< Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European

Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/h₁nómn̥

This Proto-Indo-European entry contains reconstructed words and roots. As such, the term(s) in this entry are not directly attested, but are hypothesized to have existed based on comparative evidence.

Proto-Indo-European

Etymology

Kloekhorst 2008:518 argues for a *-mn̥ derivative of the root *h₃neh₃- (“to name”), reflected in Hittite [script needed] (ḫannai-, “to sue, judge”) (originally "to call to court") and Ancient Greek ὄνομαι (ónomai, “to blame, scold, insult”) (with a semantic shift comparable to English to call names); see also *h₃en(h₂)-.

Within the disputed Indo-Uralic theory, it has been connected with the Uralic root *nime, whence Finnish nimi, Estonian nimi and Hungarian név.

Reconstruction

Sources disagree on the reconstruction of this word. Some reconstruct it with initial *h₃- because of Greek ὄνομα (ónoma), ὄνυμα (ónuma), but the lack of an initial laryngeal in Hittite 𒆷𒀀𒈠𒀭 (lāman) might suggest *h₁ (although the fate of word-initial *h₃ in Anatolian is unclear and controversial), and Armenian անուն (anun) could be from either one. The Greek o- could be due to assimilation to the following o-, just as in ὀδούς (odoús, “tooth”), from *odonts, assimilated from *edonts, from *h₁dont-, although this is now reconstructed with *h₃ by some authorities. Medial *-eh₃- is sometimes reconstructed on the basis of length in some Dutch and Low German denominal verbs, but these are more likely to be late forms using the Germanic a/ō ablaut found also in class VI strong verbs (and in Indo-Iranian it could have arisen by Brugmann's law, and in Latin by the analogy co-gnōscō (“to know”) : cōg-nōmen (“surname”) = nōscō (“to know”) : nōmen, with the other forms from PIE *ǵneh₃-).

The original paradigm is also somewhat difficult to reconstruct precisely; it might be proterokinetic ablauting *h₁nómn̥ ~ *h₁n̥méns, or just acrostatic with or without zero grade in weak cases. The Tocharian forms seem to come from *(h₁)nem-, which could be from the oblique form in an acrostatic paradigm. However, Ronald Kim reconstructs Proto-Tocharian *ñemə as *h₁nḗh₃mn̥.

Alternative reconstructions
  • *h₃néh₃mn̥ ~ *h₃nh₃méns[1][2]
  • *nómn̥ ~ *n̥méns[3]
  • *h₁nḗh₃mn̥ ~ *h₁néh₃mnos[4]
  • *h₁néh₃mn̥
  • *h₃nómn̥

Noun

*h₁nómn̥ n

  1. name
    *h₁nómn̥ dʰéh₁t ― he gave a name

Inflection
Athematic, acrostatic
singular collective
nominative *h₁nómn̥ *h₁némō
genitive *h₁némn̥s *h₁nm̥nés
singular dual plural collective
nominative *h₁nómn̥ *h₁nómnih₁ — *h₁némō
vocative *h₁nómn̥ *h₁nómnih₁ — *h₁némō
accusative *h₁nómn̥ *h₁nómnih₁ — *h₁némō
genitive *h₁némn̥s *? — *h₁nm̥nés
ablative *h₁némn̥s *? — *h₁nm̥nés
dative *h₁némney *? — *h₁nm̥néy
locative *h₁némn̥, *h₁némni *? — *h₁n̥mén, *h₁n̥méni
instrumental *h₁némn̥h₁ *? — *h₁nm̥néh₁

Descendants
  • Albanian: *enmen
  • Anatolian: [Term?]
  • Armenian: *anuwn
    • Old Armenian: անուն (anun), *անումն (*anumn)
      • Armenian: անուն (anun), անում (anum) (dialectal)
  • Balto-Slavic: *inˀmen (see there for further descendants)
  • Celtic: *anman (see there for further descendants)
  • Germanic: *namô (see there for further descendants) (from the collective)
  • Hellenic: [Term?]
    • Ancient Greek: ὄνομα (ónoma), ὄνῠμᾰ (ónuma)
    • Doric: Ἐνυμα-κρατίδας (Enuma-kratídas), Ἐνυμα-ντιάδας (Enuma-ntiádas)
  • Indo-Iranian: *Hnā́ma (see there for further descendants)
  • Italic: *nomən
  • Phrygian: ονομαν (onoman)
  • Tocharian: *ñemə

Further reading
  • Stüber, Karin (1998). The Historical Morphology of n-Stems in Celtic. Maynooth Studies in Celtic Linguistics III. Maynooth: Department of Old Irish, National University of Ireland, pp. 53–59. →ISBN.
  • Kloekhorst, Alwin (2008) Etymological Dictionary of the Hittite Inherited Lexicon (Leiden Indo-European Etymological Dictionary Series; 5), Leiden, Boston: Brill, →ISBN, page 282ff

References
  1. Kloekhorst, Alwin (2008) Etymological Dictionary of the Hittite Inherited Lexicon (Leiden Indo-European Etymological Dictionary Series; 5), Leiden, Boston: Brill, →ISBN, page 599
  2. Beekes, Robert S. P. (2011) Comparative Indo-European Linguistics: An Introduction, revised and corrected by Michiel de Vaan, 2nd edition, Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, page 32
  3. Sihler, Andrew L. (1995) New Comparative Grammar of Greek and Latin, Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, →ISBN, page 97
  4. Ringe, Don (2006) From Proto-Indo-European to Proto-Germanic, Oxford University Press, page 47
This article is issued from Wiktionary. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.