Nantucket's neutrality during the American Revolutionary War

Nantucket is an island located 14 miles (20 km) south of Cape Cod in the State of Massachusetts. When the British explorer Bartholomew Gosnold first sighted Nantucket in 1602 on his way to the New World, it was already home to some 3,000 indigenous Native Americans who were living there.[1] The island was then ceded to British settler Thomas Mayhew in 1641. Upon receiving this land, Mayhew kept 1/10th for himself, and sold the remaining land to British settlers living in Salisbury for the infamous sum of "thirty pounds…and also two beaver hats, one for myself, and one for my wife."[2] Among other reasons, Nantucket is significant in the history of early colonial America for the success of its whaling industry and because it remained neutral during the American Revolutionary War.

Background

The earliest European settlement in the region around Nantucket was a French colony established on Martha's Vineyard, which was erected before Thomas Mayhew was gifted the island in 1641. The land-grab that occurred after Mr. Mayhew sold 9/10ths of his land at bargain price resulted in a rapid settlement of the island from places like Massachusetts and New Hampshire.[1] These new residents, in an attempt to carve out success for themselves in a land supposedly filled with "opportunity," began to explore new agricultural and commercial industries.[1]

A woodcut engraving from 1811, created by Benjamin Tanner, to depict the southern view of the port of Nantucket

Early economy

Chief among these new industries was whaling. The Nantucket Historical Association notes that inhabitants of the island may have seen right whales washing ashore on their beaches as early as the 1690s, and it is confirmed that by 1715, Nantucketers must have learned there were sperm whales in those waters as well.[1] There was high demand for quality oils within the colonies and in Europe, but particularly in London, which was by far the most industrialized European city at the time.[3]:182 Recognizing their fortunate geographic location and in need of a good living, large numbers of these early settlers began to hunt sperm whales by the early 1700s. Herman Melville wrote in Moby Dick that "thus have these Nantucketers overrun and conquered the watery world like so many Alexanders."[4] By the time the American Revolution began in 1775, the island had become the premier whaling economy on the Eastern Seaboard and had developed into a crucial trade partner for the British Empire across the Atlantic.[3]

A sketch of the Siasconset whaling station in 1775

Demand and spermaceti oils

London had experienced the effects of industrialization during the beginning of the century, and they experienced both the good and the bad of the urbanization and modernization that came with it. A rise in crime rates in London was blamed in part on the city's widespread lack of street lights, which soon became chief among the concerns and prompted the creation of a program to counteract that issue in 1736.[3]:179-185 Gerald S. Graham wrote in "The Migrations of the Nantucket Whale Fishery: An Episode in British Colonial Policy" (New England Quarterly 8.1, 1935) that at the time, London held spermaceti oils and their lubricant byproducts in high-regard, as they was odorless, gave the "clearest and brightest flame," and were of comparable price with vegetable oils.[3]:180 Various ancillary industries on Nantucket such as shipbuilding and spermaceti processing also emerged to support the growth of this new burgeoning island economy.

An example of typical Quaker attire in the 17th century

Background on early society and politics

Inhabitants of early Nantucket were largely drawn to the island from the surrounding rural areas of New England, even though until 1692 the lands were still part Dukes Country in New York State. Due to the island's Wampanoag origin, it developed a liberal and accepting social culture, which prompted a large influx of Quakers who were seeking to escape religious persecution from the British. "The History of Nantucket," an article in the Christian Register and Boston Observer written on December 28, 1839, stated that "the persecution of the Quakers let to the settlement of this island."[5] Known collectively as the Society of Friends, these Quakers became some of Nantucket's most influential founding families and more often than not brought their cultural majority to bear in local politics.[1]

The situation in early 1775

In 1993, Nathaniel Philbrick penned a scholarly article for an edition of The New England Quarterly (66, no. 3, pp. 434–437) titled 'Every Wave is a Fortune: Nantucket Island and the Making of an American Icon.'[6]:434–447 In it, he wrote that "during the winter and spring of 1775, as Britain and her colonies teetered on the brink of war, Nantucket Island was mentioned repeatedly in the halls of Parliament."[6]:434 While there is some inherent 'puffery' there, it is undeniable that Britain valued Nantucket's whaling exports at high-value, and demonstrated this in excess when it came time to make decisions about whether or not to prepare for the Revolutionary War. This is evident in the Massachusetts Bay Restraining Bill of 1774, where Nantucket was infamously exempted from a bill that prohibited trade out of Boston and banned the use of fisheries on the East Coast and in Newfoundland.[7]:272 This was reinforced by another House of Commons bill banning fisheries that passed by a 261/65 margin on February 10, 1775, that again purposefully exempted Nantucket because the island's whaling industry's was a sizable colonial asset for the British economy.[3]:182-183 As for the reason, one needs to look no further than a report compiled by Thomas Jefferson in 1775, which stated that in that year alone, Nantucket boasted half of Massachusetts' total whaling vessels (150 of 304), contained half of the seamen manning those vessels (2025 of 4059), and had the production capacity to collect and churn out over 30,000 barrels of oil in a single calendar year.[8] As Lydia S. Hinchman and Lydia S. Hitchman wrote in a piece for the Bulletin of Friends' Historical Society of Philadelphia (Vol. I, No. II, February 1907), to truly "understand the situation perfectly, one must go back to the latter part of the 17th century and follow closely the history of fishing interests of Nantucket, and consider the building up of a business which would have been ruined if the islanders a century later had boldly taken sides with the Colonists."[8]

A narrative sketch of the Citizen ship wreck, a good example of whaling in the early colonial era

The economic predicament of neutrality

Captain Robert Barclay-Allardyce (1779 - 1854), from the National Gallery of Scotland Commons

Nantucket was caught precariously in the middle of two opposing forces when tensions flared in 1775. On the one hand, they were an important part of the Massachusetts Bay Colony, and were valued by the colonists who lived there. As such, the islanders were ever-immersed in a sea of revolutionary activity, and answered to a state government that had for the major part of the past year been governed by a distinct form of colonial martial law. This was a dangerous proposition, as Nantucket had no defense system of any kind, no standing army, and no barracks; and even worse they were hopelessly geographically isolated, adrift from the Massachusetts coast. They could have been easily overtaken or occupied by the Colonists or British if they proclaimed loyalty to either side. Moreover, another aspect to consider is that the livelihood of local inhabitants was entirely dependent on the oil trade with London. Alexander Starbuck noted in a July 1874 edition of the New England Historical and Genealogical Register that the success of the island's commercial ventures in 1775, which at that time included professions such as "merchants, blacksmiths, coopers, boat-builders, riggers, sailmakers, oil and candle manufacturers, carpenters, seamen, and similar intertwining occupations," was entirely predicated on the continued sale of expensive whale products to the wealthy consumer base that lay across the Atlantic Ocean.[7]:272 These British merchants, recognizing the delicate nature of this arrangement, acted quickly to protect their cash-cow on the Eastern Seaboard. Quaker sympathizer and Scottish merchant, Robert Barclay, testified before Parliament as early as 1774 that Nantucket's supply of spermaceti oil was crucial for London's economy, and that neutrality might be a plausible option given that the majority of trade the island had conducted in the past bypassed the now traitors in Boston and was conducted directly with the mother country.[6]:434

Cultural factors

While joining the American Revolution would have certainly had negative consequences for the local whaling industry, economic considerations weren't the only factors at play in 1775. In particular, the spirit of Quakerism also played a significant role in Nantucket's decision to adopt a policy of neutrality. The Society of Friends, which was a Quaker organization made up of families such as the Macys, Coffins, Gardners, and Starbucks, presided over local politics with a pacific character, and "entertained a strong and almost universal opinion that wars are wrong."[5]

The qualifications and descriptions of Quakerism

Hinchman and Hitchman reinforced this fact in their article 'William Rotch and the Neutrality of Nantucket during the Revolutionary War,' where they write that "a powerful factor in their [the Quakers'] non-partisanship or neutrality was the spirit of non-resistance fostered by Quakerism, the prevailing religion on the Island at that time."[8] An article on the 'History of Nantucket' from an 1839 edition of the Christian Register and Boston Observer noted, similarly, that the Quakers' "well-known aversion to war has proved a far better shield to them than fleets and fortifications could have been," as they were "exposed on all sides, without a single fort, arsenal, or military company."[5]

Outbreak of war on April 19th, 1775

By the summer of 1775, Nantucket was feeling pressure from both the colonies and British Empire. On July 7, 1775, the Provincial Congress in Philadelphia passed a resolution stating "that no provisions or necessaries of any kind be exported from any part of this colony to the Island of Nantucket until the inhabitants of said Island shall have given full and sufficient satisfaction to this Congress, or some future House of Representatives, that the provisions they have now by them, has not been and shall not be expended in foreign, but for domestic production."[7]:272-276 A clear statement to cease trade with the British, this proclamation from the domestic powers at be was met with an immediate response from the settlers of Nantucket, who outlined their commitment to neutrality - on both moral and cultural grounds - in a letter from six selectmen to the Board of Massachusetts on July 14, 1775. Following the incidents in Concord and Lexington, this letter explained how "the inhabitants are the greater part, of the people call'd Quakers, whose well known principles of Religion, will not admit of their taking up arms in a military way in any case whatever."[7]:272-278 However, the 5,000 inhabitants of Nantucket also had some selfish motivations, chief among them the wealth and prosperity that the whaling trade had afforded the island's most prominent merchants and traders.[9] As George Rogers Taylor wrote in 'Nantucket Oil Merchants & The American Revolution" for The Massachusetts Review, "When the sting came during and following the war, the Nantucket oil magnates demonstrated how little their attachment to a new nation or affection for their island home counted against prospective gain from hunting and processing the whale."[9] Thus, it appears a tentative neutrality was established, where both sides were skeptical of the island's loyalty, as were Nantucketers for a time skeptical of the best course towards sustained trade and shelter from physical harm.

Loose establishment of neutrality, 1776-1782

After Nantucket's dominance came to an end, New Bedford was a prominent whaling hub on the Massachusetts coast

By 1776, although the economic and social elites on Nantucket had demonstrated their commitment to neutrality in both their actions and their letters in response to those sent accusatorially by the Provincial Congress, there was still light pressure to act from powers on both sides of the war.[7]:272-276 Because many of Nantucket's important Quaker families moved off the island once the war began, there was an immediate pressure to reinforce ties with the British Empire over the whale trade, and in response, a committee of Benjamin Tucker, Timothy Folger, William Rotch, and Samuel Starbuck was immediately sent to New York City to parlay with the British so that trade could continue as planned.[8] The desire of these elites to safeguard their business investment was evident in Nantucket's actions during the early-war period, such as in December 1778, when the British schooner The Hammond wrecked on the Nantucket coastline and Timothy Folger outfitted the shipwrecked British forces with small vessels and provisions in order to get them safely to New York.[9]:591 The British also seemed all too eager to protect their economic allies on the island during this time. A primary source reading of a local girl's diary, Keziah Fanning, reveals that on April 5, 1779 loyalists forces came to Nantucket with orders not to harm or uproot local citizens, but to "destroy rebel property wherever it be found."[9]:586

The rebel reaction and Nantucket's response

Inevitably, this caused some pushback from Colonist forces over the exact parameters of neutrality. Perhaps adding insult to injury is the contention of some modern-day scholars, who theorize that Nantucket continued to trade with the British even after their declaration of neutrality.[10] As a result, on September 25, 1782 a town meeting was held on Nantucket and a letter (signed by Frederick Folger, the Town Clerk) was sent to the Court of Massachusetts that officially explained the island's stance and outlined, once again, their desire to remain neutral during the war.[8] Furthermore, the letter attacked rumors that Nantucket had continued to trade secretly with New York City. In the following weeks, William Rotch and Samuel Starbuck were sent as envoys to Philadelphia, where in the winter of 1782 an official Agreement of Neutrality was drafted, signed, and made law.[8] As one scholar noted, "Nantucket struggled through the war and experienced considerable prosperity after the proclamation of peace."[8]

Prominent individuals

An 8x10 print of William Rotch by E.D. Merchant from the Nantucket Historical Association, dated 1825

William Rotch

Of all the individuals on Nantucket during the situation in 1775, few had more influence on local affairs than William Rotch (1734-1828). Rotch was born on the island in 1734, and had inherited considerable wealth from his father. This inheritance, which Rotch split with his brother Francis, included two major shipping vessels, the Bedford and the Dartmouth - the latter is famous for being the ship from which a considerable wealth of tea was flung during the Boston Tea Party in 1773.[8]

Timothy Folger

Timothy Folger was a prominent businessman on Nantucket during the Revolutionary War period and was the member of one of Massachusetts' most successful early American families. He was a successful business man, a captain, and a member of the groups that were sent to New York City and Philadelphia to discuss neutrality during the war. Folger was a three-time representative to both Massachusetts and New York from 1779-1782.[11]

Legacy and scholarship

Nantucket's decision to exercise its free will and remain neutral during the Revolutionary War made it one of the poster boys for early American exceptionalism, while at the same time the success of the island's whaling industry exemplified the idea that the "American Dream" was attainable for colonists attempting to carve out personal fortunes in the New World. This legacy is inculcated by the famous French explorer St. John de Crevecoeur, who visited Nantucket in the early 1770s and mentioned it repeatedly in his 1782 book Letters to an American Farmer, writing of the economic success that "what has happened here has and will happen everywhere else."[6]:435-437 It is also referenced in Thomas Jefferson's 1788 book Observations on the Whale-Fishery, which he wrote as Minister to France following the conclusion of the Revolutionary War in 1783, and which describes in detail the success of "Nantuckois" in the service of Britain's whaling industry during the decades after the war.[6]:435-437 Today, the island is regarded for economic success in tourism, but within the architecture and history of the town there are echoes of a substantial whaling prosperity that occurred long ago.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 "Brief history of Nantucket". Nantucket Historical Association. Retrieved November 28, 2016.
  2. ↑ Worth, Henry (1901). "Nantucket Lands and Landowners". Nantucket Historical Association. 2 (1): 53–82.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 Graham, Gerald S. (1935). "The Migrations of the Nantucket Whale Fishery: An Episode in British Colonial Policy". New England Quarterly. 8.1 – via ProQuest.
  4. ↑ Melville, Herman (1922). Moby Dick. London: Constable & Company. p. 55 – via Colby College Libraries. Thus have these Nantucketers overrun and conquered the watery world like so many Alexanders
  5. 1 2 3 "History of Nantucket". Christian Register and Boston Observer (1835-1843). 1. December 28, 1839.
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 Philbrick, Nathaniel (1993). "Every Wave Is a Fortune: Nantucket Island and the Making of an American Icon". The New England Quarterly. 66 (3). doi:10.2307/366005.
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 Starbuck, Alexander (July 1874). "Nantucket in the Revolution". The New-England Historical and Genealogical Register (1874-1905). 1.
  8. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Hitchman, Lydia S. (February 1907). "William Rotch and the Neutrality of Nantucket during the Revolutionary War". Bulletin of Friends' Historical Society of Philadelphia. 1 (2): 49–55.
  9. 1 2 3 4 Taylor, George Rogers (1977). "Nantucket Oil Merchants & the American Revolution". The Massachusetts Review. 18 (3.): 581–606.
  10. ↑ A reference to the general tone of George Roger Taylor's argument in the JSTOR article 'Nantucket Oil Merchants & the American Revolution' for The Massachusetts Review, which casts doubt on the honest behavior of Nantucket's residents during the initial period of neutrality.
  11. ↑ Taylor, George Rogers, pp. 590-594, including graphs in the article which detail how Timothy Folger - a dominant merchant at the time - was a three-year representative to NY and Boston during the beginning of the war

Bibliography

  • Elizabeth Oldham. "A Brief History of Nantucket." The Nantucket Historical Association Website. http://nha.org/library/faq/briefhistory.html
  • George Rogers Taylor. "Nantucket Oil Merchants & the American Revolution." The Massachusetts Review, vol. 18, no. 3, 1977, pp. 581–606. www.jstor.org/stable/25088773
  • Gerald S. Graham. "The Migrations of the Nantucket Whale Fishery: An Episode in British Colonial Policy." New England Quarterly 8.1 (1935): 179. ProQuest. Web. 2 November 2016.
  • Unknown Author. "History of Nantucket." Christian Register and Boston Observer (1835-1843) Dec 28 1839: 1. ProQuest. Web. 1 November 2016.
  • Lydia S. Hinchman and Lydia S. Hitchman, "William Rotch and the Neutrality of Nantucket during the Revolutionary War." Bulletin of Friends' Historical Society of Philadelphia, Vol. 1, No. 2 (Second Month (February), 1907), pp. 49–55.
  • Nathaniel Philbrick. "Every Wave Is a Fortune: Nantucket Island and the Making of an American Icon." The New England Quarterly 66, no. 3 (1993): 434-47.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.