George Chapman (murderer)

George Chapman
Illustration of George Chapman
Born Seweryn Antonowicz Kłosowski
(1865-12-14)14 December 1865
Nagórna, Congress Poland
Died 7 April 1903(1903-04-07) (aged 37)
HM Prison Wandsworth, London, England
Cause of death Hanging
Other names Ludwig Schloski
Criminal penalty Death
Details
Victims 3
Span of crimes
1897–1902
Country England
Date apprehended
1903

George Chapman (14 December 1865 – 7 April 1903), born Seweryn Antonowicz Kłosowski and also known as Ludwig Schloski, was a Polish serial killer known as the Borough Poisoner. Born in Congress Poland, he moved to England as an adult, where he committed his crimes. Chapman was convicted and executed after poisoning three women, but is remembered today mostly because some contemporary police officers suspected him of being the notorious serial killer Jack the Ripper.

Early life

George Chapman was born in the village of Nagórna (now part of Koło) in the Warsaw Governorate of Congress Poland, to Antonio and Emile Klosowski. His father was a carpenter.[1][2] According to a certificate found in his personal effects after his arrest, he was apprenticed at age 14 to a senior surgeon, Moshko (Mosze) Rappaport, in Zwoleń, whom he assisted in procedures such as the application of leeches for blood-letting.[2] He then enrolled on a course in practical surgery at the Warsaw Praga Hospital.[2] This course was very brief, lasting from October 1885 to January 1886 (attested to by another certificate in his possession) but Chapman continued to serve as a nurse, or doctor's assistant in Warsaw until December 1886.[2]

Chapman later left Poland for Britain, settling in London, though the time he arrived in the capital has never been reliably ascertained. A receipt for hospital fees from February 1887 indicating that Chapman was still there is the last record of him in Poland, and papers documenting his early life end abruptly at that month, indicating that he potentially left Poland at around that time.[1] Witness testimony at his trial seems to indicate that he emigrated to London in 1888.[3] He settled in the East End and began working as a hairdresser's assistant in either late 1887 or early 1888, with records indicating that he worked for an Abraham Radin of 70 West India Dock Road. He stopped working there after five months, and he subsequently opened a barbershop at 126 Cable Street, St George in the East. This was also listed as his residence in an 1889 London directory. It is likely that this was his residence during the Jack the Ripper murders in the fall of 1888.

Chapman married a young Polish girl, Lucie Badewski, in 1889, and had two children with her, and because of this was soon confronted by his original Polish wife.[3] The couple moved around different residences in London before moving to the United States in 1891. The last census record of them in London is from April of that year. The couple settled in Jersey City, New Jersey, where Chapman found work in a barbershop, but often fought bitterly. In February 1892, after Chapman had attacked Lucie while she was pregnant and later told her he had intended to kill her and cover up her murder, she returned to London, where she moved in with her sister and gave birth to a daughter. Chapman himself eventually returned to London, and the two reunited for a while before ending their relationship permanently. In 1893, while working as an assistant in Haddin's hairdresser shop, he met a woman named Annie Chapman (no known relation to the Ripper victim). They began a relationship and moved in together. In 1894, after almost a year of cohabiting, Chapman brought another woman to live with them, and Annie, who was pregnant, left a few weeks later. In early 1895, Annie told Chapman about their baby, but he offered no support. That same year, he became an assistant in William Wenzel's barbershop at 7 Church Lane, Leytonstone, while lodging at the house of John Ward in Forest Road.[1]

Crimes and execution

Chapman took at least four mistresses, who posed as his wife; he killed three by poisoning.[4] They were Mary Isabella Spink (1858 - 25 December 1897),[5] Bessie Taylor (died 14 February 1901)[5] and Maud Marsh (died 22 October 1902).[6] He administered the compound tartar-emetic to each of them, having purchased it from a chemist in Hastings, Sussex.[7] Rich in the metallic element antimony, tartar-emetic can, if used improperly, cause painful death with symptoms similar to arsenic poisoning.[7]

Chapman had met Spink while working at Wenzel's barbershop. Spink, an alcoholic whose husband had left her and taken their son, joined him in a fake marriage and left him a legacy of £500. They began living together and leased a barbershop in a poor section of Hastings. This business was unsuccessful, and they moved their shop to a more prosperous location and began offering "musical shaves", in which Spink played the piano while Chapman serviced the customers. This proved popular, and gave the couple a sizable income. Chapman eventually purchased his own sailboat, which he named the Mosquito. However, Chapman repeatedly subjected Spink to brutal beatings. A woman who lived in the same building claimed to have often heard Spink crying out in the night, and to have noticed abrasions and bruises on her face and marks on her throat. On April 3, 1897, Chapman purchased a one-ounce dose of tartar-emetic from the shop of William Davidson, a chemist in High Street.[1]

Their barbershop eventually failed, and Chapman resorted to managing a pub in Bartholomew Square. It was there that he fatally poisoned Spink. Soon afterward, he hired Taylor, who had been a restaurant manager, to work at his pub, and they entered into a relationship. Chapman again became abusive, reportedly shouting at her and at one point threatening her with a revolver. After she began coming down with the same symptoms that Spink had shown, Chapman left London with her to avoid controversy, moving to the market town of Bishop's Stortford, Hertfordshire, where he ran The Grapes Pub. After an operation, Taylor's condition remained poor, and they returned to London, where he leased the Monument Tavern. Taylor's condition grew steadily worse, and she died in 1901. Chapman also attempted to commit arson on the Monument Tavern, which was quickly losing it's lease. In August 1901, he hired Marsh as a barmaid for the Monument Tavern. He again entered into a false marriage with her, and was physically abusive to her. She was also eventually poisoned to death.[1]

Suspicions surrounding Marsh's death led to a police investigation. It was found that she had been poisoned, as had the other two women, whose bodies were exhumed.[6] An indictment for murder could contain only one count and Chapman was therefore charged only with the murder of Marsh. He was prosecuted by Sir Archibald Bodkin and the solicitor-general, Sir Edward Carson, convicted on 19 March 1903 and hanged at Wandsworth Prison on 7 April 1903.[6] Immediately following Chapman's death, his widow Lucie Kłosowski married Frank Szymanski in April 1903. Chapman's motives for these murders are unclear. While Spink had left him a legacy of £500, he gained nothing from the other two victims.[8]

Jack the Ripper suspect

George Chapman

One of the detectives at Scotland Yard, Frederick Abberline, is reported to have told George Godley, the policeman who arrested Chapman: "You've got Jack the Ripper at last!"[9] In two 1903 interviews with the Pall Mall Gazette, Abberline spelled out his suspicions, referring to Chapman by name.[10] Abberline thought Chapman was the Ripper because during the original investigation, he had closely interviewed Chapman's first "wife", Lucie Badewski, and she had told him that her husband often used to go out during the night for hours on end.[3] Speculation in contemporary newspaper accounts and books has led to Chapman, like fellow serial killer Thomas Neill Cream, becoming one of many suspects in the infamous Ripper murders. As far as is known, Chapman was not a suspect at the time of the murders. Chapman was a later surname borrowed in 1895 from one of his mistresses whom he did not poison — (Sarah) Annie Chapman (not to be confused with the Ripper victim of the same name).[11]

Recent writers are divided about whether Chapman should be regarded as a serious Ripper suspect. Philip Sugden considered that Chapman is the most likely candidate among known Ripper suspects, but that the case against him is far from proven.[12] However, John Eddleston rated Chapman at only 2 ("a remote possibility") on his 0 to 5 rating of Ripper suspects.[13] Paul Begg only dealt with Chapman briefly, and evidently did not regard him as a serious suspect.[14]

The case against Chapman rests mainly on the point that he undoubtedly was a violent man with a misogynistic streak. He was known to beat his common-law-wives and was prone to other violent behaviour. While living in the US, Chapman allegedly forced his wife, Lucy Klosowska, down on their bed and began to strangle her, only stopping to attend to a customer who walked into the shop which adjoined their room. When he left, she was said to have found a knife under the pillow. He reportedly later told her that he had planned to behead her, even pointing out the spot where he would have buried her and reciting what he would have said to their neighbours.[15]

Chapman had arrived at Whitechapel roughly around the time the first murder took place.[3] His description matched the man seen with Mary Jane Kelly (the fifth victim of the "canonical five") and the murders stopped when he left for the US.[3] It has even been suggested that he carried out a Ripper-style killing in New York City, the murder of Carrie Brown,[12] but recent research suggests he did not reach the US until after this murder.[16]

However, there is a lack of any hard evidence that would link Chapman to the Ripper murders. The main argument against treating him as a serious Ripper suspect is that it would be unusual for a serial killer to change his method of killing, from mutilation to poisoning, although some authorities have cast doubt on whether this is as unusual as is supposed.[14] There is also some doubt about whether he could speak English at the time, as the Ripper would have almost certainly had to according to eyewitness reports about the suspect holding conversations with some of his victims, and whether as a recent immigrant he would have had the intimate knowledge of the Whitechapel district that the Ripper seems to have had.[3][13] The Ripper appears to have selected victims who were previously unknown to him, while Chapman killed acquaintances, and although Chapman did live in Whitechapel it was not particularly near the scene of the murders.[13]

Chapman's story was dramatised twice by Towers of London. Firstly in 1949 in Secrets of Scotland Yard as George Chapman... Poisoner, Publican and Lady Killer and then again in a 1951 episode of The Black Museum entitled "The Straight Razor". Both conclude with a brief argument for Chapman's identity as Jack the Ripper.

See also

References

Citations

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 "Casebook: Jack the Ripper - George Chapman".
  2. 1 2 3 4 Sugden (2002), p. 441.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 de Loriol (2010), pp. 61–2.
  4. Sugden (2002), p. 458.
  5. 1 2 Sugden (2002), p. 445.
  6. 1 2 3 Sugden (2002), p. 447.
  7. 1 2 Sugden (2002), p. 444.
  8. Sugden (2002), p. 462.
  9. Sugden (2002), p. 439.
  10. Sugden (2002), pp. 440—441.
  11. Sugden (2002), p. 443.
  12. 1 2 Sugden (2002), p. 465.
  13. 1 2 3 Eddleston (2001).
  14. 1 2 Begg (2013).
  15. Sugden (2002), pp. 449—50.
  16. Vanderlinden & Hacker (2004), Part 3: The New York Affair.

Sources

  • Begg, Paul (2013). Jack the Ripper: The Facts. Pavilion Books. p. 300. ISBN 978-1-909-39615-9.
  • Eddleston, John J. (2001). Jack the Ripper: An Encyclopedia. ABC-CLIO. p. 304. ISBN 978-1-576-07414-5.
  • de Loriol, Peter (2010). Murder and Crime – London. History Press Limited. p. 95. ISBN 978-0-752-45657-7.
  • Sugden, Philip (2002). The Complete History of Jack the Ripper. Carroll & Graf. p. 532. ISBN 978-0-786-70932-8.
  • Vanderlinden, Wolf; Hacker, John (2004). Ripper Notes: America Looks at Jack the Ripper, Issue 19. Inklings Press. p. 109. ISBN 978-0-975-91290-4.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.