Kokota language

Kokota has five vowel phonemes as shown in the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA) chart below and uses no phonemic diphthongs.[1]^:14 There are two front vowels, /i/ and /e/, one central vowel, /a/, and two back vowels: a maximally rounded /u/ and a slightly rounded /o/.[1]^:14

Kokota doesn’t contain any phonemic diphthongs; however they do occur in normal speech. Only certain vowel sequences are eligible for diphthonisation. Sequences may only diphthongise if the second vowel present is higher than the first. Front-back and back-front movements are not eligible to become diphthongs. This leaves six diphthongs able to occur (Palmer 1999:21–22): /ae/, /ai/, /ao/, /au/, /ei/ and /ou/. Diphthongisation is also not restricted by morpheme boundaries. Thus, any sequence of eligible vowels may diphthongise.

Kokota orthography is heavily influenced by that of Cheke Holo. For instance, glottal stops are not phonemic in Kokota but are often written with an apostrophe (as in Cheke Holo) when they occur in certain nondistinctive environments, such as to mark morpheme boundaries between neighboring vowels. Similarly, Cheke Holo distinguishes j and z but Kokota does not. Nevertheless, Kokota speakers tend to use either letter to write phonemic /z/. The macron is used to write the voiced velar plosive /ɡ/ and the velar nasal /ŋ/.

Most consonants distinguish voiceless and voiced versions (left and right respectively in each cell in the table). Kokota presents a rather uncommon set of consonant phonemes in that each and every phoneme exists in a pair with its voiced or voiceless opposite. There are 22 consonant phonemes in total – 11 place and manner pairs of voiced and voiceless (Palmer 1999:12) and five contrastive manners[1]^:5. Two are obstruent classes which are fricative and plosive and three are sonorant classes which are lateral, nasal, and rhotic.[3] Its six fricative phonemes make Kokota a relative outlier in Oceanic, where 2-3 fricatives are usual.[4] The amount of voiced and voiceless consonants and vowels is nearly equal with the percentage being 52% voiced and 48% voiceless.[3]

Kokota uses three types of syllable structure for the most part: V, CV, and CCV. Most (88% of 746 syllables examined) are CV (V and CCV each represent 6%). However, there are also rare cases where a CCVV or CVV syllable may occur. Thus, Kokota structure is: (C)(C)V(V).[1]^:20 Final consonant codas usually occur only in words borrowed from another language.[1]^:20 The CCVV structure is extremely rare as Kokota does not use phonemic 'diphthongs' and the term simply refers to 2 vowels occurring in sequence in a single syllable. [1]^:14 In CC initial syllables, the first consonant (C1) must be an obstruent or fricative, specifically: the labial plosives /p/, /b/, velar plosives /k/, /g/, labial fricatives /f/, /v/, or coronal fricatives /s/, /z/. The second consonant (C2) must be a voiced coronal sonorant ( /ɾ/, /l/, or /n/). The table below illustrates the possible CC onset cluster pairings. [1]^:21

The table below contains representations of the basic, productive syllable structures in Kokota.

Kokota uses trochaic stress patterns (stressed-unstressed in sequence, counting from the left edge of a word). Stress in the language varies widely among speakers, but there are patterns to the variation. Three main factors contribute to this variability: the limited morphology of Kokota, the fact some words are irregular by nature, and finally because of the present transition in stress assignment. The language is currently in a period of transition as it moves from relying on stress assignment based on moras and moves to stress assignment by syllable. The age of the speaker is a defining factor in stress use as members of older generations assign stress based on weight while younger generations assign stress based on syllables, placing main stress on the leftmost syllable of the word. [1]^:30

Words can be divided into syllables (σ) and feet (φ) and syllables may be divided further into moras (μ). Two moras grouped together comprise a foot. An important restriction on foot formation in Kokota is that their construction cannot split moras of the same syllable. For example, a word that has three syllables CV.CV.CVV has four moras CV, CV, CV, V. These moras are split into two feet: [CV.CV] and [CVV].[1]^:31

Assigning stress based on mora uses bimoraic feet to determine where a word receives stress. In CVV.CV words like /bae.su/ ('shark') the syllables are split as bae and su. The word subdivides into three moras: ba, e, su. The first two moras ba and e become Foot 1 and su is a 'left-over' mora. The first mora is stressed (ba), though in speech the whole syllable receives stress so bae is stressed in this word (see below where the stressed syllable is bolded).[1]^:33

                                     baesu
                                     φ: bae,         -
                                     σ: bae,         su
                                     μ: ba, e,       su

In contrast, a younger speaker of Kokota would assign stress based on bisyllabic feet. Following the syllable structure above, bae is again the stressed syllable but this is simply coincidental as stress is assigned to the first syllable (of the two: bae.su). This coincidence will not always be the case as demonstrated in the next example, below.

CV.CVV words like /ka.lae/ ('reef') show more complex stress assignment. 'ka.lae' has three moras: ka, la, e and two syllables: ka, lae. For older speakers, the feet are assigned differently than in bae.su because ordinary foot assignment would take the first two moras and thus would split the lae syllable. Since this is impossible, foot assignment begins with the second mora and thus the first foot is lae and stress falls on the first mora of that foot (and the rest of the syllable).[1]^:33

                                     kalae
                                     φ: - ,     la e
                                     σ: ka,     la e
                                     μ: ka,     la,  e

A younger speaker uses the simpler, syllable-based foot parsing: stress thus falls on the first syllable ka while the second syllable lae is unstressed.

In the Kokota language there are two layers to the verb complex: an inner layer and an outer layer. The inner layer is the verb core which is transparent to any sentence modifiers. The outer layer can alter the verb core all together. Constituent modifiers can modify the verb complex in a sentence in addition to the inner and outer layers of verb complexes.[3]

Compound verbs stem from multiple verbs. The left-hand root is the verb and the right-hand can be a noun, verb, or adjective. The phrase all together acts as a verb phrase.[3]

Table retrieved from, Kokota Grammar by Bill Palmer, Honolulu, US: University of Hawaii Press, 2008.[3]

Kokomo shows full and partial reduplication of disyllabic roots.[3]

In some cases partial reduplication shows the change of a noun to a verb; nouns from verbs; slight noun from noun differentiation; slight verb from verb differentiation; derived form of a habitual, ongoing, or diminutive event.

Tables retrieved from, Kokota Grammar by Bill Palmer, Honolulu, US: University of Hawaii Press, 2008.[3]

There is only a small number of full reduplication of disyllabic roots in the Kokota language. Below are examples of full reduplication where the relationship is idiosyncratic:

Tables retrieved from, Kokota Grammar by Bill Palmer, Honolulu, US: University of Hawaii Press, 2008.[3]

One example shows full reduplication deriving verbs from transitive roots, and nouns from verbs:

Tables retrieved from, Kokota Grammar by Bill Palmer, Honolulu, US: University of Hawaii Press, 2008.[3]

Equative clauses represent a characteristic of the subject in the sentence. In the Kokota language moods are unmarked. In equatives, the subject agreement component in verb clauses are excluded.[3]

When telling the time; time is the subject. Telling time smaller than an hour is expressed by a NP that expresses the minutes numerically attached to a possessor that expresses the hour. Using the terms like ‘half past’ or ‘quarter to’ cannot be determined in Kokota language.[3]

Table retrieved from, Kokota Grammar by Bill Palmer, Honolulu, US: University of Hawaii Press, 2008.[3]

The topicalized subject in Kokota language is in the preverbal position. Any subject can be tropicalized but rarely in natural conversation.[3]

Table retrieved from, Kokota Grammar by Bill Palmer, Honolulu, US: University of Hawaii Press, 2008.[3]

Below is a table of the breakdown position occurrence of the first 100 verbal clauses in a normal text:

Table retrieved from, Kokota Grammar by Bill Palmer, Honolulu, US: University of Hawaii Press, 2008.[3]

By adding two clitics on to the root noun /dadara/, Kokota specifies who possesses it as well as its proximity, as shown in the gloss below.[1]^:85

The gloss of /dadaraḡuine/ is:

/Dadara/ is the root meaning 'blood'; /gu/ indicates 1^st person singular possessive ("my").[1]^:85

A more complex form of cliticization occurs in the example sentence below:[1]^:68

(Notes: the standing stones 'titili' have spiritual significance; NT is the indicator of neutral modality; CNT is continuous; NV refers to something that is not visible)[1]^:xxi

Partial reduplication in Kokota generally derives nouns from verbs. Below are two examples:[1]^:26

Both endocentric and exocentric compounding occur.

Endocentric compounding in Kokota results in words that serve the grammatical purpose that one of its constituent words does. There are three examples below.

Exocentric compounding in Kokota results in words that do not serve the grammatical purpose that any of the constituent words do. There are two examples below.

There exist four sets of pronominal forms: preverbal subject indexed auxiliaries, post verbal object indexing, possessor indexing and independent pronouns (Palmer 1999:65). Complying with typical Oceanic features, Kokota distinguishes between four person categories: first person inclusive, first person exclusive, second person, and third person. The preverbal subject indexing auxiliaries do not differentiate between singular and plural, whereas possessor and postverbal object indexing do – except in first person inclusive, where no singular is possible (Palmer 1999:65).

The preverbal subject-indexing pronouns do not distinguish number (Palmer 1999:65).

The object-indexing pronouns are postverbal clitics (Palmer 1999:65).

The possessor-indexing pronouns are suffixed to nouns (Palmer 1999:65).

The independent pronouns, however, go one step further and differentiate between singular, dual, trial and plural numbers (Palmer 1999:65).

Similarly to many Oceanic languages, Kokota makes the distinction between alienable possession and inalienable possession.

Inalienable possession consists of possessor indexing enclitics attaching to the nominal core of the possessed noun phrase as follows (Palmer 1999:121)):

Alienable possession is formed with a possessive base that is indexed to the possessor. This entire unit precedes the possessed noun phrase. Alienable possession is further broken down into two categories, consumable, whose base is ge-, and non-consumable, whose base is no- (Palmer 1999:121).

In Kokota negative construction is expressed in two ways. [5] One way is through the use of the negative particle ti and the other way is by the means of the subordinating construction that involves the negative existential verb teo meaning ‘not exist’/ ‘be.not’. [5]

Negation is constructed when an auxiliary verb is suffixed with the negative participle ti.[6] When the negative particle ti is suffixed onto the auxiliary, it creates a single complex auxiliary as the particle ti also combines with other tense and aspect particles.[6] Depending on the clause type the negative particle ti can occur with or without the subordinating construction to instigate negation in a clause. [6]

The negative particle ti can be used to express negation in many types of clauses including the ‘be thus’ clause, nominal clauses and with equative predicates. [6]

When the negative particle ti is situated in a ‘be thus’ clause the particle ti suffixes itself onto the auxiliary in the verb complex of the ‘be thus’ clause.[6] The verb complex within the ‘be thus’ clause consist of the single worded verb -u ‘be thus’, the auxiliary, tense and aspect particles.[6] Below is an example that shows how it is done.

This example shows how the negative particle ti is suffixed onto the irrealis auxiliary o and also attached to the ‘be thus’ verb -u to negate the verb complex.

When the negative particle ti expresses negation is it usually suffixed onto the auxiliary verb in the nominalised clause. [6] Below is an example of ti in a nominalised clause.

In this example, the particle ti is not suffixed onto an auxiliary. This is because the auxiliary is an irrealis as this is discussing the past.[7] Irrealis auxiliaries are omittable parts of Kokota speech when there is no ambiguity.[8] As this example is not ambiguous, the irrealis auxiliary is omitted.  

The formation of a negative equatives predicates is similar to the ‘be thus’ clause and nominalised clause where the negative particle is suffixed onto the auxiliary of the verb complex. This is demonstrated below.

Negation in imperative clauses can be expressed by the negative particle ti or the subordinating construction.[6] However, it is more common to use the negative particle ti to construct negation in an imperative clause as is the most frequently used and preferred strategy. [9] Below is an example of how it is done.

Negation is expressed through the subordinating construction involves the negative existential verb teo. [9] This subordinating construction is commonly used to negate declarative clauses. [9]

The negative existential verb teo expresses ‘not exist’/ ‘be.not’ and it is the antonym of the positive existential verb au, meaning ‘exist’.[10] Unlike the positive existential verb au that has both locative and existential functions, teo can only function in an existential sense.[10] Below are examples of negation using the negative existential verb teo:

In the example above, there is a locative adjunct present. However, it does not modify teo as it is apart of a relative clause. [10] The more literal translation of the example would be ‘Someone who looks after the Government’s law in our village does not exist’. [10] So, the main clause expresses that absence of the subject's as an entity, rather than the subject not being in the location of the village. [10]

The negative existential verb teo is unlike the au as it does not have a locative function.[10] To express that an entity has no presence in a location involves the subordinating construction.[10] Below are two examples. Example 7 exhibits how au functions when in a locative sense. Whereas, Example 8 exhibits the subordinating construction involving teo to show non-presence in a location.

Negation is expressed in a declarative clause through subordinating construction.[9] Through this process the declarative clause becomes a subordinated positive declarative clause which complements the negative existential verb teo.[9] Below is an example of a negatived declarative clause.

In this example the subordinated positive declarative clause has been bracketed to show its placement in the main clause in relation to the negative existential verb teo. [11]