Russia investigation origins counter-narrative

The Russia investigation origins counter-narrative or Russia counter-narrative[1] is a right-wing alternative narrative,[2][3] sometimes identified as a conspiracy theory,[4][5][6][7][8] concerning the origins of the FBI investigation and subsequent Special Counsel investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections. Both of those investigations concluded that the Russian government interfered in the election for the purpose of benefiting Donald Trump.[9][10]

Trump frequently expressed the concern that those findings called into question the legitimacy of his presidency. He attacked the Russia investigation over 1,100 times by February 2019, claiming that it was fabricated as an excuse for Hillary Clinton losing the Electoral College in 2016, that it was an "illegal hoax", and that the FBI had refused to investigate the "real collusion" between the Democrats and Russia.[11]

From the outset, conservatives tried to delegitimize the Mueller investigation. For example,[5] Republican party leaders speculated that the Mueller inquiry stemmed from a plot by members of the Obama Administration and career intelligence officials – the alleged "deep state" – to undermine Trump.[12]

On April 2, 2019, Trump personally urged investigation into the origins of the Mueller investigation.[13][14] In response, Democrats and some former law enforcement officials became concerned that Trump was abusing the power of the Department of Justice by requesting that it chase unfounded conspiracy theories that cast doubt on the Mueller report's findings.[15][16] The counter-narrative, promoted via conservative outlets such as National Review and The Federalist,[17] serves to erode interest among conservatives in the reality of Russian interference in the 2016 election.[1]

The Washington Post reported on November 22, 2019 that a forthcoming Justice Department inspector general report found the origin of the FBI investigation was properly predicated on a legal and factual basis, and the report did not support several conservative conspiracy theories about the origin.[18] On December 9, 2019, US Inspector General Michael Horowitz testified to Congress that the FBI showed no political bias at the initiation of the investigation into Trump and possible connections with Russia.[19][20][21] However, he also stated in a Senate hearing that he "could not rule out political bias as a possible motivation for the 17 errors the FBI made in applications for the Page surveillance."[22][23][24][25] In a subsequent analysis of 25 unrelated FISA warrant requests, Horowitz found a pattern of similar errors that suggested systemic sloppiness by the FBI, rather than an effort to single-out Page.[26]

The theory
Trump–Ukraine scandal
A request by U.S. president Trump (right) to Ukrainian president Zelensky (left) to investigate Joe Biden and his son sparked the scandal.
Events
People
Companies
Conspiracy theories

According to the Trump administration, the Russia investigation should never have happened in the first place[27] as it was a plot by law enforcement and intelligence officials to prevent Trump from winning the 2016 election, and to frustrate his "America First" agenda once elected.[28][29] Trump rejects the conclusion of US intelligence agencies that Russia interfered in the 2016 election, suggesting without evidence instead that hostile American officials may have planted false information that led to the Russia inquiry.[30]

Core elements of the theory include:[31]

  • Claims the Steele dossier had a role in triggering the Russian interference investigation (it had no role at all),[32][33] the accusation that it was fraudulent, was paid for by the Democratic Party,[34] and that this was not disclosed to the FISA court in wiretap applications (despite documentary evidence that the source was opposition research).[35] Conservatives also question the FBI's assessment of the credibility of Christopher Steele, a former British intelligence officer who ran the MI6 Russia desk from 2006-2009.[28]
  • Donald Trump and his supporters have described the investigations and surveillance as illegal and treasonous "spying"[36] (the spygate conspiracy theory)[37] – a "FISA abuse" narrative,[38] notably involving Susan Rice.[1] The use of the term "spying" in this context is disputed.[39][40][41][42] James Comey[43] and James A. Baker have described the investigations as necessary, appropriate, legal, and apolitical,[31][44] and FBI Director Christopher A. Wray testified that he saw "no evidence the FBI illegally monitored President Donald Trump's campaign during the 2016 election."[42]
  • That the FBI and other institutions are "dangerously biased" against Trump (the deep state conspiracy theory),[45] that Robert S. Mueller III's investigation was run by "13 [or 18] angry Democrats" and that Mueller was "highly conflicted", a claim debunked by Trump's own aides,[27] and the investigation was part of an "attempted coup", based on private texts sent by Peter Strzok expressing opposition to a Trump presidency and speculation over removal of Trump under the 25th Amendment following his firing of James Comey.[31]
  • That anti-Trump forces inside the FBI actually entrapped his advisers, and may have even planted evidence of Russian collusion.[46]

More recently, the narrative has expanded to include the fiction that Joseph Mifsud was not a Russian asset, but was a Western intelligence agent used as a counterintelligence trap for the Trump campaign,[47] and elements of the conspiracy theories related to the Trump–Ukraine scandal; it posits that Ukraine, not Russia, was responsible for election interference. The theory further claimed that Ukraine had interfered in the elections at the behest of the Democratic Party to benefit Hilary Clinton's election campaign, and that they had planted evidence that Russia was responsible and had sought to help Trump.[48] US Attorney General William Barr has reportedly traveled in person to Italy (twice) and to the United Kingdom to try to build support for this claim.[49][35] Italian Prime Minister Giuseppe Conte contradicted this, stating that Italy had "played no role in the events leading to the Russia investigation".[30]

On February 19, 2020, numerous sources revealed that lawyers for WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange told Westminster Magistrates' Court that Trump had Dana Rohrabacher visit Assange at the Ecuadoran Embassy in London on August 16, 2017. Assange had been in court fighting extradition to the United States on charges of computer intrusion as WikiLeaks had posted sensitive documents provided by whistleblower Chelsea Manning. During the August 16 meeting, Assange stated that Rohrabacher had made a quid pro quo offer of a presidential pardon to him, in exchange for Assange covering up Russian involvement by declaring that "Russia had nothing to do with the DNC leaks". Assange's lawyer said that he had evidence "that a quid pro quo was put to Assange by Rohrabacher, who was known as Putin's favorite congressman."[50][51][52] White House Press Secretary Stephanie Grisham stated that Assange's claims were "a complete fabrication and a lie" and added that "the president barely knows Dana Rohrabacher other than he's an ex-congressman."[53] Rohrabacher had previously confirmed the August 16 meeting, saying he and Assange talked about "what might be necessary to get him out" and discussed a presidential pardon in exchange for information on the theft of DNC emails that were published by WikiLeaks before the 2016 presidential election.[54]

Notable proponents

The most notable proponent is Donald Trump himself. Following the May 2018 disclosure that FBI informant Stefan Halper had spoken with Trump campaign aides Carter Page, George Papadopoulos, and Sam Clovis, Trump advanced a conspiracy theory dubbed as Spygate, which claimed that the previous administration under Barack Obama paid to plant a spy inside Trump's 2016 presidential campaign to assist his rival, Hillary Clinton, win the 2016 US presidential election.[55][56] With no actual supporting evidence produced, Trump's allegations were widely described as blatantly false.[55][57][58][59] Trump's allegations prompted the US Justice Department (DoJ) and the FBI to provide a classified briefing regarding Halper to several Congressmen, including Republicans Trey Gowdy and Paul Ryan, who concluded that the FBI did not do anything improper, and that Russia, not Trump, was the target of the FBI.[60][61]

In June 2018, Trump claimed that a report by DoJ Inspector General Michael E. Horowitz "totally exonerates" him and that "the Mueller investigation has been totally discredited", despite the report having nothing to do with the special counsel investigation, the Trump campaign or Russia. The report was instead focused on the FBI's 2016 investigation of the Hillary Clinton email controversy.[62][63][64][65]

Sean Hannity, a strong supporter of Trump, a vocal and persistent critic of the Mueller investigation on his Fox News television show and syndicated radio program, described Mueller as "corrupt, abusively biased and political."[66] Hannity had asserted that the investigation arose from an elaborate, corrupt scheme involving Hillary Clinton; the Steele dossier, which he asserts is completely false although parts of it have been reported as verified;[67] former DoJ officials James Comey, Andrew McCabe, Bruce Ohr, and others; and a wiretap on former Trump aide Carter Page that Hannity asserted was obtained by misrepresentations to the United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, characterizing the wiretap as an abuse of power that is "far bigger than Watergate" and "the weaponizing of those powerful tools of intelligence and the shredding of our Fourth Amendment, constitutional rights."[66]

Jeanine Pirro, a long-time friend of Trump,[68] described Mueller, FBI Director Christopher Wray (a Trump appointee), former FBI Director James Comey and other current/former FBI officials as a "criminal cabal,"[69] saying "There is a cleansing needed in our FBI and Department of Justice—it needs to be cleansed of individuals who should not just be fired, but who need to be taken out in cuffs."[70]

Durham inquiry

In May 2019, US Attorney General William Barr appointed John Durham, the U.S. attorney in the District of Connecticut, to oversee a DoJ probe into the origins of the FBI investigation into Russian interference.[71] The origins of the probe were already being investigated by the DoJ inspector general and by U.S. Attorney John W. Huber, who was appointed in 2018 by Jeff Sessions.[71] This caused some controversy internationally and prompted questions about potential abuse of power by the administration.[72]

The Durham inquiry has been described as an "inquiry into its own Russia investigation",[73] "investigating the investigators" of the Russian meddling in the 2016 elections,[4][74] and a cover-up to protect Trump.[75][76] Mick Mulvaney has tied the Durham investigation to the Ukraine scandal, as Durham has sought help from Ukraine and interviewed Ukrainian citizens.[28]

On May 23, 2019, Trump ordered the intelligence community to cooperate with the inquiry and granted Barr unprecedented[77] full authority to declassify any intelligence information related to the matter.[78][79][80][81] DoJ investigators, led by Durham, planned to interview senior Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) officers to determine how they concluded in 2016 that Russian president Vladimir Putin had personally authorized election interference to benefit candidate Trump.[82] Politico reported in July 2019 that after becoming CIA director in 2017, Trump loyalist Mike Pompeo intensely challenged CIA analysts on their findings that Russian interference was designed to help Trump, but he found no evidence to dispute it.[83][84] The New York Times reported in July 2018 that the CIA had long nurtured a Russian source who eventually rose to a position close to Putin, allowing the source to pass key information in 2016 about Putin's direct involvement.[85] In parallel, Trump and his allies – most notably Trump's personal attorney Rudy Giuliani — promoted an alternative narrative that the Ukrainian government had interfered to benefit Hillary Clinton, in coordination with Democrats, the digital forensics company CrowdStrike and the FBI, alleging the Russian government had been framed.[86] Trump falsely asserted that CrowdStrike, an American company, was actually owned by a wealthy Ukrainian oligarch.[10]

In September 2019 it was reported that Barr has been contacting foreign governments to ask for help in this inquiry, related to the conspiracy theories related to the Trump–Ukraine scandal. He personally traveled to the United Kingdom and Italy to seek information, and at Barr's request Trump phoned the prime minister of Australia to request his cooperation.[87] The Wall Street Journal reported in October 2019 that Barr faced backlash from Britain, Australia and Italy by circumventing normal intelligence channels to speak directly with political leaders.[88] One British official with knowledge of Barr's requests observed, "it is like nothing we have come across before, they are basically asking, in quite robust terms, for help in doing a hatchet job on their own intelligence services."[89] Barr sought information related to a conspiracy theory that Joseph Mifsud was a Western intelligence operative who allegedly entrapped Trump campaign advisor George Papadopoulos in order to establish a false predicate for the FBI to open an investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections, that had circulated among Trump allies in conservative media.

That FBI investigation was initiated after the Australian government notified American authorities that its diplomat Alexander Downer had a chance encounter with Papadopoulos, who boasted about possible access to Hillary Clinton emails supposedly held by the Russian government.[90] On October 2, 2019, Senator Lindsey Graham, a staunch Trump supporter and chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, wrote a letter to the leaders of Britain, Australia and Italy, asserting as fact that both Mifsud and Downer had been directed to contact Papadopoulos. Joe Hockey, the Australian ambassador to the United States, sharply rejected Graham's characterization of Downer.[91][92] A former Italian government official told The Washington Post in October 2019 that during a meeting the previous month, Italian intelligence services told Barr they had "no connections, no activities, no interference" in the matter; Italian prime minister Giuseppe Conte later affirmed this.[93][94] The Washington Post reported on November 22, 2019, that the Justice Department inspector general had aggressively investigated the allegation that Mifsud had been directed to entrap Papadopoulos, but found it was without merit.[18] American law enforcement believes Mifsud is connected to Russian intelligence.[95][96][6][97][98][99]

By October 2019 it was reported that Barr and Durham's investigators were, in addition to pressing foreign intelligence officials for help in discrediting the 2016 inquiry,[100][8][101] also asking about the route by which information had reached the FBI, and interviewing agents involved in the 2016 inquiry.[28][102][12] Durham also inquired about whether CIA officials had tricked the FBI into opening its 2016 investigation. Politico quoted FBI officials who were dismissive of such an assertion.[103] Although the CIA and FBI directors shared intelligence about the matters in August 2016, former government officials said the FBI did not use CIA information to open its investigation the previous month.[73] The Justice Department inspector general later confirmed this.[104] Papadopoulos had previously asserted that Mifsud was "an Italian intelligence asset who the CIA weaponized" against him. Former CIA director John Brennan, a frequent Trump critic, had been singled out for suspicion by Trump and his allies, as well as former director of national intelligence James Clapper, as supposed members of a "deep state" that allegedly sought to undermine Trump.[105][106]

On October 24, 2019, The New York Times and The Washington Post reported that Durham's inquiry had been elevated to a criminal investigation, raising concerns of politicization of the Justice Department to pursue political enemies of the President.[73][107] The Times reported on November 22 that the Justice Department inspector general had made a criminal referral to Durham regarding Kevin Clinesmith, a low-level FBI attorney who had altered an email during the process of acquiring a wiretap warrant renewal on Carter Page, and that referral appeared to be at least part of the reason Durham's investigation was elevated to criminal status.[104]

The day Justice Department inspector general Michael Horowitz released his report on the 2016 FBI Crossfire Hurricane investigation, which found the investigation was properly predicated and debunked a number of conspiracy theories regarding its origins, Durham issued a statement saying, "we do not agree with some of the report’s conclusions as to predication and how the FBI case was opened."[108][109] Many observers inside and outside the Justice Department, including the inspector general, expressed surprise that Durham would issue such a statement, as federal investigators typically do not publicly comment on their ongoing investigations.[110] Barr also released a statement challenging the findings of the report.[111] Horowitz later testified to the Senate that prior to release of the report he had asked Durham for any information he had that might change the report's findings, but "none of the discussions changed our findings."[112] The Washington Post reported that Durham could not provide evidence of any setup by American intelligence.[113]

The New York Times reported in December 2019 that Durham was examining the role of former CIA director John Brennan in assessing Russian interference in 2016, requesting emails, call logs and other documents. Brennan had been a vocal critic of Trump and a target of the president's accusations of improper activities toward him. The Times reported Durham was specifically examining Brennan's views of the Steele dossier and what he said about it to the FBI and other intelligence agencies. Brennan and former director of national intelligence James Clapper had testified to Congress that the CIA and other intelligence agencies did not rely on the dossier in preparing the January 2017 intelligence community assessment of Russian interference, and allies of Brennan said he disagreed with the FBI view that the dossier should be given significant weight, as the CIA characterized it as "internet rumor."[114]

In February 2020, The Washington Post reported that Trump was pressing the Justice Department for Durham to finish his investigation, so that Trump could use information gathered from it in his reelection campaign.[115]

Justice Department Inspector General report and Congressional testimony

The Washington Post reported on November 22, 2019, that the Justice Department inspector general had aggressively investigated the allegation that Mifsud had been directed to entrap Papadopoulos, but found it was without merit.[18]

On December 9, 2019, Horowitz testified before the House Judiciary Committee that his investigation found that despite mistakes in organizing the investigation, the FBI did not display any political bias when initiating the investigation of Trump and the Russian government.[19][20][21] However, he also stated in a Senate hearing that he "could not rule out political bias as a possible motivation for the 17 errors the FBI made in applications for the Page surveillance."[22][23][24][25]

See also

References
  1. Kilgore, Ed (April 4, 2017). "Susan Rice Becomes the Face of the Trump Counter-Narrative on Russia".
  2. "Why is Barr investigating origins of Russia Probe? - CNN Video". October 12, 2019. Retrieved October 21, 2019.
  3. Walsh, David A. (July 15, 2018). "How the right-wing convinces itself that liberals are evil". Washington Monthly. July/August 2018. ISSN 0043-0633. Retrieved October 21, 2019.
  4. Sullivan, Andy (October 2, 2019). "Explainer: Barr gives top priority to investigating the investigators of Russian meddling". Reuters. Retrieved October 21, 2019.
  5. Zapotosky, Matt; Dawsey, Josh (October 6, 2019). "Barr's review of Russia investigation wins Trump's favor. Those facing scrutiny suspect he's chasing conspiracy theories". The Washington Post. Retrieved October 21, 2019.
  6. Lutz, Eric (July 24, 2019). "Republicans Use Mueller's Silence to Push Conspiracy Theories". Vanity Fair. Retrieved October 20, 2019.
  7. "Trump promotes conspiracy theory: Clinton's deleted emails are in Ukraine". Retrieved October 20, 2019.
  8. Ward, Alex (September 30, 2019). "The right-wing conspiracy theories behind Trump and Barr's outreach to foreign leaders". Retrieved October 21, 2019.
  9. "Mueller finds no conspiracy, but report shows Trump welcomed Russian help". Los Angeles Times. April 18, 2019. Retrieved October 21, 2019.
  10. Shane, Scott (October 3, 2019). "How a Fringe Theory About Ukraine Took Root in the White House". The New York Times.
  11. Buchanan, Larry; Yourish, Karen (February 19, 2019). "Trump Has Publicly Attacked the Russia Investigation More Than 1,100 Times". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved October 23, 2019.
  12. "AG Barr expands mysterious review into origin of Russia investigation". Retrieved October 21, 2019.
  13. "Trump repeatedly fails in attempt to say 'origins' then claims noise from wind farms causes cancer". April 3, 2019. Retrieved October 20, 2019.
  14. "Trump asks journalists to look into the 'oranges' of the Mueller investigation – video". The Guardian. April 3, 2019. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved October 20, 2019.
  15. "Justice department opens criminal inquiry into origins of Russia investigation – report". The Guardian. October 25, 2019. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved October 25, 2019.staff, Guardian; agencies (October 25, 2019). "Justice department opens criminal inquiry into origins of Russia investigation – report". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved October 25, 2019.
  16. Benner, Katie; Goldman, Adam (October 24, 2019). "Justice Dept. Is Said to Shift to Criminal Inquiry of Russia Investigation's Origins". The New York Times.
  17. Gregory, Paul Roderick. "Is Russiagate Really Hillarygate?". Forbes.
  18. Nakashima, Ellen; Zapotosky, Matt. "Justice Dept. watchdog finds political bias did not taint top officials running the FBI's Russia probe but documents errors". Washington Post.
  19. "Read the full text: Justice Department watchdog report into origins of Russia probe". NBC News. Retrieved December 9, 2019.
  20. Barrett, Devlin (December 9, 2019). "Inspector general report says FBI had 'authorized purpose' to investigate Trump campaign's Russia ties but finds some wrongdoing". Washington Post. Retrieved December 9, 2019.
  21. Breuninger, Kevin (December 9, 2019). "Justice Department watchdog finds Trump-Russia probe was not tainted by political bias". CNBC. Retrieved December 9, 2019.
  22. Dilanian, Ken (December 11, 2019). "DOJ watchdog tells Senate he has deep concerns about FBI errors in Russia probe". NBC News. Retrieved December 29, 2019.
  23. Lucas, Ryan; Ewing, Philip (December 9, 2019). "DOJ Watchdog On Russia Probe: No Evidence Of Bias, But Problems With Surveillance". NPR.org. Retrieved December 29, 2019.
  24. Budryk, Zack (December 11, 2019). "Horowitz: 'We found no bias' in decision to open probe". The Hill. Retrieved December 29, 2019.
  25. Cournoyer, Caroline; Herridge, Catherine; Watson, Kathryn; Quinn, Melissa (December 11, 2019). "Horowitz defends his Trump-Russia report but is "deeply concerned" about FBI's surveillance failures". CBS News. Retrieved December 29, 2019.
  26. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/31/us/politics/fbi-fisa-wiretap-trump.html
  27. "AP FACT CHECK: Trump, AG spread untruths on Mueller Report". April 22, 2019. Retrieved October 23, 2019.
  28. Goldman, Adam; Rashbaum, William K. (October 19, 2019). "Review of Russia Inquiry Grows as F.B.I. Witnesses Are Questioned". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved October 23, 2019.
  29. "It's a sideshow — we both must focus on Indo-Pacific — United States Studies Centre". ussc.edu.au. Retrieved October 23, 2019."It's a sideshow — we both must focus on Indo-Pacific — United States Studies Centre". ussc.edu.au. Retrieved October 23, 2019.
  30. Momigliano, Anna (October 23, 2019). "Italy Did Not Fuel U.S. Suspicion of Russian Meddling, Prime Minister Says". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved October 25, 2019.
  31. Bump, Philip (May 10, 2019). "The Deep State strikes back: Former FBI leaders rebut questions about the Russia investigation". The Washington Post. Retrieved May 12, 2019.
  32. Kiely, Eugene; Robertson, Lori; Farley, Robert (December 10, 2019). "How Old Claims Compare to IG Report". FactCheck.org. Retrieved May 30, 2020.
  33. Rupar, Aaron (March 22, 2019). "Fox News has normalized a lie about the origins of the Russia investigation". Retrieved October 23, 2019.Rupar, Aaron (March 22, 2019). "Fox News has normalized a lie about the origins of the Russia investigation". Retrieved October 23, 2019.
  34. https://www.factcheck.org/2018/02/trumps-spin-democratic-memo
  35. Blake, Aaron (October 1, 2019). "Barr's probing of Australia, Britain and Italy suggests a conspiracy focus". Washington Post. Retrieved October 23, 2019.
  36. Wagner, John (May 17, 2019). "Trump warns of 'long jail sentences' for those involved in 'spying' on his 2016 campaign". The Washington Post. Retrieved May 17, 2019.
  37. "Seething over Russia probe, Trump tears into 'spygate'". May 24, 2018. Retrieved October 23, 2019.
  38. "The Russia Investigations: Is 'FISA Abuse' Out Of Steam? Intel Committees On Edge?". Retrieved October 23, 2019.
  39. Crowe, Jack (April 12, 2019). "Comey on Barr's 'Spying' Claim: 'I Have No Idea What He's Talking About'". National Review. Retrieved April 14, 2019. When I hear that kind of language used, it's concerning, because the FBI and the Department of Justice conduct court-ordered electronic surveillance. I have never thought of that as spying.
  40. Shortell, David (May 7, 2019). "FBI Director Wray distances himself from Barr's use of 'spying' on Trump campaign". CNN. Retrieved May 7, 2019. I believe that the FBI is engaged in investigative activity and part of investigative activity includes surveillance activity of different shapes and sizes. To me the key question is making sure that it's done by the book consistent with our lawful authorities.
  41. Cheney, Kyle; Galioto, Katie (April 10, 2019). "Pelosi: Barr is 'going off the rails'". Politico. Retrieved April 15, 2019.
  42. Tucker, Eric; Balsamo, Michael (May 7, 2019). "FBI chief: No evidence of illegal spying on Trump campaign". Associated Press. Retrieved May 14, 2019.
  43. "Transcript: Town Hall Meeting with Former FBI Director James Comey". CNN. May 9, 2019. Retrieved May 12, 2019.
  44. Miller, Maggie (May 10, 2019). "Former FBI lawyer defends agency's probe into Trump campaign officials". The Hill. Retrieved May 12, 2019. Baker emphasized that the FBI's investigation into Russian interference in the election did not focus on the Trump campaign officials' interactions with Russia until a 'trusted, reliable foreign partner' sent information to the agency that George Papadopoulos, a former campaign aide, was interacting with 'a person who claimed to have email dirt on Hillary Clinton... The important thing to remember...was the case was about Russia.... It was about Russia, period, full stop. That was the focus of the investigation. When the Papadopoulos information comes across our radar screen, it's coming across in the sense that we were always looking at Russia.
  45. Fandos, Nicholas (December 30, 2017). "Republican Attacks on Mueller and F.B.I. Open New Rift in G.O.P." The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved October 23, 2019.
  46. Nast, Condé. "Trump's Fear of a Deep State Coup Has Become Full-Blown Hysteria". Retrieved October 23, 2019.
  47. Goldman, Adam (October 6, 2019). "Italy's Connection to the Russia Investigation, Explained". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved October 23, 2019.
  48. Poulsen, Kevin (September 25, 2019). "The Truth About Trump's Insane Ukraine 'Server' Conspiracy". The Daily Beast. Archived from the original on October 11, 2019. Retrieved September 27, 2019.
  49. "Italy's Spy Chief Met Twice With Barr to Aid Inquiry: Repubblica". Retrieved October 24, 2019.
  50. Booth, William; Nakashima, Ellen (February 19, 2020). "Assange lawyer claims congressman offered pardon on behalf of Trump in exchange for absolving Russia in WikiLeaks DNC case". The Washington Post. Retrieved February 19, 2020.
  51. Hines, Nico (February 19, 2020). "Trump Offered Assange Pardon if He Covered Up Russian Hack, WikiLeaks Founder's Lawyer Claims". The Daily Beast. Retrieved February 19, 2020.
  52. Mangan, Dan (February 19, 2020). "Trump offered WikiLeaks' Julian Assange a pardon if he covered up Russian hacking of Democrats, lawyer tells court". CNBC. Retrieved February 20, 2020.
  53. Bowcott, Owen and Julian Borger (February 19, 2020). "Donald Trump 'offered Julian Assange a pardon if he denied Russia link to hack'". The Guardian. Retrieved February 19, 2020.
  54. Mai-Duc, Christine (August 17, 2017). "Rohrabacher on meeting with WikiLeaks' Assange: We talked about 'what might be necessary to get him out'". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved February 20, 2020.
  55. Beauchamp, Zack. ""Spygate," the false allegation that the FBI had a spy in the Trump campaign, explained". Vox. Archived from the original on May 28, 2018. Retrieved June 2, 2018.
  56. Tatum, Sophie. "Carter Page: I 'never found anything unusual' in conversations with FBI source". CNN. Archived from the original on May 23, 2018. Retrieved June 2, 2018.
  57. Davis, Julie; Haberman, Maggie. "With 'Spygate,' Trump Shows How He Uses Conspiracy Theories to Erode Trust". The New York Times. Archived from the original on May 28, 2018. Retrieved May 29, 2018.
  58. Bump, Philip. "There is no evidence for 'Spygate' — but there is a reason Trump invented it". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on June 3, 2018. Retrieved June 1, 2018.
  59. Darcy, James. "'Spygate' is just latest Trump lie: Darcy cartoon". cleveland.com. Archived from the original on May 31, 2018. Retrieved June 2, 2018.
  60. Foran, Clare. "Gowdy says FBI 'did exactly what my fellow citizens would want them to do' in Russia investigation". CNN. Retrieved May 30, 2018.
  61. Demirjian, Karoun; DeBonis, Mike. "Paul Ryan splits with Trump, says 'no evidence' FBI spied on president's campaign". The Washington Post. Retrieved June 7, 2018.
  62. Greenberg, Jon; Jacobson, Louis; McCarthy, Bill; Sherman, Amy. "Fact-checking Donald Trump's interviews with Fox and Friends, reporters on the White House lawn". Politifact. Retrieved June 18, 2018.
  63. Naylor, Brian. "Trump Weighs In On IG Report, North Korea, Immigration In Impromptu News Conference". NPR. Retrieved June 18, 2018.
  64. Higgins, Tucker. "Trump says Clinton email report 'totally exonerates me' — but that's not true". CNBC. Retrieved June 18, 2018.
  65. Stracqualursi, Veronica. "Trump: IG report 'destroys' ex-FBI Director Comey". CNN. Retrieved June 18, 2018.
  66. Bowden, John (January 18, 2018). "Hannity tells Mueller: 'Your witch hunt is now over'". The Hill. Retrieved February 24, 2018.
  67. Sciutto, Jim; Perez, Evan. "US investigators corroborate some aspects of the Russia dossier". CNN. Retrieved February 24, 2018.
  68. Grynbaum, Michael M. (December 22, 2017). "Jeanine Pirro of Fox News Helps an Old Friend: President Trump". The New York Times. Retrieved February 25, 2018.
  69. Hains, Tim (December 17, 2017). "Pirro Doubles Down: Andrew McCabe Is "Consigliere" Of The FBI "Criminal Cabal"". Real Clear Politics. Retrieved February 25, 2018.
  70. Tesfaye, Sophia (December 10, 2017). ""It's time to take them out in cuffs": Fox News' Jeanine Pirro calls for a purge of the FBI". Salon. Retrieved February 25, 2018.
  71. Balsamo, Michael (May 14, 2019). "AP source: Barr launches new look at origins of Russia probe". Associated Press. Retrieved September 29, 2019.
  72. Shubber, Kadhim (October 14, 2019). "Trump's attorney-general investigates the investigators". ft.com. Retrieved October 21, 2019.
  73. Benner, Katie; Goldman, Adam (October 24, 2019). "Justice Dept. Is Said to Open Criminal Inquiry Into Its Own Russia Investigation". The New York Times. Retrieved October 25, 2019.
  74. Berenson, Tessa (October 4, 2019). "Meet John Durham, The Man Tasked With 'Investigating the Investigators'". Time. Retrieved October 25, 2019.
  75. Willis, Jay (September 27, 2019). "How Bill Barr Turned the Justice Department Into a Cover-up Operation". GQ. Retrieved October 25, 2019.
  76. Walters, Greg (September 25, 2019). "Trump's Ukraine Scandal Is Also Attorney General Bill Barr's Scandal". Vice. Retrieved October 25, 2019.
  77. Alexandra Hutzler On 5/24/19 at 2:42 PM EDT (May 24, 2019). "Legal experts accuse Donald Trump and William Barr of engaging in a "corrupt act of political retribution"". Retrieved October 20, 2019.
  78. Haberman, Maggie; Schmidt, Michael S. (May 23, 2019). "Trump Gives Attorney General Sweeping Power in Review of 2016 Campaign Inquiry". The New York Times. Retrieved October 21, 2019.
  79. Riechmann, Deb (May 24, 2019). "Critics worry AG will reveal Russia probe info to help Trump". Associated Press. Retrieved September 29, 2019.
  80. Bertrand, Natasha (May 24, 2019). "Trump puts DOJ on crash course with intelligence agencies". Politico. Retrieved September 29, 2019.
  81. Harris, Shane (May 24, 2019). "Barr could expose secrets, politicize intelligence with review of Russia probe, current and former officials fear". Washington Post.
  82. Barnes, Julian E.; Benner, Katie; Goldman, Adam; Schmidt, Michael S. (June 12, 2019). "Justice Dept. Seeks to Question C.I.A. in Its Own Russia Investigation". The New York Times.
  83. Bertrand, Natasha. "'This wasn't just a briefing': Pompeo grilled CIA analysts on Russia findings". POLITICO.
  84. "Durham's Russia Probe Reportedly Sought Former CIA Director John Brennan's Communications". lawandcrime.com.
  85. Sanger, David E.; Rosenberg, Matthew (July 18, 2018). "From the Start, Trump Has Muddied a Clear Message: Putin Interfered". The New York Times.
  86. Stolberg, Sheryl Gay; Haberman, Maggie; Baker, Peter (September 29, 2019). "Trump Was Repeatedly Warned That Ukraine Conspiracy Theory Was 'Completely Debunked'". The New York Times.
  87. Prokop, Andrew (September 30, 2019). "Trump and Barr have been urging foreign governments to help them investigate the Mueller probe's origins". Vox. Retrieved October 1, 2019.
  88. Viswanatha, Aruna; Gurman, Sadie; Legorano, Giovanni. "Barr's Requests for Foreign Help Prompt Backlash in Australia, Italy, U.K." The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved October 9, 2019.
  89. "UK intelligence officials shaken by Trump administration's requests for help with counter-impeachment inquiry". The Independent. November 1, 2019.
  90. Mazzetti, Mark; Benner, Katie (September 30, 2019). "Trump Pressed Australian Leader to Help Barr Investigate Mueller Inquiry's Origins". The New York Times.
  91. Mazzetti, Mark; Goldman, Adam; Benner, Katie (October 6, 2019). "Barr and a Top Prosecutor Cast a Wide Net in Reviewing the Russia Inquiry". The New York Times. Retrieved October 21, 2019.
  92. https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/LOG%20to%20Australia%20Italy%20UK.pdf
  93. Zapotosky, Matt; Dawsey, Josh; Harris, Shane; Helderman, Rosalind S. (October 6, 2019). "Barr's review of Russia investigation wins Trump's favor. Those facing scrutiny suspect he's chasing conspiracy theories". washingtonpost.com.
  94. Momigliano, Anna (October 23, 2019). "Italy Did Not Fuel U.S. Suspicion of Russian Meddling, Prime Minister Says". The New York Times.
  95. Mazzetti, Mark; Benner, Katie (September 30, 2019). "Trump Pressed Australian Leader to Help Barr Investigate Mueller Inquiry's Origins". The New York Times.
  96. Horowitz, Jason (October 2, 2019). "First Barr, Now Pompeo: Italy Is Hub of Impeachment Intrigue for Trump Officials". The New York Times.
  97. Giuffrida, Angela (October 2, 2019). "US attorney general 'met Italian officials to discuss Russiagate'". The Guardian.
  98. Bump, Philip (October 1, 2019). "Analysis | Government-by-conspiracy-theory rides again". washingtonpost.com.
  99. Helderman, Rosalind S. "'The enigma of the entire Mueller probe': Focus on origins of Russian investigation puts spotlight on Maltese professor". Washington Post.
  100. Sandler, Rachel. "Trump Reportedly Asked Australian Prime Minister For Help Investigating Mueller Inquiry Origins". Retrieved October 21, 2019.
  101. Barrett, Devlin; Harris, Shane; Zapotosky, Matt; Post, The Washington (October 1, 2019). "Barr personally asked foreign officials to aid inquiry into CIA, FBI activities in 2016". Retrieved October 21, 2019.
  102. "Investigation into Trump-Russia probe continues to grow". Retrieved October 21, 2019.
  103. "Trump's quest for vengeance against John Brennan". POLITICO.
  104. Goldman, Adam; Savage, Charlie (November 22, 2019). "Russia Inquiry Review Is Said to Criticize F.B.I. but Rebuff Claims of Biased Acts" – via NYTimes.com.
  105. Benner, Katie; Goldman, Adam (October 24, 2019). "Justice Dept. Is Said to Open Criminal Inquiry Into Its Own Russia Investigation". The New York Times.
  106. Helderman, Rosalind; Harris, Shane; Nakashima, Ellen (June 30, 2019). "'The enigma of the entire Mueller probe': Focus on origins of Russian investigation puts spotlight on Maltese professor". The Washington Post. Retrieved October 25, 2019.
  107. Zapotosky, Matt (October 24, 2019). "Justice Dept. investigation of Russia probe is criminal in nature, person familiar with case says". The Washington Post. Retrieved October 26, 2019.
  108. Savage, Charlie; Goldman, Adam; Benner, Katie (December 9, 2019). "Report on F.B.I. Russia Inquiry Finds Serious Errors but Debunks Anti-Trump Plot" – via NYTimes.com.
  109. "Statement of U.S. Attorney John H. Durham". www.justice.gov. December 9, 2019.
  110. Zapotosky, Matt. "John Durham has a stellar reputation for investigating corruption. Some fear his work for Barr could tarnish it". Washington Post.
  111. "Statement by Attorney General William P. Barr on the Inspector General's Report of the Review of Four FISA Applications and Other Aspects of the FBI's Crossfire Hurricane Investigation". www.justice.gov. December 9, 2019.
  112. "Horowitz pushes back at Barr over basis for Trump-Russia probe". POLITICO.
  113. Zapotosky, Matt. "Barr's handpicked prosecutor tells inspector general he can't back right-wing theory that Russia case was U.S. intelligence setup". Washington Post.
  114. Benner, Katie; Barnes, Julian E. (December 19, 2019). "Durham Is Scrutinizing Ex-C.I.A. Director's Role in Russian Interference Findings" – via NYTimes.com.
  115. Barrett, Devlin; Zapotosky, Matt; Dawsey, Josh. "Barr pushes back against Trump's criticism of Justice Dept., says tweets 'make it impossible for me to do my job'". Washington Post. Retrieved February 16, 2020.

Further reading
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.