Local hiring

Local hiring is a goal or requirement to hire people who live close to the place of work. This aim is often more specifically structured as a requirement for contractors awarded certain types of publicly funded projects to recruit a certain proportion of the people working on the project from a particular area.

Proponents of local hiring ordinances claim the practice:

  • ensures that tax dollars are invested back into the local economy
  • reduces the environmental impact of commuting
  • fosters community involvement
  • preserves local employment opportunities in construction

Opponents of local hiring ordinances point to economic factors and public policy arguments:

  • a restricted pool of labor will result in higher costs
  • constraints of local hire will drive prices up, as contractors will factor in compliance costs and/or choose to not bid
  • municipal cost of oversight detracts from public benefit
  • the extent to which local hiring provides opportunities for local workers may also restrict opportunities for other local workers outside of their local catchment area

The environmental benefit of local hiring comes principally because employing a greater percentage of local workers leads to shorter commutes and a greater ability to walk, bike, and take public transit to work. This results in reductions in air pollution, including greenhouse gases.

Local hiring is an aspect of the relocalization movement. Mandating that contractors hire locally means residents can work closer to home, spending less time traveling to and from their jobs. As Robert D. Putnam notes in Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community, each additional ten minutes spent commuting leads to a ten percent decline in all areas of civic engagement.[1] Therefore, local hiring may be one tool municipalities can use to increase community involvement. The other positive aspects that comes with local hiring is the fact that the people who shall be hired have great knowledge of the local culture and are more experienced on the business practices of the local area. this is an implication that it will be easy to conduct business locally.[2]

The City and County of San Francisco Board of Supervisors passed the strongest local hiring ordinance in the United States on December 14, 2010.[3] This legislation, sponsored by Supervisor John Avalos, requires 20% of construction workers on city projects in 2011-12 to live locally, rising to 50% by 2017. 50% of apprentices on these projects must live locally. The ordinance has per-trade requirements set at half the overall level (e.g. by 2017, 25% of workers in any trade must live locally). The local hire requirement replaced a previous goal-based approach that had proved ineffective, with only 20% of hours on city project being worked by San Francisco residents in the period July 2009 to late 2010. The new ordinance became law on March 25, 2011.[4]


References

  1. ↑ Putnam, Robert D., Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community, New York: Simon & Schuster, p. 544, ISBN 978-0-7432-0304-3
  2. ↑ Gholipoor, Mahmoud; Rashidinejad, Safoora (2015). "ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF USING FOREIGN MANAGERS IN IRAN OIL INTERNATIONAL PROJECTS" (PDF). International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET). 2 (5): 923-935. Retrieved 6 October 2018.
  3. ↑ Upton, John. "SF Adopts Local Hiring Law". The Bay Citizen. Retrieved 2011-08-11.
  4. ↑ "San Francisco Local Hiring Policy for Construction" (PDF). San Francisco Board of Supervisors. Retrieved 2011-04-14.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.