Kansas v. Marsh
Kansas v. Marsh | |
---|---|
| |
Argued December 7, 2005 Reargued April 25, 2006 Decided June 26, 2006 | |
Full case name | Kansas v. Michael Lee Marsh, II |
Docket nos. | 04-1170 |
Citations | 548 U.S. 163 (more) |
Holding | |
The Eighth Amendment did not prohibit states from imposing the death penalty when mitigating and aggravating sentencing factors were in equipoise. Kansas Supreme Court reversed and remanded. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Thomas, joined by Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Alito |
Concurrence | Scalia |
Dissent | Stevens |
Dissent | Souter, joined by Stevens, Ginsburg, Breyer |
Laws applied | |
U.S. Const. amend. VIII |
Kansas v. Marsh, 548 U.S. 163 (2006), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a Kansas death penalty statute was consistent with the United States Constitution. The statute in question provided for a death sentence when the aggravating factors and mitigating factors were of equal weight.[1]
See also
References
- ↑ The Supreme Court, 2005 Term — Leading Cases, 120 Harv. L. Rev. 144 (2006).
External links
This article is issued from
Wikipedia.
The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike.
Additional terms may apply for the media files.