Sébastien Nadot

Statement by Sébastien Nadot in the Foreign Affairs Committee

Sébastien Nadot is a French politician representing La République En Marche! He was elected to the French National Assembly on 18 June 2017, representing the department of Haute-Garonne.[1] Sébastien Nadot , born July 8, 1972 in Fleurance ( Gers ), is a French historian , writer and politician , associate professor of physical education and sports, also a doctor of history. He was an associate member of the EESC (Economic, Social and Environmental Council), employment and labor section, from December 2015 to June 18, 2017, when he was elected MP for the tenth district of Haute-Garonne . He is a member of the Parliamentary Assembly of La Francophonie .

Sitting on the Foreign Affairs Committee, after officially calling on the government in a written question, he is against the sale of French weapons used by Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates to bomb the civilian population of Yemen on a daily basis. In an interview given on the program "Quotidien" of February 23, 2018 presented by Yann Barthès, as already claimed by a resolution of the European Parliament, he clearly asks to suspend arms sales to the Gulf countries that use it on civilian populations. On April 6, 2018, he filed a request for the opening of a commission of inquiry to the National Assembly on the respect of France's international commitments with regard to arms export licenses in Yemen.

Biography

Sebastien Nadot has taught at various secondary and university educational institutions and Apprenticeship Training Center (Mantes-la-Jolie, Orleans, Bourges, Nice, Toulouse, several institutions of Haute-Garonne).

Holder of a phD in history and civilizations from EHESS Paris (2009), he also taught history at the University of Orleans (1998-2003) and the University of Nice (2005-2008) . In 2015/2016, he follows a preparation at ENA in continuing education at the Institute of Political Studies of Toulouse.

Citizen candidate for the 2017 presidential election supported by the Progressists Movement, it promotes a new democratic dynamic around three pillars: social progress that benefits all, the environmental filter posed prior to any public decision and the participation of citizens decision-making phases of political action. He says he wants to erase the line between the political elite and the citizens. His candidacy was initially to be inserted in the primary citizen of 2017 but the first secretary of the PS Jean-Christophe Cambadélis the recale. To block the road to François Fillon and Marine Le Pen, he made a call to the gathering of "progressive forces" for the presidential election addressed to Emmanuel Macron, Jean-Luc Melenchon, Charlotte Marchandise and Yannick Jadot.

He is the first French politician to have used an augmented reality campaign poster.

In January 2017, he published a political tale titled Reinette 2.0. In this novel, he discusses the relationship between democracy, the Internet and social networks.

In February 2017, faced with the difficulty of collecting the 500 sponsorships needed to run for the presidential election, he announced his withdrawal, to support Emmanuel Macron personally and joined the political council of En marche!

He is invested by En marche! to be a candidate in the legislative elections on the 10th district of Haute-Garonne. He is elected with 60.48% of the votes. He is a member of the Foreign Affairs Committee in the National Assembly. He is chair of the France - Québec Parliamentary Friendship Group.

University Work

His academic work focuses on the history of the body, physical practices and education. His thesis and his recent work make it possible to approach sport in its anthropological continuum, from ancient Greece and its Olympic Games, to the present day. The contours of the current sport and their complexity would be largely related to the strong relationship of corporal practices with the media. In contrast to the work of Norbert Elias, who links the birth of sport to a lowering of the degree of violence in practice and to the advent of a specific ethic, his theory is not contrary to certain ideas of Pierre de Coubertin who wrote about the medieval knight that "The sporting passion takes hold of him, lifts him up and, through him and through him, will spread throughout all of Western Europe from Germany, Spain, from Italy to England, France serving as a central hub for movement "

Inspired by the ideas of Georges Duby and Eric Hobsbawm, his work also focuses on the relationship between men and their territories and on the notion of human networks through the example of the orders of chivalry or the heralds of arms: the construction of a sporting code of conduct predates the eighteenth century.

In his thesis titled Jousts, Roots and No Weapons in Castile, Burgundy and France (1428-1470), Sébastien Nadot shows that sport already existed in the fifteenth century and that, therefore, sport was not born in France. 19th century in England within the bourgeoisie.

This historical vision opens a breach in a building built on the basis of the work of Norbert Elias. In addition to this contribution in break with the widespread doxa (see on this subject the works of synthesis of Georges Vigarello), it also showed that the organization of the chivalry around European contests works like a system in elaborate network. Sébastien Nadot evokes an "International chivalrous", sharing the same codes, especially at the approach of tournaments and games. These sporting events go beyond the borders and are accompanied by a common cultural base, in which are courtesy, fair play, honor and loyalty. Part of the thesis attempts to demonstrate that medieval sports events are first-class communication media, prefiguration of the modern Olympic Games. Political, diplomatic and financial issues are emerging behind the greatest medieval spectacle. Specialist games, Sébastien Nadot is more interested in the sporting phenomenon, the notion of conflict (physical or verbal) and also the "revival" of the Middle Ages in the twenty-first century. His work on chivalric orders, knightly journeys and heralds of arms also led to a reflection on medieval social networks.

On the other hand, if sport was not born with the British industrial revolution within the bourgeoisie, it calls into question its "capitalist" essence and questions its nature as a terrain of ideological struggles.

Starting from the results of his investigation of medieval chivalric combats, Sébastien Nadot proposes a new theory of the evolution of sport. In each era, the ruling class would try through sport to impose on others its values and beyond, its superiority. Sport is therefore today the expression of neo-conservative liberalism. The idea of its birth in the early nineteenth century would be the expression of the new domination of the bourgeoisie. The belief in the birth of sport ex-nihilo in England at this time would be a confusion with a process of increased democratization, especially in its gradual opening to women.

These works are to be placed in a wider debate: the dedicated authors of the history of sport (Norbert Elias, Allen Guttmann) consider that modern sport emerges only at the turn of the eighteenth century and nineteenth century, the specialists of medieval and modern periods claiming the right to use this concept, even though many of the criteria of modern sport do not end up before the nineteenth century.

See also

References

  1. ↑ "Elections législatives 2017". Ministry of the Interior (in French). Retrieved 19 June 2017.


This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.