2000–01 Sussex County Football League
The 2000–2001 Sussex County Football League season was the 76th in the history of the competition.[1][2]
Season | 2000–2001 |
---|---|
Champions | Sidley United |
2001–02 → |
Division One
League table
Season | 2000–01 |
---|---|
Champions | Sidley United |
Relegated | Lancing, Eastbourne Town, East Preston |
Matches played | 380 |
Goals scored | 1,243 (3.27 per match) |
2001–02 → |
Pos | Team | Pld | W | D | L | GF | GA | GR | Pts | Qualification or relegation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Sidley United | 38 | 25 | 8 | 5 | 65 | 31 | 2.097 | 83 | League champions |
2 | Burgess Hill Town | 38 | 23 | 9 | 6 | 77 | 46 | 1.674 | 78 | |
3 | Wick | 38 | 19 | 10 | 9 | 78 | 51 | 1.529 | 67 | |
4 | Selsey | 38 | 20 | 5 | 13 | 68 | 48 | 1.417 | 65 | |
5 | Horsham YMCA | 38 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 74 | 54 | 1.370 | 63 | |
6 | Pagham | 38 | 17 | 11 | 10 | 78 | 56 | 1.393 | 62 | |
7 | Chichester City United | 38 | 17 | 6 | 15 | 82 | 67 | 1.224 | 57 | |
8 | Three Bridges United | 38 | 16 | 9 | 13 | 61 | 59 | 1.034 | 57 | |
9 | Sidlesham | 38 | 17 | 6 | 15 | 64 | 64 | 1.000 | 57 | |
10 | Ringmer | 38 | 17 | 5 | 16 | 55 | 67 | 0.821 | 56 | |
11 | Eastbourne United | 38 | 14 | 10 | 14 | 60 | 53 | 1.132 | 52 | |
12 | Hassocks | 38 | 15 | 5 | 18 | 57 | 58 | 0.983 | 50 | |
13 | Arundel | 38 | 14 | 8 | 16 | 52 | 68 | 0.765 | 50 | |
14 | Redhill | 38 | 13 | 8 | 17 | 62 | 66 | 0.939 | 47 | |
15 | Littlehampton Town | 38 | 11 | 10 | 17 | 57 | 61 | 0.934 | 43 | |
16 | Saltdean United | 38 | 11 | 8 | 19 | 54 | 73 | 0.740 | 41 | |
17 | Whitehawk | 38 | 9 | 11 | 18 | 53 | 73 | 0.726 | 38 | |
18 | Lancing | 38 | 9 | 10 | 19 | 58 | 77 | 0.753 | 37 | Relegated to Division 2 |
19 | Eastbourne Town | 38 | 9 | 8 | 21 | 47 | 66 | 0.712 | 35 | |
20 | East Preston | 38 | 7 | 3 | 28 | 41 | 105 | 0.390 | 24 |
Source: Non-League Matters
Rules for classification: 1) points; 2) goal difference; 3) number of goals scored.
The points system: 3 points for a win, 1 point for a draw and 0 points for losing.
Rules for classification: 1) points; 2) goal difference; 3) number of goals scored.
The points system: 3 points for a win, 1 point for a draw and 0 points for losing.
Division Two
League table
Season | 2000–01 |
---|---|
Champions | Southwick |
Relegated | Crowborough Athletic, Lingfield |
Promoted | Southwick, Peacehaven & Telscombe, Hailsham Town |
Matches played | 306 |
Goals scored | 1,084 (3.54 per match) |
2001–02 → |
Pos | Team | Pld | W | D | L | GF | GA | GR | Pts | Qualification or relegation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Southwick | 34 | 23 | 3 | 8 | 76 | 32 | 2.375 | 72 | League champions, Promoted to Division 1 |
2 | Peacehaven & Telscombe | 34 | 22 | 5 | 7 | 66 | 36 | 1.833 | 71 | Promoted to Division 1 |
3 | Hailsham Town | 34 | 20 | 6 | 8 | 81 | 43 | 1.884 | 66 | |
4 | East Grinstead Town | 34 | 19 | 6 | 9 | 58 | 37 | 1.568 | 63 | |
5 | Broadbridge Heath | 34 | 18 | 7 | 9 | 80 | 43 | 1.860 | 61 | |
6 | Worthing United | 34 | 18 | 6 | 10 | 77 | 46 | 1.674 | 60 | |
7 | Oving | 34 | 16 | 6 | 12 | 64 | 50 | 1.280 | 54 | |
8 | Westfield | 34 | 13 | 9 | 12 | 49 | 52 | 0.942 | 48 | |
9 | Oakwood | 34 | 12 | 10 | 12 | 55 | 50 | 1.100 | 46 | |
10 | Bosham | 34 | 13 | 6 | 15 | 48 | 73 | 0.658 | 45 | |
11 | Wealden | 34 | 12 | 8 | 14 | 61 | 59 | 1.034 | 44 | |
12 | Storrington | 34 | 12 | 5 | 17 | 54 | 75 | 0.720 | 41 | |
13 | Shoreham | 34 | 12 | 4 | 18 | 67 | 84 | 0.798 | 40 | |
14 | Shinewater Association | 34 | 12 | 4 | 18 | 57 | 78 | 0.731 | 40 | |
15 | Mile Oak | 34 | 11 | 6 | 17 | 66 | 69 | 0.957 | 39 | |
16 | Crawley Down | 34 | 10 | 7 | 17 | 50 | 68 | 0.735 | 37 | |
17 | Crowborough Athletic | 34 | 6 | 7 | 21 | 49 | 79 | 0.620 | 25 | Relegated to Division 3 |
18 | Lingfield | 34 | 3 | 3 | 28 | 26 | 110 | 0.236 | 12 |
Source: Non-League Matters
Rules for classification: 1) points; 2) goal difference; 3) number of goals scored.
The points system: 3 points for a win, 1 point for a draw and 0 points for losing.
Rules for classification: 1) points; 2) goal difference; 3) number of goals scored.
The points system: 3 points for a win, 1 point for a draw and 0 points for losing.
Division Three
League table
Season | 2000–01 |
---|---|
Champions | Rye United |
Promoted | Rye United, Seaford Town |
Matches played | 210 |
Goals scored | 773 (3.68 per match) |
2001–02 → |
Pos | Team | Pld | W | D | L | GF | GA | GR | Pts | Qualification or relegation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Rye United | 28 | 21 | 3 | 4 | 89 | 38 | 2.342 | 66 | League champions, Promoted to Division 2 |
2 | Seaford Town | 28 | 20 | 2 | 6 | 70 | 33 | 2.121 | 62 | Promoted to Division 2 |
3 | Haywards Heath Town | 28 | 19 | 5 | 4 | 62 | 60 | 1.033 | 62 | |
4 | Steyning Town | 28 | 15 | 5 | 8 | 51 | 43 | 1.186 | 50 | |
5 | Franklands Village | 28 | 12 | 7 | 9 | 62 | 38 | 1.632 | 43 | |
6 | Ifield | 28 | 12 | 5 | 11 | 58 | 57 | 1.018 | 41 | |
7 | TSC | 28 | 10 | 8 | 10 | 58 | 53 | 1.094 | 38 | |
8 | St Francis | 29 | 9 | 10 | 10 | 49 | 53 | 0.925 | 37 | |
9 | Uckfield Town | 28 | 11 | 2 | 15 | 45 | 60 | 0.750 | 35 | |
10 | Ansty Rangers | 28 | 10 | 4 | 14 | 51 | 63 | 0.810 | 34 | |
11 | Bexhill Town | 28 | 8 | 5 | 15 | 37 | 51 | 0.725 | 29 | |
12 | Forest | 28 | 6 | 10 | 12 | 39 | 45 | 0.867 | 28 | |
13 | Hurstpierpoint | 28 | 6 | 6 | 16 | 37 | 64 | 0.578 | 24 | |
14 | Newhaven | 28 | 7 | 3 | 18 | 39 | 69 | 0.565 | 24 | |
15 | Royal & Sun Alliance | 28 | 4 | 6 | 18 | 26 | 76 | 0.342 | 18 | Left the League |
Source: Non-League Matters
Rules for classification: 1) points; 2) goal difference; 3) number of goals scored.
The points system: 3 points for a win, 1 point for a draw and 0 points for losing.
Rules for classification: 1) points; 2) goal difference; 3) number of goals scored.
The points system: 3 points for a win, 1 point for a draw and 0 points for losing.
References
- "Sussex County Football League 1993–2003". Non League Matters.
- "SCFL Historic League Tables". Southern Combination Football League. Archived from the original on 2019-01-19. Retrieved 2019-02-05.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.