List of Conference USA football standings

Conference USA first sponsored football in 1996. This is a list of its annual standings since establishment.[1]

Standings

1996 Conference USA football standings
Conf  Overall
Team W L    W L 
Southern Miss +  4 –1     8 –3  
Houston +  4 –1     7 –5  
Cincinnati  2 –3     6 –5  
Louisville  2 –3     5 –6  
Memphis  2 –3     4 –7  
Tulane  1 –4     2 –9  
  • + – Conference co-champions
Rankings from AP Poll
1997 Conference USA football standings
Conf  Overall
Team W L    W L 
No. 19 Southern Miss $  6 –0     9 –3  
Tulane  5 –1     7 –4  
East Carolina  4 –2     5 –6  
Cincinnati  2 –4     8 –4  
Memphis  2 –4     4 –7  
Houston  2 –4     3 –8  
Louisville  0 –6     1 –10  
  • $ – Conference champion
Rankings from AP Poll
1998 Conference USA football standings
Conf  Overall
Team W L    W L 
No. 7 Tulane $  6 –0     12 –0  
Southern Miss  5 –1     7 –5  
Louisville  4 –2     7 –5  
East Carolina  3 –3     6 –5  
Army  2 –4     3 –8  
Houston  2 –4     3 –8  
Cincinnati  1 –5     2 –9  
Memphis  1 –5     2 –9  
  • $ – Conference champion
Rankings from AP Poll
1999 Conference USA football standings
Conf  Overall
Team W L    W L 
No. 14 Southern Miss $  6 –0     9 –3  
East Carolina  4 –2     9 –3  
Louisville  4 –2     7 –5  
UAB  4 –2     5 –6  
Memphis  4 –2     5 –6  
Houston  3 –3     7 –4  
Army  1 –5     3 –8  
Tulane  1 –5     3 –8  
Cincinnati  0 –6     3 –8  
  • $ – Conference champion
Rankings from AP Poll
2000 Conference USA football standings
Conf  Overall
Team W L    W L 
Louisville $  6 –1     9 –3  
East Carolina  5 –2     8 –4  
Cincinnati  5 –2     7 –5  
Southern Miss  4 –3     8 –4  
UAB  3 –3     7 –4  
Tulane  3 –4     6 –5  
Memphis  2 –5     4 –7  
Houston  2 –5     3 –8  
Army  1 –6     1 –10  
  • $ – Conference champion
Rankings from AP Poll
2001 Conference USA football standings
Conf  Overall
Team W L    W L 
No. 17 Louisville $  6 –1     11 –2  
Cincinnati  5 –2     7 –5  
UAB  5 –2     6 –5  
East Carolina  5 –2     6 –6  
Southern Miss  4 –3     6 –5  
TCU  4 –3     6 –6  
Memphis  3 –4     5 –6  
Army  2 –5     3 –8  
Tulane  1 –6     3 –9  
Houston  0 –7     0 –11  
  • $ – Conference champion
Rankings from AP Poll
2002 Conference USA football standings
Conf  Overall
Team W L    W L 
No. 23 TCU +  6 –2     10 –2  
Cincinnati +  6 –2     7 –7  
Louisville  5 –3     7 –6  
Southern Miss  5 –3     7 –6  
Tulane  4 –4     8 –5  
UAB  4 –4     5 –7  
East Carolina  4 –4     4 –8  
Houston  3 –5     5 –7  
Memphis  2 –6     3 –9  
Army  1 –7     1 –11  
  • + – Conference co-champions
Rankings from AP Poll
2003 Conference USA football standings
Conf  Overall
Team W L    W L 
Southern Miss $  8 –0     9 –4  
No. 24 TCU  7 –1     11 –2  
Louisville  5 –3     9 –4  
Memphis  5 –3     9 –4  
South Florida  5 –3     7 –4  
Houston  4 –4     7 –6  
UAB  4 –4     5 –7  
Tulane  3 –5     5 –7  
Cincinnati  2 –6     5 –7  
East Carolina  1 –7     1 –11  
Army  0 –8     0 –13  
  • $ – Conference champion
Rankings from AP Poll
2004 Conference USA football standings
Conf  Overall
Team W L    W L 
No. 6 Louisville $  8 –0     11 –1  
Memphis  5 –3     8 –4  
Southern Miss  5 –3     7 –5  
Cincinnati  5 –3     7 –5  
UAB  5 –3     7 –5  
TCU  3 –5     5 –6  
Tulane  3 –5     5 –6  
South Florida  3 –5     4 –7  
Houston  3 –5     3 –8  
East Carolina  2 –6     2 –9  
Army  2 –6     2 –9  
  • $ – Conference champion
Rankings from AP Poll
2005 Conference USA football standings
Conf  Overall
Team W L    W L 
East Division
UCF x  7 –1     8 –5  
Southern Miss  5 –3     7 –5  
Memphis  5 –3     7 –5  
East Carolina  4 –4     5 –6  
Marshall  3 –5     4 –7  
UAB  3 –5     5 –6  
West Division
Tulsa x$  6 –2     9 –4  
UTEP  5 –3     8 –4  
Houston  4 –4     6 –6  
SMU  4 –4     5 –6  
Tulane  1 –7     2 –9  
Rice  1 –7     1 –10  
Championship: Tulsa 44, Central Florida 27
  • $ – Conference champion
  • x – Division champion/co-champions
Rankings from AP Poll
2006 Conference USA football standings
Conf  Overall
Team W L    W L 
East Division
Southern Miss x  6 –2     9 –5  
East Carolina  5 –3     7 –6  
Marshall  4 –4     5 –7  
UCF  3 –5     4 –8  
UAB  2 –6     3 –9  
Memphis  1 –7     2 –10  
West Division
Houston x$  7 –1     10 –4  
Rice  6 –2     7 –6  
Tulsa  5 –3     8 –5  
SMU  4 –4     6 –6  
UTEP  3 –5     5 –7  
Tulane  2 –6     4 –8  
Championship: Houston 34, Southern Miss 20
  • $ – Conference champion
  • x – Division champion/co-champions
Rankings from AP Poll
2007 Conference USA football standings
Conf  Overall
Team W L    W L 
East Division
UCF x$  7 –1     10 –4  
East Carolina  6 –2     8 –5  
Memphis  6 –2     7 –6  
Southern Miss  5 –3     7 –6  
Marshall  3 –5     3 –9  
UAB  1 –7     2 –10  
West Division
Tulsa xy  6 –2     10 –4  
Houston x  6 –2     8 –5  
Tulane  3 –5     4 –8  
Rice  3 –5     3 –9  
UTEP  2 –6     4 –8  
SMU  0 –8     1 –11  
Championship: UCF 44, Tulsa 25
  • $ – Conference champion
  • x – Division champion/co-champions
  • y – Championship game participant
Rankings from AP Poll
2008 Conference USA football standings
Conf  Overall
Team W L    W L 
East Division
East Carolina x$  6 –2     9 –5  
Memphis  4 –4     6 –7  
Southern Miss  4 –4     7 –6  
UAB  3 –5     4 –8  
UCF  3 –5     4 –8  
Marshall  3 –5     4 –8  
West Division
Tulsa xy  7 –1     11 –3  
Rice x  7 –1     10 –3  
Houston  6 –2     8 –5  
UTEP  4 –4     5 –7  
Tulane  1 –7     2 –10  
SMU  0 –8     1 –11  
Championship: East Carolina 27, Tulsa 24
  • $ – Conference champion
  • x – Division champion/co-champions
  • y – Championship game participant
Rankings from AP Poll
2009 Conference USA football standings
Conf  Overall
Team W L    W L 
East Division
East Carolina x$  7 –1     9 –5  
UCF  6 –2     8 –5  
Southern Miss  5 –3     7 –6  
Marshall  4 –4     7 –6  
UAB  4 –4     5 –7  
Memphis  1 –7     2 –10  
West Division
Houston xy  6 –2     10 –4  
SMU x  6 –2     8 –5  
Tulsa  3 –5     5 –7  
UTEP  3 –5     4 –8  
Rice  2 –6     2 –10  
Tulane  1 –7     3 –9  
Championship: East Carolina 38, #18 Houston 32
  • $ – Conference champion
  • x – Division champion/co-champions
  • y – Championship game participant
Rankings from AP Poll
2010 Conference USA football standings
Conf  Overall
Team W L    W L 
East Division
No. 21 UCF x$  7 –1     11 –3  
East Carolina  5 –3     6 –7  
Southern Miss  5 –3     8 –5  
Marshall  4 –4     5 –7  
UAB  3 –5     4 –8  
Memphis  0 –8     1 –11  
West Division
SMU xy  6 –2     7 –7  
No. 24 Tulsa x  6 –2     10 –3  
Houston  4 –4     5 –7  
UTEP  3 –5     6 –7  
Rice  3 –5     4 –8  
Tulane  2 –6     4 –8  
Championship: UCF 17, SMU 7
  • $ – Conference champion
  • x – Division champion/co-champions
  • y – Championship game participant
As of January 11, 2011; Rankings from AP Poll
2011 Conference USA football standings
Conf  Overall
Team W L    W L 
East Division
No. 20 Southern Miss x$  6 –2     12 –2  
Marshall  5 –3     7 –6  
East Carolina  4 –4     5 –7  
UAB  3 –5     3 –9  
UCF  3 –5     5 –7  
Memphis  1 –7     2 –10  
West Division
No. 18 Houston x  8 –0     13 –1  
Tulsa  7 –1     8 –5  
SMU  5 –3     8 –5  
Rice  3 –5     4 –8  
UTEP  2 –6     5 –7  
Tulane  1 –7     2 –10  
Championship: Southern Miss 49, Houston 28
  • $ – Conference champion
  • x – Division champion/co-champions
As of January 10, 2012; Rankings from AP Poll
2012 Conference USA football standings
Conf  Overall
Team W L    W L 
East Division
UCF xy  7 –1     10 –4  
East Carolina x  7 –1     8 –5  
Marshall  4 –4     5 –7  
Memphis  4 –4     4 –8  
UAB  2 –6     3 –9  
Southern Miss  0 –8     0 –12  
West Division
Tulsa xy$  7 –1     10 –3  
SMU  5 –3     7 –6  
Rice  4 –4     7 –6  
Houston  4 –4     5 –7  
UTEP  2 –6     3 –9  
Tulane  2 –6     2 –10  
Championship: Tulsa 33, UCF 27
  • $ – Conference champion
  • x – Division champion/co-champions
  • y – Championship game participant
Rankings from AP Poll
2013 Conference USA football standings
Conf  Overall
Team W L    W L 
East Division
Marshall x  7 –1     10 –4  
East Carolina  6 –2     10 –3  
Middle Tennessee  6 –2     8 –5  
Florida Atlantic  4 –4     6 –6  
UAB  1 –7     2 –10  
Southern Miss  1 –7     1 –11  
FIU  1 –7     1 –11  
West Division
Rice x$  7 –1     10 –4  
UTSA  6 –2     7 –5  
North Texas  6 –2     9 –4  
Tulane  5 –3     7 –6  
Louisiana Tech  3 –5     4 –8  
Tulsa  2 –6     3 –9  
UTEP  1 –7     2 –10  
Championship: Rice 41, Marshall 24
  • $ – Conference champion
  • x – Division champion/co-champions
Rankings from AP Poll
2014 Conference USA football standings
Conf  Overall
Team W L    W L 
East Division
No. 23 Marshall x$  7 –1     13 –1  
Middle Tennessee  5 –3     6 –6  
WKU  4 –4     8 –5  
UAB  4 –4     6 –6  
Old Dominion*  4 –4     6 –6  
FIU  3 –5     4 –8  
Florida Atlantic  2 –6     3 –9  
West Division
Louisiana Tech x  7 –1     9 –5  
Rice  5 –3     8 –5  
UTEP  5 –3     7 –6  
UTSA  3 –5     4 –8  
North Texas  2 –6     4 –8  
Southern Miss  1 –7     3 –9  
Championship: Marshall 26, Louisiana Tech 23
  • $ – Conference champion
  • x – Division champion/co-champions
  • Ineligible for post season bowl due to transition from FCS.
As of 22:24, 20 December 2014 (UTC); Rankings from AP Poll
2015 Conference USA football standings
Conf  Overall
Team W L    W L 
East Division
No. 24 WKU x$  8 –0     12 –2  
Middle Tennessee  6 –2     7 –6  
Marshall  6 –2     10 –3  
FIU  3 –5     5 –7  
Old Dominion  3 –5     5 –7  
Florida Atlantic  3 –5     3 –9  
Charlotte  0 –8     2 –10  
West Division
Southern Miss x  7 –1     9 –5  
Louisiana Tech  6 –2     9 –4  
UTSA  3 –5     3 –9  
UTEP  3 –5     5 –7  
Rice  3 –5     5 –7  
North Texas  1 –7     1 –11  
Championship: WKU 45, Southern Miss 28
  • $ – Conference champion
  • x – Division champion/co-champions
As of January 12, 2015; Rankings from AP Poll
2016 Conference USA football standings
Conf  Overall
Team W L    W L 
East Division
WKU xy$  7 –1     11 –3  
Old Dominion x  7 –1     10 –3  
Middle Tennessee  5 –3     8 –5  
FIU  4 –4     4 –8  
Charlotte  3 –5     4 –8  
Marshall  2 –6     3 –9  
Florida Atlantic  2 –6     3 –9  
West Division
Louisiana Tech xy  6 –2     9 –5  
UTSA  5 –3     6 –7  
Southern Miss  4 –4     7 –6  
North Texas  3 –5     5 –8  
Rice  2 –6     3 –9  
UTEP  2 –6     4 –8  
Championship: Western Kentucky 58, Louisiana Tech 44
  • $ – Conference champion
  • x – Division champion/co-champions
Rankings from AP Poll
2017 Conference USA football standings
Conf  Overall
Team W L    W L 
East Division
Florida Atlantic xy$  8 –0     11 –3  
FIU  5 –3     8 –5  
Marshall  4 –4     8 –5  
Western Kentucky  4 –4     6 –7  
Middle Tennessee  4 –4     7 –6  
Old Dominion  3 –5     5 –7  
Charlotte  1 –7     1 –11  
West Division
North Texas xy  7 –1     9 –5  
UAB  6 –2     8 –5  
Southern Miss  6 –2     8 –5  
Louisiana Tech  4 –4     7 –6  
UTSA  3 –5     6 –5  
Rice  1 –7     1 –11  
UTEP  0 –8     0 –12  
Championship: Florida Atlantic 41, North Texas 17
  • $ – Conference champion
  • x – Division champion/co-champions
  • y – Championship game participant
As of October 18, 2018; Rankings from AP Poll
2018 Conference USA football standings
Conf  Overall
Team W L    W L 
East Division
FIU  2 –0     4 –2  
Middle Tennessee  2 –1     3 –3  
Marshall  2 –1     4 –2  
Charlotte  2 –1     3 –3  
Florida Atlantic  1 –1     3 –3  
Western Kentucky  0 –2     1 –5  
Old Dominion  0 –4     1 –6  
West Division
UAB  3 –0     5 –1  
Louisiana Tech  2 –1     4 –2  
North Texas  2 –1     6 –1  
UTSA  2 –1     3 –4  
Southern Miss  1 –1     2 –3  
UTEP  0 –2     0 –6  
Rice  0 –3     1 –6  
Championship: December 1, 2018
As of October 18, 2018; Rankings from AP Poll

References

  1. ↑ "FOOTBALL RECORD BOOK 2017" (PDF). conferenceusa.com. Conference USA. pp. 1–7. Retrieved April 29, 2018.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.