UAAP Final Four

The UAAP Final Four refers to the postseasons of the University Athletic Association of the Philippines (UAAP) tournaments. The term "final four" came from the National Collegiate Athletic Association of the United States' men's Division I basketball tournament which is colloquially called as the "final four".

History

The Final Four in which the four teams (out of eight) with the best records qualify for the postseason playoff games was instituted in Season 56 (199394). Previously the postseason was a championship series between the top two teams, with the #1 seeded team holding the twice to beat advantage, i.e., they have to win only once to clinch the championship. The #2 team has to win twice.

The tournament is now conducted in three stages with the institution of the Final Four playoffs:

  • The two-round eliminations, where a team plays the other teams twice. The four teams with the worst records are eliminated.
  • The semifinals, wherein the #1 seeded team plays the 4th seeded team and the #2 seeded team plays the 3rd seeded team. Both #1 and #2 seeded teams possess the twice to beat advantage, while the #3 and #4 teams have to win twice.
  • The finals, which is a best of three series.

On the first year of the implementation of the Final Four playoffs, the University of Santo Tomas swept the elimination round, and following the then existing rules, the Glowing Goldies were awarded the championship outright. After that season, the UAAP revised the rule so that the team that sweeps the elimination round will instead advance to the best-of-3 Finals automatically. While the #2 team will have the twice to beat advantage in the semifinals where it awaits the winner of the game between the #3 and #4 teams.[1]

The revised postseason format was implemented in Season 57 (1994–95) but it was not until Season 70 (2007–08) that a team swept the elimination rounds. The University of the East was the first to accomplish this feat under the new format, causing the sweep clause to be used. UE thus automatically advanced to the Finals but this reward became a bane as the Red Warriors had to wait for 21 days before the championship series can be started due to several factors, namely, the unavailability of the playing venue (Araneta Coliseum), two tie-breaker games and two semifinal games. The Red Warriors became rusty, so to speak, causing them to lose the championship series 20 against La Salle (their last elimination round opponent). As a result, the Policy Board formulated the "bonus rule" in which the team that sweeps the elimination rounds will qualify for the Finals outright and will have a thrice-to-beat advantage. This means that the number 1 seeded team will only need to win twice; the other finalist needs to win thrice, thus giving the sweeper a 1–0 lead in a virtual best-of-five.[2]

Ties among the semifinalists were broken by an extra game, irrespective of the seedings. Ergo, in a tie for the 2nd seed, the game that will be used to break the tie serves as a de facto game one of a best-of-three series. If two teams are tied for the fourth seed, the game that will be used to break the tie serves as a knockout game between the two. If three or more teams are tied, the team with the best points difference gets a bye to the final tie-breaker game against the winner/s of the teams with the lower points difference. In Season 72 (200910), the league introduced the "common sense" rule in determining seedings for the playoffs in case of ties.[3]This means not all ties in the semifinals will be broken by a one-game playoff. Only ties for second and fourth are broken by an extra game. Ties for first and third are broken by the points difference of the tied teams. Starting Season 79, however, the thrice-to-beat advantage for the top-seeded team (for cases of the double elimination round sweep) has been removed, but the stepladder semifinals format (second-seeded team still with the twice-to-beat advantage against the 2 lower-seeded teams in the Final Four) and the automatic Finals slot incentive for the top-seeded team remains.

Format

  • Regular Final Four Round - If no team sweeps the elimination round:
    • Seeds #1 and #2 teams possess the twice-to-beat advantage
    • Team #1 meets #4 while #2 meets #3 in the semifinals.
    • The semifinal winners advance to the Finals.
    • The team that wins 2 games in the Finals wins the championship.
  • Stepladder Final Four Format - If a team sweeps the elimination round:
    • Seed #1 advance to the Finals. From 2007 to 2016, seed #1 earns a thrice-to-beat advantage (or a 1−0 incentive lead in a best-of-five Finals series).
    • Seed #2 advance to the semifinals with the twice-to-beat advantage.
    • Teams #3 and #4 face off to meet #2 in the semifinals in a one-game playoff.
    • In the finals, the #1 seed only has to win twice, while the other opponent has to win thrice.
  • In case of two teams being tied, an extra game will be played to determine which seed they will possess.
  • In case of three or more teams being tied, the team with the best head-to-head record usually possesses the best seeding, while the other teams will play an extra game to determine the second-best seeding,

Results

Television and radio

The Final Four is heavily covered by the media. With the UAAP as one of the leading collegiate leagues in the country, the Final Four games are broadcast live throughout the country.

Beginning year 2000, the UAAP Finals and the Final Four games, were broadcast by ABS-CBN's UHF channel Studio 23 nationwide and produced by ABS-CBN Sports. Prior to Studio 23, the games were broadcast by Silverstar Sports on the state-controlled People's Television VHF channel 4. Since July 2009, the UAAP is also aired in high definition through cable channel Balls, via their channel Balls HD. Upon signing a new contract at the conclusion of UAAP Season 72 in October 2009, the Finals will be aired through VHF television channel ABS-CBN 2, beginning in 2010 and renewed again in October 2013 at the conclusion of UAAP Season 76.

Prior to 2001, the games were also aired live on DZSR Sports Radio 918-AM; after ABS-CBN's takeover of broadcast rights, its Manila FM station 101.9 For Life! aired updates during and after the games, but not blow-by-blow coverages. In 2010, radio coverage of the games were aired on DZRJ-AM 810.

Statistics

Appearances

TeamSemifinal
appearances
Last semis
appearance
First semis
appearance
Finals
appearances
Highest
seed
 Adamson520172006-2nd
 Ateneo1820171999111st
 La Salle2020171994161st
 FEU1920171994101st
 NU52015200111st
 UE122009199421st
 UP219971996-3rd
 UST152015199481st

Notes:

  • Number of appearance excludes 4th seed elimination games.

Best performances

Champion
Runner-up
Semifinalist, lost with twice to beat advantage
Semifinalist, lost with twice to win disadvantage
Lost in 4th-seed playoff
Suspended
Not in the league
1Semifinals seed
xDid not Qualify
sGame was forfeited.
  • Number denotes playoff seeding.
  • Shade denotes final position.
School94959697989900010203040506070809101112131415 1617
 Adamson xxxxxxxxxxx4xxx32xxxx43
 Ateneo xxxxx32231331311211x13 21
 La Salle 12131111142222x4x423x 12
 FEU 44x12433x211xx3213x32234
 NU xxxxxxx4xxxxxxxxxx3144 xx
 UE 234x3xxx23442143xxxxxx xx
 UP xx34xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xx
 UST 3122424x4xxx34x4x424x1 xx

Win-loss statistics

Entire playoffs

TeamPldWLPCT
 La Salle7245270.625
 Ateneo5631250.554
 UST4827210.563
 FEU5727300.474
 NU12660.500
 UE264220.182
 UP4130.250
 Adamson7070.000
  • *arranged by number of wins

Series statistics

TeamPldWLPCT
 La Salle3624120.667
 Ateneo3019110.633
 FEU2914150.483
 UST2312110.522
 NU6240.333
 UE131120.077
 UP2020.000
 Adamson5050.000
  • *arranged by number of wins

Finals

TeamPldWLPCT
 Ateneo11740.636
 La Salle16790.438
 FEU10550.500
 UST8440.500
 NU1101.000
 UE2020.000
 Adamson0------
 UP0------

Finals statistics

  • Most lopsided game: La Salle 72–47 FEU, 1998 Game 1 (25 points)
  • Closest game: Several games, all one-point leads:
    • UST 73–72 La Salle, 2013 Game 1
    • La Salle 64–63 UE, 2007 Game 1
    • Ateneo 73–72 UST, 2006 Game 1
    • FEU 65–64 La Salle, 1997 Game 2 (championship clincher)
    • UST 77–76 La Salle, 1994 Game 3
  • Finals appearances: La Salle, 16
  • Consecutive finals appearances: La Salle, 9 (1994–2002)
  • Championships: Ateneo (2002, 2008–12, 2017), La Salle (1998–2001, 2007, 2013, 2016), 7; UST (1993–96, 2006; including UST's 1993 sweep), FEU (1997, 2003–05, 2015), 5

Note: FEU was awarded the 2004 championship title due to La Salle's fielding of ineligible players from 2003 to 2005 thus forfeiting their wins and revoking La Salle's final team standings from those seasons.

  • Consecutive championships: Ateneo (2008–12), 5; UST (1993–96), and La Salle (1998–2001), 4; FEU (2003–05), 3
  • As of 2016, the winner of Game 1 won the championship 17 times out of 24 (71%).

Semifinals statistics

  • Most lopsided game: La Salle vs NU, 111–85, 2001 (26 points)
  • Closest game: Several games, all one-point wins.
    • UP 70–69 FEU, 1997 Game 1 (1 point)
    • FEU 70–69 UP, 1997 Game 2 (1 point)
    • UST 75–74 Ateneo, 1999 (1 point)
    • FEU 61–60 Ateneo, 2000 Game 1 (1 point)
    • UST 82–81 UE, 2006 Game 2 (1 point)
    • FEU 62–61 Ateneo, 2016 Game 1 (1 point)
    • Ateneo 69–68 FEU (OT), 2016 Game 2 (1 point)
  • Semifinal appearances: La Salle, 20 (1994–2005, 2007–08, 2010, 2012–14, 2016–17)
  • Consecutive semifinal appearances: Ateneo (1999–2012), 14

Most frequent matchups

The most frequently played matchups are:

MatchupSemifinalsFinalsTotal
FEU vs. La Salle6511
Ateneo vs. La Salle5510
La Salle vs. UST459
Ateneo vs. FEU538
Ateneo vs. UST426
FEU vs. UE505
Ateneo vs. UE213
La Salle vs. UE213
UST vs. NU303
FEU vs. UST112
Ateneo vs. Adamson202
La Salle vs. Adamson202
UE vs. UST202

Seeds

In the 23 tournaments the Final Four format has been applied, the higher seed has beaten the lower seeds in the semifinals due to their twice to beat advantage, for the most part:

  1. The #1 seed has beaten the #4 seed in 21 out of the 23 times (91%).
    • The #1 seed has beaten the #4 seed 16 times on the first game (76%).
    • The #1 seed has beaten the #4 seed 5 times on the second game (24%).
    • The only times the #1 seed was beaten by the #4 seed were during the NU-UST matchup in Season 76 (UST won), and the ADMU-NU matchup in Season 77 (NU won).
  2. The #2 seed has beaten the #3 seed 17 out of 24 times (71%).
    • The #2 seed has beaten the #3 seed 13 times on the first game (76%).
    • The #2 seed has beaten the #3 seed 4 times on the second game (24%).
      • Out of the 7 times the #2 seed was beaten, the #2 seed was UE thrice (43%).
  3. The #3 seed has beaten the #4 seed once (100%)
    • With UE sweeping the elimination round, there were two semifinal rounds for 2007.
  4. The #1 seed skipped the semifinals once (6%; in 2007, when UE swept the elimination round)

A victory of the #3 seed in a series is considered a big upset considering that the #3 seed has to win twice, not to mention the perceived superiority of the #2 seed when compared to the #3 seed.

In the finals, the advantage of the #1 seed isn't as pronounced since the competing teams have to win the same number of games:

  1. The #1 seed has beaten the #2 seed 9 of 15 times (60%)
  2. The #1 seed has beaten the #3 seed 4 of 7 times (57%)
  3. The #2 seed has beaten the #1 seed 6 of 15 times (40%)
  4. The #2 seed has beaten the #4 seed 1 of 2 times (50%)
  5. The #3 seed has beaten the #1 seed 3 of 7 times (43%)
  6. The #4 seed has beaten the #2 seed 1 of 2 times (50%)
  7. The #1 seed has won the championship 13 of 24 times (54%)

Individual single-game records

Stats since the 2001 season.

StatisticNameTotalSchoolOpponentStage
Most pointsKen Bono33 Adamson Ateneo2006 Semifinals
Most reboundsRaymar Jose
23 FEU Ateneo2016 Semifinals
Most assistsMacky Escalona
Mike Cortez
Mike Cortez
9 Ateneo
 La Salle
 La Salle
 Adamson
 Ateneo
 NU
2006 Semifinals
2002 Finals
2001 Semifinals
Most stealsElmer Espiritu
Pocholo Villanueva
5 UE
 La Salle
 Ateneo
 UE
2008 Semifinals
2007 Finals
Most blocksNonoy Baclao7 Ateneo La Salle2008 Finals

*game went into overtime.

See also

References

  1. UE completes 14-0, but barely Archived 2007-09-15 at the Wayback Machine. by Jasmine Payo, Philippine Daily Inquirer. Published 09/14/2007, accessed 1/1/2007.
  2. Additional incentive for UAAP sweep Archived 2008-10-06 at the Wayback Machine. by Jasmine Payo, Philippine Daily Inquirer. Published 6/28/2008, accessed 6/28/2008.
  3. Villar, Joey (13 June 2009). "UAAP okays rules on tiebreak, instant replay". The Philippine Star. Archived from the original on 9 September 2012. Retrieved 20 June 2009.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.