Endrew F. v. Douglas County School Dist. RE–1
Endrew F. v. Douglas County School Dist. RE–1 | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Argued January 11, 2017 Decided March 22, 2017 | |
Full case name | Endrew F., a minor, by and through his parents and next friends, Joseph F. et al. v. Douglas County School District RE-1 |
Docket nos. | 15–827 |
Citations | 580 U.S. ___ (more) |
Prior history |
|
Procedural history | On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit |
Holding | |
To meet its substantive obligation under the IDEA, a school must offer an IEP reasonably calculated to enable a child to make progress appropriate in light of the child’s circumstances. United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit vacated and remanded. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Roberts, joined by unanimous |
Laws applied | |
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. §§ 1400 et seq. |
Endrew F. v. Douglas County School Dist. RE–1, 580 U.S. ___ (2017), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that, under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act ("IDEA"),[1] schools must provide students an education that is "reasonably calculated to enable a child to make progress appropriate in light of the child’s circumstances."[2] In a unanimous opinion written by Chief Justice John Roberts, the Court vacated the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit and held that the proper standard under the IDEA "is markedly more demanding than the 'merely more than de minimis' test applied by the Tenth Circuit."[3]
See also
References
The citations in this article are written in Bluebook style. Please see the talk page for more information.