Jones fracture

Jones fracture
Synonyms Fracture of the proximal diaphysis of the fifth metatarsal
Jones fracture as seen on Xray
Specialty Emergency medicine, orthopedics
Symptoms Pain near the midportion of the foot on the outside, bruising[1][2]
Usual onset Sudden[3]
Duration 6-12 weeks to heal[4]
Causes Bending the foot inwards when the toes are pointed[5]
Diagnostic method Based on symptoms, X-rays[2]
Differential diagnosis Pseudo-Jones fracture, normal growth plate[2][6]
Treatment Non-weight bearing, cast, surgery[4]

A Jones fracture is a break between the base and middle part of the fifth metatarsal of the foot.[7] It results in pain near the midportion of the foot on the outside.[1] There may also be bruising and difficulty walking.[2] Onset is generally sudden.[3]

The fracture typically occurs when the toes are pointed and the foot bends inwards.[5][1] This movement may occur when changing direction while the heel is off the ground such in dancing, tennis, or basketball.[8][9] Diagnosis is generally suspected based on symptoms and confirmed with X-rays.[2]

Initial treatment is typically in a cast, without any walking on it, for at least six weeks.[4] If after this period of time healing has not occurred a further six weeks of casting may be recommended.[4] Due to poor blood supply in this area, the break sometimes does not heal and surgery is required.[2] In athletes or if the pieces of bone are separated surgery may be considered sooner.[4][7] The fracture was first described in 1902 by orthopedic surgeon Robert Jones who sustained the injury while dancing.[10][3]

Diagnosis

Anatomy of the fifth metatarsal.

A person with a Jones fracture may not realize that a fracture has occurred. Diagnosis includes the palpation of an intact peroneus brevis tendon, and demonstration of local tenderness distal to the tuberosity of the fifth metatarsal, and localized over the diaphysis of the proximal metatarsal. Bony crepitus is unusual.

This injury should be differentiated from the developmental apophysis (5th metatarsal tuberosity) commonly and normally occurring at this site in adolescents. Differentiation is possible by characteristics such as absence of sclerosis of the fractured edges (in acute cases) and orientation of the lucent line: transverse (at 90 degrees) to the metatarsal axis for the fracture (due to avulsion pull by the peroneus brevis muscle inserting at the proximal tip) - and parallel to the metatarsal axis in the case of the apophysis. Diagnostic x-rays include anteroposterior, oblique, and lateral views and should be made with the foot in full flexion.

Differential diagnosis

Pseudo-Jones fracture

Other proximal fifth metatarsal fractures exist, although they are not as severe as a Jones fracture. If the fracture enters the intermetatarsal joint, it is a Jones fracture. If, however, it enters the tarsometatarsal joint, then it is an avulsion fracture caused by pull from the peroneus brevis. An avulsion fracture is sometimes called a Pseudo-Jones fracture or a Dancer's fracture.

Treatment

Casting

Initial treatment is typically in a cast, without any weight being placed on it, for at least six weeks.[4] If after this period of time healing has not occurred a further six weeks of casting may be recommended.[4] Up to half, however may not heal after casting.[1]

Surgery

In athletes or if the pieces of bone are separated by more than 2 mm surgery may be considered.[4][7] Otherwise surgery is recommended if healing does not occur after 12 weeks of casting.[4]

Prognosis

For several reasons, a Jones fracture may not unite. The diaphyseal bone (zone II), where the fracture occurs, is an area of potentially poor blood supply, existing in a watershed area between two blood supplies. This may compromise healing. In addition, there are various tendons, including the peroneus brevis and fibularis tertius, and two small muscles attached to the bone. These may pull the fracture apart and prevent healing.

Zones I and III have been associated with relatively guaranteed union and this union has taken place with only limited restriction of activity combined with early immobilization. On the other hand, zone II has been associated with either delayed or non-union and, consequently, it has been generally agreed that fractures in this area should be considered for some form of internal immobilization, such as internal screw fixation.

These zones can be identified anatomically and on x-ray adding to the clinical usefulness of this classification.[11] It should be emphasized that surgical intervention is not, by itself, a guarantee of cure and has its own complication rate. Other reviews of the literature have concluded that conservative, non-operative, treatment is an acceptable option for the non-athlete.[12]

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 Eltorai, Adam E. M.; Eberson, Craig P.; Daniels, Alan H. (2017). Orthopedic Surgery Clerkship: A Quick Reference Guide for Senior Medical Students. Springer. pp. 395–397. ISBN 9783319525679. Archived from the original on 2017-10-15.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 "Toe and Forefoot Fractures". OrthoInfo - AAOS. June 2016. Archived from the original on 16 October 2017. Retrieved 15 October 2017.
  3. 1 2 3 Valderrabano, Victor; Easley, Mark (2017). Foot and Ankle Sports Orthopaedics. Springer. p. 430. ISBN 9783319157351. Archived from the original on 2017-10-15.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Bica, D; Sprouse, RA; Armen, J (1 February 2016). "Diagnosis and Management of Common Foot Fractures". American Family Physician. 93 (3): 183–91. PMID 26926612.
  5. 1 2 Dähnert, Wolfgang (2011). Radiology Review Manual. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. p. 96. ISBN 9781609139438. Archived from the original on 2017-10-15.
  6. Conaghan, Philip G.; O'Connor, Philip; Isenberg, David A. (2010). Musculoskeletal Imaging. OUP Oxford. p. 231. ISBN 9780191575273. Archived from the original on 2017-10-15.
  7. 1 2 3 Joel A. DeLisa; Bruce M. Gans; Nicholas E. Walsh (2005). Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation: Principles and Practice. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. pp. 881–. ISBN 978-0-7817-4130-9. Archived from the original on 2017-01-07.
  8. Mattu, Amal; Chanmugam, Arjun S.; Swadron, Stuart P.; Tibbles, Carrie; Woolridge, Dale; Marcucci, Lisa (2012). Avoiding Common Errors in the Emergency Department. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. p. 790. ISBN 9781451152852. Archived from the original on 2017-10-16.
  9. Lee, Edward (2017). Pediatric Radiology: Practical Imaging Evaluation of Infants and Children. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. p. Chapter 24. ISBN 9781496380272. Archived from the original on 2017-10-15.
  10. Jones, Robert (Jun 1902). "I. Fracture of the Base of the Fifth Metatarsal Bone by Indirect Violence". Ann Surg. 35 (6): 697–700. PMC 1425723. PMID 17861128.
  11. Polzer H, Polzer S, Mutschler W, Prall WC (Oct 2012). "Acute fractures to the proximal fifth metatarsal bone: development of classification and treatment recommendations based on the current evidence". Injury. 43 (10): 1626–32. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2012.03.010. PMID 22465516.
  12. Dean BJ, Kothari A, Uppal H, Kankate R (Aug 2012). "The jones fracture classification, management, outcome, and complications: a systematic review". Foot Ankle Spec. 5 (4): 256–9. doi:10.1177/1938640012444730. PMID 22547534.
Classification
External resources
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.