Treaty 6

Treaty 6
Treaty No. 6 between Her Majesty the Queen and the Plain and Wood Cree Indians and other Tribes of Indians at Fort Carlton, Fort Pitt and Battle River with Adhesions
The Numbered Treaties
Signed August 23 and 28 and September 9, 1876
Location Fort Carlton, Fort Pitt
Parties
Language English

Treaty 6 is the sixth of seven numbered treaties that were signed by the Canadian Crown and various First Nations between 1871 and 1877. Specifically, Treaty 6 is an agreement between the Crown and the Plains and Woods Cree, Assiniboine, and other band governments at Fort Carlton and Fort Pitt. Key figures, representing the Crown, involved in the negotiations were Alexander Morris, Lieutenant Governor of the North-West Territories; James McKay, The Minister of Agriculture for Manitoba; and W.J. Christie the Chief Factor of the Hudson's Bay Company. Chief Mistawasis and Chief Ahtahkakoop represented the Carlton Cree.[1] Treaty 6 included terms that had not been incorporated into Treaties 1 to 5, including a medicine chest at the house of the Indian agent on the reserve, protection from famine and pestilence, more agricultural implements, and on-reserve education. The area agreed upon by the Plains and Woods Cree represents most of the central area of the current provinces of Saskatchewan and Alberta. The treaty signings began on 18 August 1876 and ran until 9 September 1876. Additional adhesions were added later, including one Manitoba band in 1898, and, later that year, the last was signed in the Montreal Lake area. Since Treaty 6 has been signed, there have been many claims over miscommunication of the treaty terms from the Indigenous and the Crown's perspective. This misunderstanding has led to disagreements between the Indigenous peoples and the government over the different interpretations of the treaty terms.[2] Treaty 6 is still active today and a Treaty 6 Recognition Day is now celebrated annually since its creation in 2013 when the City of Edmonton created it to remember the signing in 1876.

Reasons

The Indigenous peoples from the northern plains of the North-West Territories, the Cree, Ojibwa and Assiniboine, were interested to negotiate a treaty with the government in 1871 to ensure the protection of their lands from settlers and surveyors as they feared their lands would be taken over.[3] Considering the sale of the North-West Territories to the Canadian government from the Hudson's Bay Company, the Indigenous peoples were concerned about entering into a treaty with the Canadian government as they did not want their land to be taken over.[4] As treaties made their way slowly towards the North-West, the pressures of the Indigenous peoples on the government to make treaties increased. Lieutenant Governor Alexander Morris proposed the government make a treaty in the west in 1872, but the suggestion was dismissed.[4] The Cree were told by traders each year that a treaty would be made with them soon to discuss their concerns, but years passed, and the government made no effort to create a treaty.[5] The government was uninterested in negotiating a treaty with the Indigenous peoples at the time, but as a result of the governments disinterest, the Cree peoples stopped letting surveyors onto their territory as well as stopped telegraph workers from creating a line from Winnipeg to Edmonton. These events eventually caught the attention of the government as the government did not want a war with the Indigenous peoples for they wanted immigration to the North-West to continue and a war would certainly halt settlement.[6] This began the negotiations for Treaty 6 at Fort Carlton.

The Crown, recognizing the right of Natives as possessors of the land due to occupancy and possession, wanted access to the land to open it to European Settlers (farmers, businessman and missionaries). As well, the signing of the treaty was a product of the British Empire's long-continuing colonialism of British North America. There were several impetuses for this colonization: political, social (over-population in Britain and need to export people out of British slums) and economic (profit to be made from western Canada's rich lands and woodlands) at the time. Many of the persons involved in the process of imposing treaty on the Nations had had experience in imposing British rule on nations in Africa and central Asia.

At this time, the buffalo were disappearing at an alarming rate. The over hunting of the buffalo was caused by the European settlers, Metis and Indigenous peoples as the settlers were using the buffalos mostly for their hide, whereas the Indigenous peoples were hunting them mostly as their primary food source. Due to the increasing numbers of people hunting the buffalo, the main concern of the Indigenous peoples were that the buffalo would become extinct which would lead their population towards starvation as the buffalo was their main source of food.[3] The chiefs, elders and many of the people themselves hoped that, if they signed a treaty with the Crown, they would not starve. Seeking assistance from the government through a treaty was the Indigenous peoples only way of guaranteeing their population would be helped, lessening their chance of starvation.[3]

A pile of buffalo skulls in the 1870s

A second major reason for the signing of the treaty was that smallpox, recently introduced by settlers, had spread through the area, killing many of the Cree who had no immunity to this new disease. This weakened the spirit of the nations that might have otherwise opposed such an agreement.

Lieutenant Governor Alexander Morris advised the government in 1872 to negotiate a treaty with the Indigenous peoples in the North-West. Many years later he received authorization from the government to send the Reverend George McDougall to inform the Cree that a treaty would be negotiated at Fort Carlton and Fort Pitt during the summer of 1876. Lieutenant Governor Morris was situated at Fort Garry and left on 27 July 1876 to make his way to Fort Carlton to negotiate a treaty with the Cree peoples. Morris was joined by W.J. Christie, Dr. Jackes, and was to meet James McKay at Fort Carlton. Alexander Morris and his team arrived at Fort Carlton on 15 August, and met with the chiefs of the Carlton Cree, Mistawasis and Ahtukukoop.[7] On August 18, negotiations began after attempting to include the Duck Lake Indigenous peoples into the treaty.[8]

Terms

The government used the Robinson Treaties as an outline for Treaty 6 and all the numbered treaties. The Indigenous peoples involved in the Robinson Treaties were given money plus additional annual payments. They were given land for reserves and given the right to hunt and fish on the land they used to own unless the land was sold or occupied. However, despite the Robinson Treaties serving as an outline, the Indigenous peoples of Treaty 6 negotiated additional terms into their treaty which the government did not intend to include.[3]

According to the European version of history and terms of Treaty Making, the First Nations people gave up their customary title to the land under common law in exchange for provisions from the government. The First Nations understanding is radically different from the British version; due to the nature of oral histories, translations (for example there is no concept of "land ownership" or "cede", which follows from the concept of land ownership, in the Cree language), and British customs, there continues to be a controversy as to possible different understanding of the terms as they were used at the time of the Treaty signings, creating no consensus ad idem, and subsequently leading to an invalid contract.

The Plain and Wood Cree Tribes of Indians, and all other the Indians inhabiting the district hereinafter described and defined, do hereby cede, release, surrender and yield up to the Government of the Dominion of Canada, for Her Majesty the Queen and Her successors forever, all their rights, titles and privileges, whatsoever, to the lands included within the following limits...[9]

During the treaty negotiations the Indigenous peoples requested for agricultural tools, animals such as an ox and a cow for each family, assistance for the poor and those unable to work, the ban of alcohol in the province of Saskatchewan, and education to be provided for each reserve. In addition, the Indigenous peoples asked to be able to change the location of their settlement before the land was surveyed, ability to take resources from Crown lands such as timber, cooking stoves, medicine, a hand mill, access to bridges, and in the event of war the ability to refuse to serve.[10]

In exchange, for Indigenous lands, the federal government agreed to set up certain areas as "reserves" (i.e. protected from encroachment by white settlers). These lands no longer belong to the Indigenous peoples despite them living on it. The lands on which the Indigenous peoples lived, can be taken or sold by the government, but only with the consent of the natives peoples, or with compensation. In addition, the government promised to open schools for Indigenous children. Each reserve was to receive a school house, which would be built by the government. The idea of giving the Indigenous peoples an education was an attempt to help them become more successful in terms of communication with the settlers. It was also an attempt to help the Indigenous community understand how the Europeans lived, and to use their ways of living to help the Indigenous population thrive.[11] However, education was optional on reserves for the beginning of the treaty. The federal government offered education if the Indigenous peoples should desire it, but it was not mandatory. Nevertheless, not long after the treaty was signed, Indigenous children were being forced to attend school despite the treaty stating that it was optional for children to attend.[12] The sale of alcohol, or fire water as the Indigenous call it, was also restricted on reserves.

The terms of Treaty 6 gave every family of five living on the reserve one square mile. Smaller families received land according to the size of their family. Each person immediately received CA$$12 and an additional $5 a year. A maximum of four chiefs and other officers per band would receive $15 each and a salary of $25 per year plus one horse, one harness, and one wagon[13] or two carts. The Indigenous peoples also received a $1500 grant every year to spend on ammunition and twine in order to make fish nets. As well, each family was to be given an entire suite of agricultural tools including spades, harrows, scythes, whetstones, hay forks, reaping hooks, ploughs, axes, hoes, and several bags of seed. They were also to acquire a cross-cut saw, a hand saw, and a pit-saw, files, a grindstone, an auger, and a trunk of carpenter's tools. Additionally, they were to receive wheat, barley, potatoes, oats, as well as four oxen, a bull, six cows, two sows, and a hand-mill.[13] These were all included in Treaty 6 in hopes that the Indigenous peoples would use these tools to create a living for themselves.

Pipe ceremony

Pipe ceremony at Waterhen River, northern Saskatchewan

Religious practices are just as important to the Indigenous people as the serious discussions and decisions made. The pipe ceremony in the Indigenous community is something of sacred significance. It is associated with honour and pride and is conducted for both parties involved in an agreement to keep to their word. It is believed that the truth must only be told when the pipe is in attendance.[8] The smoking of the pipe was conducted at the negotiations of Treaty 6 to symbolize that this treaty would be honoured forever by both the Indigenous peoples and the Crown. It was also to indicate that anything said between the negotiators of the Crown and the Indigenous peoples would be honoured as well.[14] It was used at the beginning of the treaty negotiations as it was passed to Lieutenant Governor Alexander Morris who rubbed it a few times before passing it to other members of the Crown present. This ceremony was to display that the negotiators of the Crown accepted the friendship of the Indigenous peoples, which signalled the start of the negotiations.[15] It is also the Indigenous way to signal the completion of an agreement between parties to guarantee each other's words. Due to the contrast of beliefs between the Indigenous and the Crown, the Crown did not see this ceremony as significant as the Indigenous people did. The negotiators of the Crown did not realize that this ceremony was of sacred importance to the Indigenous population which made their words and agreements mean much more to the Indigenous peoples than it did to the negotiators and the Crown. Spoken agreements to the Indigenous peoples have the same importance as written agreements do.[16]

Miscommunication

Lieutenant Governor Alexander Morris

The Government of Canada believes the terms of the treaty were written down clearly within the document, but due to the oral traditions of the Indigenous peoples, they have a different understanding of the treaty terms.[17] Although there were three interpreters presents at the negotiations for Treaty 6, two from the Crown and one from the Indigenous peoples, direct translation of words between English and Cree was not possible. Certain words in either language did not have a corresponding word in the opposite language. This meant that both groups did not understand each other fully as the concepts were changed due to the word changes between the languages. The Indigenous peoples had to especially rely on their interpreter because the document they were to sign was solely in English, giving them the disadvantage as the interpreter had to explain the words, meanings and concepts of the treaty text because the Cree could not speak or read English.[18] The Indigenous peoples claim they accepted Treaty 6 because they were informed that the Crown did not want to buy their land, but instead borrow it.[19] Another understanding was that the Indigenous peoples could chose the amount of land they wanted to retain, but surveyors came to set per person perimeters on the reserves which was seen as a violation of the treaty.[2] Indigenous peoples thought the treaty would adapt due to the changing conditions such as the amount of currency, the drastic change in health services, and the more efficient agricultural tools which have been invented or modified to better suit the conditions of farming. However, the treaty terms have remained the same which have caused Indigenous peoples to believe the treaty terms should be re-evaluated to better suit the needs of Indigenous people today.[20]

Alexander Morris emphasized that the Queen had sent him as she wanted peace within Canada, and for all her children to be happy and well taken care of.[21] The Indigenous peoples were affected by this statement as women in their culture are seen as having a more important role than men. This belief is implemented into Indigenous people's political roles which is the reason why women do not negotiate as the land is seen as the women's, therefore if women do not negotiate then the land can never fully be surrendered.[22] The reoccurring image of the Queen and her children was a main reason for the Indigenous peoples to sign Treaty 6. They believed the Queen, as a woman, was not taking away their land but only sharing it. The phrase "for as long as the sun shines and the waters flow" was used in ensuring that this treaty would last forever. The Crown interpreted the water to be the rivers and lakes, however the Indigenous peoples saw the water to mean the birth of a child and as long as children were being born then the treaty would remain.[11]

Medicine Chest Clause

One of the selling points of the treaty was that a medicine chest would be kept at the home of the Indian agent for use by the people. Another of the selling points was the guarantee of assistance for famine or pestilence relief.

The "medicine chest clause" has been interpreted by native leaders to mean that the federal government has an obligation to provide all forms of healthcare to First Nations people on an ongoing basis. In particular, the Assembly of First Nations considers the funding of the Non-Insured Health Benefits program as one aspect of this responsibility.[23]

At the time Treaty 6 was signed, the famous medicine chest clause was inserted at Indian insistence that the Indian agent should keep a medicine chest at his house for use. Today Indian thinking is this means medical care, in general terms, the medicine chest may be all they had at that time and place but today we have a broader range of medical care and this is a symbol for that.

historian John Taylor[24]

The interpretation of that clause is very different for the federal government employees or bureaucrats and the Indian leadership because to us and to our elders and leaders who negotiated and signed that treaty, it refers to health care and health benefits for our people. And because our traditional way of healing is still present and alive but we recognized that we would need that assistance

Notable scholars and esteemed academics submit that the medicine chest clause was a precursor to the current healthcare system engrained in Canadian culture.

Indigenous news website The Feather [25]

Signatories

Signatures of the document include the Cree tribe and the Canadian gouvernment

List of Treaty 6 First Nations

Timeline

Date Event
23 August 1876 First signing at Fort Carlton
28 August 1876 Second signing at Fort Carlton
9 September 1876 Fort Pitt signing
9 August 1877 Fort Pitt adhesion signing by Cree bands
21 August 1877 Fort Edmonton signing
25 September 1877 Blackfoot Crossing at Bow River signing (at Siksika Nation reserve, Alberta)
19 August 1878 Additional signing
29 August 1878 Battleford signing
3 September 1878 Carlton signing
18 September 1878 Additional signing, Michel Calihoo Band, 25,600 acres near Edmonton, Alberta[26]
2 July 1879 Fort Walsh signing
8 December 1882 Further Fort Walsh signing
11 February 1889 Montreal Lake signing
10 August 1898 Colomb band signing in Manitoba
25 May 1944 Rocky Mountain House adhesion signing
13 May 1950 Further Rocky Mountain House adhesion signing
21 November 1950 Witchekan Lake signing
18 August 1954 Cochin signing
15 May 1956 Further Cochin signing
1958 Members of the Michel Band are "enfranchised" by the Department of Indian Affairs. They were made into British citizens and lost their Treaty status. And the reserve is dissolved.

This is the only case of an entire band (save a few individuals) being involuntarily enfranchised. [27]

Confederacy of Treaty Six First Nations

The Confederacy of Treaty Six First Nations was created in the spring of 1993 by 17 of Treaty Six band governments to be the "united political voice" of the Treaty Six First Nations.[28]

On 6 July 2012, the City of Edmonton, represented by Mayor Stephen Mandel signed a partnership agreement with the Confederacy. This believed to be the first such agreement between a city in Alberta and a group of First Nations governments. Edmonton is within Treaty 6 territory and has the second largest Aboriginal population of any municipality in Canada.[29]

See also

References

  1. Chalmers, John W. (Spring 1977). "Treaty No. Six". Alberta History. 25: 23.
  2. 1 2 Asch, Michael (2008). "Aboriginal and Treaty Rights in Canada; Essays on Law, Equality, and Respect for Difference". UBC Press: 197.
  3. 1 2 3 4 Leonard Taylor, John (1985). "Treaty Research Report Treaty Six". Treaties and Historical Research Centre Indian and Northern Affairs Canada: 4.
  4. 1 2 Leonard Taylor, John (1985). "Treaty Research Report Treaty Six". Treaties and Historical Research Centre Indian and Northern Affairs Canada: 5.
  5. Leonard Taylor, John (1985). "Treaty Research Report Treaty Six". Treaties and Historical Research Centre Indian and Northern Affairs Canada.
  6. Leonard Taylor, John (1985). "Treaty Research Report Treaty Six". Treaties and Historical Research Centre Indian and Northern Affairs Canada: 3.
  7. Leonard Taylor, John (1985). "Treaty Research Report Treaty Six". Treaties and Historical Research Centre Indian and Northern Affairs Canada: 9.
  8. 1 2 Leonard Taylor, John (1985). "Treaty Research Report Treaty Six". Treaties and Historical Research Centre Indian and Northern Affairs Canada: 10.
  9. http://www.aadnc-aandc.gc.ca/eng/1100100028710/1100100028783
  10. Leonard Taylor, John (1985). "Treaty Research Report Treaty Six". Treaties and Historical Research Centre Indian and Northern Affairs Canada: 17.
  11. 1 2 Asch, Michael (2008). "Aboriginal and Treaty Rights in Canada: Essays on Law, Equality, and Respect for Difference". UBC Press: 194.
  12. Chalmers, John W. (Spring 1977). "Treaty No. Six". Alberta History. 25: 26.
  13. 1 2 Chalmers, John W. (Spring 1977). "Treaty No. Six". Alberta History. 25: 25.
  14. Asch, Michael (2008). "Aboriginal and Treaty Rights in Canada: Essays on Law, Equality, and Respect for Difference". UBC Press: 188.
  15. Chalmers W., John (Spring 1977). "Treaty No. Six". Alberta History. 25: 24.
  16. Wing, Miriam Lily (November 2016). "Divisions in Treaty 6 Perspectives: The Dilemma of Written Text and Oral Tradition". MUSe3. 1: 204.
  17. Wing, Miriam Lily (November 2016). "Divisions in Treaty 6 Perspectives: The Dilemma of Written Text and Oral Tradition". https://journals.macewan.ca/muse/article/view/220/1009. 1: 204. External link in |journal= (help)
  18. Whitehouse-Strong, Derek (Winter 2007). "Indian Reserve Farming and the Spirit and Intent of Treaty Six Reconsidered". Great Plains Quarterly: 30.
  19. Wing, Miriam Lily (November 2016). "Divisions in Treaty 6 Perspectives: The Dilemma of Written Text and Oral Tradition". MUSe3. 1: 206.
  20. Chalmers, John W. (Spring 1977). "Treaty No. Six". Alberta History. 25: 27.
  21. Asch, Michael (2008). "Aboriginal and Treaty Rights in Canada: Essays on Law, Equality, and Respect for Difference". UBC Press: 190.
  22. Asch, Michael (2008). "Aboriginal and Treaty Rights in Canada: Essays on Law, Equality, and Respect for Difference". UBC Press: 191.
  23. "NIHB". Program Areas. Assembly of First Nations. Retrieved 10 December 2014.
  24. 1 2 "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 15 April 2012. Retrieved 15 April 2012.
  25. "Canada Finally Ready To Admit That Indigenous People Came Up With The Idea For Universal Healthcare". News. The Feather News Network. Retrieved 3 August 2018.
  26. Dalheim, K (1955). Calahoo Trails. Calahoo Women's Institute. p. 14.
  27. Friends of the Michel Society 1958 Enfranchisement Claim
  28. "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 31 August 2013. Retrieved 2 March 2013.
  29. "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 15 June 2013. Retrieved 2 March 2013.

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.