Williams v. Pennsylvania
Williams v. Pennsylvania | |
---|---|
| |
Argued February 29, 2016 Decided June 9, 2016 | |
Full case name | Terrance Williams, Petitioner v. Pennsylvania |
Docket nos. | 15–5040 |
Citations | 579 U.S. ___ (more) |
Opinion announcement | Opinion announcement |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Kennedy, joined by Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan |
Dissent | Roberts, joined by Alito |
Dissent | Thomas |
Laws applied | |
U.S. Const. amends. VIII, XIV |
Williams v. Pennsylvania, 579 U.S. ___ (2016), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a prosecutor involved in seeking the death penalty for a defendant should recuse himself if asked to judge an appeal in the capital case.[1][2]
Background
Terrance Williams was convicted and sentenced to death for the murder and robbery of Amos Norwood and then appealed to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. The Chief Justice of the state court by that point was Ronald Castille, who had been the local District Attorney of Philadelphia throughout Williams’ trial, sentencing, and appeal, and who had personally authorized his office to seek the death penalty in this case. The attorneys for Williams asked the justice to recuse himself but Castille refused.
Opinion of the Court
Associate Justice Anthony Kennedy authored the majority opinion.[2]
References
- ↑ SCOTUSblog coverage
- 1 2 Williams v. Pennsylvania, No. 15–5040, 579 U.S. ____ (2016).
External links
- Slip opinion from the U.S. Supreme Court
- SCOTUSblog coverage
- Oyez.org coverage