Stevens v. Gladding

Stevens v. Gladding
Full case name Stevens v. Gladding
Citations 58 U.S. 447 (more)
Holding
The copyright of a work is not attached to the physical copperplate used to print the work, so purchasing the copperplate does not purchase the copyright.
Laws applied
Supplemental Copyright Act of 1819,
Copyright Act of 1831

Stevens v. Gladding, 58 U.S. 447 (1854), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held the copyright of a work is not attached to the physical copperplate used to print the work, so purchasing the copperplate does not purchase the copyright.[1]

It also applied a principle from English law that courts of equity could not award penalties and concluded that copyright infringement damages categorically could not be awarded by equity, as distinguished from legal actions under common law. This meant that copyright holders would be required to file separate lawsuits for injunctions against the continued printing of works created by them (equity) and for requesting retroactive payment from infringers (law). That procedural requirement remained in place until the federal courts merged the law and equity dockets in 1938.[2]

This case is closely related to Stephens v. Cady.

References

  1. ↑ Stevens v. Gladding, 58 U.S. 447 (1854)
  2. ↑ Gómez-Arostegui, H. Tomás (2013). "What History Teaches Us About US Copyright Law and Statutory Damages". The WIPO Journal. 5: 76–86. SSRN 2380396.

Works related to Stevens v. Gladding at Wikisource

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.