Greeble (psychology)

The Greebles come in two genders and five families.[1]
samarosmitgalliradoktasio
plok
glip

The Greebles refers to an invented category of novel objects used as stimuli in psychological studies of object and face recognition. They were named by the psychologist Robert Abelson.[2] The greebles were created for Isabel Gauthier's dissertation work at Yale,[3] so as to share constraints with faces: they have a small number of parts in a common configuration. Greebles have appeared in psychology textbooks,[4][5] and in more than 25 scientific articles on perception (see below). They are often used in mental rotation task experiments.

Footnotes

  1. Gauthier, Tarr (1997), p.1674
  2. Gauthier, Tarr (1997), p.1673
  3. Gauthier (1998)
  4. John R. Anderson (2005). Cognitive Psychology and its Implications. Worth Publishers. Here: sect.2.1.4 on Face Recognition
  5. E. Bruce Goldstein (2007). Sensation and Perception. Belmont/CA: Wadsworth / Thomson Learning Company. Here: sect.4.5 on Evolution and Plasiticity

References

  • Gauthier, I.; Tarr, M. J. (1997). "Becoming a "Greeble" expert: Exploring mechanisms for face recognition" (PDF). Vision Research. 37 (12): 1673–1682. doi:10.1016/s0042-6989(96)00286-6.
  • Isabel Gauthier (1998). Dissecting face recognition: The role of expertise and level of categorization in object recognition (Ph.D.). Yale University.
  • Williams, P.; Gauthier, I.; Tarr, M. J. (1998). "Feature learning during the acquisition of perceptual expertise" [Commentary on Schyns, Goldstone & Thibault. The development of features in object concepts]". Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 21 (1): 40–41. doi:10.1017/S0140525X98510102.
  • Gauthier, I.; Williams, P.; Tarr, M. J.; Tanaka, J. (1998). "Training "Greeble" experts: A framework for studying expert object recognition processes" (PDF). Vision Research. 38 (15–16): 2401–2428. doi:10.1016/s0042-6989(97)00442-2.
  • Abelson, RP; Dasgupta, N; Park, J. Banaji; MR (1998). "Perceptions of the collective other" (PDF). Pers Soc Psycholo Rev. 45 (10): 1213–23.
  • Gauthier, I.; Tarr, M.J.; Anderson, A.W.; Skudlarski, P.; Gore, J. C. (1999). "Activation of the middle fusiform "face area" increases with expertise in recognizing novel objects" (PDF). Nature Neuroscience. 2 (6): 568–573. doi:10.1038/9224.
  • Tarr, M. J.; Gauthier, I. (2000). "FFA: A flexible fusiform area for subordinate-level visual processing automatized by expertise" (PDF). Nature Neuroscience. 3 (8): 764–769. doi:10.1038/77666.
  • Rossion, B.; Gauthier, I.; Tarr, M.J.; Despland, P.; Bruyer, R; Linotte, S.; Crommelinck, M. (2000). "The N170 occipito-temporal component is delayed and enhanced to inverted faces but not to inverted objects: an electrophysiological account of face-specific processes in the human brain" (PDF). NeuroReport. 11 (1): 69–74. doi:10.1097/00001756-200001170-00014.
  • Rossion, B.; Gauthier, I; Goffaux, V.; Tarr, M.J.; Crommelinck, M. (2002). "Expertise training with novel objects leads to left lateralized face-like electrophysiological responses". Psychological Science. 13 (3): 250–257. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00446.
  • Gauthier, I., & Tarr., M. J. (2002). "Unraveling mechanisms for expert object recognition: Bridging Brain Activity and Behavior", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28(2): 431-446.
  • James, T. W.; Gauthier, I. (2003). "Auditory and action semantic feature types activate sensory-specific perceptual brain regions" (PDF). Current Biology. 13 (20): 1792–6. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2003.09.039.
  • Duchaine, B. C.; Dingle, K.; Butterworth, E. Nakayama (2004). "Normal greeble learning in a severe case of developmental prosopagnosia" (PDF). Neuron. 43 (4): 469–73. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2004.08.006.
  • Palmeri, T. J.; Gauthier, I. (2004). "Visual Object Understanding" (PDF). Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 4: 291–303. doi:10.1038/nrn1364. Archived from the original on 2006-09-02.
  • Gauthier, I.; Behrmann, M.; Tarr, M. J. (2004). "Are Greebles like faces? Using the neuropsychological exception to test the rule" (PDF). Neuropsychologia. 42 (14): 1961–70. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.04.025.
  • Rossion, B.; Kung, C.C.; Tarr, M. J. (2004). "Visual expertise with nonface objects leads to competition with the early perceptual processing of faces in the human occipitotemporal cortex". PNAS. 42 (14): 1961–70. doi:10.1073/pnas.0405613101. PMC 521961.
  • Behrmann, M.; Marrota, J.; Gauthier, I.; Tarr, M.J.; McKeef, T. J. (2005). "Behavioral change and its neural correlates in visual agnosia after expertise training". Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 17 (4): 554–68. doi:10.1162/0898929053467613.
  • James, T.W.; Shima, D.W.; Tarr, M.J.; Gauthier, I. (2005). "Generating complex three-dimensional stimuli (Greebles) for haptic expertise training" (PDF). Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers. 37 (2): 353–8. doi:10.3758/bf03192703.
  • Vuong, Qc; Peissig, JJ; Harrison, MC; Tarr, MJ (2005). "The role of surface pigmentation for recognition revealed by contrast reversal in faces and Greebles" (PDF). Vision Research. 45 (10): 1213–23. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2004.11.015.
  • Wagar, B. M.; Dixon, M. J. (2005). "Past experience influences object representation in working memory". Brain and Cognition. 57: 248–256. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2004.08.054.
  • Cox, D.D.; Meier, P.; Oertelt, N.; DiCarlo, J. J. (2005). "'Breaking' position-invariant object recognition" (PDF). Nature Neuroscience. 8: 1145–1147. doi:10.1038/nn1519.
  • Bukach, C. M.; Bub, D. N.; Gauthier, I.; Tarr, M. J. (2006). "Perceptual expertise effects are not all or none: Spatially limited perceptual expertise for faces in a case of prosopagnosia". Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 18 (1): 48–63. doi:10.1162/089892906775250094.
  • Behrmann, M.; Avidan, G.; Leonard, G.L.; Kimchi, R.; Luna, B.; Humphreys, K; Minshew, N. (2006). "Configural processing in autism and its relationship to face processing" (PDF). Neuropsychologia. 44: 110–129. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.04.002.
  • Lahaie, A.; Mottron, L.; Arguin, M.; Berthiaume, C.; Jemel, B.; Saumier, D. (2006). "Face perception in high-functioning autistic adults: evidence for superior processing of face parts, not for a configural face-processing deficit". Neuropsychology. 20 (1): 30–41. doi:10.1037/0894-4105.20.1.30.
  • Wolley, A.W., Hackman, J.R., Jerde, T.E., Chabris, C.F., Bennett, S.L., Koslyn, S.M. (2007). "Using brain-based measures to compose teams: how individual capabilities and team collaboration strategies jointly shape performance". Soc. Neurosci. 2(2): 96-105.
  • Hoffman, K.L.; Ghazanfar, A.A.; Gauthier, I.; Logothetis, N.K. (2008). "Category-specific responses to faces and objects in primate auditory cortex". Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience. 1: 2. doi:10.3389/neuro.06.002.2007. PMC 2526270. PMID 18958243.
  • Scherf, K.S.; Behrmann, M.; Minshew, N.; Luna, B. (2008). "Atypical development of face and greeble recognition in autism". Psychiatry. 49 (8): 838–47. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2008.01903.x. PMC 3071970.
  • Richler, J.J.; Tanaka, J.W.; Brown, D.D.; Gauthier, I. (2008). "Why does selective attention to parts fail in face processing?". Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 34 (6): 1356–1368. doi:10.1037/a0013080.
  • Richler, J.J.; Bukach, C.M.; Gauthier, I. (2009). "Context influences holistic processing of nonface objects in the composite task". Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics. 71 (3): 530–540. doi:10.3758/APP.71.3.530. PMC 3732490. PMID 19304644.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.