Children of Men

Children of Men
A man is shown from shoulder-up standing behind a glass pane with his head visible through a hole in the glass. A tagline reads, "The year 2027: The last days of the human race. No child has been born for 18 years. He must protect our only hope."
Theatrical release poster
Directed by Alfonso Cuarón
Produced by
Screenplay by
Based on The Children of Men
by P. D. James
Starring
Music by John Tavener
Cinematography Emmanuel Lubezki
Edited by
Production
companies
Distributed by Universal Studios
Release date
  • 3 September 2006 (2006-09-03) (Venice)
  • 22 September 2006 (2006-09-22) (United Kingdom)
  • 25 December 2006 (2006-12-25) (United States)
Running time
109 minutes[1]
Country
  • United Kingdom
  • United States[2]
Language English
Budget $76 million[3]
Box office $70 million[3]

Children of Men is a 2006 British-American dystopian thriller film directed and co-written by Alfonso Cuarón. The screenplay, based on P. D. James' 1992 novel The Children of Men, was credited to five writers, with Clive Owen making uncredited contributions. The film takes place in 2027, where two decades of human infertility have left society on the brink of collapse. Illegal immigrants seek sanctuary in the United Kingdom, where the last functioning government imposes oppressive immigration laws on refugees. Owen plays civil servant Theo Faron, who must help a refugee (Clare-Hope Ashitey) escape the chaos. Children of Men also stars Julianne Moore, Michael Caine, Chiwetel Ejiofor, and Charlie Hunnam.

The film was released on 22 September 2006 in the UK and on 25 December in the U.S. Critics noted the relationship between the U.S. Christmas opening and the film's themes of hope, redemption, and faith. Despite the limited release and low earnings at the box office compared to its budget, Children of Men received critical acclaim and was recognised for its achievements in screenwriting, cinematography, art direction, and innovative single-shot action sequences. It was nominated for three Academy Awards: Best Adapted Screenplay, Best Cinematography and Best Film Editing. It was also nominated for three BAFTA Awards, winning Best Cinematography and Best Production Design, and for three Saturn Awards, winning Best Science Fiction Film.

Plot

In 2027, after 18 years of global human infertility, civilization is on the brink of collapse as humanity faces extinction. The United Kingdom, one of the very few stable nations with a functioning government, is deluged by asylum seekers fleeing the chaos and war that has taken hold around the world. In response, the UK has become a police state as the British Army rounds up and detains immigrants. Theo Faron, a former activist turned cynical bureaucrat, is kidnapped by the "Fishes", a militant immigrants' rights group. They are led by Theo's estranged wife, Julian Taylor, from whom he separated after their son Dylan's death during a 2008 flu pandemic.

Julian offers Theo money to acquire transit papers for a young refugee named Kee. Theo later obtains the papers from his cousin Nigel, a government minister who runs a state-sponsored collection of salvaged art from around the world. Since the transit papers require that the bearer be accompanied, Theo agrees to escort Kee in exchange for a large sum. Luke, a Fishes member, drives Theo, Kee, and former midwife Miriam towards Canterbury. While en route, they are ambushed by an armed gang, and Julian is killed. The group evades the police and hides Julian's body in the forest before heading to a Fishes safe house.

Kee reveals to Theo that she is pregnant and that Julian had told her to trust only Theo. Julian had intended to hand Kee to the "Human Project," a supposed scientific group in the Azores, dedicated to curing infertility. However, Luke persuades Kee to stay and is voted as the new leader of the Fishes. Later that night, Theo eavesdrops on a discussion and learns that Julian's death was orchestrated by the Fishes so Luke could become leader; they intend to kill Theo and use the baby as a political tool to support the coming revolution. Theo wakes Kee and Miriam, and they steal a car, escaping to the secluded hideaway of Theo's aging friend Jasper Palmer, a former political cartoonist turned pot dealer.

The group makes plans to board the Human Project ship, the Tomorrow, which will arrive offshore from a refugee camp at Bexhill-on-Sea. Jasper proposes getting Syd, a camp guard to whom he frequently sells drugs, to smuggle them into Bexhill, masquerading as refugees. When the Fishes discover Jasper's house, the group flees while Jasper stays behind to stall the Fishes; Luke shoots and kills Jasper as Theo watches from the woods. The group meets Syd at an abandoned school, and he helps them board a bus to Bexhill. When Kee experiences contractions while at a checkpoint, Miriam distracts a suspicious guard by feigning mania and is taken away.

Inside the camp, Theo and Kee meet a Romanian woman, Marichka, who provides a room where Kee gives birth to a baby girl. The next day, Syd informs Theo and Kee that war has broken out between the British Army and the refugees—led by the Fishes. Having learned that they have a bounty on their heads, Syd attempts to capture them, but they fight him off and escape. Amidst the fighting, the Fishes capture Kee and the baby. Theo tracks them to an apartment under heavy fire; he confronts Luke, who is then killed in an explosion, and escorts Kee and the baby out. Awed by the baby, the combatants temporarily stop fighting and allow the trio to leave. Marichka leads them to a hidden boat, but chooses to stay behind as they depart.

As aircraft bomb Bexhill from a distance, Theo reveals that he had been shot by Luke. He tells Kee how to wind/burp her baby to soothe her crying, and Kee tells Theo she will name her Dylan—after Theo and Julian's lost son. Theo loses consciousness as the Tomorrow approaches through the fog.

Cast

  • Clive Owen as Theo Faron, a former activist who was devastated when his child died during a flu pandemic.[4] Theo is the "archetypal everyman" who reluctantly becomes a saviour.[5][6] Cast in April 2005,[7] Owen spent several weeks collaborating with Cuarón and Sexton on his role. Impressed by Owen's creative insights, Cuarón and Sexton brought him on board as a writer.[8] "Clive was a big help," Cuarón told Variety. "I would send a group of scenes to him, and then I would hear his feedback and instincts."[9]
  • Julianne Moore as Julian Taylor. For Julian, Cuarón wanted an actor who had the "credibility of leadership, intelligence, [and] independence".[8] Moore was cast in June 2005, initially to play the first woman to become pregnant in 20 years.[10] "She is just so much fun to work with," Cuarón told Cinematical. "She is just pulling the rug out from under your feet all the time. You don't know where to stand, because she is going to make fun of you."[8]
  • Clare-Hope Ashitey as Kee, an illegal immigrant and the first pregnant woman in eighteen years. She did not appear in the book, and was written into the film based on Cuarón's interest in the recent single-origin hypothesis of human origins and the status of dispossessed people:[11] "The fact that this child will be the child of an African woman has to do with the fact that humanity started in Africa. We're putting the future of humanity in the hands of the dispossessed and creating a new humanity to spring out of that."[12]
  • Michael Caine as Jasper Palmer, Theo's dealer and friend. Caine based Jasper on his experiences with friend John Lennon[8]  the first time he had portrayed a character who would pass wind or smoke cannabis.[13] Cuarón explains, "Once he had the clothes and so on and stepped in front of the mirror to look at himself, his body language started changing. Michael loved it. He believed he was this guy".[13] Michael Phillips of the Chicago Tribune notices an apparent homage to Schwartz in Orson Welles' film noir, Touch of Evil (1958). Jasper calls Theo "amigo"—just as Schwartz referred to Ramon Miguel Vargas.[14] Jasper's cartoons, seen in his house, were provided by Steve Bell.
  • Chiwetel Ejiofor as Luke
  • Charlie Hunnam as Patric
  • Pam Ferris as Miriam
  • Peter Mullan as Syd
  • Danny Huston as Nigel, Theo's cousin and a high-ranking government official. Nigel runs a Ministry of Arts programme "Ark of the Arts", which "rescues" works of art such as Michelangelo's David (albeit with a broken leg), Pablo Picasso's Guernica, and Banksy's British Cops Kissing. He mentions that he tried to save Michelangelo's Pietà, but a mob destroyed it before he could.
  • Oana Pellea as Marichka
  • Paul Sharma as Ian
  • Jacek Koman as Tomasz

Themes

Hope and faith

Children of Men explores the themes of hope and faith[15] in the face of overwhelming futility and despair.[16][17] The film's source, P. D. James' novel The Children of Men (1992), describes what happens when society is unable to reproduce, using male infertility to explain this problem.[18][19] In the novel, it is made clear that hope depends on future generations. James writes, "It was reasonable to struggle, to suffer, perhaps even to die, for a more just, a more compassionate society, but not in a world with no future where, all too soon, the very words 'justice,' 'compassion,' 'society,’ 'struggle,' 'evil,' would be unheard echoes on an empty air."[20]

The film switches the infertility from male to female[17] but never explains its cause: environmental destruction and divine punishment are considered.[21] This unanswered question (and others in the film) have been attributed to Cuarón's dislike for expository film: "There's a kind of cinema I detest, which is a cinema that is about exposition and explanations ... It's become now what I call a medium for lazy readers ... Cinema is a hostage of narrative. And I'm very good at narrative as a hostage of cinema."[22] Cuarón's disdain for back-story and exposition led him to use the concept of female infertility as a "metaphor for the fading sense of hope".[17] The "almost mythical" Human Project is turned into a "metaphor for the possibility of the evolution of the human spirit, the evolution of human understanding."[23] Without dictating how the audience should feel by the end of the film, Cuarón encourages viewers to come to their own conclusions about the sense of hope depicted in the final scenes: "We wanted the end to be a glimpse of a possibility of hope, for the audience to invest their own sense of hope into that ending. So if you're a hopeful person you'll see a lot of hope, and if you're a bleak person you'll see a complete hopelessness at the end."[24]

Religion

Like Virgil's Aeneid, Dante's Divine Comedy, and Chaucer's Canterbury Tales, the crux of the journey in Children of Men lies in what is uncovered along the path rather than the terminus itself.[25] Theo's heroic journey to the south coast mirrors his personal quest for "self-awareness",[26] a journey that takes him from "despair to hope".[27]

According to Cuarón, the title of P. D. James' book (The Children of Men) is a Catholic allegory derived from a passage of scripture in the Bible.[28] (Psalm 90 (89):3 of the KJV: "Thou turnest man to destruction; and sayest, Return, ye children of men.") James refers to her story as a "Christian fable"[18] while Cuarón describes it as "almost like a look at Christianity": "I didn't want to shy away from the spiritual archetypes," Cuarón told Filmmaker Magazine. "But I wasn't interested in dealing with dogma."[24]

This divergence from the original was criticised by some, including Anthony Sacramone of First Things, who called the film "an act of vandalism", noting the irony of how Cuarón had removed religion from P.D. James' fable, in which morally sterile nihilism is overcome by Christianity.[30]

The film has been noted for its use of Christian symbolism; for example, British terrorists named "Fishes" protect the rights of refugees.[31] Opening on Christmas Day in the United States, critics compared the characters of Theo and Kee with Joseph and Mary,[32] calling the film a "modern-day Nativity story".[33] Kee's pregnancy is revealed to Theo in a barn, alluding to the manger of the Nativity scene, when Theo asks Kee who the father of the baby is she jokingly states she is a virgin, and when other characters discover Kee and her baby, they respond with "Jesus Christ" or the sign of the cross.[34] Also the Archangel Gabriel (among other religious figures) is invoked in the bus scene.

To highlight these spiritual themes, Cuarón commissioned a 15-minute piece by British composer John Tavener, a member of the Eastern Orthodox Church whose work resonates with the themes of "motherhood, birth, rebirth, and redemption in the eyes of God." Calling his score a "musical and spiritual reaction to Alfonso's film", snippets of Tavener's "Fragments of a Prayer" contain lyrics in Latin, German and Sanskrit sung by mezzo-soprano, Sarah Connolly. Words like "mata" (mother), "pahi mam" (protect me), "avatara" (saviour), and "alleluia" appear throughout the film.[35][36]

In the closing credits, the Sanskrit words "Shantih Shantih Shantih" appear as end titles.[37][38] Writer and film critic Laura Eldred of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill observes that Children of Men is "full of tidbits that call out to the educated viewer". During a visit to his house by Theo and Kee, Jasper says "Shanti, shanti, shanti." Eldred notes that the "shanti" used in the film is also found at the end of an Upanishad and in the final line of T. S. Eliot's poem The Waste Land, a work Eldred describes as "devoted to contemplating a world emptied of fertility: a world on its last, teetering legs". "Shanti" is also a common beginning and ending to all Hindu prayers, and means "peace," referencing the invocation of divine intervention and rebirth through an end to violence.[39]

Contemporary references

Children of Men takes an unconventional approach to the modern action film, using a documentary, newsreel style.[40] Film critics Michael Rowin, Jason Guerrasio and Ethan Alter observe the film's underlying touchstone of immigration. Alter notes that the film "makes a potent case against the anti-immigrant sentiment" prevalent in modern societies like the United Kingdom and the United States, with Guerrasio describing the film as "a complex meditation on the politics of today".[24][26]

For Alter and other critics, the structural support and impetus for the contemporary references rests upon the visual nature of the film's exposition, occurring in the form of imagery as opposed to conventional dialogue.[26] Visually, the refugee camps in the film intentionally evoke Abu Ghraib prison, Guantanamo Bay detention camp, and The Maze.[23] Other popular images appear, such as a sign over the refugee camp reading "Homeland Security".[41] The similarity between the hellish, cinéma vérité stylized battle scenes of the film and current news and documentary coverage of the Iraq War, is noted by film critic Manohla Dargis, describing Cuarón's fictional landscapes as "war zones of extraordinary plausibility".[42]

In the film, refugees are "hunted down like cockroaches", rounded up and put into cages and camps, and even shot, leading film critics like Chris Smith and Claudia Puig to observe symbolic "overtones" and images of the Holocaust.[16][43] This is reinforced in the scene where an elderly refugee woman speaking German is seen detained in a cage,[44] and in the scene where British Homeland Security strips and beats illegal immigrants; a song by The Libertines, "Arbeit macht frei", plays in the background.[45] "The visual allusions to the Nazi roundups are unnerving," writes Richard A. Blake. "It shows what people can become when the government orchestrates their fears for its own advantage."[25]

Cuarón explains how he uses his imagery to cross-reference fictional and futuristic events with real, contemporary, or historical incidents and beliefs:

They exit the Russian apartments, and the next shot you see is this woman wailing, holding the body of her son in her arms. This was a reference to a real photograph of a woman holding the body of her son in the Balkans, crying with the corpse of her son. It's very obvious that when the photographer captured that photograph, he was referencing La Pietà, the Michelangelo sculpture of Mary holding the corpse of Jesus. So: We have a reference to something that really happened, in the Balkans, which is itself a reference to the Michelangelo sculpture. At the same time, we use the sculpture of David early on, which is also by Michelangelo, and we have of course the whole reference to the Nativity. And so everything was referencing and cross-referencing, as much as we could.[8]

Production

The adaptation of the P. D. James novel was originally written by Paul Chart, and later rewritten by Mark Fergus and Hawk Ostby. The studio brought director Alfonso Cuarón on board in 2001.[46] Cuarón and screenwriter Timothy J. Sexton began rewriting the script after the director completed Y tu mamá también. Afraid he would "start second guessing things",[13] Cuarón chose not to read P. D. James' novel, opting to have Sexton read the book while Cuarón himself read an abridged version.[8][24] Cuarón did not immediately begin production, instead directing Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban. During this period, David Arata rewrote the screenplay and delivered the draft which secured Clive Owen and sent the film into pre-production. The director's work experience in the United Kingdom exposed him to the "social dynamics of the British psyche", giving him insight into the depiction of "British reality".[47] Cuarón used the film The Battle of Algiers as a model for social reconstruction in preparation for production, presenting the film to Clive Owen as an example of his vision for Children of Men. In order to create a philosophical and social framework for the film, the director read literature by Slavoj Žižek, as well as similar works.[48] The film Sunrise was also influential.[17]

Location

A Clockwork Orange was one of the inspirations for the futuristic, yet battered patina of 2027 London.[17] Children of Men was the second film Cuarón made in London, with the director portraying the city using single, wide shots.[49] While Cuarón was preparing the film, the London bombings occurred, but the director never considered moving the production. "It would have been impossible to shoot anywhere but London, because of the very obvious way the locations were incorporated into the film," Cuarón told Variety. "For example, the shot of Fleet Street looking towards St. Paul's would have been impossible to shoot anywhere else."[49] Due to these circumstances, the opening terrorist attack scene on Fleet Street was shot a month and a half after the London bombing.[48]

Cuarón chose to shoot some scenes in East London, a location he considered "a place without glamour". The set locations were dressed to make them appear even more run-down; Cuarón says he told the crew "'Let's make it more Mexican'. In other words, we'd look at a location and then say: yes, but in Mexico there would be this and this. It was about making the place look run-down. It was about poverty."[48] He also made use of London's most popular sites, shooting in locations like Trafalgar Square and Battersea Power Station. The power station scene (whose conversion into an art archive is a reference to the Tate Modern), has been compared to Antonioni's Red Desert.[50] Cuarón added a pig balloon to the scene as homage to Pink Floyd's Animals.[51] Other art works visible in this scene include Michelangelo's David,[25] Picasso's Guernica,[52] and Banksy's British Cops Kissing.[44] London visual effects companies Double Negative and Framestore worked directly with Cuarón from script to post production, developing effects and creating "environments and shots that wouldn't otherwise be possible".[49]

The Historic Dockyard in Chatham was used to film the scene in the empty activist safehouse.[53]

Style and design

"In most sci-fi epics, special effects substitute for story. Here they seamlessly advance it," observes Colin Covert of Star Tribune.[54] Billboards were designed to balance a contemporary and futuristic appearance as well as easily visualizing what else was occurring in the rest of the world at the time, and cars were made to resemble modern ones at first glance, although a closer look made them seem unfamiliar.[55] Cuarón informed the art department that the film was the "anti-Blade Runner",[56] rejecting technologically advanced proposals and downplaying the science fiction elements of the 2027 setting. The director focused on images reflecting the contemporary period.[57][58]

Single-shot sequences

Children of Men used several lengthy single-shot sequences in which extremely complex actions take place. The longest of these are a shot in which Kee gives birth (199 seconds; 3:19); an ambush on a country road (247 seconds; 4:07); and a scene in which Theo is captured by the Fishes, escapes, and runs down a street and through a building in the middle of a raging battle (378 seconds; 6:18).[59] These sequences were extremely difficult to film, although the effect of continuity is sometimes an illusion, aided by CGI effects.[60]

Cuarón had experimented with long takes in Great Expectations, Y tu mamá también, and Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban. His style is influenced by the Swiss film Jonah Who Will Be 25 in the Year 2000, a favorite of Cuarón's. Cuarón said "I was studying cinema when I first saw [Jonah], and interested in the French New Wave. Jonah was so unflashy compared to those films. The camera keeps a certain distance and there are relatively few close-ups. It's elegant and flowing, constantly tracking, but very slowly and not calling attention to itself."[61]

The creation of the single-shot sequences was a challenging, time-consuming process that sparked concerns from the studio. It took fourteen days to prepare for the single shot in which Clive Owen's character searches a building under attack, and five hours for every time they wanted to reshoot it. In the middle of one shot, blood splattered onto the lens, and cinematographer Emmanuel Lubezki convinced the director to leave it in. According to Owen, "Right in the thick of it are me and the camera operator because we're doing this very complicated, very specific dance which, when we come to shoot, we have to make feel completely random."[62]

Cuarón's initial idea for maintaining continuity during the roadside ambush scene was dismissed by production experts as an "impossible shot to do". Fresh from the visual effects-laden Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban, Cuarón suggested using computer-generated imagery to film the scene. Lubezki refused to allow it, reminding the director that they had intended to make a film akin to a "raw documentary". Instead, a special camera rig invented by Gary Thieltges of Doggicam Systems was employed, allowing Cuarón to develop the scene as one extended shot.[14][63] A vehicle was modified to enable seats to tilt and lower actors out of the way of the camera, and the windshield was designed to tilt out of the way to allow camera movement in and out through the front windscreen. A crew of four, including the director of photography and camera operator, rode on the roof.[64]

However, the commonly reported statement that the action scenes are continuous shots[65] is not entirely true. Visual effects supervisor Frazer Churchill explains that the effects team had to "combine several takes to create impossibly long shots", where their job was to "create the illusion of a continuous camera move." Once the team was able to create a "seamless blend", they would move on to the next shot. These techniques were important for three continuous shots: the coffee shop explosion in the opening shot, the car ambush, and the battlefield scene. The coffee shop scene was composed of "two different takes shot over two consecutive days"; the car ambush was shot in "six sections and at four different locations over one week and required five seamless digital transitions"; and the battlefield scene "was captured in five separate takes over two locations". Churchill and the Double Negative team created over 160 of these types of effects for the film.[66] In an interview with Variety, Cuarón acknowledged this nature of the "single-shot" action sequences: "Maybe I'm spilling a big secret, but sometimes it's more than what it looks like. The important thing is how you blend everything and how you keep the perception of a fluid choreography through all of these different pieces."[9]

Tim Webber of VFX house Framestore CFC was responsible for the three-and-a-half-minute single take of Kee giving birth, helping to choreograph and create the CG effects of the childbirth.[49] Cuarón had originally intended to use an animatronic baby as Kee's child with the exception of the childbirth scene. In the end, two takes were shot, with the second take concealing Clare-Hope Ashitey's legs, replacing them with prosthetic legs. Cuarón was pleased with the results of the effect, and returned to previous shots of the baby in animatronic form, replacing them with Framestore's computer-generated baby.[60]

Sound

Cuarón uses sound and music to bring the fictional world of social unrest and infertility to life.[67] A creative yet restrained combination of rock, pop, electronic music, hip-hop and classical music replaces the typical film score.[67] The mundane sounds of traffic, barking dogs, and advertisements follow the character of Theo through London, East Sussex and Kent, producing what Los Angeles Times writer Kevin Crust calls an "urban audio rumble".[67] For Crust, the music comments indirectly on the barren world of Children of Men: Deep Purple's version of "Hush" blaring from Jasper's car radio becomes a "sly lullaby for a world without babies" while King Crimson's "The Court of the Crimson King" make a similar allusion with their lyrics, "three lullabies in an ancient tongue".[67]

Amongst a genre-spanning selection of electronic music, a remix of Aphex Twin's "Omgyjya Switch 7", which includes the 'Male Thijs Loud Scream' audio sample by Thanvannispen,[68] not present on the original (nor indeed on the official soundtrack) can be heard during the scene in Jasper's house, where Jasper's "Strawberry Cough" (a potent, strawberry-flavoured strain of marijuana) is being sampled. During a conversation between the two men, Radiohead's "Life in a Glasshouse" plays in the background.

A number of dubstep tracks, most notably Anti-War Dub by Digital Mystikz, as well as tracks by Kode9 & The Space Ape and Pressure are also featured.[69]

For the Bexhill scenes during the film's second half, the director makes use of silence and cacophonous sound effects such as the firing of automatic weapons and loudspeakers directing the movement of "fugees" (illegal immigrants).[67] Here, classical music by George Frideric Handel, Gustav Mahler, and Krzysztof Penderecki's "Threnody to the Victims of Hiroshima" complements the chaos of the refugee camp.[67] Throughout the film, John Tavener's Fragments of a Prayer is used as a spiritual motif to explain and interpret the story without the use of narrative.[67]

A few times during the film, a loud, ringing tone evocative of tinnitus is heard. This sound generally coincides with the death of a major character (Julian, Jasper) and is referred to by Julian herself, who describes the tones as the last time you'll ever hear that frequency. In this way, then, the loss of the tones is symbolic of the loss of the characters.[70]

Release

Children of Men had its world premiere at the 63rd Venice International Film Festival on 3 September 2006.[71] On 22 September 2006, the film debuted at number 1 in the United Kingdom with $2.4 million in 368 screens.[72] It debuted in a limited release of 16 theaters in the United States on 22 December 2006, expanding to more than 1,200 theaters on 5 January 2007.[73] As of 6 February 2008, Children of Men had grossed $69,612,678 worldwide, with $35,552,383 of the revenue generated in the United States.[74]

Critical reception

Children of Men received critical acclaim; on the review aggregator website Rotten Tomatoes, the film received a 92% approval rating based on 238 reviews from critics, with an average rating of 8/10. The site's critical consensus states: "Children of Men works on every level: as a violent chase thriller, a fantastical cautionary tale, and a sophisticated human drama about societies struggling to live."[75] On Metacritic, the film has a score of 84 out of 100, based on 38 reviews, indicating "universal acclaim".[76]

Dana Stevens of Slate called it "the herald of another blessed event: the arrival of a great director by the name of Alfonso Cuarón." Stevens hailed the film's extended car chase and battle scenes as "two of the most virtuoso single-shot chase sequences I've ever seen."[33] Manohla Dargis of The New York Times called the film a "superbly directed political thriller", raining accolades on the long chase scenes.[42] "Easily one of the best films of the year" said Ethan Alter of Film Journal International, with scenes that "dazzle you with their technical complexity and visual virtuosity."[26] Jonathan Romney of The Independent praised the accuracy of Cuarón's portrait of the United Kingdom, but he criticized some of the film's futuristic scenes as "run-of-the-mill future fantasy."[44] Film Comment's critics' poll of the best films of 2006 ranked the film number 19, while the 2006 readers' poll ranked it number two.[77] On their list of the best movies of 2006, The A.V. Club, the San Francisco Chronicle, Slate, and The Washington Post placed the film at number one.[78] Entertainment Weekly ranked the film seventh on its end-of-the-decade top 10 list, saying, "Alfonso Cuarón's dystopian 2006 film reminded us that adrenaline-juicing action sequences can work best when the future looks just as grimy as today."[79]

Peter Travers of Rolling Stone ranked it number two on his list of best films of the decade, writing:

I thought director Alfonso Cuarón's film of P.D. James' futuristic political-fable novel was good when it opened in 2006. After repeated viewings, I know Children of Men is indisputably great ... No movie this decade was more redolent of sorrowful beauty and exhilarating action. You don't just watch the car ambush scene (pure camera wizardry)—you live inside it. That's Cuarón's magic: He makes you believe."[80]

According to Metacritic's analysis of the most often and notably noted films on the best-of-the-decade lists, Children of Men is considered the 11th greatest film of the 2000s.

In the wake of the European migrant crisis of 2015 and the US presidential elections of 2016, both of which involved divisive debates about immigration and increasing border enforcement, several commentators reappraised the film's importance, with some calling it "prescient".[81][82][83][84][85]

Top 10 lists

The film appeared on many critics' top 10 lists as one of the best films of 2006:[78]

In 2012, director Marc Webb included the film on his list of Top 10 Greatest Films when asked by Sight & Sound for his votes for the BFI The Top 50 Greatest Films of All Time.[86] In 2015, the film was named number one on an all-time Top 10 Movies list by the blog Pop Culture Philosopher.[87] In 2017 Rolling Stone magazine ranked Children of Men as the best Sci-fi film of the 21st century.

Accolades

P. D. James was reported to be pleased with the film,[88] and the screenwriters of Children of Men were awarded the 19th annual USC Scripter Award for the screen adaptation of the novel. Howard A. Rodman, chair of the USC School of Cinematic Arts Writing Division, described the book-to-screen adaptation as "writing and screen writing of the highest order", although Gerschatt, writing in Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, noted that the screenplay bore very little resemblance to the novel: the gender of the baby was changed, as was the character who was pregnant (Julian, in the novel); Theo, who dies in the film, did not die in the novel.[89]

Award Category Recipient Result
Academy Awards Best Cinematography Emmanuel Lubezki Nominated
Best Adapted Screenplay Alfonso Cuarón, Timothy J. Sexton, David Arata, Mark Fergus & Hawk Ostby Nominated
Best Editing Alfonso Cuarón and Álex Rodríguez Nominated
British Academy of Film and Television Arts Best Cinematography Emmanuel Lubezki Won
Best Production Design Jim Clay, Geoffrey Kirkland, and Jennifer Williams Won
Best Special Visual Effects Frazer Churchill, Tim Webber, Mike Eames, and Paul Corbould Nominated
American Society of Cinematographers Best Cinematography Emmanuel Lubezki Won
Australian Cinematographers Society International Award for Cinematography Emmanuel Lubezki Won
Hugo Awards Best Dramatic Presentation Nominated
Saturn Awards Best Science Fiction Film Won
Best Director Alfonso Cuarón Nominated
Best Actor Clive Owen Nominated

Home media

The HD-DVD and DVD were released in Europe on 15 January 2007[90] and in the United States on 27 March 2007. Extras include a half-hour documentary by director Alfonso Cuarón, entitled The Possibility of Hope (2007), which explores the intersection between the film's themes and reality with a critical analysis by eminent scholars: the Slovenian sociologist and philosopher Slavoj Žižek, anti-globalization activist Naomi Klein, environmentalist futurist James Lovelock, sociologist Saskia Sassen, human geographer Fabrizio Eva, cultural theorist Tzvetan Todorov, and philosopher and economist John N. Gray. "Under Attack" features a demonstration of the innovative techniques required for the car chase and battle scenes; in "Theo & Julian", Clive Owen and Julianne Moore discuss their characters; "Futuristic Design" opens the door on the production design and look of the film; "Visual Effects" shows how the digital baby was created. Deleted scenes are included.[91] The film was released on Blu-ray Disc in the United States on 26 May 2009.[92]

References

  1. "CHILDREN OF MEN (15)". Universal Studios. British Board of Film Classification. 15 September 2006. Retrieved 30 May 2014.
  2. "Children of Men (BFI)". British Film Institute. Retrieved 9 April 2014.
  3. 1 2 "Children of Men (2006)". Box Office Mojo. Retrieved 6 April 2014.
  4. Vineberg, Steve (6 February 2007). "Rumors of a birth". The Christian Century. Vol. 124 no. 3.
  5. Meyer, Carla (3 January 2007). "Children of Men". Sacramento Bee.
  6. Williamson, Kevin (3 January 2007). "Man of action". Calgary Sun. Archived from the original on 27 September 2007. Retrieved 2 December 2011.
  7. Snyder, Gabriel (27 April 2005). "Owen having U's children". Variety. Retrieved 2 February 2007.
  8. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Voynar, Kim (25 December 2006). "Interview: Children of Men Director Alfonso Cuarón". Moviefone. Archived from the original on 17 April 2014. Retrieved 23 January 2007.
  9. 1 2 Debruge, Peter (19 February 2007). "Editors cut us in on tricky sequences". Variety.
  10. Snyder, Gabriel (15 June 2005). "Moore makes way to U's Children". Variety. Retrieved 2 February 2007. Moore's character is the first woman to become pregnant in nearly 20 years. Owen is enlisted to protect her after the death of the Earth's youngest person, age 18.
  11. Wagner, Annie (28 December 2006). "Politics, Bible Stories and Hope. An Interview with Alfonso Cuarón". The Stranger. Retrieved 26 February 2007.
  12. Hennerson, Evan (19 December 2006). "Brave new world. Clive Owen embarks on a mission to ensure humanity's survival". Los Angeles Daily News. Archived from the original on 30 September 2007. Retrieved 26 February 2007.
  13. 1 2 3 "Interview: Alfonso Cuaron". Moviehole. Archived from the original on 12 October 2007. Retrieved 10 February 2007.
  14. 1 2 Phillips, Michael (27 December 2006). "Children of Men director thrives on collaboration". Chicago Tribune.
  15. "Cuaron Mulls SF Film". Sci Fi Wire. 27 May 2004. Archived from the original on 12 October 2007. Retrieved 4 February 2007.
  16. 1 2 Puig, Claudia (21 December 2006). "Children of Men sends stark message". USA Today. Retrieved 29 January 2007.
  17. 1 2 3 4 5 Wells, Jeffrey (1 November 2006). "Interview with Alfonso Cuarón". Hollywood Elsewhere. Archived from the original on 27 September 2007. Retrieved 23 January 2007.
  18. 1 2 "You ask the questions: P. D. James". The Independent. 14 March 2001. Retrieved 16 January 2011.
  19. Seshadri, B. (1 February 1995). "Male infertility and world population". Contemporary Review. Archived from the original on 14 May 2007. Retrieved 23 January 2007.
  20. Bowman, James (2007). "Our Childless Dystopia". The New Atlantis (15): 107–110. Archived from the original on 26 May 2007. Retrieved 25 May 2007.
  21. Ross, Bob (5 January 2007). "Hope is as scarce as Children in Dystopian Sci-Fi Thriller". Tampa Tribune.
  22. Rahner, Mark (22 December 2006). "Alfonso Cuaron, director of "Y tu mama tambien" searches for hope in "Children of Men"". Seattle Times. Retrieved 5 June 2009.
  23. 1 2 Vo, Alex. "Interview with "Children of Men" Director Alfonso Cuarón". Rotten Tomatoes. Archived from the original on 26 February 2007. Retrieved 23 January 2007.
  24. 1 2 3 4 Guerrasio, Jason (22 December 2006). "A New Humanity". Filmmaker Magazine. Retrieved 23 January 2007.
  25. 1 2 3 Blake, Richard A. (5 February 2007). "What If...?". America.
  26. 1 2 3 4 Alter, Ethan. "Reviews: Children of Men". Film Journal International. Archived from the original on 8 October 2007. Retrieved 28 January 2007.
  27. Butler, Robert W. (5 January 2007). "Sci-fi movie paints grim future". Kansas City Star.
  28. von Busack, Richard (10 January 2007). "Making the Future: Richard von Busack talks to Alfonso Cuarón about filming Children of Men". Metroactive. Retrieved 23 January 2007.
  29. Dargis, Manohla (7 January 2007). "Beauty and Beasts of England, in a World on Its Last Legs". The New York Times. Awards Season. Retrieved 2008-05-01.
  30. Anthony Sacramone (8 November 2008). "Children of Men". First Things. Retrieved 20 December 2010.
  31. Simon, Jeff (4 January 2007). "Life Force: Who carries the torch of hope when the world is without children?". The Buffalo News.
  32. "Children of Men". People. Vol. 67 no. 1. 8 January 2007.
  33. 1 2 Stevens, Dana (21 December 2006). "The Movie of the Millennium". Slate. Retrieved 15 February 2007.
  34. Richstatter, Katje (Mar–Apr 2007). "Two Dystopian Movies...and their Visions of Hope". Tikkun. Vol. 22 no. 2.
  35. Broxton, Jonathan (17 January 2007). "Children of Men". Movie Music UK. Archived from the original on 28 February 2007. Retrieved 5 February 2007.
  36. Crust, Kevin (17 January 2007). "Unconventional soundscape in Children of Men". Chicago Tribune. Retrieved 26 January 2007.
  37. LaCara, Len (22 April 2007). "Cruelest of months leaves more families grieving". Coshocton Tribune.
  38. Lowman, Rob (27 March 2007). "Cuaron vs. the world". Los Angeles Daily News.
  39. Kozma, Andrew; Eldred, Laura (16 January 2007). "Children of Men: Review". RevolutionSF. Retrieved 8 February 2007.
  40. Rowin, Michael Joshua (Spring 2007). "Children of Men". Cineaste. Vol. 32 no. 2. pp. 60–61. Archived from the original on 28 September 2007.
  41. Bennett, Ray (4 September 2006). "Children of Men". The Hollywood Reporter. Archived from the original on 20 January 2007. Retrieved 29 January 2007.
  42. 1 2 Dargis, Manohla (25 December 2006). "Apocalypse Now, but in the Wasteland a Child Is Given". The New York Times. Retrieved 30 January 2007.
  43. Smith, Chris (1 January 2007). "Children of Men a dark film, and one of 2006's best". Bangor Daily News. Retrieved 29 January 2007.
  44. 1 2 3 Romney, Jonathan (January–February 2007). "Green and Pleasant Land". Film Comment. pp. 32–35.
  45. Herrmann, Zachary (14 December 2006). "Championing the Children". The Diamondback. Archived from the original on 28 September 2007. Retrieved 4 February 2007.
  46. Fleming, Michael (5 October 2001). "Helmer Raises Children". Daily Variety.
  47. Douglas, Edward (8 December 2006). "Exclusive: Filmmaker Alfonso Cuarón". ComingSoon.net. Retrieved 8 February 2007.
  48. 1 2 3 "Children of Men feature". Time Out. 21 September 2006. Archived from the original on 16 February 2007. Retrieved 8 February 2007.
  49. 1 2 3 4 Barraclough, Leo (18 September 2006). "Nightmare on the Thames". Variety.
  50. Pols, Mary F. (25 December 2006). "A haunting view of the end". Contra Costa Times.
  51. Faraci, Devin (4 January 2007). "Exclusive Interview: Alfonso Cuaron (Children of Men)". Chud.com. Retrieved 8 February 2007.
  52. French, Philip (24 September 2006). "Children of Men". The Observer. Retrieved 7 June 2009.
  53. Kent Film Office. "Kent Film Office Children of Men Film Focus".
  54. Covert, Colin (5 January 2007). "Movie review: Future shock in Children of Men". Star Tribune.
  55. Roberts, Sheila (19 December 2006). "Alfonso Cuarón Interview, Director of Children of Men". MoviesOnline.ca. Archived from the original on 16 July 2011. Retrieved 8 February 2007.
  56. "The Connecting of Heartbeats". Nashville Scene. 1 January 2007. Archived from the original on 27 September 2007. Retrieved 15 February 2007.
  57. Briggs, Caroline (20 September 2006). "Movie imagines world gone wrong". BBC. Retrieved 8 February 2007.
  58. Horn, John (19 December 2006). "There's no place like hell for the holidays". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 8 February 2007.
  59. Miller, Neil (29 April 2012). "Scenes We Love: Explore Alfonso Cuaron's Addiction to Single Takes in 'Children of Men'". Film School Rejects. Archived from the original on 15 April 2014. Retrieved 14 April 2014.
  60. 1 2 "Framestore CFC Delivers Children of Men". VFXWorld Magazine. 16 October 2006. Retrieved 8 February 2007.
  61. Johnston, Sheila (30 September 2006). "Film-makers on film: Alfonso Cuarón". The Daily Telegraph. Retrieved 8 February 2007.
  62. Sutherland, Claire (19 October 2006). "Clive's happy with career". Herald Sun. Archived from the original on 7 September 2012. Retrieved 8 February 2007.
  63. "Two Axis Dolly". Doggicam Systems. Retrieved 24 January 2007.
  64. mseymour7 (4 January 2007). "Children of Men – Hard Core Seamless vfx". fxguide. Archived from the original on 11 October 2007. Retrieved 6 November 2007.
  65. Murray, Steve (29 December 2006). "Anatomy of a Scene". The Atlanta Journal-Constitution. Archived from the original on 22 January 2007. Retrieved 24 January 2007.
  66. Bielik, Alain (27 December 2006). "Children of Men: Invisible VFX for a Future in Decay". VFXWorld Magazine. Retrieved 24 January 2007.
  67. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Crust, Kevin (7 January 2007). "Critic's Notebook; Sounds to match to the Children of Men vision". Los Angeles Times. p. E–24.
  68. "9432 thanvannispen male-thijs-loud-scream by Linus Carl Norlen". Soundcloud.com. Retrieved 21 December 2012.
  69. Reynolds, Simon. "Reasons to Be Cheerful (Just Three)". The Village Voice. Archived from the original on 22 June 2007. Retrieved 18 July 2007.
  70. ""Children of Men": The Repetition of the Ringing". Filmint.nu. Retrieved 13 December 2009.
  71. "Programme for pass holders and the public" (PDF). Venice International Film Festival. Archived from the original (PDF) on 7 March 2007. Retrieved 8 February 2007.
  72. Bresnan, Conor (25 September 2006). "Around the World Roundup: "Perfume" Wafts Past "Pirates"". Box Office Mojo. Retrieved 8 February 2007.
  73. Mohr, Ian (4 January 2007). "Men takes a bigger bow". Variety. Retrieved 8 February 2007.
  74. "Children of Men (2006)". Box Office Mojo. Retrieved 28 February 2007.
  75. "Children of Men (2006)". Rotten Tomatoes. Retrieved 14 October 2012.
  76. "Children of Men (2006): Reviews". Metacritic. Retrieved 8 February 2007.
  77. "Readers' Poll". Film Comment. March–April 2007.
  78. 1 2 "Metacritic: 2006 Film Critic Top Ten Lists". Metacritic. Archived from the original on 13 December 2007. Retrieved 8 January 2008.
  79. Geier, Thom; Jensen, Jeff; Jordan, Tina; Lyons, Margaret; Markovitz, Adam; Nashawaty, Chris; Pastorek, Whitney; Rice, Lynette; Rottenberg, Josh; Schwartz, Missy; Slezak, Michael; Snierson, Dan; Stack, Tim; Stroup, Kate; Tucker, Ken; Vary, Adam B.; Vozick-Levinson, Simon; Ward, Kate (12 November 2009). "Ten Best Movies Of The Decade!". Entertainment Weekly. Retrieved 4 February 2010.
  80. Travers, Peter. "Children of Men (2006)". Rolling Stone. Archived from the original on 25 June 2010. Retrieved 1 May 2010.
  81. Barber, Nicholas (15 Dec 2016). "Why Children of Men has never been as shocking as it is now". BBC Culture. Retrieved 20 Jan 2018. Today, it’s hard to watch the television news headlines in Children of Men without gasping at their prescience:
  82. Rodriguez-Cuervo, Ana Yamel (30 Nov 2015). "Are We Living in the Dawning of Alfonso Cuarón's CHILDREN OF MEN?". TribecaFilm. Retrieved 20 Jan 2018.
  83. Newton, Mark (22 Dec 2016). "'Children Of Men' 10 Year Anniversary: Why Cuarón's Dystopian Masterpiece Is Even More Relevant Today". Movie Pilot. Retrieved 20 Jan 2018.
  84. Riesman, Abraham (29 Nov 2017). "Why 'Children of Men' is the most relevant film of 2017". SBS. Retrieved 20 Jan 2018. [...] the 55-year-old director gets a little irritated when I laud the film’s imaginative prescience.
  85. Novak, Matt (9 Apr 2015). "The Syrian Refugee Crisis Is Our Children of Men Moment". Paleofuture. Retrieved 20 Jan 2018.
  86. "Marc Webb". Sight & Sound Greatest Films Poll. British Film Institute. 2012. Retrieved 3 October 2012.
  87. Sunami, Chris (7 May 2015). "Top 10 Movies: #1 – Children of Men". The Pop Culture Philosopher. Retrieved 24 May 2016.
  88. "P.D. James Pleased With Film Version of Children of Men". IWJBlog. 9 January 2007. Retrieved 7 June 2009.
  89. Kit, Boris (13 January 2007). "Scripter goes to Children of Men". The Hollywood Reporter. Archived from the original on 15 September 2007. Retrieved 2 December 2011.
  90. Children of Men (DVD ed.). Europe and United States. 2007. Archived from the original on 10 March 2007. Retrieved 12 March 2007.
  91. Howell, Peter (29 March 2007). "A stark prophecy". Toronto Star.
  92. Children of Men (Blu-ray ed.). United States. 26 May 2009. Retrieved 11 August 2009.

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.