Undue burden standard

Constitutional Law of the United States
Overview
Articles Amendments History Judicial review
Principles
Separation of powers Individual rights Rule of law Federalism Republicanism
Government structure
Legislative branch Executive branch Judicial branch State government Local government
Individual rights
Freedom of religion Freedom of speech Freedom of the press Freedom of assembly Right to petition Freedom of association Right to keep and bear arms Right to trial by jury Criminal procedural rights Right to privacy Freedom from slavery Due process Equal protection Citizenship Voting rights
Theory
Living Constitution Originalism Purposivism Textualism Strict constructionism

References to an undue burden standard are a shorthand to a collection of similar-sounding, but legally distinct, standards invoked in various areas of United States constitutional law. One version of an "undue burden" test was once widely used during the Lochner era of jurisprudence, in which courts invoked the concept of economic freedom to invalidate statutes. It is widely understood in the legal community that this era came to an end following President Franklin D. Roosevelt's 'court packing plan.'

Some areas of United States constitutional jurisprudence use tests described using terms like "undue burden," though the tests themselves exist in distinct areas of the law. The two most notable areas to use such tests are the areas of the Dormant Commerce Clause (e.g. United States v. Lopez, 1994) and abortion (e.g. Planned Parenthood v. Casey, 1992).

Some advocates have described the undue burden standard as "a 'middle way' forward" for Constitutional analysis, between the strict scrutiny and the rational basis tests.^[1]

Notes