Soke (legal)

The term soke (/ˈsoʊk/; in Old English: soc, connected ultimately with secan, "to seek"), at the time of the Norman conquest of England generally denoted "jurisdiction", but its vague usage makes it probably lack a single, precise definition.[1]

Anglo-Saxon origins

The phrase 'Sac and soc' was used in early English for the right to hold a court:[2] (The primary meaning of 'soc' seems to have involved seeking; thus soka faldae was the duty of seeking the lord's court, just as secta ad molendinum was the duty of seeking the lord's mill.)[1] Royal grants of sac and soc were once seen by historians like Vinogradoff as opening the way for the replacement of national by local justice, through the creation of immunities or franchises:[3] as G. M. Trevelyan put it, “by grants of sac and soc private justice was encroaching on public justice”.[4] More recent thinking has by contrast emphasised the very limited judicial powers represented by the Anglo-Saxon Soke.[5] The standard grant of sac et soc, toll et team et infangthief merely represented the equivalent of the authority of the reeve at the hundred court,[6] only impinging on royal justice, if at all, in the right to slay a thief caught red-handed (infangentheof).[7]

Sokemen

A sokeman belonged to a class of tenants, found chiefly in the eastern counties, especially the Danelaw, occupying an intermediate position between the free tenants and the bond tenants, in that they owned and paid taxes on their land themselves.[8] Forming between 30% and 50% of the countryside, they could buy and sell their land, but owed service to their lord's soke, court, or jurisdiction, [9] (though Adolphus Ballard argued that a sokeman was merely a man who rendered service from a sokeland, and was not necessarily under jurisdiction.).[1]

Sokemen remained an important rural element after the Conquest, buying and selling property, and providing their overlords with money rents and court attendance, rather than manorial labour.[10] According to the Ely Inquiry, the terms of remit for the Domesday Book specified determining for each manor “how many freemen; how many sokemen...and how much each freeman and sokeman had and has”.[11]

Later developments

After the Norman Conquest, doubt developed over the precise meaning of the word soke. In some versions of the much-used tract Interpretationes vocabulorum soke is defined: aver fraunc court, and in others as interpellacio maioris audientiae, which glosses somewhat ambiguously as claim ajustis et requeste:[1] thus sometimes soke denoted the right to hold a court, especially when associated with sak or sake in the alliterative jingle sake and soke; sometimes only the right to receive the fines and forfeitures of the men over whom it was granted when they had been condemned in a court of competent jurisdiction. The Leges also speaks of pleas in socna, id est, in quaestione sua (pleas which are in his investigation).

Ballard in the early twentieth century argued that the interpretation of the word "soke" as jurisdiction should be accepted only where it stands for the fuller phrase, "sake and soke", and that "soke" standing by itself denoted services. Certainly, many passages in the Domesday Book support this contention, but in other passages "soke" seems to serve merely as a short expression for "sake and soke". The difficulties about the correct interpretation of these words will probably not unravel until historians elucidate more fully the normal functions and jurisdiction of the various local courts.[1][12]

Territorial

The term soke, unlike sake, sometimes applied to the district over which the right of jurisdiction extended (compare Soke of Peterborough).[1] By the same usage, it could designate the ward of a town, as with Aldgate in the charters of Henry I.[13]

The law term, socage, used of this tenure, arose by adding the French suffix -age to soc.[1]

See also

References

Notes

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Soke". Encyclopedia Britanica. 25 (11 ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 353.
  2. ↑ G. M. Trevelyan, History of England (London 1926) p. 92
  3. ↑ J. B. Bury, The Cambridge Medieval History Vol III (Cambridge 1922)p. 466
  4. ↑ G. M. Trevelyan, History of England (London 1926) p. 92
  5. ↑ S. Baxter ed., Early Medieval Studies in Memory of Patrick Wormald (2017)
  6. ↑ A. G. Little ed, Essays in Medieval History Presented to Thomas Frederick Tout (Manchester 1925) p. 48
  7. ↑ J. Hudson, The Oxford History of the Laws of England II (Oxford 2012) p. 291
  8. ↑ G. O. Sayles, The Medieval Foundations of England (London 1966) p. 136
  9. ↑ G. O. Sayles, The Medieval Foundations of England (London 1966) p. 136
  10. ↑ G. O. Sayles, The Medieval Foundations of England (London 1966) p. 243
  11. ↑ Quoted in D. Douglas, William the Conqueror (London 1966) p. 349
  12. ↑ Ballard. The Domesday Inquest. p. 84
  13. ↑ A. G. Little ed, Essays in Medieval History Presented to Thomas Frederick Tout (Manchester 1925) p. 48

Sources

  • Public Domain This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Soke". Encyclopædia Britannica (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press.

  • Ballard, Adolphus (1906). The Domesday Inquest. London: Methuen & Co.
   • The Story of Our Law for Little Children (A simple history of the word Socage)
   • *Wikisource Vinogradoff, Paul (1911). "Socage". Encyclopædia Britannica (11th ed.).
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.