2009 reasons of the Supreme Court of Canada

The table below lists the decisions (known as reasons) delivered from the bench by the Supreme Court of Canada during 2009. The table illustrates what reasons were filed by each justice in each case, and which justices joined each reason. This list, however, does not include reasons on motions.[1]

Reasons

  Delivered the Court's reason
  Joined the Court's reason
  Filed a concurrence
  Joined a concurrence
  Filed a dissent
  Joined a dissent
  Filed a concurrence/dissent
  Joined a concurrence/dissent
  Did not participate in the judgment
  Not a member of the Court at the time of hearing or delivering
  • Decisions that do not note a Justice delivering the Court's reason are per coram.
  • Multiple concurrences and dissents within a case are numbered, with joining votes numbered accordingly. Justices occasionally join multiple reasons in a single case; each vote is subdivided accordingly.
  • Multiple unnumbered reasons are jointly written or delivered.
  • Decisions that are given orally from the bench are denoted by a "V"; per coram decisions delivered orally from the bench only note a "V" on the most senior justice on the panel.
  • An asterisk ( * ) in the Court's opinion denotes that it was only a majority in part or a plurality.
Case name Argued Decided McLachlin Binnie LeBel Deschamps Fish Abella Charron Rothstein Cromwell
Lipson v Canada, 2009 SCC 1, [2009] 1 S.C.R. 3 April 23, 2009 January 8, 2009 1 1 2
R v Strecko, 2009 SCC 2, [2009] 1 S.C.R. 64 January 14, 2009 V
R v McNeil, 2009 SCC 3, [2009] 1 S.C.R. 66 March 19, 2008 January 16, 2009
R v Khela, 2009 SCC 4, [2009] 1 S.C.R. 104 March 28, 2008 January 22, 2009
R v Smith, 2009 SCC 5, [2009] 1 S.C.R. 146 March 28, 2008 January 22, 2009
Shafron v KRG Insurance Brokers (Western) Inc, 2009 SCC 6, [2009] 1 S.C.R. 157 October 16, 2008 January 23, 2009
Ravndahl v Saskatchewan, 2009 SCC 7, [2009] 1 S.C.R. 181 December 17, 2008 January 29, 2009
DesRochers v Canada (Industry), 2009 SCC 8, [2009] 1 S.C.R. 194 May 20, 2008 February 5, 2009
Ermineskin Indian Band and Nation v Canada, 2009 SCC 9, [2009] 1 S.C.R. 222 May 22, 2008 February 13, 2009
Rick v Brandsema, 2009 SCC 10, [2009] 1 S.C.R. 295 October 14, 2008 February 19, 2009
Case name Argued Decided McLachlin Binnie LeBel Deschamps Fish Abella Charron Rothstein Cromwell
Teck Cominco Metals Ltd v Lloyd's Underwriters, 2009 SCC 11, [2009] 1 S.C.R. 321 November 17, 2008 February 20, 2009
Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) v Khosa, 2009 SCC 12, [2009] 1 S.C.R. 339 March 20, 2008 February 6, 2009 1 2
R v Royz, 2009 SCC 13 March 25, 2009 V
R v SJL, 2009 SCC 13 December 16, 2008 March 27, 2009
BMP Global Distribution Inc v Bank of Nova Scotia, 2009 SCC 15, [2009] 1 S.C.R. 504 May 15, 2008 April 2, 2009
Canada Post Corp v Lépine, 2009 SCC 16, [2009] 1 S.C.R. 549 November 17, 2008 April 2, 2009
R v Patrick, 2009 SCC 17, [2009] 1 S.C.R. 579 October 10, 2008 April 9, 2009
Chatterjee v Ontario (AG), 2009 SCC 19, [2009] 1 S.C.R. 624 November 12, 2008 April 17, 2009
United Parcel Service Canada Ltd v Canada, 2009 SCC 20, [2009] 1 S.C.R. 657 January 15, 2009 April 23, 2009
R v Middleton, 2009 SCC 21, [2009] 1 S.C.R. 674 January 20, 2009 May 22, 2009
Case name Argued Decided McLachlin Binnie LeBel Deschamps Fish Abella Charron Rothstein Cromwell
R v Van, 2009 SCC 22, [2009] 1 S.C.R. 716 January 13, 2009 May 28, 2009
R v Craig, 2009 SCC 23, [2009] 1 S.C.R. 762 November 13, 2009 May 29, 2009
R v Ouellette, 2009 SCC 24, [2009] 1 S.C.R. 818 November 13, 2009 May 29, 2009 1 2 1
R v Nguyen, 2009 SCC 25, [2009] 1 S.C.R. 826 November 13, 2009 May 29, 2009
R v Godin, 2009 SCC 26, [2009] 2 S.C.R. 3 February 12, 2009 June 4, 2009
R v Ellard, 2009 SCC 27, [2009] 2 S.C.R. 19 April 20, 2009 June 12, 2009
R v Griffin, 2009 SCC 28, [2009] 2 S.C.R. 42 November 14, 2008 June 18, 2009 1 2
Caisse populaire Desjardins de l'Est de Drummond v Canada, 2009 SCC 29, [2009] 2 S.C.R. 94 February 29, 2008 June 19, 2009
AC v Manitoba (Director of Child and Family Services), 2009 SCC 30, [2009] 2 S.C.R. 181 May 20, 2008 June 26, 2009
Greater Vancouver Transportation Authority v Canadian Federation of Students — British Columbia Component, 2009 SCC 31, [2009] 2 S.C.R. 295 March 25, 2008 July 10, 2009
Case name Argued Decided McLachlin Binnie LeBel Deschamps Fish Abella Charron Rothstein Cromwell
R v Grant, 2009 SCC 32, [2009] 2 S.C.R. 353 April 24, 2008 July 17, 2009
R v Suberu, 2009 SCC 33, [2009] 2 S.C.R. 460 April 15, 2008 July 17, 2009
R v Harrison, 2009 SCC 34, [2009] 2 S.C.R. 494 December 9, 2008 July 17, 2009
R v Shepherd, 2009 SCC 35, [2009] 2 S.C.R. 527 April 24, 2008 July 17, 2009
R v Layton, 2009 SCC 36, [2009] 2 S.C.R. 540 April 21, 2009 July 23, 2009
Alberta v Hutterian Brethren of Wilson Colony, 2009 SCC 37, [2009] 2 S.C.R. 567 October 7, 2008 July 23, 2009 1 2 3
R v Bjelland, 2009 SCC 38, [2009] 2 S.C.R. 651 November 20, 2008 July 30, 2009
Nolan v Kerry (Canada) Inc, 2009 SCC 39, [2009] 2 S.C.R. 678 November 18, 2008 August 7, 2009
Bell Canada v Bell Aliant Regional Communications, 2009 SCC 40, [2009] 2 S.C.R. 764 March 16, 2009 September 18, 2009
United States of America v Anekwu, 2009 SCC 41, [2009] 3 S.C.R. 3 February 10, 2009 September 24, 2009
Case name Argued Decided McLachlin Binnie LeBel Deschamps Fish Abella Charron Rothstein Cromwell
R v Jaw, 2009 SCC 42, [2009] 3 S.C.R. 26 January 13, 2009 September 25, 2009
Marcotte v Longueuil (City), 2009 SCC 43, [2009] 3 S.C.R. 65 January 19, 2009 October 8, 2009
Breslaw v Montreal (City), 2009 SCC 44, [2009] 3 S.C.R. 131 January 19, 2009 October 8, 2009
R v Last, 2009 SCC 45, [2009] 3 S.C.R. 146 March 27, 2009 October 15, 2009
Canada (Justice) v Fischbacher, 2009 SCC 46, [2009] 3 S.C.R. 170 June 16, 2009 October 16, 2009
Nguyen v Quebec (Education, Recreation and Sports), 2009 SCC 47, [2009] 3 S.C.R. 208 December 15, 2008 October 22, 2009
Galambos v Perez, 2009 SCC 48, [2009] 3 S.C.R. 247 April 15, 2009 October 23, 2009
Quebec (Revenue) v Caisse populaire Desjardins de Montmagny, 2009 SCC 49, [2009] 3 S.C.R. 286 March 17, 2009 October 30, 2009
Northrop Grumman Overseas Services Corp v Canada (AG), 2009 SCC 50, [2009] 3 S.C.R. 309 May 19, 2009 November 5, 2009
Miazga v Kvello Estate, 2009 SCC 51, [2009] 3 S.C.R. 339 December 12, 2008 November 6, 2009
Case name Argued Decided McLachlin Binnie LeBel Deschamps Fish Abella Charron Rothstein Cromwell
R v Basi, 2009 SCC 52, [2009] 3 S.C.R. 389 April 22, 2009 November 19, 2009
Consolidated Fastfrate Inc v Western Canada Council of Teamsters, 2009 SCC 53, [2009] 3 S.C.R. 407 February 19, 2009 November 26, 2009
Plourde v Wal‑Mart Canada Corp, 2009 SCC 54, [2009] 3 S.C.R. 465 January 21, 2009 November 27, 2009
Desbiens v Wal‑Mart Canada Corp, 2009 SCC 55, [2009] 3 S.C.R. 540 January 21, 2009 November 27, 2009
R v Legare, 2009 SCC 56, [2009] 3 S.C.R. 551 October 15, 2009 December 3, 2009
R v Burke, 2009 SCC 57, [2009] 3 S.C.R. 566 November 19, 2009 December 4, 2009
R v Dudley, 2009 SCC 58, [2009] 3 S.C.R. 570 March 18, 2009 December 17, 2009
Co‑operators Life Insurance Co v Gibbens, 2009 SCC 59, [2009] 3 S.C.R. 605 April 16, 2009 December 18, 2009
R v Bird, 2009 SCC 60, [2009] 3 S.C.R. 638 December 11, 2009 December 18, 2009
Grant v Torstar Corp, 2009 SCC 61, [2009] 3 S.C.R. 640 April 23, 2009 December 22, 2009
Case name Argued Decided McLachlin Binnie LeBel Deschamps Fish Abella Charron Rothstein Cromwell
Quan v Cusson, 2009 SCC 62, [2009] 3 S.C.R. 712 April 23, 2009 December 22, 2009

Notes

  1. Motions released in 2009: R. v. Laboucan, 2009 SCC 18, [2009] 1 S.C.R. 620

References

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.