Hector's dolphin

Hector's dolphin
Size compared to an average human
Scientific classification
Kingdom:Animalia
Phylum:Chordata
Class:Mammalia
Order:Artiodactyla
Infraorder:Cetacea
Family:Delphinidae
Genus:Cephalorhynchus
Species: C. hectori
Binomial name
Cephalorhynchus hectori
Subspecies
  • C. h. hectori
  • C. h. maui

Hector's dolphin (Cephalorhynchus hectori) is the best-known of the four dolphins in the genus Cephalorhynchus and, along with its subspecies Maui's dolphin, is the only cetacean endemic to New Zealand. At approximately 1.4 m (4.6 ft) in length, it is one of the smallest cetaceans.

Two subspecies occur: C. h. hectori, the more numerous subspecies, is found around the South Island, and the critically endangered Maui's dolphin (C. h. maui) is found off the northwest coast of the North Island.[2] Hector's dolphin is the world's smallest and rarest dolphin.[3] Maui's dolphin is one of the eight most endangered groups of cetaceans. A 2010/2011 survey of Maui's dolphin by the New Zealand Department of Conservation estimated only 55 adults remain.[4]

Hector's dolphin was named after Sir James Hector (1834–1907), who was the curator of the Colonial Museum in Wellington (now the Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa). He examined the first specimen found of the dolphin. The species was scientifically described by Belgian zoologist Pierre-Joseph van Beneden in 1881.

Māori names for Hector's and Maui's dolphin include tutumairekurai, tupoupou and popoto.

Description

Hector's dolphin has a unique rounded dorsal fin.

Hector's dolphin is the smallest of the dolphins. Mature adults have a total length of 1.2–1.6 m (3 ft 11 in–5 ft 3 in) and weigh 40–60 kg (88–132 lb).[5] The species is sexually dimorphic, with females being about 5-7% longer than males.[6] The body shape is stocky, with no discernible beak. The most distinctive feature is the rounded dorsal fin, with a convex trailing edge and undercut rear margin.

The overall coloration appearance is pale grey, but closer inspection reveals a complex and elegant combination of colours. The back and sides are predominantly light grey, while the dorsal fin, flippers, and flukes are black. The eyes are surrounded by a black mask, which extends forward to the tip of the rostrum and back to the base of the flipper. A subtly shaded, crescent-shaped black band crosses the head just behind the blowhole. The throat and belly are creamy white, separated by dark-grey bands meeting between the flippers. A white stripe extends from the belly onto each flank below the dorsal fin.

At birth, Hector’s dolphin calves have a total length of 60–80 cm (24–31 in) and weigh 8–10 kg (18–22 lb).[7] Their coloration is the almost same as adults, although the grey has a darker hue. Newborn Hector’s dolphins have distinct fetal fold marks on their flanks that cause a change in coloration pattern of the skin. These changes are visible for approximately 6 months and consist of four to six vertical light grey stripes against darker grey skin.[7]

Population and distribution

Hector's dolphins are endemic to the coastal regions of New Zealand. The species has a fragmented distribution around the entire South Island. Very occasional sightings of these individuals occur in the deep waters of Fiordland. The members of the species that inhabit the North Island (C. hectori maui) make up a genetically distinct allopatric population from Hector's dolphins.[2] , As of 2011, five areas are designed as marine mammal sanctuaries focusing on Hector's and Maui's dolphins around the nation.[8]

The largest populations live on the east and west coasts of the South Island, most notably on Banks Peninsula and Te Waewae Bay[9][10] while smaller local groups are scattered along entire South Island coasts such as at Cook Strait, Kaikoura, West Coast, Catlins (e.g. Porpoise Bay, Curio Bay), and Otago coasts (e.g.Karitane, Oamaru, Moeraki, Otago Harbour, Blueskin Bay).[11] Maui's dolphin lives on the west coast of the North Island between Maunganui Bluff and Whanganui.[12] Occasionally, Hector's dolphins can reach the North Island up to Bay of Plenty or Hawke's Bay.[13]

The latest estimate of South Island Hector's dolphins carried out by the Ministry for Primary Industries is around 15,000 individuals and almost twice the previous, published estimate.[14] Problems with the survey methods and data analysis, identified in peer review, are to be discussed when the Hector's dolphin Threat Management Plan is reviewed in 2018. Until that review, it is reasonable to conclude that the current population is on the order of 10,000 Hector's dolphins. The current population is below 30% of the population estimated in 1970 which was about 50,000.[15] The latest estimate of Maui's dolphin is 55 individuals (1 year and older). Additional population surveys have been carried out off the east coast in 2012 and 2013. The results of these surveys have not yet been published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal.

The species' range includes shallow waters down to 100 m (330 ft) deep, with very few sightings in deeper waters.[16][17] Hector’s dolphins showcase a seasonal inshore-offshore movement; they favor shallow and murky waters during the spring and summer months, but move offshore to deeper waters during autumn and winter. Despite this pattern, they are rarely seen farther than 8-10 km from shore. They have also been shown to return to the same location during consecutive summers, displaying high site fidelity, i.e. returning to the same location. This hinders gene flow between populations and ultimately leads to gene isolation. Hector’s dolphins have not been found to participate in alongshore migrations, which may also contribute to their lack of genetic diversity. The inshore-offshore movement of the species may be attributed to the patterns of fish and squid moving to spawning grounds or an increase in fish diversity close to the shore during the spring and summer months.[18]

Population Dynamics

Hector’s dolphins preferentially form groups of less than 5 individuals, with a mean of 3.8 individuals, that are highly segregated by sex. The majority of these small groups are single sex. Groups of greater than 5 individuals are formed much less frequently. These larger groups, >5, are usually mixed sex and have been shown to form only to forage or participate in sexual behavior. Nursery groups can also be observed and are usually all female groups of less than 7 mother and young.[6]

This species has been found to be show a high level of fluidity with weak inter-individual associations, meaning they do not form strong bonds with other individuals. Three types of small preferential groups have been found: nursery groups; immature and subadult groups; and adult male/female groups. All of these small groups show a high level of sex segregation. Hector’s dolphins display a sex-age population group composition, meaning they group by biological sex and age.[18]

Skeleton in the collection of the Pisa Charterhouse

Ecology and life history

Data from field studies, stranded individuals, and dolphins caught in fishing nets have provided information on their life history and reproductive parameters.[5] Photo-ID research at Banks Peninsula, and other locations around the South and North Island since 1984 has shown that individuals reach around 23 years of age.

Overall life-history characteristics mean that Hector's dolphins, like many other small cetaceans, have a low potential for population growth. Maximum population growth rate has been estimated to be 1.8-4.9% per year, although the lower end of this range is probably more realistic.[19]

Reproduction

Males attain sexual maturity between 6 and 9 years old and females begin birthing young between 7 to 9 years old. Females will continue to birth calves every 2-3 years, resulting in a maximum of 4-7 calves in one female’s lifetime. Calves are birthed during the spring and summer.[20] Calf mortality within the first 6 months of life has been found to be approximately 36%. Calves were found to breastfeed until close to a year old.[18]

Males of the species have extremely large testes in proportion to body size, with the highest relative weight in one study being 2.9% of body weight. Large testes in combination with males’ smaller overall body size suggests a promiscuous mating system. This type of reproductive system would involve a male attempting to fertilize as many females as possible and little male-male aggression. The amount of sexual behavior per individual in the species is observed most when small single sex groups form large mixed sex groups. Sexual behavior in the species is usually non aggressive.[20]

Foraging and predation

Hector's dolphins at Porpoise Bay, in the Catlins

Hector's dolphins live in groups of two to eight individuals. They feed at the ocean surface and sea floor, with their diets including ahuru, yellow-eyed mullet, kahawai, arrow squid, herring, and red cod.[21]

Hector's dolphins are generalist feeders, with prey selection based on size rather than species. Typically, they feed on smaller prey which tend to measure under 10 cm. in length.[22] Stomach contents of dissected dolphins have included surface-schooling fish, midwater fish, and squid, and a wide variety of benthic species.[23] The largest prey item recovered from a Hector's dolphin stomach was an undigested red cod weighing 500 g with a standard length of 35 cm. Many Hector's dolphins can be observed following fishing trawlers as a result of the amount of disturbed or escaped flatfish and red cod on which the species typically feed. However, this activity can result in the unwanted bycatching of the species.[24]

Similar to the Hourglass Dolphin, Hector's dolphins use high-frequency echolocation clicks. However, the Hector's Dolphin produces lower source-level clicks than Hourglass Dolphins due to their crowded environment. This means they can only spot prey at half the distance compared to an hourglass dolphin.[25] The species has a very simple repertoire with few types of clicks, as well as little audible signals in addition to these. More complex clicks could be observed in large groups.[26]

Natural predators of Hector’s dolphins include sharks and killer whales (orca). Remains of Hector's have been found in sevengill and blue shark stomachs.[27]

Although the biggest threat to this endangered species is inshore fishing, they also suffer from an infectious agent, Toxoplasma gondii. A study of 28 captured Hector's dolphins showed seven of them died due to toxoplasmosis. These dolphins were examined, and haemorrhagic lesions in the lungs, liver, lymph nodes, and adrenals were found.[28]

Loss of genetic diversity and population decline

The high levels of sex segregation and fragmentation of different populations in Hector’s dolphin have been discussed as contributing to the overall population decline, as it becomes more difficult for males to find a female and copulate. The Allee effect begins to occur when a low density population has low reproductive rates leading to increased population decline.[29]

Samples from 1870 to today have provided a historical timeline for the species' population decline. Lack of neighboring populations due to fishery related mortality has decreased gene flow and contributed to overall loss in mitochondrial DNA diversity. As a result, the populations have become fragmented and isolated, leading to inbreeding. Geographical range has been lessened to the point where gene flow and immigration may no longer be possible between Maui's dolphin and Hector's dolphin. [30] [31]

Conservation

Dolphin deaths in bottom-set gillnets and trawl fisheries[32] have been responsible for substantial population declines in the last four decades. Gill-nets are made from lightweight monofilament that is difficult for dolphins to detect, especially when they are distracted (e.g. chasing fish) or moving around without using echolocation. Hector's and Maui's dolphins swim into the nets, get caught, and drown - or more accurately, suffocate (breathing is active in dolphins). Hector's dolphins are actively attracted to trawling vessels and can frequently be seen following trawlers and diving down to the net. They have been observed to follow 100-200m behind trawlers in large groups to forage, even picking fish out of the net itself.[24] Occasional mistakes can lead to injury or death.

The nationwide estimate for bycatch in commercial gillnets is 110-150 dolphins per year[33] which is far in excess of the sustainable level of human impact.[34] Deaths in fishing nets are the most serious threat (responsible for more than 95% of the human-caused deaths in Maui's dolphins), with currently lower level threats including tourism, disease, and marine mining.[35][36] Research of decreases in mitochondrial DNA diversity among hector's dolphin populations has suggested that the amount of gill-net entanglement deaths likely far surpasses that reported by fisheries.[30]

The New Zealand government proposed a set of plans to avoid further extinction of Hector's dolphin, including protecting/closing areas where dolphins are normally found and changing fishing methods to avoid catching dolphins. The plan involves three steps; The first is to change voluntary codes involving practice and monitoring for fisherman. The second is to close inshore areas from fishing. The third plan is formed around the potential biological removal (PBR) concept which tells how much change would need to be done to protect the dolphins and how much of the dolphins' extinction is caused by humans. PBR testing was done in eight bodies of water surrounding the South Island of New Zealand. These test unfortunately resulted in explaining that the time it would take to determine the populations of dolphins in these waters is much longer than expected and cannot be done until the populations are depleted, but affirms more protection needs to occur in these waters.[37]

The first marine protected area (MPA) for Hector's dolphin was designated in 1988 at Banks Peninsula, where commercial gill-netting was effectively prohibited out to 4 nmi (7.4 km; 4.6 mi) offshore and recreational gill-netting was subject to seasonal restrictions. A second MPA was designated on the west coast of the North Island in 2003. Populations continued to decline due to by-catch outside the MPAs.[12]

Additional protection was introduced in 2008, banning gill-netting within 4 nautical miles of the majority of the South Island's east and south coasts, out to 2 nautical miles (3.7 km) offshore off the South Island's west coast and extending the gillnet ban on the North Island's west coast to 7 nmi (13 km; 8.1 mi) offshore. Also, restrictions were placed on trawling in some of these areas. For further details on these regulations, see the Ministry of Fisheries website.[38] Five marine mammal sanctuaries were designated in 2008 to manage nonfishing-related threats to Hector's and Maui's dolphins.[39] Their regulations include restrictions on mining and seismic acoustic surveys. Further restrictions were introduced into Taranaki waters in 2012 and 2013 to protect Maui's dolphins.[40]

The Scientific Committee of the International Whaling Commission has recommended extending protection for Maui's dolphin further south to Whanganui and further offshore to 20 nautical miles from the coastline. The IUCN has recommended protecting Hector's and Maui's dolphins from gill-net and trawl fisheries, from the shoreline to the 100 m depth contour.

See also

References

  1. Reeves, R.R.; Dawson, S.M.; Jefferson, T.A.; Karczmarski, L.; Laidre, K.; O'Corry-Crowe, G.; Rojas-Bracho, L.; Secchi, E.R.; Slooten, E.; Smith, B.D.; Wang, J.Y. & Zhou, K. (2013). "Cephalorhynchus hectori". The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. IUCN. 2013: e.T4162A44199757. doi:10.2305/IUCN.UK.2013-1.RLTS.T4162A44199757.en. Retrieved 26 December 2017.
  2. 1 2 Baker, Alan N.; Smith, Adam N.H.; Pichler, Franz B. (2002). "Geographical variation in Hector's dolphin: recognition of a new subspecies of Cephalorhynchus hectori". Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand. 32 (4): 713–727. doi:10.1080/03014223.2002.9517717. Retrieved 18 June 2013.
  3. "Hector's Dolphin." WorldWildlife.org. World Wildlife Fund, n.d. Web. 23 October 2014.
  4. "Maui's dolphin abundance estimate". New Zealand Department of Conservation. Retrieved 13 March 2012.
  5. 1 2 Slooten, E. and Dawson, S.M. 1994. Hector's dolphin Cephalorhynchus hectori. Pp. 311-333 in: Handbook of Marine Mammals. Volume V (Delphinidae and Phocoenidae) (S.H. Ridgway and R. Harrison eds). Academic Press. New York.
  6. 1 2 Webster, T.A.; Dawson, S.M.; Slooten, E. (2009). Evidence of Sex Segregation in Hector’s Dolphin (Cehalorhynchus hectori). Aquatic Mammals. Vol. 35, Iss. 2.: 212-219.
  7. 1 2 Slooten, E. 1991. Age, growth and reproduction in Hector's dolphins. Canadian Journal of Zoology 69: 1689-1700.
  8. Reid A.. Halderen V.L.. 2013. Wildlife Management - Impact of Deep Sea Oil Development on New Zealand marine wildlife. Department of Zoology. University of Otago. Retrieved 18 December. 2014
  9. Slooten, E., Dawson, S.M. and Rayment, W.J. 2004. Aerial surveys for coastal dolphins: abundance of Hector’s dolphins off the South Island West Coast, New Zealand. Marine Mammal Science 20:477-490.
  10. Dawson, S.M., Slooten, E., DuFresne, S.D., Wade, P. and Clement, D.M. 2004. Small-boat surveys for coastal dolphins: Line-transect surveys of Hector’s dolphins (Cephalorhynchus hectori). Fishery Bulletin 102: 441-451.
  11. Slooten L.. Benjamins S.. Turek J.. 2011. Potential impacts of Project Next Generation on Hector’s'dolphins and other marine mammals. Otago University. Retrieved 4 November 2014
  12. 1 2 Slooten, E., Dawson, S.M., Rayment, W. and Childerhouse, S. 2006. "A new abundance estimate for Maui's dolphin: What does it mean for managing this critically endangered species?". Biological Conservation 128: 576-581.
  13. Tait M.. 2012. Creatures lurking in Bay waters. the Hawkes Bay Today. Retrieved 4 November 2014
  14. "Boost in numbers of Hector's dolphins". Stuff. Retrieved 10 August 2016.
  15. Slooten, E. and Dawson, S.M.: Updated population viability analysis, population trends and PBRs for Hector's and Maui dolphin. https://www.regulations.gov/document?D=NOAA-NMFS-2016-0118-0076
  16. Bräger, S., Harraway, J. and Manly, B.F.J. 2003. Habitat selection in a coastal dolphin species (Cephalorhynchus hectori). Marine Biology 143: 233-244.
  17. Rayment, W., Dawson, S. and Slooten, E. In press. Seasonal changes in distribution of Hector's dolphins at Banks Peninsula, New Zealand: implications for protected area design. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems. doi:10.1002/aqc.1049.
  18. 1 2 3 Bräger, S. H.-J. (1998). Behavioural ecology and population structure of Hector’s dolphin (Cephalorhynchus hectori) (Thesis, Doctor of Philosophy). University of Otago.
  19. Slooten, E. and Lad, F. 1991. Population biology and conservation of Hector's dolphins. Canadian Journal of Zoology 69: 1701-1707.
  20. 1 2 Slooten, E. (1991). Age, growth, and reproduction in Hector’s dolphins. Can J. Zool. 69(6): 1689-1700.
  21. Protection of Hector's dolphins around Bank's Peninsula. Department of Conservation. 1988. ISBN 0478010605.
  22. Miller, Elanor, Chris Lalas, Steve Dawson, Hiltrun Ratz, and Elisabeth Slooten. "Hector's Dolphin Diet: The Species, Sizes and Relative Importance of Prey Eaten by Cephalorhynchus Hectori, Investigated Using Stomach Content Analysis." Marine Mammal Science 29.4 (2012): 606-28. Web.
  23. Riches, Jenny. "Hector's and Maui's survival in Kiwi's hands, says WWF". Retrieved 11 May 2007.
  24. 1 2 Rayment, William, and Trudi Webster. "Observations of Hector's Dolphins () Associating with Inshore Fishing Trawlers at Banks Peninsula, New Zealand." New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 43.4 (2009): 911-16. Web.
  25. Kyhn, L.A.; Tougaard, J.; Jensen, F.; Wahlberg, M.; Stone, G.; Yoshinaga, A.; Beedholm, K.; Madsen, P.T. 2009: Feeding at a high pitch: source parameters of narrow band, high-frequency clicks from echolocating off-shore hourglass dolphins and coastal Hector’s dolphins. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 125(3): 1783–1791.
  26. Dawson, S.M. (1991) Clicks and Communication: The Behavioural and Social Contexts of Hector’s Dolphin Vocalizations. Ethology. Vol 88, Iss. 4.
  27. Banks Peninsula Marine Mammal Sanctuary Technical Report. Department of Conservation. 1992. pp. B-9. ISBN 0-478-01404-X.
  28. Roe, W.d., L. Howe, E.j. Baker, L. Burrows, and S.a. Hunter. "An Atypical Genotype of Toxoplasma Gondii as a Cause of Mortality in Hector's Dolphins (Cephalorhynchus Hectori)." Veterinary Parasitology 192.1-3 (2013): 67-74. Web.
  29. Webster, T.A.; Dawson, S.M.; Slooten, E. (2009). Evidence of Sex Segregation in Hector’s Dolphin (Cehalorhynchus hectori). Aquatic Mammals. Vol. 35, Iss. 2.: 212-219.
  30. 1 2 Pichler, F.B.; Baker, C.S. (2000). Loss of genetic diversity in the endemic Hector’s dolphin due to fisheries-related mortality. School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland.
  31. Pichler, F.B.; Dawson, S.M.; Slooten, E.; Baker, C.S. (2008). Geographic Isolation of Hector’s Dolphin Populations Described by Mitochondrial DNA Sequences. Conservation Biology. Vol 2, Iss. 3.
  32. Starr, P. and Langley, A. 2000. Inshore Fishery Observer Programme for Hector's dolphins in Pegasus Bay, Canterbury Bight, 1997/1998. Published client report on contract 3020, funded by Conservation Services Levy. Department of Conservation, Wellington. 28p.
  33. Davies, N.; Bian, R.; Starr, P.; Lallemand, P.; Gilbert, D. & McKenzie, J. (2008). Risk analysis of Maui's dolphin and Hector's dolphin subpopulations to commercial setnet fishing using a temporal-spatial age-structured model (PDF). Ministry of Fisheries, Wellington, New Zealand. Retrieved February 2013. Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  34. Slooten, E. and Dawson, S.M. 2008. Sustainable levels of human impact for Hector's dolphin. The Open Conservation Biology Journal 2: 37-43.
  35. Bejder, L., Dawson, S.M. and Harraway, J.A. 1999. Responses by Hector's dolphins to boats and swimmers in Porpoise Bay, New Zealand. Marine Mammal Science 15: 738-750.
  36. Stone, G. S. and Yoshinaga, A. 2000. Hector's dolphin (Cephalorhynchus hectori) calf mortalities may indicate new risks from boat traffic and habituation. Pacific Conservation Biology 6: 162-170.
  37. Slooten, E., and S.M. Dawson. "Sustainable Levels of Human Impact for Hector's Dolphin." The Open Conservation Biology Journal 2 (2008): 37-43. Web.
  38. "Hector's Dolphins". Ministry of Fisheries. 1 October 2008. Retrieved 16 February 2010.
  39. "Marine mammal sanctuaries: Marine protected areas". Department of Conservation. Retrieved 16 February 2010.
  40. Smith, Nick; Guy, Nathan. "Additional protections and survey results good news for dolphins". beehive.govt.nz. New Zealand Government.

Further reading

  • National Audubon Society: Guide to Marine Mammals of the World ISBN 0-375-41141-0
  • Encyclopedia of Marine Mammals ISBN 0-12-551340-2
  • Whales, Dolphins and Porpoises, Mark Carwardine 1995 ISBN 0-7513-2781-6
  • Facts about Hector's dolphins Department of Conservation - Several Images & listed as 'critically endangered' - Retrieved 2007-05-08.
  • Hector's Dolphins, New Zealand Ministry of Fisheries - Retrieved 2007-02-09.
  • Hector's Dolphin - Factsheet, Royal Forest and Bird Protection Society of New Zealand Inc. – Retrieved 2007-02-09.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.