Ross v. Blake
Ross v. Blake | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Argued March 29, 2016 Decided June 6, 2016 | |
Full case name | Michael Ross, Petitioner v. Shaidon Blake |
Docket nos. | 15–339 |
Citations |
578 U.S. ___ (more) 136 S. Ct. 1850; 195 L. Ed. 2d 117 |
Opinion announcement | Opinion announcement |
Holding | |
The Prison Litigation Reform Act’s requirement to exhaust administrative remedies does not have a “special circumstances” exception. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Kagan, joined by Roberts, Kennedy, Ginsburg, Alito, Sotomayor |
Concurrence | Thomas |
Concurrence | Breyer |
Laws applied | |
Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 |
Ross v. Blake, 578 U.S. ___ (2016), was a United States Supreme Court case regarding the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995.[1][2]
Opinion of the Court
Associate Justice Elena Kagan authored the majority opinion.[2]
References
External links
- Text of Ross v. Blake, 578 U.S. ___ (2016) is available from: CourtListener Justia Oyez (oral argument audio) Supreme Court (slip opinion)
- SCOTUSblog coverage
This article is issued from
Wikipedia.
The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike.
Additional terms may apply for the media files.