Manuel v. Joliet

Manuel v. Joliet
Argued October 5, 2016
Decided March 21, 2017
Full case name Manuel v. City of Joliet, Illinois, et al.
Docket nos. 14–9496
Citations 580 U.S. ___ (more)
Prior history Manuel v. Joliet, 590 Fed. Appx. 641 (7th Cir. 2015)
Procedural history On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Holding
A criminal defendant may challenge his pretrial detention on the ground that it violated the Fourth Amendment (all other issues, including the claim’s timeliness, was left to the court below).
Court membership
Chief Justice
John Roberts
Associate Justices
Anthony Kennedy · Clarence Thomas
Ruth Bader Ginsburg · Stephen Breyer
Samuel Alito · Sonia Sotomayor
Elena Kagan
Case opinions
Majority Kagan, joined by Roberts, Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor
Dissent Thomas
Dissent Alito, joined by Thomas
Laws applied
U.S. Const. amend. IV

Manuel v. Joliet, 580 U.S. ___ (2017), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that a criminal defendant may bring a claim under the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution to challenge pretrial confinement.[1] In a 6-2 majority opinion written by Justice Elena Kagan, the Court stated that "the Fourth Amendment governs a claim for unlawful pretrial detention even beyond the start of legal process".[2] This decision reversed and remanded the judgment of the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals.[3] Justice Clarence Thomas wrote a dissenting opinion.[4] Justice Thomas also joined a dissenting opinion by Justice Samuel Alito.[5]

See also

References

  1. ↑ Manuel v. Joliet, No. 14–9496, 580 U.S. ___ (2017), slip. op. at 1.
  2. ↑ Manuel v. Joliet, slip op. at 11.
  3. ↑ Manuel v. Joliet, slip op. at 15.
  4. ↑ Manuel v. Joliet, slip op. at 1 (Thomas, J., dissenting).
  5. ↑ Manuel v. Joliet, slip op. at 1 (Alito, J., dissenting).
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.