Centaur (small Solar System body)

Centaurs are small Solar System bodies with either a perihelion or a semi-major axis between those of the outer planets. They generally have unstable orbits because they cross or have crossed the orbits of one or more of the giant planets; almost all their orbits have dynamic lifetimes of only a few million years,[1] but there is one Centaur, 514107 Kaʻepaokaʻawela, which may be in a stable (though retrograde) orbit.[2] Centaurs typically behave with characteristics of both asteroids and comets. They are named after the mythological centaurs that were a mixture of horse and human. Observational bias toward large objects makes determination of the total Centaur population difficult. Estimates for the number of Centaurs in the Solar System more than 1 km in diameter range from as low as 44,000[1] to more than 10,000,000[3][4]

Positions of known outer Solar System objects.
The Centaurs lie generally inwards of the Kuiper belt and outside the Jupiter trojans.
  Sun
  Jupiter trojans (6,178)
  Scattered disc (>300)   Neptune trojans (9)		   Giant planets: J · S · U · N
  Centaurs (44,000)
  Kuiper belt (>100,000)
(scale in AU; epoch as of January 2015; # of objects in parenthesis)
Types of distant minor planets

The first Centaur to be discovered, under the definition of the Jet Propulsion Laboratory and the one used here, was 944 Hidalgo in 1920. However, they were not recognized as a distinct population until the discovery of 2060 Chiron in 1977. The largest confirmed Centaur is 10199 Chariklo, which at 260 kilometers in diameter is as big as a mid-sized main-belt asteroid, and is known to have a system of rings. It was discovered in 1997. However, the lost Centaur 1995 SN55 may be somewhat larger. The transneptunian object 2018 VG18, which is a Centaur under the broader definition, may be quite a bit larger.

No Centaur has been photographed up close, although there is evidence that Saturn's moon Phoebe, imaged by the Cassini probe in 2004, may be a captured Centaur that originated in the Kuiper belt.[5] In addition, the Hubble Space Telescope has gleaned some information about the surface features of 8405 Asbolus.

1 Ceres may have originated in the region of the outer planets,[6] and if so might be considered an ex-Centaur, but the Centaurs seen today all originated elsewhere.

Of the objects known to occupy Centaur-like orbits, approximately 30 have been found to display comet-like dust comas, with three, 2060 Chiron, 60558 Echeclus, and 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 1, having detectable levels of volatile production in orbits entirely beyond Jupiter[7]. Chiron and Echeclus are therefore classified as both asteroids and comets, while Schwassmann-Wachmann 1 has always held a comet designation. Other Centaurs, such as 52872 Okyrhoe, are suspected of having shown comas. Any Centaur that is perturbed close enough to the Sun is expected to become a comet.

Classification

The generic definition of a Centaur is a small body that orbits the Sun between Jupiter and Neptune and crosses the orbits of one or more of the giant planets. Due to the inherent long-term instability of orbits in this region, even Centaurs such as 2000 GM137 and 2001 XZ255, which do not currently cross the orbit of any planet, are in gradually changing orbits that will be perturbed until they start to cross the orbit of one or more of the giant planets.[1] Some astronomers count only bodies with semimajor axes in the region of the outer planets to be Centaurs; others accept any body with a perihelion in the region, as their orbits are similarly unstable.

Discrepant criteria

However, different institutions have different criteria for classifying borderline objects, based on particular values of their orbital elements:

  • The Minor Planet Center (MPC) defines Centaurs as having a perihelion beyond the orbit of Jupiter (5.2 AU < q) and a semi-major axis less than that of Neptune (a < 30.1 AU).[8] Though nowadays the MPC often lists Centaurs and scattered disc objects together as a single group.
  • The Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) similarly defines Centaurs as having a semi-major axis, a, between those of Jupiter and Neptune (5.5 AU ≤ a ≤ 30.1 AU).[9]
  • In contrast, the Deep Ecliptic Survey (DES) defines Centaurs using a dynamical classification scheme. These classifications are based on the simulated change in behavior of the present orbit when extended over 10 million years. The DES defines Centaurs as non-resonant objects whose instantaneous (osculating) perihelia are less than the osculating semi-major axis of Neptune at any time during the simulation. This definition is intended to be synonymous with planet-crossing orbits and to suggest comparatively short lifetimes in the current orbit.[10]
  • The collection The Solar System Beyond Neptune (2008) defines objects with a semi-major axis between those of Jupiter and Neptune and a Jupiter-relative Tisserand's parameter above 3.05 as Centaurs, classifying the objects with a Jupiter-relative Tisserand's parameter below this and, to exclude Kuiper belt objects, an arbitrary perihelion cut-off half-way to Saturn (q ≤ 7.35 AU) as Jupiter-family comets, and classifying those objects on unstable orbits with a semi-major axis larger than Neptune's as members of the scattered disc.[11]
  • Other astronomers prefer to define Centaurs as objects that are non-resonant with a perihelion inside the orbit of Neptune that can be shown to likely cross the Hill sphere of a gas giant within the next 10 million years,[12] so that Centaurs can be thought of as objects scattered inwards and that interact more strongly and scatter more quickly than typical scattered-disc objects.
  • The JPL Small-Body Database lists 452 Centaurs.[13] There are an additional 116 trans-Neptunian objects (objects with a semi-major axis further than Neptune's, i.e. 30.1 AU ≤ a) with a perihelion closer than the orbit of Uranus (q ≤ 19.2 AU).[14]

Objects caught between the lines

The Gladman & Marsden (2008)[11] criteria would make some objects Jupiter-family comets: Both Echeclus (q = 5.8 AU, TJ = 3.03) and Okyrhoe (q = 5.8 AU; TJ = 2.95) have traditionally been classified as Centaurs. Traditionally considered an asteroid, but classified as a Centaur by JPL, Hidalgo (q = 1.95 AU; TJ = 2.07) would also change category to a Jupiter-family comet. Schwassmann-Wachmann 1 (q = 5.72 AU; TJ = 2.99) has been categorized as both a Centaur and a Jupiter-family comet depending on the definition used.

Other objects caught between these differences in classification methods include 944 Hidalgo which was discovered in 1920 and is listed as a Centaur in the JPL Small-Body Database. (44594) 1999 OX3, which has a semi-major axis of 32 AU but crosses the orbits of both Uranus and Neptune is listed as an outer Centaur by the Deep Ecliptic Survey (DES). Among the inner Centaurs, (434620) 2005 VD, with a perihelion distance very near Jupiter, is listed as a Centaur by both JPL and DES.

A recent orbital simulation[3] of the evolution of Kuiper Belt Objects through the Centaur region has identified a short-lived "orbital gateway" between 5.4 and 7.8 AU through which 21% of all Centaurs pass, including 72% of the Centaurs that become Jupiter-family comets. Four objects are known to occupy this region, including 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann, P/2010 TO20 LINEAR-Grauer, P/2008 CL94 Lemmon, and 2016 LN8, but the simulations indicate that there may of order 1000 more objects >1 km in radius that have yet to be detected. Objects in this gateway region can display significant activity[15][16] and are in an important evolutionary transition state that further blurs the distinction between the Centaur and Jupiter-family comet populations.

No official word, yet

The Committee on Small Body Nomenclature of the International Astronomical Union has not formally weighed in on any side of the debate. Instead, it has adopted the following naming convention for such objects: Befitting their Centaur-like transitional orbits between TNOs and comets, "objects on unstable, non-resonant, giant-planet-crossing orbits with semimajor axes greater than Neptune's" are to be named for other hybrid and shape-shifting mythical creatures. Thus far, only the binary objects Ceto and Phorcys and Typhon and Echidna have been named according to the new policy.[17]

Possible dwarf planet raise further issues

Centaurs with measured diameters listed as possible dwarf planets according to Mike Brown's website include 10199 Chariklo, (523727) 2014 NW65, 2060 Chiron, and 54598 Bienor.[18]

Orbits

Distribution
Orbits of known Centaurs[note 1]

The diagram illustrates the orbits of known Centaurs in relation to the orbits of the planets. For selected objects, the eccentricity of the orbits is represented by red segments (extending from perihelion to aphelion).

The orbits of Centaurs show a wide range of eccentricity, from highly eccentric (Pholus, Asbolus, Amycus, Nessus) to more circular (Chariklo and the Saturn-crossers Thereus and Okyrhoe).

To illustrate the range of the orbits' parameters, the diagram shows a few objects with very unusual orbits, plotted in yellow :

  • 1999 XS35 (Apollo asteroid) follows an extremely eccentric orbit (e = 0.947), leading it from inside Earth's orbit (0.94 AU) to well beyond Neptune (> 34 AU)
  • 2007 TB434 follows a quasi-circular orbit (e < 0.026)
  • 2001 XZ255 has the lowest inclination (i < 3°).
  • 2004 YH32 is one of a small proportion of Centaurs with an extreme prograde inclination (i > 60°). It follows such a highly inclined orbit (79°) that, while it crosses from the distance of the asteroid belt from the Sun to past the distance of Saturn, if its orbit is projected onto the plane of Jupiter's orbit, it does not even go out as far as Jupiter.

A dozen known Centaurs follow retrograde orbits. Their inclinations range from modest (e.g., 160° for Dioretsa) to extreme (i < 120°; e.g. 105° for (342842) 2008 YB3[19]).

Changing orbits
The semi-major axis of Asbolus during the next 5500 years, using two slightly different estimates of present-day orbital elements. After the Jupiter encounter of year 4713 the two calculations diverge.[20]

Because the Centaurs are not protected by orbital resonances, their orbits are unstable within a timescale of 106–107 years.[21] For example, 55576 Amycus is in an unstable orbit near the 3:4 resonance of Uranus.[1] Dynamical studies of their orbits indicate that being a Centaur is probably an intermediate orbital state of objects transitioning from the Kuiper belt to the Jupiter family of short-period comets.

Objects may be perturbed from the Kuiper belt, whereupon they become Neptune-crossing and interact gravitationally with that planet (see theories of origin). They then become classed as Centaurs, but their orbits are chaotic, evolving relatively rapidly as the Centaur makes repeated close approaches to one or more of the outer planets. Some Centaurs will evolve into Jupiter-crossing orbits whereupon their perihelia may become reduced into the inner Solar System and they may be reclassified as active comets in the Jupiter family if they display cometary activity. Centaurs will thus ultimately collide with the Sun or a planet or else they may be ejected into interstellar space after a close approach to one of the planets, particularly Jupiter.

Physical characteristics

The relatively small size of Centaurs precludes remote observation of surfaces, but colour indices and spectra can provide clues about surface composition and insight into the origin of the bodies.[21]

Colours
Colour distribution of Centaurs

The colours of Centaurs are very diverse, which challenges any simple model of surface composition.[22] In the side-diagram, the colour indices are measures of apparent magnitude of an object through blue (B), visible (V) (i.e. green-yellow) and red (R) filters. The diagram illustrates these differences (in exaggerated colours) for all Centaurs with known colour indices. For reference, two moons: Triton and Phoebe, and planet Mars are plotted (yellow labels, size not to scale).

Centaurs appear to be grouped into two classes:

  • very red – for example 5145 Pholus
  • blue (or blue-grey, according to some authors) – for example 2060 Chiron

There are numerous theories to explain this colour difference, but they can be divided broadly into two categories:

  • The colour difference results from a difference in the origin and/or composition of the Centaur (see origin below)
  • The colour difference reflects a different level of space-weathering from radiation and/or cometary activity.

As examples of the second category, the reddish colour of Pholus has been explained as a possible mantle of irradiated red organics, whereas Chiron has instead had its ice exposed due to its periodic cometary activity, giving it a blue/grey index. The correlation with activity and color is not certain, however, as the active Centaurs span the range of colors from blue (Chiron) to red (166P/NEAT).[23] Alternatively, Pholus may have been only recently expelled from the Kuiper belt, so that surface transformation processes have not yet taken place.

Delsanti et al. suggest multiple competing processes: reddening by the radiation, and blushing by collisions.[24][25]

Spectra

The interpretation of spectra is often ambiguous, related to particle sizes and other factors, but the spectra offer an insight into surface composition. As with the colours, the observed spectra can fit a number of models of the surface.

Water ice signatures have been confirmed on a number of Centaurs[21] (including 2060 Chiron, 10199 Chariklo and 5145 Pholus). In addition to the water ice signature, a number of other models have been put forward:

  • Chariklo's surface has been suggested to be a mixture of tholins (like those detected on Titan and Triton) with amorphous carbon.
  • Pholus has been suggested to be covered by a mixture of Titan-like tholins, carbon black, olivine[26] and methanol ice.
  • The surface of 52872 Okyrhoe has been suggested to be a mixture of kerogens, olivines and small percentage of water ice.
  • 8405 Asbolus has been suggested to be a mixture of 15% Triton-like tholins, 8% Titan-like tholin, 37% amorphous carbon and 40% ice tholin.

Chiron appears to be the most complex. The spectra observed vary depending on the period of the observation. Water ice signature was detected during a period of low activity and disappeared during high activity.[27][28][29]

Similarities to comets
Comet 38P exhibits Centaur-like behavior by making close approaches to Jupiter, Saturn, and Uranus between 1982 and 2067.[30]

Observations of Chiron in 1988 and 1989 near its perihelion found it to display a coma (a cloud of gas and dust evaporating from its surface). It is thus now officially classified as both a comet and an asteroid, although it is far larger than a typical comet and there is some lingering controversy. Other Centaurs are being monitored for comet-like activity: so far two, 60558 Echeclus, and 166P/NEAT have shown such behavior. 166P/NEAT was discovered while it exhibited a coma, and so is classified as a comet, though its orbit is that of a Centaur. 60558 Echeclus was discovered without a coma but recently became active,[31] and so it too is now classified as both a comet and an asteroid. Overall, there are ~30 Centaurs for which activity has been detected, with the active population biased toward objects with smaller perihelion distances. [32]

Carbon monoxide has been detected in 60558 Echeclus[7] and Chiron [33] in very small amounts, and the derived CO production rate was calculated to be sufficient to account for the observed coma. The calculated CO production rate from both 60558 Echeclus and Chiron is substantially lower than what is typically observed for 29P/Schwassmann–Wachmann[15], another distantly active comet often classified as a Centaur.

There is no clear orbital distinction between Centaurs and comets. Both 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann and 39P/Oterma have been referred to as Centaurs since they have typical Centaur orbits. The comet 39P/Oterma is currently inactive and was seen to be active only before it was perturbed into a Centaur orbit by Jupiter in 1963.[34] The faint comet 38P/Stephan–Oterma would probably not show a coma if it had a perihelion distance beyond Jupiter's orbit at 5 AU. By the year 2200, comet 78P/Gehrels will probably migrate outwards into a Centaur-like orbit.

Rotational periods

A periodogram analysis of the light-curves of these Chiron and Chariklo gives respectively the following rotational periods: 5.5±0.4~h and 7.0± 0.6~h.[35][35]

Size, density, reflectivity

A catalogue on the physical characteristics of Centaurs can be found at http://www.johnstonsarchive.net/astro/tnodiam.html. Centaurs can reach diameters up to hundreds of kilometers. The largest Centaurs have diameters in excess of 100 km, and primarily reside beyond about 13.11 AU. [36]

Hypotheses of origin

The study of Centaurs’ origins is rich in recent developments, but any conclusions are still hampered by limited physical data. Different models have been put forward for possible origin of Centaurs.

Simulations indicate that the orbit of some Kuiper belt objects can be perturbed, resulting in the object's expulsion so that it becomes a Centaur. Scattered disc objects would be dynamically the best candidates (For instance, the Centaurs could be part of an "inner" scattered disc of objects perturbed inwards from the Kuiper belt.[37]) for such expulsions, but their colours do not fit the bicoloured nature of the Centaurs. Plutinos are a class of Kuiper belt object that display a similar bicoloured nature, and there are suggestions that not all plutinos' orbits are as stable as initially thought, due to perturbation by Pluto.[38] Further developments are expected with more physical data on Kuiper belt objects.

Notable Centaurs
NameYearDiscovererHalf-life[1]
(forward)		Class
55576 Amycus2002NEAT at Palomar11.1 MaUK
54598 Bienor2000Marc W. Buie et al.?U
10370 Hylonome1995Mauna Kea Observatory6.3 MaUN
10199 Chariklo1997Spacewatch10.3 MaU
8405 Asbolus1995Spacewatch (James V. Scotti)0.86 MaSN
7066 Nessus1993Spacewatch (David L. Rabinowitz)4.9 MaSK
5145 Pholus1992Spacewatch (David L. Rabinowitz)1.28 MaSN
2060 Chiron1977Charles T. Kowal1.03 MaSU

^ the class is defined by the perihelion and aphelion distance of the object: S indicates a perihelion/aphelion near Saturn, U near Uranus, N near Neptune, and K in the Kuiper belt.

See also

Notes
  1. For the purpose of this diagram, an object is classified as a centaur if its semi-major axis lies between Jupiter and Neptune

References
  1. Horner, J.; Evans, N.W.; Bailey, M. E. (2004). "Simulations of the Population of Centaurs I: The Bulk Statisticsהיוש". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 354 (3): 798–810. arXiv:astro-ph/0407400. Bibcode:2004MNRAS.354..798H. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08240.x.
  2. Fathi Namouni and Maria Helena Moreira Morais (May 2, 2018). "An interstellar origin for Jupiter's retrograde co-orbital asteroid". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 477 (1): L117–L121. arXiv:1805.09013. Bibcode:2018MNRAS.477L.117N. doi:10.1093/mnrasl/sly057. For criticism of this idea see Billings, Lee (21 May 2018). "Astronomers Spot Potential "Interstellar" Asteroid Orbiting Backward around the Sun". Scientific American. Retrieved 1 June 2018.
  3. Sarid, G.; Volk, K.; Steckloff, J.; Harris, W.; Womack, M.; Woodney, L. (2019). "29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 1, A Centaur in the Gateway to the Jupiter-Family Comets". The Astrophysical Journal Letters. 883 (1): 7. arXiv:1908.04185. Bibcode:2019ApJ...883L..25S. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab3fb3.
  4. Sheppard, S.; Jewitt, D.; Trujillo, C.; Brown, M.; Ashley, M. (2000). "A Wide-Field CCD Survey for Centaurs and Kuiper Belt Objects". The Astronomical Journal. 120 (5): 2687–2694. arXiv:astro-ph/0008445. Bibcode:2000AJ....120.2687S. doi:10.1086/316805.
  5. Jewitt, David; Haghighipour, Nader (2007). "Irregular Satellites of the Planets: Products of Capture in the Early Solar System" (PDF). Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics. 45 (1): 261–95. arXiv:astro-ph/0703059. Bibcode:2007ARA&A..45..261J. doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.44.051905.092459. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2009-09-19.
  7. Wierzchos, K.; Womack, M.; Sarid, G. (2017). "Carbon Monoxide in the Distantly Active Centaur (60558) 174P/Echeclus at 6 au". The Astronomical Journal. 153 (5): 8. arXiv:1703.07660. Bibcode:2017AJ....153..230W. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aa689c.
  8. "Unusual Minor Planets". Minor Planet Center. Retrieved 25 October 2010.
  9. "Orbit Classification (Centaur)". JPL Solar System Dynamics. Retrieved 13 October 2008.
  10. Elliot, J.L.; Kern, S. D.; Clancy, K. B.; Gulbis, A. A. S.; Millis, R. L.; Buie, M. W.; Wasserman, L. H.; Chiang, E. I.; Jordan, A. B.; Trilling, D. E.; Meech, K. J. (2005). "The Deep Ecliptic Survey: A Search for Kuiper Belt Objects and Centaurs. II. Dynamical Classification, the Kuiper Belt Plane, and the Core Population". The Astronomical Journal. 129 (2): 1117–1162. Bibcode:2005AJ....129.1117E. doi:10.1086/427395.
  11. Gladman, B.; Marsden, B.; Van Laerhoven, C. (2008). Nomenclature in the Outer Solar System (PDF). The Solar System Beyond Neptune. Bibcode:2008ssbn.book...43G. ISBN 978-0-8165-2755-7.
  12. Chaing, Eugene; Lithwick, Y.; Murray-Clay, R.; Buie, M.; Grundy, W.; Holman, M. (2007). Reipurth, B.; Jewitt, D.; Keil, K. (eds.). "A Brief History of Transneptunian Space". Protostars and Planets V. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press: 895–911. arXiv:astro-ph/0601654. Bibcode:2007prpl.conf..895C.
  13. "JPL Small-Body Database Search Engine: List of centaurs". JPL Solar System Dynamics. Retrieved 11 October 2018.
  14. "JPL Small-Body Database Search Engine: List of TNOs with perihelia closer than Uranus's orbit". JPL Solar System Dynamics. Retrieved 11 October 2018.
  15. Womack, M.; Wierzchos, K.; Sarid, G. (2017). "CO in Distantly Active Comets". Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific. 129 (973): 031001. arXiv:1611.00051. Bibcode:2017PASP..129c1001W. doi:10.1088/1538-3873/129/973/031001.
  16. Lacerda, P. (2013). "Comet P/2010 TO20 LINEAR-Grauer as a Mini-29P/SW1". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 883 (2): 1818–1826. arXiv:1208.0598. Bibcode:2013MNRAS.428.1818L. doi:10.1093/mnras/sts164.
  17. Grundy, Will; Stansberry, J.A.; Noll, K; Stephens, D.C.; Trilling, D.E.; Kern, S.D.; Spencer, J.R.; Cruikshank, D.P.; Levison, H.F. (2007). "The orbit, mass, size, albedo, and density of (65489) Ceto/Phorcys: A tidally-evolved binary Centaur". Icarus. 191 (1): 286–297. arXiv:0704.1523. Bibcode:2007Icar..191..286G. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2007.04.004.
  18. Brown, Michael E. "How many dwarf planets are there in the outer solar system? (updates daily)". California Institute of Technology. Retrieved 18 November 2016.
  19. C. de la Fuente Marcos; R. de la Fuente Marcos (2014). "Large retrograde Centaurs: visitors from the Oort cloud?". Astrophysics and Space Science. 352 (2): 409–419. arXiv:1406.1450. Bibcode:2014Ap&SS.352..409D. doi:10.1007/s10509-014-1993-9.
  20. "Three clones of centaur 8405 Asbolus making passes within 450Gm". Archived from the original on 2015-09-13. Retrieved 2009-05-02. ("Solex 10". Archived from the original on 2008-12-20.)
  21. Jewitt, David C.; A. Delsanti (2006). "The Solar System Beyond The Planets". Solar System Update : Topical and Timely Reviews in Solar System Sciences. Springer-Praxis Ed. ISBN 978-3-540-26056-1. (Preprint version (pdf))
  22. Barucci, M. A.; Doressoundiram, A.; Cruikshank, D. P. (2003). "Physical Characteristics of TNOs and Centaurs" (PDF). Laboratory for Space Studies and Astrophysics Instrumentation, Paris Observatory. Archived from the original (PDF) on 29 May 2008. Retrieved 20 March 2008.
  23. Bauer, J. M., Fernández, Y. R., & Meech, K. J. 2003. "An Optical Survey of the Active Centaur C/NEAT (2001 T4)", Publication of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific", 115, 981
  24. Peixinho, N.; Doressoundiram, A.; Delsanti, A.; Boehnhardt, H.; Barucci, M. A.; Belskaya, I. (2003). "Reopening the TNOs Color Controversy: Centaurs Bimodality and TNOs Unimodality". Astronomy and Astrophysics. 410 (3): L29–L32. arXiv:astro-ph/0309428. Bibcode:2003A&A...410L..29P. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20031420.
  25. Hainaut & Delsanti (2002) Color of Minor Bodies in the Outer Solar System Astronomy & Astrophysics, 389, 641 datasource
  26. A class of Magnesium Iron Silicates (Mg, Fe)2SiO4, common components of igneous rocks.
  27. Dotto, E; Barucci, M A; De Bergh, C (June 2003). "Colours and composition of the Centaurs". Earth, Moon, and Planets. 92 (1–4): 157–167. Bibcode:2003EM&P...92..157D. doi:10.1023/b:moon.0000031934.89097.88.
  28. Luu, Jane X.; Jewitt, David; Trujillo, C. A. (2000). "Water Ice on 2060 Chiron and its Implications for Centaurs and Kuiper Belt Objects". The Astrophysical Journal. 531 (2): L151–L154. arXiv:astro-ph/0002094. Bibcode:2000ApJ...531L.151L. doi:10.1086/312536. PMID 10688775.
  29. Fernandez, Y. R.; Jewitt, D. C.; Sheppard, S. S. (2002). "Thermal Properties of Centaurs Asbolus and Chiron". The Astronomical Journal. 123 (2): 1050–1055. arXiv:astro-ph/0111395. Bibcode:2002AJ....123.1050F. doi:10.1086/338436.
  30. "JPL Close-Approach Data: 38P/Stephan-Oterma". NASA. 1981-04-04. last obs. Retrieved 2009-05-07.
  31. Choi, Y-J.; Weissman, P.R.; Polishook, D. (January 2006). "(60558) 2000 EC_98". IAU Circ. (8656): 2.
  32. Jewitt, D. (2009). "The Active Centaurs". The Astronomical Journal. 137 (5): 4295–4312. arXiv:0902.4687. Bibcode:2009AJ....137.4296J. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aa689c.
  33. Womack, M.; Stern, A. (1999). "Observations of Carbon Monoxide in (2060) Chiron" (PDF). Lunar and Planetary Science XXVIII. Retrieved 2017-07-11.
  34. Mazzotta Epifani, E.; Palumbo, P.; Capria, M. T.; Cremonese, G.; Fulle, M.; Colangeli, L. (2006). "The dust coma of the active Centaur P/2004 A1 (LONEOS): a CO-driven environment?". Astronomy & Astrophysics. 460 (3): 935–944. Bibcode:2006A&A...460..935M. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20065189. Retrieved 2009-05-08.
  35. Galiazzo, M. A.; de la Fuente Marcos, C.; de la Fuente Marcos, R.; Carraro, G.; Maris, M.; Montalto, M. (2016). "Photometry of Centaurs and trans-Neptunian objects: 2060 Chiron (1977 UB), 10199 Chariklo (1997 CU26), 38628 Huya (2000 EB173), 28978 Ixion (2001 KX76), and 90482 Orcus (2004 DW)". Astrophysics and Space Science. 361 (3): 212–218. arXiv:1605.08251. Bibcode:2016Ap&SS.361..212G. doi:10.1007/s10509-016-2801-5.
  36. Galiazzo, M. A.; Wiegert, P. & Aljbaae, S. (2016). "Influence of the Centaurs and TNOs on the main belt and its families". Astrophysics and Space Science. 361 (12): 361–371. arXiv:1611.05731. Bibcode:2016Ap&SS.361..371G. doi:10.1007/s10509-016-2957-z.
  37. Stein, Zane B. (2008). "What are the Centaurs?". zanestein.com.
  38. Wan, X.-S.; Huang, T.-Y. (2001). "The orbit evolution of 32 plutinos over 100 million years". Astronomy and Astrophysics. 368 (2): 700–705. Bibcode:2001A&A...368..700W. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20010056.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.