2008–09 Sussex County Football League
The 2008–09 Sussex County Football League season was the 84th in the history of the competition.[1][2]
Season | 2008–2009 |
---|---|
Champions | Eastbourne United Association |
← 2007–08 2009–10 → |
Division One
League table
Season | 2008–09 |
---|---|
Champions | Eastbourne United Association |
Relegated | East Preston, Oakwood, Worthing United |
Matches played | 380 |
Goals scored | 1,285 (3.38 per match) |
← 2007–08 2009–10 → |
Pos | Team | Pld | W | D | L | GF | GA | GR | Pts | Qualification or relegation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Eastbourne United Association | 38 | 23 | 6 | 9 | 79 | 37 | 2.135 | 75 | League champions |
2 | Arundel | 38 | 21 | 10 | 7 | 96 | 53 | 1.811 | 73 | |
3 | Horsham YMCA | 38 | 23 | 4 | 11 | 72 | 53 | 1.358 | 73 | Promoted to Isthmian League |
4 | Wick | 38 | 21 | 8 | 9 | 77 | 60 | 1.283 | 71 | |
5 | Three Bridges United | 38 | 20 | 7 | 11 | 75 | 51 | 1.471 | 67 | |
6 | Shoreham | 38 | 18 | 11 | 9 | 63 | 45 | 1.400 | 65 | |
7 | Redhill | 38 | 16 | 13 | 9 | 70 | 43 | 1.628 | 61 | |
8 | Lingfield | 38 | 14 | 15 | 9 | 62 | 51 | 1.216 | 57 | |
9 | Selsey | 38 | 14 | 9 | 15 | 59 | 48 | 1.229 | 51 | |
10 | Pagham | 38 | 13 | 9 | 16 | 51 | 59 | 0.864 | 48 | |
11 | St Francis Rangers | 38 | 13 | 8 | 17 | 64 | 65 | 0.985 | 47 | |
12 | Whitehawk | 38 | 13 | 8 | 17 | 62 | 64 | 0.969 | 47 | |
13 | Chichester City United | 38 | 19 | 5 | 14 | 74 | 70 | 1.057 | 43 | |
14 | Hailsham Town | 38 | 12 | 7 | 19 | 54 | 92 | 0.587 | 43 | |
15 | Ringmer | 38 | 19 | 5 | 14 | 86 | 60 | 1.433 | 42 | |
16 | Hassocks | 38 | 10 | 10 | 18 | 4 | 61 | 0.066 | 40 | |
17 | East Grinstead Town | 38 | 8 | 9 | 21 | 54 | 84 | 0.643 | 33 | |
18 | East Preston | 38 | 9 | 5 | 24 | 53 | 85 | 0.624 | 32 | Relegated to Division 2 |
19 | Oakwood | 38 | 8 | 5 | 25 | 43 | 97 | 0.443 | 29 | |
20 | Worthing United | 38 | 4 | 10 | 24 | 42 | 107 | 0.393 | 22 |
Source: Non-League Matters
Rules for classification: 1) points; 2) goal difference; 3) number of goals scored.
The points system: 3 points for a win, 1 point for a draw and 0 points for losing.
Rules for classification: 1) points; 2) goal difference; 3) number of goals scored.
The points system: 3 points for a win, 1 point for a draw and 0 points for losing.
Division Two
League table
Season | 2008–09 |
---|---|
Champions | Peacehaven & Telscombe |
Relegated | Sidlesham |
Promoted | Peacehaven & Telscombe, Mile Oak, Crawley Down |
Matches played | 306 |
Goals scored | 1,054 (3.44 per match) |
← 2007–08 2009–10 → |
Pos | Team | Pld | W | D | L | GF | GA | GR | Pts | Qualification or relegation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Peacehaven & Telscombe | 34 | 25 | 5 | 4 | 104 | 31 | 3.355 | 80 | League champions, Promoted to Division 1 |
2 | Mile Oak | 34 | 24 | 3 | 7 | 92 | 35 | 2.629 | 75 | Promoted to Division 1 |
3 | Crawley Down | 34 | 19 | 10 | 5 | 77 | 33 | 2.333 | 67 | |
4 | Rustington | 34 | 20 | 4 | 10 | 66 | 39 | 1.692 | 64 | |
5 | Westfield | 34 | 17 | 8 | 9 | 57 | 46 | 1.239 | 59 | |
6 | Rye United | 34 | 16 | 8 | 10 | 66 | 45 | 1.467 | 56 | |
7 | Seaford Town | 34 | 16 | 5 | 13 | 61 | 56 | 1.089 | 56 | |
8 | Sidley United | 34 | 12 | 9 | 13 | 49 | 57 | 0.860 | 45 | |
9 | Lancing | 34 | 12 | 6 | 16 | 55 | 65 | 0.846 | 42 | |
10 | Loxwood | 34 | 11 | 8 | 15 | 44 | 49 | 0.898 | 41 | |
11 | Southwick | 34 | 12 | 5 | 17 | 58 | 71 | 0.817 | 41 | |
12 | Storrington | 34 | 12 | 5 | 17 | 43 | 58 | 0.741 | 41 | |
13 | Steyning Town | 34 | 12 | 6 | 16 | 42 | 67 | 0.627 | 39 | |
14 | Littlehampton Town | 34 | 9 | 10 | 15 | 65 | 82 | 0.793 | 37 | |
15 | Wealden | 34 | 10 | 6 | 18 | 57 | 69 | 0.826 | 36 | |
16 | Midhurst & Easebourne | 34 | 9 | 6 | 19 | 46 | 74 | 0.622 | 33 | |
17 | Bexhill United | 34 | 8 | 6 | 20 | 45 | 67 | 0.672 | 30 | Relegated to Division 3 |
18 | Sidlesham | 34 | 3 | 8 | 23 | 27 | 110 | 0.245 | 17 |
Source: Non-League Matters
Rules for classification: 1) points; 2) goal difference; 3) number of goals scored.
The points system: 3 points for a win, 1 point for a draw and 0 points for losing.
Rules for classification: 1) points; 2) goal difference; 3) number of goals scored.
The points system: 3 points for a win, 1 point for a draw and 0 points for losing.
Division Three
League table
Season | 2008–09 |
---|---|
Champions | Clymping |
Promoted | Clymping, Little Common |
Matches played | 182 |
Goals scored | 657 (3.61 per match) |
← 2007–08 2009–10 → |
Pos | Team | Pld | W | D | L | GF | GA | GR | Pts | Qualification or relegation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Clymping | 26 | 19 | 3 | 4 | 70 | 29 | 2.414 | 60 | League champions, Promoted to Division 2 |
2 | Little Common | 26 | 18 | 3 | 5 | 66 | 37 | 1.784 | 57 | Promoted to Division 2 |
3 | Haywards Heath Town | 26 | 17 | 4 | 5 | 57 | 20 | 2.850 | 55 | |
4 | Newhaven | 26 | 15 | 6 | 5 | 64 | 40 | 1.600 | 51 | |
5 | Dorking Wanderers | 26 | 15 | 2 | 9 | 70 | 45 | 1.556 | 47 | |
6 | Forest | 26 | 11 | 7 | 8 | 40 | 33 | 1.212 | 40 | |
7 | Saltdean United | 26 | 10 | 6 | 10 | 32 | 42 | 0.762 | 36 | |
8 | Uckfield Town | 26 | 10 | 4 | 12 | 47 | 48 | 0.979 | 34 | |
9 | Broadbridge Heath | 26 | 8 | 3 | 15 | 41 | 57 | 0.719 | 27 | |
10 | Bosham | 26 | 7 | 5 | 14 | 35 | 53 | 0.660 | 26 | |
11 | Rottingdean | 26 | 5 | 10 | 11 | 31 | 48 | 0.646 | 25 | |
12 | Ifield Edwards | 26 | 6 | 6 | 14 | 39 | 48 | 0.813 | 24 | |
13 | Hurstpierpoint | 26 | 4 | 4 | 18 | 35 | 75 | 0.467 | 16 | |
14 | Pease Pottage | 26 | 4 | 3 | 19 | 30 | 76 | 0.395 | 15 |
Source: Non-League Matters
Rules for classification: 1) points; 2) goal difference; 3) number of goals scored.
The points system: 3 points for a win, 1 point for a draw and 0 points for losing.
Rules for classification: 1) points; 2) goal difference; 3) number of goals scored.
The points system: 3 points for a win, 1 point for a draw and 0 points for losing.
References
- "Sussex County Football League 2003–2012". Non League Matters.
- "SCFL Historic League Tables". Southern Combination Football League. Archived from the original on 2019-01-19. Retrieved 2019-02-08.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.