC 2581428. PMID 18757878.
  35. ↑ Blitz, Ira L.; Biesinger, Jacob; Xie, Xiaohui; Cho, Ken W.Y. (2013-12-01). "Biallelic genome modification in F0Xenopus tropicalis embryos using the CRISPR/Cas system". genesis. 51 (12): 827–834. doi:10.1002/dvg.22719. ISSN 1526-968X. PMC 4039559. PMID 24123579.
  36. ↑ Nakayama, Takuya; Fish, Margaret B.; Fisher, Marilyn; Oomen-Hajagos, Jamina; Thomsen, Gerald H.; Grainger, Robert M. (2013-12-01). "Simple and efficient CRISPR/Cas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in Xenopus tropicalis". genesis. 51 (12): 835–843. doi:10.1002/dvg.22720. ISSN 1526-968X. PMC 3947545. PMID 24123613.
  37. ↑ Wang, Fengqin; Shi, Zhaoying; Cui, Yan; Guo, Xiaogang; Shi, Yun-Bo; Chen, Yonglong (2015-04-14). "Targeted gene disruption in Xenopus laevis using CRISPR/Cas9". Cell & Bioscience. 5 (1). doi:10.1186/s13578-015-0006-1. PMC 4403895. PMID 25897376.
  38. ↑ Bhattacharya, Dipankan; Marfo, Chris A.; Li, Davis; Lane, Maura; Khokha, Mustafa K. (2015-12-15). "CRISPR/Cas9: An inexpensive, efficient loss of function tool to screen human disease genes in Xenopus". Developmental Biology. Modeling Human Development and Disease in Xenopus. 408 (2): 196–204. doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2015.11.003. PMC 4684459. PMID 26546975.
  39. ↑ Dupont, Sirio; Mamidi, Anant; Cordenonsi, Michelangelo; Montagner, Marco; Zacchigna, Luca; Adorno, Maddalena; Martello, Graziano; Stinchfield, Michael J.; Soligo, Sandra (2009-01-09). "FAM/USP9x, a deubiquitinating enzyme essential for TGFbeta signaling, controls Smad4 monoubiquitination". Cell. 136 (1): 123–135. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2008.10.051. ISSN 1097-4172. PMID 19135894.
  40. ↑ Cordenonsi, Michelangelo; Montagner, Marco; Adorno, Maddalena; Zacchigna, Luca; Martello, Graziano; Mamidi, Anant; Soligo, Sandra; Dupont, Sirio; Piccolo, Stefano (2007-02-09). "Integration of TGF-beta and Ras/MAPK signaling through p53 phosphorylation". Science. 315 (5813): 840–843. doi:10.1126/science.1135961. ISSN 1095-9203. PMID 17234915.
  41. ↑ Fuentealba, Luis C.; Eivers, Edward; Ikeda, Atsushi; Hurtado, Cecilia; Kuroda, Hiroki; Pera, Edgar M.; De Robertis, Edward M. (2007-11-30). "Integrating patterning signals: Wnt/GSK3 regulates the duration of the BMP/Smad1 signal". Cell. 131 (5): 980–993. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2007.09.027. ISSN 0092-8674. PMC 2200633. PMID 18045539.
  42. ↑ Kim, Nam-Gyun; Xu, Chong; Gumbiner, Barry M. (2009-03-31). "Identification of targets of the Wnt pathway destruction complex in addition to beta-catenin". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 106 (13): 5165–5170. doi:10.1073/pnas.0810185106. ISSN 1091-6490. PMC 2663984. PMID 19289839.
  43. ↑ Kaláb, Petr; Pralle, Arnd; Isacoff, Ehud Y.; Heald, Rebecca; Weis, Karsten (2006-03-30). "Analysis of a RanGTP-regulated gradient in mitotic somatic cells". Nature. 440 (7084): 697–701. doi:10.1038/nature04589. ISSN 1476-4687. PMID 16572176.
  44. ↑ Tsai, Ming-Ying; Wang, Shusheng; Heidinger, Jill M.; Shumaker, Dale K.; Adam, Stephen A.; Goldman, Robert D.; Zheng, Yixian (2006-03-31). "A mitotic lamin B matrix induced by RanGTP required for spindle assembly". Science. 311 (5769): 1887–1893. doi:10.1126/science.1122771. ISSN 1095-9203. PMID 16543417.
  45. ↑ Ma, Li; Tsai, Ming-Ying; Wang, Shusheng; Lu, Bingwen; Chen, Rong; Iii, John R. Yates; Zhu, Xueliang; Zheng, Yixian (2009-03-01). "Requirement for Nudel and dynein for assembly of the lamin B spindle matrix". Nature Cell Biology. 11 (3): 247–256. doi:10.1038/ncb1832. ISSN 1476-4679. PMC 2699591. PMID 19198602.
  46. ↑ Emanuele, Michael J.; Stukenberg, P. Todd (2007-09-07). "Xenopus Cep57 is a novel kinetochore component involved in microtubule attachment". Cell. 130 (5): 893–905. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2007.07.023. ISSN 0092-8674. PMID 17803911.
  47. ↑ Akkers, Robert C.; van Heeringen, Simon J.; Jacobi, Ulrike G.; Janssen-Megens, Eva M.; Françoijs, Kees-Jan; Stunnenberg, Hendrik G.; Veenstra, Gert Jan C. (2009-09-01). "A hierarchy of H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 acquisition in spatial gene regulation in Xenopus embryos". Developmental Cell. 17 (3): 425–434. doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2009.08.005. ISSN 1878-1551. PMC 2746918. PMID 19758566.
  48. ↑ Hontelez, Saartje; van Kruijsbergen, Ila; Georgiou, Georgios; van Heeringen, Simon J.; Bogdanovic, Ozren; Lister, Ryan; Veenstra, Gert Jan C. (2015-01-01). "Embryonic transcription is controlled by maternally defined chromatin state". Nature Communications. 6: 10148. doi:10.1038/ncomms10148. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 4703837. PMID 26679111.
  49. ↑ Walker, James C.; Harland, Richard M. (2009-05-01). "microRNA-24a is required to repress apoptosis in the developing neural retina". Genes & Development. 23 (9): 1046–1051. doi:10.1101/gad.1777709. ISSN 1549-5477. PMC 2682950. PMID 19372388.
  50. ↑ Rosa, Alessandro; Spagnoli, Francesca M.; Brivanlou, Ali H. (2009-04-01). "The miR-430/427/302 family controls mesendodermal fate specification via species-specific target selection". Developmental Cell. 16 (4): 517–527. doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2009.02.007. ISSN 1878-1551. PMID 19386261.
  51. ↑ Park, Jae-Il; Venteicher, Andrew S.; Hong, Ji Yeon; Choi, Jinkuk; Jun, Sohee; Shkreli, Marina; Chang, Woody; Meng, Zhaojing; Cheung, Peggie (2009-07-02). "Telomerase modulates Wnt signalling by association with target gene chromatin". Nature. 460 (7251): 66–72. doi:10.1038/nature08137. ISSN 1476-4687. PMC 4349391. PMID 19571879.
  52. ↑ De Val, Sarah; Chi, Neil C.; Meadows, Stryder M.; Minovitsky, Simon; Anderson, Joshua P.; Harris, Ian S.; Ehlers, Melissa L.; Agarwal, Pooja; Visel, Axel (2008-12-12). "Combinatorial regulation of endothelial gene expression by ets and forkhead transcription factors". Cell. 135 (6): 1053–1064. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2008.10.049. ISSN 1097-4172. PMC 2782666. PMID 19070576.
  53. ↑ Li, Yan; Rankin, Scott A.; Sinner, Débora; Kenny, Alan P.; Krieg, Paul A.; Zorn, Aaron M. (2008-11-01). "Sfrp5 coordinates foregut specification and morphogenesis by antagonizing both canonical and noncanonical Wnt11 signaling". Genes & Development. 22 (21): 3050–3063. doi:10.1101/gad.1687308. ISSN 0890-9369. PMC 2577796. PMID 18981481.
  54. ↑ Carmona-Fontaine, Carlos; Matthews, Helen K.; Kuriyama, Sei; Moreno, Mauricio; Dunn, Graham A.; Parsons, Maddy; Stern, Claudio D.; Mayor, Roberto (2008-12-18). "Contact inhibition of locomotion in vivo controls neural crest directional migration". Nature. 456 (7224): 957–961. doi:10.1038/nature07441. ISSN 1476-4687. PMC 2635562. PMID 19078960.
  55. ↑ Buitrago-Delgado, Elsy; Nordin, Kara; Rao, Anjali; Geary, Lauren; LaBonne, Carole (2015-06-19). "NEURODEVELOPMENT. Shared regulatory programs suggest retention of blastula-stage potential in neural crest cells". Science. 348 (6241): 1332–1335. doi:10.1126/science.aaa3655. ISSN 1095-9203. PMC 4652794. PMID 25931449.
  56. ↑ Tsuji, Toshiya; Lau, Eric; Chiang, Gary G.; Jiang, Wei (2008-12-26). "The role of Dbf4/Drf1-dependent kinase Cdc7 in DNA-damage checkpoint control". Molecular Cell. 32 (6): 862–869. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2008.12.005. ISSN 1097-4164. PMC 4556649. PMID 19111665.
  57. ↑ Xu, Xiaohua; Rochette, Patrick J.; Feyissa, Eminet A.; Su, Tina V.; Liu, Yilun (2009-10-07). "MCM10 mediates RECQ4 association with MCM2-7 helicase complex during DNA replication". The EMBO Journal. 28 (19): 3005–3014. doi:10.1038/emboj.2009.235. ISSN 1460-2075. PMC 2760112. PMID 19696745.
  58. ↑ Ben-Yehoyada, Merav; Wang, Lily C.; Kozekov, Ivan D.; Rizzo, Carmelo J.; Gottesman, Max E.; Gautier, Jean (2009-09-11). "Checkpoint signaling from a single DNA interstrand crosslink". Molecular Cell. 35 (5): 704–715. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2009.08.014. ISSN 1097-4164. PMC 2756577. PMID 19748363.
  59. ↑ Räschle, Markus; Knipscheer, Puck; Knipsheer, Puck; Enoiu, Milica; Angelov, Todor; Sun, Jingchuan; Griffith, Jack D.; Ellenberger, Tom E.; Schärer, Orlando D. (2008-09-19). "Mechanism of replication-coupled DNA interstrand crosslink repair". Cell. 134 (6): 969–980. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2008.08.030. ISSN 1097-4172. PMC 2748255. PMID 18805090.
  60. ↑ MacDougall, Christina A.; Byun, Tony S.; Van, Christopher; Yee, Muh-ching; Cimprich, Karlene A. (2007-04-15). "The structural determinants of checkpoint activation". Genes & Development. 21 (8): 898–903. doi:10.1101/gad.1522607. ISSN 0890-9369. PMC 1847708. PMID 17437996.
  61. ↑ Nutt, Leta K.; Buchakjian, Marisa R.; Gan, Eugene; Darbandi, Rashid; Yoon, Sook-Young; Wu, Judy Q.; Miyamoto, Yuko J.; Gibbons, Jennifer A.; Gibbon, Jennifer A. (2009-06-01). "Metabolic control of oocyte apoptosis mediated by 14-3-3zeta-regulated dephosphorylation of caspase-2". Developmental Cell. 16 (6): 856–866. doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2009.04.005. ISSN 1878-1551. PMC 2698816. PMID 19531356.
  62. ↑ Viczian, Andrea S.; Solessio, Eduardo C.; Lyou, Yung; Zuber, Michael E. (2009-08-01). "Generation of functional eyes from pluripotent cells". PLOS Biology. 7 (8): e1000174. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000174. ISSN 1545-7885. PMC 2716519. PMID 19688031.
  63. ↑ Dzamba, Bette J.; Jakab, Karoly R.; Marsden, Mungo; Schwartz, Martin A.; DeSimone, Douglas W. (2009-03-01). "Cadherin adhesion, tissue tension, and noncanonical Wnt signaling regulate fibronectin matrix organization". Developmental Cell. 16 (3): 421–432. doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2009.01.008. ISSN 1878-1551. PMC 2682918. PMID 19289087.
  64. ↑ Park, Tae Joo; Mitchell, Brian J.; Abitua, Philip B.; Kintner, Chris; Wallingford, John B. (2008-07-01). "Dishevelled controls apical docking and planar polarization of basal bodies in ciliated epithelial cells". Nature Genetics. 40 (7): 871–879. doi:10.1038/ng.104. ISSN 1546-1718. PMC 2771675. PMID 18552847.
  65. ↑ Mitchell, Brian; Jacobs, Richard; Li, Julie; Chien, Shu; Kintner, Chris (2007-05-03). "A positive feedback mechanism governs the polarity and motion of motile cilia". Nature. 447 (7140): 97–101. doi:10.1038/nature05771. ISSN 1476-4687. PMID 17450123.
  66. ↑ Kälin, Roland E.; Bänziger-Tobler, Nadja E.; Detmar, Michael; Brändli, André W. (2009-07-30). "An in vivo chemical library screen in Xenopus tadpoles reveals novel pathways involved in angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis". Blood. 114 (5): 1110–1122. doi:10.1182/blood-2009-03-211771. ISSN 1528-0020. PMC 2721788. PMID 19478043.
  67. ↑ Ny, Annelii; Koch, Marta; Vandevelde, Wouter; Schneider, Martin; Fischer, Christian; Diez-Juan, Antonio; Neven, Elke; Geudens, Ilse; Maity, Sunit (2008-09-01). "Role of VEGF-D and VEGFR-3 in developmental lymphangiogenesis, a chemicogenetic study in Xenopus tadpoles" (PDF). Blood. 112 (5): 1740–1749. doi:10.1182/blood-2007-08-106302. ISSN 1528-0020. PMID 18474726.
  68. ↑ Cha, Hye Ji; Byrom, Michelle; Mead, Paul E.; Ellington, Andrew D.; Wallingford, John B.; Marcotte, Edward M. (2012-01-01). "Evolutionarily repurposed networks reveal the well-known antifungal drug thiabendazole to be a novel vascular disrupting agent". PLOS Biology. 10 (8): e1001379. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001379. ISSN 1545-7885. PMC 3423972. PMID 22927795.
  69. ↑ "Gene Tests in Yeast Aid Work on Cancer".
  70. ↑ Fini, Jean-Baptiste; Le Mevel, Sebastien; Turque, Nathalie; Palmier, Karima; Zalko, Daniel; Cravedi, Jean-Pierre; Demeneix, Barbara A. (2007-08-15). "An in vivo multiwell-based fluorescent screen for monitoring vertebrate thyroid hormone disruption". Environmental Science & Technology. 41 (16): 5908–5914. doi:10.1021/es0704129. ISSN 0013-936X. PMID 17874805.
  71. ↑ Nat Chem Biol. 2008. 4, 119-25; Int. J. Cancer. 2009. 124, 783-92
  72. 1 2 Dagle, J. M.; Weeks, D. L. (2001-12-01). "Oligonucleotide-based strategies to reduce gene expression". Differentiation; Research in Biological Diversity. 69 (2–3): 75–82. doi:10.1046/j.1432-0436.2001.690201.x. ISSN 0301-4681. PMID 11798068.
  73. 1 2 Blum, Martin; De Robertis, Edward M.; Wallingford, John B.; Niehrs, Christof (2015-10-26). "Morpholinos: Antisense and Sensibility". Developmental Cell. 35 (2): 145–149. doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2015.09.017. ISSN 1878-1551. PMID 26506304.
  74. ↑ Rana AA, Collart C, Gilchrist MJ, Smith JC (November 2006). "Defining synphenotype groups in Xenopus tropicalis by use of antisense morpholino oligonucleotides". PLoS Genet. 2 (11): e193. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.0020193. PMC 1636699. PMID 17112317.
    "A Xenopus tropicalis antisense morpholino screen". Gurdon Institute.
  75. ↑ Xenbase
  • Xenbase ~ A Xenopus laevis and tropicalis Web Resource
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.