Advertising network

An online advertising network or ad network is a company that connects advertisers to websites that want to host advertisements. The key function of an ad network is an aggregation of ad supply from publishers and matching it with advertiser's demand. The phrase "ad network" by itself is media-neutral in the sense that there can be a "Television Ad Network" or a "Print Ad Network", but is increasingly used to mean "online ad network" as the effect of aggregation of publisher ad space and sale to advertisers is most commonly seen in the online space. The fundamental difference between traditional media ad networks and online ad networks is that online ad networks use a central ad server to deliver advertisements to consumers, which enables targeting, tracking and reporting of impressions in ways not possible with analog media alternatives.

Overview

The advertising network market is a large and growing market, with Internet advertising revenues expected to grow from $135.42 bn in 2014 to $239.87 bn in 2019.[1] Digital advertising revenues in the United States alone are set to reach $107.30 bn in 2018 which is a 18.7% increase from 2017 ad spend. [2] This growth will result in many new players in the market and encourage acquisitions of ad networks by larger companies that either enter the market or expand their market presence. Currently, there are hundreds of ad networks worldwide and the landscape changes daily.

The inventory of online advertising space comes in many different forms, including space on the desktop and mobile websites, in RSS feeds, on blogs, in instant messaging applications, mobile apps, adware, e-mails, and on other media. The dominant forms of inventory include third-party content websites, who work with advertising networks for either a share of the ad revenues or a fee, as well as search engines, mobile, and online video resources.[1]

An advertiser can buy a run of network package, or a run of category package within the network. The advertising network serves advertisements from its central ad server, which responds to a site once a page is called. A snippet of code is called from the ad server, that represents the advertising banner.

Large publishers often sell only their remnant inventory through ad networks. Typical numbers range from 10% to 60% of total inventory being remnant and sold through advertising networks.

Smaller publishers often sell all of their inventory through ad networks. One type of ad network, known as a blind network, is such that advertisers place ads, but do not know the exact places where their ads are being placed.

Large ad networks include a mixture of search engines, media companies, and technology vendors.[3]

Types

There are several criteria for categorizing advertising networks. In particular, the company's business strategy, as well as the quality of the networks' traffic and volume of inventory can serve as bases for categorization.

Based on business strategy

Online advertising networks can be divided into three groups based on how they work with advertisers and publishers:

  1. Vertical networks: They represent the publications in their portfolio, with full transparency for the advertiser about where their ads will run.[4] They typically promote high quality traffic at market prices and are heavily used by brand marketers. The economic model is generally revenue share. Vertical Networks offer ROS (Run-Of-Site) advertising across specific Channels (example: Auto or Travel) or they offer site-wide advertising options, in which case they operate in a similar fashion to Publisher Representation firms.
  2. Blind networks: These companies offer good pricing to direct marketers in exchange for those marketers relinquishing control over where their ads will run, though some networks offer a "site opt out" method. The network usually runs campaigns as RON or Run-Of-Network. Blind networks achieve their low pricing through large bulk buys of typically remnant inventory combined with conversion optimization and ad targeting technology.
  3. Targeted networks: Sometimes called "next generation" or "2.0" ad networks, these focus on specific targeting technologies such as behavioral or contextual, that have been built into an ad server. Targeted networks specialize in using consumer clickstream data to enhance the value of the inventory they purchase.[5] Further specialized targeted networks include social graph technologies which attempt to enhance the value of inventory using connections in social networks.[6]

Based on number of clients and traffic quality

Ad networks can also be divided into first-tier and second-tier networks. First-tier advertising networks have a large number of their own advertisers and publishers, they have high quality traffic, and they serve ads and traffic to second-tier networks. Examples of first-tier networks include the major search engines. Second-tier advertising networks may have some of their own advertisers and publishers, but their main source of revenue comes from syndicating ads from other advertising networks.

While it is common for websites to be categorized into tiers, these can be misleading. While Google is in the clear majority of advertisement impression served, other networks that could be labeled as tier 2 actually dominate over these tier 1 ad networks as far as the number of customers reached...

Mobile and video ad networks

Ad networks often support a wide spectrum of ad formats (e.g. banners, native ads) and platforms (e.g. display, mobile, video). This is true for most ad networks. However, there also are ad networks that focus on particular kinds of inventory and ads:

  1. Mobile ad networks, focus on the traffic generated via mobile web and mobile apps, and work with the corresponding ad formats.
  2. Video ad networks serve ads via inventory, associated with online video content.

Video and mobile ad networks can be acquired by larger advertising companies, or operate as standalone entities.

Issues

  1. Positioning: Most ad networks don't disclose impressions per site. This means that advertisers or media agencies aren't sure where their ads will run. This can be a dangerous proposition if your ad turns up in website that you don’t want to be associated with.
  2. Malware: Some ad networks have been implicated in aiding the distribution of malware due to allowing malicious advertisers to buy inventory across their partner sites without enough scrutiny.
  3. Price transparency: Let's examine a scenario. An ad network packages display inventory to an agency at say $10 CPM (cost per mille – or cost per thousand impressions). The ad network would then buy a very small portion of the inventory on premium publications at $50 CPM and a large portion of the long tail inventory at $2 CPM. The real eCPM (effective CPM) of the campaign for the ad network is around $2.50, and is far from the agency’s claim of premium inventory. The marketer is however appeased with screen grabs of his ads appearing in premium positions, oblivious of the masquerade while the ad network walks away with a big margin.
  4. Ad relevance: More often than not, the ads were out of relevance with the website content as a fall out of point 1, and also because there weren’t intelligent contextual engines built into the ad servers (the server system that churns out the ads) of these ad networks.

Online ad networks and advertising publishers

Most online ad-network platforms offer website owners and marketers to signup as advertising publishers. Publishers can then display ads shared by the advertising network and the revenue is shared between both the advertising network and publisher. When the beginners could not pass through the minimum criteria for publishing advertisements, ad placement services could ban the publisher for not fulfilling the requirements. Some networks demand strict terms and conditions while there are other ad publishing alternatives some times commissions vary on what sells otherwise user still to earn a good commission when one matches the criteria, the publisher is allowed to display and share ads provided by the platform to earn a good revenue. Getting approved as a publisher to the best advertising platform is a thorough process. Websites with a clean interface, more traffic and engagements are preferred to be selected as ad network publisher by the advertising platforms.

Notable advertising networks

Network Name Location Founded Status
24/7 Open AdStream [7] New York, NY 1997[8] Active
AdBrite[9] San Francisco[10] 2002[10] Defunct
Adcash [11] Tallinn, Estonia 2007 Active
Atlas Solutions[12] USA 2001 Active
Bing Ads Seattle 2006 Active
Adform[13] Copenhagen, Denmark 2002 Active
AdTaily [14] London, UK[15] 2010[15] Active
Advertising.com [16] Baltimore, Maryland 1998[17] Active
AdWords[18] Ann Arbor, Michigan[19] 2000[20] Active
BlueLithium[21] San Jose, California[22] 2004[22] Defunct[23]
Chitika[24] Westborough, Massachusetts[25] 2003[26] Active
Criteo[27] France[28] 2005 Active
DoubleClick[29] Chicago[30] 1998[30] Active
Baidu Beijing, China 2000 Active
ExoClick Barcelona, Spain 2006 Active
PropellerAds Cyprus 2011 Active
Hydra Network[31] Beverly Hills, California[32] 2003[33] Defunct[34]
Right Media[35] New York[35][36] 2004[37] Active
Rocket Fuel[38] Redwood City, California 2008 Active
ValueClick[39] Westlake Village, California[39] 1998[40] Active
Yahoo! Publisher Network[41] Sunnyvale, California 2005 Defunct
Yashi[42] Toms River, New Jersey 2007 Active
Zedo[43] San Francisco[44] 1999[45] Active

See also

References

  1. 1 2 "Internet advertising: Key insights at a glance". PricewaterhouseCoopers. Retrieved 2015-07-30.
  2. ↑ "Digital Ad Spending Benchmarks by Industry 2018 - eMarketer". eMarketer. Retrieved 2018-07-17.
  3. ↑ mobile ad network AppsDiscover Technologies Pvt Ltd
  4. ↑ Clifford, S. (4-28-2008.). A Web Shift In the Way Advertisers Seek Clicks. New York Times, Retrieved 04/10/10 from LexisNexis database.
  5. ↑ Khan, Imran; Weishaar, Bridget; Karasyov, Vasily; Polinsky, Lev; Boushelle, Joseph (2007-10-11). "The Rise of the Ad Networks: An In-Depth Look Into Ad Networks". J.P. Morgan. Retrieved 2015-12-18.
  6. ↑ David Berkowitz (2009-08-11). "David Berkowitz's Marketing Blog: The Social Graph Ad Targeting Buyer's Guide". Marketers Studio. Retrieved 2014-04-30.
  7. ↑ "247Media.com". Site Info. Alexa. Archived from the original on 2013-08-30. Retrieved 2013-11-08.
  8. ↑ "24/7 Media". 24/7 Media. Retrieved 2013-11-08.
  9. ↑ "AdBrite.com". Site Info. Alexa. Archived from the original on 18 January 2016. Retrieved 9 May 2010.
  10. 1 2 "AdBrite". Company profile. LinkedIn. Retrieved 9 May 2010.
  11. ↑ "Adcash.com". Site Info. Alexa. Retrieved 2016-07-13.
  12. ↑ "Atlassolutions.com Traffic, Demographics and Competitors - Alexa". www.alexa.com. Retrieved 2017-04-07.
  13. ↑ "Adform.com". Site Info. Alexa. Retrieved 22 April 2013.
  14. ↑ "AdTaily". Site Info. Alexa. Retrieved 22 October 2009.
  15. 1 2 "AdTaily". Company profile. CrunchBase. Retrieved 22 October 2009.
  16. ↑ "Advertising.com". Site Info. Alexa. Retrieved August 13, 2015.
  17. ↑ "Advertising.com". Advertising.com. Retrieved August 13, 2015.
  18. ↑ "Google.com". Site Info. Alexa. Retrieved 9 May 2010.
  19. ↑ "Inside Google's Michigan Office". InformationWeek. Archived from the original on 3 May 2008. Retrieved 9 May 2010.
  20. ↑ "Corporate Information". Google. Retrieved 9 May 2010.
  21. ↑ "Bluelithium.com". Site Info. Alexa. Retrieved 9 May 2010.
  22. 1 2 "BlueLithium". Company profile. CrunchBase. Retrieved 9 May 2010.
  23. ↑ "Yahoo Buys BlueLithium, Dreaming of Network Dominance - ClickZ". ClickZ. 2007-09-05. Retrieved 2018-06-13.
  24. ↑ "Chitika.com". Site Info. Alexa. Retrieved 9 May 2010.
  25. ↑ "Chitika contact page". Archived from the original on 27 May 2010. Retrieved 9 May 2010.
  26. ↑ "About Us". The Blog Archive. Chitika. Archived from the original on 27 May 2010. Retrieved 9 May 2010.
  27. ↑ "Criteo.com". Site Info. Alexa. Retrieved 2 Sep 2015.
  28. ↑ "About Us". Criteo. Retrieved 2 Sep 2015.
  29. ↑ "Doubleclick.com". Site Info. Alexa. Retrieved 9 May 2010.
  30. 1 2 "DoubleClick Performics, Inc". Company Information. Businessweek. Retrieved 9 May 2010.
  31. ↑ "Hydranetwork.com". Site Info. Alexa. Retrieved 10 May 2010.
  32. ↑ "About Hydra Group". Hydra. Archived from the original on 25 April 2010. Retrieved 10 May 2010.
  33. ↑ "Press". Hydra. Archived from the original on 27 April 2010. Retrieved 10 May 2010.
  34. ↑ McKeefery, Kevin (June 21, 2010). "Adknowledge acquires affiliate network Hydra Group". DMNews. Retrieved August 11, 2018.
  35. 1 2 "Rightmedia.com". Site Info. Alexa. Retrieved 11 May 2010.
  36. ↑ "Contact Us page". Right Media. Archived from the original on April 9, 2010. Retrieved 11 May 2010.
  37. ↑ "Right Media About Us". Retrieved 11 May 2010.
  38. ↑ "Rocketfuel.com Traffic, Demographics and Competitors - Alexa". www.alexa.com. Retrieved 2017-04-07.
  39. 1 2 "Valueclick.com". Site Info. Alexa. Retrieved 11 May 2010.
  40. ↑ "About Us: Company History, Management, Contact Us". ValueClick. Retrieved 11 May 2010.
  41. ↑ "Yahoo.com". Site Info. Alexa. Retrieved 11 May 2010.
  42. ↑ "Yashi.com". Alexa. Retrieved 11 May 2010.
  43. ↑ "Zedo.com". Site Info. Alexa. Retrieved 11 May 2010.
  44. ↑ "About Us page". Zedo. Retrieved 11 May 2010.
  45. ↑ "Management page". Zedo. Retrieved 13 Jul 2016.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.