Opinion polling for the 2019 Canadian federal election

This page provides a list of scientific, nationwide public opinion polls that were conducted from the 2015 Canadian federal election leading up to the 2019 Canadian federal election, which was held on October 21. For riding-specific polls see 2019 constituency polls.

National polls

Campaign period

Evolution of voting intentions according to polls conducted during the 2019 Canadian federal election campaign, graphed from the data in the table below. Trendlines are local regressions, with polls weighted by proximity in time and a logarithmic function of sample size. 95% confidence ribbons represent uncertainty about the trendlines, not the likelihood that actual election results would fall within the intervals.
Polling firm Last date
of polling[1]
Link LPC CPC NDP BQ GPC PPC Margin
of error[2]
Sample
size[3]
Polling method[4] Lead
ElectionOctober 21, 2019HTML33.134.316.07.66.51.61.2
Nanos ResearchOctober 20, 2019PDF31.732.520.87.26.01.5±3.6 pp800telephone0.8
Mainstreet ResearchOctober 20, 2019HTML31.632.218.37.96.12.8±2.17 pp2,032IVR0.6
Research Co.October 20, 2019HTML323119782±3.1 pp957online1
EKOSOctober 20, 2019PDF34.230.018.35.08.13.5±2.2 pp1,994telephone/IVR4.2
Campaign ResearchOctober 20, 2019HTML31.431.317.86.69.12.7±1.4 pp1,498online (rolling)0.1
IpsosOctober 19, 2019HTML313318763±2 pp3,108online/telephone2
Abacus DataOctober 19, 2019HTML343216882±2.1 pp2,000online2
Nanos ResearchOctober 19, 2019PDF31.031.518.87.09.51.8±2.4 pp1,600 (1/2)telephone (rolling)0.5
Campaign ResearchOctober 19, 2019HTML31.731.417.46.69.12.7±1.6 pp1,554online (rolling)0.3
Forum ResearchOctober 18, 2019PDF31.729.917.59.08.33.0±3 pp1,206IVR1.8
LegerOctober 18, 2019PDF333318862±2.13 pp2,117online0
Mainstreet ResearchOctober 18, 2019HTML32.831.918.37.25.53.3±2.11 pp2,134 (1/3)IVR (rolling)0.9
Nanos ResearchOctober 18, 2019PDF32.630.318.47.19.31.9±2.8 pp1,200 (1/3)telephone (rolling)2.3
Campaign ResearchOctober 18, 2019HTML313118793±2.2 pp1,987online0
Innovative ResearchOctober 17, 2019PDF333114984N/A1,964online2
Innovative ResearchOctober 17, 2019PDF343019682N/A3,094online4
EKOSOctober 17, 2019PDF31.032.517.65.57.93.6±2.3 pp1,881telephone/IVR1.5
Mainstreet ResearchOctober 17, 2019HTML32.131.918.87.65.83.0±2.11 pp2,163 (1/3)IVR (rolling)0.2
Nanos ResearchOctober 17, 2019PDF31.531.619.06.29.51.8±2.8 pp1,200 (1/3)telephone (rolling)0.1
DART/MaruOctober 16, 2019PDF293321872±2.9 pp1,518online4
Forum ResearchOctober 16, 2019PDF302920784±3 pp1,028IVR1
Mainstreet ResearchOctober 16, 2019HTML31.930.918.67.67.03.2±2.12 pp2,128 (1/3)IVR (rolling)1.0
Nanos ResearchOctober 16, 2019PDF31.532.518.96.09.21.6±2.8 pp1,200 (1/3)telephone (rolling)1.0
Mainstreet ResearchOctober 15, 2019HTML30.930.618.37.97.73.6±2.15 pp2,070 (1/3)IVR (rolling)0.3
Nanos ResearchOctober 15, 2019PDF31.932.518.85.99.41.1±2.8 pp1,200 (1/3)telephone (rolling)0.6
Angus ReidOctober 15, 2019PDF293319883±2.0 pp2,100online4
EKOSOctober 15, 2019PDF31.231.818.46.46.83.4±2.3 pp1,904telephone/IVR0.6
Mainstreet ResearchOctober 14, 2019HTML30.731.117.28.18.53.6±2.15 pp2,076 (1/3)IVR (rolling)0.4
IpsosOctober 13, 2019HTML303220782±2.4 pp2,204online/telephone2
Mainstreet ResearchOctober 13, 2019HTML30.732.316.67.88.33.4±2.11 pp2,150IVR (rolling)1.6
Nanos ResearchOctober 13, 2019PDF32.332.119.25.99.31.0±2.8 pp1,200 (1/3)telephone (rolling)0.2
Nanos ResearchOctober 12, 2019PDF31.532.319.76.29.01.1±2.8 pp1,200 (1/3)telephone (rolling)0.8
Nanos ResearchOctober 11, 2019PDF33.232.118.15.98.91.4±2.8 pp1,200 (1/3)telephone (rolling)1.1
Abacus DataOctober 10, 2019HTML323218692±1.9 pp3,000online0
Campaign ResearchOctober 10, 2019HTML2931197103±1.54 pp4,037online2
Mainstreet ResearchOctober 10, 2019HTML28.931.716.67.69.44.2±2 pp2,274 (1/3)IVR (rolling)2.8
Nanos ResearchOctober 10, 2019PDF35.433.215.35.38.81.4±2.8 pp1,200 (1/3)telephone (rolling)2.2
Innovative ResearchOctober 10, 2019PDF3531156103N/A2,394online4
Angus ReidOctober 10, 2019PDF293417793±1.8 pp3,031online5
EKOSOctober 10, 2019PDF30.531.713.15.412.84.7±2.2 pp1,947telephone/IVR1.2
DART/MaruOctober 9, 2019PDF283320972±3.1 pp1,510online5
Mainstreet ResearchOctober 9, 2019HTML30.232.215.17.29.84.0±2.04 pp2,309 (1/3)IVR (rolling)2.0
Nanos ResearchOctober 9, 2019PDF36.933.214.15.18.21.6±2.8 pp1,200 (1/3)telephone (rolling)3.7
LegerOctober 8, 2019PDF3131187113±2.11 pp2,150online0
Forum ResearchOctober 8, 2019PDF2835137123±3 pp1,013IVR7
Mainstreet ResearchOctober 8, 2019HTML31.732.014.36.110.34.2±2 pp2,445 (1/3)IVR (rolling)0.3
Nanos ResearchOctober 8, 2019PDF35.634.813.45.29.11.2±2.8 pp1,200 (1/3)telephone (rolling)0.8
Mainstreet ResearchOctober 7, 2019HTML32.633.113.26.510.13.4±2.11 pp2,108 (1/3)IVR (rolling)0.5
Nanos ResearchOctober 7, 2019PDF34.634.813.55.19.81.1±2.8 pp1,200 (1/3)telephone (rolling)0.2
IpsosOctober 7, 2019HTML353415772±2.9 pp1,502online1
Innovative ResearchOctober 7, 2019PDF3533135104N/A2,835online2
Mainstreet ResearchOctober 6, 2019HTML33.133.313.36.39.72.9±2.13 pp2,108IVR (rolling)0.2
Nanos ResearchOctober 6, 2019PDF34.333.415.05.19.61.5±2.8 pp1,200 (1/3)telephone (rolling)0.9
Abacus DataOctober 5, 2019HTML353316581±2 pp1,556online2
Nanos ResearchOctober 5, 2019PDF36.732.715.04.98.01.8±2.8 pp1,200 (1/3)telephone (rolling)4.0
Nanos ResearchOctober 4, 2019PDF36.232.615.65.87.41.8±2.8 pp1,200 (1/3)telephone (rolling)3.6
Mainstreet ResearchOctober 3, 2019HTML34.334.811.45.89.13.2±2.07 pp2,207 (1/3)IVR (rolling)0.5
Nanos ResearchOctober 3, 2019PDF36.334.313.85.98.21.2±2.8 pp1,200 (1/3)telephone (rolling)2.0
Campaign ResearchOctober 2, 2019HTML3234145113±1.4 pp4,755online2
Mainstreet ResearchOctober 2, 2019HTML33.436.411.95.79.02.5±2.07 pp2,234 (1/3)IVR (rolling)3.0
Nanos ResearchOctober 2, 2019PDF32.935.214.95.59.91.4±2.8 pp1,200 (1/3)telephone (rolling)2.3
Forum ResearchOctober 1, 2019PDF3431126124±3 pp1,853IVR3
Mainstreet ResearchOctober 1, 2019HTML33.536.011.65.310.02.8±2.06 pp2,259 (1/3)IVR (rolling)2.5
Nanos ResearchOctober 1, 2019PDF34.233.915.24.510.21.8±2.8 pp1,200 (1/3)telephone (rolling)0.3
Mainstreet ResearchSeptember 30, 2019HTML33.336.111.65.310.02.9±2.1 pp2,183 (1/3)IVR (rolling)2.8
Nanos ResearchSeptember 30, 2019PDF32.234.514.34.411.13.0±2.8 pp1,200 (1/3)telephone (rolling)2.3
LegerSeptember 30, 2019PDF3434145112±2.48 pp1,558online0
Angus ReidSeptember 30, 2019PDF303714783±3 pp1,522online7
IpsosSeptember 30, 2019HTML343715572±2.9 pp1,489online3
Mainstreet ResearchSeptember 29, 2019HTML34.434.110.95.610.53.4±2.12 pp2,140 (1/3)IVR (rolling)0.3
Nanos ResearchSeptember 29, 2019PDF32.734.013.24.112.62.5±2.8 pp1,200 (1/3)telephone (rolling)1.3
EKOSSeptember 29, 2019PDF33.431.111.43.013.45.1±2.5 pp1,492telephone/IVR2.3
Mainstreet ResearchSeptember 28, 2019HTML34.033.711.75.810.13.7±2.06 pp2,270 (2/3)IVR (rolling)0.3
Nanos ResearchSeptember 28, 2019PDF32.534.213.04.612.62.1±2.8 pp1,200 (1/3)telephone (rolling)1.7
Nanos ResearchSeptember 27, 2019PDF32.634.114.43.813.21.3±2.8 pp1,200 (1/3)telephone (rolling)1.5
Research Co.September 26, 2019HTML363315592±3.1 pp1,000online3
Mainstreet ResearchSeptember 26, 2019HTML33.435.610.75.69.73.7±1.98 pp2,436 (1/3)IVR (rolling)2.2
Nanos ResearchSeptember 26, 2019PDF34.433.715.04.410.51.8±2.8 pp1,200 (1/3)telephone (rolling)0.7
Abacus DataSeptember 26, 2019HTML3533155102±2.3 pp1,975online2
Mainstreet ResearchSeptember 25, 2019HTML34.435.810.75.59.23.4±2.1 pp2,425 (1/3)IVR (rolling)1.4
Nanos ResearchSeptember 25, 2019PDF35.533.614.54.79.52.0±2.8 pp1,200 (1/3)telephone (rolling)1.9
Innovative ResearchSeptember 25, 2019PDF3531145105N/A2,302online4
Mainstreet ResearchSeptember 24, 2019HTML35.235.510.85.29.32.9±2.1 pp2,389 (1/3)IVR (rolling)0.3
Nanos ResearchSeptember 24, 2019PDF35.335.412.75.58.82.1±2.8 pp1,200 (1/3)telephone (rolling)0.1
LegerSeptember 24, 2019PDF3433135114±2.11 pp2,153online1
Innovative ResearchSeptember 24, 2019PDF3534125104N/A2,496online1
Mainstreet ResearchSeptember 23, 2019HTML34.435.911.24.89.6±2.03 pp2,333 (1/3)IVR (rolling)1.5
Nanos ResearchSeptember 23, 2019PDF35.133.512.95.710.12.4±2.8 pp1,200 (1/3)telephone (rolling)1.6
Angus ReidSeptember 23, 2019PDF3035156113±2.5 pp1,523online5
IpsosSeptember 23, 2019HTML3236154112±2.9 pp1,500online4
Mainstreet ResearchSeptember 22, 2019HTML33.735.8±2.1 pp2,168 (1/3)IVR (rolling)2.1
Nanos ResearchSeptember 22, 2019PDF33.134.312.85.810.62.9±2.8 pp1,200 (1/3)telephone (rolling)1.2
EKOSSeptember 22, 2019PDF32.035.310.94.910.34.1±2.8 pp1,272IVR3.3
Abacus DataSeptember 22, 2019HTML3234154103±2.3 pp1,929online2
Mainstreet ResearchSeptember 21, 2019HTML33.934.811.44.910.73.6±2.13 pp2,124 (1/3)IVR (rolling)0.9
Forum ResearchSeptember 21, 2019PDF3333116115±3 pp2,449IVR0
Nanos ResearchSeptember 21, 2019PDF32.935.514.05.39.52.2±2.8 pp1,200 (1/3)telephone (rolling)2.6
DART/MaruSeptember 20, 2019PDF303715683±2.9 pp1,520online7
Mainstreet ResearchSeptember 20, 2019HTML35.934.210.94.810.43.1±2.14 pp2,087 (1/3)IVR (rolling)1.7
Nanos ResearchSeptember 20, 2019PDF32.036.813.75.49.02.4±2.8 pp1,200 (1/3)telephone (rolling)4.8
Mainstreet ResearchSeptember 19, 2019HTML36.834.210.14.79.83.7±2.14 pp2,087 (1/3)IVR (rolling)2.6
Nanos ResearchSeptember 19, 2019PDF34.237.412.83.59.32.4±2.8 pp1,200 (1/3)telephone (rolling)3.2
Mainstreet ResearchSeptember 18, 2019HTML37.234.49.84.410.13.3±2.21 pp1,935 (2/3)IVR (rolling)2.8
Nanos ResearchSeptember 18, 2019PDF35.037.811.84.07.72.8±2.8 pp1,200 (1/3)telephone (rolling)2.8
Nanos ResearchSeptember 17, 2019PDF35.537.213.64.07.01.7±2.8 pp1,200 (1/3)telephone (rolling)1.7
LegerSeptember 17, 2019PDF3433125114±2.45 pp1,598online1
Mainstreet ResearchSeptember 16, 2019HTML36.834.89.74.59.43.8±2.23 pp1,935 (1/3)IVR (rolling)2.0
Nanos ResearchSeptember 16, 2019PDF34.935.915.44.76.51.8±2.8 pp1,200 (1/3)telephone (rolling)1.0
Angus ReidSeptember 16, 2019PDF333613594±2.0 pp2,154online3
Mainstreet ResearchSeptember 15, 2019Twitter HTML36.535.09.64.39.93.5±2.23 pp1,935IVR (rolling)1.5
Nanos ResearchSeptember 15, 2019PDF34.034.416.44.47.82.3±2.8 pp1,200 (1/3)telephone (rolling)0.4
Innovative ResearchSeptember 15, 2019PDF3532144114N/A1,622online3
Nanos ResearchSeptember 14, 2019PDF35.232.316.63.89.62.0±2.8 pp1,200 (1/3)telephone (rolling)2.9
IpsosSeptember 13, 2019HTML353514492±2.2 pp2,562online/telephone0
Nanos ResearchSeptember 13, 2019PDF35.432.815.73.69.52.4±2.8 pp1,200telephone (rolling)2.6
DART/MaruSeptember 11, 2019PDF323515682±2.9 pp1,517online3
Forum ResearchSeptember 11, 2019PDF32.436.38.64.111.64.9±3 pp1,001IVR3.9

Pre-campaign period

Evolution of voting intentions according to polls conducted during the pre-campaign period of the 2019 Canadian federal election, graphed from the data in the table below. Trendlines are local regressions, with polls weighted by proximity in time and a logarithmic function of sample size. 95% confidence ribbons represent uncertainty about the trendlines, not the likelihood that actual election results would fall within the intervals.
Polling firm Last date
of polling[1]
Link LPC CPC NDP BQ GPC PPC[5] Margin
of error[2]
Sample
size[3]
Polling method[4] Lead
Abacus DataSeptember 10, 2019HTML3335154103±2.2 pp2,000online2
LegerSeptember 9, 2019PDF3435115113±2.49 pp1,546online1
Mainstreet ResearchSeptember 8, 2019HTML37.534.08.43.610.84.6±2.26 pp1,876IVR3.5
Nanos ResearchSeptember 6, 2019HTML34.630.716.54.011.02.0±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)3.9
Campaign ResearchSeptember 5, 2019HTML3434124122±2.14 pp2,094online0
Innovative ResearchSeptember 5, 2019PDF3334135115N/A3,236online1
Nanos ResearchAugust 30, 2019HTML35.431.315.74.410.31.6±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)4.1
EKOSAugust 29, 2019PDF37.232.97.25.510.44.3±3.3 pp902IVR4.3
LegerAugust 29, 2019PDF3433125123±2.14 pp2,102online1
Abacus DataAugust 29, 2019HTML333417493±1.5 pp4,549online1
Angus ReidAugust 26, 2019PDF323614494±2.5 pp1,534online4
Nanos ResearchAugust 23, 2019HTML33.6633.6514.874.179.412.09 ±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)0.01
EKOSAugust 22, 2019PDF33.134.110.45.111.23.7±2.9 pp1,182IVR1.0
LegerAugust 19, 2019PDF3333114134±2.5 pp1,535online0
IpsosAugust 19, 2019HTML333518391±3.5 pp1,001online2
Abacus DataAugust 19, 2019HTML3232174103±2.2 pp2,152online0
DART/MaruAugust 17, 2019PDF323915571±2.9 pp1,512online7
Nanos ResearchAugust 16, 2019HTML34.6131.4114.584.1610.001.68 ±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)3.20
Campaign ResearchAugust 13, 2019HTML3233134123±2 pp2,365online1
Nanos ResearchAugust 9, 2019HTML35.0032.4614.753.699.801.33 ±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)2.54
Abacus DataAugust 6, 2019HTML3233174103±2.7 pp1,422online1
Nanos ResearchAugust 2, 2019Twitter36.730.816.13.79.31.4±3.1 pp1,000 (1/2)telephone (rolling)5.9
Mainstreet ResearchJuly 31, 2019HTML34.534.111.14.411.13.3±1.97 pp2,463IVR0.4
Innovative ResearchJuly 31, 2019PDF3632144104N/A1,804online4
Forum ResearchJuly 28, 2019PDF3134125125±3 pp1,733IVR3
EKOSJuly 25, 2019PDF30.636.09.94.612.93.8±2.9 pp1,115IVR5.4
LegerJuly 23, 2019PDF3336114123±2.5 pp1,536online3
EKOSJuly 18, 2019PDF33.631.312.53.112.54.8±2.9 pp1,186IVR2.3
Nanos ResearchJuly 19, 2019Twitter35.630.018.64.09.01.4±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)5.6
Research Co.July 17, 2019HTML3431174103±3.1 pp1,000online3
Abacus DataJuly 17, 2019HTML3232164113±2.6 pp1,500online0
IpsosJuly 15, 2019HTML313718571±3.5 pp1,000online6
Campaign ResearchJuly 12, 2019HTML3332144143±2.3 pp1,896online1
Angus ReidJuly 12, 2019PDF3038144102±2.0 pp2,361online8
Nanos ResearchJuly 12, 2019PDF35.929.718.54.88.31.5±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)6.2
EKOSJuly 8, 2019PDF30.732.310.85.014.94.2±3.2 pp948IVR1.6
Innovative ResearchJuly 8, 2019PDF3532124115N/A2,515online3
Nanos ResearchJuly 5, 2019PDF34.630.417.94.98.81.6±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)4.2
Abacus DataJuly 2, 2019HTML3233164113±1.8 pp3,092online1
Mainstreet ResearchJuly 2, 2019HTML35.033.210.44.510.34.6±1.9 pp2,651IVR1.8
EKOSJune 29, 2019HTML31.634.19.73.812.65.7N/A1,194IVR2.5
Nanos ResearchJune 28, 2019PDF34.531.716.54.69.80.9±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)2.8
DART/MaruJune 26, 2019PDF333717571±2.9 pp1,512online4
Forum ResearchJune 23, 2019PDF2935135124±3 pp1,539IVR6
Nanos ResearchJune 21, 2019PDF32.532.816.94.910.20.7±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)0.3
EKOSJune 17, 2019PDF30.134.212.04.313.23.6±2.0 pp2,491IVR4.1
Nanos ResearchJune 14, 2019PDF30.334.016.84.611.40.7±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)3.7
LegerJune 10, 2019PDF2938134113±2.5 pp1,528online9
IpsosJune 7, 2019HTML31371856±3.5 pp1,003online6
Nanos ResearchJune 7, 2019PDF30.934.216.94.011.30.8±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)3.3
Campaign ResearchJune 6, 2019HTML3235144122±1.9 pp2,735online3
Angus ReidJune 4, 2019PDF2637155124±2 pp4,698online11
Forum ResearchJune 2, 2019PDF3034136134±3 pp1,633IVR4
Nanos ResearchMay 31, 2019PDF29.534.316.44.411.50.8±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)4.8
Innovative ResearchMay 30, 2019PDF333312513N/A1,691online0
Abacus DataMay 30, 2019HTML3332163123±2.6 pp1,500online1
Nanos ResearchMay 24, 2019PDF29.234.815.64.711.51.6±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)5.6
Nanos ResearchMay 17, 2019PDF30.635.914.24.011.11.1±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)5.3
Nanos ResearchMay 10, 2019PDF29.735.415.04.411.30.9±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)5.7
Nanos ResearchMay 3, 2019PDF31.834.515.94.69.70.9±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)2.7
Campaign ResearchMay 1, 2019HTML 3135173102±2.6 pp1,471online4
Angus ReidApril 30, 2019PDF2538185113±2.5 pp1,525online13
Abacus DataApril 30, 2019HTML313417493±1.5 pp4,015online3
Nanos ResearchApril 26, 2019PDF32.034.916.54.19.00.5±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)2.9
IpsosApril 25, 2019HTML3236195±3.5 pp1,000online4
Forum ResearchApril 24, 2019PDF303714692±3 pp1,595IVR7
LegerApril 22, 2019PDF2740125113±2.5 pp1,522online13
Nanos ResearchApril 18, 2019PDF33.035.515.24.78.40.8±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)2.5
Nanos ResearchApril 12, 2019PDF34.135.014.94.58.80.7±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)0.9
Innovative ResearchApril 10, 2019PDF363213410N/A2,527online4
Forum ResearchApril 6, 2019PDF294212692±3 pp1,634IVR13
Campaign ResearchApril 6, 2019HTML3234155103±2.2 pp2,035online2
Nanos ResearchApril 5, 2019PDF32.834.916.64.09.50.5±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)2.1
Nanos ResearchMarch 29, 2019PDF34.635.116.64.48.10.5±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)0.5
IpsosMarch 27, 2019HTML3040215±3.5 pp1,002online10
Mainstreet ResearchMarch 25, 2019HTML35.037.411.63.17.93.8±1.06 pp8,501IVR2.4
Angus ReidMarch 25, 2019PDF283717584±2 pp5,807online9
Nanos ResearchMarch 22, 2019PDF32.534.619.43.98.30.6±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)2.1
Forum ResearchMarch 20, 2019PDF354114162±3 pp1,490IVR6
LegerMarch 20, 2019PDF3137144103±2.51 pp1,513online6
Nanos ResearchMarch 15, 2019PDF32.635.519.93.27.70.5±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)2.9
Abacus DataMarch 10, 2019Twitter323416411±3.3 pp900 (1/3)online (rolling)2
Campaign ResearchMarch 10, 2019HTML3036164102±2.5 pp1,893online6
Abacus DataMarch 9, 2019HTML313516411±3.3 pp900 (1/3)online (rolling)4
Abacus DataMarch 8, 2019HTML313615510±3.3 pp900 (1/3)online (rolling)5
Nanos ResearchMarch 8, 2019PDF32.936.117.93.68.30.5±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)3.2
Abacus DataMarch 7, 2019HTML333416410±3.3 pp900 (1/3)online (rolling)1
Abacus DataMarch 6, 2019HTML32341849±3.3 pp900 (1/3)online (rolling)2
Abacus DataMarch 5, 2019HTML31351749±3.3 pp900 (1/3)online (rolling)4
Innovative ResearchMarch 4, 2019PDF363213595N/A2,122online4
IpsosMarch 4, 2019HTML314020440±3.5 pp1,000online9
Abacus DataMarch 4, 2019HTML30361759±2.6 pp1,500online6
Nanos ResearchMarch 1, 2019PDF34.234.715.53.69.10.7±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)0.5
Forum ResearchFebruary 28, 2019PDF334212354±3 pp1,301IVR9
Abacus DataFebruary 26, 2019HTML32331749±2.1 pp2,374online1
Angus ReidFebruary 24, 2019PDF31381458±3.1 pp1,009online7
Nanos ResearchFebruary 22, 2019PDF35.733.615.03.78.41.2±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)2.1
LegerFebruary 19, 2019PDF343612584±2.51 pp1,529online2
IpsosFebruary 18, 2019HTML3436176±3.5 pp1,002online2
Nanos ResearchFebruary 15, 2019PDF37.931.813.74.17.81.5±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)6.1
Abacus DataFebruary 11, 2019HTML33351549±2.0 pp2,500online2
Campaign ResearchFebruary 11, 2019HTML323714573±2.5 pp1,590online5
Nanos ResearchFebruary 8, 2019PDF37.534.413.03.87.41.7±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)3.1
Abacus DataFebruary 5, 2019HTML34341748±2.0 pp2,500online0
Nanos ResearchFebruary 1, 2019PDF37.635.913.23.17.91.7±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)1.7
Nanos ResearchJanuary 25, 2019PDF37.636.612.83.08.11.2±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)1.0
Innovative ResearchJanuary 24, 2019PDF383212584N/A2,451online6
Mainstreet ResearchJanuary 18, 2019HTML37.235.111.53.27.24.2±1.1 pp7,941IVR2.1
Nanos ResearchJanuary 18, 2019PDF37.236.114.23.27.41.5±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)1.1
Yves-François Blanchet is acclaimed leader of the Bloc Québécois (January 17, 2019)
Nanos ResearchJanuary 11, 2019PDF38.133.915.43.36.91.6±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)4.2
Innovative ResearchJanuary 7, 2019PDF363315584N/A2,700online3
Nanos ResearchJanuary 4, 2019PDF38.733.316.73.06.01.4±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)5.4
Nanos ResearchDecember 28, 2018PDF36.834.416.13.46.41.2±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)2.4
Nanos ResearchDecember 21, 2018PDF35.234.116.03.87.01.5±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)1.1
Abacus DataDecember 18, 2018HTML35341747±2.5 pp2,000online1
Nanos ResearchDecember 14, 2018PDF36.033.916.63.46.60.7±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)2.1
Campaign ResearchDecember 13, 2018HTML333516482±2.5 pp1,494online2
IpsosDecember 12, 2018HTML3833184±2.5 pp2,001online5
Nanos ResearchDecember 7, 2018PDF34.134.815.83.18.20.8±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)0.7
Nanos ResearchNovember 30, 2018PDF37.932.214.33.07.60.8±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)5.7
Forum ResearchNovember 29, 2018PDF34431146±3 pp1,541IVR9
Nanos ResearchNovember 23, 2018PDF39.631.514.52.46.91.1±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)8.1
LegerNovember 20, 2018PDF393314454±2.51 pp1,521online6
Nanos ResearchNovember 16, 2018PDF39.428.717.22.57.31.1±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)10.7
Innovative ResearchNovember 15, 2018PDF383214483N/A2,490online6
Abacus DataNovember 13, 2018HTML38311649±2.6 pp1,500online7
Campaign ResearchNovember 9, 2018HTML35351747±2.5 pp2,512online0
Nanos ResearchNovember 9, 2018PDF39.427.519.82.06.11.4±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)11.9
Mainstreet ResearchNovember 7, 2018HTML39.334.610.83.46.83.8±1.09 pp7,961IVR4.7
Nanos ResearchNovember 2, 2018PDF39.628.119.31.96.91.2±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)11.5
Nanos ResearchOctober 26, 2018PDF39.428.219.32.86.51.0±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)11.2
Nanos ResearchOctober 19, 2018PDF39.529.416.93.67.01.4±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)10.1
Nanos ResearchOctober 12, 2018PDF37.131.416.13.77.21.3±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)5.7
Forum ResearchOctober 10, 2018PDF32411547±3 pp1,226IVR9
IpsosOctober 9, 2018PDF3635204±2.5 pp2,001online1
Nanos ResearchOctober 5, 2018PDF37.331.116.23.86.7±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)6.2
Innovative ResearchOctober 1, 2018PDF383115573N/A2,410online7
Nanos ResearchSeptember 28, 2018PDF38.031.716.72.66.0±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)6.3
Nanos ResearchSeptember 21, 2018PDF39.031.217.02.45.5±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)7.8
PollaraSeptember 20, 2018PDF403412372±3.1 pp1,002online6
Abacus DataSeptember 19, 2018HTML38341737±2.2 pp2,000online4
DART/MaruSeptember 19, 2018PDF30381758±2.1 pp5,769online8
Maxime Bernier forms the People's Party of Canada following his resignation from the Conservative Party caucus (September 14, 2018)
Campaign ResearchSeptember 14, 2018HTML363815570±2.5 pp1,486online2
Nanos ResearchSeptember 14, 2018PDF41.131.414.92.05.80±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)9.7
Nanos ResearchSeptember 7, 2018PDF39.932.814.92.56.50±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)7.1
Nanos ResearchAugust 31, 2018PDF39.932.415.83.46.70±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)7.5
Abacus DataAugust 25, 2018HTML373418360±3.1 pp1,000online3
Nanos ResearchAugust 24, 2018PDF38.834.416.52.96.30±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)4.4
Abacus DataAugust 20, 2018HTML373318380±2.5 pp1,500online4
Nanos ResearchAugust 17, 2018PDF37.533.919.03.25.70±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)3.6
Forum ResearchAugust 12, 2018PDF364215240±3 pp1,777IVR6
Nanos ResearchAugust 10, 2018PDF35.835.120.13.24.80±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)0.7
Nanos ResearchAugust 3, 2018PDF36.936.617.82.35.20±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)0.3
Nanos ResearchJuly 27, 2018PDF35.835.219.12.26.60±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)0.6
EKOSJuly 26, 2018Twitter34.932.117.34.09.30±2.7 pp1,302IVR2.8
Abacus DataJuly 22, 2018HTML363419370±2.2 pp2,000online2
Nanos ResearchJuly 20, 2018PDF35.835.919.02.06.10±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)0.1
Mainstreet ResearchJuly 17, 2018HTML39.436.911.82.47.00±1.01 pp9,384IVR2.5
IpsosJuly 16, 2018HTML39322120±3.5 pp1,000online7
Nanos ResearchJuly 13, 2018PDF37.334.518.41.87.10±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)2.8
Nanos ResearchJuly 6, 2018PDF35.733.420.32.46.80±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)2.3
IpsosJune 29, 2018HTML33372130±3.5 pp1,002online4
Nanos ResearchJune 29, 2018PDF36.533.120.82.75.40±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)3.4
Nanos ResearchJune 22, 2018PDF36.732.020.63.65.70±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)4.7
Campaign ResearchJune 18, 2018HTML343618380±2.5 pp1,579online2
IpsosJune 15, 2018HTML32362050±3.5 pp1,001online4
Nanos ResearchJune 15, 2018PDF36.932.519.94.15.10±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)4.4
Angus ReidJune 14, 2018PDF363216490±3.1 pp1,023online4
Mario Beaulieu is named interim leader of the Bloc Québécois (June 13, 2018)
Nanos ResearchJune 8, 2018PDF35.333.022.04.14.80±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)2.3
Nanos ResearchJune 1, 2018PDF34.134.021.24.45.40±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)0.1
Forum ResearchMay 31, 2018PDF314417250±3 pp969IVR13
Nanos ResearchMay 25, 2018PDF33.036.019.84.06.40±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)3.0
Nanos ResearchMay 18, 2018PDF35.134.020.13.65.90±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)1.1
Forum ResearchMay 16, 2018PDF304618240±3 pp1,484IVR16
Innovative ResearchMay 14, 2018PDF353815470N/A2,327online3
Nanos ResearchMay 11, 2018PDF36.134.418.53.76.00±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)1.7
LegerMay 10, 2018HTML39361520±2.1 pp2,103online3
Nanos ResearchMay 4, 2018PDF38.033.217.64.25.40±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)4.8
Innovative ResearchMay 2, 2018PDF353816460±3.1 pp1,000telephone3
IpsosApril 30, 2018HTML36352030±2.6 pp1,907online1
Nanos ResearchApril 27, 2018PDF39.230.618.24.45.90±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)8.6
Forum ResearchApril 20, 2018PDF304314480±2 pp1,585IVR13
Nanos ResearchApril 20, 2018PDF38.231.617.93.77.00±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)6.6
Mainstreet ResearchApril 18, 2018HTML40.437.111.92.65.90±1.01 pp9,401IVR3.3
Nanos ResearchApril 13, 2018PDF41.129.215.83.88.20±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)11.9
Nanos ResearchApril 6, 2018PDF38.232.917.23.07.00±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)5.3
Nanos ResearchMarch 29, 2018PDF39.133.716.42.46.50±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)5.4
IpsosMarch 23, 2018HTML31382330±3.5 pp1,003online7
Nanos ResearchMarch 23, 2018PDF38.134.716.83.15.50±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)3.4
Nanos ResearchMarch 16, 2018PDF35.934.818.53.56.20±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)1.1
Angus ReidMarch 15, 2018PDF304019460±2 pp5,423online10
Nanos ResearchMarch 9, 2018PDF35.833.119.34.56.70±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)2.7
LegerMarch 8, 2018PDF383814350±2.5 pp1,536online0
Abacus DataMarch 4, 2018PDF363318380±2.2 pp4,023online3
Nanos ResearchMarch 2, 2018PDF36.532.719.04.07.10±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)3.8
IpsosMarch 1, 2018PDF33382130±3.5 pp1,001online5
Forum ResearchMarch 1, 2018PDF344614230±3 pp941IVR12
Nanos ResearchFebruary 23, 2018PDF37.731.519.23.86.90±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)6.2
Nanos ResearchFebruary 16, 2018PDF36.630.820.33.38.00±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)5.8
Campaign ResearchFebruary 10, 2018HTML393216470±2.1 pp2,227online7
Nanos ResearchFebruary 9, 2018PDF38.130.418.53.18.80±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)7.7
Nanos ResearchFebruary 2, 2018PDF38.130.319.73.07.60±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)7.8
Abacus DataJanuary 28, 2018PDF393218460±2.7 pp1,411online7
Nanos ResearchJanuary 26, 2018PDF37.830.619.93.57.50±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)7.2
Forum ResearchJanuary 24, 2018PDF384312330±3 pp1,408IVR5
Nanos ResearchJanuary 19, 2018PDF37.934.417.33.76.00±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)3.5
Nanos ResearchJanuary 12, 2018PDF37.033.820.03.84.50±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)3.2
Campaign ResearchJanuary 11, 2018HTML422916470±2.3 pp1,887online13
Mainstreet ResearchJanuary 6, 2018HTML40.334.513.14.47.70±0.99 pp9,830IVR5.8
Nanos ResearchJanuary 5, 2018PDF40.930.719.53.74.80±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)10.2
Nanos ResearchDecember 29, 2017PDF41.630.120.13.54.20±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)11.5
Nanos ResearchDecember 22, 2017PDF42.829.120.03.34.20±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)13.7
Nanos ResearchDecember 15, 2017PDF41.929.319.13.45.70±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)12.6
Forum ResearchDecember 14, 2017PDF383912550±3 pp1,284IVR1
IpsosDecember 14, 2017PDF38312050±2.4 pp2,098online7
Nanos ResearchDecember 8, 2017PDF40.730.317.53.86.70±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)10.4
Nanos ResearchDecember 1, 2017PDF40.130.716.54.26.90±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)9.4
LegerNovember 30, 2017PDF403413480±2.4 pp1,609online6
Nanos ResearchNovember 24, 2017PDF38.830.617.24.46.90±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)8.2
Nanos ResearchNovember 17, 2017PDF39.330.716.65.07.00±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)8.6
Abacus DataNovember 14, 2017PDF403218460±2.6 pp1,500online8
Nanos ResearchNovember 10, 2017PDF38.330.917.55.36.00±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)7.4
Campaign ResearchNovember 9, 2017HTML383019570±1.9 pp2,616online8
Forum ResearchNovember 6, 2017PDF363814660±3 pp1,281IVR2
Nanos ResearchNovember 3, 2017PDF36.629.619.05.96.40±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)7.0
Nanos ResearchOctober 27, 2017PDF36.129.618.56.16.60±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)6.5
Insights WestOctober 26, 2017HTML353320470±3.1 pp1,005online2
IpsosOctober 25, 2017PDF38302340±3.5 pp1,001online8
LegerOctober 25, 2017PDF423015470±2.5 pp1,534online12
Abacus DataOctober 23, 2017PDF393515550±2.6 pp1,500online4
Nanos ResearchOctober 20, 2017PDF35.030.817.76.36.90±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)4.2
EnvironicsOctober 16, 2017PDF3830205702,000online8
Nanos ResearchOctober 13, 2017PDF34.631.316.37.27.30±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)3.3
Angus ReidOctober 12, 2017PDF353518460±2.5 pp1,492online0
Campaign ResearchOctober 11, 2017HTML383019480±2.2 pp2,002online8
Nanos ResearchOctober 6, 2017PDF36.932.015.46.65.60±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)4.9
Angus ReidOctober 4, 2017HTML373614480±2.5 pp1,477online1
Jagmeet Singh is elected leader of the New Democratic Party (October 1, 2017)
EKOSOctober 1, 2017PDF34.433.314.54.58.90±1.4 pp4,839IVR1.1
Nanos ResearchSeptember 29, 2017PDF38.131.215.26.36.70±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)6.9
IpsosSeptember 27, 2017PDF39322050±3.5 pp1,001online7
Nanos ResearchSeptember 22, 2017PDF38.532.514.66.15.70±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)6.0
Nanos ResearchSeptember 15, 2017PDF40.930.015.56.05.50±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)10.9
Forum ResearchSeptember 14, 2017PDF353915540±3 pp1,350IVR4
Campaign ResearchSeptember 11, 2017HTML423016560±2.3 pp1,770online12
Nanos ResearchSeptember 8, 2017PDF42.030.115.94.65.90±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)11.9
Abacus DataSeptember 3, 2017PDF433117360±2.6 pp1,512online12
Nanos ResearchSeptember 1, 2017PDF41.232.015.74.94.70±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)9.2
Mainstreet ResearchAugust 31, 2017HTML433215450±2.19 pp2,000telephone11
Nanos ResearchAugust 25, 2017PDF41.930.816.44.35.00±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)11.1
Nanos ResearchAugust 18, 2017PDF39.431.018.25.14.90±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)8.4
Forum ResearchAugust 17, 2017PDF423514440±3 pp1,150IVR7
Nanos ResearchAugust 11, 2017PDF37.831.119.25.25.40±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)6.7
Nanos ResearchAugust 4, 2017PDF37.529.320.26.45.40±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)8.2
Nanos ResearchJuly 28, 2017PDF36.729.120.05.86.80±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)7.6
Nanos ResearchJuly 21, 2017PDF39.030.318.44.26.20±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)8.7
Abacus DataJuly 18, 2017HTML433116350±2.2 pp2,036online12
Nanos ResearchJuly 14, 2017PDF38.331.216.25.96.10±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)7.1
Campaign ResearchJuly 10, 2017HTML403119450±2 pp1,540online9
Nanos ResearchJuly 7, 2017PDF39.833.013.65.36.40±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)6.8
Nanos ResearchJune 30, 2017PDF38.931.614.06.37.60±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)7.3
Nanos ResearchJune 23, 2017PDF38.331.115.76.86.20±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)7.2
EKOSJune 19, 2017HTML35.333.015.23.78.50±1.3 pp5,658IVR2.3
Nanos ResearchJune 16, 2017PDF37.530.916.56.76.50±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)6.6
Campaign ResearchJune 12, 2017HTML393019570±2 pp2,767online9
Angus ReidJune 12, 2017PDF373417460±2 pp5,406online3
Nanos ResearchJune 9, 2017PDF36.830.517.36.17.10±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)6.3
Forum ResearchJune 8, 2017PDF423412560±3 pp1,483IVR8
Nanos ResearchJune 2, 2017PDF40.028.116.56.27.30±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)11.9
Angus ReidMay 31, 2017HTML403316460±2.2 pp1,958online7
Mainstreet ResearchMay 29, 2017HTML413317450±1.85 pp2,800IVR8
Andrew Scheer is elected leader of the Conservative Party of Canada (May 27, 2017)
Nanos ResearchMay 26, 2017PDF40.328.616.75.77.20±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)11.7
Nanos ResearchMay 19, 2017PDF42.127.916.25.27.40±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)14.2
LegerMay 18, 2017PDF462516560±2.5 pp1,529online21
Mainstreet ResearchMay 15, 2017HTML413118550±1.85 pp2,800IVR10
Campaign ResearchMay 13, 2017HTML432719370±2 pp1,969online16
Abacus DataMay 12, 2017PDF432720450±2.9 pp1,182online16
Nanos ResearchMay 12, 2017PDF42.828.115.96.05.60±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)14.7
Nanos ResearchMay 5, 2017PDF41.829.018.85.14.10±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)12.8
Nanos ResearchApril 28, 2017PDF43.029.618.54.43.60±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)13.4
Forum ResearchApril 24, 2017PDF353517570±3 pp1,479IVR0
Nanos ResearchApril 21, 2017PDF42.030.419.04.02.90±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)11.6
Nanos ResearchApril 14, 2017PDF41.432.418.73.43.10±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)9.0
Campaign ResearchApril 11, 2017HTML382919660±2 pp1,970online9
Nanos ResearchApril 7, 2017PDF40.332.618.04.03.50±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)7.7
Nanos ResearchMarch 31, 2017PDF40.629.618.45.24.60±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)11.0
IpsosMarch 30, 2017PDF39322050±3.5 pp1,001online7
Nanos ResearchMarch 24, 2017PDF42.529.216.14.85.20±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)13.3
Forum ResearchMarch 23, 2017PDF363815640±3 pp1,029IVR2
Martine Ouellet is acclaimed leader of the Bloc Québécois (March 18, 2017)
StratcomMarch 17, 2017HTML442916460±2.2 pp2,029online15
Nanos ResearchMarch 17, 2017PDF41.928.517.14.75.20±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)13.4
Nanos ResearchMarch 10, 2017PDF41.428.117.04.96.00±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)13.3
Campaign ResearchMarch 7, 2017HTML432716650±3 pp1,886online/IVR16
Nanos ResearchMarch 3, 2017PDF39.630.517.25.05.10±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)9.1
Forum ResearchFebruary 26, 2017PDF393515740±3 pp1,340IVR4
Nanos ResearchFebruary 24, 2017PDF38.931.016.85.45.20±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)7.9
Abacus DataFebruary 19, 2017PDF403316460±2.6 pp1,500online7
Nanos ResearchFebruary 17, 2017PDF39.329.616.96.35.70±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)9.7
Nanos ResearchFebruary 10, 2017PDF37.932.916.94.85.30±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)5.0
Campaign ResearchFebruary 6, 2017HTML343416660±3 pp1,457IVR0
Nanos ResearchFebruary 3, 2017PDF38.032.516.44.95.90±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)5.5
Nanos ResearchJanuary 27, 2017PDF39.132.116.35.15.50±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)7.0
IpsosJanuary 25, 2017PDF41301950±3.5 pp1,000online11
Forum ResearchJanuary 21, 2017PDF423612450±3 pp1,332IVR6
Nanos ResearchJanuary 20, 2017PDF39.431.216.35.15.90±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)8.2
Nanos ResearchJanuary 13, 2017PDF41.428.416.26.16.10±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)13.0
Nanos ResearchJanuary 6, 2017PDF43.028.516.25.25.40±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)14.5
Nanos ResearchDecember 30, 2016PDF43.027.916.75.55.90±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)15.1
Nanos ResearchDecember 23, 2016PDF42.028.316.95.65.60±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)13.7
Nanos ResearchDecember 16, 2016PDF43.627.416.74.95.60±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)16.2
Abacus DataDecember 14, 2016PDF443016450±2.3 pp1,848online14
Nanos ResearchDecember 9, 2016PDF43.226.716.55.46.00±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)16.5
Forum ResearchDecember 7, 2016PDF423412560±3 pp1,304IVR8
Nanos ResearchDecember 2, 2016PDF42.926.017.44.86.80±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)16.9
Nanos ResearchNovember 25, 2016PDF44.725.117.94.46.40±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)19.6
EKOSNovember 22, 2016PDF41.231.213.02.48.20±2.2 pp1,949IVR10.0
Nanos ResearchNovember 18, 2016PDF42.928.716.05.65.60±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)14.2
Abacus DataNovember 13, 2016PDF462517570±2.1 pp2,200online21
Nanos ResearchNovember 11, 2016PDF46.326.215.44.36.20±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)20.1
Forum ResearchNovember 10, 2016PDF512811450±3 pp1,474IVR23
Mainstreet ResearchNovember 6, 2016HTML492913450±1.38 pp5,066IVR20
Nanos ResearchNovember 4, 2016PDF44.929.613.85.55.50±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)15.3
Nanos ResearchOctober 28, 2016PDF44.529.613.35.36.00±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)14.9
Nanos ResearchOctober 21, 2016PDF46.627.513.94.06.80±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)19.1
EKOSOctober 18, 2016PDF46.626.414.13.37.80±2.4 pp1,622online/telephone20.2
Nanos ResearchOctober 14, 2016PDF46.326.215.44.36.20±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)20.1
Forum ResearchOctober 12, 2016PDF493012540±3 pp1,437IVR19
Abacus DataOctober 12, 2016PDF452814560±2.6 pp1,498online17
Nanos ResearchOctober 7, 2016PDF45.925.916.24.35.70±3.1 pp1,000 (1/4)telephone (rolling)20.0
Nanos ResearchSeptember 30, 2016PDF45.826.216.74.55.00±3.1 pp1,000telephone (rolling)19.6
Forum ResearchSeptember 21, 2016PDF47349630±3 pp1,326IVR13
Mainstreet ResearchSeptember 8, 2016HTML512912440±1.35 pp5,250IVR22
Forum ResearchSeptember 7, 2016PDF483011540±3 pp1,370IVR18
LegerSeptember 1, 2016PDF532512450±2.5 pp1,535online28
Abacus DataAugust 25, 2016PDF462816450±2.2 pp2,010online18
Forum ResearchAugust 6, 2016PDF503110440±3 pp1,345IVR19
EKOSJuly 14, 2016PDF45.628.515.52.85.90±3.1 pp1,003online/telephone17.1
Forum ResearchJuly 5, 2016PDF522811530±3 pp1,429IVR24
Abacus DataJune 16, 2016PDF442816560±2.6 pp1,500online16
Forum ResearchJune 7, 2016PDF493210440±2 pp2,271IVR17
EKOSJune 7, 2016PDF44.726.912.44.17.80±2.0 pp2,371IVR17.8
IpsosMay 24, 2016HTML46301540±3.5 pp1,002online16
Abacus DataMay 20, 2016PDF462715470±2.2 pp2,000online19
Forum ResearchMay 11, 2016PDF522911430±3 pp1,517IVR23
Mainstreet ResearchApril 27, 2016HTML493014340±1.39 pp4,998IVR19
Nanos ResearchApril 22, 2016HTML43.225.819.34.25.50±3.1 pp1,000telephone17.4
Mainstreet ResearchApril 15, 2016HTML483014350±1.38 pp5,012IVR18
EKOSApril 15, 2016PDF44.128.512.04.46.70±2.9 pp1,176IVR15.6
Abacus DataApril 13, 2016PDF492613550±2.6 pp1,500online23
Forum ResearchApril 5, 2016PDF512812630±3 pp1,455IVR23
Innovative ResearchMarch 30, 2016PDF463012560n/a2,456online16
EKOSMarch 29, 2016PDF42.131.711.74.86.40±2.2 pp2,019IVR10.4
Abacus DataMarch 23, 2016PDF472814460±2.6 pp1,500online19
Abacus DataMarch 18, 2016PDF442916460±2.6 pp1,500online15
Forum ResearchMarch 15, 2016PDF463412430±2 pp1,567IVR12
Forum ResearchFebruary 17, 2016PDF493210350±3 pp1,406IVR17
LegerFebruary 4, 2016PDF492715350±2.1 pp1,524online22
EKOSJanuary 18, 2016PDF46.725.315.93.97.00±1.9 pp2,598online/telephone21.4
Mainstreet ResearchJanuary 15, 2016HTML443216350±1.39 pp4,937IVR12
Abacus DataJanuary 12, 2016PDF452817550±2.6 pp1,500online17
EKOSDecember 10, 2015PDF46.327.215.33.46.70±2.2 pp1,956online/telephone19.1
Forum ResearchDecember 8, 2015PDF463213440±3 pp1,369IVR14
Abacus DataNovember 25, 2015PDF492416550±2.6 pp1,500online25
Forum ResearchNovember 17, 2015PDF453710430±3 pp909IVR8
Forum ResearchNovember 7, 2015PDF552512430±3 pp1,256IVR30
Rona Ambrose is named interim leader of the Conservative Party of Canada (November 5, 2015)
2015 ElectionOctober 19, 2015HTML39.531.919.74.73.47.6

Notes

1 Polls that share the same last date of polling are ordered from earliest (below) to latest (above) first date of polling. Polls that have identical field dates are placed in the order in which they were released/published (earliest below, latest above).
2 In cases when linked poll details distinguish between the margin of error associated with the total sample of respondents (including undecided and non-voters) and that of the subsample of decided/leaning voters, the former is included in the table. Also not included is the margin of error created by rounding to the nearest whole number or any margin of error from methodological sources. Most online polls—because of their opt-in method of recruiting panellists which results in a non-random sample—cannot have a margin of error. In such cases, shown is what the margin of error would be for a survey using a random probability-based sample of equivalent size.
3 Refers to the total, "raw" sample size, including undecided and non-voters, and before demographic weighting is applied. Fractions in parentheses apply to rolling polls (see below) and indicate the proportion of the sample that is independent from the previous poll in the series.
4 "Telephone" refers to traditional telephone polls conducted by live interviewers; "IVR" refers to automated Interactive Voice Response polls conducted by telephone; "online" refers to polls conducted exclusively over the internet; "telephone/online" refers to polls which combine results from both telephone and online surveys, or for which respondents are initially recruited by telephone and then asked to complete an online survey. "Rolling" polls contain overlapping data from one poll to the next.
5 The People's Party of Canada was officially created on September 14, 2018 and voting intentions for the party were therefore not polled prior to this date.

Regional polls

A number of polling firms survey federal voting intentions on a regional or provincial level:

Atlantic Canada

Polling firm Last date
of polling
Link LPC CPC NDP BQ GPC PPC[1] Other Margin
of error[2]
Sample
size[3]
Polling method[4] Lead
Narrative ResearchAugust 22, 2019PDF433010-15-2±2.5 pp1,500Telephone13
Narrative ResearchMay 24, 2019PDF39369-14-2±2.5 pp1,500Telephone3

Newfoundland and Labrador

Polling firm Last date
of polling
Link LPC CPC NDP BQ GPC PPC[1] Other Margin
of error[2]
Sample
size[3]
Polling method[4] Lead
MQO ResearchJuly 31, 2019PDF463811-221±4.9 pp400Telephone8
MQO ResearchMay 4, 2019PDF493711-30±4 pp600Telephone12
MQO ResearchJanuary 28, 2019PDF56356-11±4 pp600Telephone21

Prince Edward Island

Polling firm Last date
of polling
Link LPC CPC NDP BQ GPC PPC[1] Other Margin
of error[2]
Sample
size[3]
Polling method[4] Lead
MQO ResearchAugust 6, 2019HTML40344-211±5.7 pp400Telephone6
MQO ResearchApril 16, 2019PDF40328-181±4 pp400Telephone8
MQO ResearchJanuary 27, 201952307-10±4 pp400Telephone22

Nova Scotia

Polling firm Last date
of polling
Link LPC CPC NDP BQ GPC PPC[1] Other Margin
of error[2]
Sample
size[3]
Polling method[4] Lead
MQO ResearchAugust 27, 2019PDF443113-91±4.9 pp400Telephone13
MQO ResearchMay 13, 2019PDF423511-100±4 pp600Telephone7
MQO ResearchFebruary 10, 2019PDF503012-71±4 pp600Telephone20

New Brunswick

Polling firm Last date
of polling
Link LPC CPC NDP BQ GPC PPC[1] Other Margin
of error[2]
Sample
size[3]
Polling method[4] Lead
MQO ResearchAugust 14, 2019PDF41406-94±4.9 pp400Telephone1
MQO ResearchMay 6, 2019PDF36397-161±4 pp600Telephone3
MQO ResearchFebruary 10, 2019PDF44394-103±4 pp600Telephone5

Central Canada

Quebec

Polling firm Last date
of polling
Link LPC CPC NDP BQ GPC PPC[1] Other Margin
of error[2]
Sample
size[3]
Polling method[4] Lead
ElectionOctober 21, 2019HTML34.216.010.732.54.41.51.7
LegerOctober 15, 2019PDF3116143162-±1.793000Online0
Forum ResearchOctober 12, 2019PDF33151031722±3 pp1001IVR2
LegerOctober 10, 2019PDF31161329731-1014Online2
Mainstreet ResearchOctober 6, 2019HTML3517112773-±3.75 pp685IVR8
Mainstreet ResearchSeptember 30, 2019HTML3718102293-±3.7 pp694IVR15
Nanos ResearchSeptember 30, 2019PDF35.317.013.322.010.11.80.6±3.6 pp828telephone13.3
LegerSeptember 17, 201936217221031±3.9 pp837Online14
Mainstreet ResearchSeptember 13, 2019HTML33.024.87.918.69.5--unknownunknownIVR8.2
LegerAugust 29, 2019PDF34237201141±3.39 pp837Online11
Forum ResearchAugust 28, 2019HTML372181894±3 pp1219IVR16
Forum ResearchJuly 24, 2019PDF30289151043±3 pp977IVR2
Forum ResearchJune 12, 2019PDF32259181042±3 pp1,471IVR7
LegerMarch 11, 2019HTML352671794±3.08 pp1,014Online9
LegerJanuary 28, 2019PDF392182156±3.09 pp1,007Online18
LegerAugust 24, 2017PDF4316191662±3 pp1,002Online27

Ontario

Polling firm Last date
of polling
Link LPC CPC NDP BQ GPC PPC[1] Other Margin
of error[2]
Sample
size[3]
Polling method[4] Lead
Campaign ResearchSeptember 19, 2019HTML353912-1021±2.17 pp2035Online/Telephone4
Angus ReidSeptember 18, 2019PDF363515-95--722online1
EKOSSeptember 5, 2019PDF40.829.910.9-11.94.81.8±2.0 pp2393IVR10.9
EKOSAugust 28, 2019Twitter46.729.27.6-9.45.71.3±4.97 pp389IVR17.5
EKOSAugust 27, 2019Twitter443010-1042±1.9 pp2601IVR14
EKOSAugust 19, 2019Twitter42.929.98.6-13.72.52.5±5.39 pp301IVR13
Corbett CommunicationsAugust 13, 2019PDF393114-1241±3 pp1099Online8
EKOSAugust 9, 2019Twitter40.328.911.9-12.25.21.5±4.90 pp400IVR11.4
EKOSJuly 26, 2019Twitter33.835.89.5-13.24.53.2±4.89 pp402IVR2
Corbett CommunicationsJuly 10, 2019PDF383314-1310±3 pp481Online5
Innovative ResearchApril 16, 2019PDF403314-9-4945Online7
Innovative ResearchApril 10, 2019PDF413413-9-4773Online7
Innovative ResearchApril 1, 2019PDF393318-7-3±4 pp605Telephone6
Toronto
Polling firm Last date
of polling
Link LPC CPC NDP BQ GPC PPC[1] Other Margin
of error[2]
Sample
size[3]
Polling method[4] Lead
Forum ResearchSeptember 26, 2019PDF502610-1031±3 pp1,059IVR24
Forum ResearchJuly 6, 2019PDF462612-1042±3 pp1,143IVR20

Western Canada

Manitoba

Polling firm Last date
of polling
Link LPC CPC NDP BQ GPC PPC[1] Other Margin
of error[2]
Sample
size[3]
Polling method[4] Lead
Probe ResearchSeptember 26, 2019PDF274119-931±3.1 pp1,000telephone14
Probe ResearchJune 17, 2019PDF244317-1321±3.1 pp1,000telephone19
Probe ResearchMarch 24, 2019PDF314217-731±3.1 pp1,000telephone11
Probe ResearchDecember 6, 2018PDF344216-521±2.9 pp1,105telephone8

Saskatchewan

Polling firm Last date
of polling
Link LPC CPC NDP BQ GPC PPC[1] Other Margin
of error[2]
Sample
size[3]
Polling method[4] Lead
U of SaskatchewanSeptember 2019HTML54111-81-±4.9 pp400telephone30

Alberta

Polling firm Last date
of polling
Link LPC CPC NDP BQ GPC PPC[1] Other Margin
of error[2]
Sample
size[3]
Polling method[4] Lead
Lethbridge CollegeOctober 10, 2019PDF17.964.09.7-4.11.92.4±3.17 pp953telephone46.1
Lethbridge CollegeFebruary 5, 2019PDF12.971.49.3-1.92.12.3±3.0 pp1,055telephone58.5

British Columbia

Polling firm Last date
of polling
Link LPC CPC NDP BQ GPC PPC[1] Other Margin
of error[2]
Sample
size[3]
Polling method[4] Lead
Insights WestOctober 16, 2019HTML202723-11-2±2.4 pp1670Online4
Insights WestSeptember 23, 2019HTML192914-14-3±3.3 pp867Online10
Insights WestSeptember 10, 2019HTML172914-13-4±3.4 pp869Online12

Leadership polls

Aside from conducting the usual opinion surveys on general party preferences, polling firms also survey public opinion on who would make the best Prime Minister:

February 2019–October 2019

Polling firm Last date
of polling
Link Justin Trudeau Andrew Scheer Jagmeet Singh Yves-François Blanchet Elizabeth May Maxime Bernier Unsure Margin
of error
[1]
Lead
Nanos ResearchSeptember 6, 2019PDF33.622.77.41.48.12.424.4±3.1 pp10.9
Nanos ResearchAugust 30, 2019PDF32.223.27.21.38.32.825.1±3.1 pp9.0
Nanos ResearchAugust 23, 2019PDF30.925.16.71.48.72.624.6±3.1 pp5.8
Nanos ResearchAugust 16, 2019PDF31.823.97.51.78.42.524.1±3.1 pp7.9
Nanos ResearchAugust 9, 2019PDF31.42571.88.51.924.3±3.1 pp6.4
Nanos ResearchAugust 2, 2019PDF33.824.46.81.89.21.622.3±3.1 pp9.4
Forum ResearchJuly 28, 2019PDF28287-14-23±3 pp0
Nanos ResearchJuly 26, 2019PDF32.524.17.72.59.11.622.4±3.1 pp8.4
LegerJuly 23, 2019PDF232479420±2.5 pp1
Nanos ResearchJuly 19, 2019PDF32.824.08.02.38.81.822.3±3.1 pp8.8
Abacus DataJuly 17, 2019HTML363113146±2.6 pp5
IpsosJuly 15, 2019HTML323613217±3.5 pp4
Campaign ResearchJuly 12, 2019HTML2420719321±2.3 pp4
Nanos ResearchJuly 12, 2019PDF32.923.18.91.87.92.223.2±3.1 pp9.8
Nanos ResearchJune 21, 2019PDF27.924.09.71.67.72.127.0±3.1 pp2.9
Nanos ResearchJune 14, 2019PDF27.024.99.91.59.41.825.6±2.3 pp2.1
Campaign ResearchJune 9, 2019HTML2424719417±2.6 pp0
Abacus DataJune 1, 2019HTML333012196±2.6 pp3
Nanos ResearchMay 31, 2019PDF26.526.78.91.79.61.624.9±3.1 pp0.2
Nanos ResearchMay 17, 2019PDF27.928.66.81.510.01.823.3±3.1 pp0.8
Abacus DataMay 3, 2019HTML343314146±1.5 pp1
LegerApril 22, 2019PDF202578321±2.5 pp5
LegerMarch 20, 2019PDF242587419±2.51 pp1
Nanos ResearchMarch 15, 2019PDF30.327.38.91.77.22.821.8±3.1 pp3.0
Abacus DataMarch 10, 2019HTML393110137±3.3 pp8
Campaign ResearchMarch 10, 2019HTML232471819±2.5 pp1
Abacus DataMarch 6, 2019HTML353313137±3.3 pp (final)2
Nanos ResearchMarch 1, 2019PDF35.225.06.21.87.32.122.5±3.1 pp10.2
Nanos ResearchFebruary 15, 2019PDF35.723.45.31.67.72.722.1±3.1 pp12.3
Campaign ResearchFebruary 11, 2019HTML282546117±2.5 pp3
Nanos ResearchFebruary 8, 2019PDF35.524.95.91.46.43.822.1±3.1 pp10.6

September 2018–February 2019

Polling firm Last date
of polling
Link Justin Trudeau Andrew Scheer Jagmeet Singh Mario Beaulieu Elizabeth May Maxime Bernier Unsure Margin
of error
[1]
Lead
Nanos ResearchFebruary 1, 2019PDF34.124.96.81.26.75.221.2±3.1 pp9.2
Nanos ResearchJanuary 25, 2019PDF33.526.17.51.26.74.920.1±3.1 pp7.4
Nanos ResearchJanuary 18, 2019PDF34.624.87.51.16.74.420.9±3.1 pp9.8
Nanos ResearchJanuary 11, 2019PDF36.423.96.81.36.24.520.9±3.1 pp12.5
Nanos ResearchJanuary 4, 2019PDF39.323.56.51.25.43.920.1±3.1 pp15.8
Nanos ResearchDecember 28, 2018PDF39.123.75.01.05.74.221.3±3.1 pp15.4
Nanos ResearchDecember 21, 2018PDF38.324.85.00.95.84.121.1±3.1 pp13.5
Abacus DataDecember 18, 2018HTML452910105±2.5 pp16
Angus ReidDecember 18, 2018HTML27336726±2.5 pp6
Nanos ResearchDecember 14, 2018PDF37.425.66.30.75.42.622.0±3.1 pp11.8
Campaign ResearchDecember 13, 2018HTML322251717±2.5 pp10
Nanos ResearchDecember 7, 2018PDF35.825.05.60.66.02.125.0±3.1 pp10.8
Nanos ResearchNovember 30, 2018PDF37.523.45.70.65.52.524.9±3.1 pp14.1
Forum ResearchNovember 29, 2018PDF33326822±3 pp1
Nanos ResearchNovember 23, 2018PDF38.221.95.80.95.72.325.2±3.1 pp16.3
LegerNovember 20, 2018PDF3322565±2.51 pp11
Nanos ResearchNovember 16, 2018PDF39.520.27.70.75.52.224.3±3.1 pp19.3
Campaign ResearchNovember 9, 2018HTML32226617±2.5 pp10
Nanos ResearchNovember 9, 2018PDF41.720.08.61.05.52.620.6±3.1 pp21.7
Nanos ResearchNovember 2, 2018PDF41.220.38.21.26.32.420.4±3.1 pp20.9
Nanos ResearchOctober 26, 2018PDF40.821.38.01.65.52.720.0±3.1 pp19.5
Nanos ResearchOctober 19, 2018PDF37.922.97.51.66.22.521.4±3.1 pp15.0
Nanos ResearchOctober 12, 2018PDF39.123.47.11.05.53.120.9±3.1 pp15.7
Innovative ResearchOctober 1, 2018HTML4729928n/a18
PollaraSeptember 20, 2018PDF39278521±3.1 pp12

August–September 2018

Polling firm Last date
of polling
Link Justin Trudeau Andrew Scheer Jagmeet Singh Mario Beaulieu Elizabeth May Margin
of error
[1]
Lead
Nanos ResearchSeptember 28, 2018PDF41.424.77.80.55.5±3.1 pp16.7
Nanos ResearchSeptember 21, 2018PDF43.125.07.50.85.6±3.1 pp18.1
PollaraSeptember 20, 2018HTML392785±3.1 pp12
Campaign ResearchSeptember 14, 2018HTML322255±2.5 pp10
Nanos ResearchAugust 31, 2018PDF42.224.36.81.06.4±3.1 pp17.9
Nanos ResearchAugust 24, 2018PDF40.125.47.71.35.2±3.1 pp14.7
Nanos ResearchAugust 17, 2018PDF39.625.28.21.24.6±3.1 pp14.4

October 2017–July 2018

Polling firm Last date
of polling
Link Justin Trudeau Andrew Scheer Jagmeet Singh Martine Ouellet Elizabeth May Margin
of error
[1]
Lead
Nanos ResearchJuly 27, 2018PDF40.424.56.51.25.8±3.1 pp15.9
Nanos ResearchJuly 20, 2018PDF40.525.26.31.35.9±3.1 pp15.3
Nanos ResearchJuly 6, 2018PDF42.624.47.10.96.0±3.1 pp18.2
Nanos ResearchJune 22, 2018PDF41.324.88.21.14.9±3.1 pp16.5
Nanos ResearchJune 15, 2018PDF38.725.48.80.84.3±3.1 pp13.3
Angus ReidJune 14, 2018PDF352276±3.1 pp13
Nanos ResearchJune 1, 2018PDF34.325.610.01.25.7±3.1 pp8.7
Nanos ResearchMay 25, 2018PDF36.025.29.31.36.4±3.1 pp10.8
Nanos ResearchMay 18, 2018PDF39.222.48.11.36.8±3.1 pp16.8
Nanos ResearchMay 11, 2018PDF39.620.98.10.97.7±3.1 pp18.7
Forum ResearchApril 20, 2018PDF24258312±2 pp1
Nanos ResearchMarch 23, 2018PDF38.526.58.91.94.9±3.1 pp12.0
Nanos ResearchMarch 16, 2018PDF37.525.99.02.45.7±3.1 pp11.6
Angus ReidMarch 15, 2018PDF26227±2 pp4
Nanos ResearchMarch 9, 2018PDF39.223.29.42.65.9±3.1 pp16.0
Nanos ResearchMarch 2, 2018PDF40.422.88.61.86.6±3.1 pp17.6
Nanos ResearchFebruary 23, 2018PDF40.422.19.51.95.6±3.1 pp18.3
Nanos ResearchFebruary 16, 2018PDF41.021.99.31.55.4±3.1 pp20.1
Campaign ResearchFebruary 10, 2018HTML3515725±2.1 pp20
Nanos ResearchJanuary 26, 2018PDF40.822.18.32.35.8±3.1 pp18.7
Nanos ResearchJanuary 12, 2018PDF42.722.38.11.85.2±3.1 pp20.4
Nanos ResearchJanuary 5, 2018PDF45.620.39.01.44.1±3.1 pp25.3
Nanos ResearchDecember 29, 2017PDF46.921.59.11.03.9±3.1 pp25.4
Nanos ResearchDecember 22, 2017PDF48.322.07.90.84.5±3.1 pp26.3
Nanos ResearchDecember 15, 2017PDF46.821.98.21.05.9±3.1 pp24.9
Forum ResearchDecember 14, 2017PDF30219510±3.1 pp9
Nanos ResearchDecember 8, 2017PDF45.423.58.01.36.4±3.1 pp21.9
Nanos ResearchDecember 1, 2017PDF45.622.86.62.06.1±3.1 pp22.8
Nanos ResearchNovember 24, 2017PDF44.122.87.21.65.3±3.1 pp21.3
Nanos ResearchNovember 17, 2017PDF44.822.47.71.64.8±3.1 pp22.4
Nanos ResearchNovember 10, 2017PDF45.021.18.81.45.2±3.1 pp23.9
Campaign ResearchNovember 9, 2017PDF3515755±2.2 pp20
Nanos ResearchNovember 3, 2017PDF43.821.08.51.95.4±3.1 pp22.8
Nanos ResearchOctober 27, 2017PDF44.320.89.22.35.5±3.1 pp23.5
Campaign ResearchOctober 11, 2017PDF3614615±2.2 pp22

October 2017

Polling firm Last date
of polling
Link Justin Trudeau Andrew Scheer Jagmeet Singh/
Thomas Mulcair
Martine Ouellet Elizabeth May Margin
of error
[1]
Lead
Nanos ResearchOctober 20, 2017PDF42.222.49.52.05.2±3.1 pp19.8
Nanos ResearchOctober 13, 2017PDF41.922.58.71.65.3±3.1 pp19.4
Nanos ResearchOctober 6, 2017PDF43.921.79.31.24.0±3.1 pp22.2

June–September 2017

Polling firm Last date
of polling
Link Justin Trudeau Andrew Scheer Thomas Mulcair Martine Ouellet Elizabeth May Margin
of error
[1]
Lead
Nanos ResearchSeptember 29, 2017PDF43.920.39.71.34.0±3.1 pp23.6
Nanos ResearchSeptember 22, 2017PDF45.321.29.41.54.3±3.1 pp24.1
Nanos ResearchSeptember 15, 2017PDF46.319.710.11.54.1±3.1 pp26.6
Forum ResearchSeptember 14, 2017PDF34201245±3 pp14
Campaign ResearchSeptember 11, 2017HTML4213826±2.3 pp29
Nanos ResearchSeptember 8, 2017PDF47.819.79.71.33.7±3.1 pp28.1
Nanos ResearchSeptember 1, 2017PDF46.221.79.81.64.0±3.1 pp24.5
Nanos ResearchAugust 25, 2017PDF48.020.49.01.34.3±3.1 pp27.6
Nanos ResearchAugust 18, 2017PDF47.521.68.41.14.4±3.1 pp25.9
Forum ResearchAugust 17, 2017PDF39181028±3 pp21
Nanos ResearchAugust 11, 2017PDF47.121.39.21.44.9±3.1 pp25.8
Nanos ResearchAugust 4, 2017PDF46.121.89.81.75.1±3.1 pp24.3
Nanos ResearchJuly 28, 2017PDF44.021.59.71.66.0±3.1 pp22.5
Nanos ResearchJuly 21, 2017PDF45.420.810.11.45.5±3.1 pp24.6
Nanos ResearchJuly 14, 2017PDF43.921.99.81.45.5±3.1 pp22.0
Campaign ResearchJuly 10, 2017HTML3817814±2 pp21
Nanos ResearchJuly 7, 2017PDF45.621.48.10.75.4±3.1 pp24.2
Nanos ResearchJune 30, 2017PDF46.921.57.91.14.0±3.1 pp25.4
Nanos ResearchJune 23, 2017PDF46.321.28.41.04.5±3.1 pp25.1
Angus ReidJune 12, 2017HTML371910±2 pp18
Forum ResearchJune 8, 2017PDF3920938±3 pp19

June 2017

Polling firm Last date
of polling
Link Justin Trudeau Rona Ambrose/
Andrew Scheer
Thomas Mulcair Martine Ouellet Elizabeth May Margin
of error
[1]
Lead
Nanos ResearchJune 16, 2017PDF45.819.88.51.25.3±3.1 pp26.0
Nanos ResearchJune 9, 2017PDF43.619.29.11.35.3±3.1 pp24.4
Nanos ResearchJune 2, 2017PDF45.918.58.91.55.1±3.1 pp27.4

April–May 2017

Polling firm Last date
of polling
Link Justin Trudeau Rona Ambrose Thomas Mulcair Martine Ouellet Elizabeth May Margin
of error
[1]
Lead
Nanos ResearchMay 26, 2017PDF45.718.49.10.24.9±3.1 pp27.3
Nanos ResearchMay 19, 2017PDF46.318.49.21.95.2±3.1 pp27.9
Nanos ResearchMay 12, 2017PDF47.819.410.32.05.4±3.1 pp28.4
Nanos ResearchMay 5, 2017PDF46.918.710.72.05.4±3.1 pp28.2
Nanos ResearchApril 28, 2017PDF48.218.49.41.65.4±3.1 pp29.8
Forum ResearchApril 24, 2017PDF32121028±3 pp20
Nanos ResearchApril 21, 2017PDF47.818.69.20.25.1±3.1 pp29.2
Nanos ResearchApril 13, 2017PDF46.519.48.71.75.3±3.1 pp27.1

March–April 2017

Polling firm Last date
of polling
Link Justin Trudeau Rona Ambrose Thomas Mulcair Rhéal Fortin/
Martine Ouellet
Elizabeth May Margin
of error
[1]
Lead
Nanos ResearchApril 7, 2017PDF47.019.310.51.34.6±3.1 pp27.7
Nanos ResearchMarch 31, 2017PDF47.218.111.61.54.9±3.1 pp29.1
Nanos ResearchMarch 24, 2017PDF48.718.110.70.95.0±3.1 pp30.6

December 2015–March 2017

Polling firm Last date
of polling
Link Justin Trudeau Rona Ambrose Thomas Mulcair Rhéal Fortin Elizabeth May Margin
of error
[1]
Lead
Nanos ResearchMarch 17, 2017PDF49.717.310.60.84.3±3.1 pp32.4
Nanos ResearchMarch 10, 2017PDF48.717.010.80.84.9±3.1 pp31.7
Nanos ResearchMarch 3, 2017PDF47.017.410.20.95.2±3.1 pp29.6
Nanos ResearchFebruary 24, 2017PDF46.318.39.90.94.9±3.1 pp28.0
Nanos ResearchFebruary 17, 2017PDF46.117.310.91.24.9±3.1 pp28.8
Nanos ResearchFebruary 10, 2017PDF46.419.19.61.04.9±3.1 pp27.3
Campaign ResearchFebruary 6, 2017HTML311411±3 pp17
Nanos ResearchFebruary 3, 2017PDF45.420.010.21.25.5±3.1 pp25.4
Nanos ResearchJanuary 27, 2017PDF46.719.910.71.14.7±3.1 pp26.8
Forum ResearchJanuary 21, 2017PDF3811926±3 pp27
Nanos ResearchJanuary 20, 2017PDF46.620.310.20.95.1±3.1 pp26.3
Nanos ResearchJanuary 13, 2017PDF46.718.811.10.85.1±3.1 pp27.9
Nanos ResearchJanuary 6, 2017PDF49.318.110.00.54.0±3.1 pp31.2
Nanos ResearchDecember 30, 2016PDF49.017.79.60.84.7±3.1 pp31.3
Nanos ResearchDecember 23, 2016PDF50.617.18.80.94.6±3.1 pp33.5
Nanos ResearchDecember 9, 2016PDF54.115.87.41.05.4±3.1 pp38.3
Nanos ResearchDecember 2, 2016PDF54.015.58.51.15.3±3.1 pp38.5
Forum ResearchDecember 7, 2016PDF40141226±3 pp26
Nanos ResearchNovember 25, 2016PDF54.215.78.70.75.5±3.1 pp38.5
Nanos ResearchNovember 18, 2016PDF52.217.18.30.55.3±3.1 pp35.1
Nanos ResearchNovember 11, 2016PDF50.316.78.70.75.5±3.1 pp33.6
Nanos ResearchNovember 4, 2016PDF49.516.28.30.55.6±3.1 pp33.3
Nanos ResearchOctober 28, 2016PDF49.616.08.20.55.7±3.1 pp33.6
Nanos ResearchOctober 21, 2016PDF50.414.68.40.66.1±3.1 pp35.8
Nanos ResearchOctober 14, 2016PDF52.214.78.60.75.4±3.1 pp37.6
Nanos ResearchOctober 7, 2016PDF55.914.57.70.64.5±3.1 pp41.4
Nanos ResearchSeptember 30, 2016PDF56.014.17.40.64.4±3.1 pp41.9
Nanos ResearchSeptember 23, 2016PDF55.915.07.91.13.8±3.1 pp40.9
Forum ResearchSeptember 21, 2016PDF4413827±3 pp31
Nanos ResearchSeptember 16, 2016PDF53.915.68.31.33.7±3.1 pp38.3
Nanos ResearchSeptember 9, 2016PDF53.716.78.01.53.8±3.1 pp37.0
Forum ResearchSeptember 7, 2016PDF4613817±3 pp33
Nanos ResearchSeptember 2, 2016PDF54.116.57.91.83.6±3.1 pp37.6
Nanos ResearchAugust 26, 2016PDF54.416.79.31.53.6±3.1 pp37.7
Nanos ResearchAugust 19, 2016PDF56.316.39.01.23.3±3.1 pp40.0
Nanos ResearchAugust 12, 2016PDF55.614.59.21.34.3±3.1 pp41.1
Forum ResearchAugust 6, 2016PDF5012817±3.0 pp38
Nanos ResearchAugust 5, 2016PDF55.415.19.21.04.6±3.1 pp40.3
Nanos ResearchJuly 29, 2016PDF54.114.99.20.64.9±3.1 pp39.2
Nanos ResearchJuly 22, 2016PDF52.315.99.20.54.9±3.1 pp36.4
Nanos ResearchJuly 15, 2016PDF52.717.09.00.24.4±3.1 pp35.7
Nanos ResearchJuly 8, 2016PDF52.316.79.80.74.1±3.1 pp35.6
Forum ResearchJuly 5, 2016PDF4913917±2 pp36
Nanos ResearchJune 30, 2016PDF52.517.68.51.34.9±3.1 pp34.9
Nanos ResearchJune 24, 2016PDF53.415.98.81.55.2±3.1 pp37.5
Nanos ResearchJune 17, 2016PDF53.615.18.31.45.0±3.1 pp38.5
Nanos ResearchJune 10, 2016PDF52.615.88.01.35.0±3.1 pp36.8
Forum ResearchJune 7, 2016PDF4511926±2 pp34
Nanos ResearchJune 3, 2016PDF53.514.58.61.04.3±3.1 pp39
Nanos ResearchMay 27, 2016PDF53.715.58.21.03.8±3.1 pp38.2
Nanos ResearchMay 20, 2016PDF53.815.69.01.23.6±3.1 pp38.2
Nanos ResearchMay 13, 2016PDF53.015.810.11.33.4±3.1 pp37.2
Forum ResearchMay 11, 2016PDF47131026±3 pp34
Nanos ResearchMay 6, 2016PDF51.915.310.31.25.3±3.1 pp36.6
Nanos ResearchApril 29, 2016PDF51.615.210.70.85.8±3.1 pp36.4
Nanos ResearchApril 22, 2016PDF50.416.710.60.75.8±3.1 pp33.7
Nanos ResearchApril 15, 2016PDF51.116.69.70.56.0±3.1 pp34.5
Nanos ResearchApril 8, 2016PDF52.316.910.60.54.2±3.1 pp35.4
Forum ResearchApril 5, 2016PDF47111017±3 pp36
Nanos ResearchApril 1, 2016PDF51.317.511.60.83.3±3.1 pp33.8
Innovative ResearchMarch 30, 2016PDF60.021.012.01.06.0n/a39.0
Nanos ResearchMarch 24, 2016PDF51.417.011.61.13.9±3.1 pp34.4
Nanos ResearchMarch 18, 2016PDF52.814.912.70.64.4±3.1 pp37.9
Forum ResearchMarch 15, 2016PDF43131015±2 pp30
Nanos ResearchMarch 11, 2016PDF52.714.612.80.74.7±3.1 pp38.1
Nanos ResearchMarch 4, 2016PDF53.714.211.30.95.3±3.1 pp39.5
Nanos ResearchFebruary 26, 2016PDF53.513.910.90.95.0±3.1 pp39.6
Nanos ResearchFebruary 19, 2016PDF51.414.911.41.04.8±3.1 pp36.5
Forum ResearchFebruary 17, 2016PDF4712817±3 pp35
Nanos ResearchFebruary 12, 2016PDF51.415.110.71.04.4±3.1 pp36.3
LegerFebruary 9, 2016PDF409104±2.1 pp30
Nanos ResearchFebruary 5, 2016PDF51.014.812.20.94.1±3.1 pp36.2
Nanos ResearchJanuary 29, 2016PDF50.014.913.00.74.4±3.1 pp35.1
Nanos ResearchJanuary 22, 2016PDF52.214.611.50.93.5±3.1 pp37.6
Nanos ResearchJanuary 15, 2016PDF53.513.710.61.04.5±3.1 pp39.8
Nanos ResearchJanuary 8, 2016PDF53.213.210.31.14.2±3.1 pp40.0
Nanos ResearchJanuary 2, 2016PDF52.612.111.61.24.8±3.1 pp40.5
Nanos ResearchDecember 25, 2015PDF53.111.312.71.25.1±3.1 pp40.4
Nanos ResearchDecember 18, 2015PDF50.212.913.01.35.1±3.1 pp37.2
Nanos ResearchDecember 11, 2015PDF51.513.712.81.25.0±3.1 pp37.8
Nanos ResearchDecember 4, 2015PDF53.713.712.01.44.2±3.1 pp40.0

November 2015

Polling firm Last date
of polling
Link Justin Trudeau Stephen Harper/
Rona Ambrose
Thomas Mulcair Rhéal Fortin Elizabeth May Margin
of error
[1]
Lead
Nanos ResearchNovember 27, 2015PDF50.916.312.31.64.8±3.1 pp34.6
Nanos ResearchNovember 20, 2015PDF53.317.211.61.24.6±3.1 pp36.1
Nanos ResearchNovember 13, 2015PDF50.918.413.01.35.0±3.1 pp32.5

See also

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.