CRST Van Expedited, Inc. v. EEOC

CRST Van Expedited, Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 578 U.S. ___ (2016), was a United States Supreme Court case regarding whether a prevailing party must succeed on the merits to seek attorney's fees. In a unanimous decision authored by Associate Justice Anthony Kennedy, the Court held that a defendant need not succeed on the merits in order to be the prevailing party for the purposes of seeking attorney fees.[1]

CRST Van Expedited, Inc. v. EEOC
Argued March 28, 2016
Decided May 19, 2016
Full case nameCRST Van Expedited, Inc., Petitioner v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Docket no.14-1375
Citations578 U.S. ___ (more)
136 S. Ct. 1642; 194 L. Ed. 2d 707
Court membership
Chief Justice
John Roberts
Associate Justices
Anthony Kennedy · Clarence Thomas
Ruth Bader Ginsburg · Stephen Breyer
Samuel Alito · Sonia Sotomayor
Elena Kagan
Case opinions
MajorityKennedy, joined by unanimous
ConcurrenceThomas

References

  1. "CRST Van Expedited, Inc. v. EEOC, Slip opinion" (PDF). 2016-05-19. Retrieved 2016-05-24.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.