Pueblo Mágico

The Programa Pueblos Mágicos (Spanish   ) ("Magical Towns Programme") is an initiative led by Mexico's Secretariat of Tourism, with the support from other federal agencies, to promote a series of towns around the country that offer visitors a "magical" experience – by reason of their natural beauty, cultural richness, traditions, folklore, historical relevance, cuisine, art crafts and great hospitality.

The Mexican Ministry or Secretariat of Tourism acknowledges that México´s magical experience is not only in the famous sun and beaches, it is much more than that. The success of Mexico is due in part to the great Mexican hospitality and culture, which keeps many tourists coming back.

The Government created the 'Pueblos Mágicos' program to recognize places across the country that imbue certain characteristics that make them unique, historically significant, with great traditions, and offer magical experiences to its visitors. A "Magical Village" is a place with symbolism, legends, history, important events, festivals, traditions, great food, and fun interactive shopping, day-to-day life – in other words, "magic" in its social and cultural manifestations, with great opportunities for tourism. Every Pueblo Magico offers a special experience to the visitor.

The programme was launched in 2001 and after 9 years and 32 towns selected, it was improved and relaunched in 2010 with significant resources to unlock the potential[1] and they were supported by a strategic campaign to promote them across the country. Every town was assigned a budget to continue improving its infrastructure, image, product offering and experience while making sure they were maintaining their traditions and their festivals were promoted. [2] By 2012 a total of 83 towns and villages in all 31 states have been awarded the title or nomination of Pueblo Mágico. The program created pride, recognition for its local citizens and it was part of the diversification strategy from Secretary of Tourism to promote culture and Mexican traditions.

The program has offered opportunities to citizens to create a living from tourism, and it has made significant contributions to the economies of not only the pueblos, but also the entire regions, as visitors' spending created important jobs in the towns with the most economic needs. Towns with over 5 thousand citizens are receiving more than 20 thousand visitors during the weekends, which contributes to the economy and the well-being of its residents.

Objectives

The objectives of this program are:[3][4][5][6]

  • To structure a supplementary and diversified touristic supply within the interior of the country for locations that contain important historical and cultural attributes.
  • To diversify the country tourism offering
  • To create and promote craftsmanship and support traditional festivals
  • To preserve local traditions, culture, ethnic customs and the unique cuisine
  • To create tourist products like adventures, extreme sports, ecotourism, festivals, local rutas, wine and food activities and sport fishing.
  • Reassess, consolidate and reinforce touristic attractions of these towns in the country which represent fresh and different alternatives to meet the rising demand of national visitors and foreigners.
  • To create jobs and reduce poverty
  • This program was also developed with the purpose of recognizing the labor of its residents who have kept their cultural and historical riches of their home towns

Criteria

In order to qualify for the program the towns should have a population of at least 5 thousand, and should be located no more than 300 km or the equivalent of traveling three hours by land from a city with a well-resourced market or good connectivity.[7] In addition to the town's municipal and state authorities requesting incorporation to the Secretariat of Tourism so that they can make an assessment visit to evaluate the potential of the site,[3][7][8] towns also had to meet specific requirements in order to be considered. The criteria included some of the following:

I. A formally constituted "Pueblo Mágico committee". This is a group of citizens who represent the pueblo or local community; if awarded the title, they were responsible for maintaining the declaration by working with the local citizens. Their job is to represent the residents of the town and their interests to make sure that the declaration will benefit all and by working together to maximise the opportunities. This group has to be diverse with no more than 15 people and their work is pro-bono. Group members should rotate periodically.

II. A town council accord which states an agreement to apply for admittance into the program. The local authorities have to support the inclusion in the program as their support is essential for the success of the town. This document provides formal support.

III. Agreement of the state congress; state support is needed to assign resources, mainly for infrastructure.

IV. Direct economic contribution towards touristic development in projects, action plans and programs. It is very important for each town to differentiate themselves from other towns. It should include the unique features of the town and why it should be considered.

V. An updated municipal touristic development program with a time frame of at least three years. A long term plan should be for 3 years to make sure the declaration is maintained, and the experience always improved. The program should be updated every three years.

VI. Updated rules and local regulations with a touristic focus during current administration of the Municipality. This is to support and protect visitors and people dedicated to tourism activities. Clear rules and regulations offer certainty and clarity to the importance of these activities.

VII. Evidence of symbolic attraction of the aspiring community, or what makes the town unique and differentiates it from other towns.

VIII. Health and public security services for tourists in case of an emergency.

IX. Private and social investment in touristic development and quality, including hotel rooms, restaurants, tours, museums, activities, etc.

X. Other elements that the committee considers relevant for touristic activity.

Process

  • The Pueblo's citizens committee and relevant stakeholders create the file containing all documents, details fulfilling all the requirements, and the request of candidacy to the Secretary of Tourism and the evaluation committee.
  • A formal presentation with examples and details is made to the evaluation committee during a scheduled appointment in Mexico City.
  • The formal committee has representation from Secretariats of Tourism, Culture, Environment and several other government officials.
  • The evaluation committee reviews the file, ensures that all the requirements were met, conducts a physical inspection in the town, and reports back by documenting findings.
  • If 100% of the requirements are met then they approve the nomination and turn matters over to the Secretary of Tourism who is responsible to visit the Pueblo, invite the local authorities and local residents, and give the new "nomination" or declaration at the same time that it has to take the oath to the local committee representing the citizens of the town.
  • The local citizens and the committee are responsible to maintain the declaration and the town's "magic" standing. Nominations are not permanent, with annual revisions and audits for some towns.
  • If an applying pueblo doesn't meet the requirements, the details are shared back to the committee, and the pueblo will be asked to provide any requested missing information.
  • If the Pueblo doesn't qualify due to inability to meet the required attributes, a formal response is provided to the committee.

Mexico has more than 2500 municipalities; hundreds apply annually to this program with very few of them being selected. This is a very successful and prestigious program that provides benefits to local residents who benefit from the resulting economic activity bringing prosperity and various tangible and intangible benefits to their communities.[9]

List

# Image Town State Registration Year
1Huasca de OcampoHidalgo2001
2Real de CatorceSan Luis Potosí2001
3TaxcoGuerrero2002
4TepotzotlánMéxico2002
5TapalpaJalisco2002
6ComalaColima2002
7PátzcuaroMichoacán2002
8Dolores HidalgoGuanajuato2002
9CuetzalanPuebla2002
10IzamalYucatán2002
11TequilaJalisco2003
12San Cristóbal de las CasasChiapas2003
13Real del MonteHidalgo2004
14Parras de la FuenteCoahuila2004
15Valle de BravoMéxico2005
16MazamitlaJalisco2005
17ÁlamosSonora2005
18TlalpujahuaMichoacán2005
19CosaláSinaloa2005
20BernalQuerétaro2005
21CoatepecVeracruz2006
22Real de AsientosAguascalientes2006
23CuitzeoMichoacán2006
24SantiagoNuevo León2006
25Todos SantosBaja California Sur2006
26BacalarQuintana Roo2006
27Jerez de García SalinasZacatecas2007
28HuamantlaTlaxcala2007
29CreelChihuahua2007
30Capulálpam de MéndezOaxaca2007
31Ciudad MierTamaulipas2007
32El FuerteSinaloa2009
33Santa Clara del Cobre Michoacán2010
34TepoztlánMorelosDeclared in 2001, status revoked in 2009, but restored in 2010
35TapijulapaTabasco2010
36PalizadaCampeche2010
37Jalpan de SerraQuerétaro2010
38MalinalcoMéxico2010
39ZacatlánPuebla2011
40Teúl de González OrtegaZacatecas2011
41TlayacapanMorelos2011
42Mineral del ChicoHidalgo2011
43Cadereyta de MontesQuerétaro2011
44TulaTamaulipas2011
45El OroMéxico2011
46XicoVeracruz2011
47San Sebastián del OesteJalisco2011
48XilitlaSan Luis Potosí2011
49Mineral de PozosGuanajuato2012
50SombrereteZacatecas2012
51AngangueoMichoacán2012
52Cuatrociénegas de CarranzaCoahuila2012
53Magdalena de KinoSonora2012
54PahuatlánPuebla2012
55LoretoBaja California Sur2012
56ValladolidYucatan2012
57MetepecMéxico2012
58Chiapa de CorzoChiapas2012
59ComitánChiapas2012
60HuichapanHidalgo2012
61TequisquiapanQuerétaro2012
62BatopilasChihuahua2012
63Chignahuapan Puebla2012
64 Cholula (San Pedro y San Andrés) Puebla2012
65PinosZacatecas2012
66Lagos de MorenoJalisco2012
67TacámbaroMichoacán2012
68CalvilloAguascalientes2012
69NochistlanZacatecas2012
70JiquilpanMichoacán2012
71TlatlauquitepecPuebla2012
72TzintzuntzanMichoacán2012
73MapimíDurango2012
74PapantlaVeracruz2012
75TecateBaja California2012
76ArteagaCoahuila2012
77ViescaCoahuila2012
78Jalpa de CánovasGuanajuato2012
79SalvatierraGuanajuato2012
80YuririaGuanajuato2012
81XicotepecPuebla2012
82JalaNayarit2012
83El RosarioSinaloa2012
84Aculco De EspinozaMéxico2015
85AtlixcoPuebla2015
86CandelaCoahuila2015
87Casas GrandesChihuahua2015
88Coscomatepec de BravoVeracruz2015
89GuerreroCoahuila2015
90HuauchinangoPuebla2015
91Huautla de JimenezOaxaca2015
92Isla MujeresQuintana Roo2015
93Ixtapan de la SalMéxico2015
94LinaresNuevo Leon2015
95MascotaJalisco2015
96MazunteOaxaca2015
97MocoritoSinaloa2015
98OrizabaVeracruz2015
99PalenqueChiapas2015
100San JoaquínQuerétaro2015
101San José de GraciaAguascalientes2015
102San Pablo Villa de MitlaOaxaca2015
103San Pedro y San Pablo TeposcolulaOaxaca2015
104SayulitaNayarit2015
105Talpa de AllendeJalisco2015
106TecozautlaHidalgo2015
107TeotihuacánMéxico2015
108TlaxcoTlaxcala2015
109TulumQuintana Roo2015
110Villa del CarbónMéxico2015
111Zozocolco de HidalgoVeracruz2015
112[[]]Nombre de DiosDurango2018 [10]
113[[]]Melchor MúzquizCoahuila2018
114[[]]ComonfortGuanajuato2018
115[[]]ZimapánHidalgo2018
116[[]]TlaquepaqueJalisco2018
117[[]]CompostelaNayarit2018
118[[]]Amealco de BonfilQueretaro2018
119[[]]AquismónSan Luis Potosi2018
120[[]]BustamanteNuevo Leon2018
121[[]]GuadalupeZacatecas2018

Towns removed from the program

Below is the list of sites that were enrolled in the program, but had their titles revoked for failure to meet standards during the re-evaluation or audit. Two of them had their status restored and one received enhanced recognition.

# Image Town State Registration Year Retirement Year
1San Miguel de AllendeGuanajuato2002In 2008 its status on the list was removed due to its inclusion as an UNESCO World Heritage Site.
2TepoztlánMorelos2001In 2009 its status was removed, and then restored in 2010.
3MexcaltitlánNayarit2001Status removed in 2009.
4PapantlaVeracruz2006In 2009 its status was removed, and then restored in 2012.

Other

Some governments have tried to eliminate the program for political reasons but because this model is a citizen-based program focusing on empowering communities, these efforts have been unsuccessful. According to statistics from INEGI, the Pueblo Mágico program has provided great economic value, and created jobs for its participating communities. The program has been recognised by several countries around the world, as a role model domestically and internationally. [11]

References

  1. http://www.zocalo.com.mx/new_site/articulo/destinan-mil-900-mdp-a-pueblos-magicos
  2. https://www.mexicodesconocido.com.mx/destinos-vivir-dia-muertos-mexico.html Day of the Dead in Pueblo Magico
  3. 1 2 "Pueblos Mágicos, herencia que impulsan Turismo". gob.mx (in Spanish). Retrieved 2017-03-06.
  4. Balslev Clausen, Helene; Gyimóthy, Szilvia. "Seizing community participation in sustainable development: pueblos Mágicos of Mexico". Journal of Cleaner Production. 111: 318–326. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.01.084.
  5. Pérez-Ramírez, Carlos Alberto; Antolín-Espinosa, Diana Itzel (2016). "Programa pueblos magicos y desarrollo local: Actores, dimensiones y perspectivas en El Oro, Mexico". Estudios Sociales. 25 (47): 217. ISSN 0188-4557.
  6. Uhnák, Adam (2014-06-01). "The Mexican 'Pueblos Mágicos'. A Qualitative Research Using Ethnological Methodology". Ethnologia Actualis. 14 (1). doi:10.2478/eas-2014-0001. ISSN 1339-7877.
  7. 1 2 México, El Universal, Compañia Periodística Nacional. "El Universal - - Concierge Cómo identificar un pueblo mágico". archivo.eluniversal.com.mx (in Spanish). Retrieved 2017-03-06.
  8. "DOF - Diario Oficial de la Federación". www.dof.gob.mx (in Spanish). Retrieved 2017-03-06.
  9. economic
  10. https://expansion.mx/nacional/2018/10/12/mexico-tiene-10-nuevos-pueblos-magicos
  11. Example at internal level and to other countries
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.