Joseph Uscinski

Joseph Uscinski (born 1975) is an American political scientist specializing in the study of conspiracy theories.^[1] His most notable work is American Conspiracy Theories (Oxford, 2014) co-authored with Joseph M. Parent.^[2]

Biography

Uscinski is originally from New England. He received his BA in political science from Plymouth State University, his MA from University of New Hampshire, and his Ph.D. from University of Arizona. He has been a member of the University of Miami political science department since 2007.^[3]

In 2015, Uscinski organized and convened the first international conference on conspiracy theory research in Miami.^[4][5][6] The conference featured more than fifty scholars from ten countries.^[7]

Uscinski was frequently consulted by journalists during the 2016 U.S. election for his commentary on the rise of campaign-fueled conspiracy theories.^[8][9] and for his criticism of their use by politicians.^[10]

Publications

Uscinski's first book, The People's News: Media, Politics, and the Demands of Capitalism,^[11][12] was published by New York University Press in 2014. In it, he argued that profit motives were the largest factor driving American journalism, and he supported this argument with a study focusing on the likelihood that regional newspapers would reprint a story from the back of the national section of the New York Times as a function of whether or not the story focused on dogs. The study found that dog stories were 2.6 times more likely to be reprinted elsewhere than was the case for equivalent dog-free news.^{[13][14][15][16]}

His second book, co-authored with Joseph M. Parent, American Conspiracy Theories, was published by Oxford University Press in 2014. In this book, Uscinski and Parent study the waxing and waning of conspiracy theorizing over time in the United States. The main hypothesis of the book was that conspiracy theories are for losers. By that, they argue that those who are out of power tend to use conspiracy theories to consolidate resources, focus attention on an enemy, and aim at redemption. This manifests itself particularly after elections. According to Uscinski “in the U.S., conspiracy theories tend to swing back and forth. When a Democrat is in the White House, the most resonant conspiracy theories accuse Democrats and their allies of conspiring. When a Republican is in the White House, the accusations focus on Republicans and their allies.”^[17]The book has been widely reviewed ^{[18][19][20][21]} and discussed.^[22] Recent survey evidence taken before and after the 2016 election provides positive evidence for the "conspiracy theories are for losers" theory.^[23] More controversially, Uscinski argues that Republicans and Democrats are equally taken to conspiracy theorizing,^[24][25][26] and that Americans may not be engaging in conspiracy theorizing more than in previous decades.

Uscinski has also found that there are individual differences in our more general proneness toward conspiracy theory thinking. "Some people see events and circumstances and immediately think that a conspiracy is behind them. Other people don’t. Our propensity to see conspiracies lurking behind every corner is largely determined by processes that occurred during our formative years. People’s worldviews are solidified as they move into adulthood." ^[17]

Uscinski prominently discussed the use of conspiracy theories in the 2016 election.^{[27][28][29][30]} He argued that Trump was using conspiracy theories to mobilize sectors of the electorate that did not trust mainstream candidates.^[31][32] Since the election, Uscinski has spoken against fake news,^[33][34] but has suggested that fake news may not be a new problem.^[35]

References